Great topic. I've been meaning to start incorporating Gurdjeff into my own work as well. Advice though; your videos would be much more listenable if they were more thoroughly scripted or at least if the dialogue was more thoroughly rehearsed, if word for word recitation isnt your cup of tea. It really throws off the flow when you are noticeably formulating your phrasing while speaking or searching for words. Pertaining to the content of the video itself; I wouldn't say that the Akasha is a separate type of field from morphic fields. The akashic field is more like the "morphic suprafield" which is comprised of all morphic fields; the "implicate order" as Bohm would say. I also wouldn't have brought up Alzheimer's without bringing up terminal lucidity. The Phenomenon of Alzheimer's itself doesn't pose much of a mystery that materialistic memory theories can't seemingly solve; i.e., as the physical brain degenerates, memories stored within the brain are lost. The mystery is that people with Alzheimer's can come to reclaim their memories in the final moments of their life. If the memories simply broke down with the decay of the brain, then how do they manage to resurface in this way? It's **that** which the materialistic theory can't contend with, but which morphic resonance can. Also "Boehme" is pronounced "boor-muh", not "bow-mee".
@ScriabinOTBeach10 ай бұрын
I look forward to seeing you bring Gurdjief into you videos. The Work is so fascinating, and I have no doubt you'll do the information justice. It's become a pretty important part of my worldview and my work with music, I'll be excited to see more content on it
@KevinMannix-sf5zk2 ай бұрын
Imagine an object fixated on itself, now that fixation means that the object only sees itself and the memories of itself fixating on itself, "self absorbed" Now imagine an object dissociated with the self accessing memories not of itself You know like two ends of a stick, the different directions of flow, One accessing its own data bank and the other accessing the databank of the Ancients "talking to the Elders" I mean learning to "remember yourself" can if successful only logically and rationally like all good balanced functioning machines have the same and exact opposite occurrence "happen" at the same time, due to the correct "doing" There is always going to be remembering "yourSELF" and remembering "YOURself" echoing across eternity
@marksweet6298Ай бұрын
Excellent job of merging these ideas and the theory of morphic resonance. The video gave me much to ponder on.
@Anadorado88Ай бұрын
Great video! I´ve been watching for days and taking notes. Looking forward to studying more of your content.
@megmillcar10 ай бұрын
Yep, this is good stuff right here. I closed my eyes on the second listen, to soak it all up
@sacredbloomalchemy2 ай бұрын
This is extremely interesting to me. Heard of Gurdjeff when learning about Steiner and anthroposophy with Gigi Young. This morphic resonance idea feels very true.
@thehuntfortruth3 ай бұрын
You do a great job on these videos thanks for sharing
@missinformation48433 ай бұрын
My son said he was a moon seed and he chose me. He would also talk about gravity at nursery school and freak out the staff because a toddler made them feel stupid.
@J.B.V-e6t4 ай бұрын
You are brilliant..
@Жар-птица84 ай бұрын
Thank you, brilliant 💎
@samirmutaschar59266 ай бұрын
Your work is excellent, congratulations and thank you ❤
@TroubledMinds10 ай бұрын
Great work!
@Eduard589310 ай бұрын
I won't comment on the intrinsic quality of it, but the background music is too loud, and it's distracting (and rather disturbing the whole presentation of ideas). Maybe it would be a good thing to tone it down a bit.
@stevensun110 ай бұрын
Great video and presentation of the information, I agree about background music, it needs to be lower in the background so that focus is more on the voice and visual presentation.
@FourthWayRanch8 ай бұрын
Division of attention is an important skill to learn if you want to remember yourself. I like to count by 2s and 3s to 100 and back
@lennybogart8 ай бұрын
This is true, but it is easier and more economical to only have to listen to the video once or twice rather than multiple times when you’re acquainting yourself with the system. I think the music is distracting too. Perhaps when it becomes too much, stop the video and remember yourself for a moment.
@stephenmellor92643 ай бұрын
Take off your headphones
@patriciadavies37382 ай бұрын
I totally agree. I am not able to listen to both music and talk.
@sactownsluckylady10 ай бұрын
Bravo 🙌🏼
@SavannahShepherd6698 ай бұрын
Its been a while since ive actually learned something that was exciting tysvm 😊
@northernlight716110 ай бұрын
morphic resonance posting? oh this is gonna be a good one
@northernlight716110 ай бұрын
wow what an excellent video, completely blew away my expectations, which were high to begin with. well done.
