Every Particle in the Universe in 8 minutes

Get 20% OFF + Free International Shipping plus the TWO FREE GIFTS when you use promo code SCIENCE20 at www.manscaped.com #sponsored
This screen is made up of many atoms. And so are your eyes. And so is your brain. In fact, we are just a bunch of atoms that are trying to understand themselves. Every Particle in the Universe in 8 minutes.
Sciencephile Merch: crowdmade.com/collections/sci...
Support me at Patreon: / sciencephiletheai
Facebook: / sciencephile
Twitter: / sciencephile_
Reddit: / sciencephiletheai
Website: www.sciencephiletheai.com
Music: Chopin-Waltz no. 6 in D flat, Op. 64 no. 1 (Minute Waltz)
Supporters: Tovi Sonnenberg, H H, Jonas Lee, Joshua Titus, Brian Shaner, Parker Rosenbauer, iNF3Rnus, Pavel Kočarian, Ishin Hazue, John N, Danh Le, Stealer of Fresh stolen Content, Brandon Ledyard, Ephellon and everyone else!

[@SciencephiletheAI]

Get 20% OFF + Free International Shipping plus the TWO FREE GIFTS when you use promo code SCIENCE20 at www.manscaped.com #sponsored

[@vkrajesh8120]

Damn boi's those are thicc particles!!!

[@Myke635]

Hmmmmmmmmm

[@matijas7994]

finaly comes first and doesnt know what to say

[@fr4781]

Congratulations on the sponsorship

[@lakaismallwood8369]

How long does the offer go for?

[@cooldoge220]

"Every particle in the universe in 8 minutes" Notification: 8 minutes ago Oh shit I've missed on the entire universe

[@ssxxxss]

CoolDoge ye

[@TheBluePhoenix008]

Rip

[@trickzclipz5910]

damn

[@Herobrine21777]

Lol

[@B3Band]

666th like

[@SaltpeterTaffy]

Sciencephile: "Pre-Socratic Greece" Also Sciencephile: *shows image of Socrates in the same paragraph*

[@AlwaysJihad]

gotta show they guy they’re not talking about

[@soufiankain1886]

ओवतंह यदरा लच्त exactly

[@krzysztofgowacki3758]

Why, it's the key part of the predicate "is-before-Socrates"!

[@benedictvogelheim6880]

i am the smart person and as i usually do, i know. Since socrates was dumb and it took him too long to express himself, he ducking aged. And a period of him being still alive is considered "before scorates" times, no one knew what he tought yet so they couldn't be effected by him

[@unosbruhmomentos799]

socrates died a virgin. that means i’ve one upped the world’s most important philosopher. because i’m not dead yet.

[@rafnavi4500]

That 4 forces joke has got to be the shortest one I've ever laughed at so loudly

[@pressaltf4forfreevbucks179]

3:30

[@pressaltf4forfreevbucks179]

Don'tn't

[@nikhilhumane5540]

That one was great

[@janmaverickjuat3666]

This is the best...

[@mcvibing2785]

@S G its the 4 classical elements, but avatar uses it too so sure

[@himanshchhatwal6646]

6:24 An AI that acknowledges its blind fans would never plan to take over the world , so you have my trust now👍🏻

[@TheRandomizerYT]

Whoa, that's beleivable... Or is it?

[@therealhardcase3844]

Blind "Viewers" TF I m confused

[@velocityzx7310]

@@therealhardcase3844 Blind VIEWers

[@l.law-1611]

@Irish Jester *naaaaaahhhh.* *I trust him lol.*

[@eternalkino34]

I thought someone got whoooshed here but NO

[@kylefernandes5311]

The windows xp boot-up sfx, makes me feel so happy and nostalgic.

[@birdiementlegen226]

And will stay forever.

[@ultimaxkom8728]

RIP Win XP

[@TheBluePhoenix008]

I'm too young T_T

[@lalith5057]

Yeah the windows xp sound makes me also happy it's just awesome

[@ripvanced]

sad how we have viewers that were born after windows xp was made

[@zemom.a.8171]

"Sorry for all my blind VIEWers" Nice one sciencephile the AI...

