f1.8 vs f1.2 is one full stop. Here's what you need to know ✨Lightroom Presets: bit.ly/3TDLKMx 📧 LET'S CONNECT: gugliotta.one/... #photography #phototips
Пікірлер: 179
@TechnoBabble9 ай бұрын
Bit of a correction. The f-stop is not the physical size of the iris, but the apparent size of the entrance pupil when viewed through the front of the lens.
@sealdraws19848 ай бұрын
I was wondering about that since some lenses have f0.8
@johndododoe14117 ай бұрын
It's diameter divided by focal length . An F/0.8 lens is short with a wide hole to let in more light to the sensor .
@TechnoBabble7 ай бұрын
@@johndododoe1411 yes, the f-stop is the ratio between the focal length and the apparent size of the entrance pupil when viewed through the front of the lens.
@NoName-ys9zf5 ай бұрын
😅
@Freshboxxgroup5 ай бұрын
You kinda got it right
@raghunathdas63509 ай бұрын
I need a Detailed video on LENS covering the topics : 1. Technical terms 2. How they work 3. Types and varieties 4. tips and tricks
@MisterMustardIsDumb9 ай бұрын
this dude isn’t the only source of info on the internet.. i understand recommending content but if you need it there is elsewhere
@DinkyDingus9 ай бұрын
Second. This short barely makes any sense
@ruffprophetproductions8 ай бұрын
Not to be a dh but there’s other people on this platform that have made videos about this. Anthony’s video is serving as a intro and hopefully this inspires you to go do more research 😁
@oversharingturtle44628 ай бұрын
I recommend reading about this sorta thing. Not just on forums. And if you want a video, then there are existing ones. I’m sure if you search ‘f stop explained’ you’ll get heaps of videos or ‘lens aperture explained photography’
@nahyanrajee1988 ай бұрын
There's a in-depth course called lectures in digital photography by Marc Levoy here in KZbin. There's more in-depth explanations about these things in there. Check it out if you have the time and dedication
@johndododoe14117 ай бұрын
Each stop doubles the area, so two stops double the diameter and thus the number . One stop is thus square root of 2 bigger . Hence the list 1, 1.4, 2, 2.8, 4, 5.6, 8, 11, 16, 22, 32 .
@link34577 ай бұрын
Oml that makes so much sense tysm
@reneeschke5 ай бұрын
I see the numbers working out, but dont quite get it logically.
@johndododoe14115 ай бұрын
@@reneeschke The iris covers the lens opening to reduce the amount of light that reaches the center . Lena manufacturers place the iris at a position where doing so has the traditional effect . The iris stop is the focal length divided by the hole diameter . So at F5.6, the hole leftover in a 56mm lens is 10mm in diameter . In a 280mm telephoto lens, F5.6 would open the iris to 50mm wide .
@reneeschke5 ай бұрын
@@johndododoe1411 what I see but dont get is the relation of "1 stop doubles area, so 2 stops double diameter of 'open iris'"
@HTLeap5 ай бұрын
@@reneeschkeArea = (Diameter²)*π/4, which can be rearranged to Diameter = √(Area*4/π), meaning when you ×2 the Area (the goal of f-stops) then you only ×√2 the Diameter, so although the Area doubles per stop, the f-stop (based on the diameter of the iris(?)) only increases at the rate of the multiplicative half, which is √2.
@ItzSlushie9 ай бұрын
I’m still processing this after the 3rd watch
@RayBlaxe9 ай бұрын
My 3g brain 🫨
@Pouncer_Fox6 ай бұрын
Me hear words. Me no understand words.
@Dominic.c6 ай бұрын
Basically aperture is how much light, so like he says f/2 of a 50mm lens is 25mm meaning you are getting 25mm of light 👍
@stakamaka5 ай бұрын
but what does 25mm of light mean to us 😐
@stakamaka5 ай бұрын
oh, it means it's brighter 😮
@elzafir7 ай бұрын
To be more precise, the number represents the size of 'entrance pupil' diameter, not the actual aperture size. Entrance pupil is the aperture when viewed from the front of the lens, which is different than the actual size of the aperture. This is the easiest to visualize in variable aperture zooms. When we zoom in, the aperture from the back doesn't actually change size, but when viewed from the front the entrance pupil looks like it become smaller because the optics moved, thus we have larger aperture number (smaller aperture).
