FITNA DAJJAL by Sheikh Tauseef Ur Rahman (full video lecture)

Dajjal ka Fitna kya hoga.....must watch.......Lecture by sheikh Tauseef ur rahmaan....For more videos please visit www.bestreligionislam.webs.com...

[@najamansari6221]

masha allah

[@imranrais1731]

Mashallah

[@MuhammadUmairShahzad]

JAzakAllah

[@kami4u11]

this only for thee and not for the believers (at large); We know what We have appointed for them as to their wives and the captives whom their right hands possess in order that there should be no difficulty for Thee. And Allah is Oft-Forgiving Most Merciful.

[@faizan8024]

who are those people who like the comment of Shetaan "Factszz"... i couldn't even believe that people can hit like to this comment....

[@nomaankhankhan3340]

assalamualaikum brother read quran & hadith with translation inshallah allah will guide you.

[@10011011110]

That sounds more like opinions. I agree Maulvis have forged a lot of things, even some things which they label as Tafsir that shouldn't be associated with the Quran. But read verse 3:7 of the Holy Quran again, because in that verse you will see that Allah reveals to some men the knowledge to understand Quran. No man can use his own opinions on the Quran, but when Allah himself explains something, as He said in the Quran He does, then when it is established one should not doubt it.

[@Factszz]

We have answered over 100 Questions that are usually posed by millions of blindly following sheeple fanatics at our following page. U shud spare time and read that page fully. For example in point 85 of that page, We hv discussed in detail WHAT IS MEANING OF, TO TO OBEY PROPHET?. Search in Google following line. That page will be first hit." A Great Page for Muslim Reverts - A Gift From

[@killuminati63]

@killuminati63 type in Fitna full movie !

[@Factszz]

Many fanatics misinterpret 3.7. Tht verse tells, There R verses in BOOK tht R foundation of BOOK & also R verses tht R allegorical but CROOKS twist allegorical verses in order to seek discord. Man of understanding cud any. u, me or ur neigbour. That verse never certifies that Ibne Kathir Tirmzi Bukhari [Abu Huraira whom Umar RA & Aisha declared a Thief, beggar & hadith forger] were men of understanding. Moreover never use one verse out of context but read whole Quran

[@killuminati63]

translation please ?

[@10011011110]

So you will doubt that every scholar of Islam since the inception of Islam, who tried their best to hold onto the words of the Holy Prophet (saw), did not preserve any of his words? Think about that for a bit. Yes, it was 200 years, but that was why there were chains of narrations and verification of narrators through those chains. Yes, the Holy Prophet (saw) completed his mission, but he also spoke, and people would've surely remembered some of those words.

[@10011011110]

The Quran also often says "Obey Allah and His Messenger". Tell me then, why is there any tafsir of the Quran in the first place? Every tafsir depends on transmitted reports or knowledge from the Prophet of Allah (saw). No one is allowed to make up their own tafsir. Scholars travelled far and wide and learned from many to know the interpretation of the Quran. If the Quran doesn't even have tafsir, then that screws up everyone's knowledge of the Quran since then we aren't certain of anything

[@10011011110]

If you want to try to get answers, go to the websites where you can ask the sheikhs questions and wait for their responses. There a lot of those websites on the net. You may or may not get a response. Try even going to a Masjid somewhere where there is a knowledgeable Imam or Muhaddith if you will. Someone oughta know the meaning. Don't just throw these Ahadith away completely without investigating into them properly.

[@Factszz]

Prophet completed his great mission wich ws ONLY&ONLY to deliver BOOK of Allah clearly[readQuran] & died 1400 yrs & that chapter is closed. Now U can follow a person when he is alive. U cannot follow a dead Prophet in person. But U can follow Prophet only if u follow THE BOOK that he left behind for us Quran. He did not leave any sunaHadith Book but Persians forged them after 300 yrs. To Follow Rasool & Allah is to Follow Quran. To follow Persian's forged Books mean to follow Parsi Persian Imams

[@10011011110]

The Holy Prophet (saw) said that the first 10 Ayahs of Surah Kahf are a prayer for safety against Dajjal. It follows that these verses give the identity of Dajjal. And they do, Dajjal is those people who attribute a son to Allah. There, mystery solved. It is the Christians who created a lie that Jesus is the son of God while the early Christians did not preach this, like the Ashab al-Kahf who believed in sincere monotheism. All signs of Dajjal are fulfilled in Christianity.

[@10011011110]

Not all Sahih Ahadith are Sahih. Only the Holy Qur'an is infallible. No one said that the Ahadith are infallible, if they did then they are wrong. Furthermore, knowing and referring to the commentaries is best as well. I fear Allah, so if I deny the sayings attributed to the Messenger of Allah (saw), then I would be guilty of disbelief. But if I investigate, then I have done my job as a Muslim. I am not a scholar, I just investigate the truth. I am still learning Arabic at present.

[@Factszz]

Re to2 3.7: i.e Salfi sect believes, Allah is sitting on ARSH in Samawaat in a remote villa bcz they take allegorical verse out of context &donot read whole Quran. Bcz Quran EXPLAINS ITSELF. So Arsh of Allah is explained more in other verses. i.e in Aytul-Kursi "Waasay-a-Kursio Husamawaate Wal-Ard. So his ARSH is limitless. HU is near to Neck Vein. If two he is 3rd, in 3 he is 4th, Nothing is like him. But Wahabi say Allah shapes like man. SO Men of THE KNOWLEDGE is who understand Quran by Quran

[@10011011110]

I think you shouldn't curse the Imams who did Tafaseer. Only Allah knows how righteous or not they were. So don't decide to curse them. A lot of teachings which highlight the Holy Quran are found in the Ahadith. I have heard people of your extreme who deny all Ahadith, and the other extreme who adopt every Hadith without question. One thing is for sure, whoever loved the Holy Prophet (saw) would certainly want to keep the memory of what he said and pass it on. Wouldnt you?

