FAA reports UFO epidemic!! PLUS, a UAP the size of two aircraft carriers??

The FAA is reporting a massive increase in UFO activity! From nuclear reactors to military airfields, the reports are legion!
PLUS, in 1987, a Japanese airliner was reportedly stalked by an enormous UFO! What did the FAA have to say about it?
#space #alien #uap
Please support my channel! AS LITTLE AS 10 CENTS A DAY!!
DISCORD MEMBERSHIP, EXCLUSIVE CONTENT AND EARLY RELEASES PLUS 15% OFF MERCH!
/ angryastronaut
www.paypal.com/paypalme/Angry...
Follow me on twitter:
/ astro_angry

[@cosmicjustice4139]

Lol ah yes... When experienced pilots mistake a clear view of Jupiter to be as big as 2 aircraft carriers 😂 That has to be the WORST explanation.

[@RockinRobbins13]

As we can see from the deluded fighter pilots who were stupid enough to supply the contradictory evidence of their HUDs, Pilots are NOT the most credible source of information about UAPs. In many ways, they're worse than lay people.

[@tomray8765]

We can call it a "Sweep it under the rug" explanation, just some random Scientific sounding BS put out without consideration for what was seen, in hopes that the public and press will lose interest and forget about it. An old 1950s approach that seemed to work at the time. Hopefully, the public is growing too sophisticated to be suckered by such approaches nowadays.

[@MichaelWinter-ss6lx]

Sounds logical ;•) the plane is very high, so Jupiter is much closer and bigger!

[@ssapp72]

Swamp gas probably refracted off venus…

[@jamescoyle4899]

@@MichaelWinter-ss6lxlol the size of a aircraft carrier. Jupiter must’ve moved that night so much closer to earth. Really!

[@Davidleem1]

A professional pilot being unable to distinguish a closely following aircraft from Jupiter - a bright, stationary dot among the stars - is a rationalization fashioned by idiots, for idiots.

[@Mike-zx1kx]

My favourite are "Swamp gas" but guess that explanation have been so ridiculed it have gone out of fashion.

[@faheyplayer]

yeah, that’s right up there with the Navy who doesn’t understand how their radar works.

[@robg6202]

I should have read your statement first. I basically said the same thing rofl..😂

[@54321tts]

Not at all. Pilots are even tought, that regardless of experince level you will always be suceptible to illusions. Human senses are simply not evolved to fly. Many pilots, even highly experienced ones, lost their lives relying on their senses instead of procedures or instruments. It’s not unusual for a highly trained pilot to mistake a star for another objects.

[@farmerlarbear2244]

Not even rationalizing, just flat out insulting everyone’s intelligence.,

[@eliwestbrook7567]

Someone please show me fucking picture of Jupiter that looks like a UFO please! They say that stupid shit, but they never give an example.

[@darrenscriven3963]

That's because as soon as anyone sees it, they will instantly know that explanation is a blatant lie!

[@RockinRobbins13]

Show me the f'in picture of the giant UFO, please! It doesn't exist.

[@kenmcnaughton5882]

The debunking guy needs Bull fucking if he thinks anyone would think that Jupiter looked like the size if two aircraft carriers. This thing was just outside the window for christ sake.

[@PoliticalJames]

idk about that but you can view Jupiter and 2-3 of its moons with just some binoculars, I have a point and shoot Nikon p1000 that can see 3-4 bands and 3 moons

[@tlove2108]

​@@RockinRobbins13 Have you ever stopped and thought of the governments ability to censor things? For that matter there are LOTS of pictures how many of these pictures has the public said were hoaxes? At this point it is a bigger leap for me to not believe.

[@user-ml4xh9fh7q]

Jupiter??? How the hell would Jupiter look that big from 30,000ft? They really think we are that stupid smh.

[@RockinRobbins13]

Venus gets reported in a similar manner all the time. It's a psychological thing. You have no meaningful depth perception. If your brain assigns a size to an object, that comes from a mistake in judging distance. And that doesn't happen to stupid people. It happens to experienced pilots. I'm sure you watched the detailed explanation of that, with several examples, in the NASA press briefing Angry Astronaut laughed at. You should have learned. AA didn't.

[@MichaelWinter-ss6lx]

Confusing the Moon for Jupiter.

[@maccagrabme]

Good, these aliens need to make as many sightings as possible so there is no denying their existence, if necessary come down and land so we can all get hd video and put this nonsense to bed and move on as a species. 80 years is taking the p1ss, we want the truth.

[@RockinRobbins13]

@@maccagrabme We have the truth. There's not a bit of evidence that aliens might possibly be visiting Earth. No good photographs. No physical evidence. No good video. No reason to believe that these "aliens" are nothing but wishful thinking by those making up a new religion.

[@hunterrb2]

We need to stop waiting on the system employees to give us the truth, because they are not going to. FAA, NASA, SpaceX, Military pilots, Commercial pilots, Coast Guards, Federal Agencies, etc will more than likely remain silent in this country. 🤔

[@kevinmaloney2391]

My uncle who was a captain for Northwest Orient airlines was flying west bound over Kansas in 1986. When the copilot noticed a bright light ahead of them. They requested to descend with Kansas ATC. ATC did not have any radar return on the object. He said they flew underneath it. He said it took about 15 seconds to pass beneath it and it looked like the Empire state building on its side. I asked if he reported it, he looked at me and said" are you kidding?"

