Every Type of Anarchism Explained in 12 Minutes

[@EntropyAndSingularity]

I love telling people that I’m an anarchist because most people associate it with chaos and disorder. I can be true to myself and terrify my enemies at the same time. Win-win!

[@BrofessorStein]

These poor souls...

[@mercedesmarxist69]

@@BrofessorStein way too many

[@SxGxNoise]

Yeah always

[@kubakornijenko1927]

@@EntropyAndSingularity I do understand the idea behind anarchism, don’t get me wrong, I know what you want. That said in my opinion the rule of the mob is no rule at all.

[@bojassem12]

@kubakornijenko1927 so you would rather be told what do instead of think and govern for yourself? Mob rule is a just what the elites call it because they don't want to lose control. In reality it is true democracy.

[@DefinitelySpirit]

One thing I love about anarchism is that all variants (except ancapism) are compatible and are just different sets of priorities, and broadly speaking, everyone is their own type of anarchist.

[@BrofessorStein]

@@DefinitelySpirit that's actually true, quite consistent

[@ShadowMoon878]

True. I am an Anarcho-Syndicalist-Socialist

[@Lexcoaster]

Not really, Anarcho-communism isn´t compatible either, because it doesn't do away with the State.

[@NameWithheld999]

Other forms of anarchists have criticisms and incompatibility with primitivism. Primitivism would reject a lot of medical technology that other schools of anarchism would say increases people’s autonomy and empowerment.

[@DefinitelySpirit]

@@NameWithheld999 I see, theres also an argument against mutualism, I do believe theres valuable aspects of primitivism, personally do not believe that part.

[@Kys_ws]

Btw all anarchism are not Contradictory and many can be applied at the same time

[@jakobhoward2287]

I agree on that. There is no dogmatic reason for anarchism.

[@WeegeeSlayer123]

What about anarcho capitalism?

[@Kys_ws]

@@WeegeeSlayer123 anarchism is defined by the Deletion of hierarchy, hierchy who is defenintly needed in capitalism so by définition "anarcho'' capitalisme is just have a piece of land where the rule of stronger is always the best

[@aimless836]

@@WeegeeSlayer123 anarcho-capitalism more based on objectivism than anarchism. The only thing anarcho-capitalism and anarchism agree on is the abolition of the state. However many anarchists would argue that unregulated capitalism will lead to tyranny, hierarchy , and authoritarianism such as in the Belgian Congo and British East India where famines and genocides were the norm despite no state oversight. If anything unrestrained capitalism could be argued to be more dangerous than statism, though less stable and likely to last.

[@WeegeeSlayer123]

@@aimless836 I'll just take regular capitalism over anarchism any day.

[@AllieBorse]

I find myself agreeing with aspects of anarco-syndicalism, social anarchism and egoism

[@KarlSnarks]

The nice thing is, they're all compatible ;)

[@Grundrisse]

An-Syndicalism is a social anarchism (even the Wiki page for which that this video repeats doesn't deny it). As for egoism, it's a lot more complex than the common portrayal. For instance, the egoism articulated by Stirner is not an "ism" about the "ego." He never once uses "ego" as the biggest misconception about him says - he uses egoism and egoist because they existed as words, but the term he uses is Unique (Einzige). There is no "ism," no statement about what should be (what is thinkable), what is true or right, or what should be done in order to be a "good" egoist. Neither does this "egoism" have any fixed relations to any ideology, and as such, egoism is not limited to leftist anarchism. >The only meanings, aims, purposes, and universes are the very ephemeral, transient ones that individuals create for themselves. In the face of this overall absurdity, you could choose to ignore it and assume the universality of your own meanings, thus becoming what Stirner called a “duped egoist”; this is the path typical of the religious --Intro to The Unique and Its Property by Stirner

[@raresboghean2974]

Seen in the west

[@Bonny-d5u]

I'm an anarcho capitalist

[@anarchorama]

I love how this list excluded ancaps LMAO

[@BrofessorStein]

@@anarchorama that's covered in my video on capitalism types. Go check out the channel 👍

[@aaponorrbacka5571]

Big W

[@NameWithheld999]

Rothbard himself said anCaps aren’t anarchist.

[@zephlodwick1009]

I'm not an anarchist, but capitalist property rights allow for bodies to amass power over a territory and those living there that greatly resemble a state, charging to live there, like taxes. Even if you can willingly leave, you can't go onto somebody else's land without their approval, just as with modern countries. And even if there's unclaimed land, you can live in the woods that are claimed by, but not controlled by, the state, like the Unabomber and Chris McCandless.

[@SxGxNoise]

That's because it's not anarchy 😂

[@SxGxNoise]

As a Anarchist I appreciate you creating this video for the masses explaining to people how Anarchist mentally isn't evil! Shure all styles of government has ups and downs but Anarchy worked for years in a lot of countrys and a few country to this day are socialist.... What I mean to say without yapping too much is that Anarchy is the way.

[@giulioB__88]

In "a lot of countries" ? Like?

