You don’t need to be an “expert” to question a concrete wall at the end of a runway
@robdog97918 күн бұрын
It was at the beginning of the runaway
@antbrown906618 күн бұрын
Correct
@reardelt18 күн бұрын
Well then you are just saying the South Korean aviation department is stupid
@antbrown906618 күн бұрын
@@reardelt a concrete impenetrable wall at the end of a runway is stupid. Yes. Stupid. Whoever ordered this yes…. It was stupid
@anthonytran756618 күн бұрын
@@sncy5303 If the runway is BIDERECTIONAL then the wall should NEVER been there !!!!!
@cosplayshop18 күн бұрын
As one commenter stated (Forgot where I saw it) That airport essentially handing out death sentence to anyone and everyone who overrun the runway with that concrete bream.
@eddiemglass18 күн бұрын
Did these 'experts' question the reason for a wall being there BEFORE the crash?
@maxamps4518 күн бұрын
experts agree with the people who give them money.
@WrexBF17 күн бұрын
Behind that wall there is a long and flat field. Everybody would've survived.
@jaybae585018 күн бұрын
I wonder who South Korea will hold responsible for this fiasco.
@jacksalami994518 күн бұрын
Kim Jong Un ?
@lordjim310918 күн бұрын
the birds
@joshsanford357617 күн бұрын
Chaebols. They run the whole country.
@mikeyankofsky800317 күн бұрын
It’s Trump’s fault of course 😂
@TheOrigamiPeople14 күн бұрын
Alfred Hitchcock‘S Birds.
@barabbasrosebud928218 күн бұрын
Concrete walls and aircraft are BFF.
@craig735018 күн бұрын
That wall looks like the ones you see at test ranges where they slam rocket sleds into them.
@TheBmco9918 күн бұрын
@@craig7350 must be some pretty good concrete didn’t look like it moved up much if any
@craig735018 күн бұрын
@@TheBmco99 Any concrete work I've done, it was always spec'd to counter a particular load. So what was this built for? To stop an airplane? It worked.
@GoodlifeInvestor18 күн бұрын
I Hope they don’t start rebuilding that wall before the next flight.
@RacingRob30118 күн бұрын
the landing gear possibly could have taken the brunt of the impact and the aircraft was likely higher than the brick wall with landing gear deployed. While it still could have been bad , I don't think it would have been as bad.
@lawrencedavidson619518 күн бұрын
737 landing gears are very short, having the gear down would have made no difference in the outcome.
@BigBisalreadytaken18 күн бұрын
Welcome to the land of "not quite right". The pilot didn't try to manually extend the landing gear or control surfaces? There are three hydraulic systems on that plane for the gear. The pilot rushed the landing.
@stevep771318 күн бұрын
You also dont have to be an expert to know that landing without the gear down is a huge problem
@mikelumbreras490318 күн бұрын
Concrete wall or not the speed that plane was traveling at this point wouldn't change much.
@stevep771318 күн бұрын
Nice to see someone with common sense. Everyone acting like the pilot belly landing it more than halfway down the runway at way over landing speed had nothing to do with this.
@visigoth369618 күн бұрын
It would save more lives? Isn’t that enough?
@visigoth369618 күн бұрын
@@sncy5303 exactly people act like with no landing gear it’s a death sentence, that barrier killed those people
@GeeGee1917 күн бұрын
Exactly because after the concrete wall there was a huge metal fence and the street. It should have landed in the water like Sullivan did in new York city a few years ago. Good pilots make good decisions in bad situations. Dumping the fuel and landing in the water was the right choice.
@henryhsu161418 күн бұрын
Do not focus on the wall
@ReneeBachtel18 күн бұрын
Exactly!....many airports have walls, localizers..nothing new..I believe it was a pilot's error possibly he demobilized the wrong engine during his intense & panic state..that's why the landing gear & flaps failed to deploy....Totally devastated😔
@Gus1966-c9o18 күн бұрын
Did you not listen to Sean ?
@nyxiebrizto18 күн бұрын
Yup it's concrete not a wall
@templar169418 күн бұрын
The bird strike or what ever they hit above and what ever the pilot had done wrong from landing the aircraft is survivable. The concrete mound/wall is certainly what cause the overall damage.
