cant believe Anarcho-Primitive-Totalitarian-Pacifism isnt on here
@DynMorgannwg5 ай бұрын
I know, such an oversight
@BrofessorStein5 ай бұрын
That's gonna be covered in the video about Pacifism types.
@JohnnyAngel7775 ай бұрын
@@bomx-w2q *_auch kein Faschismus... stellen Sie sich vor_*
@bomx-w2q5 ай бұрын
@@BrofessorStein ggwp, gotta love my bros from the anarcho-syndicalist empire of new baltics, bringing it to the doom with the new belarussian totalitarianism on the world stage 🥰
@BrofessorStein5 ай бұрын
@@JohnnyAngel777 will be covered in a separate video
@IanHelmick-yp5eu4 ай бұрын
No 10 minute intro talking about what your about to talk about before you talk about it. Straight to the point. 10/10
@BrofessorStein4 ай бұрын
@@IanHelmick-yp5eu thanks for watching Ian
@christophersnedeker5 ай бұрын
One point to make is in socialist jargon private property refers only to private businesses. Not your personal possessions.
@BrofessorStein5 ай бұрын
True, I should have clarified this a bit more.
@Mickeymoon-j2x4 ай бұрын
Why not personal estate?
@zevnduck99044 ай бұрын
@@Mickeymoon-j2x personal estate by the mean of a mansion or just your average home?
@social_redd_4 ай бұрын
@@zevnduck9904if you genuinely lived in that mansion and no other home then yeah, personal property
@zevnduck99044 ай бұрын
@@social_redd_ Just the mansion, not surrounding land
@santi26835 ай бұрын
Can't believe monarchic socialism with Roman characteristics isn't here 😢
@flintinsects5 ай бұрын
It is... not real socialism...
@santi26835 ай бұрын
@@flintinsects who are you yo tell me what's and what's not, marx? Reactionary.
@justchillin10874 ай бұрын
Ah yes, a la julius ceasar
@seafoxx7772 ай бұрын
@justchillin1087 you joke but there are a bunch of left wingers that think figures like Ceaser and Alexander the Great were left wing
@iwuedfh5 ай бұрын
nice video but as a social democrat myself, despite social democracy being what you explained on paper, in practice, we can barely be considered socialist in my opinion social democracy works in a capitalist society but implements social welfare and social programs with government intervention in forms such as nationalizing key things and making necessities like healthcare universal alongside very strong ties to labour unions BUT they usually stay that way instead of "working towards achieving socialism"
@BrofessorStein5 ай бұрын
@@iwuedfh thanks for watching and your feedback!
@wellingtonsh15 ай бұрын
Many Social Democratic Parties have merged with Christian Democrats or radical socio-liberal egalitarians (such as Rwstou and Rawls).
@Joshua.R.5 ай бұрын
Genuine question. Why not move fully to being a socialist why stay in what my opinion is, a half measure.
@moritz-47425 ай бұрын
Well most social democratic parties were once socialist. Social democrats just got more and more capitalist through actually having power and Realpolitik
@iwuedfh5 ай бұрын
@@Joshua.R. in canada where i live, socialism isn't really a force here so it wouldn't make much sense for me, there is no socialist party in the canadian parliament, there is a social democratic party in canada (called the New Democratic Party) which perfectly align with my views and while they can never get in power, they can get in parliament and influence things from there you see, the ideology of many people is influenced by the country's political climate of where they are from
@Demuu24 ай бұрын
1:39 not everything. Just the means of production such as Factories. Communists aren't going to come for your toothbrush
@byunbaekhyun228326 күн бұрын
yup, toothbrush, or your average home isn't gonna be taken away, it's considered personal property. private property (the one that will be seized) refers to the means of production.
@SpoopySquid4 ай бұрын
Gandhian: Seize the means of production, and by "seize" we mean "launch" and by "the means of production" we mean "the nukes"
@calvraiekcalvraien17 күн бұрын
civ 6 mentioned???
