Why No Time To Die is the PERFECT Ending (feat. Daniel Craig) | Video Essay

[@MrEddiyOwen]

Bond says "I'll never see you again"... and she knows he means it, so she grabs her stomach, because she knew she was pregnant but hadn't told him yet. It's an incredible scene

[@urbantwiist4363]

Incredible acting

[@acematthewocampo2181]

i honestly thought she has a heart condition of sorts because people who have some sort of heart conditions should refrain from high emotions then when i saw the child "oh so she was pregnant that's why. great detail there

[@niharikapasricha5346]

He says ' you'll never see me again

[@freddierodriguez3036]

Interesting how our brains try to make sense of things and make connections. I just thought she held her diaphragm as she gasped for air.

[@MrEddiyOwen]

@@ezeztztztz she has the same trust issues as Bond (that's one of the reasons they're together), she knows he's willing to let her die in the DB5, hence she begs. People who suffer from anthropophobia expect the next interaction to lead to rejection, the most serious cases will find any excuse to push away first (anti social personality disorder), even though they don't really want it. Hence she knows why he's putting her on the train, these kind of interactions become like games to some couples, but they love each other, hence the almost playful way she says 'this is it then', but follows it up with 'how will I know you're OK?' as in just another lovers tiff, but his response grounds her. She hadn't told him about the pregnancy, he was still suffering from vesper, hence why they were in Italy, where she promises to let something go if he does; as in her fear of rejection allowing her to tell him about the baby. I'm an idiot though, so don't trust the anything online

[@hugh_gene]

I really cried in the cinema, because not only did Bond die in an act of self sacrifice but also because i felt like my childhood hero died and that really hit hard.

[@aaronwalderslade]

I so agree. This was Bond's curtain call, and it transcended the specific actor. I bawled my eyes out for the same reason, and when the gang back at S.I.S. raised their classes to him, I gave him a Royal Navy salute and I didn't care who in the cinema saw me do it. It was like a knife in my heart watching Bond, James Bond, a character who has been there through my whole life, say farewell. I'm tearing up now just writing this. 😥

[@samhenderson6474]

@@Dman3827 At least it said: "James Bond Will Return" after the end credits. Plus, Ian Fleming attempted to kill off Bond in the novels, twice.

[@brandonkimberlin6272]

SAME SHIT!!! I'm a 24 year old man I was in my early teens when I can out...Dude changed the whole way I look at Bond as a person!

[@garethmatthews7939]

@@samhenderson6474 i thought only once the novel you only live twice

[@cgm4379]

Grow up

[@brucesnow7125]

It was just a delightful film for me. Could it have been more focused? Sure. Perhaps have a stronger villain? Absolutely. But it doesn't matter, because the experience, the character development, the story I got were all fantastic and emotionally thrilling. This is easily the most satisfying exit Bond actor got and I couldn't be happier.

[@jasonshaneyfelt1039]

It's not 100% perfect, but it's all I ever wanted for the send-off to this version of Bond

[@knowledgedumpingservice2435]

EXTREMELY RELIABLE SOURCE CLAIMS CRAIG'S BOND IS STILL ALIVE AND DISGUISING HIS VOICE AS A SCOTSMAN: kzbin.info/www/bejne/eaqopp-draZ6psk

[@master-of-mind5881]

I loved the ending I thought it was a fitting end to the Daniel Craig era of bond films. What distinguishes these films from the others is the narrative. From quantum to NTTD, each film serves as a sequel, a direct continuation of the previous chapter hence why we have reoccurring characters, themes and subplots making the series it’s own distinctive universe, separate from any other iteration of the character. It’s within this context that the death of bond is justified. Daniel Craig’s bond made the character more tangible, adding emotional complexities and nuanced motifs to the role not quite seen before. The character of bond is renowned for his misogyny, detached demeanour, dry sense of humour, and abrasive tactics however we’ve seen this countless times over the decades. Craig’s bond was conceived to subvert the boundaries in narrative and character development. Each film puts the titular hero in a predicament, forcing him to constantly adjust his morals and principals. Each film helped elevate the character to new heights, replenishing any flaws in his armour. This was a thinking man’s bond, a man who was born to kill hearts but spends his whole life missing his own. His death is foreshadowed throughout the film so it doesn’t come off as a radical tactic made to provoke shock value. It comes off as earnest, Craig has played the role with much finesse over his 15 year tenure, at first he was just another actor playing bond. Now bond is embedded in his DNA. He is bond. He plays the character so well ageing like fine wine, exuding much maturity in such an iconic role, that has been played many times before. A good story requires a finite conclusion where everything is wrapped up with a bow, leaving no stone unturned. Bond fell in love again, he discovers he is a father and after a life of endless missions resulting in countless kills, he realises the beauty in preserving life, even at the cost of his own. Like safin said -“the whole point of life is to leave soemthing behind.” The set up for this was sufficient in that he had this history with Madeline, who was the catalyst for his poignant death. Only in death do we learn the true value of life. If they were ever going to kill off bond this was the best way to do it. With a build up, over several movies that developed the character, making him more relatable, more palatable, so that when the big moment comes, you actually really feel it. Daniel Craig has worked his ass off to entertain and deliver a unique take on the role, maintaining an opinion is fine, but just be grateful for all the hard work that he put in just for us. It’s not the conclusion we deserved but the one we needed…

[@douglasduguid3042]

@@master-of-mind5881 so very well said. Thank you for this!

[@jakedowell7457]

Exactly. People analyse it and say it’s got plot holes and whatever. But the enjoyment I got from it was more than many other films I’ve ever seen

[@Auruchius]

I thought it was a wonderful yet somber conclusion to one of the best and morally complex renditions of Bond we've had probably ever. Craig's era will sorely be missed for sure.

[@FilmSpeak]

cheers to that! Couldn't agree more

[@ringbearer1420]

Craig’s era certainly left me sore.

[@lazgrillo6982]

@@FilmSpeak I can't get my head around the producers deciding to let bond Breed and Die. The timeline mash ups and from the Mendes era were a mis step and now, by closing off two things that were intrinsic to a charachter, I think they've made it unneccesarily difficult to carry on with any credibility.

[@ysthafellgynghori8423]

Not by me he won't.

[@mawinstallation6626]

*surely

[@alekesam]

As a major fan of Timothy Dalton's Bond, Craig's take was most welcome to me. NTTD, to me, not only closed out Craig's run with panache, it completed a 15 year story with much heart and consideration, calling back confidently to the prior Bond movies.

[@crobeastness]

Dalton is my favourite and Craig is my 4th. both are similar, but where Dalton had menace, Craig has disinterest and is a bit wooden. in between them are Brosnan and Connery respectively, but all my top 4 are in a really close S-tier race. i don't understand Moore fans at all. great actor, badly directed as bond.

[@alekesam]

@@crobeastness It's probably a product of who you grew up with. I don't know many Moore fans who didn't grow up with him. It's funny to me how much shit Craig got when he was announced when Moore is the epitome of unbelievable spy/not right for the role. The only thing I can believe him being Bond is being a womanizer. Other than that, nada.

