Executive MBA sample lecture - Private Equity by Professor Ludovic Phalippou

Professor Ludovic Phalippou, who teaches on the Oxford Executive MBA, offers a sample lecture on “Private Equity Vs the Rest of the Investment World: Can the Game be Tighter than Expected?
www.sbs.ox.ac.uk/programmes/d...
Subscribe to our channel ➤ / @oxfordsbs
Visit our website ➤ www.sbs.ox.ac.uk/?...
Follow us on social media:
LinkedIn: / oxfordsbs | / oxford-answers
Twitter: / oxfordsbs | / oxford_answers
Instagram: / oxfordsbs
Facebook: / oxfordsbs
#OxfordSBS #LifeAtSBS #OxfordAnswers

[@PrestonMcSwain]

This should be a must watch for anyone considering a Private Equity investment.

[@chrism959]

Thoroughly enjoying his book

[@doefde]

Shame they didn't show the two slides (good vs bad case with same IRR) the whole presentation was based on.

[@williamcaseywells604]

Speaking as a PE professional I’ll note that we always use IRR juxtaposed with an equity multiple. As a general rule, it might worth assuming that the entire industry isn’t run by a bunch of morons (who incidentally mostly went to top 10 MBA / business schools) who don’t understand how to accurately state returns.

[@gnrserbia]

You can see that the guy has never actually done it.

[@raysshine3504]

They way they teach doesn't seem very passionate compare this to HBS (Harvard Business School ) the teachers are highly passionate about the student learning progress, but watching a lecture by HBS and compare this to the Oxford Business school (Saïd Business School) I would prefer HBS .The case studies in my personal opinion at HBS are much efficient and talks on hundreds and hundreds of real life business problems and solutions through pros and cons (Which the student can figure out by using their problem solving skills), and they get real world skill .But I went to check on the Oxford Business school (Saïd Business School) case studies they aren't bad but the need to increase it so students can get a better experience of the real world rather than the classroom environment of theory work on top of more theory work (Thinking about engaging students in conversation is also very good rather than making them listen and take notes all the time notes aren't bad I am not saying it's bad ), and make it entertaining so students minds can cope for that 40-50 minute time period . I am just saying my personal opinion on the both school after through research, and anybody is welcome to say what they think . Sorry for my terrible grammar skills .