There's something about a flintlock that's just so satisfying to hear fire.
@ernestclements73985 жыл бұрын
Indeed! Click clack and boom! And an the smell of sulphur!
@EvgeneXI3 жыл бұрын
Especially when there’s several hundred firing at once.
@steeltalon23569 жыл бұрын
Black powder in slow-motion just can't be beat. So much going on.
@j0nthegreat9 жыл бұрын
Steel Talon that you can't see because of all the smoke! :)
@albanfisher68573 жыл бұрын
Wheellocks in slow motion!!
@RK-ej1to3 жыл бұрын
I disagree, big ol titties bouncing in slow motion takes the win.
@SStupendous2 жыл бұрын
@@albanfisher6857 That's still blackpowder... 🤦♂
@tonyktx449 жыл бұрын
When I was a lad ,(many moons ago) I read a book by the wonderful writer Louis L'amour called "The Ferguson Rifle" and have always wanted to see how the action worked. Today I cross one off my bucket list, thanks Ian... P.S. I still re read my old paperback L.L.s to this day.
@alsaunders78054 жыл бұрын
Excellent book ,
@Carterofmars3 жыл бұрын
I'm re reading Read Louis L'Amour's 'The Ferguson Rifle' right now. Outstanding. His attention to history in his writing is amazing. In the story the main character compares the open plains of the USA with what the scynthian nomads of Eurasia must have encountered 2000 years ago in their similar grasslands that stretch from Mongolia all the way to Romania in Europe. That led me to reading about Scythian culture. That is the power of L'Amour's writing.
@floydvaughn8363 жыл бұрын
@@Carterofmars Check out The Walking Drum.
@epauletshark37933 жыл бұрын
Louis L'Amour was an amazing author.
@Daddy537512 жыл бұрын
L.L. Never goes out of style! Quality and historical accuracy are second to none. My grandfather turned me onto his work, and I’m turning my grandsons onto him!
@ShareTheLightTV9 жыл бұрын
There's something fascinating about failed, or unadopted weapon systems. I wonder what current weapons will be considered "forgotten" in a few hundred years. Great video! :)
@DFX2KX9 жыл бұрын
Gun Runnerz I agree with you there. Interesting to see why they failed, and you'll get some that where actually quite nice for their time, but circumstances stopped them from being popular.
@ShareTheLightTV9 жыл бұрын
DFX2KX just like this design. It seems quite effective although it didn't make it.
@elgostine9 жыл бұрын
Gun Runnerz in a local shop in the centr of the city of sydney, that also sells swords the owner has for sale and display. a edo period antique japanese matchlock musket AND a M1819 hall breachloading rifle en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M1819_Hall_rifle i didnt know the hall existed however the hall had issues with fouling and gass leakage like the fergeson rifle and didnt catch on much
@TheStig5059 жыл бұрын
Gun Runnerz Taurus Curve
@nickgalbraith66089 жыл бұрын
Gun Runnerz Remington ACR.
@warywolfen8 жыл бұрын
Here's a bit of trivia. If it hadn't been for Capt. Ferguson's sense of honor, we might have lost our war for independence! Ferguson built a sniper rifle. I don't know if it was this design, but it did have a telescopic sight attached. He decided to take it out and test it, and encountered an officer of the Continental Army, on horseback. He took aim, then decided not to shoot. He decided it was dishonorable for an officer of one army to kill one of another, even if they were enemies. It was later learned that that officer was Gen. George Washington, whose skills and leadership were instrumental in our winning the war. This info came from an old copy of "Gun Digest."
@ReonMagnum8 жыл бұрын
Its real unfortunate that the wounded Ferguson did not receive any mercy during the Battle of King's Mountain, when he himself spared one of the 13 colonies most valued leaders. He went down fighting till the bitter end.
@craigsawicky16437 жыл бұрын
One needs to remember the British idea of what constituted "Gentlemanly Behavior" occasionally caused problems for the British Forces through at least WWII.
