Explosive Safety Testing for Bio-Fuel Storage

[@Nighthawkinlight]

If you missed my previous videos in this wood gas/bio-fuel series check them out here: Building a better gassifier: kzbin.info/www/bejne/foKsiGeai7uioac Building a gasometer for wood gas storage: kzbin.info/www/bejne/a5nJq6Gro7utgbs

[@theyappingvoyager]

NightHawkInLight, thank you for ❤ my comment !

[@Felenari]

NightHawkInLight so uh... Gas cannon? Golfball mortar would be fun.

[@SpeedDeamon95]

Make it run a model engine!!

[@Sethro2018Gaming]

how hard is it to be a one man cew i know i just want to know you thinking

[@garyowen3829]

NightHawkInLight can you Build a rocket with it

[@brandonfrancey5592]

Instead of placing your very expensive high speed camera right next to an explosion, place the camera behind some cover and film your subject using a mirror to see around the corner. Worst case is the mirror gets damaged, and you can always flip the video in post to put it back to normal.

[@BloodSprite-tan]

what about just using a simple zoom lens?

[@NM-wd7kx]

@@BloodSprite-tan mirrors are much cheaper than lenses.

[@BloodSprite-tan]

@@NM-wd7kx are you imply he doesn't already have one?

[@NM-wd7kx]

@@BloodSprite-tan he might well, but I'd have expected him to use it if he did.

[@GRBtutorials]

@@NM-wd7kx But then the camera should be close to the mirror as well then... unless it's a parabolic mirror, but it'd probably be cheaper to buy a zoom lens. What about some polycarbonate to protect the camera?

[@TheXxRenzxX]

The nice thing about your gasometer design is that even IF there was combustion in the chamber, the top of the gasometer would just come off to release the pressure from the explosion. It's like an isobaric system opposed to a isovolumetric system (ie. a propane tank) that would most likely explode more violently in the same situation. Still a dangerous situation nonetheless. This is a very interesting series of yours

[@JMMC1005]

You're right, but keep in mind that something like a propane tank is more than capable of withstanding the pressures produced by this sort of combustion. A propane/air deflagration in a constant volume container only produces something like 100 psi of pressure (can't recall the exact number, but it's about that much). I imagine wood gas is similar. When it gets dangerous is when you have a system with more energy dense gasses (like acetylene), or compressed fuel/air mixtures. Look up 'hybrid potato cannon' to see how much power you can get by doing this.

[@Helveteshit]

@@JMMC1005 You can simply place a pressure valve and it should be fixed. Since this set-up makes it fairly easy to calculate the amount of pressure a filled container has. If it surpasses that, the valve will open and release excess. Allowing the pressure to not build up. Albeit, it might result in a risk of not knowing impure gases got into the tank. A simple balloon on that pressure valve. You will recognize a infalted balloon as a warning sign that hte gas is starting to get contaminated by something.

[@whyisblue923taken]

Propane?! BWAAA!

[@petercoutu4726]

Could simply place a riser tube attached to the water reservoir and going up to the water level with a simple chain retaining the upper gas reservoir to keep it from flying apart, but leaving the riser open to the atmosphere allowing for the water to evacuate itself from the rapid increase in pressure without any relief mechanical valve.

[@constantinexi6893]

A bit obscure, but this just reminded me of the text with a title along the lines of "the art of distillation" by John French(?) that includes various stopper designs for a large glass flask, such as a plain glass stopper with a lead weight on it so that if pressure should build up too much, the cap would blow off, rather than the flask explode or crack, as it would be sealed and heated presumably over long durations.

[@piranha031091]

So, assuming your wood gas is pure CO, you need 1 O2 : 2 CO to be stoichiometric. Since air is 1/5th O2, and assuming the perfect gases law applies as well as neglecting the effect of water vapor, the ideal ratio should be 2.5 air : 1 CO. Or roughly 70/30. Which matches quite well with your experimental results!

[@akashmukherjee2405]

piranha031091 absolutely correct.... But you neglected the hydrogen content of the wood gas .....

[@piranha031091]

Akash Mukherjee : doesn't make a difference, O2 reacts in the exact same 1:2 ratio with H2.

