Merch Store! www.foundandex... NEW CHANNEL: • Launched from the bigg... Discord: / discord My News Channel: / @aviationstationyt Join this channel to get access to perks: / @foundandexplained Patreon: / foundandexplained
Пікірлер: 644
@h.cedric81575 ай бұрын
*Pierre Sprey* : claims to have designed the F-16/15 *H.J. Hillaker* : "You're not that guy."
@Steve_Raglan_aka_William_Afton5 ай бұрын
Pierre Sprey actually claimed to designed the F-15 and F-35 but not the F-16
@croc-biteplays53375 ай бұрын
@@Steve_Raglan_aka_William_Afton no what till his death he hated the f35 not surprising as he cant wrap his head around anything
@sorrento1145 ай бұрын
“I’m that guy”
@abinodattil64224 ай бұрын
lol is that u amos
@Pokedee1123 ай бұрын
He also claimed he helped in building the A-10
@pickleboi55485 ай бұрын
When he said fighter mafia, the laserpig inside me woke up
@ansonellis4435 ай бұрын
Bro I feel you.
@justinkemp40194 ай бұрын
Me too, real engineer also made the same mistake
@felixknorpp28034 ай бұрын
It felt like Lazerpig was coming inside of me
@seyramamezah38154 ай бұрын
@@felixknorpp2803 pause. I understand what you mean. I agree but..... Pause
@katherineberger63295 ай бұрын
The Light Fighter Mafia (later rebranded itself the "Fighter Mafia" after the F-15 was a rousing success that combined high performance and heavy payload in one airframe) was far less influential than they want people to think in historical retrospect. They were right in broad strokes, but the way they were right is actually extremely trivial (and they were extremely guilty of pushing things like James Burton's horrifically flawed "Blitzfighter" concept that would have gotten every single man flying it killed - and no, Blitzfighter was not a "precursor" to the A-10 Warthog, it was an attempt to design a smaller, stripped-down, COMPLETELY VULNERABLE A-10 Warthog and it was laughed out of the room every time it was introduced). "A plane with high thrust and low weight will be a better dogfighter than a plane with moderate thrust and high weight"? NO FUCKING SHIT! The LFM wanted to take the things that made the F-16 a worthwhile fighter aircraft away from it, and leave it as a single-engine light fighter with a maximum capacity of four Sidewinders - and they didn't even really want the Sidewinders.
@mamarussellthepie39955 ай бұрын
Oof, lol Yeah
@pyronuke47685 ай бұрын
I'm half convinced the USAF went ahead with the LWF program just to get these guys to shut up.
@croc-biteplays53375 ай бұрын
yea like how do people still believe there shit
@croc-biteplays53375 ай бұрын
one of them wanted the f15 to carry all its fuel externaly and glide back to base
@katherineberger63295 ай бұрын
@@croc-biteplays5337 the F-16, honestly should have had a more capable radar and more fuel from the outset. The viper has to sortie with bags for just about everything, and that’s a problem.
@Jun-o3l6t5 ай бұрын
Pierre sprey and the fighter mafia being given any credit is a massive red flag to the validity of anything said in this video tbh They were horrible designers with wrong predictions, Sprey wasnt even a designer he was a jazz label producer who lied to gain fame with his ludicrous claims
@gort82035 ай бұрын
Sprey was a scammer who was eventually proved wrong. Even though the Gulf War proved him and his fellow travelers in the liberal media wrong, he tried to point to that war as proof of what he had advocated. That's hutzpah. It's amazing anyone listened to him, and that was only due to his skill at self-promotion.
@katherineberger63293 ай бұрын
Sprey was there to help the LFM on the publicity front. He wasn't an aviation engineer, but he knew how to sell product.
@pyronuke47685 ай бұрын
I find it funny that Hillaker was the only member of the Fighter Mafia who was actually qualified to design a plane, and he tends to be among the lesser known members due to being one of the more reserved ones and even began to distance himself from the group in later years, wich I think speaks volumes.
@Spaceman201505 ай бұрын
The fighter maffia where not good designers They also said that these things are useless: radar, radio, advanced sensors, missiles and other things that are crucial in today’s air to air landscape
@Willtabixx5 ай бұрын
Didnt they also try and use civilian handheld radios for communication?
@baguette21175 ай бұрын
What do you mean? How could early World War 2 air doctrine be outdated???