@Its-me_Sazid.9 ай бұрын
Damn, camera lenses are the beauty of science ❤
@kimasher6 ай бұрын
I trained under a master photographer 30 years ago. I used to teach post-grad photography a long time back. You are the first person, apart from myself, who I have ever seen explain the incredibly basic mathematics of how the F-stops are just related to the diameter and surface area of the diaphragm. So simple, so useful to know, so neglected. Now, do you know why we had 8 bit colour channels? I’ll give you a clue. Humans can typically perceive 255 shades of grey between black and white. ;-)
@khay22108 ай бұрын
This guy is a legend. All this knowledge has leveled up my gear choices and general knowledge on camera bodies and the gears that works best for me, not every gear you recommend was for me, but there are some like the prograde card and the Rode wireless pro, then the knowledge on how to use ND filter and CPL filters. I just want to say a big thank you.
@spainweddingphotography9 ай бұрын
400 weddings and I just learnt how aperture stops calculated 😂love videos like this! ❤
@elestudiodebuenavista6288 ай бұрын
@@Boris-dq3ubI want too to be photographer, I love spending my afternoon shooting in the beach. And making my passion into a job it would be a dream
@tdawg7198 ай бұрын
Just goes to show that wedding photography is mostly an ability to handle stress 😂
@ORGPianoTutorial8 ай бұрын
I guess probably 100-200$ per wedding @@Boris-dq3ub
@Repudiate6 ай бұрын
@@elestudiodebuenavista628If you want to run a photography business, most of the time will not be spent on photographing people. It’s mostly paper work, networking, editing, etc. Making that art really needs to be a passion for you if you want to be successful.
@Repudiate6 ай бұрын
@@Boris-dq3ub you probably already know this but generally gross profits will be relatively high and net profits low. The margin can vary based on experience, equipment costs, location, business expenses, business efficiency, etc. 🧸🧃
@luuketaylor9 ай бұрын
Time for me to sleep, but I'll definitely be watching the full video tomorrow after work!
@ambrosevonerkel58288 ай бұрын
Bloody brilliant, I’ve been doing fotografy for decades and never knew about this phormula
@akyerit8 ай бұрын
Not the best explanation lol, but i appreciate the try for sure. Needed to be broken down/simplified a little bit more/better
@bbpreelinsight6 ай бұрын
Remarkably informative!
@shoots_austin9 ай бұрын
It would be cool to see a graph of diameter against f stop
@tbgayan15 ай бұрын
Thank you 😊
@aa9899 ай бұрын
So does it mean that if you have a cheap 120 mm lens with F 3.5 aperture give better bokeh than a 35 mm lens with F1.2, as the diameter is more?
@mainakmajumder46488 ай бұрын
Telephoto lenses usually give better Bokeh than wide lenses. But that 35mm f/1.2 will have better low light performance than that 120mm at f/3.5
@aidenlee78978 ай бұрын
120mm is Better for depth of field even tho it’s f/3.5 but f/1.2 is better for low low situations
@drkasix7 ай бұрын
120 / 3.5 = 34,3 Diameter ; 35 / 1.2 = 29,2 Diameter so u probably have slight more opening with the 120.
@artmaltman7 ай бұрын
Fascinating videos. Please do them without the distracting music. Thank you.
@hfageeh5 ай бұрын
Valuable information thanks
@Mathew-vlogs9 ай бұрын
I didn’t know this 😅 but this does raise a question. If I wanted a 24mm with a 0.95 aperture. It’s just over a 21mm circumference. But 20mm f1.4 lenses are pretty huge. Do you think you can explain why these lenses have to actually be larger then with the formula suggests?
@patrickmeyer28029 ай бұрын
It's not the actual physical size of the actual physical aperture, it's the size that it appears to be when looking through the lens (which is a fucky concept to get you head around, but I think Gerald Undone has a good video about it). The smaller the focal length, the smaller the aperture appears to be when looking through the lens, so for f/0.95 @ 24mm, you would require a ludicrously large aperture if you wanted to cover full frame. f.95 lenses that wide do exist, but they're designed to cover m43 sensors.
