FIVE Law Enforcement Officers Attempt To Remove "SUSPICIOUS" Jounalist From Public! Huge FAIL!

[@Stacks5497]

That was epic when you tried to hand them the book of our CONSTITUTION . Classic

[@grantnoroyan4083]

YA the loser tries to be funny

[@schilling2438]

@grantnoroyan4083 just keep hate watching. The algorithm thanks you haha

[@narlyhunter]

💀Yahsir Sean-Paul the goat audit entertainer ever, Massive W in the chat, when he tried giving the book of the constitution I lost it 💀😂 these tyrant losers can hardly take a joke… why so serious 🤡?

[@AwesomeNuke]

@@grantnoroyan4083 You mean the loser who's protecting your freedom of speech right now, that allows you to type these things?

[@montanakid406]

More like "The Constitution for Dummies" ... Our founder's told us to organize our Constitutionally protected militias for a reason ... Sadly we didn't listen ... Shame on us !

[@jamesbraniff7834]

The younger sergeant couldn’t hide that he is a complete tyrant.

[@MustangWriter]

No...what he proved was you can't teach a man what he thinks he already knows. This is ignorance.

[@belair54]

I live a couple of towns away I hope I never run into him!

[@HardCold-Alquan]

Sean does not realize it going to these small towns, but many of these bad attitude cops are about more than violating people's rights, they outright don't like some people and they can hardly hide it.

[@bbarrera86]

Couldnt? didnt even try

[@Frank.Melendrez]

He doesn’t like freedom.

[@kevinjackson4464]

Six cops and no crime. Something doesn't seem right.

[@mikeburgh3956]

So they TRIED to make a crime and it didn't work.

[@yoo_zen]

​@@mikeburgh3956no, they wanted him to leave and he left! Fake audit!

[@mikeburgh3956]

@@yoo_zen No!! It was a successful audit. Audit fail because they called the pigs. But they didn't make him leave, he only left because I'm sure he has better things to do instead of hanging in a library all day. He did what he went there for. "A cop walk of shame" Edit: also I'm sure he was in there alot longer than vid shows, he edits them to shorten the vids. Alot of ppl don't like watching 1-2hr vids!

[@MWAclanGaming]

​@@yoo_zen He left on his own free will later not forced out, you loser.

[@yoo_zen]

@@mikeburgh3956 come on! Get real! The management refused to talk to him. She totally ignored him without any consequences. The cops kicked him out! The cops treated him like sh.t. without consequences. Only thing he did is to make a totally foolish argument with an ignorant cop. He lost that too. Nobody came out of this that cops shouldn't have been called. His behaviour is not suspicious! If he would go back the cops would show up again. They would still argue. The argument about the kids were pathetic. This auditor is uninformed , a fake, a sellout!

[@DonMinnesota]

Yep, definitely get Wilson’s complaint file, he absolutely has violated citizens rights.

[@scottthepoet9040]

oh his name was Wilson my mistake i thought it was Richard Head

[@gregkasza1925]

Him and Ben Dover are building a family together.@@scottthepoet9040

[@michaellobo4354]

Too Apree’s video came out first but I’m sure you’ll be first to get some justice

[@jaseallenson316]

Yeah, what a clown. Dude is the definition of a fire starter.

[@Green_loso]

You cant view a nj officers disciplinary record

[@Funvideo911Pennsylvania]

“I’m using the library for its intended purposes!!” 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 I love how LIA learns from the arguments against his actions from previous audits, and revises his words to make it harder for the government agencies to push legal actions against him. LIA is Iron Man!!!!

[@linsqopiring6816]

Yes, I kind of figured that out too from the weird way he kept on saying that even though I'm not familiar with those other cases. If the auditing community continues to learn and grow it will only become more powerful.

[@benhuizar2194]

Well the bottom line is cops don't a fraction of what they should know about the law and usually know nothing at all about the constitution and there running around with guns enforce whatever the fuck they want, I just watched a video of a cop pulling a gun on a man ride a kick scooter on the sidewalk,

[@steviewonder8624]

Yes, years of auditing refines the processes and improves the word skills. It's a shame that needs to happen simply to protect your rights under the constitution.

[@samuellane8691]

I NEVER again want to hear a police department say, "We're short-handed!"

[@mr.duanesharpe]

For real. Sean was right. That was overkill and that last cop was super disrespectful and disingenuous. The children ! 🤦‍♀️

[@bozee1287]

The sergeant was annoyed as he was busy eating donuts previously..

[@lzxray6781]

Every department is over staffed, they only cry about being understaffed when they want more money, which means an increase in taxes. No department is ever short handed, I think that towns under the population of 5-7K shouldn't even have departments, the county sheriffs department can patrol those towns.

[@samuellane8691]

Yeah. Thee always plenty of psychopaths anxious to put on that badge.

[@laborer8815]

The department in my town has been whining about being shorthanded for 3 years.

[@todddoetken2594]

This police department is extremely overstaffed with a bunch of buffoons.

[@grantnoroyan4083]

YEP ANOTHER BUFFOON LIKE SEAN PAUL REYES! TRUE

[@babyblueLEGEND]

It seems to me that many of these P.D.s serve the purpose of "welfare" for a certain class of people. Its a jobs program for a lot of mid to low intellect people.

[@suicyco4life666]

That seems to be the standard in most cases.

[@todddoetken2594]

@@suicyco4life666 - It is in my hometown of Burlington, Iowa.

[@evelyndaisy9722]

Definitely

[@gregoryk.9815]

If a library doesn't want to be open to the public they can freely return all the taxpayers money.

[@urgreatestenemy]

You should understand that public property doesn't mean that the property is always open to the public a military base for example is public property, but it restricts access to the general public. In Kreimer v. Board of Police of Morristown, NJ, an important court opinion addressing a library user’s right to enter and use the library, the court held that because public libraries are a limited public forum, constitutional protection is afforded only to those expressive activities that are consistent with the mission and purpose of the library. A public library is only obligated to permit the public to exercise rights that are consistent with the government’s intent in establishing the library as a limited public forum for the purpose of receiving information and accessing the library’s books, programs, and online resources. According to the Kreimer opinion, other activities, including activities such as photography, filming, petition-gathering, assemblies, and public speeches, may be regulated by the library using reasonable, viewpoint neutral, time, place, and manner rules. Brown v. Louisiana, (1966). A library is "a place dedicated to quiet, to knowledge, and to beauty." Its very purpose is to aid in the acquisition of knowledge through reading, writing and quiet contemplation. Thus, the exercise of other oral and interactive First Amendment activities is antithetical to the nature of the Library. These arguably conflicting characteristics, at least in a First Amendment sense, support our conclusion that the Library constitutes a limited public forum, a sub-category of designated public fora.21 See Brody v. Spang, at 1118. We thus adopt the reasoning of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Travis v. Owego-Apalachin School District, 927 F.2d 688 (2d Cir. 1991), where the court held that a limited public forum "is created when government opens a nonpublic forum but limits the expressive activity to certain kinds of speakers or to the discussion of certain subjects.... In the case of a limited public forum, constitutional protection is afforded only to expressive activity of a genre similar to those that government has admitted to the limited forum." Id. at 692 (emphasis supplied).22 Hence, as a limited public forum, the Library is obligated only to permit the public to exercise rights that are consistent with the nature of the Library and consistent with the government's intent in designating the Library as a public forum.23 Other activities need not be tolerated. Adderley v. Florida the Supreme court ruled in that case that the state can own property and they have a right to restrict access to the property at anytime. Understand policies are not laws, but you can be trespassed from any building for not following their policies. For example, the policy of no shoes, no shirt, no service, has been around for years. Where it is not a law you must wear shoes if you break the policy they can deny you service. Once you are denied service you can not use the building in its intended purposes so you can be trespassed. It doesn't matter if the place is public what matters is what type of fourm the government has designated to the place. The Supreme Court established three different types of public forums in Perry Education Association v. Perry Local Educators' Association (1983): traditional, limited and nonpublic. Limited and nonpublic fourms can limit the use of the public space to its designed purpose, and can even reasonably restrict or limit a person's first amendment rights. Courts have ruled that filming is subject to Time, Place, and Manner if the place is a nonpublic forum filming can be restricted. A missconception is being passed around the internet that you can not be trespassed from public property unless you violate a law, this is not the case anyone can be trespassed from a space for not following the rules or policies posted within the space. Each state has their own trespassing laws you should read the law in your state to better understand the law many states leave the law vague on when a person is guilty of criminal trespassing. Where you do have a right to film, it is not absolute the government reserves the option to limit a person's rights in certain spaces they designate as nonpublic forums. Typically nonpublic forums are established inside Courthouses, Libraries, Schools, and Universities but can be expanded to include other public spaces. Glik v. Cunniffe, 655 F.3d 78 (1st Cir. 2011) is a case in which the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit held that a private citizen has the right to record video and audio of police carrying out their duties in a public place, and that the arrest of the citizen for a wiretapping violation violated his First and Fourth Amendment rights and held that a citizen has the right to film public officials in a public place; the public's right of access to information is coextensive with that of the press. This case upholds that every citizen has equal rights to film in public places as the press. However, the court also noted that the right to film public officials was subject to reasonable limitations with respect to the time, place and manner in which the recording was conducted. This means everyone has equal rights to film the press are granted no extra privileges wherever a citizen is restricted in filming the press are bound to obey the same limitations. Now lets get into filming the courts have ruled filming is a person's right, but that right can be limited by Time Place and Manner restrictions. Where you have the right to film in most public spaces anywhere a person can reasonably expect privacy filming can be restricted. For example, a restroom is a public space open to the general public, but filming inside a restroom is illegal. Now lets get into why they can film but you can't. Where they do have security cameras thoses recordings are not public they are not publicly accessible and uploaded to social media sites, but a person can request the footage. When a person requests the footage they look at the reason the person wants the footage, if there is good cause and it is decided to release the footage, it is the job of the Custodian of records to review the footage and ensure it contains no private information, if it does it can be edited to remove names addresses and blur out faces to protect people's identities. This is not the case of third parties they do not have a responsibility to protect the libraries patrons, if a employee releases footage that contains private information, that employee can be fired for disobeying their policies. Where they can not fire a person who doesn't work there for breaking a policy they can trespass the person from the property to ensure the privacy of their users remain safe from unnecessary exposure. Where you have no expectation of privacy in most public spaces nonpublic forums recognize there are some spaces where a person can expect a limited amount of privacy in public and the need to protect that right to privacy. Libraries are not only places to check out books they are places where people do research and develop new ideas and theories or work on inventions. Because people bring a lot of intellectual property into Libraries and Universities the government employees are obligated to try and protect peoples intellectual property from unnecessary exposure. If people are live streaming to a social media site and purposefully or accidentally film personal intellectual property there is a risk of that information being stolen or being plagiarized by others. Libraries also have policies that the American Library Association (ALA) have put in place and a libraries Bill of Rights, this the the ALA'S position on privacy. "Privacy is essential to free inquiry in the library because it enables library users to select, access, and consider information and ideas without fear of embarrassment, judgment, punishment, or ostracism. A lack of privacy in what one reads and views in the library can have a significant chilling effect upon library users’ willingness to exercise their First Amendment right to read, thereby impairing free access to ideas. True liberty of choice in the library requires both a varied selection of materials and the assurance that one's choices are not monitored. The possibility of surveillance, whether direct or through access to records of speech, research and exploration, undermines a democratic society. One cannot exercise the right to read if the possible consequences include damage to one's reputation, ostracism from the community or workplace, or criminal penalties. Choice requires both a varied selection and the assurance that one's choice is not monitored. For libraries to flourish as centers for uninhibited access to information, librarians must stand behind their users' right to privacy and freedom of inquiry." I encourage people to look up all the information I've provided before you comment it is important to know your rights, and it is just as important to know when and where your rights can be limited.

