I built an lcr meter over 20 years ago and fond it invalueable for tv repairs. I added a couple of diodes across the probes to make sure capacitors were discharged to save destroying the meter if i forgot to discharged one before testing. I also built a really sensitive resistance tester that could measure the resistance of a trace or wire which came is really handy for tracing short cicuits, I could litterally just follow the lowest resistance to ground to the faulty component with out cutting tracks etc.
@Tony359_23 ай бұрын
Good tools are always valuable over time! Thanks for watching!
@uki3522 ай бұрын
Hehe, these diodes were shot at my 4263B when I got it, together with an evaporated trace and an exploded through-hole and partly evaporated inner layer ground plane. Looks like someone teste either in a running unit or forgot to discharge some really big cap or even a bank of caps. 4 input protection diodes short, two chip resistors blown and some 74HC series logic chip vented some smoke. Putting some fast and big Zener diodes across the inputs is important. But other than the 4263B the ZT-MD1 does probably not need a calibration after adding / changing the input protection to cover the parasitic capacity of the diodes.
@IanScottJohnston3 ай бұрын
ESR meters have 100Hz, 10kHz and 100kHz modes so you can test your capacitor near it's intended use frequency: 100/120 Hz: Power-line frequencies (50/60 Hz) or low-frequency circuits. 10 kHz: Represents mid-range frequencies, which might be found in audio circuits or lower-frequency switching power supplies. 100 kHz: Simulates high-frequency scenarios, such as switching power supplies or RF circuits, where capacitors are exposed to high-speed signals. PS. Remember to short the capacitor leads out before testing a cap.
@Tony359_23 ай бұрын
Thanks! 100KHz would have been great but I am happy with the 100/1000/10KHz options! :)
@tedgustafson80603 ай бұрын
The the@@Tony359_2
@bfx81853 ай бұрын
I don't know guys why none of you who tested those LCR meters mention one important fact. Every capacitor have a datasheet where is information about ESR and also for which frequency is that ESR valid. For most of the electrolytic caps it's 120 Hz. That's why professional LCR meters have this frequency in their range.
@Tony359_23 ай бұрын
I don't know what capacitors you use. None of my Panasonic and Nichicon mention the ESR in the datasheets. The only THREE capacitors I have which have ESR mentioned are the WURTH and it's measured at 100KHz :)
@bfx81853 ай бұрын
@@Tony359_2 because sometimes they use tan δ and ESR could be calculated from this number. The tangent of the loss angle is usually provided, which actually simplifies things a bit. Taking the formula for the impedance of an ideal capacitor and doing a bit of algebra, one finds that an ESR value can be obtained by dividing that value from the datasheet by two pi, the test frequency, and the capacitor value.
@jonathanwhiteside60923 ай бұрын
Nice little honest video, I've just ordered one of these based on your review :)
@Tony359_23 ай бұрын
Thanks! I hope you like it! :)
@chuckgilly2 ай бұрын
I just ordered 2 from eBay
@greggismyname2 ай бұрын
Thank you... I was curious about this model. I appreciate your work on this!
@Tony359_22 ай бұрын
You're very welcome!
@yannis92preloudeАй бұрын
I managed to get myself one of these, the price is very good and I was quite impressed with how accurate it is at low values.
@detalite3 ай бұрын
I have one. It's quite accurate at low values. I measured 0,002 ohm shunt resistor and result was 0,0019 ohm, and 0,5uH inductor measurment result 0,6 uH. In the case of capacity, the measurements seem to be very accurate at least to a value of 47 uF, but still results with 10000uF capacitors are within tolerance. I don't like that jog swich fin Frinsi, it's prone to jamming. Switches in Zoyi are better for me, but i think that default frequency value should be 100 Hz.
@Tony359_23 ай бұрын
Yes, it would be nice if defaults could be set!
@Little_Lancey3 ай бұрын
aaaawe, Thank you! I've been looking for an affordable tool like this one for so long
@Tony359_23 ай бұрын
Me too! For once I am impressed!
@averagegigachad7952 ай бұрын
I bought one after watching this video and I'm loving it
@Tony359_22 ай бұрын
Thanks for letting me know - I don't want to advertise bad tools so I am super happy you love it!
@llee42253 ай бұрын
I was debating if I should spend time watching this video but very happy I did! I have a low cost LRC meter but it doesn't have have the features of this one. For such a small device and be able to select the freq and to show the resistance together with the L and C is fabulous!
@Tony359_23 ай бұрын
I'm glad that you liked it - I was genuinely impressed but it, I wasn't really planning this video! Thanks for watching!
@osliverpool3 ай бұрын
That's cheaper than some of the capacitors I need to test! Ordering one, thanks!
@Tony359_23 ай бұрын
ahah yes!
@movax20h3 ай бұрын
The 0.01Ω is handy for hunting shorted capacitors, and in general shorts on big boards. (It does not even need to be that accurate, as long it is not too noisy). The Capacitors and ESR at different frequencies also very handy.