@Mathew-vlogs9 ай бұрын
@@patrickmeyer2802 okay thanks. I’ll try to check out that video.
@donald6278 ай бұрын
Insightful. Now what does a smaller aperture provide to a photo versus a larger aperture-50mm vs. 25mm (f/2)? Does it mean like letting in more or less light into photo?, Things like wider means more picture versus less opening of the lens?
@TheDuketube5 ай бұрын
Today I learned something new
@Tacochamp1239 ай бұрын
Holy heck. Never would’ve known that. Thanks!
@platosbeard34769 ай бұрын
Aperture science! For the good of all of us, apart from those that are dead 🎂
@eroll28 ай бұрын
This isnt right its not the size of the aperture opening..
@afdyaziz42808 ай бұрын
Can u explain what STOP is? And where to find them in the settings or understand them?
@charlessands34585 ай бұрын
Is the ratio between the actual aperture opening and the diameter of the field lens behind the aperture opening. Unlike most people, I came to photography from astronomy. In astronomy, what is referred to as aperture in photography is referred to as focal ratio - which should be the term used.
@ShinyTechThings6 ай бұрын
Now compare F stops to T stops 😎
@mitchbrown39115 ай бұрын
This earnt a sub
@harikarthigasu13029 ай бұрын
Great! Insightful
@birdkings699 ай бұрын
Great, now i also need math for photography... 💀
@coin7777 ай бұрын
You need math in life kid
@birdkings696 ай бұрын
@@coin777 What kid lmaoo 😭💀
@B9poy4 ай бұрын
@@coin777not everyone is amused by math and calculations like you
@muhammadaudyperdanaginting16378 ай бұрын
Nice info 💯
@NDIDA124 ай бұрын
So 105mm at F4 lets in more light than 24mm at F4? Since the opening is larger ?
@charlessands69339 ай бұрын
Anyone who engages in visual astronomy nose this is the focal ratio. The follicle ratio in photography perhaps people would understand it better
@sidreckjohn48875 ай бұрын
I need another video explaining this video
@koalamusik5 ай бұрын
So, how does the famous f/0.98 lens work?
@TomPark19867 ай бұрын
Been wanting a 24mm 1.2......need to win a small lottery 😭😭😭😭
@magimusician5 ай бұрын
Using the same formula and a 24-70mm f2.8 lens, is the diameter of 24mm/2.8 the same as 70/2.8?
@MaxKudlaCom7 ай бұрын
Does it mean that 50mm f/1.2 and 85mm f/2 gets the same amount of light?
@kanji61535 ай бұрын
How this helps me to take better photos?
@MartinGollery5 ай бұрын
It's actually the inverse square. 1.4 ² is 2. 2² is 4. 2.8² is 8
@hukmai8 ай бұрын
Can we use Tstops
@spacemonkey2007 ай бұрын
All you need to know is it's half the area. F2 = 1/2 the area. Nothing to do with diameter. It's area.
@Truth_seeker-bl5mi9 ай бұрын
So 50mm is the focal length...that means 50 mm is the focus distance where when an object is sharp beacuse the light rays converge at 50mm from focal plane of lens. So if f2 means 50/2 =25... then the aperture becomes double the 50 then light rays converge more nearer to focal plane that is 25mm.....is this correct?
@skylines.media16 ай бұрын
my math teacher after saying today will be a fun lesson
@kawai-san3 ай бұрын
Me with no camera no lens 🥲
@nedkelly20359 ай бұрын
Actually, use of T-stops would be more accurate, but that has never been adopted and probably never will be in still photography.
@TechnoBabble9 ай бұрын
T-stops is more accurate for light gathering (in the center, it doesn't account for vignetting) but f-stops are the actual size of the entrance pupil. So two 50mm f1.4 lenses should have the same amount of background blur and the same depth to their field of focus, even if they transmit different amounts of light.
@nedkelly20359 ай бұрын
@@TechnoBabble Correct. Optics 101.
