Abandoned Space Hardware: CANCELLED Part 1

  Рет қаралды 810,319

Everyday Astronaut

Everyday Astronaut

Күн бұрын

Part 2 here - • Abandoned Space Hardwa...
There’s nothing more exciting than a new rocket concept, a new mission to unknown worlds, or an exciting breakthrough technology. Unfortunately for every proposal there’s almost an equal amount of cancellations with only a small handful making it beyond the drawing board.
What’s even more frustrating is when these concepts leave paper, have thousands of engineering hours put in, hardware gets built, billions of dollars invested and THEN it gets put on the shelf.
In this new series called “cancelled”, we’re going to take a look at space programs and concepts that were so close to complete and sometimes even launched before it got cancelled.
All music is original! Check out my album "Maximum Aerodynamic Pressure" anywhere you listen to music (Spotify, iTunes, Google Play, Amazon, etc) or click here for easy links - everydayastrona...
I the cohost of an awesome podcast where we talk all about current technologies and how they shape our future! ourludicrousfut... or here on KZbin / @ourludicrousfuture
BRAND NEW WEB-STORE with Everyday Astronaut shirts, Grid Fin Not-A-Coasters, stickers, patches, prints, and more at - everydayastron...
Show your support by becoming a Patreon - / everydayastronaut
This video had two "Moon Walkers" who helped make this possible - Blake Jacobs and Mac Malkawi
Buying a Tesla? Already ordered a model 3? Consider using my link for a referral! ts.la/tim19804

Пікірлер: 1 400
@archiejmmiles6895
@archiejmmiles6895 4 жыл бұрын
Here in the U.K. everything built either breaks after the first use, or works so well that we cancel it out of fear it is possessed
@_starfiend
@_starfiend 3 жыл бұрын
Or the Americans force us to cancel it because it is better than there stuff.
@notcharged9179
@notcharged9179 3 жыл бұрын
Yes we have given up on space
@wishusknight3009
@wishusknight3009 3 жыл бұрын
The UK are very tenacious when they set their minds to something. It sucks they didn't pursue a space program, they would be leaders in it for sure.
@nukedukem6
@nukedukem6 3 жыл бұрын
@@_starfiend good joke
@benjaminbenbenben1702
@benjaminbenbenben1702 2 жыл бұрын
@@notcharged9179 that’s sad
@Mythricia1988
@Mythricia1988 6 жыл бұрын
The Buran story always makes me really sad. People dismiss the immense work required to not just design it and build it, but it also performed it's FIRST mission flawlessly. It was no less impressive than the US Shuttle. I am fortunate enough to own an intact, complete heat tile from the Buran, and I intend to create a display of it, with a nice Buran model next to it.
@Yutani_Crayven
@Yutani_Crayven 6 жыл бұрын
Energia and N1 were so close to being the best rockets ever built. It just goes to show you that politics trumps everything. It's especially sad considering that Americans and Russians were figuring different things out that could have been super complementary down the line, with more and prolonged competition. Instead, all of that Soviet expertise is more or less lost and untapped now and NASA is forever (forced into) recycling old Shuttle parts and getting nowhere either.
@bradallen1832
@bradallen1832 6 жыл бұрын
@@Yutani_Crayven I think the same thing, with the modulo that Russia was funding terrorism and evil around the world, which was the legitimate political concern. It shows that great technology work isn't always done in a way that can safely be preserved. (Due to the extensive cost of research and manufacturing that went into that vehicle, it would have been difficult to resurrect the project in such a way that it saved the successful research and manufacturing capability without letting the original investors benefit from its superiority (or benefit at all, for that matter).)
@DanielYusim
@DanielYusim 6 жыл бұрын
@@bradallen1832 is smoking the good stuff lmfao. "Funding terrorism and evil"? Sounds a lot more like the US now, than Russia at any point in its history.
@dymytryruban4324
@dymytryruban4324 6 жыл бұрын
@@Yutani_Crayven All of N1 launches ended in a failure. And if you didn't watch attentively, N1 had lower payload capability than Saturn-5 despite higher power and thrust.
@Rubashow
@Rubashow 6 жыл бұрын
Yeah but why use the Buran further? It was no cargo carrying system in and of itself, but a cargo of the Energija. It was build to have the possibility to launch and catch satellites and potentially launch bombs. After the Soviet Union collapsed it lost it's role. The Russians had a spacelab with the Mir space station and there was no demand for an ultra heavy lift rocket.
@andrewzhang7718
@andrewzhang7718 6 жыл бұрын
Excuse me? Rocket parts falling on populated areas? In Soviet Russia and Communist China, populated areas fall on rocket!
@starleighpersonal
@starleighpersonal 4 жыл бұрын
and people crush the rocket
@dunodisko2217
@dunodisko2217 4 жыл бұрын
Pokémon catch you
@small_SHOT
@small_SHOT 4 жыл бұрын
computer turn you on
@THICCSmoke_
@THICCSmoke_ 4 жыл бұрын
@CharlieRobloxKerbal *comrade
@supernova5434
@supernova5434 4 жыл бұрын
i will make you set SCE to AUX
@lnrd9088
@lnrd9088 6 жыл бұрын
I've seen the Buran twice. First when they brought it to the technical museum on an ship and then 2 years later in the museum and i have to say that its gorgeos. Its just giant and you can't believe, that there are even bigger things going to space, even while you read the facts.