@Tony359_23 ай бұрын
ah yes, I forgot to mention the milli-ohm reading which I don't have anywhere else!
@acestudioscouk-Ace-G0ACE3 ай бұрын
A useful tool and thanks for the honest review. Regarding the misaligned tweezer tips... you may find that if you loosen the screws holding the tips, you may be able to adjust their alignment a little.
@Tony359_23 ай бұрын
Thanks - someone else mentioned that, I'll give it a go!
@G1ZQCArtwork3 ай бұрын
In the old days when things were simpler, we first "formed" the Electrolytic using stepped voltages, them we timed how long it would hold a charge. ESR was not a thing. I now use high frequency Capacitors in various Buck or Boost converters. which get warm or even hot in operation, back in the old days of Valve gear, if the Caps got warm, we knew they were leaking and time to change them. Interesting thanks, from an old School Electronics hobbyist and long time Radio Amateur Radio Operator. 73 G1ZQC.
@Tony359_23 ай бұрын
Sounds very cool thank you!
@barnowl68072 ай бұрын
I have designed many switching supplies and found very early in the game that the type of dielectric is critical. X7R is the minimum for reasonable power loss. COG would be best, but the size and especially cost may be prohibitive. Most don't know that some dielectrics, like Z5U will loose over half their value when hot. The ESR may also change. These drastic value changes can cause the feedback loop to become unstable, and are quite possibly the reason for wild regulation changes and smokey failure.
@mc_cpu3 ай бұрын
Wow KZbin actually recommended your video. 😉 good luck!
@Tony359_23 ай бұрын
Thank you!! 😁
@jacktheripper67163 ай бұрын
I love my zt-md1 got one after defpom video mine got mine from aliexpress for 16gbp at the time
@vhm14u2c3 ай бұрын
Thanks for sharing information about device, I bought one afterwards.
@Tony359_23 ай бұрын
You're welcome!
@joonglegamer98983 ай бұрын
I love it, bought it, thanks for the tip!
@TheDefpom3 ай бұрын
Yep the tweezer is certainly a handy tool and is great for the price.
@Tony359_23 ай бұрын
Thanks for testing it - I was about to refuse it! :)
@brucettha2 ай бұрын
Affordable and accurate LCR meters like this are a game-changer for hobbyists and professionals alike. Having a reliable tool at a lower price point makes component testing and circuit troubleshooting accessible to a broader audience. It’s great to see innovation in functionality without compromising budget-friendly options. Tools like these encourage more people to explore electronics and build their skills! I came across GAO RFID Inc. you might find it pretty useful for this topic!
@Tony359_22 ай бұрын
Thanks for watching!
@K10driver3 ай бұрын
Very nice review, I had to laugh some time :) Its a good thing for some DIY'ers - because of a missing LCR-Meter I will buy it! Thanks
@Tony359_23 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@noads103524 күн бұрын
Thanks for this!
@ralvarezb7821 күн бұрын
thank you for this review, I bougth after view your video. Hope this handy tool helps me
@Tony359_220 күн бұрын
I hope you like it! :)
@peekpt3 ай бұрын
The ESR is measured by the voltage difference of a signal passing a capacitor. You need a constant current and constant frequency to be able to measure accurate values. There's also not an ideal cap. each cap. , has a frequency range . The lower cap you go you have to raise freq.
@jimparr01UtubeАй бұрын
Cute gadget. Thanks for the video Sir.
@Tony359_2Ай бұрын
You're welcome!
@NotMarkKnopfler3 ай бұрын
Thanks. Great review and great device. On the strength of your review I just bought one. Cost me £22.79 shipped to the UK from AliExpress. 👍
@Tony359_23 ай бұрын
I should have asked for commissions :) I hope you like it and thanks for watching!
@joonglegamer98982 ай бұрын
I just received mine, and I think they may have listened to your critique, I ordered from your links and mine came with improvements. It's spot on aligned. It's a lot less flexible (doesn't wiggle much to the sides). They've also changed the colors of the buttons (now black instead of grey, not sure that was an improvement, but the text is more readable). The display is extremely crisp and can be seen from all angles. The included cable is actually nice instead of those cheap dinky cables they always include with low-priced items.
@Tony359_22 ай бұрын
ahah amazing, I'm glad you are positively impressed!
@ZAPATTUBE6 күн бұрын
Thank you.
@Graham_Wideman3 ай бұрын
Perhaps it's obvious to viewers, but in case not -- the main point of tweezer style meters is that they can conveniently grip and measure smd components. For that purpose they are much better than a conventional LCR meter with probes (assuming they meet accuracy requirements).
@Tony359_23 ай бұрын
Ah yes, of course. This is great for measuring SMD stuff. But I find it simpler for Through Hole as well. Measuring a capacitor with probes needs some dexterity :) Thanks for your comment!