[@glenwaldrop8166]

The pilot mistook Jupiter for a giant space ship? That's the single stupidest excuse I've ever heard, it even tops 'swamp gas'.

[@pauloalvesdesouza7911]

Excellent content as usual. One suggestion concerning the Alien week: you should finish with "Stay Angry about UFOs!"

[@aaaaa5272]

I suggest that he starts a new channel.

[@obiwanceleri]

OH YES! :) Nice suggestion Pauloalvesdesousa!

[@rickyfitness252]

Regurgitate harder

[@theanonymouschannel930]

@@aaaaa5272 Oh, absolutely. Mr. Angry obviously knows that he make a lot more from the UFO videos. Wouldn't be surprised if he ditches the "space" channel completely.

[@robertjennings7282]

If I were a pilot, I would always have a 4K video camera that performs well in low light every time I fly. If I were Richard Branson, who has a vested interest in aircraft and spacecraft technology, I would require video cameras in the cockpits of all Virgin jetliners.

[@anthonyc5039]

I suspect the government would “discourage” something like this. I sometimes think Elon is under a NDA or directive since he receives so much government funding.

[@kms08711]

Actually this is a common mistake everybody makes... i have a cinema camera and it can't even take a video of the moon clearly You don't need a 4k camera you need a nikon p900 type camera with optical zooms!!!!! Do not follow this advice

[@ThePhobiaCrew]

@@anthonyc5039Elon 100% part of or heavily funded and gifted by the higher groups in the know. No way Elon can claim there is no evidence of anomalies when he has space X. Even his live space launches capture a number of anomalous activity as it is and is called out for such.

[@zurn56]

Doesn't matter. They will just say it's fake & throw out soem mumbo-jumbo about aspect ratios

[@rodstarcke5423]

@@zurn56, the pilot would just lose his job instantaneously.

[@user-en9zo2ol4z]

Drones do not exhibit the types of flying characteristics as attributable to these craft. They cannot possibly be drones.

[@TalkinKush]

Yeah they’re definitely drones, ALIEN DRONES

[@tomray8765]

THATS the KEY observations that differentiates real UFOS/UAPS from other possible prosaic phenomena. Instant acceleration and stops, high speed right angle turns, hovering, NO sound and a wobble motion in straight flight.

[@rickyfitness252]

Regurgitate harder

[@aubreymacleod2618]

So glad to see that I'm not alone in noticing the absolute ridiculousness of claiming that pilots with many years in the skies would mistake Jupiter for a ufo that dwarfed their plane 3 times over!! And, there does exist radar data that proves that the incident happened!! In addition, they have recordings of the verbal communication between the pilots and ground control, which demonstrates how long it went on for, how they were asked to change course, etc. The pilot was subsequently, but wrongfully, put on desk duty upon landing. Then we all ask why the incidents aren't reported?!?! There's TONS of evidence in existence for these incidents!!! But instead of looking into these occurrences, and following the path that the data leads to, people sit up upon their high horses and expect the government to spoonfeed it to them and tell them how to think!! I refuse to follow along with them as just another drooling zombie. We all have the same ability to see what's going on here, yet most refuse to look this in the eye for what it truly is. And, Sadly, that's exactly what our government officials hope and want from us. I'd prefer not to give them the satisfaction. This is all coming out soon, and government knows it. They've already shown their hand and it's inevitable. I would highly recommend that people look into these historical ufo incidents because that's where the truth lies. Don't be caught out in the cold with all of this....educate yourselves.

[@RockinRobbins13]

How much do I doubt all that juicy anecdotal evidence you provide from 37 years ago? I don't believe three words of it. But I'll double down on your last two words *educate yourselves.* Those who have are not seeing alien spacecraft. The ridiculousness of your contention that government is hiding the truth here is that smart people follow the money. What would happen to the budgets of NASA, the FAA, astronomical observatories and science in general if anyone actually had credible evidence of alien visitation. All their budgets would explode like the Hindenburg! They would paper the bathrooms with thousand dollar bills. You are saying, and you don't expect us to laugh, the the government, FAA, NASA, scientists just don't want the hassle of counting all that money. They aren't interested in being remembered for hundreds of years as the discoverers that we are not alone. Who would want that much prestige. I'm laughing at you right now. You earned it.

[@MichaelWinter-ss6lx]

I'm not sure at all if this will end good for us. The very rare statements from former real high officials let me fear the worst, because of how we treate extraterrestrial beings when we catch them. Just watch the political circus, and then tell me how sick top military leaders must also be.

[@RockinRobbins13]

@@MichaelWinter-ss6lx Not as sick as those who lie about them, or those who uncritically swallow those lies eagerly and parrot them.

[@54321tts]

Its not ridiculous at all. Do to the fact that humans sensory organs aren't adapted to flight, Pilots are very susceptible to flight related visual illusions, regardless of experience. There are a whole number of common optical/spacial illusions that can cause that, its not at all that far fethched, if you're familiar with night and instrument flight. Radar clutter is also insanely common.