@johndenison5245
@johndenison5245 6 жыл бұрын
I was Privileged to work on the Black Arrow project, designing part of the satellite ground support and digital comms equipment and installing it in a transportable container for Australia. The cancellation of the project after its successful launch still hurts.
@rattywoof5259
@rattywoof5259 4 жыл бұрын
Blame Tony Benn.
@teslar1
@teslar1 4 жыл бұрын
The USA “Negotiated” the cancellation
@gautamnatrajan1990
@gautamnatrajan1990 Жыл бұрын
@@rattywoof5259 Why, he wasn't the PM then.
@rattywoof5259
@rattywoof5259 Жыл бұрын
@@gautamnatrajan1990 He never was, but in his cabinet post at the time, he was responsible for the cancellation.
@RemedyTalon
@RemedyTalon 6 жыл бұрын
I absolutely love this style of video.
@EverydayAstronaut
@EverydayAstronaut 6 жыл бұрын
Good!!! There's a lot more coming :)
@elizogby
@elizogby 4 жыл бұрын
Everyday Astronaut Hi Tim! :)
@guest1059
@guest1059 4 жыл бұрын
@@elizogby Sup
@elizogby
@elizogby 4 жыл бұрын
Nigel 100 hi
@guest1059
@guest1059 4 жыл бұрын
@@elizogby HI
@VictorZenloth
@VictorZenloth 6 жыл бұрын
Hey Tim. Keep up the great work, Love from Nepal. People like you and Scott Manley are inspiring our next generation of space nerds many of whom will make giant leaps for mankind. Looking forward to part 2. PS also enjoying your evolution with you toning down the space suit shtick.
@davidgifford8112
@davidgifford8112 6 жыл бұрын
Black Arrow had a R&D budget of £2.5 million per year. That has to be a record in how little to spend to get an orbital vehicle operational. But who can resist the prospect of free space load deliveries.
@richardvernon317
@richardvernon317 6 жыл бұрын
@ Black Arrow was a flawed program from the start, the launch capability was limited and the only orbit you could fly out of Woomera was a polar one to the north. The Ministry of Aviation and Conservative Government basically ok'ed the project to keep Saunders Roe in the rocket business after the Black Knight programme had finished which had been a rocket used to develop warhead re-entry vehicles for the Blue Streak IRBM.
@richardvernon317
@richardvernon317 6 жыл бұрын
@That is today, there wasn't a market back then for it. Black Arrow was nearly canned in 1965 before it even flew and was put on ice for a couple of years before the first rocket flew. The upcoming commercial market for satellites in the late 1960's were ones that could operate in geo-sync orbit for telecommunications and weather monitoring. Tony Benn, the Minister of Technology had a big problem, a shortage of money and a shedload of projects that had direct practical befits to the whole UK and not the Space Sector. He had a choice, spend on the launchers or spend on the payloads. He saw a much bigger return on the later so Britain concentrated on the later (and did quite well at it). The US offer included building parts for US Shuttle related items, some of which actually flew. Blue Streak/Europa had the same issues, couldn't put more than a ton into LEO and totally useless for putting any decent sized Comsat into GEO.
@Karibanu
@Karibanu 6 жыл бұрын
The UK has about 5% of the entire space industry these days iirc, which isn't bad for an industry sector that's had no ( UK ) government support at all for most of it's existence. Losing the experience from building a launcher is pretty sad, but unfortunately that's the late 60s/early 70s - any scientist or engineer who wanted a decent career emigrated thanks to the state of the economy & investment at the time. The various governments of the late 50s & the 60s had done their best to strangle development in high-tech engineering areas already ( not helped by the US trying to strangle any competition post WW2 ). Naively despite growing up with some of my first memories being constant strikes, crippling inflation & worries about brain drain I still tried to go into engineering - extremely glad I made the jump into software instead.
@nicktrains2234
@nicktrains2234 5 жыл бұрын
Odysseus Rex both. The Tories sent the resources elsewhere. Labour support for trade unions destroyed Britain's competitiveness
@dave1the1deer1hunter
@dave1the1deer1hunter 5 жыл бұрын
@ similar happened to the TSR-2. The story goes all the parts, plans and tooling was destroyed on the signing of the contract for the US to supply the F-111 which I believe was delayed or even didn't happen in the end
@SRFriso94
@SRFriso94 6 жыл бұрын
Buran will always be a sad story, especially when paired with the Energia. It was just a much better version of the US Space Shuttle. And actually, the Russians looked into their own solid rocket boosters at first as well for the Buran, after all, NASA's plans were all public, but decided against it in no small part because they thought solid rocket motors were just too dangerous.
@adamp.3739
@adamp.3739 6 жыл бұрын
Never underrate the Russians. They know *exactly* how to make cars, and so rockets. I'll openly say, no matter how old the vehicles are from the Soviet era, all you need to do is upgrade to NASA's software, and what you have is a perfect launch vehicle. Even for one who lives in Britain, I consistently believe in Russian philosophies of making things. Make something reliable and rugged, with easy upgrades. This is why the Soyuz has been around for 60 years. And as a result of this, three cheers for the Russians!
