It’s about restraint, control and liberation and freedom. It’s incredible
@justingilbert56523 жыл бұрын
I've just finished reading this novel; I enjoyed your summary. Thank you.
@leeah84193 жыл бұрын
You're welcome! It's a great novel 😊
@QaziSaqib3 жыл бұрын
Thank you! 💐
@leeah84193 жыл бұрын
You're welcome 😊
@silpajustin8672 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much mam for your critical view at the book rather than the surface view
@leeah84192 жыл бұрын
You're welcome! 😊
@susanrosegale6646 Жыл бұрын
"A symptom of wealth..." Victorian times was slower paces. "A tranquil boredom; whereas modern times is like a destructive neurosis" Wow, that aged well for 50 years past - pure insanity now. But you made me want to read this intriguing book after watch it on YT. Thank you.
@mujtabasharif64282 жыл бұрын
Hi. you have explained it well. I haven't read the novel. But read the theme and analysis of the novel by various people.
@leeah84192 жыл бұрын
Hi, thanks! This book is amazing! I hope you'll pick it up
@faboseszti3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this summary! I'm watching this 2 hours before an exam, just to get an idea of the book.
@leeah84193 жыл бұрын
Hope you did well at the exam!
@ismailsimsek3322 жыл бұрын
@@leeah8419 Same, can i get a good wish too ?
@leeah84192 жыл бұрын
I'll keep my fingers crossed! 🤞😊
@MJ-Q82 жыл бұрын
Excellent work & wonderful explanation.
@leeah84192 жыл бұрын
Happy you enjoyed it! 😊
@immortaljaat65673 жыл бұрын
Well explained
@leeah84193 жыл бұрын
Thanks! 😊
@nowherenotion21153 жыл бұрын
Very well explained thank you.
@leeah84193 жыл бұрын
Happy to hear that 😊
@ThatsSoPoe3 жыл бұрын
What a fascinating review!! I completely get what you mean about a book where you felt disappointed reading it initially, but then you keep thinking about it and it gains more and more depth each time.
@leeah84193 жыл бұрын
Thanks! Yes, I'm happy that I ended up loving it despite being disappointed because I was expecting romance. But it's one I would like to reread at some point 😊
@new_india_unofficialsince20192 жыл бұрын
Nice
@globalstudiesaspirants57172 жыл бұрын
Really nice
@madalinamanescu29692 жыл бұрын
Hi! Can you help me with intertextuality and historicity in this book?
@leeah84192 жыл бұрын
Hi Madalina, I'm afraid I'm not equipped to help with this, good luck!
@LisaSimpsonRules Жыл бұрын
wow! Are you asking a complete stranger on the internet to do your university assignment for you?
@saigeetharaja94342 жыл бұрын
Loved it❤
@piepie9123 жыл бұрын
Can you do one on women in love by d h Lawrence in 3 days?
@leeah84193 жыл бұрын
I haven't read that one yet but it's on my classics TBR 😊
@TylerDeneuve2 жыл бұрын
Did you like the film adaptation with Meryl Streep?
@leeah84192 жыл бұрын
It was not what I expected but I enjoyed it! 😊
@ashokjain5940 Жыл бұрын
@@leeah8419 Thanks for being honest again. The film is no less complex than the book. Harold Pinter, the famous British playwright, split Sarah’s character right down the middle to create the Victorian Sarah Woodruff and the modern star Ms Ruffwood. Mark the play with the surnames which sets the tone to visually narrate the psychological drama of Fowles. Not many would have the insight into the film medium to truly appreciate the movie.
@ashokjain5940 Жыл бұрын
A very honest effort to appreciate a difficult book. I find some guys on the comments section not happy about Amelia’s perspective here, but pl give her some space. Sometimes it’s a pleasure to come across innocent and spontaneous reactions to work of art and her’s falls into the category.. Fowles’ novels, particularly this one, is very complex as he plays not only with time but with intense socio psychological themes. They say English novels do not measure upto the depth found in their continental counterparts, particularly when you take those created by Gogol, Balzac, Stendhal, Dostoevsky, Tolstoy, Flaubert or Proust. For me the one coming closest to that standard would be French Lieutenant’s Woman. To Amelia, 1963 may seem to you a long time ago, but that was right within the e and technology most happening period in human history both in terms of science and technology ( space missions, icbm, initial i etc) and of deep social changes borne out of aggressive social movements( women’s lib, civil rights, height of Cold War, on set of Vietnam, Beatles, global students’ unrest etc. The definition of morality and basic human relationships never went through such jolts as in the 1960s. No wonder Fowles took inspiration from all of it to dig into the hubris and of Victorian morality at the time. The interesting lines at the beginning of each chapter more than explain it.
@babettesfeast63474 ай бұрын
Published in 1969
@dayonajohnson40233 жыл бұрын
Wooww really nice..❤️
@leeah84193 жыл бұрын
Thank you! 😊
@titiavandeneertwegh31703 жыл бұрын
Sounds like a complicated novel.
@leeah84193 жыл бұрын
It is an interesting one for sure! 😊
@bluecollarlit3 жыл бұрын
Excellent video and analysis. My own recommendation is, read the novel, and then watch the film.
@leeah84193 жыл бұрын
Thank you! Yes, I saw that the movie was with Nicole Kidman, I hope it's as good as the book 😊
@bluecollarlit3 жыл бұрын
@@leeah8419 Meryl Streep and Jeremy Irons play the leading roles in the movie. - - - - - - - Have you read the novel, Emma, by Jane Austen? It's my favorite out of her 6 books. Very humorous. --------------- Have a great day.
@leeah84193 жыл бұрын
@@bluecollarlit It is Meryl Streep! What was i thinking! 😂 I have read Emma and have also seen many of it's adaptations! Jane Austen is amazing, I love her books! Have a nice day! 😊
@ΔεαΚ2 жыл бұрын
I have never heard a worse review of a book.. I havent read the book so I understand none of the things said because she doesnt make a summary of it leaving us in air