Mr Tam is spot on differentiating the probable effect of income gap and wealth gap on the stability of society. However, could that research be distorted by the helicopter money? 至於所謂東升西降,泛指大經濟周期,應指數十年甚至百年的,當然不是絕對直線關係。正如每年天氣和整體氣候變化的分別。Thanks Eddie for bringing a reality check to the discussion, and uplifting the overall quality. Our audience / people need candid intellectual discussions and sharing.
@redcapitalist9 ай бұрын
spot on my a$$. eddie tam is delusional. income inequality is the highest it's ever been in the US. on top of that, don't you know the biden administration is changing definitions left and right to manipulate the economic indicators? lmao
@kyshum9 ай бұрын
到位!
@liulaolao72699 ай бұрын
'stability of society'? Is America better off today? Listen to what trump has to say: 'make America great AGAIN.'
@kyshum9 ай бұрын
@@liulaolao7269 A great thief always!Exploiting world resources from other countries! 美人均炭排放冠全球,”平均“養一個美國人嘅資源可活十個亞洲人
@gabrielleliang15159 ай бұрын
Trump is corrupt, divisive, untrue and upsetting normal governance ! He has been a huge liar, every day, at court , in the White House and on businesses ! He is sued by States and Federal courts for 91 indictments ! He asks the Supreme Court to give him absolute immunity for overturning the results of Presidential Elections and for inciting insurrection to The Capitol on 1/6/2021 ! He is the leader of a cult hijacked the Republican Party! He cares only for himself and his family, 😢not for the country!
@nickpoon6829 ай бұрын
更正確都好, 溝通最重係尊重對方講野時間... 否則就變左有數據嘅潑婦罵街 施生有風度
@kevinyu2389 ай бұрын
譚生有啲似潑婦
@snooker97739 ай бұрын
@@kevinyu238他永遠以為自己才是真理。
@shirleylo3475Ай бұрын
這種 their discussion gives us a chance to understand the economy of USA.and China more. and what American think.and.do......etc
I think Mr. Tam has come to the conclusion too soon concerning the MIT report. However, it is worth studying and analysing the reason and outcome over the medium and long term.
When top 10% Americans owns 70% of all wealth, and bottom 50% owns less than 3%, an 8% income rise among the bottom 10% is practically meaningless, especially in the context of hyperinflation. Mr. Tam’s view of US debt is also delusional; the interest payment to service its 33 trillion (and counting at a rate of one trillion per year) debt will eventually eat into the government budget, with services for the poorest likely suffering the most. Finally, comparing the wealth gap between China’s top and bottom 20% is irrelevant, since rural income per capita has an extreme low base to begin with.
@kmlum10579 ай бұрын
同意你
@stevielee17429 ай бұрын
well said ,sir .i believe he tried confuse people ,and promoted US
@@hongkongner2026 Exactly, 所以如果Income gap 收窄,咁中下階層d 人點累積財富,點可以縮窄貧富懸殊?
@dereklo6209 ай бұрын
@@hongkongner2026 所以我意思係,income gap 收窄係無助改善貧富懸殊,甚至會加劇貧富懸殊。要改善貧富懸殊,一定要由點收窄wealth gap 做起,唔係好似條友講 income gap 收窄左就係美式共富。
@bh-7779 ай бұрын
Point well made
@davidlai3999 ай бұрын
Hyperinflation affects the poor more than the rich. Income rise for the poorest would merely offset the rising cost of living rather than generating any wealth accumulation for the future.
i think even a wide wealth/ income gap is not a problem at all. all efforts should be focused on solving the problem that the poor cannot afford to have acceptable standard of living. i don"t care how wide the wealth gap is, as long as everyone has food and a place to live.
Sze is a real estate agent living on commission. He has no acadamic qualification to have say on economic and finance. Conduct a background check on his education.
@peggychu23659 ай бұрын
Mr. Sze read a lot. He is down to earth, not bound by theories like academics.
@davidlai3999 ай бұрын
Practically all of the wealthiest people in HK have no academic qualifications but yet they know how to make money
The fact he said AI will help production level of blue collars instead of replacing them makes me wanna laugh. That professor is probably under Microsoft’s payroll.
@bh-7779 ай бұрын
I was to make the location xact same point. AI does not improve the productivity of the labour, it replaces them so companies can deliver more for less. This Mr Tam is loud but he doesn't seem to understand mainland China and their decision making rationale very well.
@kyshum9 ай бұрын
Not a professor!He thinks he knows AI?Absolute Idiot!He's thinking outside the box~ Pandora's box ~ADI😈
@jamescheng42999 ай бұрын
Both panelists are economically savvy and knowledgeable; each has raised valid economic points vis-à-vis our contemporary superpowers. Nevertheless, Tam is a little too fervent to show off his financial expertness to end up defeating somehow his own purpose.
@kgb20cmable9 ай бұрын
資產波幅大啫 股市升到咁 貪富又大返😊
@chrisfung17229 ай бұрын
Wealth gap widened while income gap narrowed? Should wealth usually be income generating?