@Spaceman201505 ай бұрын
@@Willtabixx they wanted no radio at all I believe Only after pressure from the usaf did they add a radio
@pseudotasuki5 ай бұрын
Literally stopped watching when Pierre Sprey's photo popped up.
@Chilly_Billy5 ай бұрын
@pseudotasuki 🤣 Glad I'm not alone.
@Willtabixx5 ай бұрын
Pierre sprey was NOT an aviation engineer. He was a record producer, do research
@Spaceman201505 ай бұрын
Finally someone who understands
@M18Hellcat-175 ай бұрын
The whole fighter mafia is a load of shit.
@Willtabixx5 ай бұрын
@@M18Hellcat-17 agreed
@Willtabixx5 ай бұрын
@@Spaceman20150 well of course, I actually did my own research and watched laserpig
@Spaceman201505 ай бұрын
@@Willtabixx yeah The fighter maffia was conplete bullshit and if they got their way the f16 would NOT look like it does now
@khoatran-sv7je5 ай бұрын
Still sad to see the blasphemy of Fighter Mafia being spread around, I've lost all respect for Pierre Spray. And regarding the F16XL, regarding how much of a significant improvement it was in all aspects, from weaponry, range, payload, fuel economy, etc; the air force really should've kept the F16XL. Would've opened up so many options for it today.
@blairscartoonshistory74775 ай бұрын
Funny how the Fighter mafia claims to hate missiles while they claim to build aircraft with lots of missiles on them
@lim-kun5 ай бұрын
Ahh the falcon dorito *Wizard squadron flashbacks*
@Neteboy20205 ай бұрын
@m.sydneyvern22605 ай бұрын
@Arrow_1185 ай бұрын
"No rules in a dogfight. You just have to take the enemy down."
@ThudBlue5 ай бұрын
PJ : "Target Acquired. There's Four of Them!. They Approaching on The Front"
@Daniel944844 ай бұрын
@Iskelderon5 ай бұрын
Nice thing about the 16 being a cheap parts collection and modular from the start is that it can also serve as the basis for a shitload of experiments, hence why NASA loves them as a starting point.
@MaDmanEXE5 ай бұрын
This is why we have LazerPig on speed dial.
@zee_terminator28505 ай бұрын
So he can say incorrect things and call people names?
@Sveta75 ай бұрын
@@zee_terminator2850And be a pig?
@zee_terminator28505 ай бұрын
@@Sveta7 i mean thats just by the nature of his stupidity
@Evolution_Kills5 ай бұрын
@@zee_terminator2850 Oh no, show us where on the T-14 the bad Scotsman touched you...
@alessandrozampa66425 ай бұрын
oh boy oh boy he did not just say engineers and fighter mafia in the same sentence
@WolfeSaber99335 ай бұрын
The rumored F-36 Kingsnake makes use of a wing similar to the F-16XL.
@katherineberger63295 ай бұрын
Let's call it what it is: Fantasized. Not "rumored." The F-16 and F-35 are both built by Lockheed Martin. There is NO REALISTIC WAY that LM is going to offer air forces a product that internally competes with their own flagship aircraft.
@tripwire39925 ай бұрын
@@katherineberger6329the UK could do with f16's. The eurofighter aint that good imma be real
@WolfeSaber99335 ай бұрын
@@katherineberger6329 Then why are they in the competition for the NGAD program? A program that will replace their flagships.
@TylerSmithMusic15 ай бұрын
@@katherineberger6329there is more than one role needing played by aircraft. It isn’t one that rules them all.
@tatthangnguyenxuan96215 ай бұрын
The USAF has no need for a jet like that to replace the F16
@Swindle198420 күн бұрын
It is the year 2024, in an alternate timeline. The US air force has a fleet of 1,000 F-16XL's, 500 F-15EX's, 750 F-22A's, 250 FB-22's, 100 B1R's, 20 B-2's, and is currently upgrading its fleet of B-52's and acquiring the B-21. A replacement for the A-10 is undergoing testing, being basically the same design but improved in every way, such as upgrading to a 40mm gun based on the polymer-cased, telescoped ammo for the UK's Ajax vehicle for maximum firepower. The F-35 was canceled due to being a moneypit that didn't work as advertised. The US navy has a fleet of F/A-18's, but instead of the Super Hornet, they have a fleet of Super Attack 21 Tomcats and a naval derivative of the F-22. The Marines have their Hornets and a fleet of new-build Harriers upgraded with modern technology derived from other fighter jets, including the canceled F-35, to the point it barely resembles the original aircraft except for its mission role and VTOL capabilities. US air power reigns supreme. The space shuttle was retired and replaced with a new, modern design more in line with the original NASA design rather than the cludged one the air force forced on them before ditching the project, NERVA rockets are lifting massive payloads into orbit on a monthly basis, there is a permanent base on the moon, construction has begun on the first O'Neill Island 3 space colony, and NASA is celebrating its first manned mission to Mars thanks to the help of some autistic billionaire named Musk that nobody has heard of. The SR-71 was retired just a few years ago, with its replacement, capable of mach 5, making its first test flight this year. The cause of this divergent timeline is Dick Cheney falling down the stairs and breaking his neck in 1986.