[@MWAclanGaming]

​@@urgreatestenemyit's is not the same my friend. There a reason why the military has it's own police and court system vs civilian police and court system.

[@neil_mch]

Thay can start with that haughty director resigning.

[@urgreatestenemy]

@MWAclanGaming Public property just means it was paid for by tax dollars it doesn't mean it is open to the general public. You can look it up just because it is public property that doesn't give people the right to access the property for example a park is public property it doesn't mean it can not close to the public and restrict access to it. You don't own public property the state owns the land they have the right to restrict access to their properties just as a citizen has the right to restrict access to their own property.

[@urgreatestenemy]

@user-bf8tv8xv4w Unfortunately a lot of auditors already know this information, but they don't want to tell people about the public forum doctrine as it hurts their case that they have a right to film anywhere they want. I'm actually surprised this post stayed as YT for some reason usually removes most of my posts when it comes to certain topics. Could be because I get negative feed back as I tell the truth, I guess some people don't like to hear that their right to film can be limited to protect the privacy rights of others.

[@michaela6147]

that sergeant is an absolute liability

[@Laphius]

Asking for ID just to “look you up” for fun is creepier than recording children.

[@LD__2416]

Psychiatrists label narcissists as the equivalent of child molesters.

[@LincolnHawke]

Yes, because of these FBI FUSION CENTERS. EVERYTIME your name hits NCIC OR CLETS, IT ADDS TO YOUR Overall Library Card. The fbi actually calls that. Predictive Policing is the scariest thing I've been around. The bigger cities have to ban the algorithm. (Pred Pol)(Geolotica) Because it goes against the constitution. Bigger cities are more educated. The smaller cities who are still PARTICIPATING IN THIS DYSTOPIA need to be sued till the cows home. They can get away with it bc their population is not educated. Modesto CA is ranked 147th out of 150 cities to be uneducated in America!! But has and has 14 drones, a surveillance airplane with $200k of cameras on a $200k plane. Over 50 live cameras. Over 200+ ALPRs.. and a civilian police force that follows their neighbors. Registered RING DOORBELLs to use for surveillance on unsuspecting neighbors.. and using these Neighbors apps to abuse and harass anyone they want. In the guise of predicting police. Targets Americans to the point they want to lose it. It's perfect the homeless. Mental illness situations. They are actually EXTERMINATING PEOPLE LIKE PESTS. AND BRAGGING IT'S THE FIRST PROGRAM IN THE NATION. NATIONAL STORY, HOMELESS PPL ARE LITERALLY HIDING ON THE SIDE OF THE TUOLUMNE RIVER. DIGGING OUT ELABORATE CAVES. HELICOPTERS AND FACE RECOGNITION OR VIDEO ANALYTICS IS HAVING WEARING MASKS. It's so scary because social justice is the norm and actually train ppl. And they think it's a constitutional protected activity. It's not.

[@TRICHOMETRIST]

And the ID is for retaliation

[@cottonmouth71]

LIA was100% right [as a viewer] ,I could tell that the Sgt. had nothing but disdain for LIA and his passive aggressive demeanor was coming through [on the video] in a BIG way !

[@gerrydoherty52]

Finks a weird guy...might be worth a look at his hard drive

[@tDes865]

The sergeant with the ticks, arguing, needs to be fired immediately. Dudes ego is so fragile. The library director is a total Karen as well. Her ego won’t allow her to be wrong and have a conversation..fire them both.

[@slippinjimmy9052]

Without pension

[@damiensky4259]

"Her ego won’t allow her to be wrong" I have met a lot of woman who are like this, it's common with woman it seems !!

[@boardwalkjohnnie4952]

They both look like they’re in the same wiccan cult. Very common in that area of jersey.

[@joy4118]

I agree. Both are a huge waste of tax dollars.

[@wigalert]

Sour turd servants

[@Bricolagemayhem]

The sgt says there’s no reason to bring up hypotheticals when that’s all he’s done since he showed up

[@dsprg]

His entire career is a hypothetical. How he stole those stripes is certainly it's own mystery 🕵‍♂️

[@ironshoes1720]

He was willing to say anything to get the desired outcome : get the auditor out of the library. He was ready to say anything, invoke feelings, make assumptions, etc. He wasn't arguing reasonably, he wasn't even listening. He already had his mind made up in favor of the library director, that's it. 🤦🏻‍♂️

[@FreeUkraine69]

Deflection 101@@dsprg

[@FreeUkraine69]

Deflection 101@@ironshoes1720

[@contrac4u]

Especially bringing up recording kids or the school a block away... smh

[@maggiemae6867]

" The Constitution Explained " ~ GOLDEN!!!! The walk of shame

[@michaelwaddell9461]

Library director needs to be dismissed. ASAP. NO Public money to traitors.

[@ronberman8947]

She's probably been library director for 30 years. There needs to be " term limits " for anyone who holds public office and is in a position of power.." Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely "

[@urgreatestenemy]

In Kreimer v. Board of Police of Morristown, NJ, an important court opinion addressing a library user’s right to enter and use the library, the court held that because public libraries are a limited public forum, constitutional protection is afforded only to those expressive activities that are consistent with the mission and purpose of the library. A public library is only obligated to permit the public to exercise rights that are consistent with the government’s intent in establishing the library as a limited public forum for the purpose of receiving information and accessing the library’s books, programs, and online resources. According to the Kreimer opinion, other activities, including activities such as photography, filming, petition-gathering, assemblies, and public speeches, may be regulated by the library using reasonable, viewpoint neutral, time, place, and manner rules. Brown v. Louisiana, 383 U.S. 131, 142, 86 S. Ct. 719, 724, 15 L. Ed. 2d 637 (1966). A library is "a place dedicated to quiet, to knowledge, and to beauty." Its very purpose is to aid in the acquisition of knowledge through reading, writing and quiet contemplation. Thus, the exercise of other oral and interactive First Amendment activities is antithetical to the nature of the Library. These arguably conflicting characteristics, at least in a First Amendment sense, support our conclusion that the Library constitutes a limited public forum, a sub-category of designated public fora.21 See Brody v. Spang, at 1118. We thus adopt the reasoning of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Travis v. Owego-Apalachin School District, 927 F.2d 688 (2d Cir. 1991), where the court held that a limited public forum "is created when government opens a nonpublic forum but limits the expressive activity to certain kinds of speakers or to the discussion of certain subjects.... In the case of a limited public forum, constitutional protection is afforded only to expressive activity of a genre similar to those that government has admitted to the limited forum." Id. at 692 (emphasis supplied).22 Hence, as a limited public forum, the Library is obligated only to permit the public to exercise rights that are consistent with the nature of the Library and consistent with the government's intent in designating the Library as a public forum.23 Other activities need not be tolerated. Adderley v. Florida the Supreme court ruled in that case that the state can own property and they have a right to restrict access to the property at anytime. Understand policies are not laws, but you can be trespassed from any building for not following their policies. For example, the policy of no shoes, no shirt, no service, has been around for years. Where it is not a law you must wear shoes if you break the policy they can deny you service. Once you are denied service you can not use the building in its intended purposes so you can be trespassed. It doesn't matter if the place is public what matters is what type of fourm the government has designated to the place. The Supreme Court established three different types of public forums in Perry Education Association v. Perry Local Educators' Association (1983): traditional, limited and nonpublic. Limited and nonpublic fourms can limit the use of the public space to its designed purpose, and can even reasonably restrict or limit a person's first amendment rights. Courts have ruled that filming is subject to Time, Place, and Manner if the place is a nonpublic forum filming can be restricted. A missconception is being passed around the internet that you can not be trespassed from public property unless you violate a law, this is not the case anyone can be trespassed from a space for not following the rules or policies posted within the space. Each state has their own trespassing laws you should read the law in your state to better understand the law many states leave the law vague on when a person is guilty of criminal trespassing. Where you do have a right to film, it is not absolute the government reserves the option to limit a person's rights in certain spaces they designate as nonpublic forums. Typically nonpublic forums are established inside Courthouses, Libraries, Schools, and Universities but can be expanded to include other public spaces. Glik v. Cunniffe, 655 F.3d 78 (1st Cir. 2011) is a case in which the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit held that a private citizen has the right to record video and audio of police carrying out their duties in a public place, and that the arrest of the citizen for a wiretapping violation violated his First and Fourth Amendment rights and held that a citizen has the right to film public officials in a public place; the public's right of access to information is coextensive with that of the press. This case upholds that every citizen has equal rights to film in public places as the press. However, the court also noted that the right to film public officials was subject to reasonable limitations with respect to the time, place and manner in which the recording was conducted. This means everyone has equal rights to film the press are granted no extra privileges wherever a citizen is restricted in filming the press are bound to obey the same limitations. Now lets get into filming the courts have ruled filming is a person's right, but that right can be limited by Time Place and Manner restrictions. Where you have the right to film in most public spaces anywhere a person can reasonably expect privacy filming can be restricted. For example, a restroom is a public space open to the general public, but filming inside a restroom is illegal. Now lets get into why they can film but you can't. Where they do have security cameras thoses recordings are not public they are not publicly accessible and uploaded to social media sites, but a person can request the footage. When a person requests the footage they look at the reason the person wants the footage, if there is good cause and it is decided to release the footage, it is the job of the Custodian of records to review the footage and ensure it contains no private information, if it does it can be edited to remove names addresses and blur out faces to protect people's identities. This is not the case of third parties they do not have a responsibility to protect the libraries patrons, if a employee releases footage that contains private information, that employee can be fired for disobeying their policies. Where they can not fire a person who doesn't work there for breaking a policy they can trespass the person from the property to ensure the privacy of their users remain safe from unnecessary exposure. Where you have no expectation of privacy in most public spaces nonpublic forums recognize there are some spaces where a person can expect a limited amount of privacy in public and the need to protect that right to privacy. Libraries are not only places to check out books they are places where people do research and develop new ideas and theories or work on inventions. Because people bring a lot of intellectual property into Libraries and Universities the government employees are obligated to try and protect peoples intellectual property from unnecessary exposure. If people are live streaming to a social media site and purposefully or accidentally film personal intellectual property there is a risk of that information being stolen or being plagiarized by others. Libraries also have policies that the American Library Association (ALA) have put in place and a libraries Bill of Rights, this the the ALA'S position on privacy. "Privacy is essential to free inquiry in the library because it enables library users to select, access, and consider information and ideas without fear of embarrassment, judgment, punishment, or ostracism. A lack of privacy in what one reads and views in the library can have a significant chilling effect upon library users’ willingness to exercise their First Amendment right to read, thereby impairing free access to ideas. True liberty of choice in the library requires both a varied selection of materials and the assurance that one's choices are not monitored. The possibility of surveillance, whether direct or through access to records of speech, research and exploration, undermines a democratic society. One cannot exercise the right to read if the possible consequences include damage to one's reputation, ostracism from the community or workplace, or criminal penalties. Choice requires both a varied selection and the assurance that one's choice is not monitored. For libraries to flourish as centers for uninhibited access to information, librarians must stand behind their users' right to privacy and freedom of inquiry." I encourage people to look up all the information I've provided before you comment it is important to know your rights, and it is just as important to know when and where your rights can be limited.

