Evolving the Brics with André Esteves, Lubna S. Olayan, Magda Wierzycka and more -

Future Investment Initiative 7th Edition
The rise of BRICS as a cohesive political entity is contributing to the redefinition of the global economic and political landscape, and now six more emerging nations have joined this influential group - including Saudi Arabia. The BRICS bloc’s GDP was worth $26 trillion dollars in 2022, according to the IMF. In a world where alliances are expanding and power dynamics are shifting, what does the future hold for BRICS and emerging nations, and how will these changes ripple through the global community, reshaping relationships, investments, and strategic interests?​
Moderator:
Eleni Giokos, Anchor & Correspondent, CNN
Speakers:
- André Esteves, Chairman & Senior Partner, BTG Pactual
- Dr. Eric Li, Chairman & Managing Partner, Chengwei Capital
- Lubna S. Olayan, Chair of the Executive Committee, Olayan Financing Company
- Dr. Anish Shah, CEO & Managing Director, Mahindra Group
- Magda Wierzycka, Co-Founder & CEO, Sygnia Ltd.

[@ngezas100]

Eric Li is always on point.

[@halimtalafuka9946]

❤❤ 0:49

[@halimtalafuka9946]

❤❤ 0:59

[@halimtalafuka9946]

❤❤ 1:12

[@geopoliticsfan]

Dr. Eric Li always speak with facts. One of my favorite Geopolitical analyst ❤

[@dodoreact]

This panelist was unequal, Eric Li miles ahead, and Lubna S. Olayan did well too

[@junbaosu8031]

the West is rich and developed today, not because of capitalism, not because of democracy and separation of rights, but because of centuries of colonization and the global order they made in favor of them.

[@stoneclod71]

I think global order might just be Zionist.

[@michaeleldridge5640]

you are wrong. they play the game of capitalism and have less corruption, and better rule of law. If others can do that they can catch up. but obviously it takes a century to make the change.

[@codzymajor]

China is doing that without colonization.

[@user-ho1ni1ij1m]

We need BRICS to balance the world power ok ,keep it up BRICS ❤😂😂🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉

[@pleongv1]

India seem like a snake in brics .. playing both sides

[@troutstalker4744]

Your observations may not be wrong .

[@bartonlee3594]

India is the future. China is contracting.

[@tristanx3508]

I though you were saying " India seems to like to snack on brick"...

[@michaeleldridge5640]

well the point is if this is just an economical collaboration, then there is nothing wrong playing both sides. free markets of Course. south africa and brazil also don't seem to want politics. china seems to be the one driving that point home. and they seem to try to steer the ship in that direction.

[@bartonlee3594]

Cannot trust rising India superpower for sure.

[@peterk5981]

Indian guy, typically, sitting on the fence, somehow puppy of the west waiting for handouts or investments which sink in local corruption, but on the other hand, trying to play the forceful role which cannot be launched due to internal divisions and cast society system

[@kevinfanhu2479]

Why these talks are always on rush

[@kalipotmeng]

Eric Li makes the most pointed comments.

[@GanacsadeCabdi-sf4cx]

Well.actually but u have to take the subject of morning really you can take that way it is great

[@halimtalafuka9946]

❤❤ 3:02

[@halimtalafuka9946]

❤❤ 2:52

[@kshen7485]

Politics is indeed the business. There is nowhere without politics. The capitalism is the true business, the socialism is also the true business. Only difference of both politics is which side they focus on, the rich or the most population.

[@bartonlee3594]

Happy that Eric Lee stopped being "venture capitalist" . He is now "venture socialist with Chinese characteristics.

[@niuliu6504]

He is just a capitalist who has sympathy for South Countries. China VS the US is not a competition between the capitalism-socialism ideology, but just two kinds of capitalism for real. China is more or less social-controlled and national capitalism. Both of their developments are driven by the entrepreneurship of ordinary people.

[@bartonlee3594]

@@niuliu6504 True. He understands now that growth in GDP is not the ultimate goal. It is much better to keep everything in order and to stop Chaos. See Xi Thought Book 2 for details.

[@halimtalafuka9946]

2:03

[@halimtalafuka9946]

❤❤ 2:31

[@bartonlee3594]

@@niuliu6504 True, lots of "sympathy" for "southern countries." India, for example, right?

[@halimtalafuka9946]

0:14

[@tanveerhamed4056]

Im No happen only brama is clud waited ❤❤❤❤❤

[@stoneclod71]

It seems most of the comments here are similar to what I think Brics is wrong in. Yes improving humanity, and our development would be the honey to attract more countries, not the bs of legislating global change. Learn about decentralisation, offer support for real growth, there's already too much money in this world and not enough health. Truth, freedom and health is the way to prosperity ❤

[@peterk5981]

O yes, freedom, the first word US army utters when attacking other countries

[@lifeinme3472]

Let's not talk about freedom, it is a word abused by Americans way too often on global south