When you supersize the airforce you get this…- F-16XL

  Рет қаралды 460,118

Found And Explained

Found And Explained

Күн бұрын

Merch Store!
www.foundandex...
NEW CHANNEL:
• Launched from the bigg...
Discord: / discord
My News Channel: / @aviationstationyt
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @foundandexplained
Patreon:
/ foundandexplained

Пікірлер: 644
@h.cedric8157
@h.cedric8157 5 ай бұрын
*Pierre Sprey* : claims to have designed the F-16/15 *H.J. Hillaker* : "You're not that guy."
@Steve_Raglan_aka_William_Afton
@Steve_Raglan_aka_William_Afton 5 ай бұрын
Pierre Sprey actually claimed to designed the F-15 and F-35 but not the F-16
@croc-biteplays5337
@croc-biteplays5337 5 ай бұрын
@@Steve_Raglan_aka_William_Afton no what till his death he hated the f35 not surprising as he cant wrap his head around anything
@sorrento114
@sorrento114 5 ай бұрын
“I’m that guy”
@abinodattil6422
@abinodattil6422 4 ай бұрын
lol is that u amos
@Pokedee112
@Pokedee112 3 ай бұрын
He also claimed he helped in building the A-10
@pickleboi5548
@pickleboi5548 5 ай бұрын
When he said fighter mafia, the laserpig inside me woke up
@ansonellis443
@ansonellis443 5 ай бұрын
Bro I feel you.
@justinkemp4019
@justinkemp4019 4 ай бұрын
Me too, real engineer also made the same mistake
@felixknorpp2803
@felixknorpp2803 4 ай бұрын
It felt like Lazerpig was coming inside of me
@seyramamezah3815
@seyramamezah3815 4 ай бұрын
​@@felixknorpp2803 pause. I understand what you mean. I agree but..... Pause
@katherineberger6329
@katherineberger6329 5 ай бұрын
The Light Fighter Mafia (later rebranded itself the "Fighter Mafia" after the F-15 was a rousing success that combined high performance and heavy payload in one airframe) was far less influential than they want people to think in historical retrospect. They were right in broad strokes, but the way they were right is actually extremely trivial (and they were extremely guilty of pushing things like James Burton's horrifically flawed "Blitzfighter" concept that would have gotten every single man flying it killed - and no, Blitzfighter was not a "precursor" to the A-10 Warthog, it was an attempt to design a smaller, stripped-down, COMPLETELY VULNERABLE A-10 Warthog and it was laughed out of the room every time it was introduced). "A plane with high thrust and low weight will be a better dogfighter than a plane with moderate thrust and high weight"? NO FUCKING SHIT! The LFM wanted to take the things that made the F-16 a worthwhile fighter aircraft away from it, and leave it as a single-engine light fighter with a maximum capacity of four Sidewinders - and they didn't even really want the Sidewinders.
@mamarussellthepie3995
@mamarussellthepie3995 5 ай бұрын
Oof, lol Yeah
@pyronuke4768
@pyronuke4768 5 ай бұрын
I'm half convinced the USAF went ahead with the LWF program just to get these guys to shut up.
@croc-biteplays5337
@croc-biteplays5337 5 ай бұрын
yea like how do people still believe there shit
@croc-biteplays5337
@croc-biteplays5337 5 ай бұрын
one of them wanted the f15 to carry all its fuel externaly and glide back to base
@katherineberger6329
@katherineberger6329 5 ай бұрын
@@croc-biteplays5337 the F-16, honestly should have had a more capable radar and more fuel from the outset. The viper has to sortie with bags for just about everything, and that’s a problem.
@Jun-o3l6t
@Jun-o3l6t 5 ай бұрын
Pierre sprey and the fighter mafia being given any credit is a massive red flag to the validity of anything said in this video tbh They were horrible designers with wrong predictions, Sprey wasnt even a designer he was a jazz label producer who lied to gain fame with his ludicrous claims
@gort8203
@gort8203 5 ай бұрын
Sprey was a scammer who was eventually proved wrong. Even though the Gulf War proved him and his fellow travelers in the liberal media wrong, he tried to point to that war as proof of what he had advocated. That's hutzpah. It's amazing anyone listened to him, and that was only due to his skill at self-promotion.
@katherineberger6329
@katherineberger6329 3 ай бұрын
Sprey was there to help the LFM on the publicity front. He wasn't an aviation engineer, but he knew how to sell product.
@pyronuke4768
@pyronuke4768 5 ай бұрын
I find it funny that Hillaker was the only member of the Fighter Mafia who was actually qualified to design a plane, and he tends to be among the lesser known members due to being one of the more reserved ones and even began to distance himself from the group in later years, wich I think speaks volumes.
