the Monty Hall problem does not address the fact that if you are on the television shoe you only play the game one time. In the bar game you have to play many times to get the advantage of switching.
@SpencerMillayArtist Жыл бұрын
How is the second one a paradox. There is no preference, it is simply a tie. There is no repeat of any candidate in the first, second, or even third column. 3 voters voting for 3 candidates, which means it does not matter what candidate is more preferred against one other candidate if you were voting for just those two against each other. It is a vote for 3 candidates between 3 voters and it just so happened that nobody agreed on a first, second, or third candidate. It would simply be a tie. End of story. No need to complicate things that don’t need to be complicated. In a normal society somebody is bound to agree, there are more than 3 voters, and there are even more than 3 candidates. So, this would NEVER EVEN HAPPEN in todays world. This could also happen with 4 and 4 and many other numbers.
@Continential2 ай бұрын
But it could happen. Consider these preferences are given and then one of the choices drops out of the race. Then the preferences no longer tie when considering the last 2 choices. This shows setting the vote up in a certain way and choosing who drops out can determine who wins, even if initially it is a tie.