@TechnoBabble9 ай бұрын
@@nedkelly2035 I realized I kinda forgot my point. Stills lenses will probably never use t-stops because it's not accurate for the look of the image. F-stops tell you how the image will look whereas t-stops are a technical exposure measurement.
@rashadalmilad9 ай бұрын
Dude ... 1.4 is a stop ... no need to complicate it to get views 1. 1.4. 2. 2.8 .... etc.
@ryanshootsphoto50355 ай бұрын
wait so does that mean that 2.8 on a 24-70 is different than the 2.8 on my 70-200?
@ThePaulRyder345 ай бұрын
So I’m just about to start out with DSLR. I’m getting a couple of lenses. This just has me baffled. What is the effect of different F’s?
@darthsnarf3 ай бұрын
its how open the front of the lens is, therefore how much light gets into the lens. but opening it more causes more of it to be out of focus, refered to as bokeh. if you open the lens to 1.8 the separation of the subject from the background will be more pronounced, and inversely if you step down to say f32 you will have the subject and the background in focus, but you will need to compensate for the lost light in other ways.
@parenthecoltsenr7 ай бұрын
What is a stop though
@Aviyal_paruvam8 ай бұрын
Example for nikon z 50/f2.0 z 50 /f1.8
@footyargs48958 ай бұрын
What camera and lens did you use for this video?
@mishelmudryk9 ай бұрын
Still confusing 😕 i need full video on it
@Jacobs_photography_20244 ай бұрын
Or you could just go with the smaller the number the blurrier the background 😅
@hchavez5 ай бұрын
Please explain again
@p.t.ngwolo10039 ай бұрын
Sorry it’s 1.25 stops.
@ArtGamesBG9 ай бұрын
Oh my… took me a few attempts to understand but… does that mean that a 24-70 f/2.8 is lighter than the 14-24 f/2.8?🤨
@deez53968 ай бұрын
For m43 lenses would you use the m43 numbers or the full frame equivalent
@chromium46687 ай бұрын
The f stop of mft is doubled just as focal length is, so i imagine just use full frame equivalent
@aidanalvarez17229 ай бұрын
Waiting for him to start talking about the physics of optics. Hopefully next video…😂
@saswatsarangi66699 ай бұрын
What's the stop
@phantom_parkour9 ай бұрын
What's better a cheap second hand camera for 300 or a phone
@rubenreijgwart9 ай бұрын
Cheap second hand camera for sure
@NVAfilm9 ай бұрын
This is why t-stop is better
@Joeldca7 ай бұрын
F/1.4 when?
@valencia80779 ай бұрын
What does "One full stop" means? Can someone explain, please?
@ethan_webb8 ай бұрын
+1 stop means 2x more light. Typical stop numbers are 1, 1.4, 2, 2.8, 4, 5.6, 8, and so on. Each one of those gaps is a "stop" different. Half of them are fractions because we're dealing with light as a 2d image, so opening the aperture 1.4 times more results in 1.4^2 (~2x) more light.
@photos288015 ай бұрын
Seven times Four equals splevndyfour.
@drs-Rigo-Reus7 ай бұрын
1.8 is 1,5 times smaller than 1.2
@allandnc44027 ай бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂 he is so convinced of what he's saying 😂😂
@Tlyrc9 ай бұрын
F4 vs F16 ?
@argierog7 ай бұрын
Asks question A.. Answers question B...
@Sanket.vjadhav8 ай бұрын
How is f0.95 possible then?
@Work-Horse8 ай бұрын
So do.... aperture reduces on APS C ?
@user-xl5op6tn8o8 ай бұрын
No
@Work-Horse8 ай бұрын
@@user-xl5op6tn8o thankiiiiiiiii
@Work-Horse8 ай бұрын
@@user-xl5op6tn8o so.... In reality... APS-C never have same perspective of lens as written on lens (even if it's made for APS-S itself) ? 😀
@user-xl5op6tn8o8 ай бұрын
@@Work-Horse focal distance (mm) for aps-c if you use full frame lens is always 1.5 times more, but aperture and other specs stay the same
@Work-Horse8 ай бұрын
@@user-xl5op6tn8o many many thanks Brother 😀😀🌝😁🌝🌝
@danielmolina805 ай бұрын
I'm kinda confused 😂
@NoName-pj1xg8 ай бұрын
I'm here to take pictures not do math :(
@Nochift1385 ай бұрын
Still don't quite get it
@TheDonkeko9 ай бұрын
And the end of the day we just wanna shoot in f8,f4 and f2 Lol!