@GoodlifeInvestor18 күн бұрын
I’m sure there must be some other reason for that wall, I’ve heard that South Koreans aren’t dumb people, they are quite smart
@spegasus2518 күн бұрын
They are truly dumb people, cause by typhon the localizer each time become damage, so local authority in the island order to build it Permanent so not easy damage by tyhon, so disaster happened And Save budget ( excessive cutting budget )
@Pepe4687318 күн бұрын
What airport is built for an airplane to go off a runway at 150mph with no landing gear or flaps?
@GauntletKI18 күн бұрын
How many airports have concrete aircraft destroyers at the end of the runway. Is it actually standard?
@Garmonbozia18 күн бұрын
No.
@takezoaudio17 күн бұрын
that field looks to be below runway level and/or marshland, susceptible to flooding during heavy rain season
@mizziti18 күн бұрын
i question "landing" with no landing gear directly into a wall. what the f, couldn't the plane approach from the good side?
@reardelt18 күн бұрын
The pilots landed in the middle of the runway, which of course means there won't be enough runway left to slow down. So it's not just the barrier's fault
@antbrown906618 күн бұрын
Correct. Totally agree.
@kt307616 күн бұрын
Why are they focused on a bird strike when a cement wall caused the damage? who approve the concrete wall should be jailed.
@jayceecee865118 күн бұрын
Was that even an open runway? Was it closed off?
@z.k.668617 күн бұрын
Pilot’s error or not, the casualties would definitely have been different if there is no concrete barrier.
@DudeFrom197218 күн бұрын
I wonder why the terrain is so smooth at the end of the runway ! wouldn't it be better to have a surface which provide resistance against the fuselage like for example a long trench filled with pebble stone in order to slow it down ?
@christopherfidler301918 күн бұрын
I guess drones the size of SUV's floating above Military installations is old news?
@alanstevens129618 күн бұрын
It wasn't "at the end of the runway." The embankment is 250 meters or 800 feet from the end of the runway. That is a long way from the end of the runway. If the plane hadn't been going 150 mph on the ground 800 feet after the end of the runway all those people could have walked away from that plane. At that speed it would go another 800+ feet and almost certainly crash into something else along the way. Building, wall, storage tanks, embankment, ditch, waterway, highway, tractor-trailer, train, retaining wall, are some of the possibilities at airports.
@nancyk815317 күн бұрын
Bird strikes are survivable, losing one engine is survivable, landing on the belly of the plane is survivable, no landing gear is survivable, landing at high speed is survivable but ........ a Boeing plane hitting a concrete wall is fatal! Where is the safe zone at this airport????
@stephencoleclough798817 күн бұрын
So sad. Everything appears to be survivable but for a concrete wall
@brianlain416418 күн бұрын
The most important thing she said is it's not our country and we need to learn how to mind our own business. We can't even secure our own borders. Before you question another country fix your own first.
@ekeomagodswill29418 күн бұрын
Wall, Wall and Wall. Before it is pilot errors. Americans will never admit that Boeing had been building coffin called aeroplane.
@AdamG.GoNavy.FlyNavy18 күн бұрын
Instead of a concrete wall. Why don’t they use the same sand retention pits like they use on mountain highways for runaway trucks? Yeah it might damage the air craft. But it certainly will save more lives than a concrete wall.
@kcook424318 күн бұрын
Why don’t the engines have grills on them to keep the birds out?
@craytron139318 күн бұрын
All airports have some kind of perimeter fences don't they? The solution calls for EMAS deceleration material at the end of shorter runways. However, such material methods are designed for wheels down configuration, not belly landings. A lot airports have berms at the end of the runways including LAX.
@pohanahawaii18 күн бұрын
😔 Hindsight is 20/20.
@UFOpilot.18 күн бұрын
too much fire in this crash. must be all the liquor on the plane or they forgot to dump the fuel before landing. PEACE.
@rochelle226918 күн бұрын
Dump the fuel? Why would a plane dump fuel?
@lordjim310918 күн бұрын
Even if the pilots made 200 more mistakes than we know of right now and even if all onboard systems failed, including the toilet soap dispenser, the plane touched the ground undamaged and everybody on board was in good shape. Seconds later they were all killed by a bunker wall that should never be there. End of story.
@aaronaustrie18 күн бұрын
Maybe pilot error 🤷🏾♂️
@HopefulAmericaine18 күн бұрын
Most of S korean airports are not built like this, so to over generalize the entire country as incompetent based on one lousy built airport (like the freeways in nj) seems to go off topic. We can discuss the wall without unnecessary input
@1ndragunawan18 күн бұрын
According to the South Korean government, Yeosu and Pohang airports have similar structures. This Muan airport has the highest bird strike statistics compared to other regional airports in SK.
