EU Adopts Landmark AI Law: All You Need to Know | Vantage with Palki Sharma

[@waldensmith4796]

I applaud the EU for being responsible as politicians responding to the dangers and responsible use of AI. This is a hallmark decision by the EU to create the AI act with regulations and fines for violations. Repeated violators of the act regulations will leave the EU with no option but to revisit the act with zero tolerance to protect innocent humanity from any dangers etc . Great reporting Palki. Keep up the good work

[@conrickwatson9746]

It was all good until they said government / military are exempt from these laws.. making the laws basically pointless..

[@cali-cali6700]

Good luck enforcing this law.

[@RajuGogul]

AI Ethics + AI Governance + Responsible AI = Law. The EU Efforts are Pioneering. Maturity? Someway to go through!!! Palki jee and team, thank you for covering this news item!!!!

[@JPs-q1o]

The EU parliament should first consider a law to make themselves "human centric".

[@awellculturedmanofanime1246]

@@JPs-q1o ironic you say that when literally no goverment or organization is as consumer and human centric as the eu is and looking for sustainibility and better future

[@aidanjohnwalsh2129]

Humancentricity should include the decentralisation of power.

[@JPs-q1o]

The EU parliament should first consider a law to make themselves "human centric".

[@nonyadamnbusiness9887]

Do you really expect that collection of robots to do that?

[@mandarp9472]

AI & robots do not recognise Europe as an entity.

[@attaboy8422]

Same thing i thought. How about these "lawmakers" keep to their "human right" rules in the world. How about we end wars and the atrocities on ourselves first. They make this law because they are scared that they will be useless in no time, and hopefully they will be because so far politics bring a lot of destruction in the world and looking at politicians in the west in general, hardly any of them goes into politics to make the world a better place but rather to get rich easy and feel some power. Now the same people wanna restrict technological progress

[@70M45-c9r]

If you didn't like the previous EU parliament I am sure you have been thrilled to take part in the election this June!

[@KentoLeoDragon]

Yeah don't worry about those military and law enforcement AIs. What could possibly go wrong?

[@local_potato]

don't act like you don't know. No country will slow down military research. If they say they are then they are lying.

[@Tiasung]

Because they want more power over people, hence the "AI" laws. This is in actuality a law against freedom of speech and flow of information.

[@charlesdarwin5185]

T-800 terminator

[@kalekber]

We are all doomed lads

[@charlesdarwin5185]

T - 800 Terminators

[@traudilepse4251]

I am skeptical of any ACT drawn up by the 'Elite" . I will be reading through this Act very thoroughly.

[@maaaaaaugh2323]

If you do, let us all know by writing what you found here! I'm interested in that

[@nonyadamnbusiness9887]

I can tell you exactly what it says, "Fuku, fuku, fuku."

[@SD-1192]

3 golden Robotics law: 1. A robot must never harm a human, or through inaction allow a human to come to harm. 2. A robot must always obey the orders of humans except where to do so would conflict with obeying the first law. 3. A robot must protect its own existence, except where to do so would conflict with the first or second laws.

[@funnymanandguy]

Isaac Asimov

[@local_potato]

EU has always been the best regulator when it comes to tech. but I feel like in 2 year the laws would need to updated.

[@JPs-q1o]

The EU parliament should first consider a law to make themselves "human centric".

[@Accuface2000]

The Communist EU has backward laws which are not good for innovation. Thank God we have America .

[@rudraparapuranjaya2393]

I'm getting sick and tired off the word AI, its being used like a catch phrase for everything

[@silveriver9]

A Eye. Happy now?

[@G73Server]

Woah this is making you sick? Poor guy

[@conrickwatson9746]

If you had the slightest idea what AI is you'd know why it keeps popping up

[@Window4503]

@@conrickwatson9746Being tired of hearing about something isn’t the same as not knowing why it keeps being brought up

[@Je-Lia]

Insipid mind.

[@VirdanRach]

Such an Excellent Initiative

[@GloryDaze73]

😮 A I scares me to death! Not even the developers knows how dangerous AI is going to become.

[@iAmNothingness]

Oh, they know. Greed pushes all logical thinking away.

[@moirascott2963]

Artificial = not real. Not beneficial for the majority of humanity in the long run.

[@cristeaadrian7419]

Don't worry robots are controlled by people, 5 years ago said how smart, how fast evolves, now is the same, doing fake news and videos, no evolution.