[@crobeastness]

@@alekesam isn't Calvin Dyson's favourite bond Moore? And he grew up with Brosnan. I did too (grow up with Brosnan) and also know some Moore fans, I think mainly because they saw Austin Powers first. Or they just like Bond ironically. Unfortunately, Craig's era is frustrating. I haven't seen the latest one yet, but if find Quantum unwatchable because of the editing and blocking. The more I watch it, the more I feel like having a headache. And both Sam Mendes ones are actually silly bond movies mascarading as serious. These ones I still like significantly more than Quantum but some aspects are so cartoonish. First 2 acts of Skyfall is the dark knight, which is fine, it goes different enough, but the 3rd act is Home Alone and M goes with him for no reason. Spectre takes a plot point straight from the 3rd Austin Powers. I didn't even like it in Austin Powers because I thought it was joking the shark in that series even.

[@paddydamen8035]

@@crobeastness True that, Dalton was a proper bond. Combined with John Barry he was up there with Sean.

[@spaceodds1985]

@@crobeastness Dalton is my favourite followed by Moore. I grew up in the Brosnan era (first Bond film I saw at the cinema was Goldeneye when I was 10) and he is for me the weakest Bond to date.

[@collinisrollininhisgrave7897]

I loved how his relationship with Madeleine contrasted Vesper one. With Vesper, he was immature and reckless, so they would often clash and argue until they reached a point where they could find love. With Madeleine, it was just pure subtle intimacy. It was more mature, less argumentative. The actors sold the hell out of their roles by conveying so much without many dialogues. Like that scene when they come face to face in a hallway, you could just tell what they're feeling just from their facial expressions alone. Or that amazing train scene? Freaking hell, what a great way to wrap up his story on so many levels.

[@anki-11.11]

Yes you are so right the hallway scene was my favourite of all ,the sudden change in the expression omg you could feel what they were feeling.this what I call chemistry and acting.Train scene is so heart breaking but it shows us how strong their feeling for each other.The way Madeline love band the way he loves her....this is what bond searched for his whole life ...this connection.

[@MichelMawon4982]

Well stated

[@roycedot]

Mature? He falsely thought Madeleine tried to kill him

[@MichaSennin]

Yet Vesper remained the love of his Life till the very End and nothing will ever change that.

[@treystiemsma7329]

I loved Anna De Armas in No time to die, she was a great addition to the movie and made that part of the movie fun.

[@thefalsekingslayer3717]

What a female bond would need to be (not dying that should be a thing)

[@katashworth41]

Whilst I don’t think there was enough of her, more possibly wouldn’t have been better.

[@Dan-zc7ut]

@@thefalsekingslayer3717 I hope that a female bond doesn’t happen

[@thefalsekingslayer3717]

@@Dan-zc7ut me too. Trust me. But if it was going to happen I would want it to be like her character

[@siddhant...]

@@thefalsekingslayer3717 nah, they won’t do that I’m sure. Too big of a franchise to ruin. It’s going to be a man, like it should be. Daniel Craig anyways put this discussion to death with his statement.

[@errhka]

Director Cary and the writers did an incredible job with the monumental story task they had ahead of them after the story stutter that is Spectre. From successfully developing the relationship between Madeleine and Bond, to making sure that we got moments of 'the gang' with Bond/Q/and Moneypenny, to the brilliant surprise of the ending (which I so rarely experience in films nowadays) - I believe No Time to Die, even with some of its faults, will age like a fine wine into the future. Your breakdown of Safin's motivations is exquisite as well - he is a crazy and broken person trying to use others to justify his own sick understanding of the world. Craig's decision to make give this character 'weakness' (i.e. Normal human issues) was one of the best things to ever happen to bond. It gives more empathy from the audience, more nuance, and most importantly more stakes to whatever he is going through. As soon as he sees Mathilde you can almost hear the switch click in his mind. For the rest of the movie you know he will move mountains to make sure they can get out of this hell they find themselves in safely. The purpose of being a father is a natural ending to his arc as the movies spend much of their time asking bond 'why do you do the things you do'. With his daughter in the picture the answer to that question snaps into crystal clarity, which is a fitting capstone to his development over the films. Being born in the 90s, I can relate to the feelings you have with Craig being our Bond. We were so lucky to have an actor that brought so much to the role and so lucky to have crews that gave their all to build this series. I'm really going to miss it :')

[@epiphany55]

@@Tarcidz Not really. It's not like Bond as the same human has existed for 50 years. Each Bond has been its own distinct life story. We know each version of Bond would have become too old for service and died eventually anyway. What's the difference if this Bond goes out with a bang and then a new Bond emerges years later? Also, I don't understand what is woke about it. It's just an uncomfortable outcome. Film can get too safe and predictable sometimes.

[@master-of-mind5881]

I loved the ending I thought it was a fitting end to the Daniel Craig era of bond films. What distinguishes these films from the others is the narrative. From quantum to NTTD, each film serves as a sequel, a direct continuation of the previous chapter hence why we have reoccurring characters, themes and subplots making the series it’s own distinctive universe, separate from any other iteration of the character. It’s within this context that the death of bond is justified. Daniel Craig’s bond made the character more tangible, adding emotional complexities and nuanced motifs to the role not quite seen before. The character of bond is renowned for his misogyny, detached demeanour, dry sense of humour, and abrasive tactics however we’ve seen this countless times over the decades. Craig’s bond was conceived to subvert the boundaries in narrative and character development. Each film puts the titular hero in a predicament, forcing him to constantly adjust his morals and principals. Each film helped elevate the character to new heights, replenishing any flaws in his armour. This was a thinking man’s bond, a man who was born to kill hearts but spends his whole life missing his own. His death is foreshadowed throughout the film so it doesn’t come off as a radical tactic made to provoke shock value. It comes off as earnest, Craig has played the role with much finesse over his 15 year tenure, at first he was just another actor playing bond. Now bond is embedded in his DNA. He is bond. He plays the character so well ageing like fine wine, exuding much maturity in such an iconic role, that has been played many times before. A good story requires a finite conclusion where everything is wrapped up with a bow, leaving no stone unturned. Bond fell in love again, he discovers he is a father and after a life of endless missions resulting in countless kills, he realises the beauty in preserving life, even at the cost of his own. Like safin said -“the whole point of life is to leave soemthing behind.” The set up for this was sufficient in that he had this history with Madeline, who was the catalyst for his poignant death. Only in death do we learn the true value of life. If they were ever going to kill off bond this was the best way to do it. With a build up, over several movies that developed the character, making him more relatable, more palatable, so that when the big moment comes, you actually really feel it. Daniel Craig has worked his ass off to entertain and deliver a unique take on the role, maintaining an opinion is fine, but just be grateful for all the hard work that he put in just for us. It’s not the conclusion we deserved but the one we needed…

[@MsTriangle]

The love story was completely unbelievable

[@roycedot]

Jumbled story. Safin randomly stating his love for Madeleine. Weak ending for Blofeld (dies off-screen and why wouldn’t he suspect somebody would try to kill him with nano bots in prison when somebody killed all his associates ). Madeleine not recognizing Safin later in life. Safin just letting Bond’s daughter go free when he could have used a hostage as leverage. Ana de Armis jammed in - that shootout scene could have gone exactly the same without her, and ridiculous that they stop for a drink during the shootout

[@luke8801]

James Bond as an awkward dad is something I never knew I needed.

[@freddylowe4900]

This video is superb, so thoroughly researched, and absolutely correct. I adored No Time To Die (and so did most critics, which is why I was saddened by the social media noise), so I’m thrilled to find a video that defends it so well. I love your Bond video essays!

[@sigma_six]

you must be new to the Franchise then, you should try reading a few of the original books

[@freddylowe4900]

@@sigma_six I love the books! Long-time fan.