[@ViraL_FootprinT.ex.e]

I'm currently reading a book on anarcho-syndicalism now. This popped up at the right time.

[@jakobhoward2287]

no matter what specific politics an anarchist takes, there is no monolithic path to anarchy. anarchism is a means with multiple end goals, and the only way to overcome intrinsic division within anarchist thought and action, is to realize the nonsectarian prospects of anarchy outweigh the mono-repression of a universal and holistic discussion and progression of such a movement. it's like what Subcommandante Marcos said: “Yes, Marcos is gay. Marcos is gay in San Francisco, black in South Africa, an Asian in Europe, a Chicano in San Ysidro, an anarchist in Spain, a Palestinian in Israel, a Mayan Indian in the streets of San Cristobal, a Jew in Germany, a Gypsy in Poland, a Mohawk in Quebec, a pacifist in Bosnia, a single woman on the Metro at 10pm, a peasant without land, a gang member in the slums, an unemployed worker, an unhappy student and, of course, a Zapatista in the mountains. Marcos is all the exploited, marginalized, oppressed minorities resisting and saying `Enough'. He is every minority who is now beginning to speak and every majority that must shut up and listen. He is every untolerated group searching for a way to speak. Everything that makes power and the good consciences of those in power uncomfortable -- this is Marcos.” Quintessentially what Marcos is agonizing here is that exact realization, anti-democratic top-down repression has no legitimacy, especially not in anarchism and even non-anarchism. (I would say though that Anarcho-capitalism are just the same psuedolibertarians on the right-wing, since "libertarianism" had it origins in anarchist-communist French thought)

[@clubert]

Liberalism

[@tugalord]

@@jakobhoward2287 proudhon was not a communist, in fact he despised Marxism and even was critical of collectivist forms of anarchism. People forget that when Proudhon said "Property is theft" he was talking about property taken by force (which was normal in europe at the time when nobility took land without buying it or, because he also said "Property is Liberty", he later explained the distinction between the 2 forms of property, an ancap would agree with those statements. The only real difference between anarcho capitalism and Mutualism/Individualist anarchism is in economics. Also, words for political ideologies change as the political reality changes, if someone claimed i was a democrat while holding the same ideas of the democratic party of 1865 no one would take said person seriously

[@jakobhoward2287]

@@tugalord true! And he is claimed as the “Father of Anarchism” when contemporarily he’s known as a mutualist. It’s important to keep in mind the fluctuations of anarchist history. But without a doubt, he was anti-authoritarian (and a socialist for that matter), which is equidistant to anarchism to some degree, same as left-libertarianism. However, one discrepancy is he’s pro-free market, which wouldn’t have been severely worrying in his time, however its worry in our time, plus his social stances (on women and Jewish groups) aren’t quite progressive. But ultimately I think the best way to reconnoiter and support anarchism (and anarchism-adjacent philosophy) is to keep a critical mind and talk about what’s wrong and what can be right and progressive for everyone, without hierarchy or statism muddying the waters.

[@jakobhoward2287]

@@clubert liberalism and anarchism aren’t directly compatible, even if all political ideologies and philosophies derived from classical liberalism (when it was considered leftward for its time), contemporarily, liberalism is overtly state-dependent, especially in its new shape (neoliberalism)

[@ONEisN0THING]

I used to be an anarchist. The Zapistas are heroes. But they cannot win. Foreign intervention. Invasions. A lack of a military. You gave a passionate speech...but very little of it would have convinced others. That was agitational. It only works for anarchists. You cannot defeat the imperialists. Your vunerable to cults, manipulation, An-caps (Which are actually more exploitative than traditional capitalism) and anarcho Nihilists (of which I used to be one, with ecoist tendencies). Im not trying to make you like being ordered around like a dog. Im pleading with you to think this through. How will other countries react? How will you create a rebellion with out co-ordinated action (please research warfare). Your a good person. But please dear gods. Chaos is unstable by nature. You can see the end goal, but butyour methods to reach it will only get us killed and villainised, if you dont abandon them in the class war (Ukraine during the October revolution for example) out of neccesity. Please drop this anti democratic petty bourgeouis madness before people are killed. You should look into Trotskyism. Its a communist enemy of Stalinisms tyranny. We are not Red faschists. We are your friends and comrades. We are a peoples army

[@stzrodzsenquiz]

Socialist Anarchism, Mutualism, Synthesis, Cyber & Transhumanist anarchism really do it for me. I believe they are very possible and ideal.

[@l4zrh4wk]

Primitivism anarchism is what I truly believe but don’t have the courage to follow through with. The work it would require to obtain the skills needed to survive like our ancestors just seems beyond me. It is a shame we’re stuck on an endless treadmill, just like our parents and their parents before them. Where was my choice to opt in to this? Where was there’s? Most people can’t even comprehend a life without the 9-5 Mon-Fri grind.