@SRFriso94
@SRFriso94 6 жыл бұрын
@@adamp.3739 My favorite comment on that is an outtake from Top Gear on the Lada Riva: "Then there's the engine, which was designed to run on Russian petrol. This had an octane rating of 76, and that's not really petrol. That's spicy water."
@SxGaming3390
@SxGaming3390 6 жыл бұрын
yeah let's all applaud their amazing skill at reverse engineering, or if you want to use the real term, stealing other countries technology.
@jackherman1310
@jackherman1310 6 жыл бұрын
@@SxGaming3390 We did the exact same thing after WWII, taking German engineers like Wernher von Braun and having them build the rockets that eventually took us to the moon.
@marxistilluminati9529
@marxistilluminati9529 6 жыл бұрын
I do not agree with you. Buran was losing a lot of the RD-170 engines, the central tank and all four accelerators. While Shuttle lost only hydrogen tank. His boosters landed on parachutes, and his engines - RS-25, he brought back. Thus, the Shuttle had a greater degree of reusability than the Buran.
@neilfordan
@neilfordan 6 жыл бұрын
Buran really saddens me. Good video, Thanks Tim!
@christhescienceguy6285
@christhescienceguy6285 4 жыл бұрын
Actually people don’t know this, but the secret full flight tests prove the Buran was actually a huge success. The Russians built it, launched it, and landed it back on the Run way. A fully functional Buran WORKED. I have a picture of the Buran as it is landing on a runway as it came from orbit. Buran program was basically cancelled because the Russian engineering team did not see a future for Space shuttles after the Challenger Disasters. The realized Shuttle designs had secret fatal flaws. Hence program cancelled. But by all means, Buran was a success. Idk how people pronounce it but I say Ber-anne. And Ener-gee-a.
@Britishdumber
@Britishdumber 3 жыл бұрын
1:16 black arrow 3:51 buran 7:58 energia 11:13 Ares-1 17:00 ending
@Chris-jo1zr
@Chris-jo1zr 6 жыл бұрын
Curious Droid did a very good video on the black arrow. It was much more than just an "expensive" rocket. Then again he does very good videos in general, his one on the Energia and Buran are well worth watching also.
@deklusjesman
@deklusjesman 6 жыл бұрын
SLS is next
@thomaswijgerse723
@thomaswijgerse723 6 жыл бұрын
Hope so.
@Yutani_Crayven
@Yutani_Crayven 6 жыл бұрын
Shame that NASA is forced to re-use all of these old parts just to keep the jobs where they are, instead of getting free reign in starting from a blank slate and designing for a mission rather than for continuous use of existing parts. So many years, so many billions of $ wasted on political and economic corruption... when these engineers are capable of so much more. It's... such a waste.
@thomaswijgerse723
@thomaswijgerse723 6 жыл бұрын
@@Yutani_Crayven very well put, and thats the reason chances are it wont get cancelled. Its got a job and it is doing it very well. Its job is keeping contractors and congressmen happy by keeping them on payroll.
@hollowworld7137
@hollowworld7137 6 жыл бұрын
@@thomaswijgerse723 and Deklusjesman I believe NASA knows what they are doing. It really isn't made to be cheap. It is made for people to have jobs. and that's really important for many. They know about BFR (now Starship) and even say it may be better, but remember, NASA has had 60 years of experience. and SpaceX's starship can't be possible without NASA. Elon even says NASA is smart and because of NASA, they can make Starship
@get_emld
@get_emld 6 жыл бұрын
Nasa said that if the BFR is successful, the will cancel the SLS.
@euhenyo4443
@euhenyo4443 6 жыл бұрын
Rocket's 3rd Law of proposal: For every proposal there's an equal amount of cancellations
@Mosern1977
@Mosern1977 6 жыл бұрын
So that's the infamous rocket equation...
@kdvr766
@kdvr766 6 жыл бұрын
Lol
@44R0Ndin
@44R0Ndin 6 жыл бұрын
That's rather conservative in NASA's case, unfortunately. NASP, X-33 VentureStar, etc. All tried to be replacements for the Space Shuttle, but "but my jobs program" happened every time.
@walter2990
@walter2990 4 жыл бұрын
Perhaps it would've been better stated as: "For every proposal, there is an equal and opposite counter proposal (cancellation)!
@jchampagne5715
@jchampagne5715 4 жыл бұрын
44R0Ndin So true. They even hired the same guys who made the Orbiter to make the SLS
@NowanIlfideme
@NowanIlfideme 6 жыл бұрын
Yes. I've been waiting for this since you teased this! :D
@blackmarine1965
@blackmarine1965 6 жыл бұрын
As native speaker, i can say that your prononciation is right enough (enErgia, BurAn).
@timofeipozdeev828
@timofeipozdeev828 6 жыл бұрын
As a clarification, being a native speaker of both languages, it is /boo-RUN/ but the "oo" is short with stress on the second syllable. with Energia, it's more like /eh-NER-gee-yah/ again with stress on the second syllable and a hard G like in egg. Love the channel, you're making a lot of Tim's out there happy to share the name!
@Frahamen
@Frahamen 6 жыл бұрын
As a non-English native, pronouncing a u as yoo is something that only English does.
@timofeipozdeev828
@timofeipozdeev828 6 жыл бұрын
@@Frahamen Dont blame the language, blame the Vikings Romans, the French who have strongly influenced the development of the language through consecutive invasions. And now the internet, giving us new phrases like "nowadays" the English way to say it would be: at this time, or today...