@MiguelMendoza-gm5wj11 күн бұрын
Evil Gandhi be like: 😇
@jerrygu53168 күн бұрын
debunked en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_Gandhi
@MiguelMendoza-gm5wj7 күн бұрын
@@jerrygu5316 everyone knows that site is lib propaganda
@of15643 ай бұрын
Can we really call Socialist Zionism a form of communism? Honestly of all the definitions I looked for in that garbage, really just defines it as National Socialism.
@A.K2.71825 күн бұрын
Zionism is an extremely esoteric ideology anyway, so any hybrid zionist ideology is simply a jewish focused esoteric ideology. In this case, this may aswell be esoteric national socialism (which is bordering esoteric fascism arguably)
@Redscreen-y8e3 ай бұрын
For those who don't know you should probably put a disclaimer about the distinction of private vs personal property, because eliminating private property can imply to some* that nobody can own anything, period, rather than a democratic ownership of production
@Truthlesh96864 ай бұрын
Agrarian Socialism and Marhaenism is the good one in my opinion
@leftistadvocate97184 ай бұрын
syndicalism rejecting feminism? i dont think thats right especially when with the history of the CNT
@herdaconfleclord65974 ай бұрын
yeah that part was weird. It absolutely does not
@NSMexicano20082 ай бұрын
Would be based
@blipblop88810 күн бұрын
@NSMexicano2008 your mom
@NSMexicano20089 күн бұрын
@@blipblop888 So funny
@blipblop8889 күн бұрын
@ i know
@BadgerOfTheSea4 ай бұрын
The inclusion of the British Labour Party's logo for the Zionist one was a pretty funny touch.
@Stodi1945Ай бұрын
But you do realize that this is not the Labour Party's logo, right? It's actually the logo of the Democratic Socialists of America, and I have no idea why the hell the author of this video assigned this logo to Socialist Zionism.
@user-tj9mf2vc6e15 күн бұрын
Socialist Zionism is an oxymoron
@LSSD12925 ай бұрын
Good video. More videos on the variants of other ideologies like nationalism and anarchism could be great
@BrofessorStein5 ай бұрын
Noted, thanks for watching.
@n98795 ай бұрын
That’s basic stuff, there is plenty of information on that
@LSSD12925 ай бұрын
@@n9879 indeed but such videos are interesting
@changingpeopleslivesmoon29935 ай бұрын
For nationalism I think fascism will be a later stage of it
@LSSD12925 ай бұрын
@@changingpeopleslivesmoon2993 it's more of a reactionary, pagan and degenerate version of nationalism imo
@leftistadvocate97184 ай бұрын
don't ask a Ba'athist what they think about non arab workers in the middle east
@beardeodorant76823 ай бұрын
*Antisemitism noises
@byunbaekhyun228326 күн бұрын
@@beardeodorant7682 arabs are also semitic people. so, what do you mean by antisemitism?? be specific.
@DefaultDerrick5 ай бұрын
What about Fabianism?
@BrofessorStein5 ай бұрын
Fair addition I guess.
@CB-yu2tn4 ай бұрын
Social Democracy is NOT socialism
@grenadebuss27142 сағат бұрын
Not 30 seconds into the video and I learned something about my state that I had never heard of. Wow!
@helencoltart34834 ай бұрын
Thanks for this - really interesting and informative
@BrofessorStein4 ай бұрын
Thanks for watching
@Yoldasi4 ай бұрын
Fun Fact: Democratic Socialism was first made in Libya.
@crimsoir35435 ай бұрын
glad to see an explanation of Marhaenism. I tried to find info and materials about it but very few sources
@daltonhall92264 ай бұрын
Great video but as a Tito socialist, I’m quite surprised you didn’t include it Unless I just missed it otherwise pretty good video
@BrofessorStein4 ай бұрын
No I missed Titoism, sorry for that
@daltonhall92264 ай бұрын
@@BrofessorStein you’re good. It’s a very brushed over form of socialism.
