Forward Kinematics of Industrial Robot | Part 1| Robotics 201

  Рет қаралды 9,936

Engineering Simplified

Engineering Simplified

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 12
@EngineeringSimplified
@EngineeringSimplified 2 жыл бұрын
✍Any Questions, doubts, or thoughts? Comment below (I read & respond to every comment). 👉Don't forget to SUBSCRIBE to the channel for more such videos & courses: bit.ly/Engineering-Simplified
@moatazseghyar8554
@moatazseghyar8554 2 жыл бұрын
Keep up the good stuff brother this is really good
@EngineeringSimplified
@EngineeringSimplified 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much, Moataz! As long as people find my content useful, I will continue making these videos :)
@shruthipk2031
@shruthipk2031 Жыл бұрын
how did you get the detailed matrix in 07:35 ?
@EngineeringSimplified
@EngineeringSimplified 10 ай бұрын
These are the rotation matrices of the robot about Z and Y axis. You might want to watch this video first in which I explain these rotation matrices and how they are derived: kzbin.info/www/bejne/kH_GlYx6fLVghqM
@malladinagasubhash
@malladinagasubhash Жыл бұрын
I have a doubt regarding the First and third joint. Aren't they twisting joints ?. Can you please explain why did you call them as revolute joints.
@EngineeringSimplified
@EngineeringSimplified Жыл бұрын
Yes you are right. They are also called twist joints. Usually you can call the same joints a number of names which depends on which direction you are looking at them from. If you are looking at this joint along the direction of the link, then it seems to twist. If you are looking from the side, it seems to 'revolve' around an axis. In the books and literature, you can find it referred to with a bunch of different names with the most common being an 'R' or revolute joint. Hope that clarifies the confusion.
@malladinagasubhash
@malladinagasubhash Жыл бұрын
@@EngineeringSimplified Thank you
@EngineeringSimplified
@EngineeringSimplified Жыл бұрын
Glad to have helped!
@zeeshankhan2639
@zeeshankhan2639 2 жыл бұрын
@fouadfouad-kg6kl
@fouadfouad-kg6kl Жыл бұрын
the frams are not well done rereed the DH convention
@EngineeringSimplified
@EngineeringSimplified Жыл бұрын
The frames can be easily represented from this representation to the DH convention. They both are representing the same information. I just like this convention to be more intuitive.
Solving Forward Kinematics of Industrial Robot  | Robotics 201
12:26
Engineering Simplified
Рет қаралды 4 М.
Inverse Kinematics of Robots | Robotics 101
9:41
Engineering Simplified
Рет қаралды 70 М.
IL'HAN - Qalqam | Official Music Video
03:17
Ilhan Ihsanov
Рет қаралды 700 М.
人是不能做到吗?#火影忍者 #家人  #佐助
00:20
火影忍者一家
Рет қаралды 20 МЛН
What is a Jacobian Matrix | Physical Interpretation
12:23
GradXY
Рет қаралды 12 М.
me 5243 - 24.2 -representing spatial mechanisms: DH parameters
14:30
Inverse kinematics of a ball balancing robot.
8:52
Koshiro Robot Creator
Рет қаралды 17 М.
Intro2Robotics Lecture 7b: Forward to Inverse Kinematics example
12:32
Inverse or Forward kinematics Explained under 3 minutes
2:54
5.1 Inverse Kinematics
8:54
Woolfrey
Рет қаралды 71 М.