I want to appreciate all my subscribers from across the globe (Africa, Asia, Europe, the Middle East, The Americas, and The Pacific). Thank you all for your support. I am encouraged by your comments, questions, likes and critiques. They keep me focussed and poised to do better. I will continue to contribute my little quota such that every student and researcher will independently analyse his/her data. My teaching approach is very practical. I adopt a do-as-I-do style. Many thanks to those who have supported me by telling others. Once again, CrunchEconometrix loves to teach, support my Channel with your subscription, likes, feedbacks and sharing my videos with your cohorts. Please do not keep me to yourself (lol) inform your friends, students and academic networks about my Channel. Tell them CrunchEconometrix breaks down the econometric jargons and teaches with simplicity. Follow me on Facebook, Twitter and Reddit. Love you all, greatly!!!
@oluwaseunmuraina96374 жыл бұрын
Thank you for these videos. I am currently working on my dissertation, and they have been very helpful. I realise this does not apply with panel dataset. How do I remove serial correlation and heteroskedasticity from my panel models?
@CrunchEconometrix4 жыл бұрын
@@oluwaseunmuraina9637 Better to estimate your panel data with techniques that correct for those.
@oluwaseunmuraina96374 жыл бұрын
@@CrunchEconometrix Many thanks for your response. Which techniques are appropriate? Do you mean the Fixed/random effect models?
@CrunchEconometrix4 жыл бұрын
@@oluwaseunmuraina9637 Yes, use the robust option. GMM works well too.
@jemeka262 ай бұрын
Thank you so much for your teaching
@CrunchEconometrix2 ай бұрын
U're welcome 🙏
@omkumar4717 Жыл бұрын
your lectures are very helful, I sincerely appreciate you.
@CrunchEconometrix Жыл бұрын
Hi Om, thanks for the encouraging feedback. Deeply appreciated.
@Withf_PhDАй бұрын
Thank you for your contributions to econometrics. When I estimate the model with EKKY and look at the diagnostic tests, I encounter the autocorrelation problem. I tried autoregressive models to solve this. The problem persists. Will it help if I try it with GLS/GLM? In the final stage, I will perform diagnostic tests again. There is no heteroscedasticity problem in your application, but the coefficients are statistically insignificant. Why did you ignore the coefficients? I wanted to learn this. Thanks, Kind regards.
@CrunchEconometrixАй бұрын
Estimating models is not fool-proof. Some researchers put more weight on significant coefficients than getting good diagnostics and vice versa.
@adelekegbolagade3439 Жыл бұрын
This is great and I can relate with the explanation
@aminaahmedalibelal5676 Жыл бұрын
That's what i was looking for, i did the same for my panel data just changed into fixed effect model and choose the cross section weights. Should i have to test the Heteroskedasticity again? coz i did not find how.... i keep one receiving (Procedure unavailable for equations estimated with iterated weights) thanx in advanced.
@CrunchEconometrix Жыл бұрын
It should work with pooled data.
@maheshramachandran59223 жыл бұрын
👍 I suggest if you can run this exercise in Stata.. However to a beginner in facing with hetrosckedacity it's appreciable to get an good understanding how to deal with this. 🙏
@CrunchEconometrix3 жыл бұрын
Wow, Mahesh. Thanks😊
@BiancaYang-k7s Жыл бұрын
I wander does it has constant variance after weighted dependent data? could we consider its as classic linear model after weighted both denpendent data and independent data,?
@CrunchEconometrix Жыл бұрын
Hi Bianca, the "weight" corrects for heteroscedasticity.
@hzrkskn3996 Жыл бұрын
thanks a lot
@CrunchEconometrix Жыл бұрын
You are most welcome, Sir 😊
@leahchalamba34014 жыл бұрын
This is very helpful.
@CrunchEconometrix4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the positive feedback, Leah!!!
@User-12365 Жыл бұрын
Wow thank you I am thankful From Germany
@CrunchEconometrix Жыл бұрын
You are welcome!🥰
@TheLittleTurtle-tu1vy2 жыл бұрын
Did you use the panel data? or Cross section? I used a panel data, but I don't know how to solve heteroskedasticity. I tried transformation using inverse log and also natural log, yet It doesn't solve the heteroskedasticity problem.