[@mashedpotatoes5323]

Reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

[@wilfreddv]

Thanks science guy

[@deepcethree3705]

neglecting all the intentionally left out variables, that sounds about right. Although, i do kinda wanna see what it'd look like if we used the combined gas law and included the appx ratios for the other gases in wood gas.

[@thoriso1000]

Slow motion flame propagation is so satisfying. Love your videos

[@whuzzzup]

I demand a parrot-ending. Don't care about ads. Just give us the parrot!

[@cameronkeys49]

give us the parrot

[@joonasfi]

give us the parrot

[@unpaidintern7742]

give us the parrot

[@SapphFire]

give us the parrot

[@MrNeboff]

give us the parrot

[@Beyondthepress]

Fill up weather balloon with 75/25 mixture to make giant wood powered explosion :D I think that would make great slow motion clip

[@Nighthawkinlight]

That would certainly be impressive!

[@paulk3681]

You should do a collaboration

[@lengaming1651]

And her we go!!!

[@SuperBrainAK]

Yes please!

[@MrDoboz]

you want wood powered explosion? fill a high pressure tank with water, and throw it into a big fire, and walk away, because you don't want to be near to it when it explodes

[@zuthalsoraniz6764]

This footage also pretty neatly shows off some of the difference between a rich and a lean air-fuel mixture. In the 60-40 mixture explosion, the flame is quite bright yellow, which indicates there is unburnt carbon - there is just enough air for the wood gas to ignite, but not enough to burn all of it. On the other hand, in the 80-20 mixture, the flame is much paler and blue instead of yellow, which indicates that all of the wood gas does burn completely, due to enough air being available for it.

[@offgrid-j5c]

Are you a furnace guy? They are the only people I know that knows that! Cheers! btw,, i'm not one. lol

[@dylandepetro4187]

I think your wood gas series is perhaps the best series you’ve done on here. Wood gas has so much untapped potential, yet many people don’t seem to know about it.

[@simonrose751]

those combustile vapor high speed shots were amazing

[@qhack]

I'd be curious to see how you would compress the wood gas and store it in an old propane bottle.

[@LukePettit3dArtist]

What he said. I came here to say just that.

[@JonathonFrendo]

i agree with this. that would be awesome.

[@mfarmes]

Q-Hack! I believe Mr teslonian has done that on his channel

[@phalanx3803]

with that small setup the compressor from a fridge would work.

[@NerdlabsSci]

I'v been planning to do that

[@naominekomimi]

I really appreciate this. I feel like most creators I've seen would've responded to people saying that you should do something and complaining with hostility, or if it wasn't necessary then anger and acting smarter than them. But here instead of lashing out at people who range from concerned for your safety to overly critical, you treat it as a valid concern and then discover for yourself, with your viewers along for the ride, whether or not the concern is necessary to have. Rather than just telling them they don't know what they are talking about. I really appreciate that.

[@greenftechn]

I couldn't agree more. In the spirit of inquiry, no need to let one's ego get in the way.

[@christopherfreeman3260]

Are you making a complement by bagging on a hypothetical issue? How weird.

[@syntaxusdogmata3333]

The opening alone earns my Like! Never underestimate the appeal of your sillier experiments!

[@davethesatellite7319]

This was awesome! I loved the 80/20 slomo more than the 75 as the internal fireball was really quite pretty! Cant wait to see what's next!

[@DancingRain]

It's videos like this that are the real gems of KZbin. Bravissimo!

[@trulyinfamous]

Popping balloons of wood gas? How about trying to compress it and put the gas into a cylinder/tank.

[@BonesMcoy]

there is a man on youtube who is running his truck off of wood gas

[@allenstanley3418]

I believe wood gas when pressurized cannot return to a volatile state

[@BenjaminVestergaard]

Wouldn't that cost more energy than the woodgass provides? Of course, a steam engine could do the hard work, but the final question is whether it's worth it... adding a weight on top of the gasometer while in use would provide more gas pressure of course... Just thinking that building the pressure necessary for the gas to go liquid would be too much work.

[@augustovasconcellos7173]

@@BonesMcoy Did he make the system himself? Cars and trucks can be run on wood gas no problem, and so a lot of wood gas conversion kits were made in Europe during ww2. He could've been using one of those.