@Spaceman20150
@Spaceman20150 5 ай бұрын
The fighter maffia where not good designers They also said that these things are useless: radar, radio, advanced sensors, missiles and other things that are crucial in today’s air to air landscape
@Willtabixx
@Willtabixx 5 ай бұрын
Didnt they also try and use civilian handheld radios for communication?
@baguette2117
@baguette2117 5 ай бұрын
What do you mean? How could early World War 2 air doctrine be outdated???
@Spaceman20150
@Spaceman20150 5 ай бұрын
@@Willtabixx they wanted no radio at all I believe Only after pressure from the usaf did they add a radio
@pseudotasuki
@pseudotasuki 5 ай бұрын
Literally stopped watching when Pierre Sprey's photo popped up.
@Chilly_Billy
@Chilly_Billy 5 ай бұрын
​@pseudotasuki 🤣 Glad I'm not alone.
@Willtabixx
@Willtabixx 5 ай бұрын
Pierre sprey was NOT an aviation engineer. He was a record producer, do research
@Spaceman20150
@Spaceman20150 5 ай бұрын
Finally someone who understands
@M18Hellcat-17
@M18Hellcat-17 5 ай бұрын
The whole fighter mafia is a load of shit.
@Willtabixx
@Willtabixx 5 ай бұрын
@@M18Hellcat-17 agreed
@Willtabixx
@Willtabixx 5 ай бұрын
@@Spaceman20150 well of course, I actually did my own research and watched laserpig
@Spaceman20150
@Spaceman20150 5 ай бұрын
@@Willtabixx yeah The fighter maffia was conplete bullshit and if they got their way the f16 would NOT look like it does now
@khoatran-sv7je
@khoatran-sv7je 5 ай бұрын
Still sad to see the blasphemy of Fighter Mafia being spread around, I've lost all respect for Pierre Spray. And regarding the F16XL, regarding how much of a significant improvement it was in all aspects, from weaponry, range, payload, fuel economy, etc; the air force really should've kept the F16XL. Would've opened up so many options for it today.
@blairscartoonshistory7477
@blairscartoonshistory7477 5 ай бұрын
Funny how the Fighter mafia claims to hate missiles while they claim to build aircraft with lots of missiles on them
@lim-kun
@lim-kun 5 ай бұрын
Ahh the falcon dorito *Wizard squadron flashbacks*
@Neteboy2020
@Neteboy2020 5 ай бұрын
@m.sydneyvern2260
@m.sydneyvern2260 5 ай бұрын
@Arrow_118
@Arrow_118 5 ай бұрын
"No rules in a dogfight. You just have to take the enemy down."
@ThudBlue
@ThudBlue 5 ай бұрын
PJ : "Target Acquired. There's Four of Them!. They Approaching on The Front"
@Daniel94484
@Daniel94484 4 ай бұрын
@Iskelderon
@Iskelderon 5 ай бұрын
Nice thing about the 16 being a cheap parts collection and modular from the start is that it can also serve as the basis for a shitload of experiments, hence why NASA loves them as a starting point.
@MaDmanEXE
@MaDmanEXE 5 ай бұрын
This is why we have LazerPig on speed dial.
@zee_terminator2850
@zee_terminator2850 5 ай бұрын
So he can say incorrect things and call people names?
@Sveta7
@Sveta7 5 ай бұрын
​@@zee_terminator2850And be a pig?
@zee_terminator2850
@zee_terminator2850 5 ай бұрын
@@Sveta7 i mean thats just by the nature of his stupidity
@Evolution_Kills
@Evolution_Kills 5 ай бұрын
@@zee_terminator2850 Oh no, show us where on the T-14 the bad Scotsman touched you...
@alessandrozampa6642
@alessandrozampa6642 5 ай бұрын
oh boy oh boy he did not just say engineers and fighter mafia in the same sentence
@WolfeSaber9933
@WolfeSaber9933 5 ай бұрын
The rumored F-36 Kingsnake makes use of a wing similar to the F-16XL.
@katherineberger6329
@katherineberger6329 5 ай бұрын
Let's call it what it is: Fantasized. Not "rumored." The F-16 and F-35 are both built by Lockheed Martin. There is NO REALISTIC WAY that LM is going to offer air forces a product that internally competes with their own flagship aircraft.
@tripwire3992
@tripwire3992 5 ай бұрын
@@katherineberger6329the UK could do with f16's. The eurofighter aint that good imma be real
@WolfeSaber9933
@WolfeSaber9933 5 ай бұрын
@@katherineberger6329 Then why are they in the competition for the NGAD program? A program that will replace their flagships.
@TylerSmithMusic1
@TylerSmithMusic1 5 ай бұрын
@@katherineberger6329there is more than one role needing played by aircraft. It isn’t one that rules them all.