@emhome924
@emhome924 6 жыл бұрын
Just translate "snow storm" and "energy" to russian using Google translate . There you can trigger the audio pronunciation.
@Frahamen
@Frahamen 6 жыл бұрын
@@timofeipozdeev828In general, yes, but the pronociation of u as yoo is not kzbin.info/www/bejne/i4DJipahaK9mm5I
@lawnlyrider4893
@lawnlyrider4893 6 жыл бұрын
You pronounced it allmost perfect, Tim! [bur'ʌn] [ən'ergija]
@jebise1126
@jebise1126 6 жыл бұрын
yes energija. i was 100% sure it was that. it hurt my ears whenever i hear curious droid talking about it.
@johnandrews1334
@johnandrews1334 6 жыл бұрын
Been looking forward to these forever, glad you finished it.
@Gnevnyj
@Gnevnyj 6 жыл бұрын
As a Russian space enthusiast, I want to say a big "Spasibo!" to you for such a wonderful review of both Buran and Energia programs. It is indeed a tragic loss for space flight in general that these vehicles never flew again. And it is twice sad that now they can't really be resurrected, now or in the future, as Russia do not have the necessary capabilities and technology anymore.
@greedycapitalist8590
@greedycapitalist8590 6 жыл бұрын
The irony with Black Arrow is that that the British government decided to invest in Concorde instead, thinking that it was a more commercial venture. The UK could have had an early share in the growing orbital launch market, and with a relatively modest development cost.
@thorstenkrell6038
@thorstenkrell6038 6 жыл бұрын
And the last "flying" Concorde sits on the roof of the "Technik Museum Sinsheim" witch is no so far from Sinsheim an partner of "Speyer".
@Patchuchan
@Patchuchan 6 жыл бұрын
The RD-170 has four chambers because they could not fully solve the problems with combustion instability on RD-270. If it was built the inline version of Energia with eight boosters known as Vulkan would have been the most powerful rocket in the world with a payload of 200 tons which even beats Ares V's proposed payload of 188 tons. It could have lifted the parts for a crewed mission to Mars in just two launches.
@mihan2d
@mihan2d 4 жыл бұрын
And also there were some planned features on Buran-Energia which are STILL being considered for implementation for future Russian rockets. Think about it, whole 30+ years later and it's still in some regards ahead of the time TODAY.
@nguyentrinhquanganh1494
@nguyentrinhquanganh1494 6 жыл бұрын
WOW TECHNOLOGY!! **[insert year here] later** This is lame, I’m gonna abandon it.
@connorgaming8351
@connorgaming8351 5 жыл бұрын
Oi
@galaxyfarfaraway502
@galaxyfarfaraway502 5 жыл бұрын
Thephantomoftheopera Connor what do you mean oi
@ansterling522
@ansterling522 5 жыл бұрын
0.00000000001 year later
@ranger-zi2oz
@ranger-zi2oz 4 жыл бұрын
After 9 tests 6 successfully completed 2026
@elite4702
@elite4702 3 жыл бұрын
Buran is honestly just amazing. The Shuttle was nowhere near how good the Buran was in my opinion. Amazing creation and one of the best spaceplanes.
@richierich2534
@richierich2534 Жыл бұрын
The buran never fired it's engines it did one glide test what are you talking about not to mention they stole a set of prints from the shuttle engineers
@owwsonewingwankersquadron5955
@owwsonewingwankersquadron5955 Жыл бұрын
​@@richierich2534acordig to the video he said it did 2 orbits and vend down how could de return without using the orbital manoeuver engine
@shroomie108
@shroomie108 6 жыл бұрын
4:24. I always find it amazing that the soviets/russians lift their rockets and in this case shuttle from horizontal to vertical on the launch pad.
@klen7642
@klen7642 5 жыл бұрын
The Energia rocket story, always makes me Cry.
@joshmellon390
@joshmellon390 4 жыл бұрын
I've heard "boo-rahn," and "Ener-gyah" the most often. I love how much you put into your videos man, awesome work.
@mysickfix
@mysickfix 6 жыл бұрын
Love your vids, man, just discovered the channel and have been binging hard! keep it up!
@radiotvhistory
@radiotvhistory 6 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this very informative video Tim! FYI, Buran is pronounced "Booráhn" in Russian, as the U in Russian is more like "oo" in English, and the emphasis is on the "a". Also Energia is simply pronounced "Enérgia" with the emphasis on the second "e" and the "g" is like the one in "Go". Keep those interesting videos coming!
@FacetsOfSerenity
@FacetsOfSerenity 6 жыл бұрын
Heh. "oo" like "moon"? Or "oo" like "book"? ;-)
@DarkRisico
@DarkRisico 6 жыл бұрын
"oo" like "book"
@charliewarhurst8464
@charliewarhurst8464 6 жыл бұрын
Aries is the only rocket I’ve ever seen launch in person, still was amazing to see at the time.
@scottpayne1086
@scottpayne1086 6 жыл бұрын
No joke, Tim, I was driving into work today and thought 'I really hope there's a new Everyday Astronaut video, I could really use one'. Wahooooo! Thanks for everything you do broheim! In a virtual world of garbage, pointless channels, you and yours stand as examples of what the internet could and should be all about. High quality, meaningful entertainment that enriches the mind. Your videos are more than view grabs, they're works of art! Mad respect!