[@adorabasilwinterpock6035]

Thats not a good idea, could easily explode and you can’t store hydrogen for any length of time anyway. If it explodes Carbon monoxide will spread and likely kill anyone in the vicinity as well.

[@Pauls-Welt]

Nice to see that pure woodgas really don’t burn. A lesson learned in school shown in a practical experiment - nice! Greetings from Germany 🇩🇪

[@xenon5927]

I love woodgas!!!! Please continue the series a while. 👍

[@simonsmith2802]

What you should have done with your test tank you should have put string on the test tank and suspend it above you so when it flys up in the air the string won't let it slam to the floor and your test tank will always be intact every single time

[@akashmukherjee2405]

What a beautiful slow motion footage.... Brilliant demonstration of A-F ratio explosion..... Good job....

[@sdrawkcabdaernacuoy]

Great video! Now that you know the right mixture for good combustion, maybe you could create a simple engine that runs on wood gas.

[@utubeaccess7]

Thanks Knighthawk, i am moving soon to a wooded acreage and I plan to produce and store woodgas for fuel. This helps my research a lot.

[@zell9058]

I was downright queasy with that expensive high-speed camera getting soaked with water ! Excellent video👍

[@BBURN2007]

This is a very interesting series! I look forward to your videos every week!

[@JonnieMazda]

Another way to store the gasses is to have two 50 gallon drums on their side with one directly over the other. Have a pipe that goes from the bottom of one drum to the bottom of the second drum. Have a hole in the top of the upper drum as a vent and fill the bottom drum with water. Then on the top of the lower drum you have a inlet where you add your gas (your schrader valve might work) . As you add gas to the bottom drum and the pressure builds the water has nowhere to go but through the bottom pipe up into the empty top drum and because the bottom drum is sealed and only has one exit at the bottom it will just keep pushing the water up to the top drum. The water that is now in the top drum will want to drain back into the bottom drum but cant as the bottom drum is sealed. However if you ever completely fill the bottom drum with gas it will just vent out the vent top drum.

[@RobertSzasz]

JonnieMazda but if that does detonate/burn you're screwed. The sliding portion of the gasometer provides an easy pressure relief by moving up, the barrel would have to catastrophically fail to release the pressure.

[@josephbloggs6455]

Fun to see a video with less effort like this every so often. It feels more relaxed and makes for a nice change of pace.

[@MagisterMalleus]

The best part of this was seeing how much fun you were having.

[@kerhst]

Takes me back to my spud gun days. $0.99 cans of hairspray, at a ratio of about 15:85 was good for 150 yards. Good times. Love seeing you work with this unique fuel.

[@jimfenno8833]

Now that you know the magic "fuel:air" ratio, let's see a follow-up "fuel:oxygen" video! Then move on to some sort of wood gas fired spud gun, or better yet, a cannon! Keep up the great work! Sure wish I lived in your neighborhood...

[@HavokTheorem]

If it takes a 60:40 AFR to cause ignition and atmo is 20% oxygen, it's pretty simple arithmetic to guess that about 12% oxygen is required to ignite 88% woodgas. You can probably make it even richer than that since there isn't nitrogen diluting the combustion.

[@davidscott5903]

Thank you for showing how safe it can be.

[@cainofthejungle]

How come I see this 3 years later!?! Anyway, I love the candid-ness. And I actually laughed out loud from those explosions too. This is a great one.

[@TrollFaceTheMan]

7:20, very interesting the delayed reaction and what appeared to be smoke or fire that formed leading just up to it.

[@MrPeka13]

TrollFaceTheMan Hey, ma man! And interesting is why there is green fire after explosion 🤔

[@suckinDiesel44]

Rough guess, it required more activation energy before it could ignite, the smoke was likely the beginnings of the reaction which could only take place in the high energy of the plasma, but once it got going the rest was able to ignite.

[@zoeyk.6338]

I'd say it's just the insulation on the wires of the igniter burning off

[@PKMartin]

If you want to go full 19ty century with your gas, I'd love to see this in a small jet power a limelight - you can use a modern butane lamp mantle or make your own with quicklime and cloth

[@texasvoice2082]

These videos are proof that *anything* can get dislikes on KZbin. I watched all these wood gas videos straight through all at once. Good stuff.