@tatthangnguyenxuan9621
@tatthangnguyenxuan9621 5 ай бұрын
The USAF has no need for a jet like that to replace the F16
@Swindle1984
@Swindle1984 20 күн бұрын
It is the year 2024, in an alternate timeline. The US air force has a fleet of 1,000 F-16XL's, 500 F-15EX's, 750 F-22A's, 250 FB-22's, 100 B1R's, 20 B-2's, and is currently upgrading its fleet of B-52's and acquiring the B-21. A replacement for the A-10 is undergoing testing, being basically the same design but improved in every way, such as upgrading to a 40mm gun based on the polymer-cased, telescoped ammo for the UK's Ajax vehicle for maximum firepower. The F-35 was canceled due to being a moneypit that didn't work as advertised. The US navy has a fleet of F/A-18's, but instead of the Super Hornet, they have a fleet of Super Attack 21 Tomcats and a naval derivative of the F-22. The Marines have their Hornets and a fleet of new-build Harriers upgraded with modern technology derived from other fighter jets, including the canceled F-35, to the point it barely resembles the original aircraft except for its mission role and VTOL capabilities. US air power reigns supreme. The space shuttle was retired and replaced with a new, modern design more in line with the original NASA design rather than the cludged one the air force forced on them before ditching the project, NERVA rockets are lifting massive payloads into orbit on a monthly basis, there is a permanent base on the moon, construction has begun on the first O'Neill Island 3 space colony, and NASA is celebrating its first manned mission to Mars thanks to the help of some autistic billionaire named Musk that nobody has heard of. The SR-71 was retired just a few years ago, with its replacement, capable of mach 5, making its first test flight this year. The cause of this divergent timeline is Dick Cheney falling down the stairs and breaking his neck in 1986.
@LordMephiston40k
@LordMephiston40k 5 ай бұрын
This gives me Ace Combat nostalgia
@scrubfire14
@scrubfire14 5 ай бұрын
F-16XL does exist in ace combat 7. One problem, that is locked behind a paywall, so that's that.
@RafaelGarcia-od5rb
@RafaelGarcia-od5rb 5 ай бұрын
Is that the ketsusjin Studio game? Ive been trying to find it but havent got a gripe of It so Far. Loved riding on the F86 at high speeds using WEP hehehehej
@hi-Larry-ous
@hi-Larry-ous 5 ай бұрын
​@@RafaelGarcia-od5rbno, ace combat is made by Bandai namco
@ThudBlue
@ThudBlue 5 ай бұрын
@@hi-Larry-ous And Project ACES
@gort8203
@gort8203 5 ай бұрын
SCAMP was original purpose of the XL, not multirole combat. You don't supercruise and maneuver at supersonic speed when lugging bombs under the wings. The emphasis on bombing came later when the design was repurposed and entered in the Enhanced Tactical Fighter competition, was was won by the F-15E. The video omits the fact that the XL didn't really achieve supercruise until it was later given a more powerful engine by NASA. It also doesn't mention that the XL was inferior to the production F-16 in subsonic high G maneuvering due to greater energy bleed.
@navneetkaur4763
@navneetkaur4763 5 ай бұрын
f16 in an oversized hoodie
@piotrd.4850
@piotrd.4850 5 ай бұрын
Oh, to see it come back, with Conformal Fuel Tanks, DSI air intake, GE engine with thrust vectoring and bl. 70 built and avionics, hardpoints rewired for SDBs / JAGMs.... and YF-16 vertical stabilizer for good measure.
@andrewszigeti2174
@andrewszigeti2174 5 ай бұрын
If the F-16XL had been built, it would have had to replace either the base F-16, or the F-15E. The budget wasn't there to do reasonable numbers of all three. You could have replaced the base F-16, but that would result in fewer total as due to the increased cost of the XL. You could have replaced the F-15E, but that would have been buying less capable airframes for the same cost., especially maintenance costs due to it being a third separate airframe. In the end, it was just more cost-effective to use a high/low procurement of F-15Es and F-16s.
@HYDRAdude
@HYDRAdude 5 ай бұрын
Wrong, it would be replacing the then recently retired F-111 actually.
@soulsphere9242
@soulsphere9242 5 ай бұрын
@@HYDRAdude It would have replaced the F-111, but the F-111 wasn't retired until the mid 90s.
@silaskuemmerle2505
@silaskuemmerle2505 4 ай бұрын
It would have replaced the F-111, and the F-15E would have never been built. That's how military competitions work.
