Look up all my videos on Nuclear and Particle Physics in the following playlist : kzbin.info/aero/PLRN3HroZGu2n_j3Snd_fSYNLvCkao8HIx
@sudharanikuram5 жыл бұрын
We could feel how much you love physics in every sentence you speak.
@ZeeshanAli-nh4bl3 жыл бұрын
Nice lecture sir
@deepakkotnala16585 жыл бұрын
Seriously wow...too much clearity in voice Nd your containt... Thank you sir
@Shackled2 жыл бұрын
America needs more professors like you! You presentations are so clear and concise
@admiralhyperspace00153 жыл бұрын
Woah, dude the precision at this age, you will be one of the best teachers period
@merlinprincess14704 жыл бұрын
Your lectures are too good Sir. It makes me understand the subject in a easy manner. please continue to give more videos. you are a good physics teacher.
@kumailhaider79334 жыл бұрын
Excellent sir...........KZbin pay koi dosra aap jaisa maine nahi Dekha .....love from pak
@sujitbaruah45364 жыл бұрын
It's a brilliant lecture you have successfully imparted the mathematical cocept and the physical implication of Parity. Excellent. I would like to suggest every student of physics to follow you.
@jaydeepraijada51595 жыл бұрын
Awesome... Best Explains.. Thank you so much sir.
@c_neutrino5 жыл бұрын
To the best of my Knowledge...this is my first comment on YT. Amazing Work Sir ji! Good work needs appreciation:)
@astrophysicsdelban75505 жыл бұрын
acchha ???stanzin hea...hehe...pura series dekh its good....
@c_neutrino5 жыл бұрын
@@astrophysicsdelban7550 Sure bro...😂
@maryfelber9784 Жыл бұрын
You do an excellent job explaining the basics. Thank you so much. Students need you.
@Phyziks_Enlightenment_5 жыл бұрын
sir i'm a hindu college student... really thankfull for your effort u made for us...teachers like you make us feel that we are in india's topmost university ...thanks a lot sir❣️ but sir i think you should also talk about the degeneracy of energy eigenvalue here for this case...
@sibgha9855 жыл бұрын
Thirdly you are doing very good work. I really appreciate you because your lectures help a lot for students like me.
@kayrstar89654 жыл бұрын
If u just want to know what a parity operator is ...this is one of the best vid i have found...also i prefer this type of teaching style where tools required for a topic are taught when they are required...and not like paile apan maths develop karenge,,,aur jabtak tum pehla sikhaya hua sab bhool jaoge tab mei tumhe wo apply kaise karte hai wo sikhaunga ;;;love u sir ♥
@manojitparamanik6146 Жыл бұрын
awesome...!!! so detailed explanation of parity..! Thank you sir!
@voisketch65134 жыл бұрын
Great work.. clearly explain everything..u are to be a physics teacher
@akshitatiwari13 жыл бұрын
I can't thank you enough sir ,you are doing a great job .
@mohammedheneen6 жыл бұрын
Great 👍 teacher
@josecarlosparedesmalaga95474 жыл бұрын
Excelente video saludos desde Perú
@Dr.kcMishra6 жыл бұрын
Your work is Great sir....
@vishalsuri93714 жыл бұрын
It was a great video. Thanks sir. Your teachinh ability is very very nice.
@EDUGADHVI4 жыл бұрын
💫🙏💫🙏thanks a lot sir 😍
@rahulmondal87662 жыл бұрын
Your lecture is awesome sir💖💖🔥. Waiting for your full physics course.... 🌚🌚🌚
@arpanadhikari38114 жыл бұрын
Very well explained. Cleared my doubts.
@armenpoghosyan4998 Жыл бұрын
Love your videos, great work!
@zafariqbaliqbal97285 жыл бұрын
Outstanding sir...
@rambalas50057 ай бұрын
Very well explained. Thanks
@Amityphysics5 жыл бұрын
very very.......... nice thank you sir for deppely knowledge
@estefaniac73242 жыл бұрын
Amazing explanation, thank you so much!!
@bryanortiz20983 жыл бұрын
Excellent explanation
@sibgha9855 жыл бұрын
And secondly I want to ask which book you recommend for nuclear physic
@chinnikitchen6194 жыл бұрын
Very well taught sir Thank you
@ramyamore52012 жыл бұрын
Super teaching sir
@geetakandhol96313 жыл бұрын
Well explained sir....