@albatross83617 жыл бұрын
googling 'Patrick Ferguson' should give you some interesting hits, including this: www.silverwhistle.co.uk/lobsters/ferguson.html the incident seems to have occurred during Brandywine, prior to Ferguson being wounded.
@tommyblackwell37605 жыл бұрын
@@ReonMagnum It was sort of his own fault....he might have been granted quarter if he hadn't threatened to take his army over the mountains and lay waste to their homes with fire and sword unless they rallied to the king. People up in those mountains were then, as they are to this day, only too ready to take up such a challenge.
@ridgerunner57725 жыл бұрын
@@tommyblackwell3760, so true!! Ferguson picked a fight and, he GOT IT..... Blowing that silver whistle to rally the Tories only attracted the sharp eyes of the Over the Mountain People........
@mattorama8 жыл бұрын
That's so cool how you can see the rifling marks on the projectile.
@Ammo085 жыл бұрын
Some of my ancestors fought Major Ferguson at King's Mountain. He was actually a well respected British officer...
@RichterBelmont2235 Жыл бұрын
By his own men, by his enemy or both?
@Ammo08 Жыл бұрын
@@RichterBelmont2235 Both...
@kevinoliver30839 ай бұрын
The Patriots respected Ferguson so much that they desecrated his corpse after the Battle of King's Mountain.
@thelegate86367 ай бұрын
@@Ammo08 Certainly not both. My ancestors were there fighting him at King's Mountain too and they would have massacred every man on that hill had their officers not stopped them.
@tclark09279 жыл бұрын
I had the privilege to be at the anniversary of the Battle of Kings Mountain a couple of years ago and attended a demonstration of the Ferguson Rifle. The stated rate of fire was 7 aimed shots per minute. One factor that was also mentioned that due to the ease of loading, a soldier could reload while walking which would be much more difficult if one had to deal with a ram rod.
@AtholAnderson9 жыл бұрын
Thank you Ian (and Mike), for bringing out a Ferguson. I've been fascinated by the rifle for a long time, but this is the first good video I've seen of one being loaded and fired. Keep up the great work.
@VexShiza2 жыл бұрын
I always appreciate it when you involve the owners. I know you would think that is standard practice but, in this day and age, giving someone credit is lacking in this world. It is nice to see you providing ALL the information at your disposal; including who owns it now.
@Daddy537512 жыл бұрын
Absolutely! Being able to watch the folks that are seriously proficient and intimately familiar with the weapons system (Which would absolutely be the case with the people who relied on them) is a real bonus for us to be able to get a real idea how they would be operated in the field.
@illegalrestricted6 жыл бұрын
Even if you don't like guns these videos are fascinating from an engineering and historical perspective
@robertordewald86783 жыл бұрын
I've just started reading loius l'amour's book for likely the 7th time, I tend to reread the really good ones every 10 years or so. When I first started as a young man I could find no information on this rifle. You have satisfied that 10 year olds interest 50 some years later, thank you.
@tomhorn18769 жыл бұрын
Reading about the Ferguson 40 years ago in an issue of Gun Digest is partially what made me the gun nut I am today. Thank you for the review and test!
@samrussell40659 жыл бұрын
British Army, not 'Royal Army': they rebelled against the King during the Civil War (yes, we had a Civil War as well).
@ragimundvonwallat89618 жыл бұрын
+Sam Russell officialy still the royal army
@samrussell40658 жыл бұрын
Royal Air Force, Royal Navy, British Army.
@KameSama777 жыл бұрын
Technically didn't you have 2? the Interregnum and War of the Roses.
@xander10527 жыл бұрын
technically no, the English civil war was in 2 or 3 parts, but they were the same civil war, parliamentarians vs royalists.