@ReverseBasin
@ReverseBasin 5 ай бұрын
AMERICAN DORITO PLANE
@mig2five
@mig2five 5 ай бұрын
Doritos are just nachos with cheese🤨
@Cpt.SirSea
@Cpt.SirSea 5 ай бұрын
Idk what I'm doing
@WolfeSaber9933
@WolfeSaber9933 5 ай бұрын
That's the F-22 transformer
@oofman1911
@oofman1911 5 ай бұрын
​@@mig2fivethe superior version
@ronnies.channel
@ronnies.channel 4 ай бұрын
Yes!?!?😊
@ecleveland1
@ecleveland1 4 ай бұрын
People seldom realize just how good the F-14,F-15,F-16 & F-18 really are. All you have to do is look at all the different fighter designs leading up to the teen series designed in the 1970s. Then look at the new fighter designs after the teen series was adopted. There have been four completely different designs and only two of those have been adopted since the teen series came out in the 1970s, those are the F-22 & F-35. But we are still building new F-15, F-16 and F-18 fighters today roughly 50 years after their introduction. The designers really did an amazing job with the designs in the 1970s.
@shaider1982
@shaider1982 5 ай бұрын
1:45 they are the ones who hated missiles, forgetting that the new ones improved.
@MoskusMoskiferus1611
@MoskusMoskiferus1611 5 ай бұрын
"Strike Falcon"
@xaero76
@xaero76 4 ай бұрын
No... what happened is that the Phantom IIs were kicking butt! However.... after a friendly kill incident, the "Brass" ordered thereafter that all engagements must be in visual range.... and so, the Phantom that had no internal Gun had a major disadvantage since the Phantom II was pretty much designed as a middle boat designed for long range engagements.... not dog fighting.....
@BoltUpright190
@BoltUpright190 4 ай бұрын
You might wanna do your homework. The young man standing beside Hillaker in that photo is Andy Lewis, son of then General Dynamics CEO David Lewis. He's the only reason that the two XL airframes ever got built. The program was originally called SCAMP, a supersonic cruise aircraft that somehow got morphed into a bomb dump truck. The two XL aircraft had good sustained turn performance due to their low wing loading, but otherwise they were total pigs. The wings were GD's first large scale use of graphite-epoxy, and as such were VERY conservative in their design (the wing skins being over a inch thick at the root). When the first XL was rolled out of the north end of the factory for reporters, it promptly sat on it's tail once the tow bar was removed from the nose gear, it was THAT tail heavy. lol How do I know all this? I was there.
@wadelewis7252
@wadelewis7252 4 ай бұрын
Very cool. Let's chat. I was there in the Wing Design Group.
@BoltUpright190
@BoltUpright190 4 ай бұрын
@@wadelewis7252 Hi Wade, sorry to be so slow in responding. When were you there? I was there from 78 to 83.
@RedXlV
@RedXlV 4 ай бұрын
The problem with the F-16XL is that for purely the strike fighter role, the F-15E Strike Eagle was better. And for a multi-role fighter...it's a lot more expensive than the standard F-16.
@lightningwingdragon973
@lightningwingdragon973 5 ай бұрын
So apparently the Intrepid museum has been hiding an F-16?! Finally saw it when I went for the eclipse, and dang, it's adorably (and lethally) tiny.
@BlueTrane2028
@BlueTrane2028 5 ай бұрын
Did you get to Totality under clear skies? We ended up in Jackman, ME.
@virtual5448
@virtual5448 5 ай бұрын
@@BlueTrane2028 from how far off, what state
@BlueTrane2028
@BlueTrane2028 5 ай бұрын
@@virtual5448 I live just outside of Philadelphia, PA.
@virtual5448
@virtual5448 5 ай бұрын
@@BlueTrane2028 decently far from us then, long way to go for an eclipse, i went to houlton, its only about 3O minutes from me
@BlueTrane2028
@BlueTrane2028 5 ай бұрын
@@virtual5448 I’d go continents away if I could afford to. By distance we were 30 miles closer than 2017’s trip to Cookeville TN.
@kaylzshter6153
@kaylzshter6153 5 ай бұрын
This is one of my all time favorite 'what-if' fighters! I would love to see your take on the Lockheed Martin FB22, which is the ultimate 'I wish they built it' plane IMO!
@fridaycaliforniaa236
@fridaycaliforniaa236 5 ай бұрын
Along with the RAH-66 Comanche. Damn, I love this helicopter 🥰
@ReviveHF
@ReviveHF 5 ай бұрын
F-16XL is what the F-102 Delta Dagger, F-106 Delta Dart, F-104 Starfighter and F-4 Phantom supposed to be. However, the problem with the F-16XL is the intended role has been filled by F-15C and F-15EX, also the F-16V and the Navy counterpart F/A-18E/F can do the same ground strike missions at the same time carry air to air missiles for self defense. On the other hand, how to compete against Rafale in the international market is a big question.