[@dr.feelgood2358]

thanks for tackling the safety issue. I think far too many people are ignorant of the dangers of flammable liquids and gases...especially gases, because they are usually invisible and sometimes odorless. you don't know there is a problem until it's too late and it happens very fast, so no time to react. highly recommend if you are not an expert you take all available and precautions. work in well ventilated areas where fuel vapors can't build up, and there are no sparks or open flames. some appliances such as refrigerators produce sparks, so be aware of that.

[@littleship2473]

Its funny how you are blowing stuff up to see how safe it is. Enjoyed it very much

[@mjernix7656]

Why are all of your videos so satisfying to watch?

[@Acrophobia2]

Try to run a small engine or lawn tool with it!

[@JuanGomez-mv1qx]

Parker K yeah that be cool

[@Rocco-du2zt]

In the End of WW2, Germany experimented with Wood gas Powered Trucks/tanks

[@thetruthexperiment]

people think everyone is stupid and somehow a comment is going to save your life and you're going to be so grateful. When in fact, everyone thinks they suck. Probably even their closest friends find them disappointing.

[@jordanhorst6]

Video idea: bio fuel cannon!

[@justinsickles4229]

Night, what are your plans for a long term storage? I do understand that the water in the current storage device is used for filtration. So after you believe the wood gas has been purified enough, do you plan to find a way to compress it and store it in some type of tank? My thought process is an efficient storage tank to use as the fuel for an engine of some sort. Keep up the amazing work!

[@elyeli6250]

I was thinking on modifying a bicycle pump (or building a pump) so that it can intake purified wood gas to be pumped into either a metal air tank (those small metal tanks for holding air for air tools) or making a woodgas tank out of ABS or PVC (whichever generates less static) so one can be used for powering a small engine.

[@syninys100]

Wood gas is, among other factors, CO and H2. Compressing it will promote production of methanol. Now, there's still a kinetic barrier (that's why to do it deliberately one uses a catalyst and heat as well), but that's a thing to bear in mind if compressing it. That said, methanol is a useful fuel, with higher energy density than a gas - if it wasn't toxic it'd be an almost ideal fuel for many purposes! In practice, most wood gas is a bit deficient in hydrogen to be optimal, however. Still, if one wanted to go to extremes, then making 'water gas' with the left over charcoal is how to get more out of the fuel.

[@greenftechn]

@@syninys100 It would be interesting to set up a contest to see who could extract the most fuel from a given weight of wood stock.

[@joebedell37]

Love the series. I have a coworker who wants to do this and was really excited when I told him about your channel. Keep up the good work!

[@MarcMethotisAwesome]

The way I see it; one of the reasons the 80% air mix was less powerful, is that the hole in the container caused the explosion to be less restrained. It met the open air a lot sooner. Fun video as always!

[@edcofu]

Can you cool the wood gas into a liquid and store it in a pressurized container, and how much gas in liquid form would a given quantity of wood produce? Great series!

[@PKMartin]

Eduardo Fuentes I don't think wood gas liquifies well but it's very dangerous when pressurised, I think the carbon monoxide makes it a shock sensitive explosive so it's a very bad idea to try pressurising

[@theterribleanimator1793]

* very good.

[@amejaremy]

I absolutely love watching your videos with my son. Just a sincere suggestion (from a guy with muscular dystrophy) whenever you are sitting around reading or studying, use a dumbbell to build up your upper body muscles. You'll thank yourself in the future. For anyone wanting to bash me for this comment...go ahead but I won't be reading it. ....and pickup a dumbbell too! ;)

[@TheBobcat418]

I love how you can see a hint of green flame in the 60/40 mix, was the copper aerosolized when the wires arced or was there another source? Great video! I am loving the biogas series.

[@owenwhitman6616]

Good information. Thanks for doing the leg work and giving us a solid starting point.

[@willtelscher1881]

I remember watching you a few years ago. I just re-subscribed as I don’t use my old account anymore. You were one of my inspirations for making fireworks! Great vids!!

[@FloydtheFlamingo]

i don’t comment much. but i’ve been a long term subscriber. love each one of your videos. you never let me down. amazing work always.

[@mikereynolds8804]

This is so cool, and a real eye opener. I figured the amount of air necessary for ignition would be a lot less. Useful! I Subscribed!

