Great to see you back (to microecology) ;-) and excited to follow this project. I kind of like the combination of your top 2 ideas - phylotypR.
@NATS75995 ай бұрын
I care! Love the series idea...so happy you are back! Appreciate all the time that it takes to build the content!
@Riffomonas5 ай бұрын
Thanks! 🤓
@drjzee5 ай бұрын
this is an excellent meditation on package naming, which is very hard to do yet important to get right, when one thinks of many commonly used bioinformatics packages they often have meaningful and catchy names...but this is challenging. quite like phylotype, only additional thought might be phylotype_r , which would be a nod to both R and to tidyverse, which presumably will be used extensively
@Riffomonas5 ай бұрын
Thanks! One catch that I may have forgotten to mention is that we can't use punctuation in package names. So unfortunately we can't use the underscore :(
@anupmandal99025 ай бұрын
Great
@stes54295 ай бұрын
That's a terrific project! Thanks!
@Riffomonas5 ай бұрын
Thanks! I’m petrified everyone will be too bored with the question 🤣
@ngn25 ай бұрын
What about "phyloprofiler"? 🤔 Thanks for sharing the journey with us!
@Riffomonas5 ай бұрын
Thanks! That’s a bit of a tongue twister 🤣
@ngn25 ай бұрын
@@Riffomonas Another idea, "classiphyler" 😁
@man_shooo5 ай бұрын
How about classiphy or classiphyR or something like that
@Riffomonas5 ай бұрын
Hmmm. Interesting idea. Y’all are coming up with some good options
@jlntp16425 ай бұрын
dadR 😉
@Riffomonas5 ай бұрын
fathuR 🤣
@jlntp16425 ай бұрын
@@Riffomonas I was thinking kindly trolling dada2 at the same time 😀 I can't wait to follow your videos series.
@Riffomonas5 ай бұрын
@@jlntp1642 Geewhiz, that's how out of it I am these days - didn't even think of that!
@sven9r5 ай бұрын
there is only one rule in naming an R package... it must contain a capital R :D