Harriet Hageman Touts Bill Requiring Agencies To Disclose Economic Effects Of Regulations

[@AcmePotatoPackingPocatello]

She rocks ! Harriet Hageman is a STAR. ..thank you WYOMING !

[@DeadBoy665]

A far better representative than Liz Cheney could ever have been.

[@trishmeshell8521]

Amen

[@mriccardi825]

Sadly that's not a very high bar 😂

[@suzannewing7574]

Thank you, Harriet!!!

[@enginca]

Harriet Hageman is a real attribute to this country. She's a very smart woman.

[@johnlilly2991]

Harriet Hageman is one of the best I’ve seen in 60 years 👍🇺🇸

[@trishmeshell8521]

Show your work Act!! It’s so shameless that an Act is required for these Bureaucrats YET in K-12 math requires that every student show their work as to how they derive at the number/answer!! Love and Respect to Harriet Hageman!

[@thetroytroycan]

Wow. U need to run. Common sense.

[@Cynthia-rt2mz]

My sentiments EXACTLY. Fire the person deliberately deceiving Congress! Why a break down wasn't included, and zero repercussion; quite appalling.

[@annwynn4827]

What a brilliant Congresswoman!!!

[@wrldvw1836]

Thank you Rep Hage an

[@stephenmitchell6368]

Representative Hageman is SO great an improvement over disgraced Liz Cheney! If the people replaced RINO's and Democrats with people of Rep. Hageman's quality, the Republic would be well on its way back to fiscal and moral health. Her work thus far is OUTSTANDING!

[@williamwright9144]

She is president material..she IS a representative..awesome lady..

[@jackiedewine9718]

Harriet Hageman - great work! So proud you represent Wyoming and what’s right and good for all honest Americans. Thank you! 🇺🇸🇺🇸❤️🇺🇸🇺🇸

[@copperjacket00]

cooking the books , liberals

[@MaryDixonSmilla13]

There are way too many regulations on everything and so bad for business

[@Things_I_wish_I_knew]

It's bad for everyone..... I get why they were seen as a good thing at 1st but as time has gone forward they became progressively more ridiculous and made it harder and harder for smaller businesses to become profitable and competitive thus ensuring these bigger companies had less and less competition and could monopolize on the market.

[@ozranch9479]

Rep. Hageman is always the smartest person in the room.

[@richardgiacomotti404]

THE DAYS OF BEING A CORRUPT CRIMINAL ARE OVER! CASE CLOSED!

[@jimyoung-h3z]

This should happen and efficiency and very high productivity needs to be the key to every government employee

[@randyrqbbins9931]

Great replacement for Liz.

[@kimwiser445]

That sounds like a great bill!!!!!

[@spartacusavengence9431]

That’s actually a sensible bill

[@finn3408]

CUT ALL FEDERAL TAXES ON ALL AMERICANS.

[@garypascucci5797]

Regulations are not Laws, and "Chevron is overruled" per Clarence Thomas & the Supreme Court 👊

[@WildBill-s2i]

Thank you Miss Hageman for being on top of things. You should throw your hat into the House Speaker ring. There are several hard core women that should be Speaker..

[@GeorgeDoughty-m8e]

Problem is, they don't know the effects of their regulations.

[@newlifelodge]

Then they can’t enact any regulation at all u til they do know the effects

[@jerryshelton1481]

Every dime should be accounted for if not then agency has questioned and ones responsible for not keeping track be held accountable the government expects us to be completely accurate with our taxes least they can give us the same respect

[@joesphreiley7757]

Love Hageman, she is a very bright individual and a true patriot.

[@mikerieck306]

She is a smart gal...enjoy listening to her.

[@FJB-NOW]

BRAVO Harriet !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[@michaelkendall662]

how about BANNING any agency from creating regulations.....that is a power for CONGRESS.......agencies (if they are even constitutional) have the power to enforce properly enacted regulations

[@RhodaRamirezdearellano]

What? You want to make Congress actually WORK! And be attributable for the chaos they create? Shame SHAME!

[@CharlesHoward-ud6qv]

Brilliant plain and simple

[@icu8128]

Remember figures lie and liars figure. Wash, rinse and repeat.

[@Mike-rv4it]

How about Congress disclose the kickbacks from funding bioweapons labs in foreign countries.

[@dianachase7867]

Harriet Hagerman for Doge!!!!

[@Bay0Wulf]

GOOD for Hageman EVERY ONE of these “Agencies” SHOULD be Required to show HOW and WHERE they got “Their Numbers” AND HOW EVERY Penny was Spent and face severe “claw back” and dismissals for Failure to Do So.