@jgrazzi18 күн бұрын
They’re not experts if they can’t discern between a concrete wall and a berm with ILS antennas mounted onto a concrete foundation. The concrete perimeter wall was behind the berm and the plane disintegrated before getting to the wall.
@TheOrigamiPeople14 күн бұрын
It looks like Angry Birds designed the run off wall.
@Starfish214518 күн бұрын
Right??? 😢
@kikiryki17 күн бұрын
Why aren't discussions still public between pilots and ATC? Why is it a secret? Would it come out somehow that the Korean pilots are discouraged by the airline they are working for to state coherently and completely the problems they face during the flight or what? Besides "we hit birds" what did the pilots tell ATC that it didn't work ?? Why is final approach transponder data not available from which we can deduce the progressive drop in landing speed ?? Where did they disappear to ??
@johnbravo754218 күн бұрын
I would like to know why runways dont have a gravel pit like western countries do for trucks going down steep declines that may lose their brakes or just lose control.
@markrigg662317 күн бұрын
I thought it was just Roger Waters setting up for a concert.
@reeva573518 күн бұрын
WHY question the wall when everybody knows how it ended. The REAL question is WHY the landing gear was non responsive on approach PLUS the engine incident during go-around!! No wheels, NO BRAKES. It was never going to end well, sadly.
@mangagoybislig62218 күн бұрын
NTSB always reactive ie “berm”. No “dolphins” huge container ship 🚢 struck the massive bridge & collapsed (main engine/jets casualties)
@mykedenie18 күн бұрын
20 decades lol.
@MinhCarpenter-r8f18 күн бұрын
❤❤❤😢😢😢😢😢
@ILoveCrepes60118 күн бұрын
I question why the plane finally hit the runway with maybe half of not less of the 9000 foot runway. Again unless they shut down the wrong engine and shut both down shutting down the hydraulics this is 100% pilot error to the fullest or improper training. Birds are taking to much blame. This happens in states and Canada frequently and no issue with emergency landings. Now we are to believe one engine down causes catastrophic failure GTFO 😂
@fabienmerteuil622618 күн бұрын
Their approach is the wrong way round. If they were approaching South to North instead of North to South there would be no reinforced wall, they would have ended up in the fence and water instead. Imagine if these pilots killed the wrong engine (and forgot the landing gear) “experts” are still going on about “the wall”😂
@ihn202318 күн бұрын
There should be no wall on either side, because in emergency situations there most likely not be enough time or capacity to turn the flight around :/
@amelghrici340818 күн бұрын
SOS Gaza save childrens
@GuardianOfGalaxyV217 күн бұрын
They were killed by faulty landing gear ⚙️
@EleventhMonkey18 күн бұрын
It didn't hit the concrete wall.
@Garmonbozia18 күн бұрын
Ehm say what...?
@EleventhMonkey18 күн бұрын
@Garmonbozia it didn't hit the perimeter wall. It was the concrete foundations for the landing system that tore the aircraft apart igniting the fuel. The wall wasn't the problem, and you'll find perimeter walls, mounds built for sound pollution, roads, sheer drops etc. at thousands of airports that fly commercial flights. This isn't the first time this has happened with regard to airport boundaries terrain, nor landing systems on the ground playing apart in the incident. To blame a wall is ridiculous. Airports are well regulated, as was this one. But yeah that damn wall right!? 😂
@ChristopherDolle18 күн бұрын
There’s a military base there maybe the concrete barrier is protecting something, get all the facts first before you go spouting off.
@crazyralph638618 күн бұрын
The concrete barrier was installed to save money from continuous damage on the localizer antenna from typhoons. Like everything else, trying to save a buck will cost more in the end.
@davegerke18 күн бұрын
Why is it OUR CONCERN? ITS NONE of our business...let other countries make their own mistakes
@groveh118 күн бұрын
Because my job may send me to South Korea for work - I may bring a family.
@pumpkinchucker495318 күн бұрын
The safety of international travel is everyone's business.
@kevingraham316118 күн бұрын
It's everyone's business, aviation is International and needs to be investigated
@jaybae585018 күн бұрын
What rock do you live under? Most of us travel internationally.
@paddybrady587418 күн бұрын
What a stupid thing to say you be one of the egg heads agreeing with the concrete wall idea
@BePositive198417 күн бұрын
It’s not one of the scariest videos I’ve seen online but it’s up there!☝️ 🤚🏻 🦵