@realzachfluke1
@realzachfluke1 6 жыл бұрын
Loved this video. The Buran/Energia combo should’ve flown more. No doubt about it. That thing could’ve been what the world desperately needed at the time. We’d be much farther along in our space developments and achievements if this thing became Russia’s workhorse rocket. I am very confident in that statement. And the Lipstick rocket was still pretty cool I think. I hope to go see it one day too. Along with the Buran glider in Germany.
@AtheistOrphan
@AtheistOrphan 6 жыл бұрын
Zachary Fluke - I live quite near where the lipstick rocket is on display. I’d be glad to show you around.
@Jone952
@Jone952 6 жыл бұрын
This channel's blasting into the stratosphere! I remember when a video was usually
@lewismassie
@lewismassie 6 жыл бұрын
I was astounded when I learned about the Black Arrow as a kid, and then even more so that it was cancelled. Post-war Britain was utterly broke, and despite the program being extremely cost effective it just caught the bullet the same way Apollo did. 3:20 I've seen it and it's still the only actual rocket hardware I've seen in person. I hope to change that one day
@Karibanu
@Karibanu 6 жыл бұрын
The UK didn't finish paying back WW2 loans from the US until 2006 I think. Meanwhile the US & UK rebuilt Germany & Japan. Funny how the world works sometimes.
@haraldhimmel5687
@haraldhimmel5687 4 жыл бұрын
​@@Karibanu The USA enforced the Marshall plan for Europe and the UK received the biggest share of it.
@Karibanu
@Karibanu 4 жыл бұрын
@@haraldhimmel5687 Yes, a large percentage of that was loans - and the UK had to arrange more loans on top ( and had to arrange things *during* the war too ), and fund post-war activity as a major member of NATO as well as it's own commitments. France was in a similar position but with rather less commitments. There was a definite lack of proper leadership both before and after the war ( a running theme with Britain anyway ) but 6 years of war with over a year of it more or less alone against two other nations pretty much wrecked what was at the time a a world power, and one that was needed to be a strong one post war. Was in the best interests of the US to make sure the British Empire didn't return to it's previous economic strength though, so prop it up & then make it pay over time. Odd to think given current relative strengths, that in the 1920s there was a serious risk of an Anglo-American war...
@KuyVonBraun
@KuyVonBraun 6 жыл бұрын
Speaking as a Brit this brings a tear to my eye 😓🇬🇧
@StangDGB
@StangDGB 6 жыл бұрын
Aries I is the most kerbal rocket I've seen lol. Well other than the Atlas V with all the SRB's strapped to it.
@juliuszkocinski7478
@juliuszkocinski7478 6 жыл бұрын
I think is far behind one true leader - Ariane 4 with boosters
@georgeghleung
@georgeghleung 6 жыл бұрын
Nah, the Jupiter III (Yet another Space Shuttle derived launch vehicle) concept takes the cake. So imagine 3 space shuttle tank, line them up like Delta IV Heavy, put the second stage engine beneath the middle tank, then put the first stage engine underneath the 2nd stage engine (feed off from the side tank), then put 4 SRB around the middle tank. Apparently can launch the Constellation MTV by itself, so...
@charlesreisner6681
@charlesreisner6681 6 жыл бұрын
No, the N1 is by far the most kerbal rocket ever designed
@juliuszkocinski7478
@juliuszkocinski7478 6 жыл бұрын
+Charlie Reisner I think only in ammount of engines. No cylindric fuselages, no boosters, no fins, transparent interstates :/
@charlesreisner6681
@charlesreisner6681 6 жыл бұрын
@@juliuszkocinski7478 but every time they tested it, it blew up. Also, their solution to having a payload that was too heavy, they added more boosters
@KonstaKokC
@KonstaKokC 6 жыл бұрын
These videos are super awesome. Best 19 minutes of the day
@rossh2386
@rossh2386 6 жыл бұрын
Energia was a beast to bad the Russians don't retool the design and have a super heavy lift capability in the modern era of spaceflight
@tomintheholee8901
@tomintheholee8901 4 жыл бұрын
Ares 1: Haha I'm going to be taking HUMANS!!! 8 years later... Falcon 9 Crew Dragon: Step Aside sister
@rocketmanfossel1174
@rocketmanfossel1174 3 жыл бұрын
Starship : **THE LOOK OF DOMINANCE**
@sadiqahmed4143
@sadiqahmed4143 3 жыл бұрын
Hail Star ship gonna make one in SFS
@MESHQuality
@MESHQuality 6 жыл бұрын
Great video! Some weird looking rockets :)
@NICKCIN
@NICKCIN 6 жыл бұрын
Yess, been waiting for this for a long time, thanks Tim!
@HylanderSB
@HylanderSB 6 жыл бұрын
Don't forget HRSDM, the Hubble Rescue, Servicing and Deorbit Module. They got as far as acquiring flight hardware from a previously cancelled program as well as a Dextre ground spare in order to accelerate development. It got cancelled after Return to Flight for the shuttle and the placing of SM-4 on the launch schedule. Much of that work led to the Satellite Servicing Projects Division which is launching its third experiment to ISS on the next CRS mission.