@Graham_Wideman3 ай бұрын
@Tony359_2 well, i agree that the probes on a conventional meter require some dexterity for through-hole parts. But you can exchange the probes for clip leads and those are quite handy to use.
@Tony359_23 ай бұрын
there is no right and wrong of course.
@Graham_Wideman3 ай бұрын
@@Tony359_2 Agreed! Just some things that can make life easier!
@allanknox82162 ай бұрын
It looks better than the Smart Tweezers product from some years back. I'd love to see a side by side.
@joewoodchuck38243 ай бұрын
Two points not covered are: A. The atmel tester has the built in component lead holder which also allows for using the included test lead clips. Once the component is attached by either method it's a hands free device. B. The screen shows all test parameters simultaneously, while the probe style unit needs to have the mode changed in order to see the test result of each.
@Tony359_23 ай бұрын
Yes, they are two approaches of course. The Zoyi is an LCR meter, the component tester is... a component tester! :) Each does things the other can't so it's nice to have both!
@joewoodchuck38243 ай бұрын
@@Tony359_2 The component tester does measure inductors.
@Tony359_23 ай бұрын
I know - but it's not an LCR meter. It doesn't use different frequencies like an LCR meter does, I showed that on the FNIRSI video. Otherwise LCR meters wouldn't exist! :)
@BrianG61UK3 сағат бұрын
The AC impedance of 1μF at 100Hz is quite high (about 1.5kΩ I think). It may be difficult for the MD1 to accurately judge how much of the total impedance is due to the internal resistance rather than just to the 1μF capacitance. Once you realise the total impedance at 100Hz is that high, it becomes obvious that what seemed to be a high series resistance at 100Hz is actually more than good enough at 100Hz as long as it does get lower at higher frequencies.
@RetroDilna3 күн бұрын
Tak jsem si to koupil a napíšu zde SVÉ postřehy, pro případné zájemce. Ať si každý posoudí a zváží sám. Mám několik let starý přístroj něco jako Mastech MS8910, ten jsem chtěl poslat do důchodu a nechat si novinku. V průběhu testu jsem dospěl k závěru, že si je bohužel musím nechat oba a na konci testu... prodávám a nechávám si starý. Takže (v porovnání x let se starou klasikou): 1. hroty krátké, tupé 2. pískací test tragédie, sem tam ano, sem tam ne, očištěn hrotů pomohlo o 50%. Na čisté mědi ano, ale na jiných površích... 3. ramena kratší, s větším odporem, po více měřeních malých součástek to cítíte v prstech 4. test LED - zapomeňte ! 5. test Zenerek v propustném směru - zapomeňte ! 6. test např. led v BC817 - zapomeňte ! 7. ESR - měří třetí hodnotu ze tří měřáků, takže nelze posoudit, navíc mi stále klesá při jedné součástce 8. měření odporu např. cívky relé - zapomeňte - vzhledem k AC měření měří uplné bludy resp. impedanci, ne odpor 9. rychlost měření R - tragédie, oproti starému typu absolutně nesrovnatelné, chvíli nevíte, jestli se hodnota ještě změní či ne nebo jestli se sekl... 10. měří na desetiny mOhmu, ale spolehnout se se na hodnotu okolo 10mOhm nejde, jednou 3mO, jednou 15... Pozitiva : 1. design 2. display 3. rozpoznání směru diody 4. ESR, snad... 5. tvrdé pouzdro 6. snad interní baterie, ale v MS mám knoflíkovou už 5 let... Nezabýval jsem se vůbec měřením indukčnosti, takže nehodnotím. Za mně krok zpět a nestojí za 600 Kč (pozitiva kromě bodu 3 jsou technikovi k ničemu) resp. stál by, pokud by se dalo testovat i DC proudem a testovací napětí by bylo možno přepnout nad 2V jako u MS, kt. změří vše :-( To je za mne, mám to hodinu, třeba jsem něco přehlédl a změním názor.
@SobieRobie3 ай бұрын
Good job, you just solid one!
@Tony359_23 ай бұрын
Thanks!
@RickDkkrd3 ай бұрын
It's better to take the tips off and bend them inwards for more ease of use and less strain on the legs which are made of the pcb material. Thanks for the fw update heads up.
@Tony359_23 ай бұрын
You're welcome!
@Constantin3143 ай бұрын
this is a very nice tool for a beginner, Tony
@Tony359_23 ай бұрын
Indeed!
@uki3522 ай бұрын
Interesting thing! I did repair my HP Agilent 4263B LCR bridge with what I was ripped off at eBay. But this 4263 is a shelf unit, needing long Celvin cables or the part has to be removed and placed into a test jig. With this handy tool you can do some pre-checking in circuit and at least know if there is a further investigation needed. Even having R&S meters at hand, I often prefer some smaller movable equipment as often the thing to repair is in the view of the bench top equipment in front of you. But all the older Chinese super handy stuff just works for a year and then you have replaced the LiIon Pack the third time. And it is always empty when you want to use it. So, for me this ZT-MD1 looks promising, and I'll order one. Thanks for showing that around!