@info-hub457 Жыл бұрын
sir can you make a playlist of solid state physics
@gintoki68113 жыл бұрын
I got question, in video about symmetric and asymmetric WF you've said that sym case is for bosons and asym case for fermions, so in harmonic oscl potential different particles ( bosons and fermion) will go through 1 level,? thank you
@chayanroy37232 жыл бұрын
Nice and clear explanation ,sir
@subhash_10124 жыл бұрын
Thanks for give such videos
@shivamkushwah61795 жыл бұрын
sir please explain what is the physical significance of parity ,what does it mean when we say parity is conserved or not conserved does parity explains about the properties of particles ? when we say parity is conserved does that mean all properties will be same every where in universe and if not conserved properties will be change ?????
@DrDeuteron3 жыл бұрын
See: "Noether's Theorem". If your system has a discrete symmetry (such as parity), then there is a multiplicative conserved quantum number in the solutions. It means you won't ever mix even/odd operators, e.g., a situation where a vector like momentum p is a proportional to an axial vector like magnetic field B. won't happen. For instance, if a beta decay is aligned with a magnetic field: p ~ B, then beta decay violates parity (and it does).
@sibgha9855 жыл бұрын
Sir please make more video like linear accelerator,van de graff generator, synchrocylotron,proton synchrotron,betatron,photographic emulsion. I'm waiting for your next videos
@FortheLoveofPhysics5 жыл бұрын
Working on it
@harshit91122 жыл бұрын
Sir is this lecture also a part of nuclear physics??????
@kailashgedekar19723 жыл бұрын
Sir your teaching skill is ver nice. Sir plz csir quantum syllabus pe sequentially video banai ye na numerical ke sath hindi me
@jatinbhatt78265 жыл бұрын
It is a complete mathematical explanation that we know from text books also , what I want to know is that what it describe physically when a partical has symmetrical and asymmetric wave function or even odd functions ?? Although the probability distribution is same for both of the cases .
@FortheLoveofPhysics5 жыл бұрын
Everything i teach here can be found from textbooks. I have not discovered anything new. The books which provide this mathematics also gives physical interpretation. Pls look that up.
@jatinbhatt78265 жыл бұрын
@@FortheLoveofPhysics The words of books are like puzzles and as I m watching your lecture , I hv realized that you kind of unfold that thing or you tell us the another way to look the same things , that's your beauty sir . Anyways I will dieve into the text book one more time .
@samuelhawksworth77198 ай бұрын
Fantastic thank you!
@benlubanga3 ай бұрын
Question> What exactly does parity do to a wave function, on a large scale, at atom level, what do we see?
@vaibhavprajapati36445 жыл бұрын
Superb sirji..
@asthatewari28306 жыл бұрын
Is the parity same for 2D n 3D harmonic oscillator for their respective excited states?
@FortheLoveofPhysics6 жыл бұрын
For a 3D harmonic oscillator like V(x) =(1/2)mw^2(x^2+y^2+z^2) which is "radially symmetric" or spherically symmetric, then their solutions will also consist of even and odd parity wavefunctions. However that will depend on azimuthal quantum number, l. So parity will be dependent on (-1)^l, i.e. if its -1 it will be odd parity, and for 1 it will be even parity
@mysterywoman81583 жыл бұрын
Thank you Sir :)
@pquantum693 жыл бұрын
Nice video❤👍🏻
@unplandsitch3 жыл бұрын
Very nice video, thanks! Btw the Schrödinger Equation is pronounced with a sh sound in the beginning :)
@medicalpanorama3 жыл бұрын
Photon and Electron are not same*. In beta decay (-), nucleus decay to proton is energy preferred (high to low)* gamma ray emission. gamma ray emission is related to liberation of electron from nucleus, but the direction of electron liberation has nothing to do with the direction of gamma ray*. An example,
@medicalpanorama3 жыл бұрын
Watch the Stern- Gerlach Experiment, it also proves that the direction of exiting light or light mass silver ( ‘silver’ atom is visible light, even though the gross light carrier here is mass silver) HAS NOTHING to do with the direction of rotational electron that around its nucleus! The reason I said the silver atom is visible light because light isn’t a phenomenon without a material carrier or a mass. So, when you visibly “see” mass silver, it means you see the “light”; just like “you see the mass photon, you see the light”. Even though the “light” here is intimately related with electrons in the mass silver. If “light” is aligned with “electron direction” in Stern-Gerlach experiment, the light mass silver or LIGHT exiting direction should be aligned with its compound “electron direction”. That’s not the case!!! Interpret it correctly: Light direction has NOTHING to do with direction of Electrons!! Furthermore, light and electron may intimately associated, but they ain’t the same. Also, in Beta (-) decay reaction: The distribution of the emitted electrons CAN NOT compared to the distribution of the emitted gamma rays or light mass photon (mass photon instead of mass silver here) in order to compare whether they too were being emitted isotropically!!!