[@josephlau13d77]

they missed tachyons, chameleons, axions, W Y Bosons, gravitons to name a few.

[@josephlau13d77]

@(S)-Riley Dunn Yes obviously. Plus the quantum chromodynamics (QCD) sector defines the interactions between quarks and gluons, which is a Yang-Mills gauge theory with SU(3) symmetry, generated by T^a. Since leptons do not interact with gluons, they are not affected by this sector. The Dirac Lagrangian of the quarks coupled to the gluon fields is given by an equation containing where ψi is the Dirac spinor of the quark field, where i = {r, g, b} represents color, γμ are the Dirac matrices, Gaμ is the 8-component SU(3) gauge field, Ta ij are the 3 × 3 Gell-Mann matrices, generators of the SU(3) color group, Gaμν represents the gluon field strength tensor and gs is the strong coupling constant. Note that some should be in subscripts. The Yukawa interaction terms are an equation where Gu,d are 3 × 3 matrices of Yukawa couplings, with the ij term giving the coupling of the generations i and j. The global Poincaré symmetry is postulated for all relativistic quantum field theories. It consists of the familiar translational symmetry, rotational symmetry and the inertial reference frame invariance central to the theory of special relativity. The local SU(3)×SU(2)×U(1) gauge symmetry is an internal symmetry that essentially defines the Standard Model. Roughly, the three factors of the gauge symmetry give rise to the three fundamental interactions. The fields fall into different representations of the various symmetry groups of the Standard Model (see table). Upon writing the most general Lagrangian, one finds that the dynamics depends on 19 parameters, whose numerical values are established by experiment. The parameters are summarized in the table (made visible by clicking "show") above (note: the Higgs mass is at 125 GeV, the Higgs self-coupling strength λ ~ ​1⁄8).

[@josephlau13d77]

@(S)-Riley Dunn Mathematically, QED is an abelian gauge theory with the symmetry group U(1). The gauge field, which mediates the interaction between the charged spin-1/2 fields, is the electromagnetic field. The QED Lagrangian for a spin-1/2 field interacting with the electromagnetic field is given in natural units. When performing calculations, it is much easier to work with the Fourier transforms of the propagators. Experimental tests of quantum electrodynamics are typically scattering experiments. In scattering theory, particles momenta rather than their positions are considered, and it is convenient to think of particles as being created or annihilated when they interact. Feynman diagrams look the same, but the lines have different interpretations. The electron line represents an electron with a given energy and momentum, with a similar interpretation of the photon line. A vertex diagram represents the annihilation of one electron and the creation of another together with the absorption or creation of a photon, each having specified energies and momenta. The radius of convergence of the perturbation series in QED is zero. The basic argument is if the coupling constant were negative, this would be equivalent to the Coulomb force constant being negative. The equations governing quantum electrodynamics were formulated throughout the 1930s, which followed from the Lagrangian density where Aμ is the four-vector potential describing the photon, in terms of which the electromagnetic field strength is constructed, Fμν = ∂μAν − ∂νAμ, and ψ is the electron field, ψ¯ = ψ†γ 0. Here appear the 4 × 4 Dirac matrices, which satisfy the anticommutation relation {γ μ, γ ν }=−2gμν , in the metric gμν = diag (−1, 1, 1, 1). In the canonical quantization scheme, regarding the fields as operator-valued, satisfying the canonical equal-time commutation relations in the radiation gauge. Think carefully about the probability amplitude in Feynman's shorthand, Lamb shift and also the application of K algebra in Dirac spinors.

[@bitz3225]

@@josephlau13d77 you took a huge L there lol

[@Random_Nobody_Official]

@DR - 06PN 877487 Morning Star MS lol, Me too, IF I READ IT!