[@alansmith7192]

@@ronberman8947 But Rhett. What shall I do. Where shall I go?

[@jhard94]

Go watch “Too Apree” do his audit on this same Library lmao it’s hilarious. He just dropped the video as well.

[@wadestanton]

there were no people taking shelter from the cold, at the Library. There might be something more sinister going on than US Constitutional violations.

[@floridabill6088]

That Sargeant is a tyrant. He tried to escalate but you didn't budge.

[@michielotsen6317]

Amen

[@Thadude701]

That Sargent was seething he was so upset to be told he could leave .

[@juneskywalker5847]

Imagine being a cop and being worried about filming kids in public buildings yet the child trafficking has already surpassed the illegal drugs trade under law enforcements watch or participation. Let that sink in people...

[@andrewcosyn]

He's a complete idiot.

[@user-zc9zt2vl5s]

Sgt Wilson is such an embarassment. Every word that comes out of his mouth is utter nonsense. How did he ever become a police officer? People like this should get a different job. He's not fit or smart enough to be a cop. Thanks for exposing these hypocritical idiots that have no common sense or logic. They're a bunch of brainwash fools. A reflection of the government. Pathetic.

[@kenleehensley7360]

An officer following you around the library is a form of harassment and intimidation

[@LarryMay-j5r]

Maybe those cops are gay

[@groovin4real]

That Sargent is a loose cannon. If he hasn't already? He's going to cost tax payers a lot of money.

[@jackc70]

And he doesn’t care. He will face no punishment or financial loss

[@candicebain9453]

The "police manager" handled Asif Khan better. He helped him get his footage.

[@candicebain9453]

He still violated Too Apree's rights.

[@robinblackmoor8732]

In 2022, New York city paid out over $220 million for police misconduct. There were 10 payouts that were over $6 million each.

[@unlimitedrabbit]

*Sergeant

[@SingleMaltBuckeye]

"She doesn't want to speak to you." Why can't I speak to her? "I can't speak on her behalf." Lmao he ran right into that one. What a doofus. Lol

[@stuffbenlikes]

Library director is extremely rude. She should not have that job, she can't handle dealing with the public.

[@foilsaintfoils6071]

I agree. THIS is the main takeaway from this audit. She needs to be replaced with a human

[@nowayoutstp4]

True and important to point out. ☝️

[@Vic-zp5ft]

most probably cause shes not doing anything the whole day and gets exposed

[@br7666]

I guarantee that ignoring cnty attitude is no where to be seen when she greedily grabs her pay check that we all pay for. Absolute subhuman.

[@justinknighton-po4vn]

What are you going to video, the homeless watching porn on the internet

[@kennichols3992]

Since when is it permissible for the government to monitor the legal activities of a citizen inside a public library?

[@bishophavel9048]

It is kind of gestapo like, but they are within their right.

[@notthatronjohnson1187]

Sgt Wilson and his attitude is a good example of why so many people don't respect or trust them.

[@jhard94]

Go watch “Too Apree” do his audit on this same Library lmao it’s hilarious. He just dropped the video as well.

[@LD__2416]

That first cop "Blum" was funny to see him ask Sean some leading questions and then when he didnt get the answer he was fishing for he finally just outright asks "where are you from" LOL. The entitlement to your personal information is astounding. I hope this guy teaches his kids Stranger Danger even though he is trained to act like that exact person.

[@vivianewing7154]

people don't respect them, don't like them and often hate them as they are not accountable for their actions and hide behind qualified immunity and the thin blue line gang mafia

[@christopheredge2111]

The policy is unconstitutional. The library is violating civil rights. Law enforcement should never enforce unconstitutional policies.

[@KennyRyman]

Same thing in Houston...

[@MrBeevee5]

And that, is the problem.

[@Lemonarmpits]

Captain obvious

[@richieslocum2286]

yet, they do it every day...

[@cypeman8037]

REALLY?

[@MiMi-nz8km]

Wow, that Sergeant was a doushe bag! Great work Sean as always

[@jasonwilliams3967]

Library Director Eleese Fink (appropriate last name) is a perfect example of the entrenched bureaucracy in this country that represents a true existential threat to our Constitutional rights...

[@salt6]

That Sgt was really struggling to hold his ego in check.

[@kevinvesey5263]

I would say he didn’t.

[@kft4764]

Not struggling, completely failing

[@JamesFarrow-r3e]

He's stupid, just not that stupid in this day and age.

[@DavidBrown-nv3tw]

The Sgt. Is a total wank*r filled with ego and -GROSS IGNORANCE !

[@malditomalo619]

that Sgt. needs a serious reminder by his superiors that his job is to Defend and Support the U.S. Constitution PERIOD!

[@dianheffernan5704]

Very well said.

[@RobertTurner-i8x]

HE KNOWS HE JUST DOESN'T CARE

[@ByeByeBS]

What makes you think that his superiors are any different than he is?

[@hydroy1]

No, he NEEDS a permanent black mark in his conduct jacket!.

[@montebrodie4086]

That isnt their job. They took an oath to defend the constitution, but their job is to investigate crimes and make arrests.

[@sirjag2922]

The Constitution is like kryptonite to uneducated public servants.

[@urgreatestenemy]

In Kreimer v. Board of Police of Morristown, NJ, an important court opinion addressing a library user’s right to enter and use the library, the court held that because public libraries are a limited public forum, constitutional protection is afforded only to those expressive activities that are consistent with the mission and purpose of the library. A public library is only obligated to permit the public to exercise rights that are consistent with the government’s intent in establishing the library as a limited public forum for the purpose of receiving information and accessing the library’s books, programs, and online resources. According to the Kreimer opinion, other activities, including activities such as photography, filming, petition-gathering, assemblies, and public speeches, may be regulated by the library using reasonable, viewpoint neutral, time, place, and manner rules. Brown v. Louisiana, 383 U.S. 131, 142, 86 S. Ct. 719, 724, 15 L. Ed. 2d 637 (1966). A library is "a place dedicated to quiet, to knowledge, and to beauty." Its very purpose is to aid in the acquisition of knowledge through reading, writing and quiet contemplation. Thus, the exercise of other oral and interactive First Amendment activities is antithetical to the nature of the Library. These arguably conflicting characteristics, at least in a First Amendment sense, support our conclusion that the Library constitutes a limited public forum, a sub-category of designated public fora.21 See Brody v. Spang, at 1118. We thus adopt the reasoning of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Travis v. Owego-Apalachin School District, 927 F.2d 688 (2d Cir. 1991), where the court held that a limited public forum "is created when government opens a nonpublic forum but limits the expressive activity to certain kinds of speakers or to the discussion of certain subjects.... In the case of a limited public forum, constitutional protection is afforded only to expressive activity of a genre similar to those that government has admitted to the limited forum." Id. at 692 (emphasis supplied).22 Hence, as a limited public forum, the Library is obligated only to permit the public to exercise rights that are consistent with the nature of the Library and consistent with the government's intent in designating the Library as a public forum.23 Other activities need not be tolerated. Adderley v. Florida the Supreme court ruled in that case that the state can own property and they have a right to restrict access to the property at anytime. Understand policies are not laws, but you can be trespassed from any building for not following their policies. For example, the policy of no shoes, no shirt, no service, has been around for years. Where it is not a law you must wear shoes if you break the policy they can deny you service. Once you are denied service you can not use the building in its intended purposes so you can be trespassed. It doesn't matter if the place is public what matters is what type of fourm the government has designated to the place. The Supreme Court established three different types of public forums in Perry Education Association v. Perry Local Educators' Association (1983): traditional, limited and nonpublic. Limited and nonpublic fourms can limit the use of the public space to its designed purpose, and can even reasonably restrict or limit a person's first amendment rights. Courts have ruled that filming is subject to Time, Place, and Manner if the place is a nonpublic forum filming can be restricted. A missconception is being passed around the internet that you can not be trespassed from public property unless you violate a law, this is not the case anyone can be trespassed from a space for not following the rules or policies posted within the space. Each state has their own trespassing laws you should read the law in your state to better understand the law many states leave the law vague on when a person is guilty of criminal trespassing. Where you do have a right to film, it is not absolute the government reserves the option to limit a person's rights in certain spaces they designate as nonpublic forums. Typically nonpublic forums are established inside Courthouses, Libraries, Schools, and Universities but can be expanded to include other public spaces. Glik v. Cunniffe, 655 F.3d 78 (1st Cir. 2011) is a case in which the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit held that a private citizen has the right to record video and audio of police carrying out their duties in a public place, and that the arrest of the citizen for a wiretapping violation violated his First and Fourth Amendment rights and held that a citizen has the right to film public officials in a public place; the public's right of access to information is coextensive with that of the press. This case upholds that every citizen has equal rights to film in public places as the press. However, the court also noted that the right to film public officials was subject to reasonable limitations with respect to the time, place and manner in which the recording was conducted. This means everyone has equal rights to film the press are granted no extra privileges wherever a citizen is restricted in filming the press are bound to obey the same limitations. Now lets get into filming the courts have ruled filming is a person's right, but that right can be limited by Time Place and Manner restrictions. Where you have the right to film in most public spaces anywhere a person can reasonably expect privacy filming can be restricted. For example, a restroom is a public space open to the general public, but filming inside a restroom is illegal. Now lets get into why they can film but you can't. Where they do have security cameras thoses recordings are not public they are not publicly accessible and uploaded to social media sites, but a person can request the footage. When a person requests the footage they look at the reason the person wants the footage, if there is good cause and it is decided to release the footage, it is the job of the Custodian of records to review the footage and ensure it contains no private information, if it does it can be edited to remove names addresses and blur out faces to protect people's identities. This is not the case of third parties they do not have a responsibility to protect the libraries patrons, if a employee releases footage that contains private information, that employee can be fired for disobeying their policies. Where they can not fire a person who doesn't work there for breaking a policy they can trespass the person from the property to ensure the privacy of their users remain safe from unnecessary exposure. Where you have no expectation of privacy in most public spaces nonpublic forums recognize there are some spaces where a person can expect a limited amount of privacy in public and the need to protect that right to privacy. Libraries are not only places to check out books they are places where people do research and develop new ideas and theories or work on inventions. Because people bring a lot of intellectual property into Libraries and Universities the government employees are obligated to try and protect peoples intellectual property from unnecessary exposure. If people are live streaming to a social media site and purposefully or accidentally film personal intellectual property there is a risk of that information being stolen or being plagiarized by others. Libraries also have policies that the American Library Association (ALA) have put in place and a libraries Bill of Rights, this the the ALA'S position on privacy. "Privacy is essential to free inquiry in the library because it enables library users to select, access, and consider information and ideas without fear of embarrassment, judgment, punishment, or ostracism. A lack of privacy in what one reads and views in the library can have a significant chilling effect upon library users’ willingness to exercise their First Amendment right to read, thereby impairing free access to ideas. True liberty of choice in the library requires both a varied selection of materials and the assurance that one's choices are not monitored. The possibility of surveillance, whether direct or through access to records of speech, research and exploration, undermines a democratic society. One cannot exercise the right to read if the possible consequences include damage to one's reputation, ostracism from the community or workplace, or criminal penalties. Choice requires both a varied selection and the assurance that one's choice is not monitored. For libraries to flourish as centers for uninhibited access to information, librarians must stand behind their users' right to privacy and freedom of inquiry." I encourage people to look up all the information I've provided before you comment it is important to know your rights, and it is just as important to know when and where your rights can be limited.