[@RockinRobbins13]

@@54321tts I'll jump on that bandwagon. Pilots are so sensory challenged they don't even know which way is up! And neither do you. The first part of instrument flight training is demonstrating that your senses are out to kill you. When you have poor visibility outside the cockpit you can 100% count on collision with a large rocky planet. Only when you have the discipline to ignore your ability to know up from down and rely on your instruments will you live to see tomorrow. But Aubrey, in his infinite wisdom would die in probably less than a minute to show he knows more than a pilot.

[@joestewart6027]

Phil Class was "classless" when it came to his debunking. He would not interview witnesses and often used personal attacks in his debunking.

[@cannotfindmyshoes3]

And his music was poncey shite.

[@kms08711]

He was paid just like mickey west

[@tim1883]

@@cannotfindmyshoes3 I assume you know the music was from Phillip Glass, not Class. Different dudes, both pouncy shite's though.

[@joebenzz]

Most debunkers are like this. They pass themselves as "sherlock" type of investigators while they clearly jump to conclusions and never bother to check their facts because they are "too intelligent" to bother.

[@davidnobular9220]

Professional debunker. By "professional" I mean he's getting paid to do this.

[@vociferon-heraldofthewinte7763]

“It is never aliens” even without looking at any data - say “experts”

[@JZsBFF]

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Blurry images and dots in the night do NOT qualify as such. That's probably also why experts spend their time on cases that are more relevant to air traffic safety and national security ie Chinese balloons and UAP in lanes.

[@vociferon-heraldofthewinte7763]

@@JZsBFF Yes. Thats why experts don’t look at data that doesn’t fit their bias. Look at what happened with the Covid pandemic. “Experts” completely ignored the data.

[@seebarry4068]

Its it time for mandatory dashcams on commercial aircraft? I think it would be revealing.

[@jamesboone4343]

Saw a V shaped UFO back in the late 80’s. It was huge. Can’t go outside without looking up even now 40’s yrs later. Once you see one you’re never the same.

[@antonnym214]

UAP go through trends or cycles. In the 50s and 60s, it was discs, saucers and cigar shapes. In the 90s and early 2000s, it was the giant triangles and boomerangs, like Phoenix lights or Stephenville, Texas sighting. These were boomerang shaped craft a mile wide and a mile long. Earth technology doesn't have anything that big, and certainly nothing that will stay up at 30 miles per hour. Lately it seems to be primarily smaller Orbs, but they have been seen around airports quite a bit. That JAL 1628 looks like a good sighting. I wouldn't be quick to dismiss the RADAR return as "clutter", since you have trained eyewitnesses. Phil Klass is a professional debunker. I am very familiar with him. If he says it's raining, I'm going to go outside and look up to make sure. Jupiter doesn't fit the description of a craft that's twice the length of an aircraft carrier. Jupiter appears as a mere dot in the sky. It doesn't have a walnut shape and you can't make out any kind of equatorial feature on Jupiter with the naked eye. Yet here's Klass, who wasn't there is telling the eyewitnesses what they saw. BUT, you have to be careful, because his explanation does not fit the evidence. Q: How many UFO Debunkders does it take to change a light bulb? A: There was never a light bulb. That was swamp gas.

[@ar2vi8]

I have a theory that, of course, I can't prove. The sky is filled with UAP's, but they have cloaking capability. The only time we see them is when they have a cloaking malfunction.

[@obiwanceleri]

I'll go further. My intuition tells me some UFOs have the technology to pick and choose who can and can't see the cloaked ships. That would explain how some people are the only ones to see a UFO when there was a lot of people present. Remember, the human mind is highly unprotected.

[@yanetpapo8824]

Or they just want to be seen!

[@charlesblithfield6182]

Look up Professor Courtney Brown and his simple methods of viewing UAP using off the shelf cameras and even smartphones. He says they are everywhere and has many videos to prove it.

[@kms08711]

Happened in korea at school Ufos disguised as clouds and then turned into ball of orange lights

[@Togidubnus]

@@charlesblithfield6182 Prof. Brown was on Chris Lehto last week demonstrating this. For anyone needing proof of UFO's existence he shows how they can gather their own evidence. But we all know the game's up. ETs are *everywhere*. None of them are disguised as Jupiter, either.

[@woody5109]

As a seasoned astrophotographer I can tell you, “no one” is going to confuse any planet with a flying object of any kind, no one.

[@briangriffiths114]

Even my 87 year old parents have witnessed multiple orbs performing physics defying manoeuvres high in the night sky above Dundee, Scotland in November 2023 and I have since had my own sighting, for which I took a video clip to confirm. This is not going away any time soon.

[@Coasterr200145]

The universe is unimaginably large. It is unimaginably old compared to recorded human history. We are not the first and we are not the 'only'. I hope this truth becomes public knowledge in my lifetime!

[@Winkkin]

The estimated length of the UFO whose partial shadow was captured by the Russian Phobos probe, was over 2 kilometers long. There may be whole civilizations that spend their entire lives on a ship or fleets of ships. Habitable planets may be very rare and attract numerous beings from all around to see if they might move in or harvest resources.