[@BrofessorStein]

@@l4zrh4wk The 9-5 grind is madness yeah...I guess in some parts of the world you could try to live this way, if you got your hunting skills straight 🧐

[@j-davis7290]

Living in the ozarks for a year proved to me that I A: could do it B: no longer wished to after the 2nd winter (started in January 2021) & C: coming back to civilization after a year away is equally refreshing and horrifically soul crushing

[@ssg9offical]

Needed this.

[@gerttherude6366]

I used to think I was egoist , but only the part about taking responsibility for ones self, but I'm definitely anrarco syndicalist at heart :) Workers Rights!

[@xoutsideraspakavinatigo2650]

Well, I do not know why you would think it is bad to take responsibility for your self’s actions. But If that’s because you interpret that meaning to be obedient or responsible in your actions and do What’s considered “good”, that is not What is meant at all. It’s all about the Individual again, Stirner was all about it, “being responsible for one’s self” basically means “I rob a bank, I am either prepared to do so successfully and have done the needed measures to prepare for my self’s success, or I am reconciled (in the case of failure) with the fact that I am responsible for not succeeding and for the authorities striking me down. Basically being responsible for one’s self and being an Egoist as a whole basically means “Do everything you want like a Karen, but recognize that you are not entitled to it like the Karen thinks she is, but that you Get entitlement through succeeding in doing whatever you want, whether by plan, luck or skill or might.”. It means basically “Do whatever you want - just don’t cry for yourself when it backfires on you, plan it through, or suffer being responsible for your doom - for your self’s doom”

[@DefinitelySpirit]

I think youre your own anarchist. Because thats the entire point, you dont have to subscribe to any specific type. No rulers.

[@NotMe-f5l]

You forgot the best one, anarcho totalitarianism…

[@BrofessorStein]

That sounds like a VERY odd one, still interesting.

[@anarcho-savagery2097]

It's because it doesn't exist.

[@Ollyatlas]

​@@anarcho-savagery2097 authoritarianism means absolute control with no compromise towards the people or anyone working with the dictators Anarchism means little to no government or control

[@anarcho-savagery2097]

@Ollyatlas Anarchism literally means No Rulers. So it's oxymoronic for an ideology that professes to have no rulers and to not rule over others, as being despotic in their ways of governing.

[@Larzang]

The theory of "Totalitarian Anarchism", or Nihilist Anarcho-Tyranny is too silly of a concept to be an actual ideology for people. Rather, it's just mental illness. Think of it as a state of fundamental chaos and discord that potentially exists in the wake of an apocalyptic event.. But it also has absolutely jack s#!+ to do with actual Anarchism, though. Case closed.

[@augustopenaspalmeira471]

thanks for not including ancap since it's not real anarchism. also individualists are not against socialism.

[@xAmrok]

ancap is the only true form of anarchism since it is the only one to be fully based off of the voluntary actions of acting man, therefore achieving the state of anarchy which can be directly translated into "no rulers" and also any form of anarcho-socialism is an oxymoron

[@WeegeeSlayer123]

How is anarcho capitalism not real anarchism?

[@augustopenaspalmeira471]

@@WeegeeSlayer123 "We must therefore turn to history for enlightenment; here we find that none of the proclaimed anarchist groups correspond to the libertarian position, that even the best of them have unrealistic and socialistic elements in their doctrines. Furthermore, we find that all of the current anarchists are irrational collectivists, and therefore at opposite poles from our position. We must therefore conclude that we are not anarchists, and that those who call us anarchists are not on firm etymological ground, and are being completely unhistorical."- Murray Rothbard

[@costantinochianale4904]

@@WeegeeSlayer123 Real anarchism is all about opposing non consensual hierarchies, libertarians fail to realize the inherently coercive nature of capitalism.

[@WeegeeSlayer123]

@@costantinochianale4904 But with capitalism, I'm my own boss making my own capital.

[@zakialmahin7278]

Do one about every type of authoratarianism include both right winged, leftist and moderate ones.

[@BrofessorStein]

Interesting, thanks for the suggestion.

[@ZeusAmun-pt9dc]

In my most humble yet accurate opinion the only form of anarchy is primitive anarchy

[@anarchytelevision8445]

Honestly all these classifications that you have talked about has diluted the true meaning of true Anarchy

[@BrofessorStein]

@@anarchytelevision8445 well, I didn't come up with these...

[@goatpapayt2294]

No they don't most of these are true to anarchism just with a focus on a specific subject

[@anarchytelevision8445]

@goatpapayt2294 there's no need for that and it does dilute the true meaning of true Anarchy

[@Daytona666]

@@anarchytelevision8445 whats the "true" meaning of anarchy

[@beningumi4311]

Thank you so much for this!

[@BrofessorStein]

Happy I could help!

[@Piratewaffle43]

Categorizing anarchism isn't very anarchistic!

[@dectroia]

Mutualism seems quite good, I’d probably be that if I was an anarchist

[@MiserableMuon]

As a mutualist, I can confirm.

[@ThePathOfEudaimonia]

I identify most with Social Anarchism, Social Ecology (not on this list), and Anarcho-Transhumanism. Mutualist economics may become a certain transition period, but Anarcho-communism would be a better thing to aim towards, partly driven by highly advanced technology and automation to improve everyone's needs and general well-being for the flourishing of all.