[@MeMe-zb5lf]

The handing of the book...AMAZING

[@gregkasza1925]

That one cop tried to pretend that he was there for the safety of the children. He’s a flat out LIAR. he’s not the hero he wants to be.

[@ChristiaanC458]

You mean that Nobody 🤯🤡

[@ByeByeBS]

But there were imaginary children there. They were hiding in the stacks.

[@8minato]

It doesn’t even make sense cause as Sean said there are children everywhere he could be out on the street filming and a child passes by.

[@joy4118]

Americans and cops need to quit with the "filming of children" nonsense.

[@ByeByeBS]

@@8minato It's not supposed to make any sense. It's only supposed to f--- with your mind.

[@jeffragar3493]

Librarians are supposed to be the staunchest advocates for our free speach rights. Shame on that administrator.

[@georgeb1364]

Visually, she projected a very self-righteous condescending attitude

[@joe-ut9kb]

That must be why the books you take out and computer use is sent to a government database.

[@belair54]

@@joe-ut9kb Really?

[@HardCold-Alquan]

Shockingly, they get paid a whole lot for a job that would normally pay $15 an hour at a book store. No wonder they have bad attitudes, even though most are outcast geeks.

[@urgreatestenemy]

In Kreimer v. Board of Police of Morristown, NJ, an important court opinion addressing a library user’s right to enter and use the library, the court held that because public libraries are a limited public forum, constitutional protection is afforded only to those expressive activities that are consistent with the mission and purpose of the library. A public library is only obligated to permit the public to exercise rights that are consistent with the government’s intent in establishing the library as a limited public forum for the purpose of receiving information and accessing the library’s books, programs, and online resources. According to the Kreimer opinion, other activities, including activities such as photography, filming, petition-gathering, assemblies, and public speeches, may be regulated by the library using reasonable, viewpoint neutral, time, place, and manner rules. Brown v. Louisiana, 383 U.S. 131, 142, 86 S. Ct. 719, 724, 15 L. Ed. 2d 637 (1966). A library is "a place dedicated to quiet, to knowledge, and to beauty." Its very purpose is to aid in the acquisition of knowledge through reading, writing and quiet contemplation. Thus, the exercise of other oral and interactive First Amendment activities is antithetical to the nature of the Library. These arguably conflicting characteristics, at least in a First Amendment sense, support our conclusion that the Library constitutes a limited public forum, a sub-category of designated public fora.21 See Brody v. Spang, at 1118. We thus adopt the reasoning of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Travis v. Owego-Apalachin School District, 927 F.2d 688 (2d Cir. 1991), where the court held that a limited public forum "is created when government opens a nonpublic forum but limits the expressive activity to certain kinds of speakers or to the discussion of certain subjects.... In the case of a limited public forum, constitutional protection is afforded only to expressive activity of a genre similar to those that government has admitted to the limited forum." Id. at 692 (emphasis supplied).22 Hence, as a limited public forum, the Library is obligated only to permit the public to exercise rights that are consistent with the nature of the Library and consistent with the government's intent in designating the Library as a public forum.23 Other activities need not be tolerated. Adderley v. Florida the Supreme court ruled in that case that the state can own property and they have a right to restrict access to the property at anytime. Understand policies are not laws, but you can be trespassed from any building for not following their policies. For example, the policy of no shoes, no shirt, no service, has been around for years. Where it is not a law you must wear shoes if you break the policy they can deny you service. Once you are denied service you can not use the building in its intended purposes so you can be trespassed. It doesn't matter if the place is public what matters is what type of fourm the government has designated to the place. The Supreme Court established three different types of public forums in Perry Education Association v. Perry Local Educators' Association (1983): traditional, limited and nonpublic. Limited and nonpublic fourms can limit the use of the public space to its designed purpose, and can even reasonably restrict or limit a person's first amendment rights. Courts have ruled that filming is subject to Time, Place, and Manner if the place is a nonpublic forum filming can be restricted. A missconception is being passed around the internet that you can not be trespassed from public property unless you violate a law, this is not the case anyone can be trespassed from a space for not following the rules or policies posted within the space. Each state has their own trespassing laws you should read the law in your state to better understand the law many states leave the law vague on when a person is guilty of criminal trespassing. Where you do have a right to film, it is not absolute the government reserves the option to limit a person's rights in certain spaces they designate as nonpublic forums. Typically nonpublic forums are established inside Courthouses, Libraries, Schools, and Universities but can be expanded to include other public spaces. Glik v. Cunniffe, 655 F.3d 78 (1st Cir. 2011) is a case in which the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit held that a private citizen has the right to record video and audio of police carrying out their duties in a public place, and that the arrest of the citizen for a wiretapping violation violated his First and Fourth Amendment rights and held that a citizen has the right to film public officials in a public place; the public's right of access to information is coextensive with that of the press. This case upholds that every citizen has equal rights to film in public places as the press. However, the court also noted that the right to film public officials was subject to reasonable limitations with respect to the time, place and manner in which the recording was conducted. This means everyone has equal rights to film the press are granted no extra privileges wherever a citizen is restricted in filming the press are bound to obey the same limitations. Now lets get into filming the courts have ruled filming is a person's right, but that right can be limited by Time Place and Manner restrictions. Where you have the right to film in most public spaces anywhere a person can reasonably expect privacy filming can be restricted. For example, a restroom is a public space open to the general public, but filming inside a restroom is illegal. Now lets get into why they can film but you can't. Where they do have security cameras thoses recordings are not public they are not publicly accessible and uploaded to social media sites, but a person can request the footage. When a person requests the footage they look at the reason the person wants the footage, if there is good cause and it is decided to release the footage, it is the job of the Custodian of records to review the footage and ensure it contains no private information, if it does it can be edited to remove names addresses and blur out faces to protect people's identities. This is not the case of third parties they do not have a responsibility to protect the libraries patrons, if a employee releases footage that contains private information, that employee can be fired for disobeying their policies. Where they can not fire a person who doesn't work there for breaking a policy they can trespass the person from the property to ensure the privacy of their users remain safe from unnecessary exposure. Where you have no expectation of privacy in most public spaces nonpublic forums recognize there are some spaces where a person can expect a limited amount of privacy in public and the need to protect that right to privacy. Libraries are not only places to check out books they are places where people do research and develop new ideas and theories or work on inventions. Because people bring a lot of intellectual property into Libraries and Universities the government employees are obligated to try and protect peoples intellectual property from unnecessary exposure. If people are live streaming to a social media site and purposefully or accidentally film personal intellectual property there is a risk of that information being stolen or being plagiarized by others. Libraries also have policies that the American Library Association (ALA) have put in place and a libraries Bill of Rights, this the the ALA'S position on privacy. "Privacy is essential to free inquiry in the library because it enables library users to select, access, and consider information and ideas without fear of embarrassment, judgment, punishment, or ostracism. A lack of privacy in what one reads and views in the library can have a significant chilling effect upon library users’ willingness to exercise their First Amendment right to read, thereby impairing free access to ideas. True liberty of choice in the library requires both a varied selection of materials and the assurance that one's choices are not monitored. The possibility of surveillance, whether direct or through access to records of speech, research and exploration, undermines a democratic society. One cannot exercise the right to read if the possible consequences include damage to one's reputation, ostracism from the community or workplace, or criminal penalties. Choice requires both a varied selection and the assurance that one's choice is not monitored. For libraries to flourish as centers for uninhibited access to information, librarians must stand behind their users' right to privacy and freedom of inquiry." I encourage people to look up all the information I've provided before you comment it is important to know your rights, and it is just as important to know when and where your rights can be limited.

[@808drummerpercussionist9]

They come in FORCE, to use Excessive FORCE, for NO CRIME

[@nyisls]

I would have opened the book to the page and handed it to the staff. If they wanted to read the policy to you, you should have read the constitution to them. The fact she wouldn't talk to you is a huge issue.

[@andythomas9564]

They just immediately call police without even speaking to LiA 🤦‍♂️

[@hearthrob300]

I think it's because Too Apree was there earlier.

[@andythomas9564]

@@hearthrob300 😂 o ok we’ll still dumb to call police, I didn’t realize that though thanks

[@nzvisordown]

That sergeant is ridiculous!!

[@viclunaanthc3274]

The library director using the police as her own Gestapo. She should be ashamed of herself. Time to reread some books lady! Stay strong brother. 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🇺🇸

[@omCi]

She should be charged for harassment. Having to talk to five police officers for this extended time over nothing is a literal harassment. Most people would’ve been afraid for their lives and their heart rate and blood pressure would probably be dangerous levels because of this interaction. As far as I’m concerned, she should spend a couple nights in jail for harassment.

[@ByeByeBS]

It's a fine line between being a director and a dictator.

[@joy4118]

Libraries are increasingly becoming disfunctional and irrelevant and should probably be defunded - along with much of the police force. Most Americans can no longer afford homes and cars but pay a lot of taxes for this nonsense.

[@JT0007]

Too Apree interacted with these same cops at this same library. Crazy to see you guys both do the same place same people. 🤙🫡🇺🇸🇮🇱

[@ByeByeBS]

@@omCi Unfortunately, the police don't see it this way. They love answering calls like this. Standing around wasting time is so much less risky than chasing and apprehending actual criminals.

[@ericlakemaker9910]

How is that second sergeant actually a LEO supervisor? Absolutely terrifying that these tyrants exist in positions of “power”. No different from WWII Germany

[@lizerdkeng1107]

Sargent says he doesn't want to talk about hypotheticals but that's exactly what he talked about the entire time

[@bigbassmanphd]

The more he speaks, the dumber he sounds. He is garbage

[@kiddhudi]

I just told my brother the exact same thing. What a tyrant ...Atrocious behavior. He should be ashamed of himself.

[@Karen-d6v9n]

@lizerdkeng Yes it is! People like him often project their own inadequacies and iniquities on others.

[@georgedunkelberg5004]

@@kiddhudi The "sargent" says: Hypotheticals! as if his rank chevrons+ aren't hypothetical-MILITARY??? for his use of dominations of WE THE PEOPLE"? Comedian RON WHITE said: "YOU CAN'T FIX STUPID!" as this audit has recorded.

[@jackiedavenport1028]

That's exactly why that Sargent went into Law Enforcement, his INADEQUACIES!!

[@jacksprat418-ju5qo]

The badged stupidity never ends..

[@jfox3508]

That police dept definitely has too many cops on duty if they can all show up and hang out for half an hour

[@BenFrank-wt2lm]

6 police officers controlling a "dangerous" man with a phone camera in a public library? Ridiculous!

[@johnbarragan921]

The police officer that came in at the end is a total Tyrant!! He would go hands!!!

[@user-zc9zt2vl5s]

Sgt Wilson is such an embarassment. Every word that comes out of his mouth is utter nonsense. How did he ever become a police officer? People like this should get a different job. He's not fit or smart enough to be a cop. Thanks for exposing these hypocritical idiots that have no common sense or logic. They're a bunch of brainwash fools. A reflection of the government. Pathetic.