@alecblunden86156 жыл бұрын
Regiments were raised by the person who became the colonel. The Eng!ish army on restoration of Charles II was based on the Regiments of horse and foot of the Parliamentary regiments so not a standing army which rebelled, but the successors of the regiments raised by the rebels. The British Army - it has never been the "Royal" army resulted from the 1707 Act of Union between the Kingdom's of England and Scotland. There is a standing army only while Parliament votes supply each year. The army consists of separate corps - the regiments and things like the Royal Artillery etc.
@BadlanderOutsider9 жыл бұрын
Fantastic video! One small point and it's probably a slip of the tongue more than anything, but it's not the British Royal Army, it's the British Army as its formation was under Parliament during the English Civil War. So while regiments within the British Army may be Royal and officers and soldiers swear allegiance to the Monarch, the Army itself is not Royal (unlike the navy which was formed by the Crown during the reign of Henry VIII and the Royal Air Force which takes it's name from the two units it was formed from, the Royal Flying Corp and the Royal Navy Air Service). Just a little pedantry that doesn't detract from the quality of the video.
@MadraktheRed9 жыл бұрын
BadlanderOutsider Was just about to comment a similar thing.. always used to make jokes about them being on the wrong side of the civil war
@KaiCalimatinus9 жыл бұрын
I made a similar slightly less accurate comment as well, before reading down further
@XH19276 жыл бұрын
There was a Royal Flying Corporation? I wonder how that business entity worked.
@MrDgwphotos6 жыл бұрын
@XH1927 No different than the United States Marine Corporation. ;-)
@rockywr5 жыл бұрын
Actually it's the Royal Naval Air Service to be pendantic a bit more.
@Gunsbeerfreedom879 жыл бұрын
I have to stop watching this channel, every time Ian shows off a gun I find a new need for my collection, one that I didn't even know existed before hand.
@MisdirectedSasha9 жыл бұрын
Nitpick: The British Army was not the "Royal" Army. Individual units could earn the "Royal" title, but the service itself did not have it.
@edl6174 жыл бұрын
His majesties army
@t.k.bertram30769 жыл бұрын
I remember reading about this rifle in an issue of Guns and Ammo in the 70s. Ever since then I have always wanted to fire one. . Thanks for posting this!
@spacewater74 жыл бұрын
Love the slow motion footage. Thanks Mike for sharing this with us! Awesome to see the ingenuity of a fellow Scotsman shared with the world.
@djolley614 жыл бұрын
Holy freak that's a big entry wound. What a distinctive sound.
@acsone3546 Жыл бұрын
That impact is terrifying
@pnwTaco4 жыл бұрын
I love this channel. The guest was exactly the type of person I would expect to own/operate this antique rifle. Keep it up.
@itsconnorstime7 жыл бұрын
Not a single comment about this being the best rifle in the western game GUN.
@isiahrodriguez647 жыл бұрын
itsconnorstime Hey I'm not the only ome who remembered that
@dragan23246 жыл бұрын
Yeah! That's what I came here for. I was replaying that game the other day and thinking "how the hell can you reload a single shot rifle this fast? I don't think it's a trapdoor rifle or something, and it's not break action, what is it?" I guess the speedy reload part is somewhat accurate, except for that Colton reloads about 3-6 times faster than anybody else in history with this thing. The Nock gun also reloads at least 100 times faster than in real life, but take it all with a grain of salt I suppose, ey? Or a grain of powder, maybe.
@Mike-xp8zc6 жыл бұрын
It's the reason I'm here now😂
@copee34 жыл бұрын
I'm from the mountains of North Carolina. I remember growing up hearing old timers tell stories about Patrick Ferguson and his role in the revolution. Their stories, passed down through the generations, made him out to be a ruthless and bloodthirsty psychopath that ran a terror campaign against mountain folk, especially against the local Waldensian religious community. I'm certain that their stories were exaggerated (a lot) but still I think it's worth noting that Ferguson had so much of an impact on my home state that many people still curse his name almost 250 years later.
@MrSIXGUNZ9 жыл бұрын
so nice of him to share with us all !!! Blessings.
@murphysmuskets9 жыл бұрын
An awesome rifle that you rarely see, thanks for sharing!