@davenasty50854 ай бұрын
I was gonna say, Jugoslavija was one of Socialism’s greatest achievements. Recicemo: Opet Tito, Tito poslja Tita!
@kittenzrulz5 ай бұрын
It doesnt explain syndicalism at all, heck it doesnt even scratch the surface. If anything it just dismisses syndicalism as outdated while focusing on its history and things it shares in common with communism. Why not talk about the unique way that syndicalism structures the economy based on networks of syndicates or the unique structure of syndicates themselves (also calling syndicates "unions" is misleading at best). Also you forgot to mention the Catalonian Anarcho-Syndicalists in the Spanish civil war.
@BrofessorStein5 ай бұрын
This video format cannot cover everything in detail and rather serves as a spark to create interest in the topic. Of course we can't cover such a complex topic in this short amount of time.
@kittenzrulz5 ай бұрын
@@BrofessorStein I understand that however I would have preferred you explain what makes syndicalism unique rather then the similarities and focus on more modern spanish history rather then the older french history.
@BrofessorStein5 ай бұрын
@@kittenzrulz Fair enough.
@Ronor4 ай бұрын
I was also puzzled to ear that syndies are/were anti-feminsit. Idk where it come from lol
@thegrandlord29143 ай бұрын
marhaenism is when marxism actualy become good. instead of denying personal ownership, it's acknowledging it, as long as it didn't harming communal benefit. instead of banning religion, it support it as long as it didn't promoting radicalism, and it is secular. instead of banning private entrepreneurship, it is actualy promoting it as long as it didn't squeezing people for profit (capitalism)
@thegrandlord29142 ай бұрын
@@Robespierre-lI Karl Marx clearly said that religion is an addict that can turn everyone insane. because of this, countries that following marxism tend to banning religion
@thegrandlord29142 ай бұрын
@@Robespierre-lI countries that following marxism usualy banning religion by using what marx told about religion. but, the actual reason for that actualy because religion can become a threat for their political power. vietnam is one example of country that following communism, an ideology that born from marxism, that didn't banning religion. they know that opressing religion can turn religion into political power that can threating vietnamese government position
@jirojhasuo2ndgrandcompany745Ай бұрын
least propagandized rightoid
@baronghede23654 ай бұрын
Pretty fascinating video.
@BrofessorStein4 ай бұрын
@@baronghede2365 glad you liked it
@riverman64625 ай бұрын
Ideologies are like modern day religious denominations
@LordFloofTM5 ай бұрын
A lot of these are more just ideas rather than fully fledged self contained ideologies
@riverman64625 ай бұрын
@@LordFloofTM Some of them. But a whole lot of them existed in some form or another or were quickly abandoned.
@monster_madeline5 ай бұрын
True, hail Marx hail Lenin
@lukaswilhelm92904 ай бұрын
Ideology is just a crippled religion.
@anyoneatall34884 ай бұрын
That spunds like not kniwing what an ideology is nor what a religion is
@JohnSmith-rk7zy4 ай бұрын
10:52 is that a fucking KAISERREICH REFERENCE ?
@danielpaschjr35474 ай бұрын
I'd say that the philosophy of Utopian Socialism was developed by St. Thomas More in his revolutionary treatise Utopia, released in 1511.
@cristianosousa22205 ай бұрын
1:54 in portugal the democratic socialist party (PSD or partido social democratico) is a central-right wing party
@Si_fly5 ай бұрын
Spd in Germany aswell
@cristianosousa22205 ай бұрын
@@Si_fly damn
@Ligma767144 ай бұрын
They mocking about socialism isn't work. But they didn't realize capitalism isn't an absolute or pure capitalism, like in Victoria era. 😂 Mad?
@Verde-s9a14 ай бұрын
Blanqui is very underrated. Some turn towards various forms of Class Collaboration, when disillusioned with the apparent failures of Marxists to move the masses. You don't have to abandon the goal of a collectively-owned society, even when accepting that the workers may be incapable of fulfilling their anticipated role in social change.