@Tony359_22 ай бұрын
Indeed - nice to have a proper one but this is good for most of the task. The battery lasts FOREVER! It's still reading full and I charged it after the video!
@uki3522 ай бұрын
@@Tony359_2 I already added it to the Aliexpress shopping list. And I agree, far better to accidentally kill a 16€ China tool and still have a 1500€ precision meter for filter measurements. Really looking forward to test that thing myself.
@snakezdewiggle60843 ай бұрын
G'day Tony. Great video as usual.👍 For me, the Best Tool for the job, is the one in your hand. The Worst Tool in the shop, is the one covered in dust.
@Tony359_23 ай бұрын
eheh absolutely! That's why I decided to make this video, I could see this tool in my hands very often :)
@snakezdewiggle60843 ай бұрын
Yeah, after your video, Im thinkin' of getting one myself . The price is right. Well, the Sun has just popped up, must be time to put the kettle on. Cheerz.
@creamshop2 ай бұрын
Thank you, just bought one!
@Tony359_22 ай бұрын
Hope you enjoy it!
@markrobinson78313 ай бұрын
Good review. I am going to order.
@Tony359_23 ай бұрын
I hope you like it!
@tonywoolf50423 ай бұрын
Seems it displays mH for microhenries. That means millihenries. It always makes me wonder when an instrument uses the wrong units, how careful have they been in other things? OK, it's hard to display the Greek "mu" but it's common to use a lower case u for that - there is no confusing uH with millihenries.
@Tony359_23 ай бұрын
I always mix up milli with micro!
@tonywoolf50423 ай бұрын
So, what was on the label of the component, mH or μH?
@Tony359_23 ай бұрын
mH
@tonywoolf50423 ай бұрын
Thanks. In that case I might buy one.
@stoptheirlies3 ай бұрын
Nice one Tony, Actually, I watched a couple of vids where it was compared to some expensive meters and it was very accurate. Bob
@Tony359_23 ай бұрын
indeed, Scott's video is one of them!
@minombredepila15803 ай бұрын
Thanks for the video Tony. At the end, we need a tool to make the job with some margin of error, and this one seems to make the job. We're not repairing the space station here 😉
@Tony359_23 ай бұрын
Exactly! The DE-5000 might have some more features and be more accurate but this seems to be accurate enough. The ATMEL is also accurate enough though it lacks the frequency selection. For £17, this is good! I wasn't expecting it! Thank you!
@aleksandardjurovic92033 ай бұрын
Thank you. A great video.
@Tony359_23 ай бұрын
You are welcome!
@kychemclass58502 ай бұрын
Nice. May I suggest you do a review on USB cable testers (max data speed and PD ability)?
@Tony359_22 ай бұрын
Thanks! I do have one, I never thought of reviewing it.
@Milosz_Ostrow3 ай бұрын
The ZT-MD1 is also offered on Ali Express for 10%-25% more than the Alibaba price.
@Tony359_23 ай бұрын
I was given Alibaba links as well but decided not to include them in the description. The Zoyi website has those links though, feel free to take a look. I don't get paid anyways :)
@pault65333 ай бұрын
Thanks! Your perspective is interesting. & letting us know v1.8 is available. They introduced data logging with v1.7, and the data file was missing the Rs column.
@Tony359_23 ай бұрын
Ah yes, this thing also has data logging :) You're very welcome, I stumbled on the FW by chance, I just wanted to make sure I was using the latest version on camera!
@StevenStyczinski-sy8cj2 ай бұрын
I believe that a component didn’t go BAD, but simply evolved into a different circuit. Every capacitor has capacitance, resistance and inductance and overtime it changed those characteristics into a different circuit. Now what that circuit is good for is is in the realm of the advertising department.
@macgvrsАй бұрын
I have a MESR 100 esr meter and it only does 100 hz. Had no idea that there were other options. Guess i will have to learn when to use other frequencies if I get this, or, even if I need to.
@Tony359_2Ай бұрын
100Hz is a good one - if a cap is bad, the ESR will deviate most at 100Hz.
@macgvrsАй бұрын
@@Tony359_2 That was what I thought. But, since there are other options, I was wondering what the value of them is. I guess, if you are using caps in high frequency circuits, you might want to test at higher frequencies?
@Tony359_2Ай бұрын
This is an amazing tool but still a basic tool. If you’re designing circuits where tolerances are strict, maybe a proper LCR meter would be more suitable. In my case, the 100hz reading is helpful because at 10khz a bad cap might show a slightly off ESR but at 100Hz the bad cap might show a much worse ESR.
@winstonsmith4783 ай бұрын
One would think that these microcontroller driven devices, both the one you're reviewing and the ZIF socket device, could AUTOMATICALLY do capacitor ESR tests at a range of frequencies and then display the results in a set sequence. Example 100Hz-10kHz-100kHz or whatever range would be most revealing. It would simply be a matter of properly programming the microcontroller to do this.