@isiahrodriguez647 жыл бұрын
there was an old western game called GUN and this was the strongest rifle to unlock, always wondered if it was a real weapon or made up. You always deliver Ian
@mtslyh9 жыл бұрын
Definitely a big thanks to the owner of that rifle for showing it to us and letting you actually shoot it. Very interesting design!
@pcox86007 жыл бұрын
Ian, thank you for posting this video. I remember visiting Kings Mountain as a kid in the late 90s and am happy to finally see a video of one of these rifles being fired even if it is a replica. Thank you for the work that you do.
@HansChristian19 жыл бұрын
It is a fascinating story. I am a philosopher (M.A in philosophy and the history of ideas, from the University of Bergen, Norway) and something that has allways interested me is all those people who could have made such a difference, but did not get the chance.
@hkhjg17349 жыл бұрын
This needs to be banned, the founders would've never imagined that a gun could be fired from prone and shoot 6 shots in a minute.
@MrBioniclefan19 жыл бұрын
Harrison D No dude that is wrong to do
@MrBioniclefan19 жыл бұрын
BigMek456 LOL it is such a dumb idea of him to come up with
@mattyboy35765 жыл бұрын
It was a joke
@philosopher1a5 жыл бұрын
LOL
@mangalores-x_x4 жыл бұрын
no, your founders imagined that all male citizens would be part of a national militia system to organize national defense so the state could not abuse a professional military for its own ends... oh dear. Can anyone tell me why Americans only read half of their 2nd amendment all the time? The militia part was an important aspect in Supreme Court ruling up into the 1980s, I believe, e.g. justifying regulation on guns unfit for militia duty.
@SigmarJuffe9 жыл бұрын
Flintlock guns are my favorite.
@munkSWE889 жыл бұрын
Juffe Adam ?
@PhiOpsAurelio9 жыл бұрын
... and answers!
@jonaspete9 жыл бұрын
+Juffe wtf adam. you into these kind of stuff too?!
@jackhacker57387 жыл бұрын
Wheellock, Wheellock guns are the best!
@FrauIndian3 жыл бұрын
A work of art for sure.
@tankepsilon6 жыл бұрын
Who else is here after watching the video of the number 2 gun?
@blakelowrey96206 жыл бұрын
tankepsilon same
@Thunderous1176 жыл бұрын
Watched back in the day but figured I'd come back from the new video
@marshrag6 жыл бұрын
DITO...….same here.
@77gravity5 жыл бұрын
Nope, watched the video on the wheel-lock, someone asked about the Ferguson, google gave me this video.
@wmwm21944 жыл бұрын
Durs egg or Patrick? I'm confused now!
@AlexKS19928 жыл бұрын
Anybody ever read The Ferguson Rifle by Louis L'Amour. It's an awesome book.
@AlexKS19927 жыл бұрын
What did you think of the book?
@txgunguy27667 жыл бұрын
I just finished reading it last night. Ronan Chantry could fire his Ferguson "eight times to the minute".
@grendelgrendelsson54936 жыл бұрын
The copy I have has a front cover with a cowboy holding a lever action rifle on it!
@richpeters47055 жыл бұрын
Had to watch the vid because of the book.
@Ripu25 жыл бұрын
A gift from Patrick himself.
@alessioyautja6129 жыл бұрын
Thanks to Mike, Ian and the ballistics expert who came together to produce this video. Its a very interesting breech loader and I've never seen anything quite like it.
@johneschbach22117 жыл бұрын
Hard to believe by the very late 1400s that this gun was technologically possible. Very impressive.
@Boredout4549 жыл бұрын
Its funny, after seeing all the damage caused by large lead mini balls or just lead balls Id rather get hit with a modern 5.56, 7.62x39 or 7.62x51 round. Those large soft lead balls are just frightening.
@anter1769 жыл бұрын
Boredout454 you'd not be saying that if they'd shot one of those for comparison, the .65 cal might be heavier but all those are incomparably faster and create much larger cavities, much larger.