@Gripen90
@Gripen90 5 ай бұрын
The F16XL lost out to the F15E Strike Eagle, that was the only reason. F15EX and Rafale were much later and never were contenders.
@silaskuemmerle2505
@silaskuemmerle2505 4 ай бұрын
The F-16XL was a contender for the Advanced Tactical Fighter (which the F-15E won because of upgradability) role not an interceptor and many of the technologies developed for it have found their way into newer F-16 variants
@saitekx69
@saitekx69 5 ай бұрын
F-16XL was definitely one of the great what if
@soulsphere9242
@soulsphere9242 5 ай бұрын
The F-16XL has nothing in common with the Eurocanards. The cranked arrow wing was designed for super-cruise, not for high manoeuvrability.
@TheMalootrager
@TheMalootrager 5 ай бұрын
F-16 eXceeding the Limit
@clivestainlesssteelwomble7665
@clivestainlesssteelwomble7665 5 ай бұрын
Wing planform is suspiciously akin to the genius SAAB Draken.
@topkitena
@topkitena 3 ай бұрын
It's a shameless copy
@AngelofCruelty
@AngelofCruelty 5 ай бұрын
The fact that the XL never went into production should have been a crime. :)
@Werry_Rang
@Werry_Rang 5 ай бұрын
Only if it was bit cheaper so it could compete with F-16 not F-15
@lightningmcqueen181
@lightningmcqueen181 5 ай бұрын
After I got to sit in the F16 as a kid when my did flew the BudLight MicroJet in the Airshows, I was hooked on it! It's still my favorite fighter... I'm surprised those new integrated Fuel Tanks don't affect the Performance of it
@howardroark7726
@howardroark7726 5 ай бұрын
The USAF may use the F16 for strike missions a lot but for many export customers it is their air superiority aircraft. Hillaker got it right the first time. The second version F16XL would have been great for its intended role too.
@ultralaggerREV1
@ultralaggerREV1 5 ай бұрын
6:31 I seriously love how those Alaskan F-16s are painted with the Russian liveries 😂
@PvtPartzz
@PvtPartzz 5 ай бұрын
Someone’s gotta be the opfor in exercises.
@Torth121
@Torth121 5 ай бұрын
Aggressor Squadron
@bozleybailey
@bozleybailey 5 ай бұрын
Thank you for the video, I read an article about these about 1990 or so and wondered why I never saw them again. It's no wonder they were outclassed by the f-15. Another mystery solved.
@TheGimpy117
@TheGimpy117 4 ай бұрын
the Super Phantom upgrade and the F-16XL are the alternate reality we never got.
@ADEPHN
@ADEPHN 2 ай бұрын
The choice between both of the jets was hard to think, they know than one will change forever plane designs and one will forever change strike capabilitys
@WaffleKite1
@WaffleKite1 5 ай бұрын
Didn’t know that the F16 got a child with the J35
@jerksundmark7776
@jerksundmark7776 5 ай бұрын
same profile as the Swedish J35 in the -60s. due to export regulations, the USA was not allowed to buy combat aircraft from Sweden then and tried the same profile on the F16 model.
@gold-818
@gold-818 5 ай бұрын
Yes my favorite jet from Ace Combat
@WasifAhmed-xj8qk
@WasifAhmed-xj8qk 5 ай бұрын
I love the f-16, it's a beauty
@joelellis7035
@joelellis7035 5 ай бұрын
Also, the XF-17 later became the F/A-18 for the Navy and it also used a bit of the "cranked wing" design.
@Torth121
@Torth121 5 ай бұрын
YF*
@fridaycaliforniaa236
@fridaycaliforniaa236 5 ай бұрын
This cranked wign design is perfect for high G maneuvers, because it helps the airflow to stick to the wings (because it creates vortices) =)
@Idahoguy10157
@Idahoguy10157 5 ай бұрын
The Air Force generals in charge are F-15 veterans. Who wanted the F-15E over the F-16XL. Had the air force ever ordered additional F-16’s the XL would likely have been produced
@katherineberger6329
@katherineberger6329 5 ай бұрын
The last tranche of F-16s ordered were delivered from 2006-2010. We got a LOT of Vipers, and relatively few Eagles. The XL was proposed to replace the F-111, a very large tactical bomber.
@soulsphere9242
@soulsphere9242 5 ай бұрын
The air force did order more F-16s, but they stuck to the standard design.
@soulsphere9242
@soulsphere9242 5 ай бұрын
@@katherineberger6329 Pretty sure the USAF got its last F-16s around 1997 (and the last of the F-15Es were around 2001). But yes, this was all long after the XL was canned.