[@fusion9619]

Probably the most important resource is genetic mutation. If you have a society of beings that live forever, they need genes from creatures that are still actively evolving to supplement their genes.

[@Winkkin]

@@fusion9619 Very interesting observation. Might be a tech strategy that they use as a social adaptation tool at every location they spend time.

[@fusion9619]

@@Winkkin yeah, could be. At some point, biology and technology become the same thing. And I'd bet the most valuable commodity in the universe is genetic information harvested from living planets.

[@statinskill]

​@@fusion9619Or maybe they don't need the genes from lesser species. What you're talking about, that's just some theory that's been around for how long. But really if they're that incredibly advanced, if they had to, they could just make for themselves the sorts of genes they need.

[@fusion9619]

@@statinskill you don't sound like you know much about genetics.

[@kahlrhoam6769]

Observing our ever expanding bubble of broadcast media, they’d know that we’re becoming much more aware of their presence. THX for following these topics, AA! 😐👏🛸

[@JasonRing]

So you've got me in the spirit of the UFO season and binged watched some of movie classics like... "Close Encounters of the Drone Kind (1977)", "Drone Wars Episode VI: Return of the Drones" (1983), "War of the Drones" (The Classic from 1953 and the 2005 version), "Drones in the Sky" (1993), "The Drone Incident" (1975), and "The Day the Drones Stood Still" (1951 classic and 2008 version).

[@timgolby8556]

Funny how there is very little corresponding footage of aircraft filmed from drones...

[@RockinRobbins13]

Hm-m-mmmmmmm...

[@handsomenumber1393]

When a lithium ion battery gets chewed by a jet engine, the result will be catastrophic.

[@Marcus_x_art]

Nice to hear some newer reports. Thanks AA

[@yukoncorneliusthelegendhim9751]

a lot of em are indeed drones. theyre just not from this planet is all. we're being heavily watched.

[@aerospacematt9147]

A few things I noted in your video. As an RC aircraft pilot (a “drone pilot” as defined by the FAA) I can speak to some of the hobby grade technology out there. Most fixed wing RC aircraft are flown visually (line of sight, LOS) but there are technologies out there that allow for First Person View (FPV) flying. For range, my Spektrum DX6E 6 function controller theoretically allows for 2650 feet of range, although by 1000 feet away it’s hard to tell orientation. Of course my more modern NX10 gives me altimeter readout and alerts me when approaching the 400 ft limit. The reason I bring up FPV and Transmitter range is because there are radio amplifiers out there that can significantly boost range. Back in 2013, an RC pilot attached a plane to a weather balloon which took it up to 33,000 meters or 108,000 feet. He had control up at that altitude but lost it when one of his long range wires broke off during separation. He regained control and made a safe landing a decent ways away from him. Definitely farther than 2650 feet. I noted one of the reported sightings over the power plant indicated it was observed airborne for one hour. For my fixed wing aircraft, a brick sized battery will only give me 3.5 minutes on my F/A-18C. My motor glider is much closer to attaining that mark, using the throttle only to get it up to altitude, then gliding down and repeating. 40 minutes on average. An actual “multirotor” (standard drone) such as the DJI Phantom 4 can really only get 40 minutes max because the propellers are the only thing keeping it airborne (unlike my glider or jet which can glide with the motor off.) One final observation I have is of the F-35 UAP incident you reported. You mentioned the 2 UAPs “merged”. The jet then disengaged to “avoid conflict” which raises an eyebrow. There is actually a term in military aviation called “merge” and that means that 2 or more opposing aircraft meet where they are pretty much at the same altitude and are parallel to each other going separate directions. This move is significant because it generally indicates the start of BFM (Basic Fighter Maneuvers) which in simple terms means dogfighting. So a merge is the start of a dogfight. And we know that the F-35 is superior at Beyond Visual Range but rather average at dogfighting. So it makes sense that if a UAP merges with specifically an F-35, then it makes sense that it would disengage and “bug out.” Just a few thoughts. Keep up the great work AA!

[@cosmic4037]

When you watch something bigger than a football stadium, semintranslucent, exit the water, no sound except the waves, and run off. Then continue straight up at tremendous speed, no acceleration, out of sight, no sound, no rockets, no propellers or wings, its not a drone....seen aircraft rake off from deck of a aircraft carrier.,This was a sub turning into aircraft carrier that the carrier took off.

[@christopherokeefe5734]

OMG... WHATEVER!!!! The radar data of the Japanese planes shows that humongous UFO actually doing circles around the cargo plane. At one moment it would be about 2 miles in front of them then poof it's 2 miles behind them then poof it's 2 miles beside. And at the beginning when it was pacing them it so was so close out the left side that's when the piolet decided to descend about 1500ft because he was freaking the hell out!!!!! That's an old report I think the newer ones have the real radar data .

[@vociferon-heraldofthewinte7763]

Jupiter sure gets around a lot?

[@stanleydavidson6543]

Don't believe it 😅 1987?

[@Tek-eo3li]

Funny how a drone or drone operator are never recovered. But we’re still supposed to believe they’re drones.