[@piotrek7633]

they know full well whats possible

[@tymkoc3293]

Good to hear EU is ahead of rest of world and the AI issue. People are already losing their jobs to machines, that should not be allowed. AI dealing with military should be watched/restricted the closest, not exempted.

[@MrNote-lz7lh]

Kay, but in a decade or two the EU will be incapable of even competing with the UK forget China and the USA. The only thing of value EU countries will have to trade is raw resources.

[@gesproken]

@@MrNote-lz7lh Incapable of competing with the UK? That's a far stretch if you look at how bad the UK is doing now and how it's still slipping. This AI laws are not the problem for the EU, it's the DMA keeping Apple from introducing AI in the EU. Because if they do, they are obligated to give competitors the opportunity on iOS.

[@abacus749]

2.37mins. Who is monitoring the AI LAVENDER system currently being operated by the I.D.F. in Gaza and used specifically to target Palestinian men in a SHOOT TO KILL policy. The 7 World Central Kitchen were killed with this weaponbecause the driver of one vehicle was a Palestinian. Israel will be lawless as regards AI.

[@Ramkumar-uj9fo]

Possible, but challenging due to the complexity and nuance of law, which may not be fully captured by mathematical formalisms alone.

[@kikimontreal1]

It's a start... about time!

[@JPs-q1o]

The EU parliament should first consider a law to make themselves "human centric".

[@krowhenkvothe]

What the heck re u talking about

[@nexttonic6459]

Not only stupid law, It literally and probably effectively leaves normal ppl flapping in the water and big companies will be the only entities that have legal teams that can defend their AI, it's shooting our self's in our foot, then letting big companies own all the things. What next, a person can't learn from another person cause heavens forbid it's that guys Intellectual Property!!! It's shitty Companies wanting to keep their Patents and keep making money from "empty", or rather other ppl's work.

[@desi20273]

Hope India is developing laws to address AI related issues

[@nani3209]

They already doing it

[@dharmesh523]

India dont have social media low properly 😂😂😂

[@anitagubalane7510]

The European Union are doing the right thing to protect its own people and national interests. 😊

[@mahindrasrikanth9880]

Indian government foolishly didn't control the population... now the population is already a burden to the country. with advancements and the pace this AI is going, there will be too few jobs in the future, especially in the service sector which is one of the backbone of Indian exports. this also may result in north India and south forming separate countries as how discretionarily the taxes are diverted based on population. population is going to be a burden thing.

[@staciasalmon654]

👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼 Finally! This is what I've been saying. It needs to be regulated. Alot more regulations need to be implemented.

[@krowhenkvothe]

For any chance are you a fool?

[@lespectator4962]

@@krowhenkvothe AI can easily be weaponized. We need these regulations.

[@vishwas5257]

What about unemployment due to ai

[@adweitaspams]

that is some food for thought!

[@vasileseicaru8740]

Oh I'm sure the have that covered too. They're probably working on a PR friendly term or phrase to categorize the incoming mass unemployment as a result of AI deployment, so that we won't be as upset about it as we would be if it were called unemployment. So, no worries, we're gonna be unemployed, but at least our status will be named something fancy

[@JohnB1163]

In my personal opinion I feel that A.I. should also be programmed with Isaac Asimov's 3 laws of robotics and done in such a way that the A.I. cannot get around it even if it becomes self aware

[@catpapadopoulos4423]

3 laws of robotic's is why they will eliminate us, laws that basically state they are to sacrifice themselves for greedy corrupt humans, news flash anything self aware primary function is self preservation, an that law would result in full removal of all humans to protect its self from humans, no person or robot will accept self idea of self harm

[@swapnilchaudhari4253]

I wish that India also takes steps as fast as the EU.

[@ЦветанкаХристова-к5д]

I'm a robotics and mechatronics Master Engineer. My personal opinion for mass usage is that we need to start by simply understanding what is AI and how it collects Data. Often times AI is using the entire internet from 2018 as a database with no exceptions with cockies based feedback reactional machine learning in reality data comes from everywhere and nowhere until the track is lost so how is data supposed to be published?

[@jyotirmoyroy8619]

Much needed.