[@jaylamb477]

The Sgt who was, ‘late to the party’ was a real smart ass, I’m glad you tried to straighten him out.

[@kbc1883]

Yes, his immaturity and lack of professionalism was pretty telling... he certainly showed his true colors and they are not flattering!

[@Robertoknows2111]

He was late for the party that taught his dept. officers about citizens rights.

[@edgegymnastics8409]

That library director has been in charge and control of that facility for far too long. She thinks she’s the queen of that library. She’s forgotten who she’s serving and what country she’s in

[@Scottie404]

You nailed it. She doesn't think she's accountable to anyone - and can choose NOT to speak to patrons of the library is she chooses not to.

[@WorldwideDarts]

THIS right here! She's become far too comfortable with her job and has totally forgot it's intended purpose of serving the public.

[@javier0304]

If she was that concern she should have walked Sean around instead of the officer. She took liberal studies instead of focusing on the constitution.

[@WorldwideDarts]

Huh? She's there to serve the public. If she chooses to not speak to them then she's clearly not doing her job. @@Scottie404

[@cainthenothing]

When he walked up with the book, that was hilarious

[@PapawPanda]

That Sergeant is a complete unprofessional tyranical tool! Made that himself, his fellow officers, his department and municipality look terrible and ridiculous!

[@rodneyhickman598]

Sargent Wilson is a prime example of what has happened to law enforcement over the years and what type of people should never be allowed in it.

[@paulengels6926]

It has always been corrupt with a bunch of tyrannical, sociopathic thugs who have no regard for those them serve. We just now have video proof which is the great equalizer. That is why these thugs hate cameras. They hate being accountable. Had not been for camera Sean would have been thrown in jail. Sociopaths hate when they can't bully.

[@shaystern2453]

oh it's always been like that, just getting exposure now

[@jamesamelia2812]

Be careful, pal. An ex-Marine murdered Chris Kyle!

[@Theuglytruth1776]

@@shaystern2453 absolutely! FTP!!!🤬 🤷 for the🥾👅👅👅 and the ignorant, FTP= fuk today’s policing! 😎✌️🇺🇸💪💪💪

[@FD-qd7zy]

Complete disdain for the public.

[@ScottFeribee]

What keeps them there is their narcissistic ego’s, they can never be wrong and they view anyone exercising their rights as an enemy.

[@jerrybaker-g7t]

The were worried about minors huh? kzbin.info/www/bejne/i6qagJ1qm7itq6s&pp=ygUpdHJhbnMgc3RvcnkgaG91ciBpbiBsaWJyYXJ5IGluIG5ldyBqZXJzZXk%3D

[@whatoh3407]

I have family in law enforcement, they really are narcissistic. They can't ever admit ANY wrong doing. Its always someone else's fault. All his kids left him after the divorce and all he can do is blame his ex wife for why the kids don't want to see him. He was literally spying on every little thing his kids did. He would interrogate them any time he was suspicious and he was always suspicious. He still is paranoid. Always trying to pit the siblings against eachother. They really are evil people.

[@joshuastanton6731]

@@whatoh3407 That’s sounds like a dangerous man that has no business in law enforcement.

[@jhard94]

Go watch “Too Apree” do his audit on this same Library lmao it’s hilarious. He just dropped the video as well.

[@calj01]

They are just kissing the library director's ass

[@WDCFL]

Omg! Hands him a book from the library that says the Constitution explained!. You are the best!. You are the big kahuna and I bow to you sir!. Excellent!.

[@Claudette451]

The bottom line is policy is not law.Simple. It’s so ridiculous for law enforcement to just be standing around for no crime.The condescending Sargeant Wilson was so annoying!

[@allemander]

Wilson is a disgrace!

[@nathanielfishburnesr.5332]

Breaking a policy is not breaking the law. 💪💪

[@GoToPhx]

Very glad I'm not the only one who couldn't stand him!

[@Laphius]

If cops are so concerned about minors in the library, then they shouldn’t gang up and bring guns into the library.

[@frankbarrile1458]

Do you really follow this clown, sad if you do!

[@HONORYOUROATH]

If it were up to cops and the general public we wouldn’t be able to exercise our rights any time “the ladies” or “the children” are within a 5 mile radius. Or if “the ladies” or “the children” will be within a 5 mile radius in the next 5 hours.

[@princesspiplaysbass]

What is a woman anyway? Sean could be identifying as a woman today.

[@mr.duanesharpe]

That’s just all fallacy and escalation by mentioning kids and females in danger. Cop is a tool

[@ChristiaanC458]

Dummy’s 🇺🇸🤡🤯🍩🐒

[@douglasscovil3447]

showing a cop a copy of the Constitution is like showing a cross to a vampire, they hate it.

[@PeteD-qh8gp]

I love FREEDOM

[@PeteDa-vt1ut]

Funnnyyyyy

[@AK34_39]

😂

[@helenahawk7752]

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@adrianwysocki1086]

OHHH MY GOSH best commenttttt eveeerrrr "showing a cop a copy of the Constitution is like showing a cross to a vampire"❤❤❤❤ Love iTTTT🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@jamesbarber6056]

What a dreadful waste of police resources. That policy was unnecessary & simply about control but, even if there was a sense in it for those officers not to have immediately informed the library director of the First Amendment content was wrong. Love this channel.

[@SupremeScientist]

"I have my own policy.. and it says I follow the United States Constitution." 💯💯💯

[@sapshootervt]

Natural (so called law). Do no harm.

[@urgreatestenemy]

In Kreimer v. Board of Police of Morristown, NJ, an important court opinion addressing a library user’s right to enter and use the library, the court held that because public libraries are a limited public forum, constitutional protection is afforded only to those expressive activities that are consistent with the mission and purpose of the library. A public library is only obligated to permit the public to exercise rights that are consistent with the government’s intent in establishing the library as a limited public forum for the purpose of receiving information and accessing the library’s books, programs, and online resources. According to the Kreimer opinion, other activities, including activities such as photography, filming, petition-gathering, assemblies, and public speeches, may be regulated by the library using reasonable, viewpoint neutral, time, place, and manner rules. Brown v. Louisiana, 383 U.S. 131, 142, 86 S. Ct. 719, 724, 15 L. Ed. 2d 637 (1966). A library is "a place dedicated to quiet, to knowledge, and to beauty." Its very purpose is to aid in the acquisition of knowledge through reading, writing and quiet contemplation. Thus, the exercise of other oral and interactive First Amendment activities is antithetical to the nature of the Library. These arguably conflicting characteristics, at least in a First Amendment sense, support our conclusion that the Library constitutes a limited public forum, a sub-category of designated public fora.21 See Brody v. Spang, at 1118. We thus adopt the reasoning of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Travis v. Owego-Apalachin School District, 927 F.2d 688 (2d Cir. 1991), where the court held that a limited public forum "is created when government opens a nonpublic forum but limits the expressive activity to certain kinds of speakers or to the discussion of certain subjects.... In the case of a limited public forum, constitutional protection is afforded only to expressive activity of a genre similar to those that government has admitted to the limited forum." Id. at 692 (emphasis supplied).22 Hence, as a limited public forum, the Library is obligated only to permit the public to exercise rights that are consistent with the nature of the Library and consistent with the government's intent in designating the Library as a public forum.23 Other activities need not be tolerated. Adderley v. Florida the Supreme court ruled in that case that the state can own property and they have a right to restrict access to the property at anytime. Understand policies are not laws, but you can be trespassed from any building for not following their policies. For example, the policy of no shoes, no shirt, no service, has been around for years. Where it is not a law you must wear shoes if you break the policy they can deny you service. Once you are denied service you can not use the building in its intended purposes so you can be trespassed. It doesn't matter if the place is public what matters is what type of fourm the government has designated to the place. The Supreme Court established three different types of public forums in Perry Education Association v. Perry Local Educators' Association (1983): traditional, limited and nonpublic. Limited and nonpublic fourms can limit the use of the public space to its designed purpose, and can even reasonably restrict or limit a person's first amendment rights. Courts have ruled that filming is subject to Time, Place, and Manner if the place is a nonpublic forum filming can be restricted. A missconception is being passed around the internet that you can not be trespassed from public property unless you violate a law, this is not the case anyone can be trespassed from a space for not following the rules or policies posted within the space. Each state has their own trespassing laws you should read the law in your state to better understand the law many states leave the law vague on when a person is guilty of criminal trespassing. Where you do have a right to film, it is not absolute the government reserves the option to limit a person's rights in certain spaces they designate as nonpublic forums. Typically nonpublic forums are established inside Courthouses, Libraries, Schools, and Universities but can be expanded to include other public spaces. Glik v. Cunniffe, 655 F.3d 78 (1st Cir. 2011) is a case in which the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit held that a private citizen has the right to record video and audio of police carrying out their duties in a public place, and that the arrest of the citizen for a wiretapping violation violated his First and Fourth Amendment rights and held that a citizen has the right to film public officials in a public place; the public's right of access to information is coextensive with that of the press. This case upholds that every citizen has equal rights to film in public places as the press. However, the court also noted that the right to film public officials was subject to reasonable limitations with respect to the time, place and manner in which the recording was conducted. This means everyone has equal rights to film the press are granted no extra privileges wherever a citizen is restricted in filming the press are bound to obey the same limitations. Now lets get into filming the courts have ruled filming is a person's right, but that right can be limited by Time Place and Manner restrictions. Where you have the right to film in most public spaces anywhere a person can reasonably expect privacy filming can be restricted. For example, a restroom is a public space open to the general public, but filming inside a restroom is illegal. Now lets get into why they can film but you can't. Where they do have security cameras thoses recordings are not public they are not publicly accessible and uploaded to social media sites, but a person can request the footage. When a person requests the footage they look at the reason the person wants the footage, if there is good cause and it is decided to release the footage, it is the job of the Custodian of records to review the footage and ensure it contains no private information, if it does it can be edited to remove names addresses and blur out faces to protect people's identities. This is not the case of third parties they do not have a responsibility to protect the libraries patrons, if a employee releases footage that contains private information, that employee can be fired for disobeying their policies. Where they can not fire a person who doesn't work there for breaking a policy they can trespass the person from the property to ensure the privacy of their users remain safe from unnecessary exposure. Where you have no expectation of privacy in most public spaces nonpublic forums recognize there are some spaces where a person can expect a limited amount of privacy in public and the need to protect that right to privacy. Libraries are not only places to check out books they are places where people do research and develop new ideas and theories or work on inventions. Because people bring a lot of intellectual property into Libraries and Universities the government employees are obligated to try and protect peoples intellectual property from unnecessary exposure. If people are live streaming to a social media site and purposefully or accidentally film personal intellectual property there is a risk of that information being stolen or being plagiarized by others. Libraries also have policies that the American Library Association (ALA) have put in place and a libraries Bill of Rights, this the the ALA'S position on privacy. "Privacy is essential to free inquiry in the library because it enables library users to select, access, and consider information and ideas without fear of embarrassment, judgment, punishment, or ostracism. A lack of privacy in what one reads and views in the library can have a significant chilling effect upon library users’ willingness to exercise their First Amendment right to read, thereby impairing free access to ideas. True liberty of choice in the library requires both a varied selection of materials and the assurance that one's choices are not monitored. The possibility of surveillance, whether direct or through access to records of speech, research and exploration, undermines a democratic society. One cannot exercise the right to read if the possible consequences include damage to one's reputation, ostracism from the community or workplace, or criminal penalties. Choice requires both a varied selection and the assurance that one's choice is not monitored. For libraries to flourish as centers for uninhibited access to information, librarians must stand behind their users' right to privacy and freedom of inquiry." I encourage people to look up all the information I've provided before you comment it is important to know your rights, and it is just as important to know when and where your rights can be limited.