[@Factszz]

Part 01 of 2 1- Quran is best Hadith of Allah 39.23 & is also only authentic hadith of Prophet 69.40-47. All extra-Quranic hadths are forged lies; even if such hadiths do not contradict with Quran. There R mny apparently GOOD hadiths but wr forged, sending u Proof. 2- Quran is not BOOK of History tht will tell u long story of Dul-Quranain. What detail Quran gives is ENUF. If Quran does not tell name of Mother of Prophet, It is not mandatory in Islam to know that.

[@10011011110]

No, I still do not curse. We can only speculate as to how wrong a Hadith is based on Quran. You are suggesting that NO Sahabi from the time of the Holy Prophet (saw) EVER transmitted anything besides the Holy Qur'an. This is false. This is why I take knowledge from the Ahadith that do not contradict the Holy Quran. By the way, the chest suckling incident was a concession granted to only one man and by no one else after him, ever. And rajm is definitely not a verse in Quran, that one is false.

[@KingOvDeWorld]

Ap ke pas ilm hay to muje sirf aik ayat quote kar dain Quraan main se dajjal ke bare main...no hadees this time...no ahle hadees philosophy..main apki baat se agree kar lun ga...

[@10011011110]

You are entitled to your own view, and so am I. I have found that the signs of the Dajjal have happened exactly as prophesied. We are living in the latter age. I think you are way out of line calling the Muhadditheen forgers and liars. You have just labelled every scholar since the time of the Prophet (saw) as a liar, including the righteous Sahaba. I highly doubt your Iman, since you have none with calling the Prophet's followers liars and fabricators.

[@10011011110]

Again, these are just theories you have concocted. verses 5:40-47 speak of the Jewish law sent to Moses and the Prophets after him until Jesus. Verse 44 is proof against you because Allah speaks of how the rabbis and doctors of the law judged by the book. History tells us that they had extra books of tradition besides the Torah in their Jewish canon. So the Quran is quite clear that scholars come to protect the Holy Books, the Quran has the same promise in 15:9.

[@10011011110]

To continue... if Allah protected the Quran as per verse 15:9, then why do you think He did such a lousy job as to only send useless scholars for the past 1100 years? Has Islam been that dead to you in your mind? Do you consider that whoever taught you how to pray was wrong because no one knows how to pray from the Holy Prophet (saw)? You technically don't think anyone knows how to pray, because this has not been passed down in Islam either then.

[@KingOvDeWorld]

Dajjal is afsaana ! 100 Percent !...molvi sahab ne be shumar ahadees parhi hain...but aik hadh Quraani ayat bhe parh dain...Quraan main dajjal ka zikr nhe aaya...ye kesay ho sakta hay ke wo kitaab jo insaani mazi haal or kal ko khol khol kar byan karti hay us main dajjal ka zikr na kiya gya ho...agar zikr waqayi mojood nhe to Molana Modudi ki ye baat drust ha yke musalman apne mojooda hal ki fikr karain or is topic pe zyaada demag na lagayen...kuch baatain kam aqal logo ke liye nhe hoti...

[@KingOvDeWorld]

dajjal ka zikr Quraan pak main nhe hay...apko ilm nhe hay parho beth kr Quraan pak...

[@10011011110]

You have left no room to interpret Quran at all because from what you are saying, no history source is good enough, not even Ibn Hisham's works. Waqidi is already considered a liar, and Muhammad ibn Sad is somewhat reliable, with some false narrations, but you have discarded historical sources, dictionaries and transmitted traditions and its science. You have nothing left to understand the Quran. You do not live the in Prophet's time, you need these sources besides Quran to learn about it

[@kami4u11]

Tu bhai ap ye batao k aap kuch bhi gunah karlo aur paise de kar maaf karwa lo? ye konsa islam hai mirza saheb ka? aur jo aap k us qabristan me dafan hoga jis k qabar per saya hoga vo jannati hoga chahay zana karta ho? ye konsa islam hai? aap ka beta vo course parhe ga jo Mirza saheb k molvi bataenge? ye konsa islam hai? ap k bachon ko spy kia jaega jo k mirzai karte hain? ye konsa islam hai? Bhai ap hadith ka reference tu dena jis me likha hai k Isa Alaehe salam baad me inteqal kar gae thay???

[@ShahKhan1786]

His saying Allah izza wajal, idiot cant even say Allah Azza Wajal and here his explaining deen to people!!! Allahummahfadhna min!!!

[@10011011110]

Your throwing munafiq around at all the earlier Islamic scholars is a fulfilment of a Hadith about the latter age which says, "The people of the latter age in the Ummah will curse the earlier people of the Ummah". You have fulfilled this prophecy in my eyes, so you have opened my eyes to yet another sign. But, I suggest you move away from this. Read up on books about Ahadith and the sciences and look for proof in the Quran about what you say before speaking too much from ignorance.

[@kami4u11]

You jocker please give references dont misguide people. When did your religion came into existance? 200 years when British Empire made your father Mirza the owner of the new frenchise mirzai?

[@10011011110]

Your tone also shows you know nothing of what you speak about. Bring proof rather than state your hypothesis repeatedly. A hypothesis is no good without a proof. If your opinion is right, then no dictionary is good enough to use to explain the Quran either, because people wouldn't know the meanings of the words used in the Quran from the Prophet's time. Good luck trying to understand a 1400 year-old book in Arabic from modern Arabic, cause you'll fail miserably.

[@ShahKhan1786]

Just scream and corrupt everyones mind!! Typical Asian Corrupt (Scholar)!!!

[@MrMshoebkhan]

Mashallah