My, Chińczycy, kochamy pokój, ale musimy zadbać o to, aby Stany Zjednoczone także pokochały pokój.❤
@tomhaui376717 күн бұрын
😂😂
@fredbecker60716 күн бұрын
And, you have great sense of humor
@jameschoice398316 күн бұрын
@@fredbecker607 No, he is just fact based and seriously correct. USAIPAC are undisputable the major warmongers within the last 8 decades. By far. Mostly unprovoced, illegal and criminal. Europe has to pay a very high price for US/ UK/ Israel criminal actions withim the last three decades. Name Refugee-crisis, Islamism, Terrorism. Thx, Uncle Sam, Thx Bibi & Co!
@阿污卵15 күн бұрын
😂😂😂
@Nahjitwhat14 күн бұрын
US is superior to Chyna. Russia is also superior to Chyna
@northyork625317 күн бұрын
This drone is actually two SAR radars on high sky. With multiple wz9 work together, it can scan very big areas and AI can process the collected data and tell the target.
@andrewli979318 күн бұрын
In the Dark Forest, you can only survive when you are stronger!
@zfwang689017 күн бұрын
and hide
@GgfgHhk17 күн бұрын
Only the Jewish consortium lives in the dark forest, while the Chinese live under the sun
@kingwing320316 күн бұрын
@@zfwang6890 所有国家都已经暴露,无处藏身
@mcguerd817 күн бұрын
Cheap, safe, creative. Probably will be even more improved with so many top notch engineers graduating every year from their state universities with no tuition fees.
@LuZhao-z4q12 күн бұрын
Chinese universities do charge tuitions, although not high.
@kongrong31118 күн бұрын
简单点说就是在天上架起雷达阵列,就像当初把高超音速导弹搬到驱逐舰上一样
@kesai11912 күн бұрын
你说的也太简单了,道理是这么个道理,但是要把道理变成现实,显然没那么简单。
@bf79917 күн бұрын
Maybe the Chinese are the best students of aliens. . . .
@leoxing769710 күн бұрын
No aliens just human intelligence and determination.
@neo_smith16 күн бұрын
You can imagine how depressed the US military was when all the US stealth aircraft could not be stealthy. They won't be able to drop bombs on people's heads.😂
@fredbecker60716 күн бұрын
Keep believing that
@Nahjitwhat14 күн бұрын
🤡🤡🤡Israel just penetrated Russian radars in Iran. Just watch what happens when US Japan or South Korea penetrates Chinese temu copies of Russian radars
@danishh845414 күн бұрын
Better than us propaganda@@fredbecker607
@patrickkoh105613 күн бұрын
@@fredbecker607actually he's probably right. China has the brains to be ahead. Their IQ is higher than the US
@Naylamp2118 күн бұрын
I understand. China would build hundreds of these cheap drones. They would fly ahead of the Chinese AWACS. Nothing would escape their sight... That's scary!!
@ozsharpener17 күн бұрын
It's definitely not of low cost as it has a 40 meter wing span, equipped with AESA radars with pretty large aperture.
@davidz785817 күн бұрын
Keep crying that makes me happy 😅😅😅
@smashsmash586617 күн бұрын
50 million each is cheap to you?????
@liu3gz17 күн бұрын
50 million is much cheaper than an AWACS with a bunch of human on board. Those human are very well trained and can not be easily replaced.
@cheungchingtong17 күн бұрын
How do you know it is cheap? It is not a small aircraft at all, with loads of electronics and radars in it.
@ozsharpener17 күн бұрын
TBH this drone came up in 2015 and is now 10 years old!
@佯谬17 күн бұрын
只是一台会飞的雷达,它拥有上帝视角凝视任何飞行器。
@Erain655617 күн бұрын
gazing from above far beyond the altitude where even air-to-air missiles can not touch
China also has submarine detection, tracking and neutralization technology.
@philoso37717 күн бұрын
The RCS characteristics of F-22,35 are superior is only optimized (minimized) for approaching angles. That made it very difficult to detect by enemy fighter planes in a head on path. That is how we can claim F22,35 a first strike success capability against enemy fighter planes. Is however vulnerable to enemy radars detection from all sides. That opens an opportunity for WZ-9 commissioned as distributed air borne radar system for early warning and enemy plane locations.