@EverydayAstronaut
@EverydayAstronaut 6 жыл бұрын
Now this I did not know about!!! I’m looking into it now!
@HylanderSB
@HylanderSB 6 жыл бұрын
Everyday Astronaut A lot of folks at SSPD are from Hubble pre-SM4 and should have the juicy details. I was just a worker bee on the periphery at the time.
@mimo5383
@mimo5383 6 жыл бұрын
On point as always Tim and really enjoying the professional grade quality of all your videos.
@Brom3z
@Brom3z 6 жыл бұрын
Man i would have loved for the Buran and Energia to have been continued. Apart from having cool names (according to wikipedia Buran means "Snowstorm".....That's badass), they were both such brilliant feats of engineering. Those pics of the destroyed and abandoned Burans really are sad.
@steveblomefield9513
@steveblomefield9513 4 жыл бұрын
You must be a happy man now after space x succeeded in sending peeps to the space station. Love your videos
@milosdewit7562
@milosdewit7562 6 жыл бұрын
Nice intro, the last one I most of the time skipped. But this one I watch with a smile 😀
@anton7591
@anton7591 5 жыл бұрын
You deserve more subs that you have right now! Love the work you are doing it :D
@sux2313
@sux2313 6 жыл бұрын
The Buran is amazing Greetings from Speyer;)
@AtomicFrontier
@AtomicFrontier 6 жыл бұрын
2:43 weird flex but ok But if you're interested in more Woomera Rocketry and finding out about the original Australian Space Agency, I did a video on it over at my channel!
@soberguy0
@soberguy0 6 жыл бұрын
I love your music, and your video's bro. As soon as you said your music was on spotify I immediately went there, Followed and saved everything my friend! I enjoy the content you put out there so keep up the great work. A while back I thought about doing something similar to what your doing now but I had no idea how to go about it. I have enjoyed "Everything Space related" since I was a little boy and I feel like I could offer a lot of insight to this world. What steps did you take in the beginning? Is there any helpful hints?
@CupidinColorado
@CupidinColorado 6 жыл бұрын
Your hard work and dedication put forth is greatly appreciated.
@piranha031091
@piranha031091 6 жыл бұрын
The ultimate troll would be if you announced, then cancelled the last video in the series! (I hope you will mention the russian MAKS spacecraft, and the incredible RD-701 tripropellant engine that was designed for it.)
@machelvet9594
@machelvet9594 6 жыл бұрын
11:52 Don't you hate it when old posts get recycled with new publishing dates. - I do! Just leave them with the old dates! At least a comment in the description would be appreciated.
@engr.nemuelobas4923
@engr.nemuelobas4923 6 жыл бұрын
At last. A new, long episode to watch 😍
@Funny9689
@Funny9689 6 жыл бұрын
I thought it was a scott manley video. lol. Very nice video, like the style
@BrotherCheng
@BrotherCheng 6 жыл бұрын
Kind of reminds me of Curious Droid as well, who makes a lot of "interesting that got canned" type videos.
@JR-lg7un
@JR-lg7un 5 жыл бұрын
This is the first time I heard why Ares5 was cancelled. Thanks for the details!
@moiplov
@moiplov 6 жыл бұрын
Tim, it sounds like this: Boo run - burán A nerghia - enérgia
@Dextrovix-42
@Dextrovix-42 6 жыл бұрын
That was very interesting, informative and in-depth. Looking forward to further content on this subject. Thx!
@fernandomota669
@fernandomota669 4 жыл бұрын
What's flying, is it a bird, is it a plane? oh, its a russian rocket stage
@runee7437
@runee7437 6 жыл бұрын
Great Idea Tim! Looking forward to the next episodes. :)
@SWRaptor1
@SWRaptor1 6 жыл бұрын
One can pray that SLS joins this list and we only see at most a single billion+ dollar launch from the boondoggle. Funny you brought up the massive cost of the Constellation program and didn't compare it to SLS. Which was supposed to cost $14-18 billion for overall development and less the $500 million per launch. Now it's ballooned to almost $27 billion spent on its development so far and though we haven't had an official update on cost per launch, estimates have it between $1-2 billion every single time the completely expendable launch vehicle flies. Can we get a video on this topic of should we cancel SLS and instead fund commercial super heavy lift vehicles instead? Time to seriously explore throwing SLS in the trash so it quits dominating the budget of NASA like the Shuttle used to do.
@michaelrubinstein4088
@michaelrubinstein4088 6 жыл бұрын
Add me to the list of “Drop SLS” advocates.
@Mosern1977
@Mosern1977 6 жыл бұрын
@@michaelrubinstein4088 - must kinda suck working on that, knowing that it is a waste.
@NamTony17
@NamTony17 6 жыл бұрын
Too much words.
@SWRaptor1
@SWRaptor1 6 жыл бұрын
@@Mosern1977 what's a waste? The billions upon billions we've wasted on repurposed Shuttle hardware with SLS?
@marxistilluminati9529
@marxistilluminati9529 6 жыл бұрын
NASA has already confirmed that in case of successful development of the BFR, they will give up the SLS. But the fact is that BFR is waiting for a long way that will be difficult. He is only at the beginning of development. For this reason, NASA is still developing SLS.
@rfiorini
@rfiorini 6 жыл бұрын
Great video. Always enjoy them. This one was Top 3 in my opinion.
