Never found an explanation to this theory as good as this one!!
@isabellaellenmorison358217 күн бұрын
Very well explained and synthesised to understand. Thank you so much, and keep up the excellent work!
@mohamedgamal-fl1lb9 ай бұрын
Can't express my feelings and my appreciation to this amazing video and your effort. keep up the good work
@thubelihlekhanyi78248 жыл бұрын
I've been looking for this all over the Internet, best explanation ever. thank you very much this will be very helpful in my exam tomorrow.
@shush_16222 жыл бұрын
how was that exam
@thubelihlegwamanda35552 жыл бұрын
Lol, I really don't remember, I don't even remember what subject this is, is it physics? I passed with 92% in physics final matric results, forgot to return and say thank you
@MuhammadWaseem-ck5gn4 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much sir.. This is one of the best video available on the platform
@zyania1007 жыл бұрын
It's really very nicely explained...it has really cleared by confusion i always had...thank u so much sir
@aliceavien80285 жыл бұрын
You're a LIFESAVER sir, i have my A2 phy day after tmrw, this has really helped me
@adriansarroff18333 жыл бұрын
The best explanation on the net. I have used it countless times. Thanks
@geoffphillips81834 жыл бұрын
Brilliant explanation!! Thanks. Hope you're still doing vids in 2020 and on!!
@dr.m81615 жыл бұрын
i was much much confused in this...but by actually knowing the difference b/w flux and flux gradient graph...this concept helped me in understanding ac generator graph...😇
@AryanRaj-zw7xj6 жыл бұрын
Very nice explanation ,,my confusion is now cleared
@MrUnpaused8 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much sir ! My exam is tomorrow and this has helped cleared it all up for me. :)
@andrewvictor14896 жыл бұрын
This is one of confusion lesson for me thnx so much sir 😊😊
@saxonmckenzie-smith68222 жыл бұрын
This video was so helpful. Thank you so much!!!
@rethabilemoshesh17796 жыл бұрын
this was such a good video and very helpful!
@annabelroberts17612 жыл бұрын
This is awesome! Simple and clear. Thanks
@ronash.a7 ай бұрын
Shouldnt the emf graph start at zero though because the rate of change at the beginning of the change in flux graph is 0, and the emf graph is graphing the gradient of the change in flux. And also, from the start to the 3rd point, the graident of change in flux is negative so the emf graph would have negative points in the section but it will be flipped to positive gradients because of the negative in the emf formula. I think that make sense, idk I'm still learning.
@RizwanKhan_99 Жыл бұрын
So that's it!!!!
@muzakkir31955 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much! This was very helpful.
@ryandesilva64193 жыл бұрын
Absolute Legend! Saved my HSC no cap on god🤡🎅🎅🌚
@adrikaafrin3 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much Sir, your video really helped !
@stoveley3 жыл бұрын
Amazing help. Never understood why EMF was zero when flux was max. After the gradient, rate of change of flux you mentioned it makes complete sense
@basilsunnyalukka44916 жыл бұрын
Thank you ,sir.
@EliiBarbosa4 Жыл бұрын
Muito bom !
@sayedhassanphysics84917 жыл бұрын
Thank you Sir, for a clear explanation GO ON
@astromuhammed8 жыл бұрын
Thank you Sir, for a clear explaination
@claricea53538 жыл бұрын
Excellent explanation
@janeevangeline15244 жыл бұрын
Amazing, thank you
@abdelrhmanahmed14023 жыл бұрын
thank you for helping me
@imajeyelectrical5816 жыл бұрын
very nicely explained
@ThriveNow1234 жыл бұрын
All I don't understand is how the the change in flux is positive and great when the flux through the coil is 0
@anatolimaroz41554 жыл бұрын
Think of it this way: if magnet flux at start (ф_1) is greater than magnetic flux (ф_2) after, setting it in Δф = ф_2 - ф_1, we get a negative value. Thus if we set Δф in Faraday's law of induction, we get a positive flux in the formula. Hope this helped
@eshaghazali24825 жыл бұрын
Thanks man😭i have ny physics exam in like 6 days this was bugging me. God blesssss
@yellowcyborg47294 жыл бұрын
Isn't the last graph based on the gradient of the middle graph? So in the first section of the middle graph, gradient is 0, so the first point in the last graph is at 0. then the gradient is negative, and because the e.m.f graph is the negatie of the gradient, the second section in the last graph has a positive gradient. etc.
@sibandadavid2557Ай бұрын
Woosh finally understand ❤❤
@michahcongonyah8 жыл бұрын
Clear explanation, thanks
@tcritt7 жыл бұрын
Great video.
@jasonclegg179 жыл бұрын
Great explanation :)
@boombeachnoob36426 жыл бұрын
sir everything is fine but one doubt is that What you had drawn "GRAD of PHI" is what ? is it the effective flux present in inductor or is it the lenz's law flux which opposing change in main flux, thereby creating some effective flux./// please let me know thanks in advance.
@joshnovski40677 жыл бұрын
Could you do one about Torque graphs in motor coils in this respect?
@PsSarvna7 жыл бұрын
finally found ,this is very helpful,thanks😍😘😍😘😚
@pieduacademy2195 жыл бұрын
Sir what type of software are u using for teaching
@_oneshot_00_306 жыл бұрын
Is EMF the same as induced voltage ?
@tadimakwindi88088 ай бұрын
THANK YOU!
@sarwarsharkar95376 жыл бұрын
why emf is minus the rate of change of flux?
@kingsizetutor21735 жыл бұрын
Lenz law
@gourvi80214 жыл бұрын
Because increasing induced emf's direction is always opposite to the magnetic flux which is producing this emf. Or we can say that the emf is produced in such a way that it opposes the cause of producing this emf.
@mohammedbakkar9387 жыл бұрын
thank you sir
@nkharola46816 жыл бұрын
grt sir
@jasonoh97075 жыл бұрын
fuck man u saved my life cuz. thank you very very much!
@denzhendouvhada2814 жыл бұрын
Thank u❤️
@asmamada2092 жыл бұрын
THANK YOU
@Trevonfonseka8 жыл бұрын
did you use Microsoft paint?
@Trevonfonseka8 жыл бұрын
Romeno Wenogk so he used water colours and coloured has MacBook ?
@Trevonfonseka8 жыл бұрын
Romeno Wenogk bill gates will be mad
@Trevonfonseka8 жыл бұрын
Romeno Wenogk no I will not accept this. I'm going to suicide. tell my dogs I love them.