@YourFriendlyOfficeAssistantАй бұрын
What about Deng Xiaoping's socialism with Chinese characteristics?
@mrfancygoat4 ай бұрын
Seems a lot of Kaiserreich syndicalist players are here thinking they know everything about syndicalism.
@jirojhasuo2ndgrandcompany745Ай бұрын
when youve been bombarded by anti-left propaganda since you were born, there comes a time when you either choose to believe these soundbites or actually research about it yourself
@-zorkaz-54934 ай бұрын
Could do with some municipal socialism about now.
@MeZmerTized4 ай бұрын
After watching this video, some sort of blend of Eco, Municipal, & Yellow Socialism would probably explode in popularity amongst youth Right Now
@Tongzhi_BellaLabDog199515 күн бұрын
State Socialism ftw.
@460755 ай бұрын
at the minute 8:43 The text that Jesus Is showing is written in romanian. In Translation : I Am The Light Of The World. The One Who Follows Me Will Not Walk In The Dark And Will Have The Light Of Life. Learn From Me, Cause I Am Gentle. - Jesus Christ Amen My Brothers And Sisters.
@BrofessorStein5 ай бұрын
Sounds comforting.
@sniffer9413 сағат бұрын
Eeey Social Democrat showed up. :D Finally my country's political structure. :3 It's great! (Sweden btw)
@Der-bl8bv4 ай бұрын
We want ordosocialism
@jirojhasuo2ndgrandcompany745Ай бұрын
least insane rightoid tno player
@jonathannightfire87685 ай бұрын
How about National Socialism or types of nationalism for the next video
@BrofessorStein5 ай бұрын
Nationalism will be covered in a later video, fascism is planned soon.
@ivandinsmore62175 ай бұрын
National Socialism belongs in this video.
@vexintersect13125 ай бұрын
@@ivandinsmore6217 No. It doesn't. From, Social studies student teacher
@christophersnedeker5 ай бұрын
@@ivandinsmore6217 The nazis were more social democratic and class collaborationists then actual socialists.
@Wehrmacht_Greift_An4 ай бұрын
@@vexintersect1312self proclaimed social studies teacher I presume. Your pay must reflect your „knowledge“.
@ivorycxxxx14 күн бұрын
Truly a shame syndicalism saw decline. It really has potential.
@VaporMughal264 ай бұрын
Bro my flag is in your thumbnail. The Religious socialist one.
@BrofessorStein4 ай бұрын
Nice one!
@Loren_Arg_68164 ай бұрын
@@BrofessorStein My utopian socialist one is there too!
@beep18595 ай бұрын
Different forms of theocracies as a video?
@ReboyGTR16 күн бұрын
*Every sentence in this video should include "At least on paper"*
@MoskusMoskiferus16114 ай бұрын
Social-Nationalism ?
@Zzrik5 ай бұрын
I'm just waiting for that one person who is going to look at this video only to then go like:"That isn't true socalism." And then rant about how all theses branches of socialism are all wrong.
@BrofessorStein5 ай бұрын
I mean all the types are covered, there's nothing else. 🥸
@-zorkaz-54934 ай бұрын
I think that argument is more about differentiating theory and practice. Because the video focuses only on the ideological aspect, I don't really see what anybody would really oppose.
@Pepek944 ай бұрын
Where are Conservative Socialism and Social Conservatism?
@beardeodorant76823 ай бұрын
Those are forms of political syncretism
@maxb.chorney21024 ай бұрын
Why did you show a picture of Tony Blaire when mentioning Social Democracy at 3:08? Blaire was part of the Third Way neoliberal movement.
@marks71674 ай бұрын
Which led nowhere except Thatcherism soc.dem.leads to fascism hence the word social fascist
@lephinor24584 ай бұрын
Socialism, communism, call it what you like there's little difference in the two. -Marty Robbins
@IanLong034 ай бұрын
There’s a pretty major difference
@jayramos114214 ай бұрын
Socialism is the umbrella term communism is a school of thought within socialism
@lephinor24584 ай бұрын
@@IanLong03 In the end we all EQUALLY end up starving.