[@AliDixon95]

Critics get it wrong all the time

[@warbler1984]

If I may offer the opposing view I felt that while it went back to the old Bond with over the top villains and daft gadgets like Macguffin nanobots this is classic Bond but lacked the grit and base in a more solid reality that peaked with Casino Royale which is why I adore Craig's Bond

[@Zack_410]

Every really hyped film gets a bit of a hate train and then it cools down.

[@cynicalfella]

When I saw the ending credits, and was almost at home I was like..."what about Dou Dou?" And bust out crying

[@spaceodds1985]

Dou Dou took a dump🤣 Sorry couldn’t resist saying it

[@alexman378]

Dou Dou went out in a blaze of glory

[@master-of-mind5881]

I loved the ending I thought it was a fitting end to the Daniel Craig era of bond films. What distinguishes these films from the others is the narrative. From quantum to NTTD, each film serves as a sequel, a direct continuation of the previous chapter hence why we have reoccurring characters, themes and subplots making the series it’s own distinctive universe, separate from any other iteration of the character. It’s within this context that the death of bond is justified. Daniel Craig’s bond made the character more tangible, adding emotional complexities and nuanced motifs to the role not quite seen before. The character of bond is renowned for his misogyny, detached demeanour, dry sense of humour, and abrasive tactics however we’ve seen this countless times over the decades. Craig’s bond was conceived to subvert the boundaries in narrative and character development. Each film puts the titular hero in a predicament, forcing him to constantly adjust his morals and principals. Each film helped elevate the character to new heights, replenishing any flaws in his armour. This was a thinking man’s bond, a man who was born to kill hearts but spends his whole life missing his own. His death is foreshadowed throughout the film so it doesn’t come off as a radical tactic made to provoke shock value. It comes off as earnest, Craig has played the role with much finesse over his 15 year tenure, at first he was just another actor playing bond. Now bond is embedded in his DNA. He is bond. He plays the character so well ageing like fine wine, exuding much maturity in such an iconic role, that has been played many times before. A good story requires a finite conclusion where everything is wrapped up with a bow, leaving no stone unturned. Bond fell in love again, he discovers he is a father and after a life of endless missions resulting in countless kills, he realises the beauty in preserving life, even at the cost of his own. Like safin said -“the whole point of life is to leave soemthing behind.” The set up for this was sufficient in that he had this history with Madeline, who was the catalyst for his poignant death. Only in death do we learn the true value of life. If they were ever going to kill off bond this was the best way to do it. With a build up, over several movies that developed the character, making him more relatable, more palatable, so that when the big moment comes, you actually really feel it. Daniel Craig has worked his ass off to entertain and deliver a unique take on the role, maintaining an opinion is fine, but just be grateful for all the hard work that he put in just for us. It’s not the conclusion we deserved but the one we needed…

[@zoestarbuck9892]

@@master-of-mind5881 Thank you!! For such a thoughtful and well written comment! You expressed my thoughts exactly, but much more eloquently than I could. You’re point about Craig being a thinking man’s Bond is very true, and a surprising number of people seem to completely miss that. I was extremely satisfied with this film, it got me in the feels multiple times and the ending made me cry, which I’ll admit I was not expecting. Any blockbuster action movie that can pull off that much emotion and humanity is deserving of respect, even more so in a Bond film. The Craig era has been amazing, and his send-off was fantastic. I am heartily looking forward to what they think up next.

[@gayatrisangra4968]

@ i

[@vastsleep7152]

No Time to Die is a beautiful send off for Daniel Craig. It’s obviously not perfect but none are. But by far I think this is the most emotional Bond movie. From starting off feeling betrayed and sunken to feeling engaged and excited to finally feeling extremely nervous and sad. Then once it ends you feel sad yet happy at the same time. Such a great film. (Also I can’t forget to give a ton of credit to Hans Zimmer. One of the all time greats)

[@buffen2496]

Casino is perfect

[@yaboicatman]

Casino Royale, Skyfall, and No Time to Die all stand out as some of the best movies ever made, not just Bond movies. Even Quantum and Spectre have those moments but I think the franchise took a huge leap forward with the Craig Era.

[@jakedowell7457]

Yeh Craig has completely transformed the franchise from misogynistic, action-packed stand-alone movies to dark, dramatic movies that follow on from each other and develop bond

[@user-jx5rm3ql6p]

They Are so bad

[@jojosoni6355]

I wouldn't say no time to die is one of the best movie ever made. Skyfall was pretty great except that home alone type ending fight scene.

[@jakedowell7457]

@@jojosoni6355 yeh perhaps not the best ever made but defo the best film I’ve seen recently

[@ingolf82]

ah... I wouldn't go as far as to call skyfall and NTTD one of the best movies ever made. I would put The Dark knight Trilogy ahead of them. Casino Royale howerver is one of the best.

[@josephk6214]

I enjoyed the movie overall despite the plot inconsistencies -- the nanobots can do whatever we want for script purposes, Bond never known for being a quitter even in dire circumstances just resigns himself in the end (I get why), Safin's goals making little sense -- but I still found myself emotionally engaged throughout. The ending did bother me though as it felt unnecessarily cruel, even for this iteration of Bond. Death (at least for me) was the clear conclusion for this Bond's arc, which was why I was hoping they wouldn't go there. Yes, this Bond has lived by the sword and would more than likely die by the sword irl, but he thoroughly paid for his choices and the choices of the few close to him in every entry. Craig's Bond films are pretty dark thematically, but an ending where he finally walked away still could've worked. After 5 movies, Craig's Bond found a purpose and had fully given himself the chance to trust and love again. Even if he needed to suffer some form of consequence (mentally or physical or even both), he didn't have to die. The ending got me thinking though about how many cinematic heroes I've grown up watching that are dead now. Between Logan, Luke Skywalker, Han Solo, Iron Man, and now Craig's Bond, it feels like there's a throughline about these mythological pop culture icons (and the audience) being forced to confront their mortality and their eventual (but seemingly always destined) demise, dying for whatever cause we've grown up watching them fight for and we (as an audience) possibly take away for ourselves. It's usually always about sacrificing for a greater good -- or a cause revolving around putting the needs of others above the self regardless of the cost. Of course, these are the values and ideals we hold up for ourselves, but dramatically explore in storytelling. I know it's these values placed on these figures that help them transcend and become mythological, but damn am I getting annoyed seeing everybody die haha. It packs a punch when done well, but hurts even more when it's not or feels unnecessary (we all know one or a few). I know Craig and NTTD's director argued the ending is hopeful, but I'll just agree to disagree. Good movie and decent quality Bond flick, but definitely one I won't be eager to re-watch. Still glad I was able to grow up with Craig's Bond and Casino Royale will always be my favorite Bond flick 🖤

[@ringbearer1420]

Given most of the Bond films involve nukes… if you are going to kill Bond nuke him. Have him go out preventing nuclear Holocaust. That would frankly be perfect and poetic. Having him go out by nano-bots… is this a Marvel film? He doesn’t even go out fighting Blofeld, just some rando.

[@SC-ci2lr]

@@ringbearer1420 Bond killed Blofeld. Band was vaporized.

[@elvinantonioaguileragutirr3079]

It’s all a matter of perspective

[@tophat2776]

@@ringbearer1420 Craig became the next bond villain. Bonds greatest villian will be himself on the next iteration.