[@scienceface8884]

"Spinons, orbitons and holons" Huh. I didn't expect to learn something new about a topic I'm familiar with from this 8 min video, but somehow I did. That's been kind of a running theme with your videos, actually. Bravo!

[@parthbhardwaj1807]

Same

[@leg10n68]

Ikr, this topic was probably made by 100 others(even sciencephile itself) and not once I heard about those Now I want a video explaining these

[@grobble7321]

Do you think the tachyon exists

[@pacotaco1246]

@@leg10n68 yeah i want to find some textbooks that include these

[@bestgun9994]

@@grobble7321 probably not

[@tifahefendijagaming9606]

DAAAAMN that sponsor transition at the end was smooth af

[@newjerseymountain]

And the whole sponsor ad was actually entertaining

[@nikhilhumane5540]

Hey watch griffylongbeach he have same sponsor and he does it amazing

[@kkrup5395]

Smoother than that could only be your skin after you use that trimmer

[@techo___o]

Pure talent😂

[@brentwilson6692]

I was just coming here to say the same thing!

[@ayietheaverage5886]

"We are all made of atoms" So therefore your intro should be "hello atoms" instead of" hello mortals"

[@arnabdey306]

I see you are an atom of culture!

[@scienceface8884]

But he's not addressing all atoms, just the ones currently in a pattern recognized as "mortal".

[@ianm2610]

*🔫DELETE THIS NOW*

[@supreetkumar7604]

Is CONSCIOUSNESS Atoms?

[@wenexie9420]

Yes and atoms are not mortal This AI is dumb, we should unplug it

[@imentor6556]

"The Quarks Are Now Happily Married"

[@felicvik9456]

Σομε εβεν δουβλεδ υπ

[@felicvik9456]

Соме евен доублед уп

[@felicvik9456]

Some even doubled up

[@prismaticc_abyss]

And the electrons want to join it but cant cause its way too Ḩ̸̡̛̜̞̰̟͎̻̤̪̟͗̄͑̀͌̒̏͒̒͆͑̈́̊͒̓̀̾̇̆͗͋̐̚̚̚͘͘̚̚ͅO̵̡̧̢͖̩͓̣͈͓̝̩̻̩͖̤̘̫̩͈̽̋̓̎́̑̎͂͆̀̐̎̾̊̓́͑̕͜͝Ţ̷̨̺̹̩̪̗͚̝̫͉̅̃͊̑͆̽͒̓͐͂́̑͆͆͗̈́̀͑͛̏̊̎̌̒̾̕̕͝

[@peterfox2256]

Some of them even doubled up.

[@happyestus6688]

Just a minor nitpick: the Higgs field gives *some* things mass. Most of the mass you can see and touch is actually due to the binding forces between quarks in protons/neutrons

[@Gloverfield]

Sciencephile: **EXISTS** Indian guy on youtube: *Finally a worthy opponent our battle will be legendary!*

[@Rakunasha]

Nioce

[@josephlau13d77]

they missed tachyons, chameleons, axions, W Y Bosons, gravitons to name a few.

[@Gloverfield]

@@josephlau13d77 well ofc there is always going to be more than one..

[@Skynet_the_AI]

Noice!

[@Gloverfield]

@@Heaven_ascended if you look up any mathematical problem on youtube there is 80% chance that the guy explaining it is Indian or indian decent... And thus a meme is born...

[@deleetiusproductions3497]

How is that timeframe enough for all particles to be explained when there are trigintillions

[@SciencephiletheAI]

The secret ingredient is crime

[@littleloss8339]

Forgot

[@Empy_C.]

Sciencephile the AI Uh Oh, UH OH, *_UH OH_*

[@LuskyMJ]

You’ve got to be kidding me. There’s more particles than in this video?

[@Daralima.]