@Boredout4549 жыл бұрын
Well ive seen the comparison and I was in the military for 6 years. the big difference between our rounds of today and the rounds they did use is the mushrooming effect that soft lead does when hitting a human target. In the military we arent allowed to use hallow point, Full Metal Jacket only and more often then not goes straight thru a man. While both are nasty if I get shot in the leg or arm and it hits bone usually it creates a relatively clean entrance and exit (although severe). The ones ive seen of bodies of those hit with lead ball and mini ball show shattering and almost total obliteration.
@graidstinHitlerRants9 жыл бұрын
***** Most of those limbs were lost to infection due to the medical practices of the days
@Kamikaze-Rat9 жыл бұрын
graidstinHitlerRants In the Civil War at least, many amputations were from shattered bones and/or joints. They were very quick to remove a limb to save a life. A bullet that hit bone often caused splinters which would almost always cause gangrene if not properly removed. Now infection from THAT surgery was probably still a gamble, but at least they had a fighting chance.
@graidstinHitlerRants9 жыл бұрын
anmesm58527 That makes sense. I must admit, those Minie balls could be pretty nasty. Though I know many legs were lost to gangrene as well
@IvanIvanoIvanovich2 жыл бұрын
Not to nitpick on an old video, but 18th Century soldiers were trained to and did occasionally fire muzzleloaders prone or laying on their backs. "Laying upon arms" could be an effective foil to enemy fire, particularly on sloping or uneven terrain.
@jjkroll329 жыл бұрын
Making some great connections. Fantastic video to start the week!
@grizzlycountry10302 жыл бұрын
Kept hearing about this in some stories and was glad to find a example.
@terifarley47704 жыл бұрын
The flintlock rifle is still the coolest type ever in the history of all firearms.
@frankdantuono25949 жыл бұрын
YES!!! The Ferguson was (I believe) the first breech loading rifle that did not have the problem of gas escaping from the breech lock. Good video, but I would have liked to see some long range and/or rapid fire shooting.
@Tripp4267 жыл бұрын
Wow. This really makes me appreciate cartridge guns of today. So much less time consuming to load, so much easier to clean.
@Daddy537512 жыл бұрын
It would have been great to see a multi round “combat drill” done by an experienced user, to get a feel of how well and fast it would have been on the field.
@texasbeast2392 жыл бұрын
I believe this is the drill that Ian mentioned. kzbin.info/www/bejne/gGOmd3mhnJKSi6s
@Daddy537512 жыл бұрын
@@texasbeast239 that was great! I can see how this would have been stunning compared to the other rifles of the time.
@texasbeast2392 жыл бұрын
@@Daddy53751 Yep, especially if you never saw the Brits shooting at you because they were hidden down in the grass, and all you ever could see was the flash and smoke. 😳
@Daddy537512 жыл бұрын
@@texasbeast239 fortunately for us the Brit’s were stuck with the Brown Bess, and old style formation fighting for the most part. (Which the British were masters of) I think where we really shined was our guerrilla tactics learned from hunting, and asymmetrical warfare learned from the Indian tribes, along with the far superior Kentucky style rifles. IMO, our biggest struggles came from trying to fight them on their terms, in their style of warfare. Sorry about the essay, I just really love Revolutionary War history. 😃
@U2WB4 жыл бұрын
I’ve been reading Louis L’Amour’s book called The Fergusen Rifle, and knowing how much of his literature is fact-based, I decided to learn more about it. Amazing history !
@kenneth98742 жыл бұрын
Great book
@RainingCord9228 жыл бұрын
The book, The Ferguson Rifle is an amazing book, I love it
@Tacklebox30006 жыл бұрын
I really enjoy going back and watching the older videos, they have a much more raw feel that most of the auction vids lack. Inrange still has it though.
@RobertoDonatti9 жыл бұрын
Your vids just keep getting better and better!