[@andrewlalis]

Very excited to see what you end up using the wood gas for.

[@davidrobinson7112]

Excellent instruction....the mistakes add to the knowledge base. 👏 Thank you very much

[@Moock91]

Pretty fun stuff indeed! Your explanations are always so clear and concise, sweet!

[@lyndsaybeck2249]

Really enjoy your indepth exploration and explaination. Any chance you could tackle a vegetable based biogas project?

[@rockytom5889]

Lyndsay Beck He would need to modify his current gas maker to be more of a low temp boiler because methane(not pure,of course)is a byproduct of rotting plant matter(composting),which is sped up by moderate heat and high air humidity in the chamber.And that's pretty much it.

[@RobertSzasz]

A 1 or 2 liter bottle with a snorkel (reverse siphon?) to add air and wood gas would be ideal for this, cheap, easy to film through, and strong

[@BlackWolf42-]

I've watched you since you made your debut here. You showed me how to make multi-break shells and how to properly spike them. You likely didn't have any grey hairs and your hands were soft and your joints ungrizzled. You've come a long way on youtube and in your personal life* (unverifiable). I sort of feel like a proud parent watching his kid grow up. Keep up the awesome work, tough guy.

[@Nighthawkinlight]

Ha, no, I had gray hair back then too

[@Scrogan]

I imagine you’re planning quite a few wood-gas projects, but it would also be interesting to see if you can use coal instead of wood in your gasifier. The left-overs might be akin to coal-coke and be usable as a clean charcoal-like fuel for smelting. Apart from that would be the usual Bunsen-burner, gas-stove, hot water heater, perhaps a primitive engine of some sort. Great video!

[@reaganharder1480]

I'm not sure, but I'm pretty sure wood-gas only really works because of other chemicals other than just carbon in the wood, whereas coal is almost entirely carbon, so it's more like the charcoal you're left with after making the wood gas. Basically the coal is the by-product of a natural wood-gasification process, just under very high pressure. that's what i've been told anyway. still worth trying though i think.

[@sethb5433]

I know it’s been 4 years so you might have found the answer, but there are actually charcoal gasifiers. Wood gas is updraft iirc, where charcoal is down. So little different, and the need for filtering is much less.

[@Tonio020589]

Congrats, you just figured the upper explosive level of wood gas. The best explosion you'd get, if you had something like a little mixer, bc not only the ratio, but also the mixture of the two components air and woodgas is quite important. I really liked this 👍

[@bardrick4220]

I'm not sure there's any CO in this mix since you're just evaporating the volatile components in the wood. You'd have to combust the charcoal with oxygen to get CO. On a side note: I have considered tapping living pine trees for their turpentine. Pure turpentine is also available for not much more than gasoline!

[@ba2hln14]

Don’t forget to turn on the high speed camera

[@Nighthawkinlight]

Thanks!

[@kevinbowker2385]

That looked like a lot of fun! Good info too, thanks for holding the experiment and sharing the results!

[@erikwalfridsson8790]

Nice, but you really should have found out upper limit for the Air to wood gas ratio too. That would show the danger of expolsion if the wood gas is leaking out ..but then on the other hand if it would leak that much, I guess that everybody in danger of being blown up would already be dead from CO-poisoning anyway so maybe thath limit doesn´t matter.

[@erikwalfridsson8790]

I see now that the lowest reported lethal doses for a humans is 30 minutes in 4000 part per million and 5 minutes in 5000 ppm. A very scary gas. The explosive limits according to wikipedia is 12.5-74.2% so I guess you got the results you did due to uneven mixture. (Please excuse my bad english)

[@DanielSMatthews]

You also have to be careful with the CO dissolving into your water then back out at the joins, basically it can diffuse out of the device slowly and the water is not a barrier. If the device is in an enclosed area then there could be a buildup of CO on the outside of it, just waiting for the ratio to be right and a spark from static electricity to ignite it, like from you opening a cupboard etc. to remove the gasometer to play with it some more.

[@stevejohn]

really enjoy your videos thanks. i made the pop gun with my nephew last year and he still talks about it was a great time

[@speedbuggy16v]

OK, subscribed, anyone that has as much rube goldberg engineering in their videos deserves that much!

[@hilltop4847]

I'm loving this series!!