@panthersherman453
@panthersherman453 5 ай бұрын
War Thunder Community: its not accurate enough here's some classified documents on the f16s wing specs to prove that I'm right
@nestorgonzalez2912
@nestorgonzalez2912 5 ай бұрын
I actually have a manual of the F-15
@EdwinHwuHacks4Science
@EdwinHwuHacks4Science 4 ай бұрын
F-16 Extra Large is my favorate plan of all time...truely appreciated that you made this great video! :D
@Yogasefski
@Yogasefski 5 ай бұрын
While I love the idea of the F-16XL, I wonder what would’ve happened to European aerospace if it was approved. Going by what happened with the F-100, F-104, and the F-4, we’ve might not’ve had such beautiful European designs.
@DocWolph
@DocWolph 5 ай бұрын
"We didn't lose. But we could have won bigger."
@firedog93551
@firedog93551 13 күн бұрын
I'm lucky enough to have seen this aircraft in real life.
@jmcfintona999
@jmcfintona999 14 күн бұрын
This is why the us military is so dominant in the air. In the competition they had the F5, F16 & F18 to choose from while having the F4 f15 & FF14 in operation. Meanwhile the rest of Europe can only afford to develop one fighter and when it arrived decades late it's obsolete or worse if it's not up to the job they have to suck it up and use it.
@petter5721
@petter5721 13 күн бұрын
The wing design from 1955 Swedish Draken. 60 years later US engineers copied the design 😂
@BorysMadrawski
@BorysMadrawski 4 ай бұрын
Over last 30 years, I still wonder why F-16XL had never been produced.
@skenzyme81
@skenzyme81 5 ай бұрын
F-16XL wasn't chosen because Air Force product selection isn't about buying either the best or most cost-effective aircraft, it's about that overpaid cushy executive job Boeing will offer you after their plane is chosen and you retire early.
@WolfeSaber9933
@WolfeSaber9933 5 ай бұрын
The F-15 wasn't designed by Boeing.
@StellarGryphon
@StellarGryphon 5 ай бұрын
Shut up
@SoloNit
@SoloNit 5 ай бұрын
F15E was design and made by McDonnell Douglas before the merge with Boeing.
@PasleyAviationPhotography
@PasleyAviationPhotography 5 ай бұрын
What a dumb-ass. The XL wasn't chosen because the F-15E, a McDonnell Douglas not Boeing offering was the better choice.
@Inspadave
@Inspadave 5 ай бұрын
The XL was not chosen because all it has over the Mudhen are looks, and even that is subjective.
@brand-194
@brand-194 5 ай бұрын
If should F-16Xl in production, a nice US Army joke would be: Send the "Delta Force".
@toastytoast6614
@toastytoast6614 5 ай бұрын
the editing gets better with every video
@ZephrusPrime
@ZephrusPrime 4 ай бұрын
They should call the F-16XL the Magnum.
@fiskmasadventures
@fiskmasadventures 4 ай бұрын
Not to be nitpicking, but I have to nitpick - at 11:35 ; the European 4th generation fighters did not follow the designed proved effective by the F-16XL, the delta and double delta wing had already been proven long before that (for example the Saab Draken first flew in 1955, and Saab Viggen first flew in 1967). Europe always liked the short takeoff/landing distances that the delta wing provided, even better with the canards. With that said, the F-16XL is a beautiful plane, and it's truly a shame it never got to be put in operational service.
@matthieuzglurg6015
@matthieuzglurg6015 5 ай бұрын
the Rafale, grippen and Eurofighter actually have straight delta wings, not cranked delta wings. They also all have Canards, which the F-16XL didn't have
@soulsphere9242
@soulsphere9242 5 ай бұрын
Yep. The design philosophy is completely different. The video is kind of trash.
@dannypipewrench533
@dannypipewrench533 5 ай бұрын
I have been waiting for a video on this aircraft. Thank you.
@McJiver
@McJiver 5 ай бұрын
When your country has air supremacy almost instantly in any conflict, you are going to need multirole fighters.
@merafirewing6591
@merafirewing6591 5 ай бұрын
Could the F-16XL be able to do the Cobra Maneuver?
@edutaimentcartoys
@edutaimentcartoys 4 ай бұрын
7:24 wow, nice footage
@donnibrasko1
@donnibrasko1 4 ай бұрын
Can we all just take a sec to appreciate the Nasa livery on F-16 XL!
@jrsharker23
@jrsharker23 4 ай бұрын
I love how many people in this comment section watched that one lazerpig video and now think they're aerospace engineering experts lol
@machinech183
@machinech183 4 ай бұрын
Yep, exactly that.
@JZsBFF
@JZsBFF 5 ай бұрын
F16 has an impressive track record but is it accurate to assume that the XL would have gone the same way?