[@BrofessorStein]

Transhumanism for real? That sounds scary...

[@ThePathOfEudaimonia]

@BrofessorStein What do you find scary specifically? We have always used technology to improve our lives and bodies in particular ways. We use glasses or contact lenses to improve our eyesight. We build prostethics for several external and internal bodyparts in medicine. We could use genetic modification to eliminate various harmful or deadly diseases, we could connect our minds more effectively to virtual worlds (N.B. more than we already are with our digital phones and virtual worlds right now!). In certain ways many of us already are implicit transhumanists. We should of course keep discussing which technologies would be (un)desirable and (un)ethical, etc., and those discussions are highly essential for the future of humanity and technology in general, but why being scared for every technology which could improve our human body and mind from the get go?

[@BrofessorStein]

@ThePathOfEudaimonia as long as technology is used ethically and not for more governmental control.

[@ThePathOfEudaimonia]

@BrofessorStein Yes, that's exactly what Anarcho-Transhumanism is all about! It's about improving people's lives, freedom and well-being within a horizontal power structure, against domination, exploitation and coercion.

[@ThePathOfEudaimonia]

@@BrofessorStein I would even say that if we not promote the use of technology and technological augmentation within a horizontal power structure by anarcho-transhumanists, this technological progress will definitely be used unethically by powerful states and individuals. A lot in the transhumanist space are libertarian right I'm sad to say.

[@MiserableMuon]

You mentioned and talked about mutualism but forgot to include Proudhon in it? the guy who literally started the anarchist movement and developed the theory of mutualism?

[@ptrck_]

I'm happy to see that someone commented on that

[@Tommy-the-coffee-addict]

One issue is that many Market anarchists also draws heavily form Austrian economics, which is a big omission.

[@MiserableMuon]

@@Tommy-the-coffee-addict I don't think it's terrible that market anarchists do sometimes draw from Austrian economics. Remember, there's no strict dogma in the anarchist literature that states you can't use the economics of opposition into your own theories. The way I see it, it's even better to draw from Austrian economics. It just goes to show that you can reach socialist conclusions from any form of economic school of thought, as long as you are not dogmatically attempting to apologize for capitalism. Which is sadly the case with almost all of the Austrian economists.

[@Tommy-the-coffee-addict]

@MiserableMuon the issue is with the video. I like Austrian econ.

[@Tommy-the-coffee-addict]

@@MiserableMuon id also add that the main difference between capitalist and non-capitalist austrian econ is a different definition of capitalism. The first sees capitalism as just a free market, the second views it as control over society by capitalists (usually with the help of government coercion)

[@davidlewis6728]

@@Tommy-the-coffee-addict either a capitalist is anyone that owns capital, and since money is a form of capital, literally everyone that engages in voluntary exchange controls the economy under capitalism, or capitalism is the advocacy of individual, ie: "private" ownership of capital, in which case the state's existence violates an individual's right to fully own their property. even the earliest uses of the term, coined by socialists, conforms to these definitions, so idk why there's so much confusion and vitriol here.

[@missk1697]

You could do one on every type of totalitarianism - Including the most based one, totalitarian transhumanism. One State marches on!

[@BrofessorStein]

Noted, thanks!

[@yu-gi-broke8823]

I like how under each of these videos you comment the most absurd and disturbing political belief. W

[@scp-4093]

is that a RED FLOOD REFERENCE

[@YouLoveMrFriendly]

What's the difference between market anarchism and anarcho capitalism?

[@BrofessorStein]

Check my video on all capitalism types, I covered anarcho capitalism there.

[@YouLoveMrFriendly]

@BrofessorStein thanks

[@augustopenaspalmeira471]

@@YouLoveMrFriendly market anarchism is socialist because property is socialized and controled by workers. but instead of planning the economy they resort to markets

[@YouLoveMrFriendly]

@augustopenaspalmeira471 sounds like worker cooperatives.

[@bobobo672]

@@YouLoveMrFriendly Something like that. There's a difference between market-anarchism and "anarcho"-capitalism because the thing that makes a system either capitalist or socialist isn't weather markets exist or not (markets have existed long before capitalism has), but rather peoples relations to the means of production. If a society has a class that owns the means of production, and a class that labors, selling it's work-force as a commodity to the owners, it's capitalist (even if there are no markets, somehow). If a society has no class distinctions, because the people who own the means of production are the same people who labor, then it's socialist (even if markets exist).

[@_c3a3m_88]

Just curious, you mentioned individualist anarchism but didn’t do a segment on it, how come?

[@BrofessorStein]

Since it's kinda already covered by the Egoist type and it overlaps with others.