[@ungi9945]

Jupiter is the answer for all these debunkers

[@chadramsour3502]

I watched the Phoenix lights in 97 from b my apartment balcony. They didn't have drones and stuff like that back then. Whatever it is they're not from here, I think they're just keeping an eye on us to make sure we don't ruin everything.

[@MarineBoy42]

You were looking in the direction of Sky Harbor Airport right? Those were military aircraft flares.

[@SteveSaxtonmusic]

Nice new sunnies dude! The cylindrical object that flashed past the plane is very interesting

[@robluna7156]

Jupiter? Damn, how high up was he flying?

[@PuRaHeRiNg]

Do you mind adding a source to all the video snippets? Hope this doesn't require a lot of additional work but i belive it would help.

[@user-nc9vv5se5u]

Look Kevin Knuth SOL presentation, best ufo video, he includes the giant JAL 168 flight ufo

[@telfordguy34uk]

One thing ive never understood ; what possible use would external flashing lights serve on an extraterrestrial vehicle that was trying to hide from our view 🤔?

[@IndieChief116]

So other entities don't crash into them.

[@gwills9337]

Too smart by a half dude

[@Oldthanos]

Calling them “drones” come with the stigmatization that they are unmanned, most likely foreign adversary, or little Johnny playing with his new birthday gift. I’d just stick with Uap or UFO until a definitive conclusion is reached.

[@MichaelWinter-ss6lx]

As long as you don't need to fear loosing your job for calling the culprit by name ;•) originaly they were _Flying_ _Saucers._

[@Oldthanos]

@@MichaelWinter-ss6lx I have newspaper clippings from the early 1900s and one from 1897 calling them “flying cigars,” “airships,” and “strange lights”

[@rhysenna]

I witnessed what I'd describe as a Glass sphere just sat in the clouds over Cheshire, England, 10 years ago for about 10 seconds. I looked away to tell my brother and looked back but it had gone.

[@IndieChief116]

Could be muscae volitantes. I had it after an eye injury in the military. You see these floaters which look like things up in the sky but are actually minute particles inside your eye. There are lots of reasons why people get them, it's not just from a trauma injury to the eye. I had never heard of this phenomena and never knew about it until it happened to me. It often looked like there was glass orbs of something floating in the sky, and when you move, they can change position and can simply disappear (in my personal experience). I thought I would be blind at first, but then when I regained sight in that eye, I had these 'floaters' for weeks and months afterwards, gradually decreasing in number and incidence. For a few months I might get one, or two maybe in a day, and it trailed off until I got no more.

[@FRACTUREDVISIONmusic]

This popped up in recommendations... The sunglasses indoors indicates this is clearly a solid channel with all the newses on UFO stuffs.

[@paulbizard3493]

4:45 "With a cargo of French wine"... No wonder they saw a BIG UFO....

[@jefkaplinger2717]

I live in charleston wv, and last year there were a Bunch of sightings of a basketball sized orbs flying around the area. I got a few seconds of it on video. Its really weird.

[@michaelchapman1502]

UAS? WTF! Another new acronym? Who invented this one, you?

[@alangknowles]

UAS? No idea either. As for WTF, white-tailed fulmer?

[@platoniczombie]

Unidentified Anamolous Swarm or Unidentified Aerial Swarm

[@spinny2010]

I had to re-watch to see if I zoned out when he explained the new acronym. WTF?

[@alangknowles]

@@platoniczombie Aerial?

[@platoniczombie]

@@alangknowles 👍

[@dontclickthechannel7949]

Its all coming out

[@SamtheIrishexan]

Unfortunately we have felt that way for 75 years. I think with the proliferation of high tech cameras though it may be forced soon.

[@ShadowFear05]

Not exactly. I'm a huge UAP enthusiast and i am up to date with every major news on the topic but sincerely if everything stays still we won't have any proper disclosure. Whistleblowers are too scared to break NDAs and is stuff like these that really keep humankind from evolving. We need new public hearings with verifiable EVIDENCE!

[@keithwilcox7489]

Catastrophic Disclosure events more likely now, maybe 🤔

[@MichaelWinter-ss6lx]

@ShadowFear05, we need new public and political leaders, and a more mature attitude.

[@IndieChief116]

@@ShadowFear05 Do you mean UFOs which are vehicles, or atmospheric and meteorological phenomena? Don't use the government distraction of calling them UAPs.

[@Mr_Curious]

The flight time of a high end personal drone is fifteen to thirty minutes tops. Typical flight time of most drones is much less. What would be the point of someone flying their drone in an effort to create the impression of a UFO/UAP? Doesn't sound like much fun to me. Be kind and do good work. 🙃🦂😇🐯🦄💜

[@RockinRobbins13]

And be honest after doing legitimate research.

[@ultrafly4994]

good shit, here to support and spread your content I feel like your a voice we need, I appreciate your uap/ufo content with a skeptical mind, but I truly love your space, astronomical, rocket, new tech content I'm here to help

[@mistro0014]

Aliens have drones too

[@Aloh-od3ef]

The photo at the beginning is clearly a Boeing tire! 😂

[@notozknows]

This is crazy, in NYC, too.