@Handskemager
@Handskemager 5 ай бұрын
I like the look of the F-16XL however, the viper just looks completely menacing, ready to tear other planes apart. So I’m kinda glad we (Denmark) got the F-16
@ultralaggerREV1
@ultralaggerREV1 5 ай бұрын
What about F-36 Kingsnake? The supposed successor to the XL
@cjmanson5692
@cjmanson5692 5 ай бұрын
I've seen that exact F-16XL (the one at 11:07) as a static display on the apron at the 2022 Edwards AFB Airshow.
@retgi1
@retgi1 21 күн бұрын
A must read book "John Boyd Who Changed The Art Of War" explains in great detail how he changed the mindset and the way USAF thinks of flying and winning today.
@kadiwareyes4481
@kadiwareyes4481 18 күн бұрын
If that jet was bought by the air force it would render all the other jets insignificant. That's why they chose the inferior design so that there would be a high and low jet fighter bomber.
@Gunni1972
@Gunni1972 5 ай бұрын
What if: The F-15 would have gotten wings like that? Any aerodynamics engineers here?
@PhalanxFPV
@PhalanxFPV 5 ай бұрын
I love your channel but why u posting at 10PM (I speculate that not much people live in Australia and posting late will have positive view effects)
@FoundAndExplained
@FoundAndExplained 5 ай бұрын
Most of my audience is USA and Europe. So why not upload now, go to bed and wake up to 100k views (fingers crossed LOL)
@gabrielb9010
@gabrielb9010 5 ай бұрын
Long Story Short: Time Zones are B*****s
@medos9854
@medos9854 5 ай бұрын
In France it's 2PM perfect for dinner time. 😊
@krystianzyszczynski4115
@krystianzyszczynski4115 5 ай бұрын
It's 1537 where I'm at lol
@astigmatic8978
@astigmatic8978 5 ай бұрын
Live in Perth - came out at 8pm for me
@tomarmadiyer2698
@tomarmadiyer2698 5 ай бұрын
Ok now make it carry the aerogavin
@saiprateek5779
@saiprateek5779 5 ай бұрын
US Air force wanted F-16s.. The designers had half of DARPA funds.. just to create an F-16 based on Tejas Aircraft of India 😂😂😂
@Micha-qv5uf
@Micha-qv5uf 4 ай бұрын
Bro the F16 is 40 years older than the Tejas. Wth are you talking about?
@silaskuemmerle2505
@silaskuemmerle2505 4 ай бұрын
The F-16XL was designed and built in the early '80s, the HAL Tejas was designed in the '90s and built in the 2000s based on the Dassault Mirage series.
@EAFSQ9
@EAFSQ9 Ай бұрын
the F-16XL was designed in the late 1970s-1980s... Tejas didn't come into its form till 2008
@darrencorrigan8505
@darrencorrigan8505 4 ай бұрын
Thanks, Found & Explained. I need me some laserpig thinking.
@borissljukic1470
@borissljukic1470 4 ай бұрын
Each aircraft is defined by parameters such as wing/loading and thrust/weight. Someone is lying here. For a maximum engine power of 29,500 lbf and a mass of 48,000 lb, you cannot get anything other than a thrust/weight of 0.61, which means that the engine is too heavy and the rate of climb cannot be 62,000 ft/min but 27,604 ft/min. There is also mention of an engine upgrade to the regular F 16 that allows a rate of climb of 62,000 ft/min, but then the F 16XL would have a rate of climb of only 34,229 ft/min.
@bigblue6917
@bigblue6917 4 ай бұрын
You should take a look at the scimitar wing of the Handley Page Victor if you want an interestingly shaped wing
@cdyjv118
@cdyjv118 4 ай бұрын
The XL was cool but didn't have the range/payload/BFM/radar/higher G-limit as the Mudhen. The Strike was the right choice
@sohrabroozbahani4700
@sohrabroozbahani4700 5 ай бұрын
Strike Eagle is a beast of a strike craft, Viper is also a monster dogfighter in its own right, XL would have lost the rate fighting capability of the original Viper and then again fall short of a powerhouse like the Strike Eagle... XL faced the same problem Tiger shark faced in its own time, being a good design nobody really actually needed cause more familiar and accessible options were already present... For example since F35 is available for export many countries just go on and buy it, when they can't or denied, like Turkey for example then making one becomes an option, or the counterparts that Russia and China claim they have to offer as stand in versions, or F22 is not for export so Korea makes their own, but when they can buy they buy F15K, perhaps the best Strike Eagle out there... we will later see about the EX or SE...
@josemarianelsoncortez6725
@josemarianelsoncortez6725 Ай бұрын
(July 3, 1982).FIRST MAIDEN FLIGHT THE F16 ARROW CRANKED WING
@Zitoune1954
@Zitoune1954 4 ай бұрын
I think the french Mirage series were more famous compared to the Saab Bracken lol, these delta wing aurcraft were exported all over the world
@danieljennerman7549
@danieljennerman7549 5 ай бұрын
Both of the F-16XLs are at Edwards AFB's Flight Test Museum's on base air part.