@LordMephiston40k5 ай бұрын
This gives me Ace Combat nostalgia
@scrubfire145 ай бұрын
F-16XL does exist in ace combat 7. One problem, that is locked behind a paywall, so that's that.
@RafaelGarcia-od5rb5 ай бұрын
Is that the ketsusjin Studio game? Ive been trying to find it but havent got a gripe of It so Far. Loved riding on the F86 at high speeds using WEP hehehehej
@hi-Larry-ous5 ай бұрын
@@RafaelGarcia-od5rbno, ace combat is made by Bandai namco
@ThudBlue5 ай бұрын
@@hi-Larry-ous And Project ACES
@gort82035 ай бұрын
SCAMP was original purpose of the XL, not multirole combat. You don't supercruise and maneuver at supersonic speed when lugging bombs under the wings. The emphasis on bombing came later when the design was repurposed and entered in the Enhanced Tactical Fighter competition, was was won by the F-15E. The video omits the fact that the XL didn't really achieve supercruise until it was later given a more powerful engine by NASA. It also doesn't mention that the XL was inferior to the production F-16 in subsonic high G maneuvering due to greater energy bleed.
@navneetkaur47635 ай бұрын
f16 in an oversized hoodie
@piotrd.48505 ай бұрын
Oh, to see it come back, with Conformal Fuel Tanks, DSI air intake, GE engine with thrust vectoring and bl. 70 built and avionics, hardpoints rewired for SDBs / JAGMs.... and YF-16 vertical stabilizer for good measure.
@andrewszigeti21745 ай бұрын
If the F-16XL had been built, it would have had to replace either the base F-16, or the F-15E. The budget wasn't there to do reasonable numbers of all three. You could have replaced the base F-16, but that would result in fewer total as due to the increased cost of the XL. You could have replaced the F-15E, but that would have been buying less capable airframes for the same cost., especially maintenance costs due to it being a third separate airframe. In the end, it was just more cost-effective to use a high/low procurement of F-15Es and F-16s.
@HYDRAdude5 ай бұрын
Wrong, it would be replacing the then recently retired F-111 actually.
@soulsphere92425 ай бұрын
@@HYDRAdude It would have replaced the F-111, but the F-111 wasn't retired until the mid 90s.
@silaskuemmerle25054 ай бұрын
It would have replaced the F-111, and the F-15E would have never been built. That's how military competitions work.
@ReverseBasin5 ай бұрын
AMERICAN DORITO PLANE
@mig2five5 ай бұрын
Doritos are just nachos with cheese🤨
@Cpt.SirSea5 ай бұрын
Idk what I'm doing
@WolfeSaber99335 ай бұрын
That's the F-22 transformer
@oofman19115 ай бұрын
@@mig2fivethe superior version
@ronnies.channel4 ай бұрын
Yes!?!?😊
@ecleveland14 ай бұрын
People seldom realize just how good the F-14,F-15,F-16 & F-18 really are. All you have to do is look at all the different fighter designs leading up to the teen series designed in the 1970s. Then look at the new fighter designs after the teen series was adopted. There have been four completely different designs and only two of those have been adopted since the teen series came out in the 1970s, those are the F-22 & F-35. But we are still building new F-15, F-16 and F-18 fighters today roughly 50 years after their introduction. The designers really did an amazing job with the designs in the 1970s.
@shaider19825 ай бұрын
1:45 they are the ones who hated missiles, forgetting that the new ones improved.
@MoskusMoskiferus16115 ай бұрын
"Strike Falcon"
@xaero764 ай бұрын
No... what happened is that the Phantom IIs were kicking butt! However.... after a friendly kill incident, the "Brass" ordered thereafter that all engagements must be in visual range.... and so, the Phantom that had no internal Gun had a major disadvantage since the Phantom II was pretty much designed as a middle boat designed for long range engagements.... not dog fighting.....