@IanLong034 ай бұрын
@@lephinor2458 The anarchists (socialists) in Ukraine successfully collectivized the farms in the short lived Ukraine Free Territory between the years of 1917 and 1921. The Bolsheviks, who were state-capitalists, decollectivized the farms (i.e. taking them away from the farmers) and gave ownership of them to the state. The anarchists were subsequently rounded up and killed. With the leader of their movement, Nestor Makhno, being exiled first to Romania, and later to France. The subsequent famine was a deliberate act of genocide by Joseph Stalin (state capitalist) as a means to genocide the Ukrainians. The struggle of Makhno and the Ukrainian anarchists is one of the greatest tragedies of all time. They created democratic councils of farmers and were largely successful economically, though counterfeiting of their currency did lead to inflation. Still, their short lived communes were functional examples of actually existing socialism, before the “Communist” Bolsheviks extinguished it.
@magnificent97844 ай бұрын
@@lephinor2458no you did not. Stop bullsheeting
@nathanlong82952 ай бұрын
I like gandhis vision but the ideal would reak havoc on land ownership.
@TiananmenSquareMassacre198912 күн бұрын
What does "one-party democracy" even mean?
@Joshua.R.8 сағат бұрын
It means there’s a democratic system but there is only one party Like Cuba they have election but you only run as a communist party member or unaffiliated
@nectanboАй бұрын
Amazing video! I would say that Nasser had more to do with Arab Socialism than the Baath party to be honest though
@imaXenoX4 ай бұрын
4:23 They are in power
@emillybech3837Ай бұрын
Many of the things you say about indiviual types are true for most of these ideologies
@marcusbaker8305 ай бұрын
You forgot about English Socialism, and you should have added the INGSOC flag to that
@Gawainer3 ай бұрын
Excellent and very informative. However while talking about Ghana and African unity you showed South America.
@BrofessorStein3 ай бұрын
@@Gawainer glad you liked it. Really? I'm so sorry that's a mistake...
@Gawainer3 ай бұрын
@@BrofessorStein You get an A+ anyway
@Supernimo7355 ай бұрын
Love the polcompballs on the thumbnail
@BrofessorStein5 ай бұрын
Thanks man
@goatboy1505 ай бұрын
Are they doubleplusgood? F&%king newspeak.
@Supernimo735Ай бұрын
@@goatboy150what lol
@topyson5 ай бұрын
well done again
@-AxisA-14 күн бұрын
4:25 Wait what?! Why did a right-wing party try to implement Gandhian socialism?😆
@syriannationalistchannel7918Ай бұрын
U are wrong on the arab socialism😂, the ssnp is against socialism, and is a social, not socialist, the founder of the so called"socialist party in syria" is antoon saadeh, who opposed baathism and it was the first party in the levant. Check ur sources buddy😂
@he_has_return_863 ай бұрын
No wonder i never see Soekarno as my hero, i see him as a commie bootlicker
@S.D.3234 ай бұрын
Wheres anarcho monarchism
@ugginator68766 күн бұрын
he forgot national socialism...
@BrofessorStein6 күн бұрын
Covered in the video about Fascism types. Check out the channel
@justzephan22674 ай бұрын
As socialist or communist I’d say a lotta his is just esoteric divisions of Leninist thought most of the time whilst portrayed as being anti-Leninist lol
@mrfancygoat4 ай бұрын
Suprised no anarchism is on here. Anarchism is a form of socialism
@BrofessorStein4 ай бұрын
We got a separate video on Anarchism, check it out: kzbin.info/www/bejne/eaGkZ5-mZbN8ha8
@BrofessorStein2 ай бұрын
@@mrfancygoat I got a separate video on all forms of anarchism. Check out the channel 👍
@Boris-18342 ай бұрын
Yea but I’m still theocratic
@Snaxolotl71Ай бұрын
BASED
@einmensch-nt9si5 ай бұрын
Actually state capitalism is ironically also a socialist model, it isn't here though
@BrofessorStein5 ай бұрын
Capitalism types will be covered in a future video.