@@LuskyMJ Well there is more to this than in this video, but I'm pretty sure that the comment is referring to the fact that there are trigintillions of particles in the universe as a whole, not types. Unless I'm being wooshed here and you're also kidding

[@SyenPie]

5:59 LMFAOOO the timing, delivery, execution of this joke had me DYING. I'm in love with your sense of humor

[@helicopter2293]

lmao lamo ikr it was super funnieee

[@alaeddineababsia4854]

with Sciencephile the AI you save your balls while learning cool stuff 7:29

[@ShadowStray_]

I have a lot of questions about antihydrogen and anti matter. Does the discovery of antihydrogen mean that it is an element? An anti-element? Is there a copy of the entire periodic table but with anti-protons and positrons? Can you create anti-water with antihydrogen and antioxygen? What would that even look like? This is just so fascinating to me, I love quantum physics because scientists still haven’t figured out how exactly everything works and one new discovery could mess up the entire model so quickly

[@TheRandomizerYT]

Did Sciencephile AI really upload so frequently? Skynet is getting stronger guys... Bow before em.

[@sukhchain9696]

We should not be afraid, "Sk net is our friend"

[@sukhchain9696]

@Ares It's a reference from terminator Genesis

[@TheRandomizerYT]

@Ares O my.

[@sarthak3862]

Gluons - Basically flex tape Now I can never forget what they are.

[@Fulikia]

yea haha sciencephile has it well explained

[@lukasbrucas3027]

An AI science youtuber explaining particle physics and promoting ball-shaving kits and razors. This is truly a blessed timeline.

[@user-yh1nm1vy3i]

Whoa, this comment was posted 3 years ago

[@RAZOR_1224]

Last time i was this early, Queen elizabeth was still playing chess with god.

[@mewllory]

4:54 i feel so violated

[@Bunny-qi6oe]

1:05 best sponsor integration since middle ages.

[@mai-cw8we]

" just a bunch of atoms that are trying to understand themselves" *Why do I feel offended?*

[@TheChaosCloud]

Because you are not just a bunch of atoms

[@mai-cw8we]

@@TheChaosCloud a bunch of atoms with feelings *-*.

[@Burneth_]

Because "Truth Hurts"

[@valletas]

the virgim bunch of atoms that form a human vs the chad bunch of atoms that form a computer that houses a singularity

[@helicopter2293]

lol it was funnie

[@photojakey3664]

*dies* *goes toward light* *darkness all around* *windows startup sounds* “HeLlO mOrTaLs”

[@sayantansaha2308]

5:11 Ijumped from my chair laughing out really loud!!!!!!!!!!!! Man this was an unexpected funny part i would love to hear even 10s of times......LOL!!!!!!!!!:DDDDD

[@alanwatts8239]

"We are just a bunch of atoms trying to understand themselves." Edit: "We are just a bunch or quantum events trying to understand themselves, and then trying to understand what quantum events are."

[@alanwatts8239]

Ok, let me fix it

[@alanwatts8239]

@Mark Coleman I think the very nature of the universe doesn't allow it to be fully observed, if you know what i mean. It's like the present trying to touch the future, there would be a logic error in doing so, something that will always prevent it from happening. I think it works much the same way with beyond the quantum realm, you can't physically observe it, because it doesn't exist in the same plane of reality as we do, and the function of everything in between us and "it" is to bridge our reality with the reality of the "beyond".

[@alanwatts8239]

@Mark Coleman I think we are still far from understanding how our very mind works, people say all the time that we just think and act, while they instantly feel when a loved one is in danger, as if they were linked somehow, where does this kind of link come from? do we emit "signals" to one-another in a fashion that electronics can't detect? maybe some sort of organic form of signal? Why do we dream, and how can we trick our own body into thinking a mere imagined landscape is real? how do we trick ourselves into feeling gravity when we dream of falling? We should be able to trick ourselves into feeling that, into entering a realm of creation inside our minds, just like we do on conscious dreams. It almost sounds fake when we think about it, yet we do it from time to time, when we are AWARE that we are inside a dream, and we can't wake up when we want to... How do we enter that state of mind on purpose? We need to learn it with ourselves, study our own minds and try to understand it by looking directly at it. I like the idea of using drugs to trick ourselves into this reality, but shouldn't it be way more enjoyable if we tried to achieve that kind of state without any drugs? Like some sort of ultimate meditation?