[@henrytong8707]

Bond died in the middle of the movie when he is making lunch for his kid.

[@HunterJ1999]

Really great analysis. Agree with pretty much every single point. Glad to see someone else who thinks Madeline Swann is an under appreciated character in this series. Despite the ending, this weirdly feels the most ‘Bondian’ of Craig’s movies. I cannot emphasise how much fun I had throughout this movie, where the film balances tension and fun so effortlessly.

[@knowledgedumpingservice2435]

Bond is still alive, it's been leaked: kzbin.info/www/bejne/eaqopp-draZ6psk

[@Zack_410]

Yeah. I liked Madeline in Spectre but this took her to a whole other level.

[@gameanimeking]

Honestly I have no idea how the next bond will be topped with Daniel Craig role of James Bond. I feel like the old actors of James Bond wish they could play the role Craig plays in his era. Honestly it started with the realistic rookie bond we got and ended with a James Bond at his peak, we got to experience his whole career as 007.

[@gtamediaproductions1]

Agreed! 100%

[@danielsiljeholm]

The next Bond actor will for sure find away to do that. It's not the first time the replace an actor in the role. Even if they change direction of the franchise.

[@droprelease4820]

@@danielsiljeholm I think a good way to go to not draw comparisons to Craig is do a period piece Bond series (say set around WWII -> Cold War period)

[@jackthorton10]

Now there’s a idea… going back to the enthralling years of espionage in wartime

[@IanMT56]

My friend and I started watching every Bond film in order and recording reviews earlier this year and we got to On Her Majesty’s Secret Service a week before we watched No Time To Die. It couldn’t have been timed more perfectly. I loved this film

[@vontravel]

I remain confused though. It is the end of this actor in the role. Just as all the others came to an “end” and did their last movie. But in addition, the character of James Bond was killed in NTTD. Never before. If JB is dead how can he come back? Don’t tell me he wakes up after a dream like Bobby Ewing in Dallas...

[@Zack_410]

@@vontravel JB films really don't follow a timeline.

[@aaronwalderslade]

That was a superb essay and gave clarity and shape to why I was so moved by this film. I feel sorry for anyone who missed the cinema release because anything less than a fifty foot screen does not do this historic moment justice. I was one of the fortunate few who were paid to watch the film.

[@mrboost101]

Thank you for this video, I had felt terrible about his death for several days after watching the film. But your explanation of this has given the entire saga of Craig, perhaps the best depiction of bond ever. Thank you.

[@gtamediaproductions1]

Daniel Craig took the Bond character and ran with it. He by far ended up as the best Bond to hit the silver screen. He raised the bar so high that only makes it so much harder for the next actor to play him a hell of a lot tougher to beat.

[@jonsmith4669]

They cant raise James Bond from the dead sorry...unless he didnt really die.....

[@SouthamptonCentral]

@@jonsmith4669 Each actor is in a different universe. The Craig stuff isn’t tied in with the same story as Connery, Moore, Dalton or Brosnan.

[@Basomic]

Thank you for this! As soon as I finished the film, I walked out of theater 10 into theater 11 to catch the second half again; I loved it! But it's been a bummer seeing all the hate the film has gotten. So thank you for this essay!

[@cooperwolfe5478]

I agree with you. I personally loved the film and I just don’t understand why people are giving it so much hate.

[@bonghunezhou5051]

Are they mostly coming from _older_ people - those whose 'first Bond' is apt to be Roger Moore, or even Pierce Brosnan?

[@cooperwolfe5478]

@@bonghunezhou5051 That could be a possibility, although the audience that I was in the theater with were all older and they seemed to love it as they gave it a standing ovation after the movie ended. I feel like it their were a lot of people who hated that he died and are judging the entire movie off that. If you don’t mind me asking what did you think of No Time to Die? I personally loved it, but if you felt differently I promise I won’t be disrespectful to your opinion.

[@master-of-mind5881]

I loved the ending I thought it was a fitting end to the Daniel Craig era of bond films. What distinguishes these films from the others is the narrative. From quantum to NTTD, each film serves as a sequel, a direct continuation of the previous chapter hence why we have reoccurring characters, themes and subplots making the series it’s own distinctive universe, separate from any other iteration of the character. It’s within this context that the death of bond is justified. Daniel Craig’s bond made the character more tangible, adding emotional complexities and nuanced motifs to the role not quite seen before. The character of bond is renowned for his misogyny, detached demeanour, dry sense of humour, and abrasive tactics however we’ve seen this countless times over the decades. Craig’s bond was conceived to subvert the boundaries in narrative and character development. Each film puts the titular hero in a predicament, forcing him to constantly adjust his morals and principals. Each film helped elevate the character to new heights, replenishing any flaws in his armour. This was a thinking man’s bond, a man who was born to kill hearts but spends his whole life missing his own. His death is foreshadowed throughout the film so it doesn’t come off as a radical tactic made to provoke shock value. It comes off as earnest, Craig has played the role with much finesse over his 15 year tenure, at first he was just another actor playing bond. Now bond is embedded in his DNA. He is bond. He plays the character so well ageing like fine wine, exuding much maturity in such an iconic role, that has been played many times before. A good story requires a finite conclusion where everything is wrapped up with a bow, leaving no stone unturned. Bond fell in love again, he discovers he is a father and after a life of endless missions resulting in countless kills, he realises the beauty in preserving life, even at the cost of his own. Like safin said -“the whole point of life is to leave soemthing behind.” The set up for this was sufficient in that he had this history with Madeline, who was the catalyst for his poignant death. Only in death do we learn the true value of life. If they were ever going to kill off bond this was the best way to do it. With a build up, over several movies that developed the character, making him more relatable, more palatable, so that when the big moment comes, you actually really feel it. Daniel Craig has worked his ass off to entertain and deliver a unique take on the role, maintaining an opinion is fine, but just be grateful for all the hard work that he put in just for us. It’s not the conclusion we deserved but the one we needed…

[@theseageek]

Those who hated this movie don’t have to wits to see through the art and meaning behind NTTD. They just don’t understand.

[@tyskyis4020]

I’m glad to see this one getting some love. To my surprise, a lot of people didn’t like this one. Despite that, I love it

[@FilmSpeak]

I can't say i'm surprised...when you shake up the status quo, people are traditionally reluctant to change lol

[@spaceodds1985]

@Skeletor Best comment yet. Well said👍

[@TagusMan]

@@FilmSpeak Not only is that dismissive but also sadly apologetic for what was a deeply flawed film. Shaking up the status quo without care for story or plot or characters or fans is what I call Last Jediism - where the filmmakers infect the film with their toxic reckless narcissism. Whenever the formula is shaken and stirred in a good way, we Bond fans all applaud. Pretending we don't is insulting. Mommy has been very bad.

[@FilmSpeak]

@Skeletor “Quickly made and half baked analysis” oh if you only knew how much I sunk into this you wouldn’t be saying such silly things. I’ve seen the film 4 times now, my thoughts and take on the film is cemented. That’s fine if you don’t like, I’m not saying those who don’t are reluctant to change, but there are MANY complaints out there from people who are simply mad at the fact that things aren’t the same as they have been. Again, you’re welcome to dislike it, I understand many do for valid reasons, some of my friends even do, but similarly to how you “called me out” for being dismissive, you must surely realize there is an equally significant portion of the fandom that DOES love this film for the reasons I put forth in this video. I am a lifelong Bond fan and won’t have my love of this film negated because you claim “the majority of regular Bond fans” dislike it. Incredibly arrogant of you to assume I’m blinded by recently seeing the film simply because my view doesn’t align with what you deem the “correct view.”