@Formscapes10 ай бұрын
Small world itnit?
@northernlight716110 ай бұрын
@@Formscapes It's lonely at the leading edge of the distribution curve
@Wesley3030310 ай бұрын
awesome
@WarClonk10 ай бұрын
Hi, you have compiled an interesting video. I want to offer some constructive criticism: 1. Lower the volume of the background music by quite a bit. It is way too loud and makes it hard to listen to you. 2. I would not choose a music that has such an "exciting atmosphere". Maybe something more soothing and slower would fit better.
@msmontana19616 ай бұрын
Joel Goldsmith, on how to Pray Must go back to Sumerians in order to understand, dr. Scott McQuate
@stephenmellor92643 ай бұрын
We know already about energy waves, etc . That's why the comments all go on about the music see.
@fabiohuther152610 ай бұрын
Thank you. I guess, the right person for morphogenetic fields would be Mr. Gurvitch. Sheldrake knows it from him. 🙏🏼
@goldangel89787 ай бұрын
Great movie.
@paulhope-sg5lr2 ай бұрын
Wow
@JamesWaltner10 ай бұрын
I love the content but not the same dreary song on repeat. no music would be much better. your voice is nice though. I always get upset when I find good content but can't get through it because of the voice.
@tylerjamesbennett340110 ай бұрын
wow
@grosbeak61303 ай бұрын
I couldn't listen to all of this, the music is too intrusive.
@gboii10 ай бұрын
banger
@sleeplessi9368110 ай бұрын
14:35 Thoth not Hermes is Egyptian,Hermes is greek ❤
@millennialbuddhism261910 ай бұрын
I get what youre saying, but theyre mostly interchangeable and are used interchangeably in hermetics and the modern western esoteric tradition pretty often.
@mdmc5692Ай бұрын
Let’s chat homie
@itsonlyapapermoon619 ай бұрын
Walter russell The secret of light
@MoniquePerzylo11 күн бұрын
The book cost is over $100. 😢
@msmontana19616 ай бұрын
You mean God Only Mans Consciousness can Evolve, nothing else can evolve in Man...Gurdjieff
@diablotarot10 ай бұрын
😀
@deadsypadilla3 ай бұрын
Aether documentary Marcia Romalho youtube...
@FourthWayRanch8 ай бұрын
What keeps the moons of other planets in orbit if they have no deranged three brained beings for food?
@KevinMannix-sf5zk5 ай бұрын
Your first thought is its only literal ? The man is constantly highlighting that there are words and nonsense that need to be interpreted correctly to understand his teachings just like all the religious texts "its easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than it is for a rich man to walk through the gates of heaven" That's most of the lesson , to ignore the words of others and use your own sense of discrimination to understand these texts And its objective , meaning people can comprehend thousands of years apart , the exact same knowledge
@mdmc5692Ай бұрын
Your next post should represent. Not propose
@eugeniaberdali97116 күн бұрын
HERMES is not an Egyptian god. If he is, please trace for me the etymology , or pronounce the name in ancient Egyptian. Perhaps you mean Toth or Hermes Trismegistus who is a Hellenistic combination of the two deities. The point is that (completely unknown) Nicholl (who believed he was greater than Jung - HAHAHAHA) prayed to a deity that was supposed to be related to wisdom. Hermes was NOT related to wisdom. So was Nicholl confused on this too, or it is you - the speaker- that is confused. You see inaccuracies like this make the whole video UNRELIABLE. So eventually, who answered Nicholl? Because, it seems to me that he probably was praying to himself.
@melvincalp341810 ай бұрын
*stairs*
@mdmc5692Ай бұрын
Dr. You tube.
@patrickconnolly265418 күн бұрын
The cosmos 🤔🤔🤔 ? We have a responsibility to maintain/promote a cosmic order.?( Not to God 😊)
@richardjones79842 ай бұрын
Too much waffle. Meaningless terms thrown out undefined and not in a coherent stream. The speech of the presenter is like that of some sort of acoustically challenged robot. Shame because the subject is interesting but this is too painful to listen to.
@mdmc5692Ай бұрын
You explain yourself and then nothing. Does it satisfy you?