@Tony359_23 ай бұрын
That would take time though and a firm connection. It could be nice to have it as an option.
@GAK1atatt2 ай бұрын
And in many circuits where the impedance of the surrounding circuitry is orders of magnitude higher than the ESR high ESR my have no effect on the circuit. Ex: 1md cap with 45 ohms ESR into a 10K load resistor, common in many audio circuits, will have the effect of a 25 ohm resistor in series with a good 1mfd cap. The loss will be negligible. But the cap may cause distortion depending on the nature of the ESR. FYI
@Tony359_22 ай бұрын
Thanks!
@Snowsea-gs4wu3 ай бұрын
At 3:56 I think you meant 100Khz not Hertz. Thanks for the video!
@Snowsea-gs4wu3 ай бұрын
So... You actually meant 100 Hz. You should check MESR-100 V2, that one can check 100Khz and it's quite cheap as well!
@Tony359_23 ай бұрын
I am not 100% up to date with what's available on the market, it's nice to know that finally we're getting affordable "actual" LCR meters! Thank you!
@F4LDT-Alain2 ай бұрын
Naive question : I build antennas for ham radio. Some antennas need loading inductors to shorten the radials. Would such a cheap tester be suitable to test my home-made inductors (wire turns around a PVC tube) against the desired inductance? These antennas operate in the 7-28 Mhz range.
@Tony359_22 ай бұрын
I do not know to be honest, sorry! What is the expected value of the inductors?
@F4LDT-Alain2 ай бұрын
I just checked and e.g. for a shortened end-fed half-wave antenna tuned for up to 80m band, the loading inductor needs to be 110 uH I was also thinking about the issue of testing at frequencies that are way below what the antenna gets.
@ville_syrjala3 ай бұрын
Does it look possible to take it apart in a non-destructive manner, or was it designed to become ewaste once the battery dies?
@Tony359_23 ай бұрын
I haven't checked to be honest.
@RickDkkrd3 ай бұрын
yes, there's a single screw on the back and a lipo battery inside that can be swapped easily
@abusam12 ай бұрын
thank you Tony for the review, LCR-ST1 (some online stores listed as having LCR & ESR like FINIRSI) did you get the chance to test on-board capcitor with it?
@Tony359_22 ай бұрын
I understand the zoyi is not great at testing in circuit capacitors but I did try a few times and I got some useful info. Apparently the Peak is a better tool for that.
@coderhex167517 күн бұрын
if this tool can plot arbitrary frequency vs Rs, this would be in my shoppping list
@McSlobo16 күн бұрын
If you measure capacitance you certaily use a some sort of of AC, not wizardry. Is it a pulse, sine or square wave, does it matter? Non-sines just have some "overtones" included. What is the intended use of the capacitor - digest sines or squares or noise or some random signal, audio or microwaves? All capacitors have specs for rise times etc. in datasheets. If your measurement varies a lot depending on your test device/signal (which should correspond to your use case) then maybe it's not the capacitor for the job.
@Tony359_215 күн бұрын
Cheaper component testers don't use AC signals, check out my previous video where I briefly show how they work. kzbin.info/www/bejne/naCXdH6BgcaUebc
@Pickle1363 ай бұрын
thanks for highlighting this tool, FYI your link to defpom video is for the FNIRSI not the Zotek
@Tony359_23 ай бұрын
Thanks, I changed it many hours ago, it’s should good by now. Thanks for taking the time to let me know!
@IntenseGrid2 ай бұрын
Can you measure voltage with it, like in circuit voltage across a capacitor?
@Tony359_22 ай бұрын
No, no voltage unfortunately.
@norbertdapunt50922 ай бұрын
Awesome.
@Tony359_22 ай бұрын
Thanks!
@GAK1atatt2 ай бұрын
I just ordered one on watching this vid. However, you don't mention the expected impedance of the cap you're testing. Without it you don't really know what's what. In order to sort out the non reactive impedance or resistance from the ESR you need to know the impedance of the value you're testing. 1mfd has a Z of 15.9 ohms at 100 hz. If you don't know that then you you can't accurately judge the cap's esr. And if you get an esr below the actual impedance of that value cap's labeled rating then the capacitance will be higher than rated. Most electrolytics are +20 to 50% /-20% tolerance.
@Tony359_22 ай бұрын
Thanks for watching, I hope you like it! I still do! I didn't mention much because I feel I am not in a position to evaluate the accuracy of this tool - for that I mentioned the video review from Defpom, he's got professional LCR meters and he was able to do a comparison. I searched through all my capacitors and nobody is sharing the ESR on their datasheet. Only Wurth does but only at 100KHz, which this tool cannot do. In fact, I am sure I did find a Wurth with the ESR measured at 120Hz on the datasheet. I cannot find that capacitor anymore but it did match the Zoyi very closely. I hope you're happy with the tool, let me know! :)
@Yoyo-me3 ай бұрын
🤔 New acquisition... LCR Fnirsi dso-tc3... With signal generator and oscilloscope When have some time, I will test it, to see its performance. Bought it after seen a lot of feedbacks. Cheers.