[@FilmSpeak]

@Skeletor That “audio” was from MY INTERVIEWS with Craig and Jeffrey Wright. I weaved them in as supporting examples and also because I got to speak with creatives who’ve had a profound impact on my life who happened to say things I agreed with and thought would offer more value to those watching this video. It wasn’t just “random audio integrations” or behind the scenes talk. Also wtf else do you want me to use as footage? Of course I have to use bts clips to fill out the video track because the film isn’t available and WON’T be for a long while. It’s what every single creator does, I’m literally just using footage available to me. You keep talking about being biased and showing one side, I talked about the things that hit me the most coming out of a film it’s a fucking editorial aka A VIDEO ESSAY. It’s my subjective opinion on a film I enjoyed and explained why IMO was an effective end. This isn’t some full step by step spoiler breakdown of the film, it’s a breakdown of what I enjoyed and what worked for me. With all that said, I also think I address a lot of the story elements and present MY REASONING/MY INTERPRETATION of why it works. Nothing about this is half assed and your dismissive tone and “I speak for all Bond fans” attitude is I credibly pompous and rude. Who are you to say what is an isn’t half assed? Did you say the same for the other channels you mentioned who put out videos far earlier than me? No, of course not because you agreed with them even though they’ve seen the film about the same if not less than I have. You’re doing exactly what you accused my very cheeky comment of doing. Your using objective terms such as “bad movies” “most people don’t like the film” as if your experience and the things you see is the only truth. Again, there are equally as many LOYAL LIFELONG Bond fans who enjoy this film as there are those who don’t. This isn’t a bad video because you disagree or I didn’t touch in certain things you wanted me to. How about you try not interpreting things in bad faith and realize there are people who don’t share your outlook? You want me to apologize for a cheeky comment? Fine, I’m sorry my comment directed towards a movement of people primed to hate the film before it’s release offended you. “Improve your content and not be a douche,” sounds like you should take some of your own advice.

[@TheOtherMJ_76]

I was initially surprised by Craig’s Bond, he won me over immediately with Casino Royale. I have liked his Bond ever since. I enjoyed all his films for the most part. NTTD was a good watch for me and I’ve seen it about 4 times. I know I really like it because anytime I stumble across it while channel surfing I never turn it off. I was genuinely sad when I realized Bond wasn’t going to miraculously escape this time. It felt like a fitting end to this version of Bond. I always look forward to Bond movies, and can’t wait to see where they go next.

[@thehedgehognerd]

I LOVED IT! It was brilliant end to this series. Daniel Craig went out not with a bang....but Sonic boom! I was really crying at the end, and I loved all callbacks to "On Her Majesty Secret Service". What more can I say....it was worth the wait. 11/10

[@hustonbop]

Finally!!! A review that recognizes the greatness of the CraigBond arc, and the legitimacy of this ending to NTTD! A great analysis… I was beginning to fear that no one “got” the Fleming angle… great job!!!😎

[@sigma_six]

by suggesting a woman is 007? somehow, I don't think Fleming had that in mind... Bond just dying?... and giving up when he can still walk? or even run? surrounded by unlimited technical gadgetry?... not the Ian Fleming character I remember

[@DavidHutchinson0713]

@@sigma_six "It's just a number" to those people in-universe. _We_ the audience may be bothered, but _they_ don't. And let's just say that Fleming's had quite some seriously outdated beliefs, and leave it at that. As for Bond giving up and dying like this, you forget that the Bond of the book is _far_ from the suave, cool spy who guns people down with a quip that the pre-Craig movies made the character to be. Fleming's Bond is, to put it mildly, a _fatalist._ He's a gloomy pessimist who carries his heavy burdens with weariness. He knows that, as an agent serving Her Majesty's Government, he's living under borrowed time. And there are points (the Moonraker novel has a couple of them) where Bond seems to _crave_ the idea of dying a glorious death in the name of Queen and country. Yet despite that, this Bond has a great deal of loyalty to the ones he cares about. No Time to Die's ending fits that: Bond found a purpose to live, and then he lost it for good. Anywhere he goes, he'll bring his loved ones closer to death. Having experienced that with Vesper, I think the revelation made him fall into despair, the same way book!Bond did after losing Tracy to Blofeld. Thus, he chose to face death head-on, the same way he always does.

[@d.k.borelli8267]

This is the best Video essay/Film analysis I have ever seen on Bond.....I'm going to write an article on how good your Analysis is! I love what you said about Safin.....people who don't like him as a villian can't grasp the level of evil he inhibits, therefore it would be easy for most people to prefer a shoot em up bang kind of villian, which are good too.....but this was perfect

[@HermSezPlayToWin]

NTTD is, despite some flaws, a great and fitting farewell to the DC interpretation of Bond. DC really got into the character's inner life throughout the five films, and long may that continue with the next Bond because it's made the films much more interesting. I do think the DC Bond was reinvented too much in the image of Jason Bourne, though. I hope the next Bond can find a better balance and bring back more of the suave master spy persona to the role. DC is 100% believable as action hero and cold blooded assassin, but he was never that convincing as the master spy of spies. The next Bond should ideally be someone who can match wits with the mastermind villains better, like how the early Connery films showed, and still be the badass action hero when he needs to be. Still, DC does get massive credit in my book for successfully rejuvenating the franchise. Thank you, Daniel Craig! 👏

[@katashworth41]

I’ve seen it twice and started crying earlier the second time round. I’m glad I had my other half there for the second time, if only to almost audibly hear his eyes roll at the magnets bit (that’s what his PhD is in). More than just the finality of the ending I think it really got to me as I went to see Casino Royale with my mum. In the 15 years since I’ve lost her, my dad, an auntie and a very good friend, I saw at least Bond film with all of them (aside from my Auntie) and it oddly felt like a closure for me.

[@MichelMawon4982]

Awe, I understand you

[@moneyball32]

This is the first Bond film that made be feel things. Like really FEEL things.

[@manysides2340]

Wow, your essay was extremely thoughtful, with wonderful point after another. First video of yours I’ve seen, and I’m very impressed.

[@FilmSpeak]

Thank you so much!

[@bemasaberwyn55]

Before my 8th birthday, my brothers and I were taken by our parents to a restaurant after midnight when the 3 of us couldn't sleep. Interrupting my step father watching a Roger Moore Bond film(I distinctly remember the "2000 bud" joke before we left). My next brush was in 98 or so when they were doing press for The World Is Not Enough. My grandfather let us watch it's predecessor Tomorrow Never Dies(making Brosnan my first 007, and introducing me to Michelle Yeoh). I remember watching both of Brosnan's final films once they hit home video. But I wasn't a 007 fan truly till I was 19(32 days before my 20th birthday). And with that film, Craig became my 007. Since the release of Skyfall, I've watched all of the Eon productions of 007. No Time To Die was freaking spectacular. From score, to story, to set pieces, to the actors involved everything was no less than stellar

[@IreneCara-TheOneAndOnly]

The actress who played Madlaline was the heart of this last film. I thought she was amazing in this!

[@darkecofreak23]

Beautiful retrospective of a great series of films. Well done, my friend.