[@garyeggbean2803]

The Sergeant started talking about children for no reason when there were no children around. He admitted he films children and that there might be some children coming to the library later. The Sergeant is creepy.

[@Yerocco]

He also didn’t like Sean’s hypotheticals which is super contradicting.

[@Sarge395]

Children, puppies, citizen safety...that SGT was a PIG

[@donsab-xz4so]

Then a minute later he derides Sean for talking about "speculation."

[@1960Wheelz]

I was waiting the Sgt to spew out the old chestnut - "Oh, NO! Think of the children!!" And put the back of his hand to his forehead while pretending to swoon!

[@mikeburgh3956]

"The wife beater"

[@carnaud]

“The constitution explained”. Pure gold!

[@redrooster1727]

ISNT IT ABOUT TIME THAT PEOPLE THAT MAKE A CALL LIKE THIS ARE HELD TO ACCOUNT.

[@jsalinas118]

That Sargent is the reason, people are disillusioned with the police.

[@Frank-u1y6g]

That library staff or director whoever she is so rude and unprofessional she should be fired...she even didn't answer...😮

[@allemander]

She’s a cowardly, fire-starting dictator wannabe.

[@bloodybones63]

Yeah, she was butt hurt big time, like a child when she couldn't get her way. Wannnnnnnn

[@bradpotter6401]

She was butt hurt because she couldn't use her perceived authority to kick Sean out of "her" library.

[@STEVEID1946]

The library director is a Karen that wants to complain in secret. She does not want to look as ignorant as she really is.

[@ByeByeBS]

Never confuse ignorance with autocracy. It's a fine line between being a director and a dictator.

[@bigbassmanphd]

And Wilson has serious brain damage.

[@belair54]

A person can remain intelligent until they open their mouth then all doubt goes away!

[@urgreatestenemy]

In Kreimer v. Board of Police of Morristown, NJ, an important court opinion addressing a library user’s right to enter and use the library, the court held that because public libraries are a limited public forum, constitutional protection is afforded only to those expressive activities that are consistent with the mission and purpose of the library. A public library is only obligated to permit the public to exercise rights that are consistent with the government’s intent in establishing the library as a limited public forum for the purpose of receiving information and accessing the library’s books, programs, and online resources. According to the Kreimer opinion, other activities, including activities such as photography, filming, petition-gathering, assemblies, and public speeches, may be regulated by the library using reasonable, viewpoint neutral, time, place, and manner rules. Brown v. Louisiana, 383 U.S. 131, 142, 86 S. Ct. 719, 724, 15 L. Ed. 2d 637 (1966). A library is "a place dedicated to quiet, to knowledge, and to beauty." Its very purpose is to aid in the acquisition of knowledge through reading, writing and quiet contemplation. Thus, the exercise of other oral and interactive First Amendment activities is antithetical to the nature of the Library. These arguably conflicting characteristics, at least in a First Amendment sense, support our conclusion that the Library constitutes a limited public forum, a sub-category of designated public fora.21 See Brody v. Spang, at 1118. We thus adopt the reasoning of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Travis v. Owego-Apalachin School District, 927 F.2d 688 (2d Cir. 1991), where the court held that a limited public forum "is created when government opens a nonpublic forum but limits the expressive activity to certain kinds of speakers or to the discussion of certain subjects.... In the case of a limited public forum, constitutional protection is afforded only to expressive activity of a genre similar to those that government has admitted to the limited forum." Id. at 692 (emphasis supplied).22 Hence, as a limited public forum, the Library is obligated only to permit the public to exercise rights that are consistent with the nature of the Library and consistent with the government's intent in designating the Library as a public forum.23 Other activities need not be tolerated. Adderley v. Florida the Supreme court ruled in that case that the state can own property and they have a right to restrict access to the property at anytime. Understand policies are not laws, but you can be trespassed from any building for not following their policies. For example, the policy of no shoes, no shirt, no service, has been around for years. Where it is not a law you must wear shoes if you break the policy they can deny you service. Once you are denied service you can not use the building in its intended purposes so you can be trespassed. It doesn't matter if the place is public what matters is what type of fourm the government has designated to the place. The Supreme Court established three different types of public forums in Perry Education Association v. Perry Local Educators' Association (1983): traditional, limited and nonpublic. Limited and nonpublic fourms can limit the use of the public space to its designed purpose, and can even reasonably restrict or limit a person's first amendment rights. Courts have ruled that filming is subject to Time, Place, and Manner if the place is a nonpublic forum filming can be restricted. A missconception is being passed around the internet that you can not be trespassed from public property unless you violate a law, this is not the case anyone can be trespassed from a space for not following the rules or policies posted within the space. Each state has their own trespassing laws you should read the law in your state to better understand the law many states leave the law vague on when a person is guilty of criminal trespassing. Where you do have a right to film, it is not absolute the government reserves the option to limit a person's rights in certain spaces they designate as nonpublic forums. Typically nonpublic forums are established inside Courthouses, Libraries, Schools, and Universities but can be expanded to include other public spaces. Glik v. Cunniffe, 655 F.3d 78 (1st Cir. 2011) is a case in which the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit held that a private citizen has the right to record video and audio of police carrying out their duties in a public place, and that the arrest of the citizen for a wiretapping violation violated his First and Fourth Amendment rights and held that a citizen has the right to film public officials in a public place; the public's right of access to information is coextensive with that of the press. This case upholds that every citizen has equal rights to film in public places as the press. However, the court also noted that the right to film public officials was subject to reasonable limitations with respect to the time, place and manner in which the recording was conducted. This means everyone has equal rights to film the press are granted no extra privileges wherever a citizen is restricted in filming the press are bound to obey the same limitations. Now lets get into filming the courts have ruled filming is a person's right, but that right can be limited by Time Place and Manner restrictions. Where you have the right to film in most public spaces anywhere a person can reasonably expect privacy filming can be restricted. For example, a restroom is a public space open to the general public, but filming inside a restroom is illegal. Now lets get into why they can film but you can't. Where they do have security cameras thoses recordings are not public they are not publicly accessible and uploaded to social media sites, but a person can request the footage. When a person requests the footage they look at the reason the person wants the footage, if there is good cause and it is decided to release the footage, it is the job of the Custodian of records to review the footage and ensure it contains no private information, if it does it can be edited to remove names addresses and blur out faces to protect people's identities. This is not the case of third parties they do not have a responsibility to protect the libraries patrons, if a employee releases footage that contains private information, that employee can be fired for disobeying their policies. Where they can not fire a person who doesn't work there for breaking a policy they can trespass the person from the property to ensure the privacy of their users remain safe from unnecessary exposure. Where you have no expectation of privacy in most public spaces nonpublic forums recognize there are some spaces where a person can expect a limited amount of privacy in public and the need to protect that right to privacy. Libraries are not only places to check out books they are places where people do research and develop new ideas and theories or work on inventions. Because people bring a lot of intellectual property into Libraries and Universities the government employees are obligated to try and protect peoples intellectual property from unnecessary exposure. If people are live streaming to a social media site and purposefully or accidentally film personal intellectual property there is a risk of that information being stolen or being plagiarized by others. Libraries also have policies that the American Library Association (ALA) have put in place and a libraries Bill of Rights, this the the ALA'S position on privacy. "Privacy is essential to free inquiry in the library because it enables library users to select, access, and consider information and ideas without fear of embarrassment, judgment, punishment, or ostracism. A lack of privacy in what one reads and views in the library can have a significant chilling effect upon library users’ willingness to exercise their First Amendment right to read, thereby impairing free access to ideas. True liberty of choice in the library requires both a varied selection of materials and the assurance that one's choices are not monitored. The possibility of surveillance, whether direct or through access to records of speech, research and exploration, undermines a democratic society. One cannot exercise the right to read if the possible consequences include damage to one's reputation, ostracism from the community or workplace, or criminal penalties. Choice requires both a varied selection and the assurance that one's choice is not monitored. For libraries to flourish as centers for uninhibited access to information, librarians must stand behind their users' right to privacy and freedom of inquiry." I encourage people to look up all the information I've provided before you comment it is important to know your rights, and it is just as important to know when and where your rights can be limited.

[@vivianewing7154]

I agree, not only is she ignorant of the constitutions 1st amendment but she is ignorant of customer service etiquette also.

[@charlesporter641]

"The Constitution Explained" 🔥🔥🔥

[@jaycarrillojc]

The gaslighting is strong with this one

[@Lonesome.Cowboy]

A constitutionally protected activity cannot be turned into a crime.

[@russellreal4718]

But they do it with the second admendment all the time...we have no rights with theese nazi blue shirts running around

[@randalshipley4078]

They need to get a different job and the director needs to be FIRED immediately

[@mane8407]

How did that Sargent ever get promoted? The disdain he has for people is astounding. What an embarrassment to the profession of all law enforcement. Policy ( poli-ce)

[@HardCold-Alquan]

Small towns use the buddy system, and they hardly get fired - especially when many are corrupted already.

[@fredhammer6413]

He got promoted by doing well on a civil service test.

[@Wheresyourman]

He's exactly the type of psychopath they're looking for.

[@gregorychurches5468]

That's what qualified him for his chevrons. Crap corrupt cops are the fall guys for those above who hide behind their mayors bidding.

[@javier0304]

The Sargent is probably related to the library director.

[@maguilla]

This place needs a second visit. ( the disregard against the US constitution needs to end)

[@wadestanton]

I wonder: there were no people taking shelter from the cold, at the Library. There might be something more sinister going on than US Constitutional violations.

[@bluntguy9532]

Too Apree has a video from this place posted.

[@bdwilcox]

@@wadestanton One of the wealthiest towns in one of the wealthiest states.

[@wadestanton]

@@bdwilcox I guess they can afford using the police to chase away cold people.

[@pointmanzero]

​@@bluntguy9532 And the librarian learned nothing

[@oisajdfposid]

That town has far too much law enforcement budget if they can send so many officers for no crime

[@mstover2809]

@COTTFLIX DEFEND? Don't you mean DEFUND as they seem to have TOO MANY?

[@mstover2809]

@COTTFLIX Well, it happens to most of us at some time or another! I have had it happen NUMEROUS times.

[@enigmatic1986]

Great work! Love the video, and it’s a smart move to email the director about the constitutional rights issue. If possible, please share the email you plan to send so we have a record in case this library faces a lawsuit.

[@scrappy8ball]

That last cop that showed up is the exact kind of cop that needs to lose his job. His attitude and general disdain for citizens is clearly wrong for that job.

[@whale-psychiatrist]

smol pp syndrome

[@dennish3962]

His disdain for the people who own everything he has is WHY he is a sergeant! Good kind and helpful cops don't make their way up the ranks. They leave after seeing the corruption. Bad cops rise to the top, because that's what the powers that be want.