@rimfire82174 ай бұрын
People like to refer to Marxist-Leninist-Maoism as “State Capitalism” but in my opinion that is inherently an oxymoron. Capitalism requires the means of production to be privately owned, the closest thing to a state capitalist system would either be Authoritarian Capitalism (see Singapore) or Corpocracy (see Outer Worlds). MLM countries may strongly resemble the corporate bureaucracy, but that is simply because both serve the same economic functions.
@moustachio054 ай бұрын
@@rimfire8217 its definitely not socialist tho since the workers don't control the means of production the state does
@BrofessorStein4 ай бұрын
@@rimfire8217 Will cover Capitalism forms in a future video.
@Tongzhi_BellaLabDog199515 күн бұрын
@moustachio05 the state is governed by the proletariat, though, so they do actually control the economy.
@_Mrrock3 ай бұрын
14 years old favourite ideology
@Snaxolotl71Ай бұрын
That would be fascism
@DMinus1020 күн бұрын
17 year old that lives in a suburb's favorite ideology
@acxharry12124 ай бұрын
Socialist patriotism?
@GuildsmanPirate4 ай бұрын
Guild socialism W
@RedBarkedTree4 ай бұрын
You forgot National Socialism
@BrofessorStein4 ай бұрын
@@RedBarkedTree check out our video on Fascism types
@ak-ev1mp4 ай бұрын
U see Indus valley civilization is 1st socialist civilization
@JohnnyAngel7775 ай бұрын
🌹🤝🌹
@liubei30585 ай бұрын
Fascinating... Not one of these is 'true socialism'
@BrofessorStein5 ай бұрын
What's missing?
@liubei30585 ай бұрын
@@BrofessorStein is joke how people keep saying 'Thats not the real thing.' so you put in the hard work to assemble all the different kinds you realistically could think of. So I was being a smartass.
@paulmcgillivray25355 ай бұрын
This could have been a lot shorter by saying millions of citizens deaths caused by "mismanagement".
@marks71674 ай бұрын
Capitalism is mismanagement to the extreme
@A.K2.71825 күн бұрын
Average capitalist bootlicker
@TiberionMarivallis16 күн бұрын
Capitalism causes still more deaths than the bad management of the state capitalist Sowjet Union. Mostly people got killed in socialism because of the CIA.
@ivandinsmore62175 ай бұрын
You omitted the most famous type of Socialism, which is National Socialism.
@Joshua.R.5 ай бұрын
Maybe because it wasn’t socialist? Notsees did not give workers the means of production in fact they privatized thing that were previously nationalized under the Weimar Republic Just because the dprk is called the Democratic people’s Republic of Korea doesn’t mean it is
@BrofessorStein5 ай бұрын
Will be covered soon in a separate video about fascism types.
@NSMexicano200819 күн бұрын
@@Joshua.R.The Notsees nationalized a lot
@Joshua.R.19 күн бұрын
@MexicanoIrredentista2008 name 5 industries
@wasmachichhier151419 күн бұрын
@MexicanoIrredentista2008 such as ? Outside of Junkers which was given Back to private hands No buisnesses got nationalized everything ended Up in private hands for more information read wages of destruction
@dardak8004 ай бұрын
How about national socialism?
@MakingAUsername4 ай бұрын
Do you unironically think that’s a form of socialism?
@BrofessorStein4 ай бұрын
That's a type of fascism, will be covered separately.
@gregornoskowicz63774 ай бұрын
Why not? @@MakingAUsername
@HaveButOneLife4 ай бұрын
@@MakingAUsernameWhether it's objectively true or not, Hitler referenced it as a fundamental aspect of his ideology, and it later shaped the ideologies of South American countries, namely the Peronists. Hitler and his cronies rejected capitalism, and instead opted for a third way, a nationalized corporate collective. His regime extorted profits to fund the JQ.