@mr.filmer2068 ай бұрын
Its 2 stop of difference
@redcolour11976 ай бұрын
But you didn't explain f1.2 and f1.8.
@johnlocke34817 ай бұрын
1/1.2 is not twice as big as 1/1.8 😂😂😂
@judem4295 ай бұрын
Naw. It’s inversely proportional price. F1 costs a lot more than f4.
@toni.rovinj5 ай бұрын
I already make my life 100x harder to make a cup of coffee (coffee nerd), now even photography... nah uh uh ahhahahah
@auroraflash5 ай бұрын
Stop. Just stop. Stop. It’s all about the extra stop. 😂
@Iamherenow28987 ай бұрын
... Ok. I'm lost. ...
@thaich.hamelin4635 ай бұрын
So show me your 180mm lens at f2 😂
@IAmLollos9 ай бұрын
How did you get wildly high areas? The area should be pi×d. Your first number should be slightly higher than 155 mm^2
@hungjuryadept33639 ай бұрын
π*d is the perimeter not the area, the area is π*(r^2) or π*[(d/2)^2]
@IAmLollos9 ай бұрын
@@hungjuryadept3363 you're right. I was foolish and spoke without confirming.
@kokiansstudio9 ай бұрын
Then how about the noctilux 0.95? Seems like the maths is off
@jasper2323239 ай бұрын
If f-stop is the focal length divided by the aperture, then the a 0.95 has a slightly wider opening than focal length when wide open.
@edgaramezquita51925 ай бұрын
Actually... it doesnt matter, as long as you get the shoot and is sharp ( usually two steps down) you will be ok.... or not,.. lol ,,,, ha...!!!
@DavidSenteno9 ай бұрын
You lost me at “Math”. 😂
@danielakinoshita9 ай бұрын
So how's it one stop?
@hugoingelhammar61639 ай бұрын
Because if you multiply the diameter of the aperture with the square root of 2 (≈1.41) you get twice the area/ 2x the amount of light. This equals 1 stop. And 1.2 x 1.41 ≈ 1.8
@bennieferinga96099 ай бұрын
If this formula is right, it still can't apply for all lenses. Example: A 600mm f4 lens would then have a 150mm (15cm) aperture diameter! The whole lens is not so fat! And: What about constant aperture zoom lenses? In a zoom lens, let's say a 24-70mm f2.8, where the aperture is the same in all focal lengths, this formula can't be relevant. 24/2.8 = 8.57mm, and 70/2.8 = 25mm.??? I hope someone has an explanation for this..
@ethan_webb8 ай бұрын
It is wrong, the actual aperture doesn't have to be that large, it only has to appear that large from the front of the lens. This is called the "Entrance Pupil". It does however mean the lens' front element has to be at least that size, but that's it. As for zoom lenses I got no idea those things are complicated. They still follow the rule but why the aperture remains constant is beyond me
@bennieferinga96098 ай бұрын
@@ethan_webb Thanks for replying. Okay, so the size of the front element, and how big the aperture appears from it. Strange. In zoom lenses there are probably more factors, perhaps distance inside the lens or something. Thanks again for explaining 😊
@p.t.ngwolo10039 ай бұрын
It’s 1.5 stops.
@calebplumleeoutdoors5 ай бұрын
Ok, now do this math with a 600mm F4 and come back with the correct explanation after you realize a 5.9" physical aperture opening ain't it bruh
@HerzhaTheShapeshifter9 ай бұрын
The math is literally just (1.8/1.2)²
@demelkon9 ай бұрын
What?
@woohoosocal34899 ай бұрын
Just get 50mm f1.0
@VISHALKUMAR-bs3th8 ай бұрын
Too complex
@iComplainer9 ай бұрын
I watch this dudes shorts solely out of anger. 😂 who is his target?? AFAICT its for people who can buy the higher end consumer level gear but have very little actual know-how and need the most basic photographic factoids.