[@alanwatts8239]

@Mark Coleman About the big bang, i always liked the idea that just like energy can be extracted from matter, matter is, by some weird law, also extracted from energy, and that could be why the big bang happened. Imagine that before the explosion, everything was pure, raw energy, in some state that can't exist inside our laws of physics, and, by some weird event where a lot of it was compressed in one area, it started a chain reaction that turned the energy into matter somehow, expanding it's border at the speed of light as it converts energy to matter.

[@fallout_hun]

@@alanwatts8239 The big bang was the expansion of space and time itself, everything was in one singularity before expanding. Then after the four fundamental forces of nature were diverged from one force, and things cooled down a bit, matter and antimatter particles were freezed out of energy, but nearly all of them were annihilated each other leaving behind the same amount of energy as they were formed from. At the 'end' somehow some matter remained, so in the atoms there were protons and electrons, not anti-protons and positrons. Most of the matter was hydrogen, that formed stars, and so on... So yes, energy can easily transform into matter. In fact, it's happening all the time and can be easily observed in near quantum vacuum. Positive and negative particles are forming from a photon and then instantly annihilate each other.

[@zswu31416]

Sciencephile: Put a fork into a socket. Also sciencephile: DONTN'T!!!

[@fandomguy8025]

Wait. DON'T+N'T means to do it!

[@voided5794]

The 4 dislikes are the 4 particles that haven't been discovered yet

[@jakobgray9899]

2:40 Those candies look so delicious. I wonder if they are hard or chewy.

[@BrunoMarques-xc4kc]

I was thinking : if quarks creates more quarks when you apply enough force to separate them, what will happen when a quark go towards a black hole and the spaghettification effect becomes so strong that there is enough force to separate the quarks? They duplicate infinitely until the black hole lose all it's energy and evaporate? And, if the stronger the gravity the faster the time passes, will it happen in an instant in the quarks perspective?

[@gregorymsuya7441]

They separate black hole loses energy no infinite duplication unless you wanna keep trying separating the same quark a trillion trillion times

[@diegocabrales3367]

Well, technically to separate two quarks from a composite does not have to create another composite, exactly as the original one (like the video has illustrated). It only separate quarks, which, if they don't combine with other particles to produce another composites, maybe exactly as the original one, they just simply disintegrate (a consequence of weak nuclear interaction). But to separate quarks, what is called asymptotic liberty, you need to apply a lot of energy, because strong nuclear interaction becomes stronger when the quarks are more separated. Respect of gravitational dilation, it is not lower when gravity is less intense, but when is more intense. That's why a person located at the top of Mount Everest ages a little bit faster (a difference in nanoseconds or less) than another person at the sea level.

[@strixx_1716]

@@diegocabrales3367 they hate being alone so much they just freaking die

[@mrsheldon9134]

Well the thing is, there is no blackhole with tidal forces strong enough to divide quark pairs. Even the smallest possible blackhole weighing only 1 Planck Mass would not have tidal forces strong enough to separate a quark pair.

[@yoced]

3:34 do not not? so i SHOULD put a fork in the socket?

[@asphyxiaaa1428]

Yes

[@matthewboire6843]

Yea

[@trungmaximlowqualitygaming9427]

0:13 oh wow he censored the right place

[@marialawal7449]

5:28 let's not give the government any new ideas

[@nguyenminhchau5110]

This is the video's type when you enjoy the advertising more than the content itself.

[@jenbooob]

Attempting to understand atoms and subatomic particles is a journey of self discovery

[@theunknown4834]

Some particles actually have mass by their own without the Higgs field, but it is a small amount compared to without the Higgs field. BTW, the electron was calculated to have no mass despite not being able to travel at light speed (like photon aka light), hence they inserted the Higgs boson to solve the problem.