@IbakonFerba
@IbakonFerba 6 жыл бұрын
The Buran is one of the most exciting pieces of space tech to me. I am just so fascinated by its story and I've also seen one of the Prototypes (the OK-GLI (BTS-002)) in person, it is on display quite close to where I live. I am also fascinated by the fact that to this date there are two orbiters rotting away in an abandoned Hangar somewhere in Russia Edit: 5:56, yep, that one :D
@PawneeStormChaser
@PawneeStormChaser 5 жыл бұрын
Dude I love your stuff. I’ll put on a playlist of your stuff while I play KSP(Kerbal Space Program). It adds a wonderful touch! You rock!
@tuskact4191
@tuskact4191 4 жыл бұрын
i like how the buran's mission was called "OK" even though it was not OK
@bennybooboobear3940
@bennybooboobear3940 3 жыл бұрын
@@Mick_92 it died. Hard.
@jaxonmattox9267
@jaxonmattox9267 6 жыл бұрын
Although I already know all this, it never gets boring hearing about rocket history with great videos and images as a complement.
@fabianhfs
@fabianhfs 6 жыл бұрын
The cursed video is finally out!!!! :p
@randomguy-jd8su
@randomguy-jd8su 4 жыл бұрын
*t h i c c y o s h i*
@GonkDroid0923
@GonkDroid0923 3 жыл бұрын
Lets be thankful that we don't live in the timeline where the Ares 1 goes to the iss instead of the Falcon 9.
@justjoejoe_0
@justjoejoe_0 4 жыл бұрын
Anyone else watching this after spacex's first launch to the iss
@jazzylev
@jazzylev 4 жыл бұрын
first *crewed launch but somewhat yes :)
@StarTrekerYT0
@StarTrekerYT0 4 жыл бұрын
Jazzy Lev makes me crazy when people say first launch
@spacedaway
@spacedaway 4 жыл бұрын
Nope. Watching after the Perseverance launch.
@masonmtb7
@masonmtb7 4 жыл бұрын
Dont you mean first *manned* launch
@lukeodriscoll5277
@lukeodriscoll5277 3 жыл бұрын
Can't help but think we might be seeing SLS on one of these lists some day
@cynbloxy
@cynbloxy 3 жыл бұрын
Nah
@elgoog-the-third
@elgoog-the-third 6 жыл бұрын
It's a pity they never continued Energija development, especially with the reusability ideas.
@deraffeaufyoutube
@deraffeaufyoutube 5 жыл бұрын
I was in the speyer museum once, it's great! Everyone near that location should definetly go there!
@NicoDsSBCs
@NicoDsSBCs 6 жыл бұрын
The Russian alfabet is very easy to learn. Once you know that you just need to read the Russian name. I've learned it in a day. You'd be happy to know that. Love your video's. Greetings.
@sharingfun1612
@sharingfun1612 5 ай бұрын
Cyrillic?
@TheEpicFace007
@TheEpicFace007 4 жыл бұрын
I really like your channel. It talk about rocket technology which is something which I am really interested in.
@mayankshrivastava3554
@mayankshrivastava3554 6 жыл бұрын
♥ Buran!!
@kevinmencer3782
@kevinmencer3782 5 жыл бұрын
I remember reading about one canceled project that would take the final stage fuel tank, orbit it, and eventually be converted into a small (Skylab size, anyway) space station complete with solar panels and a shuttle docking port.
@caav56
@caav56 5 жыл бұрын
It's called "wet workshop".
@mihailazar2487
@mihailazar2487 6 жыл бұрын
THE BLODDY X33 VENTURE STAR WQS SOOOO CLOSE TO FLYING , DAMMIT
@nathanlee6654
@nathanlee6654 4 жыл бұрын
Thank you for making these videos, they are amazing!
@spyro9979
@spyro9979 6 жыл бұрын
how does the Energia rocket carry payloads on his side without losing balance ? i know the shuttle does this with engines but the payloads don't have engines
@alex_inside
@alex_inside 6 жыл бұрын
Most likely the engines of it are angled.
6 жыл бұрын
All engines could be gimballed & were all capable of real time thrust adjustment to compensate for any load asymmetries.
@timbermicka
@timbermicka 6 жыл бұрын
Polyus did have several engines on it's sides, like some really small srb.
@timbermicka
@timbermicka 6 жыл бұрын
@ Ok i see
@FarSeeker8
@FarSeeker8 6 жыл бұрын
Are you going to do one on the Dynasoar and the competing companies designs?
@merxellus1456
@merxellus1456 6 жыл бұрын
I see u change the Intro.. Love the Falcon Heavy Launch.. Its a Magnificent Beast.
@bigginsd1
@bigginsd1 4 жыл бұрын
I remember seeing the Booster stage of the Black Arrow sitting outside the William Creek Hotel in Outback Australia, along with other rocket hardware that crashed into the dessert. I remember looking at it, and marvelling that this stuff cost millions of dollars to build, then some guy driving around his Cattle Station found it and slung in it the back of his Ute and drove it to the local pub.
@franzitheduck5914
@franzitheduck5914 5 жыл бұрын
Can you speak about the Hermes from EESA
@naprima69
@naprima69 4 жыл бұрын
There was actually a Energija II planned but unfortunately it never left the drawing board... It was a lot cooler because it was supposed to land it's four boosters AND the rocket itself autonomously using wings!