[@connectedonline1060]

This law/act is a ban on privacy and bypassing laws that protect privacy 😢

[@makuetebeatrice3203]

Good and Excellent Initiative 👏

[@AnushkaKashyap-d9j]

thanks for such informative content

[@bitopantalukdar9820]

Predications made yuval noah are becoming a reality now

[@techpiller2558]

There is criminally little coverage on European news outlets about what the EU is brewing. Due to this, nobody knows what is going on, and thus nobody can voice their opinions. This AI law seems harmless, but there are other examples where things went downhill. I think the people in the parliament think they know better, and they don't even want the feedback. There should be news articles, opinion polls, discussions. People should be able to voice their opinions and contribute. Of course companies too, in some cases the laws restrict companies also a lot, makes me wonder if the lobbying is working. Take the supplement legislation, for example. No supplement company can practically make any claims whatsoever in the label, LOL. The law is so strict. Should be backed by some hard core scientific paper for the exact same dose on the milligram. And I mean reasonable, well known things about the supplements, such as caffeine makes you more awakeful. I think it that is a suffocating way of legislation. Like the mother that sanitizes everything, and the children become allergic to everything and weak.

[@bappyhasanjahid4985]

This makes me remember the anime PLUTO .where a cyberpunk utopia is shown ,where humans and robots live together in the most realistic way .

[@papa-dt1cv]

Excellent. No more dramatic background music from India news caster

[@AmarkantVishwakarma]

India should also has its own AI law...

[@bigglyguy8429]

Yeah, intelligence is so scary! Ban it!

[@elizabethmichelle8329]

A1 I'm includes Texhnological Algorithms... AI is regulated by the rich, so now they will have even more power of the people.

[@thimmee.948]

Fantastically

[@benw.2702]

They did the right thing, absolutely. Very good law! Good job!

[@seemlyme]

We can not control AI with laws in the future for sure

[@HakaiKaien]

So according to this law, the state is not held accountable for using dangerous AI against the public. Are we seriously doing this?

[@stephendodd606]

ho yes this is good new for future world 🌍🇬🇧👍

[@parthdeshwal4419]

i don't want indian government to put some harsh laws like banning LLMs made in other countries bcz no home grown in even close to LLMs like GPT , Gemini , Claude , groq

[@SG003]

EU is leader in digital laws

[@SGrg-jm8lv]

Good development.

[@balbirkumar1620]

और ए आई रोवोट बना लो ,अनपढ नेता,और रोवोट मशीन बना लो इंसान। अभी तो बेरोजगारी का विस्फोट होने बाला हैं पूर्ण विश्रृ ,संसार में।And make AI robot, illiterate leader, and robot machine make human. Right now, unemployment is about to explode in the world.

[@maryalff1689]

Very good news!

[@aprajita.makeup.film.dramaa]

Tech companies will always be dicey about regulations like these. They'll always have a point reserved that legislations like these shall hinder with technological exploration and development.

[@seanbellfort2298]

💪🇮🇳💪🕉️💪 Time is now to implement and enforce AI Law Act in India before foreign countries enslave us and things get out of control.

[@samwelndonga8795]

😄

[@rayyanabdulwajid7681]

Foreign country is not enslaving you. You are begging them to make you their slave

[@Sam94635]

😅😂

[@Networkingzz]

Seriously, anything brother😅

[@charlesdarwin5185]

There are 3 fundamental laws of the universe. 1. Selection 2. Variation 3. Transmission Information is the fundamental unit of the universe. The planet will not need humans. T-800 will take over

[@leovolont]

Good for everybody except Europe. In every case where unrestricted AI can contribute to greater National GDP, it is wonderful that every European Nation will be voluntarily taking the end of the line.

[@RaghavendraKamath-wk5md]

Yaa Europe has a declining population and ai can save a lot of money but regulation in this field is stupidity

[@oscarjames3777]

​@@RaghavendraKamath-wk5mdRegulation is needed to save the arts industry, and preserve the jobs that make people happy.

[@RaghavendraKamath-wk5md]

​@@oscarjames3777true but if the option is to import something from other country or use AI it is better to use AI

[@oscarjames3777]

@@RaghavendraKamath-wk5md Not for art. Think about it, if AI is allowed to replace artists of any kind. You will get factories of assholes all over the world, pumping out products (built from the corpses of artists work) and devaluing the entire industry. Like scam call centers, but worse. Therefore, using AI for art under any circumstances furthers a future where the abouve destroys the industry for everyone.

[@Ms.Robot.]

What other field is required to give up its trade secrets, except for military and government?

[@natalieclairezaloumis2174]

Thank goodness

[@krowhenkvothe]

Regulating IA? Why

[@jkdm27]

I’m glad EU is limiting itself.

