I hope this helps ! Please share and like it really helps!
@ayeshajaved334310 ай бұрын
Thanku so much for explaining in such a easy and understandable way I just got very confused while solving Stirling approximation but after watching this video my all queries is clear now. Once again tq sir
@vedxgaming82162 жыл бұрын
Hey, this is Raj Dhakad. Thanks for the video, I have exams next month and this helped
@PhysicsBanglaTutorial2 жыл бұрын
Thanks you so much. I think, this is the best video on topics.
@BabuLal-db2dq Жыл бұрын
He : that's so simple Me : Why not when you read it before one day of exam
@paranayaninandhagiri45463 жыл бұрын
Tq for explaining
@mathOgenius3 жыл бұрын
glad it helped :)
@chetanya_sharma2 жыл бұрын
Bhai IIT Indore mein padhane aa jao :-)
@岡安一壽-g2y Жыл бұрын
Another method (n1,n2,・・・nk):distribution probability P(n1,n2,・・・,nk)=(N!/Πni!)Πgi(gi-1)・・・(gi-ni+1)Πexp(- α- βεi)^ni=(N!/Πni!)Πgi(gi-1)・・・(gi-ni+1) exp(- αN- βE) In equilibrium, P(・・・,ni+1,・・・)/P(・・・,ni,・・・)≒1 Therefore, P(・・・,ni+1,・・・)/P(・・・,ni,・・・)=(N+1)(gi-ni)exp(- α- βεi)/(ni+1)≒1 N+1≒N, ni+1≒ni → N(gi-ni)exp(- α- βεi)/ni≒1 ∴ ni/gi≒1/{(1/N)exp(α+βεi)+1}=1/{(Z/N)exp(βεi)+1} Z=Σgi/{exp(βεi)+1}
@lavelup33573 жыл бұрын
please derive for compton effect
@rajabhamis82722 жыл бұрын
👍
@yougetchandan3 жыл бұрын
i am confused that the e in the equation is the euler number or the exponential thing that we see in a scientific calculator...if its exponential then why e^2 is not 100???
@mathOgenius3 жыл бұрын
2.718 , e is the euler number,also the exponential thing you see in calc is also euler number e. and e^2 is 7.38 something
@yougetchandan3 жыл бұрын
@@mathOgenius but I know that e2 is used to replace 10^2 which should be equal to 100 but 2.718^2 is not 100...please explain I am really confused...by the way thanks for replying.
@mathOgenius3 жыл бұрын
I think you are confused with the bases of log, kzbin.info/www/bejne/hKiopmyklsSqoMU watch this video , its quite old but will clear .