An interesting problem I got recently on the FE Environmental is called a 3 point problem where they have you solve for the hydraulic conductivity. I was having trouble determining the hydraulic gradient. It seems the length between wells has to be determined with the equipotential lines. Maybe the distance between.Might be a good video to put together
@directhubfeexam Жыл бұрын
Hi Kevin! Did you check out this problem? kzbin.info/www/bejne/iajck2xsZdKpqsk It’s the same process. They’d have to give you the distances between wells to find the hydraulic conductivity
@ni54392 ай бұрын
If the aquifer doesn't have an uniform thickness, how do you calculate the area? Do you use an average thickness from different measurements along the aquifer?
@pinkie2243 жыл бұрын
is there any significance to the problem stating that the soil profile is homogeneous and isotropic?
@directhubfeexam3 жыл бұрын
Hi David, good question. This simply means the hydraulic conductivity value will be constant for the whole aquifer profile (homogeneous) AND the hydraulic conductivity will be constant in all directions (x,y,z) - (isotopic).
@joseh76126 ай бұрын
What's the difference between Darcy's law and transmissivity?
@btalib3693 жыл бұрын
Why we used Darcy low???
@tessngochi35583 жыл бұрын
I am also confused as to why we didn’t use Dupuit's Formula from the handbook
@nelsonhuezo53852 жыл бұрын
You don't have the data for the pumping wells.
@ricardoarturolaraperaza99882 жыл бұрын
@@nelsonhuezo5385 exactly.
@carankatemanalo37252 жыл бұрын
where is this equation in the FE handbook?
@directhubfeexam2 жыл бұрын
Darcy's Law - pg. 291 FE Handbook 10.1
@happyluv63 жыл бұрын
what happened to the negative in the equation?
@ricardoarturolaraperaza99882 жыл бұрын
The negative is because Dh is actually 41m-76. Remember the water always flow from higher ground to lower. So. the difference should be actually h2 - h1 therefore dh= -35m