[@_c3a3m_88]

@@BrofessorStein aren’t there key differences between egoism and individualism? I’m still new on this but from what I’ve researched it seems more like egoism is about putting your needs above others whereas individualism (and by extension individualist anarchism) revolves around simply recognizing your own needs separate from the needs of others or how others perceive your needs to be

[@Dumdummakhno]

while this is not all anarchism this is a good video

[@Ollyatlas]

Do every fictional political ideology/theory

[@BrofessorStein]

Noted down on the list, thanks buddy! Got 1-2 examples so I get an idea of what you mean exactly?

[@Ollyatlas]

@@BrofessorStein ingsoc and armstrongism (metal gear solid) as just 2 examples

[@Sarez____-it4ks]

​@@BrofessorStein Human supremacy. It's not very specific but it happens a lot in genres where societies of different species are present like in sci-fi or fantasy settings.

[@Ollyatlas]

@Sarez____-it4ks best example of that is the imperium in the 40k with the extremes there In most sci fi settings that ideology is difficult to see especially somewhere like star wars where sure there are racists but usually either the republic is corrupt or the sith use hate to their advantage But with the imperium it's obvious since most humans in 40k are brainwashed into being fashi$t anyway

[@Ollyatlas]

​@Sarez____-it4ks that as an ideology is most obvious in 40k as "human imperiumism" and chaos undivided under abaddons leadership

[@NormanTheDummy_YouTube]

I've been told that anarchism is far-right communism and far-left socialism at the same time Guys.... I know it's not far right communism

[@Psychohistorian42]

Erm... no. No it's not.

[@NormanTheDummy_YouTube]

@Psychohistorian42 ik

[@bobobo672]

I'm sorry... "far-right COMMUNISM"? WHAT?

[@Psychohistorian42]

@bobobo672 there was a few people claiming to be MAGA Communist on Twitter about a year ago. I don't know if 1) it wasn't just one guy, and 2) If they were serious. but I do know they made it on Truth social and made them angry for a bit.

[@NormanTheDummy_YouTube]

@@bobobo672 I know it's not far-right communism

[@lamalama9717]

What about PLATFORMISM? If you mention Synthesists, it's worth talking about this other approach.

[@kupeart3746]

What about anarcho fascism?

[@ezrastardust3124]

The more I research into it, the more I find myself agreeing with anarcho-socialist and anarcho-syndicalist ideals Add a splash of solarpunk and queer anarchism in there and you basically have my worldview in a nutshell 😅

[@jravage77]

You could change the name of this video to, "Why the writing at Marvel Ent and Lucas Arts sucks".

[@BrofessorStein]

😂

[@crimsonfury7811]

Does these anarchist go along with one another? because once idea can be problematic to another

[@BrofessorStein]

Good question 😂

[@Antifa_Alex]

Anarchism is like an ocean with a lot of different schools of fish swimming around.

[@Er1k.161]

»¡Viva el Frente Popular! ¡Viva la unión de todos los antifascistas! ¡Viva la República del pueblo! ¡Los fascistas no pasarán! ¡No pasarán!« -Dolores Ibárruri

[@ballhu-yv8nn]

Can we talk about liberalism and conservatism?

[@BrofessorStein]

Noted, thanks.

[@changingpeopleslivesmoon2993]

Interested

[@BrofessorStein]

Glad you like it!

[@LunaticoniSolar]

Mutualism seems to be fine

[@sixevensage7004]

I believe in alot of these types. Im anarchist?!

[@BrofessorStein]

Apparently ☕

[@user-tk2jy8xr8b]

Since when "anarkizem" became "anartshizem"?

[@BrofessorStein]

Did I mispronounce again. Flipping egg....I'm an English noob sorry buddy

[@CosmoShidan]

To an order without power!

[@marinaodo]

Egoism is the best

[@sippxn]

Buh based

[@pizza8725]

Anarcho Transhumanism is actually the best ideology ever

[@BrofessorStein]

Sounds scary. Transhumanism is just too much I think

[@Олександр-к6о2л]

Green

[@Beveo-xd8bc]

Primitivist are based

[@klarensbelfiore]

Where is religious anarchy?

[@deathsinger1192]

Clear Morals enforced by noone and left at the individuals choice. That's how it should be

[@Ollyatlas]

5:23 what about tape and murdr and assault?

[@klunni6834]

They’d be morally reprehensible even if they were legal

[@somedesertdude1308]

morals

[@Ollyatlas]

@klunni6834 personally in the illegalist Case I can understand graffiti and theft against the wealthy and other petty crimes as rebellious acts But stealing from someone with not much to spare or any violent crimes I can't see those as rebellious or anything moral by any good standards

[@Ollyatlas]

@@somedesertdude1308 agreed

[@klunni6834]

@@Ollyatlas most illegalists wouldn’t steal from someone else who doesn’t have much because that’s immoral as opposed to stealing from a Walmart or an upperclassoid

[@uwayn9829]

Where tf is anarcho communism ? The most popular ?

[@BrofessorStein]

Covered in our video about Communism types, check out the channel

[@Douli218]

There’s no such thing as socialist anarchism, as anarchism in the orthodox sense is socialist inherently.

[@Antifa_Alex]

I’d argue that libertarian socialism (anarcho-communism) is a school of anarchist thought.