@MakingAUsername4 ай бұрын
@@gregornoskowicz6377 Because Naziism not only protected private property but expanded the power of industrialists.
@NickSkottex5 ай бұрын
8:45 the Bible supports also many traditionalist, nationalist, anti-racist, and many more values that end in "-ist" and either not align or even oppose socialism, so it doesn't really stand (imo)
@axdde64284 ай бұрын
National socialism?
@BrofessorStein4 ай бұрын
Check out our video on fascism types, covered it there: kzbin.info/www/bejne/gaabkHmVetKCq9k
@Satanlil-mg7ci5 ай бұрын
看不懂英语
@-zorkaz-54934 ай бұрын
That sucks.
@corvinmull24085 ай бұрын
Not seen in the video: a form of socialism that actually works :)
@goatboy1505 ай бұрын
I can sum it up in two words: No food.
@Joshua.R.5 ай бұрын
The average citizen in the ussr post ww2 had a higher caloric intake than the average us citizen the same is true for China today
@ΓΕΏΡΓΙΟΣ-ι8ν4 ай бұрын
I don't but ghandism and other non marxists ideas doesn't sound too bad
@Holy_Cup4 ай бұрын
@@Joshua.R.source? Except China almost the same inequality as USA(aka not socialist at all) and USSR starving millions of ppl before ww2.
@marks71674 ай бұрын
That is already around the capitalist world socialist society leads to more food like a primitive country like Russia then people were living in huts now of course it stinks of social democracy which goes nowhere
@Satanlil-mg7ci5 ай бұрын
什么意思
@BrofessorStein5 ай бұрын
Sorry my friend I don't speak Chinese.
@rimfire82174 ай бұрын
Talk about every variant of Fascism.
@BrofessorStein4 ай бұрын
Coming up soon
@BrofessorStein4 ай бұрын
@@British_monarchist will soon cover fascism in a separate video
@Meteor104 ай бұрын
@@British_monarchistfascism has private property lmao how is it socialism
@Zid_PaleoLiberta4 ай бұрын
Where National-socialism?
@BrofessorStein4 ай бұрын
Right this way: kzbin.info/www/bejne/gaabkHmVetKCq9k
@mingsocute4444 ай бұрын
lmao it's far right wing and not a part of socialism
@kittycatwithinternetaccess23563 ай бұрын
@@mingsocute444 says leftard media
@banan2683 ай бұрын
@@mingsocute444 on the political compass it's on authoritarian center so it combines both socialism and capitalism
@duovigintillongaming37793 ай бұрын
@@banan268no the racism pushes it to auth right not auth center even if it is "socialist"
@wanderingweirdo85395 ай бұрын
You made a 14 minute long video and completely forgot the most glaring example of socialism we know of. Which is referenced almost on a daily basis, who publicly avowed themselves as socialists, railed against capitalism and actually held the reins of government long enough to give us all an example that would last forever in infamy. Why is it you included a dozen forms of socialism, many which have never seen government powers, but forgot National Socialism, which in the 20th century gave us Nazi Germany
@BrofessorStein5 ай бұрын
Because I'm gonna cover it in an upcoming video that explains fascism.
@wanderingweirdo85395 ай бұрын
@@BrofessorStein Yes, but why is it not included, even as a footnote among it's brothers?
@BrofessorStein5 ай бұрын
@@wanderingweirdo8539 Because I don't want to have a lot of redundancy between my videos. I filed it under fascism.
@ooblagon68305 ай бұрын
national "socialism" is about as socialist as 1930s stalins soviet union
@---fx9re5 ай бұрын
@@ooblagon6830 That makes no sense. Stalin's USSR was socialist and a shining beacon of hope for the world proletariat. "National socialism" is just fascism
@kkvv36995 ай бұрын
There is another
@BrofessorStein5 ай бұрын
@@kkvv3699 which one
@Sumschmuck5 ай бұрын
@@BrofessorSteinNational socialism
@BrofessorStein5 ай бұрын
@@Sumschmuck Will be covered in the next video.