Concentrate on garlic; the threat of garlic is imminent.
@PutraMing18 күн бұрын
😱😱😱😂😂😂❤❤❤WOW GOD BLESS CHINA
@jameschoice398317 күн бұрын
Why should "God" (non existent, but...well) bless China? Because of their system of total control of its people? Because they don´t care about what the people want (See Taiwan- they do not want to be part of China) Because of their cultural genocide of the Uigurs? Let us know...
@samhy18 күн бұрын
China WZ-9 devine eagle bigger than with longer indurance the than US RQ-4 global hawk with far more advance of radar technology with communication technonoly the than the US RQ-4 global hawk technology. 👍👍👍👏👏👏
@jameschoice398317 күн бұрын
So you want to tell us, that China finally is ready to commit the same large scale imperialist wars/ crimes as the US? Beginning with Taiwan, whose people (!) DO NOT WANT to be part of China? And I thought, it is called the "Peoples (!) Republic of China"? Well then: Happy New Year...
@nathanryweck313717 күн бұрын
How do you know that exactly?
@ChefjeffreyB16 күн бұрын
Sure it does, and expect it to survive during a shooting war. Chinese can barely build an engine for its jets, copies technologies from others, can't seem to train pilots, but somehow things its more advanced. Name me one thing created by the Chinese in modern times.
@huachen383615 күн бұрын
@@ChefjeffreyB U
@remix-yy1hs15 күн бұрын
@@ChefjeffreyBi hooe ypu became the president of the united state. We need more people like. Hurra
@zenmaizamurai534317 күн бұрын
Now we need an anti stealth drone detecting aircraft detecting drone
@thomasdelbert17 күн бұрын
Any modern warplane could detect those. Their only advantage is being cheap and numerous.
@Whitfield36916 күн бұрын
@@thomasdelbertand able to detect stealthy aircraft’s.
@spikermike284317 күн бұрын
Basically a look-down active array radar from 50k feet and above that scans huge chuck of sky for 48 hours per sortie, rendering all current stealth effort useless as the entire top side of the fuselage and wings are exposed.
@shumingtan688518 күн бұрын
with time, i think the satellites will be equipped capacity to monitor a much larger sky from the top to detect stealthy aircrafts.
@Erain655617 күн бұрын
Chinese scholars have just published a few papers on this (actually using Musk's satellite signals 😂) to detect stealth fighters
There is no difficulty in detecting stealth fighters. The issue is to target them. S-400 SAM battery targetable distance for the F-35 is about 21 miles. And GL in even detecting a B-2 or B-21. Those platforms are designed to gobble up every photon from the X band down to the L band.
@gofy999016 күн бұрын
"There is no difficulty in detecting stealth fighters", THANK AGIAN WHAT IS STEALTH
@johnroberts992216 күн бұрын
@@gofy9990 You don't understand the difference between detecting and targeting a stealth fighter.
@hharry531517 күн бұрын
Why did the door frame of my house fly up into the sky?
@fengying-haoyunllianlian17 күн бұрын
That's because you're not tethered.
@don13714 күн бұрын
Sure it can.
@bigearl386717 күн бұрын
I love those vertical stabilizers and that big ol engine stuck on the back between the two giant tail fins. Nice detectable target.
@Capt.S8916 күн бұрын
it detects from a far.
@Whitfield36916 күн бұрын
Maybe you don’t get it. This is not meant to be a stealth plane. It detects stealth planes so other planes can shot them down. Even if it is shot down trading a stealthy fighter jet is very good trade.
@briandavis84917 күн бұрын
so new first target. cool design though
@JosephHolness-u2m16 күн бұрын
The Flying Tabogen
@robertluiswilliams718917 күн бұрын
Heat differential As. A. Wave. Pattern recognition 😊
@張子房-n1c17 күн бұрын
Protoss Observer🤔
@jonasfernandes414412 күн бұрын
Mericas domination is ending
@jimmychin966617 күн бұрын
They stole that technology from the Philippines.
@Erain655617 күн бұрын
Philippines? are you serious, can they do basic math?
@jimmychin966617 күн бұрын
@Erain6556 that's why the Americans are there,so that they can learn from them....everybody knows this.