[@Douli218]

@ yeah it’s a school of socialism is what I’m saying

[@mutecommercials]

wait, where's anacho-capitalism lol j/k

[@BrofessorStein]

Coming up in a separate video ☕☕

[@Lylactal]

where is anarcho fascism?

[@Kys_ws]

Anarchism is based on anti hierchy and facism is from his nature based on hierarchy like ancap you're just want to sound leftist but having the most hateble speach ever

[@KarlSnarks]

Where is dry water? Where is religious atheism?

[@BrofessorStein]

😂☕

[@Nicky_Savage]

​@@KarlSnarksI don't know about dry water. But dry ice exist.

[@Nicky_Savage]

Perfect system doesn't exis... 2:12

[@MrTod1984]

Where is voluntaryism and right market anarchism like Ancap or agorism

[@BrofessorStein]

@@MrTod1984 voluntaryism doesn't fall under anarchism, since the "founder" rejected anarchy. Ancap will be covered in a video about capitalism

[@MrTod1984]

@@BrofessorStein When the founder was alive anarchism was only left-wing no? He did not want to associate with communism. Right anarchy was established in the mid-20th century. The belief that every human interaction should be consensual is extremely anarchistic.

[@goatpapayt2294]

​@@MrTod1984 there is no such thing as right anarchism. It just doesn't exist. If your think ancaps they aren't anarchists. Capitalism requires a state to function and if you somehow had a anarchist world with corporations those corporations would become the state

[@000-v7j]

@goatpapayt2294 It literally doesn't, The Free Market and State are basically opposites, making the argument "corporations would become the state" disregards the fact that in a free market competition is occurring at all times preventing natural monopolies, in fact there was a small "republic" before anarcho-capitalism was a concept that functioned very similarly and lasted 400 years before peacefully fading back into Italy, it had free markets, no state, no monopolies (which yes the world has changed but the point still stands in a sense) what CAN be said, is that anarchism logically cannot be paired with any socialist/communism ideology since they pipeline into having a state nearly instantly, in fact anarchism in its truest sense can't exist because hierarchy is naturally forming so I'd rather have a 50/50 with AnCap than a 100% with anarchism for state formation (this doesn't count Hoppeanism which is good at fixing AnCap flaws)

[@ReboyGTR]

*You're either a teenager or you never became an adult.*

[@000-v7j]

?

[@royalexisflys]

Here is feudalism !

[@BrofessorStein]

What about it?

[@Gustavo1500Soares]

Where is Agorism? Anarcho Capitalism? Voluntaryism?

[@BrofessorStein]

Agorism falls under Free-Market Anarchism (subform of it), Anarcho Capitalism is rather something for a video on capitalism. For the last one: Apparently the founder rejected anarchism.

[@tugalord]

​@@BrofessorSteineven if rejected by leftist anarchism, anarcho capitalism just mixes individualist anarchism with austrian economics. They still have the same base idea, the difference being economic theory. Anarcho communism on the other hand is much further to proudhon's and tucker's ideas than what Rothbard or Hoppe believe.

[@mythrum]

Not anarchist as they dont reject hierarchy

[@KarlSnarks]

anarcho-capitalism and voluntaryism aren't anarchist philosophies as they do not oppose hierarchy. They also come from an entirely different philosophical tradition. Agorism falls under market-anarchism and illegalism as I understand it.

[@tugalord]

@@mythrum you simply cannot do away with hirearchy, its litterally impossible

[@lnfinite_Mind]

Like half of these ideologies fall flat on their face when you do even the slightest amount of thinking. The only ones that are actually plausible are anarcho-mutualism, anarcho-communism and anarcho-syndicalism. Even then, you need a state apparatus for basic functions like courts and defense. (Then again, one will develop in the form of warlordism). Anarchist societies never lasted long throughout history due to them being overtaken by a larger power.

[@BrofessorStein]

Yeah I guess the disorganization would be the downfall of an anarchist society. power vacuums get filled quickly.

[@whatburnsneverreturns]

uh thats not true. cospaia lasted centuries

[@lnfinite_Mind]

@@whatburnsneverreturns they started off as a mapping error and was only kept around because they were a buffer zone between the Papal states and the Grand Duchy of Tuscany. They were protected by the larger power’s militaries. You could have at least brought up the Zapatistas (Which their territory still has laws and are more traditionalist and religious compared to the wider Anarchist movement in the west). Anarchism just never works, it’s been proven with the Anarchists in Spain and the Ukrainian black army. Both times they were swallowed up by their more aggressive and more totalitarian leftist factions.

[@bobobo672]

The Mbuti tribe has an anarchic lifestyle and we know that they've been around for 2,000 years at least. And no, that's not due to isolation, as they've repeatedly throughout their history come in contact with their neighboring civilizations, from kingdoms, to african empires, to colonialist empires, to modern nation-states. Through all of this, they still maintain their anarchic way of life.