[@jorgefelipegaviriafierro705]

Love this analysis man, yes its exactly that, he just wants someone or something to prove him wrong, to prove him that people change, more importantly, he is convinced that he can't change, but deep inside he doesn't want to admit that he could and that he desperetly wants to change, but not only that but that he needs a reason to change! Awesome movie.

[@omadayusjones6414]

Thank you for this heartfelt expansive analysis. We are blessed to have this 5 film continuum and most in depth layered portrayal of Bond ever to grace the screen. Nice work Sir.

[@Ironcabbit]

Part of the brilliance of this movie is all the poetic reflections of earlier Bond films (the entire final act of this film is a mirror of the first act of Dr. No), the first act of this movie informing the ultimate fate of Bond and the multiple nods to classic films and filmmakers (Bond in the last act of this film becomes a Kurosawa protagonist).

[@nightrider8519]

this may be my favorite bond movie

[@barry4649]

I still think if they were going to kill off James Bind they should’ve set it up better with a much more fleshed out villain and actually ended it there and then instead of immediately getting a new lead Bond actor

[@mcmoose64]

This is the only Bond movie , that for me at least , had genuine emotional impact . There were real stakes at play . In this story Bond became a human being as opposed to a caricature .

[@Fresh_Daisy501]

Greatly appreciate your take on NTTD, only makes me admire Daniel Craig and ALL his Bond films even MORE (if that's possible). Spot-on re: Madeleine Swann and Bond gaslighting her, getting emotionally used and abused by key male figures. Ironic and perfect that she's a therapist. As for the ending, Bond could easily be resurrected--- look how he survived after getting shot and never drowned after crashing into the water in Skyfall. All the nanobots in his bloodstream could've made him invincible.

[@MrJabbothehut]

He got direct hit by a missile. He dead.

[@bhuxtablesmith]

@@MrJabbothehut Completely agree you do not survive a missile landing on your head hahaha. But he can definitely be rebooted

[@MrJabbothehut]

@@bhuxtablesmith exactly. All the Bonds have no continuity to each other except in their childhood stories and upbringing. Rebooting is no problem!

[@ysthafellgynghori8423]

Daniel Craig killed the Bond franchise.

[@MrJabbothehut]

@@ysthafellgynghori8423 agree to disagree. I loved the Sean Connery ones and loved the Craig ones.

[@psyifinotic]

how does this not have way more views?? man got Daniel Craig and Jeffrey Wright, along with a stellar script and great editing.

[@NoName-xc6cg]

I just like to think about how perfect the Craig era could have been if it had been planned out for 5 or however many movies from the beginning. Still, very happy about how things turned out.

[@aaronwalderslade]

No way could something have been planned as well as it turned out. Planning is a millstone to creativity. I would argue that it's the fact that the people working on Bond had the imagination and the will to make the most of whatever direction the films were going in and to work at 110% with loyalty and spirit, that's the very reason this balloon stays up at all. Filmmaking is so full of compromises and surprises that while you may plan, and plan well, you must be prepared and able to change your plan completely film time to time...

[@VinceTheMovieMan]

I loved it. Saw it on Tuesday In IMAX. Thought it was a beautiful ending to daniel craig as bond

[@therealriverryan]

I saw it twice. Amazing end to the Daniel Craig's Bond era. I'm gong to miss him.

[@kutzkej]

Uhhhh I never expected to cry during a video essay on NTTD, thanks for making me take another look at it past my first reaction and see it as a whole.

[@provablegrub4581]

Just a correction, Andrew Scott isn’t a British actor. He’s Irish.

[@UGeniuss.]

Thank u im irish i tried to tell him the same thing

[@katashworth41]

He is bloody good at being Welsh in Pride though.

[@kotowaza-sensei428]

Noticed the road they drive uphill in the DB5 to the "we got all the time in the world" theme is awfully reminiscent of the road George Lazenby and Diana Rigg drive downhill in OHMSS? There's no way that's a coincidence. Truly masterful direction from Fukunaga.

[@jazzx251]

Definitely. I sat and listened to the song at the end of the movie (it was Louis Armstrong's last ever song) - only when it had finished did I leave my seat - the last one to exit the theatre at 1:40 AM

[@Gkirby001]

A fantastic video essay on a truly wonderful movie. I'll look forward to watching more of your work. Excellent.

[@sng3939]

It was a bold move of them to kill him off but it was the perfect ending to his arc imo. A great story from Casino Royale to NTTD.

[@IncPoint]

No Time To Die won Madeline over for me. The best Bond girl. Great finale. Only flaw was the villain

[@kylechappell806]

Personally I think vesper is what really made Daniel Craig James Bond an amazing character more then Madeline

[@IncPoint]

@@kylechappell806 agreed 100%. But in terms of who is more compelling rn its prob Madeline.

[@JuanVasquez-ph8be]

@@kylechappell806 more like vespers betrayal made bond who he is

[@skywalkerlad2907]

Phenomenal these are some of my favourite videos on KZbin honestly your the man! Somehow you’ve made the film even better for me!! Thanks dude

[@samhaskins2506]

Totally agree, the role Lea played totally made the film memorable. Thank you for a well balanced review

[@srb-ef3zs]

6:30. My heart skips a beat every time I see Monica B. Cameraman probably loved it too as she walked towards him.

[@DavidMorales-vw4tg]

While I don’t exactly agree with all the elements of your analysis of this film, primarily in the writing choices of this particular film, I definitely appreciate the effort and a different perspective. I want to give this film a second viewing now.

[@LeonWick526]

@William Guzman Damn right that's why people chose not to view (including me) and with great cause. No matter how dark/emotional a Bond film gets, we always count on Bond living in the end because he's an escapist character and not a tragic one. This film turns Bond into just another action hero if not less than that.

[@LeonWick526]

@William Guzman Don't rely on me about our desires to escape. You can ask a whole theatre full of people in England who booed and threw their popcorn and drinks at the screen when Bond bites the dust. Bond was an invincible legend in action cinema along with many other action heroes. Now he is less than that. A lot of Bond fans won't be able to have as much fun when watching a new Bond film again.

[@gleave9]

@@LeonWick526 you’re full of it 😂 I was in a full cinema in England and not a single boo. And instead a few tears from the emotion of the flick. Funny how you say you didn’t watch it yet you’re in a cinema of people reacting negatively to the film🤔. Go troll somewhere else mate and keep on enjoying the disney movies you clearly like the template of 😉

[@LeonWick526]

@@gleave9I never said I was in the cinema. kzbin.info/www/bejne/hKjLn3l_iZp6nNE kzbin.info/www/bejne/mWGspoeMe7yBmq8

[@JD-jz5gu]

@@LeonWick526 wah wah bond died, movie bad now. Get over yourself

[@johnandersen6752]

I think "The Prisoner" expressed many of these ideas more than half a century ago now. Doing a break down of it and its predecessor "Danger Man," AKA "Secret Agent," would be very interesting.

[@brentulstad3275]

Have you done a Layer Cake video? Most likely the film that set Daniel Craig up to be viewed as a potential James Bond, also a complex and interesting crime thriller with philosophical existentialist theory woven through. Not necessarily a crowd pleaser that every Bond fan would enjoy but for fans of Guy Ritchie and Matthew Vaughn a lesser known but great gem.

[@FilmSpeak]

I love Layer Cake! Could be a fun video to tackle down the line.