@Tony359_23 ай бұрын
a-hm! :) kzbin.info/www/bejne/naCXdH6BgcaUebc
@SirWerner..2 ай бұрын
Micro Harry ? To me its micro Henry 😊 Nice instrument... tx!
@Tony359_22 ай бұрын
Oh well, plenty of English mistakes in my videos, pick your favourite one! :)
@Swenser3 ай бұрын
Why not include voltage and current readings? Why stop there...temperature and humidity? Noise level meter...etc
@Tony359_23 ай бұрын
In Italy we say "vuoi la botte piena e la moglie briaha" (you want the barrell still full of wine but your wife drunk) :)
@billferner67413 ай бұрын
It would be helpful if you would explain what a EST or a LCR is. At least in your "more..."
@Tony359_23 ай бұрын
Thanks for your feedback!
@gerhardmulder73122 ай бұрын
At 4.41 you measure inductance of 4 uH ( microHenry) but the display is showing 4 mH (milliHenry) ?
@Tony359_22 ай бұрын
My mistake, I meant millihenry!
@I_Don_t_want_a_handle3 ай бұрын
So, OK, you've tested all your caps ... how do you what the tolerances are? Is there a general rule or do you need each component's spec to check if it is OK? Asking for a friend ... 🤔
@Tony359_23 ай бұрын
Capacitor tolerance is 20% by design. For ESR, you can find tables online which give you an acceptable range depending on the capacitance. At higher capacitance you'd expect lower ESR, at lower capacitance you'd expect higher ESR. I hope this helps your friend! ;)
@I_Don_t_want_a_handle3 ай бұрын
@@Tony359_2 He says, thank you for your answer.
@Shaun.Stephens3 ай бұрын
No I don't NEED one! (I keep collecting things that I rarely use.) Thanks for the video.
@Tony359_23 ай бұрын
ahaha I can relate don't worry!!
@gregorybolin46722 ай бұрын
I saw this one doesnt work in circuit like the little more expensive competitors according to eevblog
@Tony359_22 ай бұрын
yes apparently it's not great but I'm not a lover of in-circuit measurements. that said when I tried, I got some meaningful information!
@gregorybolin46722 ай бұрын
@Tony359_2 I'll probably get one too see if I can snag one for 15 around Christmas 😀
@onesikm32 ай бұрын
Will this work for amp repair if I’m trying to check the capacitors without desoldering them off the board ?
@Tony359_22 ай бұрын
I’m told it’s not great for in circuit testing (though it does work to an extend). For that I understand the peak is better.
@G3PWP2 ай бұрын
Whats with the test screen that keeps popping up
@Tony359_22 ай бұрын
Test screen?
@j.w.8663Ай бұрын
Can the display screen flip for left-handers?
@Tony359_2Ай бұрын
yes it can! It's in the menu
@j.w.8663Ай бұрын
@Tony359_2 fantastic. Thank you.
@Сергей_БистяйкинАй бұрын
Очень ценная информация!
@Tony359_2Ай бұрын
Thank you!
@James_Bowie3 ай бұрын
Be VERY sure to discharge capacitors prior to measurement, otherwise you will end up with just another pair of tweezers.
@Tony359_23 ай бұрын
Always a good idea indeed. That's why I have two of those "Atmel based" testers - one has a hole on the main IC :)
@Sctronic2093 ай бұрын
Wouldn’t the auto feature protect you from that?
@Tony359_23 ай бұрын
Those testers - more expensive ones too - won't like a fully charged capacitor. A few volts is ok. But when I plugged my 220V motor start capacitor on an ATMEL-based tester, I made a hole in the IC :)
@namAlexander2 ай бұрын
Try the ESR2501C
@ScottSavageTechnoScavenger3 ай бұрын
How do I get you a SoundginZ? I would love for you to do a video on it.
@RickDkkrd3 ай бұрын
The link to the Defpom video in the description is the wrong one
@Tony359_23 ай бұрын
Thank you and my apologies - it's fixed not! :)
@Gelf543 ай бұрын
Do you think that perhaps it's displaying Impedance rather than ESR? ESR should increase with frequency in electrolytic capacitors due to poorer Ionic Conductivity, the Diffusion Layer, and the effect of higher temperatures over time. Your tests appear to just be showing simple impedance instead, hence higher values at lower frequency.
@Tony359_23 ай бұрын
My knowledge is limited but my understanding is that ESR increases when reducing frequency. You can find graphs online. That’s all I know 🙂
@WJV92 ай бұрын
@@Tony359_2 - It would be an interesting experiment to test a variety of capacitor types both electrolytic and non electrolytic. Also the design of cap would affect ESR testing I am sure, mica, mylar, tantalum, etc. From my experience with designing switching power supplies most electrolytic caps do have an increase in ESR with frequency and we would always design with 'low ESR' caps to limit heating of the caps in the power supply. Also when 'decoupling' TTL digital circuits we would often put an electrolytic cap in parallel with a mylar or other low ESR cap to get rid of high frequency noise from the switching circuits.
