🖼️✨ EVERYDAY BEAUTY 🚩: FRAMING LIFE with Lee Friedlander 📸🔥

[@Joel_Ulises]

If you'd like, you can support my channel with a small donation. 😊 Every little contribution is warmly welcomed. 🙏 No matter how small, your donation will play a significant role in supporting me to continue creating and sharing meaningful content for all those who enjoy it. Thanks a bunch for your support! 🌟

[@cosmaracorosu]

Thank you!

[@Joel_Ulises]

You bet!

[@efrendv]

Wonderful artist. His son Erik, who appears in many of Lee's family portraits, is an amazing cellist. Not to be missed.

[@Joel_Ulises]

Thank you for sharing this valuable information!

[@RogerMunoz-ci7it]

I'm surprised that this talented and gifted man is not that well known. As I. was growing up as a teen I would subscribe to Popular Photography Magazine. This is where I was first introduced to so, many man and women who's photos I used to see in the magazines of my youth. Photos which I didn't know who had taken them. I was blown away by this photographers when I realized it was them who had taken that iconic photos. Lee Friedlander photos were a bit hard to find though. Perhaps because he wasn't out there so much as a commercial photographer as so many others. I first found out about his work in a magazine in the early 1990's called American Photographer. His work stood out and grabbed my undivided attention, I remember that very well. Great job Joe Ulises. I actually found out more about this great man here thanks to Joel. :>)

[@yeohi]

He's certainly well-known, at least within the street photography genre -- maybe one of the most highly regarded street photographers of all time. I always hope to find photos I like from him. I found a few in this video. But I really don't like most of them -- particularly the type of photos he's most known for -- overlapping reflections and where he appears in the reflections. I don't get it. The other stuff is okay/good/fine. But he shoots to please himself, not me. I respect that.

[@Joel_Ulises]

Hi Roger, thanks for sharing your experience of how you came to know about Lee Friedlander's work, cheers!

[@PierreBurnaugh]

Lee Friedlander's work is so varied. I always see a lot of influences or similarities in his earlier street work from Frank, Winogrand even Metzker among others. Enjoyed this video on another classic photographic artist.

[@Joel_Ulises]

Thanks for watching and sharing your thoughts!

[@joncaradies3155]

Another in a great series ! You are doing a great service to photography !!!!

[@Joel_Ulises]

Thank you so much for your kind words 😀

[@pederfuglpedersen9091]

I must admit that I have never heard of him so everything is new to me.

[@Joel_Ulises]

Thanks for watching!

[@michaelhall2709]

I’m already familiar with a number of those portraits of jazz greats, owning the albums that used them as covers or in liner notes. We and Friedlander definitely share the same taste in music. 😊 I’m a halfway decent landscape photographer, always working to get better. Occasionally I’m good or lucky enough to produce something that quite pleases me and others in my orbit. But I lack that capacity to take an utterly ordinary and mundane scene and capture it in a way that’s not necessarily formally beautiful and yet makes a viewer sit up and say, how cool, of course you would look at it like that! What a gift.

[@Joel_Ulises]

Hey Michael! Thanks for sharing your photography experience. By the way, I'm a big fan of Jazz too! I totally agree with you that capturing everyday moments requires a special talent. It might seem easy, but it's definitely not. Cheers!

[@outtathyme5679]

Amazing work

[@Joel_Ulises]

Thanks for watching!

[@garymc8956]

Just acquired “Arbus, Friedlander, Winogrand; New Documents, 1967”. Great work.

[@Joel_Ulises]

Cool, thanks!

[@elizabethsteele4633]

Interesting . His color work is much stronger than his black and white , in my opinion.

[@Joel_Ulises]

Hello Elizabeth, thank you for your comments!

[@smalltalk.productions9977]

thank you for the effort and sharing. not to be rude but two images are mislabelled. at 2:48 the image is not Detroit, 1963, Chrysler 300 because the car in the image is a 1964 Pontiac LeMans. the image at 2:56 is a Chrysler 300 and that might well be Detroit. no shade thrown your way. i am simply suggesting there might be a labelling mix-up. again, thank you for a wonderful YT channel. thumbs up.

[@Joel_Ulises]

Of course you are not rude, I appreciate the observations you have made about the photos, Cheers!