@anshulsingh8326
@anshulsingh8326 6 жыл бұрын
Hey can u make a video on ISRO. Their MOM mission and the upcoming mission to moon.
@josuecastillo5802
@josuecastillo5802 6 жыл бұрын
you finally got this video out. Congrats!
@jdgrimes7395
@jdgrimes7395 3 жыл бұрын
Who else is here because of comments from the 1/13/21 Livestream of SN9 Static Fire?
@rocketsometimeslaunches8902
@rocketsometimeslaunches8902 3 жыл бұрын
Can’t remember dates, what that the stream where he mentioned a part 3 of this hits 1 million views? I’ve only done 100 so far
@billmac7558
@billmac7558 6 жыл бұрын
Fascinating episode! Thanks for teaching my brain things! So sad to think of all those engineers and scientists who worked on the Buran for years.
@shubhamwable9509
@shubhamwable9509 6 жыл бұрын
Seperate episode on energia plz
@TarlanT
@TarlanT 6 жыл бұрын
Buran was a payload that delivered payload. It was extremely expensive and inefficient way to deliver things to orbit. But Energia was a beast, second only to Saturn V.
@wut5910
@wut5910 4 жыл бұрын
16:10 we have now...
@lextacy2008
@lextacy2008 6 жыл бұрын
2:46 LOL That's totally Kerbal right there with the glitchy gimbals. Must fix SAS !
@TP-tc7vp
@TP-tc7vp 6 жыл бұрын
Achieved, then abandoned
@LewisHamilton744
@LewisHamilton744 4 жыл бұрын
hey tim thanks for making me understand all about rockets and space i am a big fan of yours
@deepakfornever
@deepakfornever 6 жыл бұрын
Im glad india started its space agency early!!! Now we are almost self sufficient to launch all our satellites.... Now britons cry about aid given by them to Indian ngos like they r doing any favours to Indians!!! Post brexit im sure britons will be glad not to hv space agency!!! 😁
@greedycapitalist8590
@greedycapitalist8590 6 жыл бұрын
Don't worry about the UK, we have a space agency. The construction of a commercial space centre has also been approved on the north coast of Scotland. We're also, and will continue to be, members of the European Space Agency.
@deepakfornever
@deepakfornever 6 жыл бұрын
Greedy Capitalist dont spend money on space!!! Instead feed ur poor.. 😁😁😂 there are 14 million poor in uk according to UN.. peace 😂😂😂
@greedycapitalist8590
@greedycapitalist8590 6 жыл бұрын
@@deepakfornever I don't know which definition of poverty you're going off, but rest assured we're not starving to death here - obesity is more of a problem. In any case, if you want to help "the poor", the best way is to provide opportunities for business and employment - and the space industry is a good place to invest, being as it's one of the few industries that continued to grow through the Great Recession.
@fruitella196
@fruitella196 6 жыл бұрын
Deepak Kumar coming from India, really?
@mathias8987
@mathias8987 5 жыл бұрын
I went to the buran exibit in speyer, It is amazing to see that massive thing
@WhiteAndProudRuss
@WhiteAndProudRuss 6 жыл бұрын
Сердце кровью обливается когда такое смотришь
@TheNorthwestForager
@TheNorthwestForager 6 жыл бұрын
Really enjoyed this theme. I've always been interested the unrealized concepts of space hotels - would be a cool video to watch 🤓
@geothespade
@geothespade 6 жыл бұрын
Yesss! I can take you so much more seriously without that darn spacesuit on!!
@eddolous
@eddolous 6 жыл бұрын
That’s exactly what I was gonna say
@VincentVader
@VincentVader 6 жыл бұрын
Excellent video! Looking forward to future informative videos like this.
@KillaYT
@KillaYT 6 жыл бұрын
220th! I love your videos Tim!!!!
Abandoned Space Hardware: CANCELLED Part 2
20:32
Everyday Astronaut
Рет қаралды 696 М.
Why have SpaceX, Boeing & Blue Origin ditched abort towers?
19:28
Everyday Astronaut
Рет қаралды 2,5 МЛН
It’s all not real
00:15
V.A. show / Магика
Рет қаралды 20 МЛН
How Strong Is Tape?
00:24
Stokes Twins
Рет қаралды 96 МЛН
Will New Glenn be the KING of Heavy Lift Rockets?
24:13
Everyday Astronaut
Рет қаралды 2,1 МЛН
Buran-Energia : The Soviet Space Shuttle 2.0 on a Moon Rocket
13:15
Curious Droid
Рет қаралды 2,9 МЛН
Why won’t Starship have an abort system? Should it?!
48:44
Everyday Astronaut
Рет қаралды 2,8 МЛН
Why Don’t They Launch Rockets From Aircraft?
22:53
Everyday Astronaut
Рет қаралды 509 М.
Blue Origin VS Virgin Galactic // How do they compare?
28:44
Everyday Astronaut
Рет қаралды 760 М.
KSP: The Superior Soviet Moon Rocket! (ft. Everyday Astronaut)
18:08
Why Can't we Remake the Rocketdyne F1 Engine?
5:04
Curious Droid
Рет қаралды 3,9 МЛН
It’s all not real
00:15
V.A. show / Магика
Рет қаралды 20 МЛН