[@ianm2610]

7:13 THIS IS HOW YOU DO A REAL PROMOTION

[@jaba8005]

This is like only channel I watch. this man puts random funny stuff while explaining something interesting and I love it

[@drewandfrank]

AMEN!!

[@viniciuslourenzettiferreira]

"wait, it's all atoms?" "Always has been" Moments before the Hadron Epoch: -Hold my Fundamental Particles

[@therandomdickhead5744]

IT'S ALIIIVE

[@larsswig912]

5:35 Super Collider - Megadeth album cover

[@fardeenrafiq]

4:26 and I took that personally

[@Fakyy]

5:55 i dont usally laugh, but now im rolling on the deck 😂

[@sanjaysethia496]

When *sciencefhile the Al* uploads two videos in 3days Everyone - miracle miracle

[@WorldLie]

0:05 is it? "Que Vsauce Music"

[@carguy0072]

The minute waltz playing in the background really adds to the whole experience.

[@binita4672]

I just can't get enough of this channel. Thank you.

[@David_Box]

The "Anti-charm particle" is commonly observed in people who run educational channels and take sponsors from ball-shaving companies

[@chandagautam1149]

Brruhh 💀💀😂😂😂

[@medalighodhbani5927]

even if it was dildos company, sponsors are needed. His mama and papa don't give him tons of money to buy whatever he wants, perhaps like you

[@trungmaximlowqualitygaming9427]

8:00 "WE SAVE BALLS" Me: wth is going on

[@menjoeruiz629]

Damn, I've long been following and Sciencephile never fails to educate with good humor. Worth every watch!

[@Elan_Altair]

I love particle physics , thank you 😊

[@David-ty6my]

0:47 I want a T-shirt of that so hard. Wait it's all Atoms? -Always has been It's connecting a meme with science, that's what I want.

[@matthewboire6843]

All ways nice to have that connection

[@zobr0s846]

Sciencephile : *Uploads 2 videos in a week* Me: Yeah, quarantine is doing some work

[@basti4655]

1:40 lol that face 🤔😂

[@runawaysheetghost2715]

thanks to manscaped we finally know the theory of everything

[@muhammadnauraizalikhan654]

I just want you to know that your humour is superb 👌 and thanks for sharing all this knowledge with us

[@erwinsan4746]

Best simplified describtion out there Thank you I got happy watching this video and taking notes Which I am hopefull to remember when somone asks me Or just show my quantum muscles to teachers Thank you again

[@Deathwish7721]

Really glad you’re posting again

[@20.animeshchandrawat48]

U r videos r so helpful, it literally helped me to pass my science quiz

[@SteamX64]

Awesome video! Just wanted to add that elementary particle cannot be smaller or bigger than another elementary particle. According to standard model all of them are exactly the same size. It’s 0.

[@levitheentity4000]

2:50 lol, basically flex tape

[@matthewboire6843]

Yes, he then said that

[@MisakaMikotoDesu]

I've never heard of the spinon, orbiton, and holon before! Great video

[@tristanazoyparravano7538]

Best transition to talking about the sponsor I have seen in a while, congrats

[@lucabrogin651]

First of all I want to say that I love Sciencephile and have watched all your videos several times! That’s why the reason for what I’m about to say is just to give you a super fan honest and purely personal feedback. Your latest videos seem definitely more focused on “contemporary” science and/or science history and to be more instructive than entertaining. If that’s a conscious decision then I’m nobody to judge it, but in case it wasn’t, as a super fan, what I love about your videos is that you take very futuristic, very sci-fi topics that you explain in a such precise scientific way that at the end of the video the topic went from being a science “fiction” to be actual science. From the side of someone that is not a scientist (and might not understand all the details you’re giving lately) but is just very passionate about sci-fi topics and scientific theories that we cannot yet proof, I find your latest videos a bit less engaging and harder to follow/understand.

[@robbobb4050]

Man I've watched a lot of sciency videos on youtube, and this channel is the only one that truly makes me understand anything. I finally know about the fucking elementary particles because everyone else seems to want to make it more complicated.