[@andrewfisher8749]

Long overdue

[@Bearfacts01]

Love Harriet.

[@toomignon]

We need transparency on how many agencies regulate things. You can get the appropriate permits for things and nobody tells you that 4 other agencies have separate permit processes. Our federal government is so huge that one agency has no idea what other agencies are doing. It's rediculous.

[@cannotsay5505]

I agree, but this is only a starting place.

[@anleekij]

If you want 4 opinions on the economy ask 2 economists. This bill is pointless

[@mikebarker9467]

Get the lie detator, it will short out from all there lies

[@jaybryant5691]

That would be interesting.

[@Del-Canada]

Hi.

[@JamesCvitkovich]

This will give them something to lie about

[@Roundwave23]

"There is only one difference between a bad economist and a good one: the bad economist confines himself to the visible effect; the good economist takes into account both the effect that can be seen and those effects that must be foreseen." -Frederic Bastiat

[@texasgrillchef8581]

Well tat regulation by itself will cost millions of dollars. Lol

[@RhodaRamirezdearellano]

True. But is also might, just might slow down the proliferation of unnecessary regulations.

[@howardjones2021]

I think this type of disclosure and analysis is appropriate. However, I don't trust the agencies to to do the math..... The CBO is virtually always wrong.

[@thetroytroycan]

Im in awe of this woman. I look at her and I'm jealous of her commom sense brilliance and beauty. Said it before, shes gonna turn me straight if shes keeps it up lol. Merry Christmas hegeman. What a woman.

[@Sometungsten]

12.25.24 Date? Committee?

[@jsbrads1]

They will just lie 🥴

[@matthewwain9958]

This title is a big one. The financial implications of things like the EPA regulations... How much more is it costing the consumer/citizen for these over zealous regulations? Wastage of resources from having cars becoming financially unrepairable due to insanely expensive emissions equipment etc.

[@johnmurray8267]

Wish Australia did this as our Government is way out of control. 🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺

[@CraigCharley]

Republican lawmakers are asking for military assistance President Biden, today is the day American people realize who is in control of military intelligence to government affairs

[@RevKaty-x8k]

Thanks for the analysis! I have a quick question: My OKX wallet holds some USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). What's the best way to send them to Binance?

[@andrewthomas405]

WHEN YOU HEAR REPUBLICANS TALK IT GIVES YOU HOPE ….BUT THEY ASLO NEED TO TREAD MORE CARFULLY SO THEY ARE NOT CAUGHT OUT IN THEIR TRUTH I WISH WE HAD ANY REPUBLICAN STYLE POLITICIANS IN THE UK ..BUT MOST ARE WILLING TO PUT FOREIGN INTEREST FIRST WHICH IS TREASON

[@55steelhead]

I can’t figure out why Trump hasn’t tagged this lady for some position in his cabinet?

[@veronicaelliott9582]

Because she is smart

[@timdavis3733]

And which party do you suppose would vote against this. Well the one that wants the American people kept in the dark. If you are a liberal and disagree with my assessment please give us yours.

[@LS-he9xb]

Duh

[@MarkKoerner-c8c]

This is an anti-regulation idea sponsored by a generally anti-regulation person. It raises any number of issues, the most important probably being: how do we measure the economic cost of regulations? Suppose a regulatory agency requires expensive retrofits/additions to certain machinery to make them safe. That's as far as Hagman wants to go, I suspect. But to take into account the full cost--or get a true accounting--of the additions, one must look at the economic benefits of imposing such a regulation. Foremost among these might be, e.g., 12 hands and 140 fingers saved over the course of 10 years. There is an economic cost to the loss of these hands and fingers, isn't there? And isn't even that cost a bit hazy, as one does not know exactly how to limit the time frame? (Should we include lost wages for only 10 years? How about for the working life of the injured worker?) Does Hagman propose to attempt to measure this cost, too? I think we know the answer. She wants to keep everything as simple as possible so that we end up thinking that most new regulations are a bad idea. (If we could come up with a good faith formula for regulatory costs, I would favor that, but I don't trust Hagman to do it.)

[@newlifelodge]

No one asked you. You lost the election. These are OUR people doing what we hired them to do.

[@rodpoll6162]

You have no clue how many thousands and thousands of unnecessary regs are out there.

[@MarkKoerner-c8c]

@@rodpoll6162 You might be right. But how do you separate the good from the bad from "doesn't do much good but doesn't do much harm, either"? Takes a lot of work, but I think a key might be to leave that third category alone for now. Another approach: Start examining the oldest regulations, the ones passed when the Code of Federal Regulations was just getting started. The economy has changed enough that some of those are probably unnecessary.