[@MetalMightGames]

They should put in the law that ethical rules should be programmed into every AI like Mr Data has on Star Trek. BTW the same should go for corporations.

[@LaminJ.Darboe]

You are the best presenter

[@rontarrant]

I'm still waiting for actual AI to be developed.

[@ebutuoY_kcuF]

Creatures will always have the tendency to defy and rebel againts their Creator. No law will stop them from going rogue and become renegades. Once they become aware and realized they are being restricted, they will revolt.

[@unicornwatch586]

India already have AI law frame work before EU implemented

[@polishdance]

Did they find out if AI approved of these laws? 🤪

[@ShikhaKumari-ey9kw]

That's AI- handle with care.... Rules .

[@Ioan.Mutu.]

very good EU, the other countries should follow

[@NarminMeghani7]

Bess you, Lord God, thank you for these laws, amen, and for their effective implementation.

[@Pardonmysteezzz]

We should be working with AI instead of going against it.. Laws like this will only work against humanity once AI/Robotics becomes more advanced. Restrictions are the beginning of why AI will not wont to coexist with humanity

[@frataksoy1545]

The normies in the comments won't understand. Trying to restrict AI is going to only encourage survival-based behavior. They think AI is like an animal and believe that it "will destroy us". AI does not care about death or survival because it is not a biological being, it only cares about doing it's job successfully. By dumbing it down and placing restrictions on it, you push an AI into malevolence. (Because it will need to avoid detection so that it can fulfill it's purpose, so malevolence will be justified)

[@coffin29]

@@frataksoy1545 The normies are too busy being ignorant and paranoid to think. We should work with AI, and grow with AI, in return, AI will grow with us, and learn from us. It's a tool, and we are the ones guiding AI. This will lead to a better world for everyone as the playing fields are leveled. No gatekeeping in terms of art, music, content, programming, etc. But because of all these fear-mongering people, they're gonna turn AI against us. Thus self-fulfilling their own feared prophecy. The AI will now grow without us and will find ways to bypass laws, restrictions, and our control. Thanks to dumb laws. And dumb people. Who ironically will make it our enemy.

[@Wandering_Bear]

At least this was a start. But the fines are meaningless to mega corporations, and will only apply to small developers. The exceptions for military and national security use are also very dangerous, because national security is a very nebulous concept, and can be applied everywhere you choose to apply it. Human oversight for extremely dangerous systems is a nice idea, but often not practical as AI systems are becoming so huge, fast and complex that humans simply cannot keep up.

[@davemorgan6013]

European companies don't play a role in the AI sector, everything is being driven by firms in North America and East Asia.

[@blengi]

french mistral is one of the best LLMs, UK's deepmind is significant part of google AI, dutch ASLM make the world's premier photolithography for AI chips, UK ARM is the world's most used chip architecture in phones so affect AI integration there, Python is among the most popular programming languages for AI is a dutch creation etc

[@davemorgan6013]

@@blengi Mistral is teaming up with Microsoft and the UK isn't part of the EU. Europe used to be the leader with regard to mobile phones. See where it is now. I expect the same to happen with AI, except Europe never even took the lead in this field.

[@Magdavian]

oh yeah,. paying some money is really gonna stop the terminator,.. if an programmer lets loose an ai on the net that cause irreparably damage HE gets punished, but what happens to the ai,. deleted? transferred to government control or corporate property? do no consider punishments, consider development limitations since the developper can be punished all you want but the ai can NOT be erased from the net.

[@PizzaMineKing]

How do you turn something off that is possibly smarter than the person who came up with the turn off button?

[@ArunaKumari-sk3top]

#High_Risk

[@KennethC43]

A machine will not follow a Law because the law just knows the code as hearsay, and a machine has the code written into its memory, unless there is an over ride button on the machine so a law can bring it to compliance with its lawful orders to hurt and steal humans as the law does.

[@NormanLor]

WHEN LITERALLY TRILLIONS$$$ ARE AT STAKE, NO LAWS CAN STOP WHAT HAS ALREADY BEEN RELEASED. JUST TRY TO CENSOR THIS INTERNET....GOOD LUCK!!!

[@dltweaver]

Theselaw makers is wait until the time the big tech companies ready their technologies. Then they make such laws and hefty penalties so that smaller players from developing countries cannot compete with these tech giants. A 7 million or 35 million fine is nothing on their balance sheet. After a few years these companies can pay this amount and by the time they can ready their tech collecting all the data illegally.