@jeffaulik39803 ай бұрын
Will it do in circuit capacitance tests?
@Tony359_23 ай бұрын
Not too accurately apparently. I am not a believer of that method so I didn't really check too much.
@Tech-Relief3 ай бұрын
I recently tested the new FNIRSI LCR-P1 and it also was totally useless and ended up in my junk drawer. The older TC1 and TC3 testers are much better than the others and do give a much closer ESR value to what my large LCR meters give. However, one comment; Capacitance of Electrolytics is usually done at 100 or 120 Hz but ESR is measured at 100KHz and that little meter does not seem to have that frequency so I presume it won't be accurate either?
@Tony359_23 ай бұрын
Oh yes, I also need one of those Drawers! :D 100KHz is often used to measure ESR on datasheets etc yes. So yes, it would be nice to have 100KHz as well. The ATMEL based testers approximate a 10KHz reading, I feel 10KHz is ok for DIY work - and 100Hz is a massive addition for troubleshooting purposes. On a good cap, 10KHz and 100KHz ESR should be very close so that doesn't concern me. I don't need anything super accurate, I just need something to tell me "it's good/it's bad". Yesterday I was testing "in circuit" and I have to say I got some useful data there too. So that works for me. Of course if you want a proper, true, accurate LCR meter, then you buy something else :)
@walter76713 ай бұрын
I have a homemade one, I made it in the late 80s. It uses the Intersil ICL7107 and is very accurate, the only problem it has is the size and that it doesn't measure capacitors larger than 999uF. To measure them I put them in series, it doesn't measure ESR either but I'm still happy with it. Of course, if I feel like doing something else I might buy that one, mostly for the ESR and other functions, especially inductances. The last thing I made was an HF RF generator, absolutely all shielded, due to a mistake of mine it was missing about 20 additional db in the attenuators. My capacitance meter can hold inside about 30 or more of those haha
@NarutoHpkague2 ай бұрын
Este aparelho não mostra o vloss do capacitor?
@Tony359_22 ай бұрын
No but it does show D - I’m unclear on what the difference is but I understand VLoss might be misleading.
@NarutoHpkague2 ай бұрын
@@Tony359_2 thanks for informations and the good video.
@jdmjesus61033 ай бұрын
Usb rechargeable too? Sold.
@waynegram89073 ай бұрын
It can't measure capacitors at 60hz? I want to measure the ESR at 60hz for filter capacitors in power supplies
@Tony359_23 ай бұрын
I’m not aware of an LCR meter which does 60hz to be honest
@WJV92 ай бұрын
100 Hz is close enough, the tolerance variation from one cap to the next would be more than the small frequency difference. The main thing is to use pure sine wave rather that a square or triangle waveform since the non-sine waves will contain higher frequency harmonics which would distort the ESR readings. For most apps 100 Hz and 10 kHz and 100 kHz would be ideal for most designs.
@RommudohDev3 ай бұрын
That double-beep at the beginning made me jump up and search where it came from...
@railgap2 ай бұрын
Well if it doesn't go from 1F down to 1 attofarad with .000000000000001% precision, I'm just not interested. ;) Well maybe a little interested. I really could wish for a higher capacitance range, even tho the L upper limit is surprising.
@Tony359_22 ай бұрын
Of course this won't compare with a Fluke. But it's priced accordingly :)
@CraftyZA3 ай бұрын
Nice review, but for just a bit more money, you can get a fnirsi lcr meter. Granted, if it was free i will take it. If the target device is entry level, then I would rather spend the extra $5 or $7 and get fnirsi.
@Tony359_23 ай бұрын
which one is it because the FNIRSI component tester I got was junk :)
@CraftyZA3 ай бұрын
@@Tony359_2 Sorry, that was Ali search that messed up. I know they have the TC1 that is crap. It showed another meter which looked much better, but that was in fact not an LCR.
@CraftyZA3 ай бұрын
You can look at FNIRSI LCR-ST1. Might be a better build quality than the zoyi, but most likely the same in measurement
@Tony359_23 ай бұрын
What do you see better in the FNIRSI? I am honestly asking. It's using the same three frequencies, it comes with different tips but everything else seems similar?
@CraftyZA3 ай бұрын
@@Tony359_2 The tweezer bit looks higher quality. Hence I said it just improves on build. Inside it may be exactly the same thing.
@jedi-mic3 ай бұрын
How much is it?
@johnanthonycolley3803Ай бұрын
What actually is " rs " displaying 🤔 Because if it's displaying reactance, then your test capacitors are seriously broken ( ignoring inductive reactance a 1uf capacitor measured at a frequency of; 100hz has an impedance of 1500 ohms And at 100khz would be 1.5 ohms ) 🤔 Interesting video ( love the product) 😊
@Tony359_2Ай бұрын
I do not know to be honest! :)
@MikeGervasi2 ай бұрын
I've been using a "Peak" meter for years.