[@lnfinite_Mind]

@@bobobo672 and many of them have to live in refugee camps (created by the Congolese government) to prevent other groups in that area from killing their people. A few members from the tribe are actually trying to pass a law called the “Organic law on the fundamental principles of protection and promotion of Indigenous Pygmy People’s rights”, starting in 2008. Anarchist states need protection from a larger entity such as a government.

[@Diskaria]

Most of them are characteristics of anarchism??... and the rest of them are like clown anarchism (totalitarianism and stuff)

[@BrofessorStein]

@@Diskaria these are all subtypes of anarchism yes

[@Antifa_Alex]

Anarchism at its core is the rejection of coercive hierarchies and associations.

[@alexsm3882]

Where tf is anarcho-capitalism dude 😂

[@BrofessorStein]

In my video on Capitalism types

[@dardak800]

Bruh, where is Rothbardianism?

[@BrofessorStein]

Missed that one, never heard of it

[@dardak800]

@@BrofessorStein That’s anarchocapitalism

[@diamond_zone]

I agree with most of these types of anarchism except feminist anarchism in the modern society and illegalism

[@alexleblanc2775]

How can you possibly disagree with feminist anarchism

[@diamond_zone]

@@alexleblanc2775 mostly because of how feminism has currently shifted from equality to appropriating the abuse towards men by women

[@alexleblanc2775]

@@diamond_zoneI think you’re most likely very wrapped up in the online space bc in academia feminism is one of the most important lenses in order to look at history and the voicelessness of women throughout it. Feminism is a practice of understanding how patriarchy affects everything, which it does, and it will continue to do so until it does not exist anymore. You need feminists and feminist theory to understand that and if you don’t understand that you’ve gotten lost along the way.

[@diamond_zone]

@@alexleblanc2775 I'm not denying the history of feminism and how it positively influenced the U.S, heck I used to be one also, but I noticed a shift from positive change to dominance after the hashtag kill all men thing. I stopped believing in feminism ever since then. I made a whole speech about it for a college class. I explained how and when feminism came up and how positive it was, and I also criticized it because of the message from current feminism. If feminism didn't turn out like that, I would definitely still be a feminist and agree with it. But hey, something good can always spoil when the wrong person has ulterior motives for it

[@alexleblanc2775]

@@diamond_zonefeminism does not exist as an anti-man movement and it never has. That “kill all men thing” was a tiny group of dumb radical feminists attempting to agitate. 95% of feminists are fighting the same fight they always have which is to have women recognized within society and history as a whole and to dismantle the patriarchy which defines our current society

[@jonnylee733]

“Insurrectionary anarchism is a revolutionary approach” “Egoist anarchism is a philosophy” “People *should* act on their self interest” Please do your research before making a KZbin video, I’m not even watching the rest

[@TrafficPartyHatTest]

may I ask why these statements are wrong in this context?

[@theMultiJawee]

As an anarchist I couldn’t finish this video because these philosophies are so cringe. No disrespect to the creator, you do wonderful work, but anarchism is very simple. If you’re an anarchist and not a socialist, you’re a clown. The great forebears of anarchism laid out clearly that it was an approach to socialism. Get over whatever happened when you were a kid and understand that even an anti-authoritarian approach to worker control and redistribution is going to include leadership and organization. The only people who have had any success with anarchism understood this. If you’re a primitivisit, an individualist, whatever other clown shoes ass thing you wanna attribute to anarchism, definite it some other way.

[@BrofessorStein]

Glad you enjoyed the video

[@jamestipton3342]

You also forgot Christian Anarchism.

[@mythrum]

Typically Anarcho-Pacifism and Christian Anarchism work together

[@American_Nationalist]

All suck

[@scienceandfuturetech4707]

You forgot anarcho capitalism and anarcho communism

[@BrofessorStein]

Anarcho Capitalism is more capitalism leaned, anarcho communism was covered in our communism video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/mnaWZWCapNuNb5Y

[@Er1k.161]

Most anarchisms are communist. Communism (as described by Marx and Engels) are is the same as what anarchists strive for: moneyless, classless, stateless society Anarcho-communism is an umberella term.

[@JustinBlades-s2v]

Wtf is a pacifist anarchist? Is that just a billionaire with a 20 in charisma?

[@BrofessorStein]

😂😂

[@JustinBlades-s2v]

@@BrofessorStein pacifist anarchy is a pair of crying laugh emoji's?

[@NoSi_420]

Is market anarchism anarcho capitalism? Cause if it is then you didn't describe it right, and if it isn't then it should be there

[@KarlSnarks]

No, market anarchism is distinct from anarcho-capitalism, as market anarchists reject private property and want a market economy with individual and worker ownership of production (so you'd have people with a one-man firm, or a worker cooperative, but not a company with an owner/share holders and wage laborers.).

[@sergentsauce210]

anarcho capitalism cannot be anarchist.

[@BrofessorStein]

No it's not. Anarcho Capitalism will be included in a separate video on capitalism.

[@000-v7j]

@@sergentsauce210 It can, it lies in how the left vs right define anarchist

[@placek3610]

All of those are tomfoolery

[@rightwingpowerr]

bruh forgot the most important one...