@CrunchEconometrix2 жыл бұрын
Hi Muhd, I used cross-sectional data.
@waqasahmed2083 жыл бұрын
plz, exercise white test about panel data to deduct heteroskedasticity, by equation manually
@CrunchEconometrix3 жыл бұрын
Hi Waqas, if that is computed by the software why do same manually?
@bernadette27124 жыл бұрын
Thank you, this is so helpful!
@CrunchEconometrix4 жыл бұрын
Thanks Bernadette, for the encouraging words and feedback. Deeply appreciated! Please may I know from where (location) you are reaching me?
@bernadette27124 жыл бұрын
CrunchEconometrix I am doing a masters in econometrics and without your channel i wouldn’t have survived. it is the best. I follow you from Panama !!!
@bernadette27124 жыл бұрын
May I ask you to please explain the Engel Granger test ? I had a hard time finding an explanation for cointegration uning this test. Thank you again ! 💓
@CrunchEconometrix4 жыл бұрын
Sorry girl, I don't use E-G :) never used it.
@bellisma77 Жыл бұрын
Is it possible with Panel data? I am trying but I couldn’t
@CrunchEconometrix Жыл бұрын
It should work with pooled data.
@osamamostafa46114 жыл бұрын
can i estimate garch model or heteroscedasticity by GLS If i have one variable ( index of stocks ) and how??
@CrunchEconometrix4 жыл бұрын
Using GARCH or GLS will depend on your study objective(s).
@christinedanitha48713 жыл бұрын
Thank Youu ❣️
@CrunchEconometrix3 жыл бұрын
You’re welcome, Christine 😊!
@xinrushen74954 жыл бұрын
Thanks for your video. Can we plot residuals against a variable that does not enter into the regression model to judge the existence of heterodasticity?
@CrunchEconometrix4 жыл бұрын
Hi Xinru, I am not sure how that approach will test for heteroscedasticity.
@xinrushen74954 жыл бұрын
@@CrunchEconometrix Okay. Thanks for your clear reply!:):):)
@ibrahimniftiyev4 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much. I would like to ask a question: what does d.f. Adjustment do? What if we uncheck that option in OLS regression? Will our results still be valid? Thank you beforehand.
@CrunchEconometrix4 жыл бұрын
Hi Ibrahim, thanks for the encouraging feedback. Deeply appreciated! I have never really investigated that. Why not try it out and compare your results?
@asmafiaz65904 жыл бұрын
Maam can you help regarding estimations of markov switching model
@CrunchEconometrix4 жыл бұрын
Hi Asma, no idea at the moment. But I have noted your suggestion. I will find the time to learn it then create easy-to-understand videos.
@asmafiaz65904 жыл бұрын
@@CrunchEconometrix Thanks maam now I learn it maam thanks alot
@davidbunao27654 жыл бұрын
What if I only have a single regressor and it is already in the log form and there is still heteroskedasticity. How do i remove it?
@CrunchEconometrix4 жыл бұрын
Use the robust option.
@menedro39574 жыл бұрын
Thanks for your video. I resolved many problems about my panel. So thank you for your work. I have a question. Is there a video in which you show us GLS regression in STATA? I saw a video about gls regression in eviews but not in stata. Thank you for your time.
@CrunchEconometrix4 жыл бұрын
This video explains your query.
@ahmedtrabelsi35894 жыл бұрын
i tried all methods but always there is heteroskedasticity with p (0.000) normality too (0.000) correlation too (0.000) . Ps : i have 9 independent variables with 1300 observations for each one . pls help me what i have to do ??
@CrunchEconometrix4 жыл бұрын
Hi Ahmed, are you using cross-sectional data?
@ahmedtrabelsi35894 жыл бұрын
time series data : bitcoin ethereum gold oil ....
@CrunchEconometrix4 жыл бұрын
@@ahmedtrabelsi3589 I guess they are high-frequency variables. Besides, having 9 of such is too much. One or more could be driving heteroskedasticity.
@simonleroux65184 жыл бұрын
@@ahmedtrabelsi3589 I would just like to please know how you were able to solve this issue as I am experiencing similar?