@BoltUpright1904 ай бұрын
You might wanna do your homework. The young man standing beside Hillaker in that photo is Andy Lewis, son of then General Dynamics CEO David Lewis. He's the only reason that the two XL airframes ever got built. The program was originally called SCAMP, a supersonic cruise aircraft that somehow got morphed into a bomb dump truck. The two XL aircraft had good sustained turn performance due to their low wing loading, but otherwise they were total pigs. The wings were GD's first large scale use of graphite-epoxy, and as such were VERY conservative in their design (the wing skins being over a inch thick at the root). When the first XL was rolled out of the north end of the factory for reporters, it promptly sat on it's tail once the tow bar was removed from the nose gear, it was THAT tail heavy. lol How do I know all this? I was there.
@wadelewis72524 ай бұрын
Very cool. Let's chat. I was there in the Wing Design Group.
@BoltUpright1904 ай бұрын
@@wadelewis7252 Hi Wade, sorry to be so slow in responding. When were you there? I was there from 78 to 83.
@RedXlV4 ай бұрын
The problem with the F-16XL is that for purely the strike fighter role, the F-15E Strike Eagle was better. And for a multi-role fighter...it's a lot more expensive than the standard F-16.
@lightningwingdragon9735 ай бұрын
So apparently the Intrepid museum has been hiding an F-16?! Finally saw it when I went for the eclipse, and dang, it's adorably (and lethally) tiny.
@BlueTrane20285 ай бұрын
Did you get to Totality under clear skies? We ended up in Jackman, ME.
@virtual54485 ай бұрын
@@BlueTrane2028 from how far off, what state
@BlueTrane20285 ай бұрын
@@virtual5448 I live just outside of Philadelphia, PA.
@virtual54485 ай бұрын
@@BlueTrane2028 decently far from us then, long way to go for an eclipse, i went to houlton, its only about 3O minutes from me
@BlueTrane20285 ай бұрын
@@virtual5448 I’d go continents away if I could afford to. By distance we were 30 miles closer than 2017’s trip to Cookeville TN.
@kaylzshter61535 ай бұрын
This is one of my all time favorite 'what-if' fighters! I would love to see your take on the Lockheed Martin FB22, which is the ultimate 'I wish they built it' plane IMO!
@fridaycaliforniaa2365 ай бұрын
Along with the RAH-66 Comanche. Damn, I love this helicopter 🥰
@ReviveHF5 ай бұрын
F-16XL is what the F-102 Delta Dagger, F-106 Delta Dart, F-104 Starfighter and F-4 Phantom supposed to be. However, the problem with the F-16XL is the intended role has been filled by F-15C and F-15EX, also the F-16V and the Navy counterpart F/A-18E/F can do the same ground strike missions at the same time carry air to air missiles for self defense. On the other hand, how to compete against Rafale in the international market is a big question.
@Gripen905 ай бұрын
The F16XL lost out to the F15E Strike Eagle, that was the only reason. F15EX and Rafale were much later and never were contenders.
@silaskuemmerle25054 ай бұрын
The F-16XL was a contender for the Advanced Tactical Fighter (which the F-15E won because of upgradability) role not an interceptor and many of the technologies developed for it have found their way into newer F-16 variants
@saitekx695 ай бұрын
F-16XL was definitely one of the great what if
@soulsphere92425 ай бұрын
The F-16XL has nothing in common with the Eurocanards. The cranked arrow wing was designed for super-cruise, not for high manoeuvrability.
@TheMalootrager5 ай бұрын
F-16 eXceeding the Limit
@clivestainlesssteelwomble76655 ай бұрын
Wing planform is suspiciously akin to the genius SAAB Draken.
@topkitena3 ай бұрын
It's a shameless copy
@AngelofCruelty5 ай бұрын
The fact that the XL never went into production should have been a crime. :)
@Werry_Rang5 ай бұрын
Only if it was bit cheaper so it could compete with F-16 not F-15
@lightningmcqueen1815 ай бұрын
After I got to sit in the F16 as a kid when my did flew the BudLight MicroJet in the Airshows, I was hooked on it! It's still my favorite fighter... I'm surprised those new integrated Fuel Tanks don't affect the Performance of it
@howardroark77265 ай бұрын
The USAF may use the F16 for strike missions a lot but for many export customers it is their air superiority aircraft. Hillaker got it right the first time. The second version F16XL would have been great for its intended role too.