[@MrDarkTynan]

Biogass is quite safe. Aslong as your storage is not in an enclosed space. The likely hood of you reaching your LEL lower explosive limit is quite low even in the event of a leak. Indoors is a completely different story. Like your experiment that enclosed space can quickly build up gass levels to you LEL. FYI this is why people who work in enclosed spaces,with limited ventilation, space or access, should have enclosed space entry training.

[@timhooper1557]

i should say you worked in the gas industry, i totally agree with you! usually around 5% gas in air. side note, when i first started working in the gas industry, you would see the old boys in the pits cutting off a 3\4" gas service with a hack saw and a lit rolly in their mouths! at least they would insist on continuity bonds!! as that was more of a risk of causing a fire!!! would get thrown off the job for that nowadays!!! lol

[@EeroafHeurlin]

Not to mention the CO toxicity if leaked anywhere where people would be. Carbon Monoxide is crazy toxic and will not trigger the "can't breathe" reflex/feeling like CO2 does, you will simply pass out and die without realizing anything is wrong if you inhale CO.

[@EeroafHeurlin]

Here in Finland, the promised land of wood-fired stoves (especially in Saunas), we have quite the public awareness campaigns on the dangers of carbon monoxide and carbon monoxide alarms are available in every supermarket (and most gas stations)

[@tenlittleindians]

Eero af Heurlin. I'm remembering when most refrigeration equipment was ammonia based. These were big systems such as those used in dairies. An ammonia leak could quickly flood a building and getting to a door to escape proved to be a challenge if you got more than one strong breath of the concentrated gas. That's one of the reasons ammonia systems are no longer common here in the United States.

[@tenlittleindians]

Tynan Larson-Caldwell. This system of storage within a water filled container is older than any of us here I'd bet. There's still a tank or two back east that are bigger than most above ground water towers and the were used for heavy gas storage. Acetylene gas was stored like this at some point in time. I've got an old ceiling mounted gas light that ran on carbide gas. The gas generators were mounted in buildings and gas lines were strung out through the walls much like electrical wires are distributed from a breaker box. You started your carbide generator in the back of a church for example and then walked down the aisles lighting the individual lamps. It's easy to see that a light blowing out or a valve turned on by mistake could pose a calamity. Probably made it easier for Edison to sell his new form of mass lighting. I'm sure he promoted it as being safer.

[@runetitan-lx4ih]

That's a really clever, quick and easy way of removing gas from a container

[@aronbraswell1589]

still need to make an ethanol trap. Wondering how much ethanol you get per volume of wood gas?

[@Cramduck]

Aw man. I'm so excited about this. I am hoping to get a solar-focused wood-gas processor up and rolling someday. you've got all the tricks I need

[@docretier2544]

I just wanted to say how much I love the work you do. It always makes me feel so happy when I see a new video from you. Please keep up the amazing work.

[@drewbransby4600]

That high speed is gorgeous

[@Bizzybugproductions]

Oh yeah, we all totally just have a stun gun. Nice job shopping at Supreme for supplies 👌 , makes these projects super accessible....

[@Xerxz5115]

It's very entertaining to watch you do these experiments. And you probably have the best video quality on youtube!

[@boocchihitori4450]

I really enjoy your works... Thanks for uploading these..

[@TURTLEMMC23]

I think a more simple way of testing it would be to open a valve and light the gas like you did in your B roll. And when your gas runs out the air will pull in. Then the tank may explode. But if you always have it charged, it should never allow oxy up the line. So dont forget and leave an experiment un attended. But this whole vid of finding the LEL is IMO not answering the safety question. Put a flame arrestor for safety. Because it may not always be you, in and around that equipment.

[@sfurules]

SOOOOOOOOOO......after the explosion in Beirut KZbin decided THIS is the video I needed to see....

[@garywaggoner1953]

there is just something so oddly satisfying watching stuff explode, however, your reaction is priceless ! LOL Thanks for 10 minutes of humor in my day !

[@GTX4747]

thank you so much dude, now after watching 4 videos, I learned: 1. what is wood gas. 2. create a device to produce wood gas. 3. making that procedure pretty efficient. 4. how much air to mix to make it explode. 5. wipe out all the useless PhD's in my university. and possibly all humanity :)

[@MrDoboz]

that green flame was pretty nice!