[@master-of-mind5881]

I loved the ending I thought it was a fitting end to the Daniel Craig era of bond films. What distinguishes these films from the others is the narrative. From quantum to NTTD, each film serves as a sequel, a direct continuation of the previous chapter hence why we have reoccurring characters, themes and subplots making the series it’s own distinctive universe, separate from any other iteration of the character. It’s within this context that the death of bond is justified. Daniel Craig’s bond made the character more tangible, adding emotional complexities and nuanced motifs to the role not quite seen before. The character of bond is renowned for his misogyny, detached demeanour, dry sense of humour, and abrasive tactics however we’ve seen this countless times over the decades. Craig’s bond was conceived to subvert the boundaries in narrative and character development. Each film puts the titular hero in a predicament, forcing him to constantly adjust his morals and principals. Each film helped elevate the character to new heights, replenishing any flaws in his armour. This was a thinking man’s bond, a man who was born to kill hearts but spends his whole life missing his own. His death is foreshadowed throughout the film so it doesn’t come off as a radical tactic made to provoke shock value. It comes off as earnest, Craig has played the role with much finesse over his 15 year tenure, at first he was just another actor playing bond. Now bond is embedded in his DNA. He is bond. He plays the character so well ageing like fine wine, exuding much maturity in such an iconic role, that has been played many times before. A good story requires a finite conclusion where everything is wrapped up with a bow, leaving no stone unturned. Bond fell in love again, he discovers he is a father and after a life of endless missions resulting in countless kills, he realises the beauty in preserving life, even at the cost of his own. Like safin said -“the whole point of life is to leave soemthing behind.” The set up for this was sufficient in that he had this history with Madeline, who was the catalyst for his poignant death. Only in death do we learn the true value of life. If they were ever going to kill off bond this was the best way to do it. With a build up, over several movies that developed the character, making him more relatable, more palatable, so that when the big moment comes, you actually really feel it. Daniel Craig has worked his ass off to entertain and deliver a unique take on the role, maintaining an opinion is fine, but just be grateful for all the hard work that he put in just for us. It’s not the conclusion we deserved but the one we needed…

[@BLACKHOLE498]

This was such a fitting yet gut wrenching end to Daniel Craig as James Bond. Thank you Daniel. You ABSOLUTELY are the GREATEST James Bond...

[@MostLikelyMortal]

When he gave his speech to Madeline in Norway, I had to check my ticket stub to make sure I was still watching a Bond movie because OMG it was a beautiful display of non-toxic masculinity. I had watched GoldenEye the night before and was honestly sickened by how gross Bond was toward women and everyone in general. For Craig to be that vulnerable and put his whole self in front of the woman he genuinely loves in that moment convinced me that this evolution of Bond is the quintessential character study and conclusion that is 50 years overdue.

[@UGeniuss.]

U do known they were forced to get rid of masculinity and the "use of women" because feminasts ruined bond thats why no time to die sucks

[@MostLikelyMortal]

@@UGeniuss. what a beautifully stale take.

[@UGeniuss.]

@@MostLikelyMortal lol

[@YungBeezer]

"because OMG it was a beautiful display of non-toxic masculinity." I really wish women would stop commenting or pushing their idea of masculinity.

[@MostLikelyMortal]

@@YungBeezer I’m fully a man but okay

[@the21stsergeant]

This should have been the end-all, be-all of the James Bond character. At least for a generation. Any reboot in the next 10 years will be 5-10 years too soon.

[@CrazyChemistPL]

Having grown with Moore, Connery, Dalton and Brosnan Bonds I cannot disgree more. If this was really to be the final Bond movie, it should've ended ambigiously. I really see no reason for this recent trend of killing all my childhood heroes (Han Solo, Luke Skywalker, Leia now Bond). Especially since we are talking about a character that has worn many faces across decades. I think groundwork for next movie in the series should start as soon as possible and I even have a perfect idea for it. A reimagining of The Man With The Golden Gun. James Bond versus the best hitman in the world, a cat and mouse game between the two, culminating in a gentleman duel, either set in the 60s-70s or brought forward to present day.

[@ALBHOY66]

really enjoyed that Griffin , beautifully edited and thoughtful , it's a pity that some people can't accept Daniel Craig's era as it's own timeline , not influenced by what came before and wont influence what comes after , people don't seem to have a problem with accepting the different Batman or Spiderman timelines and the Daniel Craig era shouldn't influence how anyone feels about the Bond films that came before or will come , personally i can't stand Roger Moore's Bond or his films , i just simply skip them , no big deal , personally I've really enjoyed Daniels era , i think they will struggle to find someone to replace him , very big shoes to fill , cheers buddy

[@melisagalvalizi6982]

I agree, they will struggle. They should let it rest.

[@dlama3698]

Your reviews are very insightful and eloquent. These Bond films have truly changed the franchise. I thought the same when watching the Christopher Nolan Batman movies and unfortunately that did not last. So I really hope that they don’t screw things up with the reboot.

[@metersreviews]

Fantastic analysis on NTTD man! Loved every minute of the film, as well as the video!

[@andrewjohnson8288]

I loved this movie so much. Daniel Craig is my favorite James Bond so I was happy that his final film was a hit. I saw the movie opening night and went and saw it again last weekend and the second time it was just as good as the first time I saw it. I will admit that I did cry at the end both times I watched it. Both this movie and Skyfall were great movies but I think this movie edges out because of Han Zimmer’s score which I think is one of the best scores I have heard in a while. The call backs to On her majesty’s secret service made me love this movie even more.

[@togp3403]

Great video, I feel like with all of this, Bond didn’t *need* to die, he could’ve learned all of this and overcame his struggles with himself and Vesper while still being able to escape it all. In fact, I feel like he deserves it. It’s the only reason it wasn’t satisfying, although I wish to find satisfaction in the ending, I can’t.

[@TykoBrian7]

People like bond won't get to die in their beds.

[@TheQuietReader1920]

Wonderful video--I really loved this film. The ending rattled me thoroughly but I've come to appreciate it more and more as I reflect on it. I didn't think Skyfall could be bested as my favourited Craig film, but NTTD certainly has done that. I can't wait to see it again some day!

[@MichaelOdendaal]

Loved this movie so much! Watching it with a packed cinema was such a great experience. Thank you for making this video.

[@damnedseagull6194]

Regarding the evaluation of No Time to Die, the finale of Daniel Craig’s James Bond, and most importantly Craig as Bond, you’ve nailed it. Thank you.

[@felipecorpuz2476]

When Safin revealed what he put on Bond during the last fight... It broke my heart, I knew immediately what it meant.

[@randallrutherford1384]

In 2006, I became a James Bond fan. I had seen bits and pieces of many of the films over the years with my Dad but I knew immediately that casino Royale was perfect! Now I love all of the films! All of the actors!

[@theseageek]

The character development was what made this movie stand out amongst the other Bond films.

[@PeterZeeke]

Damn bro that was amazingly well put

[@eddybaro7170]

This was an amazing film. It was a spectacular 007 movie - mean a James Bond movie. It’s amazing that Daniel Craig got the movie that he always wanted to do - get into the depth of the character.

[@lukekersten3421]

Beautiful video my friend, I will miss Daniel Craig in the world of Bond. Can't wait to see what's next

[@PeterZeeke]

All great stuff as you seem to come up with time and again. Also great reading on why Safin lets the girl go. As opposed to just saying "that was dumb" like so many others

[@999135f8]

I clicked this video because I thought it was going to be a sarcastic review. But your actual serious. This is troubling.

