Exx-019 Homopolar Generator - Breakthrough - Voltage Multiplication!

[@donaldwright2426]

I am also fascinated by the homopolar engine. What intrigues me most is the high current. So, why not use a disk or cylinder that is diametrically magnetized. May there be a north and south pole that will turn, you will have an alternative tension in the milivolts. Now, connect ignation transformer, you will have finally the voltage of the 2 digits and maybe even 3. I would probably use a copper layer on the outer rim of the cylinder. Nice work by the way!

[@TrentTationnaiseXization]

So you should be able to add an array of brushes to increase the output correct? Even on a single rotor?

[@wyattbielert2929]

Could you use impulse electricity in the form of a spoked rotor like a commutator that cuts the connection and then reconnects it after x degrees of rotation or a capacitor that captures the dc impulse

[@georgeroman9379]

How many ampere? did you measure?

[@adampatton1]

I love what you are trying to do here and that you are sharing it publicly so I want to help lead you in the right direction if I can. Keep in mind what you are doing has little to do with the magnet and more so angular momentum and relative movement. I hope I don't come off as condescending as that is not my intention so know that I myself am still experimenting and learning about this. If you have a chance I highly recommend a read through this as it will help clarify what I am talking about. vixra.org/pdf/1604.0007v1.pdf I look forward to future videos :-)

[@AdolfoRiosPitaGiurfa]

Tension=E is directly proportional to frequency and inversely to wavelength, i.e.SIZE, diameter of the Faraday´s disk

[@serpentine1983]

Putting these generators in series to get higher voltages has been done since at least 1973. Do not see anything new here. What am I missing? Because you claim IP for this. And I only see you putting generators in series. Where am I wrong? Thanks.

[@scienceexxience]

It is well known that voltage can be increased through connection of batteries and capacitors in series. The functioning principle of the different types of electric motors is equally well known. And still, there are patents issued for electric motors on a regular basis. This is based on the different details regarding prior art. Returning to our claim, we have not found anyone demonstrating this particular way for the connection of these RADIAL magnets. If you found something, we would be interested to know.

[@nichevl]

You have some nice experimental display though a bit risky with cable ties and rods though good the speeds are low. Fyi experiments on efficiency were done early 20th century and at very high speeds too and in various series configurations as well yet all were lossy for all sorts of reasons, take a look through old patents. The principle of series operation is a general paradigm applicable to anything as is the parallel paradigm and thus as any umbrella concept it applies to anything whether rotating or not, whether magnet or not. There is a principle in patents not just a specifics implementation eg there a general concept applied to components by anyone in the field, meaning the general concept of 'series' applied to components 'magnets' etc ie been done to death many many times whether magnets, fuel cells, coils of wire, LEDs which collect light as well as emit, solar cells, piezoelectric etc. I'm an engineer and ran a lab for 30 years investigating all sorts of motor/generator claims and read so many patents, most these days Very easy to challenge as so much prior art though won't stop anyone copying for research ie can't stop them since no commercial return ie can't sue. There are better ways to make $ from your idea and that means Not publishing IP or patent or copyright ie Instead design a sizable product that uses your approach and put it inside something hard to get to, eg generator the size of a house that's hard to move etc. Though of course have to prove viability First which means mucho $ On the last point it's far more cost effective and simpler ie one humongous Faraday type disc then feed into large scale switch mode power supply (SMPS) so even as little as 50 to 100mV input from a one meter diameter disc at say 3000rpms and 15 Amps can be up-converted to whatever volts you want AC or DC but, efficiency losses all the way through. Suggest look up the high power 2000000 (2 million) amp homopolar genset tested in military use to drive rail guns to 10Km/sec non explosive projectiles, needed Very high currents but, hugely inefficient. Someone did a study that superconducting was the only way to go or you lose too much power via conduction is must use copper or silver which chew the power :-( though still rather lossy, but how do you keep friction losses down at liquid nitrogen temps whilst spinning the rotor at few thousand rpms And pulling power out all the same time - physics for this been analysed with calculus too. Worth sitting in on a uni lecture for 2nd year electrical machine practice in physics and at end ask the lecturer, shouldn't cost anything...Good luck Catch me on here and leave a message www.quora.com/profile/Mike-Massen I can design a SMPS of very high current for suitable dollars, there are also many who worked on the Physics at very high level, none have ever found anything other than losses though a lot less loss at liquid nitrogen temperatures, cheers

[@theq4602]

SMPs are probably far too expensive to do with such currents, at the required efficiencies (80+ Titanium) it would be crazy $$$. I bet the real secret is designing the rotor to reduce eddy currents much like low frequency ultra high permeability transformer steel. Build it in laminations that are electrically isolated except at the shaft and at the rotor circumference. The magnetic field across the whole rotor reduces eddy currents radially but I bet it does not reduce them axially along the rotor. I'd like to see someone build one of these using 'Bitter' electromagnets since they are current hogs and current is exactly what this device makes in spades, as well as creating the most powerful magnetic fields yet attained.