[@tinker2561]

How cool is that colour transition of the fire ball from yellow/orange to green. Great work dude!

[@SweetyVoltyy]

Congrats! You found how to make a gravity bong!

[@jamesmanley6721]

1 A flame can not travel through a window screen and if properly sized will pose very little obstruction to gas flow. 2. A propane bottle type tip should increase reliability of flame. 3.A curled piece of copper tubing like on a still will rapidly remove heat even if just exposed to air, even better if run through a small amount of water. 4. a tube run through the bottom or side of your gas collection system that extends to just below your maximum/minimum water level would rapidly remove particles from your gas. 5. I'm not seeing a drying system after the collection tank ? perhaps a large container of wood shavings? 6. would love to see this upgraded to 55 gal drum size with water as the moving element to create pressure inside the drum. 7 THANK YOU FOR SHARING IN A INTELLIGENT FASHION.

[@ReDMooNTVV]

always nice to have an upload from you, Night!

[@treyneitge8537]

I've been planning on building a pallet house for awhile and was looking for a good way to have a working stove in it and I think you've helped me decide what I should go for, so thank you

[@Nighthawkinlight]

A regular wood stove is more efficient than woodgas for direct heating. Either way make sure to have a carbon monoxide detector to stay safe

[@treyneitge8537]

@@Nighthawkinlight this is going to be a very open pallet house, mainly to go camping out at the lake in the backyard whenever I want to, but I appreciate the reply!

[@paulhook8529]

That was interesting you could actually run an internal combustion engine that way

[@sideswipe147]

Yes. People do it all the time. The key is getting the proper fuel air mix. There are tons of videos online demonstrating this. It was a common thing to run vehicles, particularly durring the great wars. (WWI + WWII).

[@njmvermont]

Please make a detailed video on home made gasoline from plastic and diesel from tires. There is no good ones on youtube. Stay safe great video

[@CNCmachiningisfun]

I have had some serious explosions in my wood gasser. These can cause a LOT of damage, and can easily cause personal injury, so due respect is required. Stainless steel scrubbers make for one of the simplest, and most effective, flame arrestors. Keep it safe - keep it fun :) .

[@GarryNichols]

more videos like this, please! That was awesome.

[@Qigate]

Just discovered your videos and they are so much fun to watch. Thanks for sharing and explaining all that you do, great shows!

[@Schradermusic]

I like that you're using my valve. Thumbs up!

[@Nojaru]

The way that container flies off is almost cartoonish. Very entertaining

[@cerealgog4843]

I would love to see what different uses you could come up with using wood gas

[@ANGELM73350]

That's a lotta damage You should fix it with some flex tape

[@GoatChease]

You seemed to have a genuinely good time filming this video, I would definitely like to see more videos like this.

[@randomactsofcooking]

That was fun to watch. Oh, and informative too. Thanks.

[@jelgue]

Explosions AND great high speed shots. I was laughing as well! :)

[@BossOfAllTrades]

Now that I look at it the water is almost like a safety feature itself preventing the heat from expanding

[@daviaquino3625]

03:04 @NightHawkInLight I was testing my new monitor with your video and you do this to me? hahahah great video tho

[@ba2hln14]

Would be cool if you attempted to generate natural gas from compost and store it in a tank

[@ninjasheep8722]

that small green part at the bottom of the explosion, is that realy caused by the bit of copper wiring from the igniter or is it something else?

[@Nighthawkinlight]

Yep, the wire

[@ninjasheep8722]

thx, love how fast you read the comments and reply.

[@erikwalfridsson8790]

I can second that :)

[@chaemelion]

Not so fast! While copper could be part of the source of the green colored flames, my experience with flames and copper wire igniters like this tells me that there's more at work here. Don't forget, boron is an essential mineral for plant cells. I wouldn't be surprised if there are decent levels of organo-boron compounds in your wood gas, and I would expect a lot more boron ions in the vapor than copper. Also, at least from my experiments, boron compounds give a stronger green flame more easily than copper compounds do. +NightHawkInLight Test the theory! Try the same setup with propane or butane!

[@ninjasheep8722]

Boron instantly came to my mind too, but i didn't know that it is so common in plant cells. It would make a lot of sense this way.