@thatguy54944 ай бұрын
Trump
@BrofessorStein4 ай бұрын
Huh? He a socialist now?🤣
@MercuryTheVexilliologyNerd4 ай бұрын
@@BrofessorSteinMAGA Communism, come'on man, can't you see how truly socialist that is? and totally isn't a rewording of National Socialism (Naziism) to appeal to the rising Leftist support of the youth in America
@RazvanEpure2 ай бұрын
No one knows the best solution
@TiberionMarivallis16 күн бұрын
But we know what solutions are better than capitalism.
@EPluribusUnumYT5 ай бұрын
0/10....no Socialism of the 21st Century
@BrofessorStein5 ай бұрын
What type is missing for you?
@EPluribusUnumYT5 ай бұрын
@@BrofessorSteinI just said it. "Socialism of the 21st Century" BTW its not actually 0/10 iss just a gag 😅
@skullo55574 ай бұрын
So ethical socialism is just liberalism
@kittycatwithinternetaccess23563 ай бұрын
you forgot national socialism
@BrofessorStein3 ай бұрын
Check out Part 1 of our video on Fascism, it's covered there
@Snaxolotl71Ай бұрын
National socialism is not socialism
@cptunidentified4 ай бұрын
You are missing one... the most infamous type
@BrofessorStein4 ай бұрын
Check my newest video on Fascism types
@S.D.3234 ай бұрын
Stalinism is the most infamous Hitler was not a socialist from what I've heard about him at least
@justchillin10874 ай бұрын
This are all buzzwords devoid of meaning
@BrofessorStein4 ай бұрын
How so? These are different subtypes of socialism
@Holy_Cup4 ай бұрын
@@BrofessorSteinthey are all just cover-ups for saying: "we are gonna take all ur stuff and stuff u earn and give it to government, which will give part of it back to you"
@IrelandAbu5 ай бұрын
Forgot facist socialism
@BrofessorStein5 ай бұрын
I'll cover fascism in a separate video soon. Stay tuned.
@MiserableMuon4 ай бұрын
Fascism is inherently third positionist, even when it may implement some socialistic or capitalistic policies.
@RedRed.9175 ай бұрын
even worse than the communist one lmao
@LSSD12925 ай бұрын
Why?
@BrofessorStein5 ай бұрын
What's missing for you?
@JohnnyAngel7775 ай бұрын
*_exactly_*
@Holy_Cup4 ай бұрын
List of stupidest ideologies ever.
@user585414 ай бұрын
Wrong
@Holy_Cup4 ай бұрын
@@user58541 right.
@roni41384 ай бұрын
Cope lol
@bartpepe36643 ай бұрын
No, there is no anarcho-capitalism.
@Holy_Cup3 ай бұрын
@@bartpepe3664 they don't justify actions of tyrants who killed millions at the very least
@wellingtonsh15 ай бұрын
Woke is essentially a form of socialism. It is commonly called in academia American Maoism.
@Joshua.R.5 ай бұрын
Woke has to do with being aware of social injustice that is not what socialism is the two overlap but are two completely different things
@-zorkaz-54934 ай бұрын
Haven't heard that one before. Then again "wokeness" is being used to mean whatever people want it to mean.
@DEFENDEROFGOD_5494 ай бұрын
Long live religious socialism as a muslim
@cowsagainstcapitalism34712 күн бұрын
It's not socialism if its not anarchism.
@livvi67Ай бұрын
You’re saying “democratic” a lot, but what you seem to mean by that is “liberal democratic” I.e. the established form of multi-party “democracy” under a capitalist system. The sorts of systems you are characterising as not being “democratic” are often *socialist democracies*. Instead of political parties being funded privately as part of what is essentially a market (see America most obviously), socialist democracies are focused on the people making collective decisions, often at a hyper-local level.