[@emf321]

What do you mean when you say both sides of a DC currents is at each brush? Do you mean each brush is both a positive and negative pole? This doesn't really makes sense, since each brush will then cancel out each other, positive and negative charges at each brush resulting in no flow between brushes? In any event, the current can only be in one direction since there are only free moving electrons going one way, no positive ions moving in the opposite way like you might find in ionic plasma? More clarity on this point will be appreciated.

[@scienceexxience]

Electricity is more than just moving electrons. Nikola Tesla and other have made that point Our experiments in videos Exx-013 through Exx-018 lead to the assumption that each brush is producing both sides of a DC current. The difference in potential lead to a flow of current, similar to the action of an induction coil, which also has both poles.

[@franksabolich3996]

Where do you get radial magnets? They are hard to magnetize that way. Can somebody post a link please

[@scienceexxience]

We found them in China, but have no link ATM.

[@littlebenoit16]

You beat me to it! I just got the magnets saturday. Still going to do it though

[@littlebenoit16]

On a side note. I wonder how many people have already tried this method before. We couldn't possibly be the only 2 that were looking for a way to increase voltage to a usable level on these simple generators.

[@scienceexxience]

The video was recorded on Jan/09/2019. This method is a logical step when one applies the results of our discovery (videos Exx-013 through Exx-018) that the brushes create both sides of the DC current.

[@scienceexxience]

Seems unlikely that this particular method was used before. The focus was always on the magnets, not on the brushes.

[@beforebefore]

This has been done before... many times, and at least 10 years ago that I know of... it's not a difficult extrapolation by any means. One example: kzbin.info/www/bejne/oHWvoGhobL6jjNk

[@scienceexxience]

They are talking about regular, axially magnetized, magnets in that video.

[@ovidius2000]

whatIfThisIsCombinedWithAVanDeGrafGenerator?

[@allhumansarejusthuman.5776]

Wonderful presantation. Although. Its neither new or novel to wire togther low voltage power supplies to gain high voltage, even if you got a patient it would be indefensible, and, running Faraday drums in series is hardly new, they use them to generate high amperage 6v dc current in portable welding I am about 90% certain they do so with a simular arrangment, and have for almost a century. I do wish you all the best of luck, and hope you come up with something novel.

[@scienceexxience]

Can you point out a link where this set-up has been used? We would be interested to see it. We have not found anything that matches.

[@allhumansarejusthuman.5776]

@@scienceexxience Sure. I charge 160 per hour.

[@scienceexxience]

We take this answer as no, you cannot provide a proof for your claim that our set-up has been used before.

[@petiayaneva3370]

Can this engine give more energy than it is used?

[@scienceexxience]

We have not run tests for efficiency, yet.

[@Steve_Just_Steve]

I like your vids and think you're way under subbed, but would almost guarantee it's because you don't narrate your vids. Would make for much better to hear some explain the theories. ATB

[@jessereiter328]

You can claim it and don’t care but I and others have done it . For true over unity other problems have to be addressed good luck. The real problem is most don’t live long enough to mass produce and make money off the public the ones that really need it

[@manudehanoi]

that's additive not multiplicative

[@scienceexxience]

1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 = 5 same as 1 * 5 = 5

[@manudehanoi]

@@scienceexxience you add the same amount of mV per extra disk, voltage is added , not multiplied. A transformer for example multiplies the Voltage/current

[@scienceexxience]

If you look at it per disk it is addition (agreed) - if you look at it for the whole unit it is multiplication.

[@excelsior8682]

@@scienceexxience I believe he mentioned this for the sake of scalability. In that instance it is indeed additive

[@HealthCodeHealing]

Just dump the voltage into a capacitor and you will get highr voltage so dont bother trying to device a way to increase voltage not needed. Just work with the size of disks you have. The real trick behind this effect is high amps but low voltage, so you just step it up with caps. Also the bigger the disks the closer you get to free energy. Their is a critical mass threshold to overcome to get "free" enegy were the device can run itself. Also you can get alternating current using a simple attachment ( you should know, I am not saying) Dont go crazy replicating and profiting off of this idea. You will be not happy with who comes knocking. Enjoy for yourself :)

[@scienceexxience]

We are posting the results of our research in an effort to overcome the low voltage situation of homopolar applications. Caps can only do that much, it wouldn't increase voltage significantly.