@happymelon712916 күн бұрын
@@Erain6556 🤣U didn't get the joke
@张伟-d9v16 күн бұрын
小心哦
@gogorunalways16 күн бұрын
a door fly in the sky?
@David-u6z6w17 күн бұрын
Would these drones be shot down first when war break out ?
@johnroberts992217 күн бұрын
Why bother? They make no difference on the battlefield.
@wision88817 күн бұрын
it's too high
@JohnJones-k9d16 күн бұрын
@@johnroberts9922your talk8ng about the us military. Ch8nese beat you twice. Korea they beat you because you yanks ran and we Brits had to keep holding the l8ne whilst the us army kept running away. Then they beat you in Vietnam.
@johnroberts992216 күн бұрын
@@JohnJones-k9d In case you had not heard the entire Western world depends on the US military. Why don't you Brits take your Navy and police the shipping around the world? Oh wait, a single one of the 11 US Navy's carrier strike groups has more firepower that the entire British navy.
@Whitfield36916 күн бұрын
How? You think they just send the drones alone to be shot down? You don’t thinking their stealth jets are with them so the enemy stealth jets can be detected first? Whoever shoots at these drones will be sitting ducks for their stealth jets.
@SkyB777817 күн бұрын
Pakistan should have some of them
@goteborger17 күн бұрын
I can see u~~~
@michaelr485813 күн бұрын
18,000 meters is not very high. I’m pretty sure a B2/21 can fly higher. Can it detect something flying even higher or just the same or lower?
@nickloong18 күн бұрын
Stealth vs Stealth 😂😂😂
@jameswalker789915 күн бұрын
Disappointingly vague. Is the WZ-9 capable of detecting stealth a/c w/precision, sufficient for air defense to acquire a "lock" on the stealthy a/c? If the answer is no, then the WZ-9 adds little to existing capabilities. If the answer is yes, then of course that's entirely different.
@GK34-we2bu17 күн бұрын
Paper dragon.
@JWscandi14 күн бұрын
the US called China is the ONLY civilisation that can threaten the US in every field....and u call China "paper dragon"...u must be sick!
@sunnykfc17 күн бұрын
It's time for America to pay-back.😅
@jeffreyzhang-p8q16 күн бұрын
The United States is China's defeated foe. Haha.
@barrykennedy994717 күн бұрын
Do you really think they are showing their hands by showing us able functional military aircraft? And I don't mean just able to fly.
@朝辉-w6g16 күн бұрын
听说这玩意隐身😂
@tonydibartolo798518 күн бұрын
I don't understand this, why can't this be taken out with a HARM anti-radiation missile? have an F-35 or a F-22 or as a matter of fact any aircraft that can carry the HARM just shoot it down?
@camp00218 күн бұрын
It could be taken out by one but there would be a bunch of them so they would have use a lot of them to do it which makes it more difficult to do
@tonydibartolo798518 күн бұрын
@@camp002 yes but even if there are many of them, we also have a lot of fighter jets that can carry the HARM missile.
@camp00218 күн бұрын
@@tonydibartolo7985 yeah but this will make any strike more difficult and expensive
@johnsilver933818 күн бұрын
@@camp002 HARM is even cheaper than AMRAAM. So its definitely more cost effective.
@yangwang803018 күн бұрын
AWACs are always outside the strike range of any air to air missiles. Eyes see farther than guns can reach.
Another propaganda . The video shows nothing about the detention . If it's real why didn't you show at least part of it if not the whole video?
@yzyz777917 күн бұрын
Dia maping ruang udara dengan i❤nfra red scanning? different between conventional radar, ray wave no turning back but super sensitive,when touching any object on the direction,like stealth coating on aircraft ,they use drones,fucking genius
@Slamminmor17 күн бұрын
So they can detect stealth but can't build stealth on their own 😂😂😂😂. How do you even know stealth when you don't know what stealth is 😂😂. Make it make sense
@Kevin-kd6hf17 күн бұрын
???were you born and live under a rock??
@FernandoMoreiraR17 күн бұрын
they already know how to build Stealth, crappy stealth maybe, but stealth nevertheless
@goldriverbank664716 күн бұрын
Ignorance is good for you 😂
@Blanzalot17 күн бұрын
this channel is lolz
@GK34-we2bu17 күн бұрын
This is good propaganda though.