@MPT.Science.Hub.4 жыл бұрын
Love from Pak💞
@achmadazmirahmanu41883 жыл бұрын
Did you make video about quantum entanglement or quantum eraser? If yes could you give me the site address. And if havent make it yet, could you teach us about it, because I think your online course give better understanding than others. Tankyou
@sonu91174 жыл бұрын
great sir.
@rakshitpatwal87285 жыл бұрын
Great teaching style.........👍
@FortheLoveofPhysics5 жыл бұрын
Thank you :)
@atirix94594 жыл бұрын
How does parity affect the ways that the square well wave functions can change state by photon emission?
@DrDeuteron3 жыл бұрын
photon is a vector particle, as in the perturbation is V'(x) = Ex. Which is an odd function. Hence, a transition amplitude looks like
@suryaprakash28863 жыл бұрын
Thank you alot sir , subscribed
@MohitKumar-xh6fp5 жыл бұрын
Good lecture
@red-baitingswine88165 жыл бұрын
So, then,... I suspect that for any solid object, (x, y, z) -> (-x, -y, -z) of all its points results in a mirror image - just like (x, y, z) -> (x, y, -z) (corresponding more closely to standing in front of a mirror) does. (?) (I had to think for a while to come up with that - it was temporarily a sticking point.)
@DrDeuteron3 жыл бұрын
right, the mirror transformation is parity plus a rotation...so it has the same essentials as the pure "P". What matters is the determinant of the transformation matrix. If it is negative, parity has been flipped.
@ajithg65023 жыл бұрын
Sir , camera focussing on the board is to be increase d.👍👍👍
@blissfulbeing44416 жыл бұрын
Wonderful sir....
@NotchtheCreeper4 жыл бұрын
Thanks so much
@meetvyas7794 жыл бұрын
Sir plzz make videos on Dirac notation
@ajithg65023 жыл бұрын
Sooopper teacher. Sir , Plese start a channel for CBSE PHYSICS .,NEET PHYSICS,JEE PHYSICS.
@suprabhatghosh23874 жыл бұрын
why parity is not conserved in beta decay?
@FortheLoveofPhysics4 жыл бұрын
Its is because neutrinos emitted in beta (positive) decay for example are left-handed, while anti-neutrinos emitted in beta (negative) decay are right-handed, i.e the spin and direction of motion of neutinos and anti-neutrinos can be easily distinguished when compared to their "mirror" images. This leads to the violation of parity..
@suprabhatghosh23874 жыл бұрын
@@FortheLoveofPhysics thanks allot sir.
@sajidmajeed5594 жыл бұрын
outstanding
@vikaskrjangra3 жыл бұрын
Thanku
@aca7448 Жыл бұрын
I have a nuclear physics test tomorrow and I'm literally making a video marathon
@piyushshrivastava92244 жыл бұрын
Aap B. Sc and M. Sc ki video a/c some university syllabus banao
@bds2.o2674 жыл бұрын
Superb
@bds2.o2674 жыл бұрын
Sir aapne quantum ki starting se videos uploade kar rkhi h kya
@nagarjunreddykandimalla98184 жыл бұрын
Sir your teaching is amazing and great teaching skills with good and clarity explanation.
@nehatyagi1413 жыл бұрын
👏👏
@amankumarxah45235 жыл бұрын
Just WOW
@nitishkaushik42992 жыл бұрын
♥️
@yisun85245 жыл бұрын
Come teach quantum mechanics at Imperial
@SomeOne-zx3go Жыл бұрын
Playlist not properly arranged Random videos in playlist👎😒
@nadeemahmad91383 жыл бұрын
sir apna phone number send karna
@Antarjyoti-c3i5 жыл бұрын
It's not skrodinger. .. please pronounce in the correct way....(sro not skro)
@dmckown97555 жыл бұрын
math and evolution do not match.
@FortheLoveofPhysics5 жыл бұрын
How?
@dmckown97555 жыл бұрын
@@FortheLoveofPhysics mostly evolution is many chances for something to happen but math is not governed by evolution. Math is like a natural law because math is used to explain natural laws. Now if it all came about by chance then math would not explain it as good as it does. Math in all its wonderful disciplines was there before the universe was. I know it is not a good thing to believe in an intelligent designer but if you are honest you will not be able to get away from it.