@cletusallretus18 жыл бұрын
Thanks, have heard a lot about these rifles but never saw one. The vid was a real treat
@kuangsheng38919 жыл бұрын
Love the high-speed. Wonderful footage.
@Mikethemerciless11Ай бұрын
This is awesome. I've recently heard of this weapon, but I didn't know you did a video on it! This is great.
@craftshark32213 жыл бұрын
I read about this weapon in "Treasures of the Smithsonian" and was delighted to see this excellent video !
@charlesjhemphilliii47924 жыл бұрын
Very informative and entertaining. I've always wanted to see one loaded and fired. Very good!
@michealdean37504 жыл бұрын
This is a lot better than I remember. Cool.
@warpigsbustedknucklegarage36839 жыл бұрын
I live 15min from the Brandywine battlefield and drive down Rt 1 often and this will be another thing I reflect on as I pass the field.
@TwoMikesProductions9 жыл бұрын
Such a cool piece. Had a chance to use one of these last november. Loved it.
@SpiridonovRU9 жыл бұрын
Great! One of my favorite rifles!
@tenhundredkills9 жыл бұрын
Watching a flintlock firing in slow-motion never gets old!
@zeos386sx9 жыл бұрын
I have always wanted to see one of these in action ever since I read the louis lamour book
@jeffreyarnold29293 жыл бұрын
Amazing technology for that period of time. Very cool gun!
@edl31568 жыл бұрын
One of the drawbacks of this rifle was that in closing the breech, heat from friction sometimes caused premature ignition.
@blackriflex399 жыл бұрын
Ferguson is buried a few miles from my house ... Kings mountian NC
@thesixteenthstudent2055 жыл бұрын
Fascinating that this kind of thing already existed back in 18th century
@ThePerfectRed7 жыл бұрын
21 dislikes.. must be rebels in the American colonies.
@mahirshahriyar5455 жыл бұрын
Now it’s up to 38.
@GrasshopperKelly5 жыл бұрын
Na, they're just upset they can't get Daddy's Debit card to buy the Empire total war DLC's..
@mahirshahriyar5455 жыл бұрын
Grasshopper K that was awesome😂👌
@joshuabrown78155 жыл бұрын
“Why are there so many gentlemen from the colonies?”
@terrorfire85054 жыл бұрын
Damn rebels
@Leverguns504 жыл бұрын
Very interesting, Nice to see shot into the Ballistics soap
@JJfromPhilly674 жыл бұрын
Would love to have one of these.
@leakycheese9 жыл бұрын
Excellent video on a fascinating weapon, thanks Ian.
@dimitriwolfs93708 жыл бұрын
Hope the soldiers could use it faster than you Ian! Haha
@bunkysdad4 жыл бұрын
Definitely had to give a thumbs up for this interesting rifle.
@TomRussellatAFA6 жыл бұрын
Very interesting treatise of the Ferguson. Thx
@GeFeldz4 жыл бұрын
Those big bore rifles really do leave scary wound channels... Just imagine that marble of lead shattering bone... YIKES!
@jamesfarmer60048 жыл бұрын
Had the British Army and perhaps Navy "Admiralty" adopted this Ferguson Breech Loader in quantity perhaps we would have lost the American Revolutionary War (1775-1776). Even during the Napoleonic Wars (1798-1815), and War of 1812 (1812-1815) the Ferguson design could have been continued and no doubt made a difference militarily. The modern reproduction/replica as shown here is an impressive weapon indeed! In the hands of a skilled shooter this could easily drop a deer or elk, even moose and caribou, up to 200 yards with lethal accuracy. It would be neat to read an article in a gun magazine where a Ferguson breech loader like one in video is actually utilized to put fresh venison or elk, moose, or caribou meat in the family freezer. ---James A. "Jim" Farmer Ashland, Oregon
@TheSteelEcho6667 жыл бұрын
James Farmer I don't think that was viable, the gun was too difficult and expensive to manufacture, and took more training to use. And you did lose the War of 1812.