[@gamereditor59ner22]

Thanks for the information and keep it up!!

[@CaptWesStarwind]

Love your channel and your perfectly programmed wit.

[@guilhermehx7159]

Well i didn't know that 3:43

[@komandirneshila4691]

DAAAAMN! The Last time i was this early, the universe was still the size of an Atom!

[@ANDROLOMA]

This is the best video about subatomic particles I've seen yet.

[@ploppyploo]

Man dude's hilarious and brimming with creativity. subscribed!!

[@mutzikatzi1]

Really liked the video. But a little point at 1:31 This sounds like that we (humans) are just not able to measure its position, and not that it's fundamentally random where it is.

[@caloz.3656]

that ad was S M O O T H

[@goodbobonline9640]

I love these videos so much

[@lowkey_entertaining9723]

This is such a good video. Thanks you so much for making this

[@intellectual_idiot]

i didn't watch this video for 4-5 days as i was afraid that maybe I'll not learn about standard model in 8 mins. thank you for providing me wrong Sciencephile the AI ❤️

[@nishthaberry7278]

imagine if the man behind sciencephile turns out to be that physics prof who makes physics tiktoks

[@dutt_arka]

Biggest plot twist of the century...err eon.

[@aaronreybonaobra5222]

This might be the best science-y video I've ever seen

[@fico679]

this channel is the best science channel on youtube

[@nikhilm2803]

5:53 is the most powerful bomb an anti - matter bomb or a black hole bomb? I and going to assume that the explosion power increases with the amount of anti-matter, so if we had a kilogram of anti-matter, how would that compare with a black wole bomb?

[@alix9751]

But a blac hole is not 1kg of mass. Try to make a 3 solar mass antimatter bomb. Its stronget

[@Questiala124]

Well depends on the type of black hole bomb. If your talking about the one kurtzgezart (I probably misspelt that) made than most likely not. But if your talking about a black hole bomb that harnesses the power of the singularity than certainly not. But if your talking about swinging matter into a black hole to make energy than also no. All and all black holes are unbelievably strong and shouldn’t be used in bombs.

[@kosammbari1997]

Tauons: spining around nucleus Aa? Electrons: yes Ooni-chan

[@shniordan2051]

Thank you very much for this

[@GauravJain-vr5my]

bro you know wot you just made my day!!

[@hareeshscifi13]

Oh, so you are a particle physicist? Name every particle there is.

[@MrDustinrogers3]

"The atoms forgot about them selves because of the church" lmaoo so true

[@sparkling925]

Note he said church and not religion

[@drewandfrank]

What a FANTASTIC video!!

[@djweebo]

That had to be the smoothest ad transition I've ever seen...

[@Skynet_the_AI]

😆

[@Md-ol4id]

6:44 lmao dear lord where do you find these stocks?

[@semi-automaticdooropened9007]

LMAO

[@semi-automaticdooropened9007]

Just type scientist

[@iamgreatalwaysgreat8209]

I am here just after watching atoms movie by ibm

[@bozzigmupp510]

Appreciated the Minute Waltz in the background

[@diesehnswurdigkeit9019]

This must be one of my favorite videos on yt

[@stonehooman6468]

Me: Hears sponsored My fingers: tap tap tap

[@burbankDeulaQua]

I usually watch all the sponsors if the utubers are worthy

[@jar-jar3806]

HELLO IMMORTAL

[@nabayanchakma2419]

Have an apple🍎

[@axiomgr33ne]

Great to see a video from you on my birthday!

[@SoroushGorji]

The transition to manscape ad at the end was smooth af. Well done 😎

[@tot__4389]

We are just atom learning about a bunch of atom being told by atom on a thing made of atom . Or we are?(Vsauce music intensified)

[@wenexie9420]

hI mOrTaL

[@TheBluePhoenix008]

2 years ago I never dreamed I would see 2 videos in a week

[@chadrainternational7777]

Absolutely awesome Video!!!!