Excel Techniques - 11 - ANOVA - Two Factor without Replication.avi

  Рет қаралды 111,511

FordhamStats

FordhamStats

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 25
@sgoldan
@sgoldan 14 жыл бұрын
Excellent explanation. The example, and your conclusion at the end really helped me understand. Thanks a lot!
@billygraham5589
@billygraham5589 Жыл бұрын
So what are we testing for? What is the null and what is the alternative? Does it make a difference that Rows were no a significant p value, but the Columns did have a significant p value? How does that work with the null and alternative hypothesis, whatever they are?
@phudo6760
@phudo6760 9 жыл бұрын
Thank you for your documents and videos. They're very cool. Thanks again.
@hieuphungminh6690
@hieuphungminh6690 4 жыл бұрын
Lol that tiny roast in the conclusion
@WisdomValleser
@WisdomValleser 9 жыл бұрын
What if those recruits were tested again in all 3 tests to see if they have improved (say for example after 2 weeks), giving you 3 pairs of before-and-after scores? What test should you use if they improved in any of those performances?
@WeakSideIndulgence
@WeakSideIndulgence 7 жыл бұрын
it's called a repeated measures anova (2 x 3) for before and after (2) and 3 tests per individual.
@CherryCakeLane
@CherryCakeLane 4 жыл бұрын
I did everything you said but it comes up with an error message "this input contains non numeric data". I did click labels, I did highlight as you did, not sure why it won't do it for me. Help?
@bchaitu
@bchaitu 2 жыл бұрын
When you select blank cells (samples with different number of data points), the non-numeric data error pops up.
@samkab677
@samkab677 7 жыл бұрын
Can we do a tukey test to compare between the subjects to see who is the best among them ?
@n19934
@n19934 8 жыл бұрын
hey how do you find SSE what is the formula?
@Dasaniyin
@Dasaniyin 8 жыл бұрын
Good explanation! I really appreciate the help!
@mohammedhishamshaikh
@mohammedhishamshaikh 8 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot! It helped me a lot!
@toasty3984
@toasty3984 Жыл бұрын
You saved my life 😂
@cojocariulaurian
@cojocariulaurian 11 жыл бұрын
It is a verry good video. Thank you. I kile the last explenation. They are better suited for Life Guards rather than Marines :))
@phudo6760
@phudo6760 9 жыл бұрын
Hi guys, I hope you can help me solve this problem. I want to verify the independence of two factor without replication, can i use '' ANOVA - Two Factor without replication'' ? and how? In this example, I can verify the independence of factor " Recruit " and "Score", its relationship to the result. Thanks a lot!
@WeakSideIndulgence
@WeakSideIndulgence 7 жыл бұрын
The design of this data file suggests this is a ONE-WAY ANOVA with 3 levels (tests 1-3). If each person takes each test, then test is a repeated ('replicated') factor. Differences between tests should not be tested as if it is a 'non-replicated' factor because it is theoretically not true and you lose power to detect differences when you treat them as if different groups of people were taking each test. Testing for differences between individuals is NOT sound practice, as each persone would have to be treated as a factor, or perhaps a factor of 'person' with six levels. This whole example is very botched in my opinion.
@Motorhomemarx
@Motorhomemarx 5 жыл бұрын
Truth. It's a poor demo that he should revise.
@samkab677
@samkab677 7 жыл бұрын
Hi what is error how is it computed ? Can we use tukey test for columns.?
@shaimabaitmaqbool772
@shaimabaitmaqbool772 4 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much
@disturbingbird
@disturbingbird 12 жыл бұрын
Thank you, much appreciated!
@drTWO7
@drTWO7 12 жыл бұрын
thank you so much!
@rebeccamulcahy8501
@rebeccamulcahy8501 7 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@robertpodolsky6252
@robertpodolsky6252 5 жыл бұрын
Your analysis is inappropriate for the data. This test assumes that all the values are equally independent of one another, but in fact you have scores for SQ, RQ and TQ that all come from the same individual and are related to one another. This is a repeated measure of a subject. You can see this is true by scrambling the order of, say, the TQ values--you will get the same statistical result from the two-way ANOVA, whereas if the test were appropriate for a repeated measure on a subject you would get a different statistical result. This error is on many videos on youtube. I see now that weakside made the same comment below.
@robertpodolsky6252
@robertpodolsky6252 5 жыл бұрын
Except that weakside advocated for one-way ANOVA, which is also inappropriate for the same reasons.
@kanwarbirsingh6725
@kanwarbirsingh6725 2 жыл бұрын
statistisignifcaldiffernce
Excel Techniques - 12 - ANOVA - Two Factor with Replication.avi
7:54
ANOVA - A Full Lecture to learn Analysis of Variance
56:49
DATAtab
Рет қаралды 23 М.
1% vs 100% #beatbox #tiktok
01:10
BeatboxJCOP
Рет қаралды 67 МЛН
Каха и дочка
00:28
К-Media
Рет қаралды 3,4 МЛН
Quilt Challenge, No Skills, Just Luck#Funnyfamily #Partygames #Funny
00:32
Family Games Media
Рет қаралды 55 МЛН
Two-Way ANOVA - Full Course
16:21
DATAtab
Рет қаралды 86 М.
One Way ANOVA
21:10
ArmstrongPSYC2190
Рет қаралды 1,8 МЛН
Excel - One-Way ANOVA      Analysis Toolpack
14:10
Jalayer Academy
Рет қаралды 725 М.
How To Perform A One-Way ANOVA Test In Excel
8:31
Steven Bradburn
Рет қаралды 814 М.
How to Interpret the Results of  A Two Way ANOVA (Factorial)
17:41
statisticsfun
Рет қаралды 337 М.
One-Way ANOVA [Analysis of Variance] simply explained
14:14
Using ANOVA output to make a graph
9:02
Amy Dykstra
Рет қаралды 184 М.
Two-Way ANOVA - all Equations - calculated by Hand
8:06
DATAtab
Рет қаралды 19 М.
1% vs 100% #beatbox #tiktok
01:10
BeatboxJCOP
Рет қаралды 67 МЛН