@amaethon21177 жыл бұрын
TinnedTommy I was going say that. Since when did America win the of 1812....is that what they believe over there. God I hope they don't think they won the Vietnam war aswell.
@JaM-R2TR46 жыл бұрын
actually, in that time, it didnt played much role how weapon was accurate.. black powder would obscure the battlefield anyway, so accurate fire was practically impossible after first salvo.. French knew that very well, as their Tirailleurs initially got rifles, but refused to use them in battle so got their muskets back - they mostly complained that at common range added accuracy is not that important, but rate of fire was much higher with musket, and it could use effectively a bayonet..
@BigWillyG10006 жыл бұрын
@@TheSteelEcho666 Nobody lost 1812. Canada was really the only winner.
@chrisgibson52674 жыл бұрын
Canada was retained by the British and the second American invasion defeated. Win for Canada. There was widespread opposition to the war in New England and this had political ramifications in the 1812/ 1813 election to the House of Representatives. The war was pushed through Congress by Messrs Clay and Calhoun as it would permit the US to grab valuable farmland in Canada. Connecticut, Massachusetts and Rhode Island refused to place their mitia under Federal control for duty outside of their states and there were a number of protests against Mr Madison's War. It is said that New York militia men baulked at the idea of fighting their neighbours who they regarded as friends and men placed the safety of their families over than fighting in a war they did not support ( General George McLure). No other war had the degree of opposition from elected officials than this the first war declared by the US. Britain had no designs on American land. America however wanted to expel the British from North America and add the territory to the US. The real concern for Britain was Imperial France's attempt to take over Europe. PS Who beat General Henry " Light Horse" Lee senseless and at the same time beat James Lingham ( a veteran of the American Revolution) to death?
@johnferguson1853 жыл бұрын
I love the Ferguson rifle for obvious reasons
@astridvallati47622 жыл бұрын
The skill in making the Breech Plug and Matching Tapered Body Threads... By hand in 1776!!! And an 11-start Thread to boot. A modern replica would need a Broaching Machine with Helical advance ( CNC assisted) to cut the Breech Thread, and a 5 axis CNC Mill to do the Plug...a work of Art, mechanically...and making 200of them as well!!! Doc AV
@curtite9 жыл бұрын
Heard of this rifle but never seen it. Always wondered how that bolt worked so quickly. The eleven threaded leads for the helix makes a lot of sense. Wonder how a 2F powder would work in the barrel. Thank you so much for this demonstration.
@TheWhoamaters3 жыл бұрын
Very cool to see how much the threading bites into that lead
@TheIrishAmish7 күн бұрын
Ian, I’m sure he LOVED you whacking his rifle.
@CommentFrom5 жыл бұрын
I'm a simple man, I see Ian at the range in a thumbnail, I click.
@SammeLagom6 жыл бұрын
Great vids Ian! Love your work!
@versal3399 жыл бұрын
I believe a company called Narragansett Arms Company were building those in the 1990's I am pretty sure they are out of business now. That one looks like a very fine piece. I am sure they were very expensive at the time and are much more expensive now, if you could even find one. Great video. Another gun you won't see shot any place else. Thanks Ian.
@wasntmeXYZ Жыл бұрын
It’s a good thing that they weren’t smart enough to grasp the concept of this and how this rifle in sufficient quantities and properly employed could have changed history.
@pckkaboo68005 жыл бұрын
Magnificent! From a single ember to boom..
@bonzomcduffy83365 жыл бұрын
Duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuude love you channel.
@futuresonex6 жыл бұрын
I've always wanted one of those!
@Sheerwater9099 жыл бұрын
Impressive weapon and informative video. Thank you.
@random.9238 Жыл бұрын
This weapon is beautiful !
@NavySturmGewehr9 жыл бұрын
The slow motion was fantastic! It would have been interesting to see the results if the greasy excess powder would have worked.
@monyclair53577 жыл бұрын
This is a fantastic gun, really ! And nobody have see the potential of a breech feeding RIFLE at napoleonics wars ? Really ?