[@sting1111]

@@dennish3962 i have met a few cops like that jerkoff..

[@Eagle8]

He will cause taxpayers money.

[@truthandreality4650]

No wonder the library is empty. No one wants to be abused by the staff. It also serves as a means of keeping good, empathic, normal, loving people from acquiring knowledge and being empowered.

[@chrisbudesa]

Time of day matters.

[@ByeByeBS]

"So why does a library exist?" Excellent question! Libraries are no longer repositories of information open to the public. They are now primarily becoming community social and day-care centers, funded by taxpayer $$$. In other words, the primary purpose of public libraries has been purposely rendered obsolete and replaced by an imposed extension of the public school system.

[@ByeByeBS]

The staff wasn't actually abusive. The library director is the dictator of a nanny state organization. It is an extension of the public school system. They now treat everyone there as though we are all children. Therefore, man with a camera is seen an a threat and an intruder.

[@truthandreality4650]

@@ByeByeBS And places where men dressed as women can confuse children of their gender identity while reading fairy tales.

[@urgreatestenemy]

In Kreimer v. Board of Police of Morristown, NJ, an important court opinion addressing a library user’s right to enter and use the library, the court held that because public libraries are a limited public forum, constitutional protection is afforded only to those expressive activities that are consistent with the mission and purpose of the library. A public library is only obligated to permit the public to exercise rights that are consistent with the government’s intent in establishing the library as a limited public forum for the purpose of receiving information and accessing the library’s books, programs, and online resources. According to the Kreimer opinion, other activities, including activities such as photography, filming, petition-gathering, assemblies, and public speeches, may be regulated by the library using reasonable, viewpoint neutral, time, place, and manner rules. Brown v. Louisiana, 383 U.S. 131, 142, 86 S. Ct. 719, 724, 15 L. Ed. 2d 637 (1966). A library is "a place dedicated to quiet, to knowledge, and to beauty." Its very purpose is to aid in the acquisition of knowledge through reading, writing and quiet contemplation. Thus, the exercise of other oral and interactive First Amendment activities is antithetical to the nature of the Library. These arguably conflicting characteristics, at least in a First Amendment sense, support our conclusion that the Library constitutes a limited public forum, a sub-category of designated public fora.21 See Brody v. Spang, at 1118. We thus adopt the reasoning of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Travis v. Owego-Apalachin School District, 927 F.2d 688 (2d Cir. 1991), where the court held that a limited public forum "is created when government opens a nonpublic forum but limits the expressive activity to certain kinds of speakers or to the discussion of certain subjects.... In the case of a limited public forum, constitutional protection is afforded only to expressive activity of a genre similar to those that government has admitted to the limited forum." Id. at 692 (emphasis supplied).22 Hence, as a limited public forum, the Library is obligated only to permit the public to exercise rights that are consistent with the nature of the Library and consistent with the government's intent in designating the Library as a public forum.23 Other activities need not be tolerated. Adderley v. Florida the Supreme court ruled in that case that the state can own property and they have a right to restrict access to the property at anytime. Understand policies are not laws, but you can be trespassed from any building for not following their policies. For example, the policy of no shoes, no shirt, no service, has been around for years. Where it is not a law you must wear shoes if you break the policy they can deny you service. Once you are denied service you can not use the building in its intended purposes so you can be trespassed. It doesn't matter if the place is public what matters is what type of fourm the government has designated to the place. The Supreme Court established three different types of public forums in Perry Education Association v. Perry Local Educators' Association (1983): traditional, limited and nonpublic. Limited and nonpublic fourms can limit the use of the public space to its designed purpose, and can even reasonably restrict or limit a person's first amendment rights. Courts have ruled that filming is subject to Time, Place, and Manner if the place is a nonpublic forum filming can be restricted. A missconception is being passed around the internet that you can not be trespassed from public property unless you violate a law, this is not the case anyone can be trespassed from a space for not following the rules or policies posted within the space. Each state has their own trespassing laws you should read the law in your state to better understand the law many states leave the law vague on when a person is guilty of criminal trespassing. Where you do have a right to film, it is not absolute the government reserves the option to limit a person's rights in certain spaces they designate as nonpublic forums. Typically nonpublic forums are established inside Courthouses, Libraries, Schools, and Universities but can be expanded to include other public spaces. Glik v. Cunniffe, 655 F.3d 78 (1st Cir. 2011) is a case in which the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit held that a private citizen has the right to record video and audio of police carrying out their duties in a public place, and that the arrest of the citizen for a wiretapping violation violated his First and Fourth Amendment rights and held that a citizen has the right to film public officials in a public place; the public's right of access to information is coextensive with that of the press. This case upholds that every citizen has equal rights to film in public places as the press. However, the court also noted that the right to film public officials was subject to reasonable limitations with respect to the time, place and manner in which the recording was conducted. This means everyone has equal rights to film the press are granted no extra privileges wherever a citizen is restricted in filming the press are bound to obey the same limitations. Now lets get into filming the courts have ruled filming is a person's right, but that right can be limited by Time Place and Manner restrictions. Where you have the right to film in most public spaces anywhere a person can reasonably expect privacy filming can be restricted. For example, a restroom is a public space open to the general public, but filming inside a restroom is illegal. Now lets get into why they can film but you can't. Where they do have security cameras thoses recordings are not public they are not publicly accessible and uploaded to social media sites, but a person can request the footage. When a person requests the footage they look at the reason the person wants the footage, if there is good cause and it is decided to release the footage, it is the job of the Custodian of records to review the footage and ensure it contains no private information, if it does it can be edited to remove names addresses and blur out faces to protect people's identities. This is not the case of third parties they do not have a responsibility to protect the libraries patrons, if a employee releases footage that contains private information, that employee can be fired for disobeying their policies. Where they can not fire a person who doesn't work there for breaking a policy they can trespass the person from the property to ensure the privacy of their users remain safe from unnecessary exposure. Where you have no expectation of privacy in most public spaces nonpublic forums recognize there are some spaces where a person can expect a limited amount of privacy in public and the need to protect that right to privacy. Libraries are not only places to check out books they are places where people do research and develop new ideas and theories or work on inventions. Because people bring a lot of intellectual property into Libraries and Universities the government employees are obligated to try and protect peoples intellectual property from unnecessary exposure. If people are live streaming to a social media site and purposefully or accidentally film personal intellectual property there is a risk of that information being stolen or being plagiarized by others. Libraries also have policies that the American Library Association (ALA) have put in place and a libraries Bill of Rights, this the the ALA'S position on privacy. "Privacy is essential to free inquiry in the library because it enables library users to select, access, and consider information and ideas without fear of embarrassment, judgment, punishment, or ostracism. A lack of privacy in what one reads and views in the library can have a significant chilling effect upon library users’ willingness to exercise their First Amendment right to read, thereby impairing free access to ideas. True liberty of choice in the library requires both a varied selection of materials and the assurance that one's choices are not monitored. The possibility of surveillance, whether direct or through access to records of speech, research and exploration, undermines a democratic society. One cannot exercise the right to read if the possible consequences include damage to one's reputation, ostracism from the community or workplace, or criminal penalties. Choice requires both a varied selection and the assurance that one's choice is not monitored. For libraries to flourish as centers for uninhibited access to information, librarians must stand behind their users' right to privacy and freedom of inquiry." I encourage people to look up all the information I've provided before you comment it is important to know your rights, and it is just as important to know when and where your rights can be limited.

[@bevonostro................]

What a valuable lesson this library staff has provided about the dangers of totalitarian government...

[@urgreatestenemy]

In Kreimer v. Board of Police of Morristown, NJ, an important court opinion addressing a library user’s right to enter and use the library, the court held that because public libraries are a limited public forum, constitutional protection is afforded only to those expressive activities that are consistent with the mission and purpose of the library. A public library is only obligated to permit the public to exercise rights that are consistent with the government’s intent in establishing the library as a limited public forum for the purpose of receiving information and accessing the library’s books, programs, and online resources. According to the Kreimer opinion, other activities, including activities such as photography, filming, petition-gathering, assemblies, and public speeches, may be regulated by the library using reasonable, viewpoint neutral, time, place, and manner rules. Brown v. Louisiana, 383 U.S. 131, 142, 86 S. Ct. 719, 724, 15 L. Ed. 2d 637 (1966). A library is "a place dedicated to quiet, to knowledge, and to beauty." Its very purpose is to aid in the acquisition of knowledge through reading, writing and quiet contemplation. Thus, the exercise of other oral and interactive First Amendment activities is antithetical to the nature of the Library. These arguably conflicting characteristics, at least in a First Amendment sense, support our conclusion that the Library constitutes a limited public forum, a sub-category of designated public fora.21 See Brody v. Spang, at 1118. We thus adopt the reasoning of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Travis v. Owego-Apalachin School District, 927 F.2d 688 (2d Cir. 1991), where the court held that a limited public forum "is created when government opens a nonpublic forum but limits the expressive activity to certain kinds of speakers or to the discussion of certain subjects.... In the case of a limited public forum, constitutional protection is afforded only to expressive activity of a genre similar to those that government has admitted to the limited forum." Id. at 692 (emphasis supplied).22 Hence, as a limited public forum, the Library is obligated only to permit the public to exercise rights that are consistent with the nature of the Library and consistent with the government's intent in designating the Library as a public forum.23 Other activities need not be tolerated. Adderley v. Florida the Supreme court ruled in that case that the state can own property and they have a right to restrict access to the property at anytime. Understand policies are not laws, but you can be trespassed from any building for not following their policies. For example, the policy of no shoes, no shirt, no service, has been around for years. Where it is not a law you must wear shoes if you break the policy they can deny you service. Once you are denied service you can not use the building in its intended purposes so you can be trespassed. It doesn't matter if the place is public what matters is what type of fourm the government has designated to the place. The Supreme Court established three different types of public forums in Perry Education Association v. Perry Local Educators' Association (1983): traditional, limited and nonpublic. Limited and nonpublic fourms can limit the use of the public space to its designed purpose, and can even reasonably restrict or limit a person's first amendment rights. Courts have ruled that filming is subject to Time, Place, and Manner if the place is a nonpublic forum filming can be restricted. A missconception is being passed around the internet that you can not be trespassed from public property unless you violate a law, this is not the case anyone can be trespassed from a space for not following the rules or policies posted within the space. Each state has their own trespassing laws you should read the law in your state to better understand the law many states leave the law vague on when a person is guilty of criminal trespassing. Where you do have a right to film, it is not absolute the government reserves the option to limit a person's rights in certain spaces they designate as nonpublic forums. Typically nonpublic forums are established inside Courthouses, Libraries, Schools, and Universities but can be expanded to include other public spaces. Glik v. Cunniffe, 655 F.3d 78 (1st Cir. 2011) is a case in which the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit held that a private citizen has the right to record video and audio of police carrying out their duties in a public place, and that the arrest of the citizen for a wiretapping violation violated his First and Fourth Amendment rights and held that a citizen has the right to film public officials in a public place; the public's right of access to information is coextensive with that of the press. This case upholds that every citizen has equal rights to film in public places as the press. However, the court also noted that the right to film public officials was subject to reasonable limitations with respect to the time, place and manner in which the recording was conducted. This means everyone has equal rights to film the press are granted no extra privileges wherever a citizen is restricted in filming the press are bound to obey the same limitations. Now lets get into filming the courts have ruled filming is a person's right, but that right can be limited by Time Place and Manner restrictions. Where you have the right to film in most public spaces anywhere a person can reasonably expect privacy filming can be restricted. For example, a restroom is a public space open to the general public, but filming inside a restroom is illegal. Now lets get into why they can film but you can't. Where they do have security cameras thoses recordings are not public they are not publicly accessible and uploaded to social media sites, but a person can request the footage. When a person requests the footage they look at the reason the person wants the footage, if there is good cause and it is decided to release the footage, it is the job of the Custodian of records to review the footage and ensure it contains no private information, if it does it can be edited to remove names addresses and blur out faces to protect people's identities. This is not the case of third parties they do not have a responsibility to protect the libraries patrons, if a employee releases footage that contains private information, that employee can be fired for disobeying their policies. Where they can not fire a person who doesn't work there for breaking a policy they can trespass the person from the property to ensure the privacy of their users remain safe from unnecessary exposure. Where you have no expectation of privacy in most public spaces nonpublic forums recognize there are some spaces where a person can expect a limited amount of privacy in public and the need to protect that right to privacy. Libraries are not only places to check out books they are places where people do research and develop new ideas and theories or work on inventions. Because people bring a lot of intellectual property into Libraries and Universities the government employees are obligated to try and protect peoples intellectual property from unnecessary exposure. If people are live streaming to a social media site and purposefully or accidentally film personal intellectual property there is a risk of that information being stolen or being plagiarized by others. Libraries also have policies that the American Library Association (ALA) have put in place and a libraries Bill of Rights, this the the ALA'S position on privacy. "Privacy is essential to free inquiry in the library because it enables library users to select, access, and consider information and ideas without fear of embarrassment, judgment, punishment, or ostracism. A lack of privacy in what one reads and views in the library can have a significant chilling effect upon library users’ willingness to exercise their First Amendment right to read, thereby impairing free access to ideas. True liberty of choice in the library requires both a varied selection of materials and the assurance that one's choices are not monitored. The possibility of surveillance, whether direct or through access to records of speech, research and exploration, undermines a democratic society. One cannot exercise the right to read if the possible consequences include damage to one's reputation, ostracism from the community or workplace, or criminal penalties. Choice requires both a varied selection and the assurance that one's choice is not monitored. For libraries to flourish as centers for uninhibited access to information, librarians must stand behind their users' right to privacy and freedom of inquiry." I encourage people to look up all the information I've provided before you comment it is important to know your rights, and it is just as important to know when and where your rights can be limited.