@kamsunleong664817 күн бұрын
That's for them to know and for you to find out.
@amanwitheyes18 күн бұрын
But how does it exactly detect highly stealthy aircraft? This video doesn’t cover that at all. Whilst it’s an interesting report, it simply doesn’t answer that question. To my knowledge, there’s no known radar system or otherwise to detect any of the US stealth aircraft.
@camp00218 күн бұрын
Stealth doesn't make it invisible just harder to detect and it is greatly affected by the angle of the observer, this would work with multiple craft and they would combine the data together to find it
@johnsilver933818 күн бұрын
Only an AWACS would be able to see 5th gen stealth at medium to long range as they carry large powerful radar arrays atop them. More likely this uses infrared IR sensors to detect stealth similar to Global Hawk.
@Mentaculus4218 күн бұрын
During Dessert Storm the F-117 was tracked by low frequency radar. Also with a ceiling of nearly 60,000 feet it can look down at the stealth aircraft and see the least stealth surfaces (engine inlets & control surfaces). So with the built in antennas at more advantageous frequencies (lower) and other drones off at angles searching for reflections of this signal, maybe this has a chance. Remember, the stealth aircraft have a shape to not reflect the radar directly back to the transmitter. The look down aspect is particularly important.
@tonypeng181518 күн бұрын
Long wave length can detect stealthy aircraft but can't lock on as fire control. That's why WZ-9 is so big. It will act as early warning system.
@Mentaculus4218 күн бұрын
@@tonypeng1815 First you have to detect and determine the area where the stealth aircraft is then you can start the vectoring process and play with different frequencies. Once an attack asset is vectored in close enough, then the game changes. The process goes through phases, detection, refining location, closing in with attack assets (missiles) that get close enough and fast enough to not get shot down. The Chinese are not stupid, they understand these issues. This drone is part of an integrated system. Will it be good enough?
@IssacBerry-nd8pt16 күн бұрын
i am CHINESE, pls ask PLA to make solar power version or balloon version! I dont have money to send that drone 24x7x365! pls, i got no money, no food!
@cylentone17 күн бұрын
A 35 meter wingspan slow flying sitting duck for BVR weapons that can only detect the vicinity of stealth aircraft in low frequencies but not provide high frequency target data. Yay.
@oot00717 күн бұрын
It took your mighty f22 two missiles to shootdown a balloon within visual distance. How many missiles to shoot this BVR? 🤣
@cylentone17 күн бұрын
@ One. Now think about why it took 2 for the balloon. 🙄 You guys literally have no idea about aircraft or weapons tech. What are you doing here?
@oot00717 күн бұрын
@cylentone Did you know that the f22 was planned to be retired by 2030 and replaced by NGAD? It does not have 360 degree sensors and no HMD. After spending countless $$ they still could not fit the HMD under the canopy. Have you compared the f22 to the 5th gen j20? Which of those two planes has a HMD and 360 degree sensors and 20% higher service ceiling (60000 vs 50000) , 83% greater range (5500km vs 3000), 88% greater missile range (300km vs 160), more advanced radar and avionics, 17% greater engine thrust (182 kN vs 156) and 31% greater engine thrust to weight ratio (11.6 vs 8.8) compared to the other? It is the same plane from the country that produces more of the worlds gallium (99%), germanium (59%) and antimony than any other country and exports them to the yooessay.
@oot00717 күн бұрын
@cylentone It took 2 for the balloon cause the f22 is an awesome plane with an awesome pilot. The scary slow moving balloon was too difficult for your f15 and f16 so they sent your f22 instead.
@cylentone17 күн бұрын
@ Everybody knows the NGAD will replace the F-22 for cost reasons. It's cheaper to build the NGAD than restart F-22 production and upgrade it. Did you know the USA is developing a 2nd 6th gen fighter for the Navy = FA/XX? Did you know you are comparing the J-20 to a 27 year old aircraft? Or that Su Bin, a Chinese national, stole the design documents of both the F-22 and F-35 and provided them to China, otherwise China would be nowhere in stealth? Or that even the F-16 is getting HUD helmets now, while they're being tested in F-22s? Or that the F-35 is already by far the most technologically advanced fighter in every respect but getting upgraded to Block 4 now? That's probably why you chose to compare to the F-22. 😏 Cope harder little Jin Bot.