@77gravity5 жыл бұрын
The British were successful in spite of their frequent blindness and stupidity.
@emorynguyen15834 жыл бұрын
What?
@zacharyrollick61694 жыл бұрын
Napoleon rejected the idea of having a breech loading cartridge rifle when he was offered one. The technology was too new and untested.
@medicolkie36064 жыл бұрын
It would've been stupidly expensive to arm every soldier with a brand new rifle and ammo.
@twforster159 жыл бұрын
I love this rifle! I've been to kings mountain and seen an original and I can't help but fall in love with the Ferguson rifle. It's second only to the Kentucky rifle in my book!
@FrankyBabes9 жыл бұрын
Saw one of these at the Royal Armouries in Leeds a couple of summers ago. VERY interesting stuff
@koabd43514 жыл бұрын
had to watch since "The Ferguson Rifle " was the first Louis Lamour book I ever read
@lorenzomedina62204 жыл бұрын
Ernest Hemmingway looks good !
@233NATOMAN9 жыл бұрын
Great to see the rifle in use. Very impressive especially when all one usually sees are book illustrations. How about testing for range and accuracy.
@ZacFu649 жыл бұрын
I've wanted one of these so bad, but you can't find repos anywhere. It was my favorite rifle in the game Gun.
@annhanntz275 Жыл бұрын
There is one on display at Washingtons Headqaurters in Morristown NJ Museum, a real one!
@TheMiseriaCantare9 жыл бұрын
This channel needs more ballistic soap!
@Riazor13709 жыл бұрын
The idea that the spilled powder could put in the priming pan was brilliant. They should have cut the channel between the hole and the pan to direct the powder.
@Cal60099 жыл бұрын
Very decent firearm, especially for the time, surprised this didn't catch on.
@ragimundvonwallat89618 жыл бұрын
+Cal6009 during campaign muskets were lost by the tens of thousands....for the time that baby required alot of precision work,it was just too expensive to be issued. in the early 1700 king louis xiv had a 6 shot revolving musket/shotgun for hunting....people knew cool thing sice a long time ago,but the industrial capacity were still too low to issue those marvel to 400 000 armies.....just keeping the arsenal full of simple musket during conflict for big powers was already hard enough also when i mean expensive im not only speaking of money,kings would had been ready to pay 'the price' in cash to issue it....but before industrialisation the hours was also a problem,even with thousands of workers they could just not produce enough.
@nevanderson11647 жыл бұрын
"...muskets were lost by the tens of thousands..." you are confused. This is a British weapon, used by the British Army. They were highly trained and held to exacting standards, where it was a court martial offence to lose a Regimental brass button. You are incorrectly applying slap dash American attitudes, where a soldier may put down his weapon to open some gum and wander off without it. Or just claim a new one to save the bother of carrying it back.
@SepticFuddy7 жыл бұрын
If you think an American soldier is allowed to put his weapon down, you are mistaken. If you're talking about back then, gum didn't exist yet. And they didn't have much of a supply line to work with, so unless you just won a battle you'd better have a good hold on your weapon. Most American weapons at the start of the war were personal weapons unless the local militia had set up an armory, until enough British weapons had been captured to change that.
@MisdirectedSasha7 жыл бұрын
Some American militia groups had formed before the revolution (even under colonial orders IIRC), and others received weapons and ammunition from France after the fighting started, but it is true that a lot of them provided their own equipment. That said, the amount of people I've seen losing stuff they own and paid incredible amounts of money for...
@isiahrodriguez647 жыл бұрын
Cal6009 My guess is that it was expensive and very hard to manufacture while not being that much better than a standard rifle
@jonminer98914 жыл бұрын
Hi, Ian. Louis L'Amour wrote a story called "The Ferguson Rifle." His books aer not illustrated, except for cover art, so thre was no drawing of the rifle. It is interesting to see what it looked like. Thanks for sharing! Stay healthy!