@ultralaggerREV15 ай бұрын
6:31 I seriously love how those Alaskan F-16s are painted with the Russian liveries 😂
@PvtPartzz5 ай бұрын
Someone’s gotta be the opfor in exercises.
@Torth1215 ай бұрын
Aggressor Squadron
@bozleybailey5 ай бұрын
Thank you for the video, I read an article about these about 1990 or so and wondered why I never saw them again. It's no wonder they were outclassed by the f-15. Another mystery solved.
@TheGimpy1174 ай бұрын
the Super Phantom upgrade and the F-16XL are the alternate reality we never got.
@ADEPHN2 ай бұрын
The choice between both of the jets was hard to think, they know than one will change forever plane designs and one will forever change strike capabilitys
@WaffleKite15 ай бұрын
Didn’t know that the F16 got a child with the J35
@jerksundmark77765 ай бұрын
same profile as the Swedish J35 in the -60s. due to export regulations, the USA was not allowed to buy combat aircraft from Sweden then and tried the same profile on the F16 model.
@gold-8185 ай бұрын
Yes my favorite jet from Ace Combat
@WasifAhmed-xj8qk5 ай бұрын
I love the f-16, it's a beauty
@joelellis70355 ай бұрын
Also, the XF-17 later became the F/A-18 for the Navy and it also used a bit of the "cranked wing" design.
@Torth1215 ай бұрын
YF*
@fridaycaliforniaa2365 ай бұрын
This cranked wign design is perfect for high G maneuvers, because it helps the airflow to stick to the wings (because it creates vortices) =)
@Idahoguy101575 ай бұрын
The Air Force generals in charge are F-15 veterans. Who wanted the F-15E over the F-16XL. Had the air force ever ordered additional F-16’s the XL would likely have been produced
@katherineberger63295 ай бұрын
The last tranche of F-16s ordered were delivered from 2006-2010. We got a LOT of Vipers, and relatively few Eagles. The XL was proposed to replace the F-111, a very large tactical bomber.
@soulsphere92425 ай бұрын
The air force did order more F-16s, but they stuck to the standard design.
@soulsphere92425 ай бұрын
@@katherineberger6329 Pretty sure the USAF got its last F-16s around 1997 (and the last of the F-15Es were around 2001). But yes, this was all long after the XL was canned.
@panthersherman4535 ай бұрын
War Thunder Community: its not accurate enough here's some classified documents on the f16s wing specs to prove that I'm right
@nestorgonzalez29125 ай бұрын
I actually have a manual of the F-15
@EdwinHwuHacks4Science4 ай бұрын
F-16 Extra Large is my favorate plan of all time...truely appreciated that you made this great video! :D
@Yogasefski5 ай бұрын
While I love the idea of the F-16XL, I wonder what would’ve happened to European aerospace if it was approved. Going by what happened with the F-100, F-104, and the F-4, we’ve might not’ve had such beautiful European designs.
@DocWolph5 ай бұрын
"We didn't lose. But we could have won bigger."
@firedog9355113 күн бұрын
I'm lucky enough to have seen this aircraft in real life.
@jmcfintona99914 күн бұрын
This is why the us military is so dominant in the air. In the competition they had the F5, F16 & F18 to choose from while having the F4 f15 & FF14 in operation. Meanwhile the rest of Europe can only afford to develop one fighter and when it arrived decades late it's obsolete or worse if it's not up to the job they have to suck it up and use it.
@petter572113 күн бұрын
The wing design from 1955 Swedish Draken. 60 years later US engineers copied the design 😂
@BorysMadrawski4 ай бұрын
Over last 30 years, I still wonder why F-16XL had never been produced.
@skenzyme815 ай бұрын
F-16XL wasn't chosen because Air Force product selection isn't about buying either the best or most cost-effective aircraft, it's about that overpaid cushy executive job Boeing will offer you after their plane is chosen and you retire early.
@WolfeSaber99335 ай бұрын
The F-15 wasn't designed by Boeing.
@StellarGryphon5 ай бұрын
Shut up
@SoloNit5 ай бұрын
F15E was design and made by McDonnell Douglas before the merge with Boeing.
@PasleyAviationPhotography5 ай бұрын
What a dumb-ass. The XL wasn't chosen because the F-15E, a McDonnell Douglas not Boeing offering was the better choice.