@Tony359_22 ай бұрын
They are excellent indeed - this is a cheaper option for those who do not have the Peak budget.
@Sir-Dexter2 ай бұрын
nice
@albyboy42783 ай бұрын
Please buy the TC1 instead of that 9V battery one.. TC1 use 100khz tone.
@Tony359_23 ай бұрын
The TC1 I saw online seems to be based on the Atmel design, that is not using a waveform for measurement - see my previous video!
@albyboy42783 ай бұрын
@@Tony359_2 put it on oscilloscope and you will see
@albyboy42783 ай бұрын
@@Tony359_2 Put it on oscilloscope and you will see it do have the tone.. I don't know what they used to generate it but the tone is present on measurements.
@Tony359_23 ай бұрын
I don't have it so I trust you. But then there might be various revisions - or copycats. The Atmel shouldn't be able to do that.
@albyboy42783 ай бұрын
@@Tony359_2 that's true.. finding the good one is hard. The finirsi one is ok at this point, 30€ is a good price.
@Yoyo-me3 ай бұрын
🤔 Mine is NEWCASON XC6013L Was about 30 Euros and is really good. I have also capacity testing on my multimeter buut that is... trash So not an arm and leg ( not or ) were the costs 😅 Cheers
@Tony359_23 ай бұрын
I'd be curious to know what measurement method yours is using! :) Yes, even my Fluke capacitor measurement is not great...
@paulcohen15553 ай бұрын
I have a 6013 type capacitance meter tens of years old. It measures only capacitance, nor ESR. I believe it's based on a R/C timing circuit.
@ericevans40403 ай бұрын
You sold me, 1 in my basket.
@Tony359_23 ай бұрын
I should have asked a commission! :)
@radiotec763 ай бұрын
Here’s an LCR meter that’s accurate and affordable. Thanks!
@Tony359_23 ай бұрын
You're welcome!
@charlesmiller81073 ай бұрын
Miniware has a much better LCR meter. I got the DT71 on Amazon for around $60.00.
@Tony359_23 ай бұрын
For sure, then for £90 you get the Peak Atlas. But for £19 this is not bad :) It depends on budget as usual!
@Roobotics3 ай бұрын
But that's subjective, what makes it 'better' ? Reviews for DT71 are dunking on it for being a toy with terrible accuracy issues, sometimes as bad as 50% on a 100uF and apparently weird cal procedures that might not fix it.
@Tony359_23 ай бұрын
50% is not cool...
@Roobotics3 ай бұрын
@@Tony359_2 I'd never take lone reviews as gospel, but the fact that a few users seem to have general accuracy issues, and that a cal procedure might be needed as soon as you open it, aren't the best indicators.
@Tony359_23 ай бұрын
Sometimes the ‘lone review’ is all you need to discover something. I tend to focus more on those lonely reviews than anything. On Amazon I always sort out the feedback by the worst ones. If I see a trend, chances are it’s true despite how many good feedback the item has.
@FelinoAnticomunista3 ай бұрын
No 100kHz ???
@Tony359_23 ай бұрын
No! Remember it’s a £19 tool!
@FelinoAnticomunista3 ай бұрын
In the "Nuova Elettronica" magazine issue 212, page 104 there is an ESR meter @100Khz. It's simple and it works nice
@Tony359_23 ай бұрын
Ce ne sono tanti disponibili compreso quello di Pier Aisa e MVVBlog 🙂
@Martock10173 ай бұрын
The cheap LC100 LCR meters have a variable but not adjustable testing frequency. It can be as high as 600kHz as I noticed its signal appearing on MW on my SDR dongle. The higher frequencies appear to be used when measuring low-value inductors.
@ashercohen47392 ай бұрын
👍
@chazM61163 ай бұрын
WHY do you have to hold it like you show? I'm also disappointed that you didn't show it working in AUTO mode just because you don't like it, do you not make the video for your viewer's?
@Tony359_23 ай бұрын
If you hold it the other way round your hand will cover the display! :) Sorry to hear you would have loved to see the AUTO function! There are many reviews online, I'm sure one of them will also show the auto feature working!
@chazM61163 ай бұрын
@@Tony359_2 so it's not a requirement to hold horizontal as implied mm that makes sense but not clear in your own words in the video
@MirlitronOne3 ай бұрын
The fact that it says 4.7 millihenrys rather than microhenrys would annoy me.
@Tony359_23 ай бұрын
ahah I always mix that up :)
@mr1enrollmentКүн бұрын
I bought one. Sent it back in hours. Inaccurate. Terrible contacts. Typical.
@Tony359_2Күн бұрын
interesting - the contacts are not superb, but they work here when the component is clean. I am surprised by the inaccuracy though - how did you find that?