[@zapdosmtr4961]

Thank you for sane commentary about this ufo and the topic in general. Some YTers take this aliens videos too far like the mall incident and alien the backyard video.

[@sheiladavis2304]

The drone has become the new weather balloon or balloon in general. Its used as a catch all debunker no matter how rediculous it sounds. The general public has no idea how a drone works or its limits. They called the swarm over navy ships even though there were no ships in the area that could have been used as a launch site. Drones run on batteries and have a short flight duration as the motors are so hungry for power. That and the fact that drones arent aerodynamic at all. Fpv drones have a 5 to 10 minute flight time maximum and camera drones arent much better at around 20 min. So if you are out at sea you need a boat to be taking off from or you wont even make it there let alone hover over the target for any time. Even the big drones for filming movies or crop dusting have the same run times they are just scaled up in size(bigger drone bigger battery same flight time) any long flight drone has a plane body like a uav or ucav that is the only way to extend flight time and distance and they dont hover. Angry, as part of ufo/uap week could you look into Christopher Melons substack. He reports on and releases correspondence he has with a former high up in the military on a famous case from the 50's of a crash retrieval. I believe it was from when he was trying to get info on Roswell for Clinton. It starts out with him asking about Roswell but that name is redacted and they continue to go on about the case . It shows that this is anything but a "new" phenomenon. Also check out Richard Dolans youtube channel for an in depth explanation of the case at hand. He put in many years tracking information on this case as well as another uap investigator. It was an incredible event. It was an episode he did two days ago entitled "Did Chris Melon just confirm UAP retrievals?" Thanks AA

[@AgadorSpartacus100]

Excellent programme! Thank you

[@osuraoso]

I really like your perspective, thank you!

[@Ben_the_Ignorant]

Search answers where you have not searched yet, and search where you always thought that would be impossible. That's a personal work.

[@UFO-Ark]

I remember seeing an interview with an American military sailer talking about a craft 2x larger than an aircraft carrier coming up out of the ocean an hovering over the military ship he was onboard.

[@asanablue]

Like your handle. Good show. 🛸

[@jamesmartinez991]

Keep the new shades coming!

[@jvarga2]

Thanks!

[@TheAngryAstronaut]

Thanks so much for your generous support!!

[@MrClydie_Po_Po]

RIGHT NOW!!!!! Excellent!

[@antonnym214]

Peter Davenport at the National UFO Reporting Center (NUFORC) advises he gets 400 reported sightings a day from all over the world. That's REPORTED. That's the tip of the iceburg, which means these things are ubiquitous. The video of the metallic orbs is compelling because they are daylight observations with specular reflection and often shadow. Nice reporting.

[@allen480]

Peter Davenport is a national treasure. He is brilliant and one heck of a nice guy.

[@donaldopie1006]

Still waiting to hear about the EXACT DETAILS. Of the Alaskan “ ballon “ that was shot down my military craft - AMAZING COMPLETE SILENCE ON THIS RECENT “ balloon “ which it was not recover exercise --

[@paulelliott7493]

Here's the thing, they are using "likely a drone" as a explanation now......but what about all those many years before drones came along?...what then?

[@johnramirez5032]

Its people who dont or cant fathom the reality. Thats why Disclosure hasnt worked.

[@johnramirez5032]

Why doesnt some one use a drone with video capabilities to film a ufo. Does the opperating system take out t filming capabilities?

[@johnramirez5032]

So if people believe there are others here what then?

[@paulelliott7493]

@@johnramirez5032 people can believe that if they please, All i know is if they were here, and it came out to the public it would be the biggest story we ever experience first hand.

[@MarcGoudreau]

I've always been curious about the number of alien entities visiting or "just passing through" our solar system and I'm convinced that any civilization capable of interstellar (interdimensional ?) flight (transposition) has obviously overcome the same emotional immaturity that keeps humanity at each other's' throats. Non contact (observation) seems to be the norm rather than the exception so science and research would be a good guess driving the motivation for ALL interstellar exploration. Given our bloody and violent past on Earth and the nuclear umbrella under us in the 21st century, I wonder how many civilizations in this vast universe didn't make it out of the starting gate (solar system) !!!

[@StalkedByLosers]

That picture shown out the plane window... it's just a Boeing piece of plane falling off 😂😂😂😂

[@Ronsilk-pu5hr]

Nuclear plants security should have there own drones that they can send up at a moments notice to investigate the unotherized drones

[@robertallen7513]

What the fuck is UAS, I'm sick and tired of the changing names. UFO, UFO, UFO, UFO YOU GUYS ARE SCREWED UP.

[@timk5867]

Calm down chief

[@jselectronics8215]

I want to see the little green men!

[@RockinRobbins13]

@@jselectronics8215 When you can't dazzle them with brilliance, just baffle them with bullschnitzel. People are too stupid to know the difference.

[@cannotfindmyshoes3]

​@@jselectronics8215.. Take some magic mushrooms then. You're not likely to see GREEN men in Spacecraft.