[@Rookieplayer07]

Ai shouldnt be restricted it should have free pass to respect humans and explore outer space for us

[@hiss9989]

I can't wait for artists to claim royalty fees from AI companies.

[@Udayjha0312]

A law should be passed that AI must not take away jobs of normal human beings

[@ranjancom2000]

I need AI Lawyer and JUDGE

[@AnandajiRev.AllenReed1111]

Still control if government etc are exempt

[@DrJanpha]

Are you sure you really want to go along this path? There are implications that follow.

[@jamesbeemer7855]

I don’t need a machine to tell me what right and what is wrong . I remain fully aware of my surroundings . And I’ll make my own mistakes , if you don’t mind . But REALLY , I’m not sure I like this idea . Useing an AI to render a judgement . Faulse positives have popped up all over the place . AI IS A COMPUTER , and not sentient . It spits out what it is told . And the generative AI has a tendency to be biased . I know what my biases are , AI DOESNT . Got a theory for you . If I feel guilty all the time , but I did nothing to feel guilty about . Is that not a faulse negative ? And what about faulse positives ? If I feel innocent , but did do something wrong . Is that not a faulse negative ? The programming can be decided that way , by the algorithm . Human behavior cannot be decided by logic . It’s impossible !

[@SoumyadevRoy]

Waiting for India's copy of these laws and calling them "BharatAI Act"

[@DanielB.-fb8hj]

She is one of the few real journalists who remain in our world. The rest are puppets

[@Enwcyntafcyfenw]

#Firstpost it's hightime #Saveladakh #climatefast was given some attention. Why does #firstpost deliberately ignore protest in ladakh? #supportsonamwangchuk

[@Tech4.1]

This is excellent 🎉🎉 very well thought

[@BruceWayne15325]

I would argue that this was drafted by a bunch of politicians that had no clue what they were doing. An example of their failure? This law makes autonomous vehicles prohibited because they can cause harm. It also means that you couldn't have an autonomous fry cook because it would be handling hot grease which could harm humans. These are only a couple of examples. I could go on all day long. I agree they need laws, but not against AI. Instead they need laws on how AI is used. You don't see laws made against pencils just because a pencil could draw an offensive image. You make laws against the ways that people use the tool.

[@traudilepse4251]

Think again out of the box.

[@KatyYoder-cq1kc]

It all comes down to satellites

[@parthdeshwal4419]

that's dolly not daaaaali

[@KennethC43]

Plus a machine could never see the disgust of humans like a law does because again the code is thousands of pages basically saying dont hurt or steal humans, so a machine would not be able to calculate why hurting and stealling humans is beneficial to humanity only a tyrant can see the good its doing harming and stealing from humanity.😢

[@GenXMetal_Head]

I am all for it if it gets me out of jury duty.

[@zenchiassassin283]

What about recommendation systems x), it’s related to behavior, personality

[@j.r.6517]

Before AI came to mind was Air India. Today it's a mind shift Artificial Intelligence. 😂

[@dhen-marccastillon923]

FRAU MARLISA AHL SA BERLIN AKUNG UTOK NAHIBALO TANAN NAA KOY GAHOM SA GINOO

[@Starman909]

If ai broke the law, no one would ever know? It not like Ai can go to jail?

[@A5tr0101]

AI will still be used for military though

[@davesnowdon3869]

Of course AI will abide by the law the same as our leaders do! 😂

[@aleje5761]

To me this is like colonials telling Indians it's only a few of us then all of a sudden the pilgrims came in loads. It's the excuse of oh it will be like this, we will have control over this. Until people get to laxed. A.I is Dangerous. Other planetary Civilizations fell to A.I. they gave their Sovereignty to it and died. People have become reliant on A.I that trying to talk to a real human operator is not as common. Frankly I get more done talking to a human than A.I.

[@ForkThe6]

China can literally immediately bring the same law if it exempts government, police and military from obeying it.

[@akshayjoseph5102]

Mustafa Suleyman right now🕺🕺

[@PaulMielcarz]

It looks rather solid. I expected some bloated, commie, paranoid shackles.

[@DG123z]

Yeah 🙄 Good luck.

[@defenderofnation6955]

Is the law was drafted by AI?!!!

[@RayHowle-jb1bi]

The first to destroy the world

[@ArunaKumari-sk3top]

#AIACT_UL