[@asstronomy9]

Handing him the book on the constitution was absolutely priceless!

[@Violet-xg4bb]

Kudos to the library employee that helped with pleasure. ❤

[@trnwrck3571]

Imagine getting a call that a guy is breaking no laws, show up and meet the guy who is reasonable, articulate and is in fact breaking no laws. And then disrespect the guy by saying he can't be alone in a place he's welcome because he "might" harass someone, on top of getting stressed that you "don't have time for this". They really don't hire emotionally efficient police officers.

[@davestevens4263]

They hire bottom of the barrel phycopaths.

[@eltorocal]

KKKops don't become Psychopaths... Psychopaths become KKKops. Imagine their Home and personal lives. ...and there is no "off switch".

[@jessejames9618]

Preach !!

[@bdwilcox]

He wouldn't know what prior restraint was if you tattooed it on his hand.

[@eltorocal]

@@bdwilcox Two black eyes after finding him out of costume would sure give him a hint.

[@marazion]

Sgt. Wilson and the library head/director are a poor refection on their community. I work in a public library system in a large city in another country, and we would never dream of calling the police on a patron who wasn't breaking the law. Not to mention without even so much as having a conversation with him first! Shame on her for her cowardice in not identifying herself and for her lack of patron centered service, and shame on him for being so rigid and full of himself. And shame on them both for being happy enough to benefit from the Constitution while clearly not feeling any particular need to do their part to uphold it.

[@BenFrank-wt2lm]

😀😄🤣😂Police officer: "What is it?" 👀looking at the book. Sean-Paul: "The Constitution explained"😂🤩

[@MrDenis7p]

The Library Lady at 20:40 should be Fired if she can't serve you a member of the Public any better than this.

[@incredibleadventures1027]

If i worked in a library i would read all day and be very informed

[@markbanks4738]

I know a librarian, and that’s what she does

[@johnmccormick3608]

A master class in how to stand up for your rights.

[@The-Weekend-Warrior]

Policy HAS TO GO. Voice your concerns We The People!

[@stevent5571]

The big cop said it best. We are wasting resources and need to do other things. LEAVE

[@ByeByeBS]

But they found Sean IRRESISTABLE.

[@Karen-d6v9n]

@@ByeByeBS Sean is irresistible!

[@larrygarnett850]

What a move. Offering the book explaining the constitution. So great

[@nigelcurtis3421]

Poor Sargeant ... This was a Too Apree double up 😀 Strictly Feeeshin with LIA, more than any occifer can handle .

[@matthew360]

Warming Peter!

[@TooApree]

JAJAJA

[@readywhen]

Hahaha I instantly recognized the chill asifer from the thumbnail

[@uhjyuff2095]

I love how SGT Wilson uses words like "you are being disingenuous" and then he also repeats "I just got here and have no idea what is going on" LOL.

[@stevedavies1226]

It’s not the day that’s slow, it’s the occifers that are slow. They all need retraining on the difference between law & policy, before being released back into public on really short leashes

[@johnross8614]

Send a 6 grade class into the library all recording. That sergeant would have a heart attack. All those kids being recorded BY EACH OTHER 😂😂😂

[@mortalman01]

Thank you for exposing this gangland activity. The 2nd sarg was clearly agitated and on the verge of tyrany. Sad look for those officers!

[@Clubs_88]

The children logic was gross and unecessary

[@Icarealot88]

He's projecting. Said the same thing to Too Apree. Creepy

[@barbaraavila6249]

Good thing there weren't any acorn trees in the area you might have been fired upon.

[@chrisking5055]

😂😂

[@Wernotfree]

😂😂😂😂😂

[@dustins91s10]

🤣🤣 I just watched that last video last night. Craziest thing I’ve ever seen.

[@EricBuxton-qy8yt]

WOW damn i couldn't believe that when i first saw it ! Just WOW

[@theycallmelee007]

Best part, "Constitution explained" .... yet they don't want to look at it! 😂😂

[@ceeweight3845]

COPSPLAINING TRIGGERS ME. Sean is a beast for maintaining control and keeping the "conversation" on point.

[@BillyBOB-sm3rl]

Me too and I can't stand it when cops say. "We are trying to figure out what is going on". To it means they are just stupid.

[@TontoEpstein]

Of course he does, that's part and parcel of his pathology.

[@bevonostro................]

To be fair, the absence of patrons in this authoritarian stronghold is quite noticeable.

[@Nutnboujee]

Right? And then the Sergeant was WAYYYY TOO LOUD for a library. He was displaying Disorderly conduct!

[@gangoffour6690]

You know they don't care. TOO APREE did a video in this same library.

[@DesiRush1]

It's pretty hard to run a brick and mortar library in the age of the internet, my local library has been unofficially converted into a public restroom for the homeless.

[@FreeUkraine69]

When they talk , Sean should tell them to shut it as his policy is for public servants to shut up unless he asks a question and gives them permission to speak !@@Nutnboujee

[@FreeUkraine69]

When they talk , Sean should tell them to shut it as his policy is for public servants to shut up unless he asks a question and gives them permission to speak !@@gangoffour6690

[@ICURYY4ME2]

Can I just take a moment to thank our forefathers and their brilliance in knowing how to protect the future generations from tyrannical officials.

[@Karen-d6v9n]

Well said! It is like they saw how things would be in the future. I too thank them.

[@buzzkill2739]

They did their best...but these "officials" today have managed to screw it up and make it look easy

[@The-Weekend-Warrior]

I am amazed by how much they don’t feel the ridicule of their situation…

[@robertrosicki9290]

The breadth and depth of Sgt. Wilson's imagination is only exceeded by his arrogance and ego . Verbal judo with Sean seemed painful for him . Beck Ya!

[@jovonmcgloun3128]

This SGT is out of control. You need to put a complaint on him. Regarding his level of disrespect.

[@ChristiaanC458]

Great Comment, i wonder what his paycheque is; please find out Sean, i think that Oldy 225.000 dollar and that disgusting Thug; i’m talking, 165.000 paid by the Public, he must be Gratefull instead being A Bully.

[@deniseb4281]

THE ONLY ONE WHO NEEDS TO PULL OUT THEIR PHONE AND LOOK UP THE CONSTITUTION IS SEARGENT WILSON AND THE REST OF THOSE OFFICERS SINCE THEY HAVE NO DAMN CLUE WHAT THEY SWORE A OATH TO

[@Jman531]

The Sargeant is a smart a**!!! The type of officer that needs to be removed from duty until he takes a refresher course in leadership.

[@lesliemccaghy9611]

Leadership??? My friends 9 year old has more itelligence!.

[@consentofthegoverned5145]

Written permission? Yeah, I have that- It was written in 1789, and became law in 1791.

[@11non-serviam11]

👍👍👍

[@CitizenJourno-1]

Sean tried to hand him a copy of the written permission. They just didn't want to look at it

[@Come1kamal]

Long Island, years down the road and you are still holding law enforcement accountable. Thank you for your efforts to make a change. 👍🏼

[@janicejackson2016]

God bless him indeed I tried doing this 45 years ago and it's got me 45 years of harassment assault and other things too long to mention I fear for his well-being he's got to have somebody with him at all times

[@tbear356]

That cop at the end is the absolute worst gaslighter I've seen amongst all the videos of cops I've seen. A perfect example of an idiot cop. He is a complete waste of taxpayer money. He should do his community a favor and quit before his obvious incompetence will eventually cost his community. Let this video be evidence of his disrespect and unprofessionalism. Dumb and ignorant make for a dangerous cop.

[@interestedparty00]

Auditors would have gone extinct 10 years ago if government employees had been capable of ignoring them. However, the ego driven control mechanisms inside their brains won’t allow that to happen for at least another 10 years.

[@grantnoroyan4083]

LOL the most ANNOYING frauditor to grace you tube he is NOT a journalist he is a you tuber! period! he does this for clicks and likes and profit NOT because he is an advocate!!!

[@dave_ryan]

@@grantnoroyan4083 You can disagree, just try not doing it with your knickers in a twist.

[@thomasspringer5187]

His whole premise is based on hypotheticals. What a tool !

[@Chucky925]

He said he doesn't go on hypotheticals but yet he has continued to use hypotheticals. How hypocritical, but that's our government....

[@StandWatie1862]

He likes to talk but not listen.

[@jimmy999-z2j]

@@StandWatie1862he is always correct - just ask him 😂

[@bradpotter6401]

Typical cop, they like to control the narrative with their lies and distortions of the law.

[@debbiesroommate]

​@@jimmy999-z2j I miss Don Rickles

[@ByeByeBS]

There is something about Sgt. Wilson that reminded me of Mitt Romney. (?)

[@rrussell9731]

I can't help but wonder how many times Wilson has manipulated a law-abiding person for his benefit.

[@OnTheArchipelago]

Yep, violated Too Apree's rights as well

[@FreeUkraine69]

No crimes comitted until he arrives@@OnTheArchipelago