[@danwil6472]

I absolutely agree with you. Great video👏

[@umairzia4030]

An absolutely phenomenal video essay. I watch al of yours. Keep it up. Hoping you can do one on American Beauty, The Prestige, Arrival, Blade Runner 2049, and Zodiac. This was a solid move and great ending to Craig Era.

[@brandontran4180]

Really glad to see that more people are posting videos that they liked No Time to Die. I really loved this film!! Yes, it's not perfect. However, this film gave Craig's Bond the proper sendoff and finally breaking the last Bond film curse

[@Rob_-dv6ei]

I didn’t realise it was so inspired by Fleming’s work, that’s fascinating - I really loved the film but I will say I thought her ending line of “let me tell you a story” was so, so corny it almost tainted the film.

[@MsTriangle]

That movie had MANY corny moments

[@MrMrjack18]

Another great video ! bravo ! Despite some flaws NTTD ending was amazing, sad ending but amazing send of to Daniel.

[@nicksey4750]

best creator on YT!

[@FilmSpeak]

Aw thank you so much!

[@jordanmaiden0073]

Wonderfully well done video. I couldn’t agree more. I had a feeling this movie was gonna rank number 2 behind Casino Royale for Craig’s movies and my prediction was correct. A beautiful send off for Craig.

[@jimlittle5769]

I have it 3rd, but I think Casino Royale and Skyfall are the best Bond movies ever, so...

[@darielserrano4594]

Dude your spot on! Great job with this video.

[@lionheart4424]

I was not a fan of Craig as Bond. Now I love him and I am thankful he gave his all to the character. NTTD is amazing and no wonder why Lea gets so emotional about the film and Craig's departure.

[@WillyRantsAndReviews]

What a well made video and breakdown. Bravo!

[@Tourist1967]

Sean Connery was the best Bond. Daniel Craig was the best actor who ever played Bond. By a whisker.

[@bcfairlie1]

Just just saw NTTD tonight. I think it is a very very good movie. It definitely gave Craig more indepth work to do. Which he deserves and needed to be able to do in order to finish his Bond. It is a balanced movie, unlike the train wreck that was "Spectra ". It clears the story and allows a new direction for the franchise. Daniel Craig was a great Bond. He will be a hard act to follow. However this film clears the screen. And a new direction can happen. Yet if a woman takes over the role I will never watch a Bond movie ever again. I'm not sexist at all. But if you redo the actual character as a female then you should want to see superman played by an Asian dwarf with torrents syndrome. Then tell me how that relates to the actual original written character.

[@ultramarsfinest1536]

It was a bittersweet ending, deep down inside we all ought to know that the story must end somewhere one day. Wouldn't have it end any other way, we had a really good run. *a toast for the Daniel Craig saga

[@Tommuli_Haudankaivaja]

After a few videos, I am convinced that you deserve way more viewers.

[@carlosfreitas6434]

for me Sean conery is the definitive bond but Craig redefined what james bond can be.

[@wildresin6292]

This has to be my favourite both Craig and Bond film.

[@exeggutivejudge3747]

Ain't nothin beatin Casino Royale brotha

[@nunouno001]

Honestly, aside from Quantum of Solace, although I understand the role it plays in the greater Craig Bond arc. I thoroughly enjoyed and adored all of Daniel Craig’s role as Bond that even if we never get another James Bond, I’ll be happy and satisfied with all the time we spent with Craig and James Bond.

[@jordandoronila9490]

What an insightful analysis. The best about NTTD around thus far. Thank you!

[@jeffj3355]

This is one of the best most emotionally draining satisfying Bond films ever. On one level, it's what Majesty's Secret Service tried to be, but failed. Someone in a book I read said if Sean Connery had been in Majesty's holding diana rigg at the end, with louis armstrong's song would have left the audience without a dry eye in the house. So the filmmakers said with No Time To Die, they were inspired emotionally by Majesty's. Some hated it because it was a deeper story than the roger or pierce fluffish bonds. But then bond movies also reflect their time and the world. Mr. Craig's bond was set in a grey world not black and white. What's interesting is, whichever actor played bond the first time you saw a bond movie, that was "your" Bond always and forever. I saw Connery's bond in the movie theaters when i was a kid, the first one i remember seriously was diamonds are forever, and yeah that was good. Mr. Craig's bond took the movie bond further deeper than ever before. He will be missed, but the parlor game of who will be the next bond is dominating the internet. When Mr. Craig was picked, the internet wasn't as wide and yeah the choice was ridiculed summed up with the name JAMES BLONDE... you wonder if the people who posted that regret it. My point? you can speculate all you want who will be the next bond, and I will put money down on it, the next bond will not be someone mentioned today last month or next month, and trust Mr. Wilson and Ms. Broccoli, they will make the next actor chosen to be the right one chosen for the next series of Bond films...

[@tyjuanconnell5791]

Outstanding breakdown one thing people don’t really think about is that all of Craig’s movies basically take place in real time the gaps in between each film are basically written into each movie if you pay attention when it’s all said and done people will respect Craig’s time and everything he gave to the role because he gave his blood sweat and tears.

[@Rocket1377]

Interesting theory, but no. That doesn't explain why Bond starts Casino Royale as a newly appointed 00 Agent, and by Skyfall his bosses are already talking about how over the hill he is. Plus how much Bond ages over the course of the series.

[@tyjuanconnell5791]

@@Rocket1377 craig was 37 going on 38 when he got the role in the novel bond is 38 when he gets his license to kill the time in between quantum and skyfall is 4 years in that 4 years bond has many adventures in between those movies we just haven’t seen them skyfall came out in 2012 Craig was 44 in the third Fleming novel Moonraker I believe bond is in his early 40’s unfortunately as great as the older movies are they spoiled us on the fact bond is a immortal character who can’t die and that was never how it was supposed to be we see in the first few minutes in skyfall he argues with m about saving another agent and m has to order him to leave that small moment let’s us know as a audience that he is more mature and that he thinks before he acts unlike the first 2 movies has the writing always been good in these movies no but if we take Craig’s 15 years in the role as 15 years of bonds life you’ll understand what they were trying to do with character.

[@johnwhite3015]

Daniel Craig has bought excitement emotion energy and tenderness to the bond franchise he will be sorely missed by all barn fans around the world.

[@SmashBroRazz]

Alright, well done. You’ve made me feel much warmer toward this film than I would have thought possible.

[@snokuy]

Great work on this. I thought this movie beautiful and smart on the surface, but you help us dive into the complex themes. Also, thx for mentioning the ties to You Only Live Twice. Another connection: I believe that book also involves a poison garden in an island castle off the coast of Japan.

[@mariaquill]

My ranking of the Craig films 1. Skyfall 2. Casino Royale 3. No Time to Die 4. Spectre 5. Quantum of Solace

[@ShalomEntirety1]

Awww...So Good!!! Thank you. Gutted at the ending ESPECIALLY because where we are as a world... DC A:LWAYS be the BEST Grittiest badass built as BOND!!!

[@crazyshit1985]

I loved that after a long time It felt bond was in real danger during the Matera chase and the thrilling car chase in the forest. Well we know he will win but the stakes were higher due to his "Family" . The end set piece where he takes on a whole island of fighters was a bit over the top and the villain's motivations were not well defined . Overall I enjoyed it and feel it will be very much re-watchable like Casino Royale.

[@charlesreid9337]

youre a bond fan and.. shocked that evil villains are evil and that the movies are over the top?