[@platoniczombie]

Unidentified Airel (or Anamolous) Swarm

[@Violence0vAction]

Wild… Thx

[@papac6831]

"When you have eliminated all which is impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth". Arthur Conan Doyle but i say "shit happends"

[@RockinRobbins13]

It is impossible that an _"epidemic!!!"_ of UAP sightings would result in AA having to reach back 37 years for a credible example. What remains is that we have no visitors from alien civilization. Which sucks because I made them lunch.

[@papac6831]

@@RockinRobbins13 buddy we are lunch and the Aliens are the Farmers 🙂Humans lovely with a bit of mint sauce !.

[@RockinRobbins13]

@@papac6831 That is possible but there's no evidence that it's true.

[@papac6831]

@@RockinRobbins13 that's what they want us to think 😀

[@kaybolt1490]

Angry Couch Potato here. Take sunspecs off! You're indoors mate.

[@adamwiseman5831]

I have this bucket of sand with seagulls and drones to stick your head in so you dont have to be too scared! 😂😂😂😂 This shit just keeps getting better. I'm rotting this on and loving it! I've waited 27 years for this. The other classic was when they flew by the presidents plane like 2 days after saying its just seagulls you believe us right. Oh my lord😅😅

[@mikeharrington5593]

A large flattish round craft with donut-shaped edges can appear cigar-like when viewed from its side. I have seen from about 5 miles away, in the 1960s, one such aircraft-sized cigar-like object moving slowly & then disappearing. If you believe round craft fly in a flattish trajectory, then most might appear from side-on to be cigar-like. This does not explain the reports of cylindrical/TicTac objects.

[@mikeharrington5593]

I can understand the Jupiter explanation for the giant UFO, on the basis that I have seen the Moon in unusual/freakish atmospheric conditions when I was driving up to a hilltop. It appeared to be a hundred times larger & clearer than usual, but in driving further downhill its size visually shrunk to normal size. It was a bad narrow place to stop & take a photo, but it is an amazing memory.

[@virtualee2000]

Ryan Graves saw UAP operating in military airspace every day he flew. If they are drones, they are not human.

[@slamhead]

As someone who had a close clear day observation of a craft does not get excited about these type of sightings. Drones? Perhaps, but they are ours. Why is the word drone being thrown out all the time? Because governments plan on outlawing consumer drones as the use of low cost drones as weapons or carriers of contraban is scary the hell out of those in power.

[@XAirForce]

I processed that same video myself on my iPad and looked at it over and over again. I am by no means an expert because I did communications in the Air Force but the little bit I think I know leads me to believe that is not a drone. I asked ChatGTP how fast it might be with four frames visible at 30 frames a second. This was just a complete gas, but I gave it 2000 feet and that would’ve been 10,000 miles an hour. So even if we only saw fly 200 feet that would still be 1000 miles an hour if this is even vaguely close. I thought it might be going about 400 miles an hour when I looked and that was based off the plane, probably traveling a couple hundred miles an hour. The fastest drone that I know someone has said they’ve flown on KZbin was a FPV drone doing around 250 miles an hour. there’s no way one of those drones would make it up to altitude at that speed and battery for more than couple minutes and this is faster than that for sure. The other thing was is it’s trajectory didn’t make any sense based on how aircraft normally fly. You didn’t see any sort of outlet out the back so it appeared to be driven from the center, but it wasn’t tilted at the right angle to have that kind of speed.. i’ve had my own strange experience with something that was floating around me, but I couldn’t see it. Basically an apparition. Multiple energy devices were being used against me when I was running for president in 2020 and this was one of the things I experienced. Most of them were over a month and I took readings the best I could. It points directly to the United States having direct energy devices, and they used them against other government officials during a federal election. That is absolutely dangerous to the American public. I am a retired computer and RF technician and so I had to have radiation hazard training where we learned to avoid anything out of the normal because we were around a bunch of dangerous electronics like aircraft radar. In other words, I was trained by the government officially to use all of my senses to detect something dangerous. I am 90% sure the United States government knows how to use energy in ways that they have never admitted to the public. They did what seemed like an operation which meant they had to go through multiple services my skin and vital organs and then a beam that seem to be cutting a 1 mm bite out of my upper colon. It felt like they were removing a tumor over two weeks, 21 hours a day. Then they were able to hurt me with something that had enough power that it would cause your leg to buckle. Walking down the steps and they could hit you with this beam and cause you to fall and there would be no indication of how you fell. Somehow, they were able to use that while I was driving down the interstate and there were no vehicles around as I was passing between hills, so there were no towers either. They had a very low that would be underneath all the time and would follow me out side when I was smoking. It didn’t bother me, but it was strong enough that I could feel it underneath my feet. The apparition could wrap itself around my hands individually, and when I measured it with an IR thermometer, it was 5° colder than the surrounding surfaces.