@Tek-eo3li
@Tek-eo3li 5 ай бұрын
The AF really should have made all later F-16 blocks to be based on the XL.
@hilarybrown2271
@hilarybrown2271 5 ай бұрын
I love your videos also can you talk about orion nuclear pulse rocket not the space battleship the manned and cargo versions please
@TheJonititan
@TheJonititan 3 ай бұрын
For an improvement on this idea see the F-36 Kingsnake designed by the Hushkit blog.
@Freesavh1776
@Freesavh1776 5 ай бұрын
Honestly people, how do you think McDonald's got the "Super Size Me' idea. 😂😂😂 You gotta admit it, the F-16 XL is a great looking aircraft. Plus the F-16 has always been 1 of my favorite aircraft of all time. It turned out to be an outstanding platform that many countries realized & are still using.
@AEFisch
@AEFisch 5 ай бұрын
One of the failures to be built was a fly-off against the original F16 where it's air-air abilities showed it to be compromised. Plus the newest F16 added leading edge and additional integral fuel to its wings "borrowing" some of the XL advantages. Just look at a brand new F16, it's obvious
@Pokedee112
@Pokedee112 5 ай бұрын
Lazerpig come and save us
@jst1man
@jst1man 4 ай бұрын
The air force hardly ever justifies it's choice. It's stupid because there are always better options. Like the Yf22 and the yf23. The yf23 was the better choice, but the looks of the yf22 won. Trivia: the YF 22 has bellyflopped on the ground twice once before it went into production.
@FM-lj6xq
@FM-lj6xq 5 ай бұрын
I was hoping it came with a side of fries and a drink.
@richdurbin6146
@richdurbin6146 5 ай бұрын
I’d have thought new F-16 orders from the mid 80s forward it would’ve made sense to make those XLs.
@janusz4156
@janusz4156 5 ай бұрын
The star of Ace Combat series. 50 years of F-16 in 2024.
@William_1791
@William_1791 4 ай бұрын
This thing would have sold like hotcakes with the export market
@BlitzvogelMobius
@BlitzvogelMobius 3 ай бұрын
Ah the version of the F-16 that should've been built instead of the F-16C. Too many advantages over the Charlie despite the loss in maneuvering in certain flight regimes.
@fw1421
@fw1421 5 ай бұрын
The XL was a great plane,the Pentagon should have bought them.
@Poggle566
@Poggle566 4 ай бұрын
I remember this from N-Gen Racing.
@rocketpunchgo1
@rocketpunchgo1 5 ай бұрын
One of my all-time favorite X-planes.
@tranquilreverie203
@tranquilreverie203 5 ай бұрын
I'm curious as to why General Dynamics never sold this jet to foreign customers
Is this the best Soviet fighter jet ever made?
16:16
Found And Explained
Рет қаралды 152 М.
The Only Time In History That Water Was Safer Than Land
22:21
ExtinctZoo
Рет қаралды 2,6 МЛН
Please Help This Poor Boy 🙏
00:40
Alan Chikin Chow
Рет қаралды 11 МЛН
when you have plan B 😂
00:11
Andrey Grechka
Рет қаралды 66 МЛН
Пришёл к другу на ночёвку 😂
01:00
Cadrol&Fatich
Рет қаралды 11 МЛН
Why the Soviet answer to the F-16 failed - MiG 29 story
11:43
Found And Explained
Рет қаралды 1,6 МЛН
How US Military SMOKED Russian Mercenaries...
10:29
Brothers in Arms
Рет қаралды 7 МЛН
Not a Toy: World's Scariest Aircraft  | Last Moments
11:29
Qxir
Рет қаралды 3,6 МЛН
Live Fast, Die Young: The Story of the U.S. Navy's Hot-Rod F-16N
16:45
This Plane "doesn't exist" - SR-75 Penetrator
25:03
Found And Explained
Рет қаралды 559 М.
How Sweden made the best fighter jet - Saab 35 Draken
16:09
Found And Explained
Рет қаралды 299 М.
What happened to Land Submarines?
12:31
Found And Explained
Рет қаралды 1,3 МЛН
These Fly-bys Were Both Badass and Dangerous
12:22
Ward Carroll
Рет қаралды 777 М.
The best jet Britain ever made... and cancelled - TSR-2
17:20
Found And Explained
Рет қаралды 85 М.
The MYTH Of The "F-35"
11:20
Red Wrench Films
Рет қаралды 665 М.
Please Help This Poor Boy 🙏
00:40
Alan Chikin Chow
Рет қаралды 11 МЛН