[@BrofessorStein]

Which one?

[@rightwingpowerr]

@@BrofessorStein I was talking about anarchocapitalism, but u forgot agorism, anarchomonarchism etc too

[@mythrum]

@@rightwingpowerrNo way are you calling anarcho-capitaism “the most important” when its not even anarchist

[@bobobo672]

@@mythrum I mean, they unironically mentioned "anarcho" monarchism, so "anarcho" capitalism seems pretty normal for them to adhere to lol

[@lordofthefemboys]

@@mythrumall anarchism is is not believing in a government

[@Tommy_Milfiger]

😂😂😂

[@Theocracy-Enthusiast]

Im not a fan of anarchism but if i was a anarchist i would be primitive one because it would be pretty funny to be a caveman

[@slipstick985]

Anarchism is an anachronism. Government is where it's at.

[@nikitasimonsen1459]

You forgot liberterian anarchism, national-anarchism, monarcho-anarchism, minarchism to name a few. Very left leaned chart of anarcism subtypes.

[@BrofessorStein]

@@nikitasimonsen1459 interesting subtypes for sure, thanks for the addition. The National one I covered in my video about fascism subtypes as a neo-fascist one. The Monarcho one sounds like a paradox?

[@missk1697]

What the hell is "libertarian anarchism"? Libertarians want a minimal state while anarchists seek to abolish it altogether. If you truly merged these two it would just be minarchism.

[@tugalord]

​@@missk1697anarcho capitalism

[@nikitasimonsen1459]

@@BrofessorStein in monarcho anarchism monarch is the garant of common law. Has a function as a defwnder of law, nothing more. Like a sheriff, but with the hereditary function so there would be no power struggle.

[@nikitasimonsen1459]

@@missk1697 other name for libertarian anarchism is anarcho-capitalism, but I prefer just libertarianism. I am one myself

[@CTzons]

0:01 The same people that complain about men's sitting positions and men explaining things to women 🙄

[@BrofessorStein]

[@bobobo672]

😂 I promise you that there's a very big difference between liberal-feminism/pop-feminism and anarcha-feminism

[@4share643]

It's stupid that you'd say about each group "they oppose the state" and then "they oppose Capitalism". Those are contradicting. Capitalism IS the abolition of the state. The free market means a government does not interfere with the economy.

[@TrafficPartyHatTest]

the state capitalism in question:

[@ArmandoEnfectana-bp6jo]

Bro, the only anarchism that is respect is the Pacifist version, but I don't respect the other version because it is nothing but a Atheistic Wokest Shenanigans, yeah Atheist Wokest are the only one will love people to go back in Unga dunga Era.

[@BrofessorStein]

Unga dunga ☕😂😂

[@bobobo672]

...what?

[@ArmandoEnfectana-bp6jo]

@@bobobo672, Caveman Era

[@bobobo672]

@@ArmandoEnfectana-bp6jo but most anarchists are not primitivists

[@ArmandoEnfectana-bp6jo]

@bobobo672 , I know but did you know what Anarchist is, they are trying to destroy the fuckin Government and this will put us in regression, why? Without a fuckin Government that will maintain the country, innovations and Technology can't be keep will or managed, so anarchist just put us in the time of Unga Dunga Era.

[@braziliantsar]

Bro where is anarchofascism

[@BrofessorStein]

Check out the video on Fascism types, I think I covered it there

[@bobobo672]

Too self-contradictory for this video

[@Sinfuldeathband]

Where’s anarcho capitalism

[@Larzang]

It's "Anarchist" in name only, that's why. Capitalism is fundamentally antithetical and incompatible with actual Anarchist principle.

[@KarlSnarks]

not actually anarchist, so not in the chart.

[@Sinfuldeathband]

@@KarlSnarks in what way is not anarchist

[@BrofessorStein]

Will be covered in a video on capitalism types

[@silverdoctor6298]

​@@Sinfuldeathband Companies would became the state, that's why virtually every "anarchism" is anti-capitalist

[@Iron_Wyvern]

More like "Every type of worthless, dead end ideology" lmao ROASTED

[@bobhoskins124]

At this point its all dead end ideology. Humans are just too institutionalized to evolve. Evolution comes from hardship.

[@shadowfighter8861]

This isn't a capitalist or fascist compilation, you confused little authoritarianist.

[@Sarez____-it4ks]

It's over Anarbros, @Iron_Wyvem has dismantled this centuries old school of thought completely. Time to support the great leviathan in the dominion of the people instead.

[@systemsless]

Silly ideas, only authority works

[@goatpapayt2294]

Silly idea that you need authority to live your life

[@wiry64]

Anarcho-Capitalism is not included but Queer Anarchism is?

[@BrofessorStein]

That's more capitalism, and will be covered in a separate video on capitalism.

[@wiry64]

@@BrofessorStein Alright, thank you!

[@jamestipton3342]

And Anarcho-capitalism.

[@BrofessorStein]

Will be covered in a separate video on capitalism soon