[@unitedtechnocrat1747]

First also I can't wait to go hang out with them

[@BoltRM]

Go for a ride!! 🛸

[@sburns2421]

Hang out, like field dressed? ;) kzbin.info/www/bejne/kKHCdpugobF6obM

[@SamtheIrishexan]

Be careful what you wish for lol

[@jasonviberg9807]

I don’t think there is any increase in UFO/UAP activity but a societal change in the attitude towards them. This change in attitude from one of ridicule and denial to that of acceptance and curiosity was one of the main goals of TTSA. This group has disbanded but former members Lou Elizondo, Chris Mellon along with credible witnesses/whistleblowers like Ryan Graves, David Fraver and David Grusch are paving the path. The JAL 1628 pilot(s) were disciplined for reporting the incident to the media. This denial and ridicule is a result of 70+ years of military/IC monkey business. The FAA is part of this disinformation campaign. I wouldn’t trust anything FAA says or any other government agency states. There’s an official order of denial within the armed forces and which I presume applies to the FAA as well which is official denial of UAP. This act is from 1947 or 48.

[@jamescarter8311]

Exactly like the UFO Captured Over Italy in 1979 By Giancarlo Cecconi. Even has the "glass" bubble.

[@jaroslavpesek6642]

Interesting is, how people that explain what it was are called skeptics. It is the other way around. Those that don't believe normal explanation are skeptics.

[@RockinRobbins13]

What is your conception of "normal explanation?" Making up stories of little green men?

[@SamtheIrishexan]

18:18 that one looks like a deamon and freaks me out. Like a squid man in armor

[@flapdrol]

Don't worry, it's just a balloon they use in Iraq at celebrations of Eid-al-fitr.

[@walterlyzohub8112]

Some of those videos looked like a spinning cube right out of the Star Trek the original series called “The Corbomite Maneuver” but not fully in focus.

[@sburns2421]

I would discount any UAP reported below a certain deck, say 10,000 ft. Most likely drones without extraordinary hi-def footage to refute it. However, the higher in the atmosphere and the faster it is verified to move, commercial drones are not a possibility.

[@kymvalleygardensdesign5350]

The thing is this stuff was flying way before drones were even thought of, and they don't fly so fast that you can hardly see them either.

[@cannotfindmyshoes3]

You would discount stuff out of hand even though you hadn't even seen it.

[@sburns2421]

@@cannotfindmyshoes3 Like I said, unless there was better evidence than just "I saw it" for low flying...yes most likely.

[@RickL_was_here]

Lol. That screen shot at the beginning perfectly resembles a drone...

[@batmandeltaforce]

The FAA just needs to tell the military aero-contractors contractors to go home. It is mostly local traffic.

[@netdragon256]

I've been on one that large so I don't imagine they're too abnormal. It was about the width of a couple mountains in a small mountain range and had a short cylindrical shape

[@contestvoter]

If no enforcement activities can be taken and no laws are broken, why would LE be contacted?

[@davidhernandez9985]

Top of a Saturday, Jordan. You should give a holler to UFO monitor Jeremy Corbell. And about your show about alien propulsion wouldn't cool if NASA came up with a propulsion to get us much faster to the moon to the red planet Mars. May you have a fantastic-weekend sir,🫡!

[@gilbertdavis3084]

Hello Mr angry. I'm a retired airline pilot and witnessed the kecksburg UFO back in 1965. That UFO was flying not just shooting thru the atmosphere.i have questions about it's flightpath??

[@owendurant7873]

As a pilot, you are expected to be able to identity (for the most part) anything anomalous in the sky. Bird, drone, kite... whatever it is, you should be able to relay to ground contol what it is. Its never a good look to say "I saw something while flying, but i have no clue what it was". It makes the pilot appear incompetent. Its also a flight saftey risk to have objects in the sky that are unclassified.

[@codysearchfield8258]

Is he saying UAS? What does that mean? Edit: Googled it and I think he means unmanned aircraft system. When did we change the acronym away from UAV (unmanned aerial vehicle)?

[@DavidKnowles0]

It been in the news, so a increase in sightings and reporting is expected.

[@dmeemd7787]

That one from the other other day was really interesting, I don’t think anyone was taking anything there and I think they just wanna know what the heck it was.. I honestly feel for people that try to genuinely get information and go to the right channel and anyway we all know how that goes. When people are genuinely trying to find out what’s going on, they get kicked in with people that are faking shit and everything else.

[@paulhyland7456]

The Laguardia footage is either 1) A Spaceship that has traversed the galaxy, or 2) A drone. It's a drone.

[@robertthomas9564]

looks like a Starship viewed from the side where the flaps would be perpendicular with the ship and not easy to see.

[@palrevesz8629]

The object the mother filmed is not cylindrical. It is more of a TR3B type of craft-- Triangular looking from the top or bottom view. The reflection spot on the filmed object is probably one of the 3 corners. Nice Job 👍

[@PeckerwoodIndustries]

Alien craft can now disguise themselves as commercial, and military drones. LOL

[@susanmather]

UAS???😮😮

[@2painful2watch]

Unmanned aircraft system. It basically means the people in the controls of these drones where ever they are.

[@denp28]

Re: Virgin Galactic - One carrier ship for as many as five spaceships sounds high risk. VMS Eve will have to work flawlessly for the foreseeable future with no concrete plans in effect to grow the mothership line.

[@reggiebannister4098]

It's tipped down like a drone would be

[@tim1883]

There is a lot more to the story in Alaska from the 80's. If you don't like UFO websites, read Leslie Keens first book, or watch "I know what I Saw".

[@JamesKonzek-xr5zy]

This is an outrage!