@Inspadave5 ай бұрын
The XL was not chosen because all it has over the Mudhen are looks, and even that is subjective.
@brand-1945 ай бұрын
If should F-16Xl in production, a nice US Army joke would be: Send the "Delta Force".
@toastytoast66145 ай бұрын
the editing gets better with every video
@ZephrusPrime4 ай бұрын
They should call the F-16XL the Magnum.
@fiskmasadventures4 ай бұрын
Not to be nitpicking, but I have to nitpick - at 11:35 ; the European 4th generation fighters did not follow the designed proved effective by the F-16XL, the delta and double delta wing had already been proven long before that (for example the Saab Draken first flew in 1955, and Saab Viggen first flew in 1967). Europe always liked the short takeoff/landing distances that the delta wing provided, even better with the canards. With that said, the F-16XL is a beautiful plane, and it's truly a shame it never got to be put in operational service.
@matthieuzglurg60155 ай бұрын
the Rafale, grippen and Eurofighter actually have straight delta wings, not cranked delta wings. They also all have Canards, which the F-16XL didn't have
@soulsphere92425 ай бұрын
Yep. The design philosophy is completely different. The video is kind of trash.
@dannypipewrench5335 ай бұрын
I have been waiting for a video on this aircraft. Thank you.
@McJiver5 ай бұрын
When your country has air supremacy almost instantly in any conflict, you are going to need multirole fighters.
@merafirewing65915 ай бұрын
Could the F-16XL be able to do the Cobra Maneuver?
@edutaimentcartoys4 ай бұрын
7:24 wow, nice footage
@donnibrasko14 ай бұрын
Can we all just take a sec to appreciate the Nasa livery on F-16 XL!
@jrsharker234 ай бұрын
I love how many people in this comment section watched that one lazerpig video and now think they're aerospace engineering experts lol
@machinech1834 ай бұрын
Yep, exactly that.
@JZsBFF5 ай бұрын
F16 has an impressive track record but is it accurate to assume that the XL would have gone the same way?
@Handskemager5 ай бұрын
I like the look of the F-16XL however, the viper just looks completely menacing, ready to tear other planes apart. So I’m kinda glad we (Denmark) got the F-16
@ultralaggerREV15 ай бұрын
What about F-36 Kingsnake? The supposed successor to the XL
@cjmanson56925 ай бұрын
I've seen that exact F-16XL (the one at 11:07) as a static display on the apron at the 2022 Edwards AFB Airshow.
@retgi121 күн бұрын
A must read book "John Boyd Who Changed The Art Of War" explains in great detail how he changed the mindset and the way USAF thinks of flying and winning today.
@kadiwareyes448118 күн бұрын
If that jet was bought by the air force it would render all the other jets insignificant. That's why they chose the inferior design so that there would be a high and low jet fighter bomber.
@Gunni19725 ай бұрын
What if: The F-15 would have gotten wings like that? Any aerodynamics engineers here?
@PhalanxFPV5 ай бұрын
I love your channel but why u posting at 10PM (I speculate that not much people live in Australia and posting late will have positive view effects)
@FoundAndExplained5 ай бұрын
Most of my audience is USA and Europe. So why not upload now, go to bed and wake up to 100k views (fingers crossed LOL)
@gabrielb90105 ай бұрын
Long Story Short: Time Zones are B*****s
@medos98545 ай бұрын
In France it's 2PM perfect for dinner time. 😊
@krystianzyszczynski41155 ай бұрын
It's 1537 where I'm at lol
@astigmatic89785 ай бұрын
Live in Perth - came out at 8pm for me
@tomarmadiyer26985 ай бұрын
Ok now make it carry the aerogavin
@saiprateek57795 ай бұрын
US Air force wanted F-16s.. The designers had half of DARPA funds.. just to create an F-16 based on Tejas Aircraft of India 😂😂😂
@Micha-qv5uf4 ай бұрын
Bro the F16 is 40 years older than the Tejas. Wth are you talking about?
@silaskuemmerle25054 ай бұрын
The F-16XL was designed and built in the early '80s, the HAL Tejas was designed in the '90s and built in the 2000s based on the Dassault Mirage series.
@EAFSQ9Ай бұрын
the F-16XL was designed in the late 1970s-1980s... Tejas didn't come into its form till 2008
@darrencorrigan85054 ай бұрын
Thanks, Found & Explained. I need me some laserpig thinking.
@borissljukic14704 ай бұрын
Each aircraft is defined by parameters such as wing/loading and thrust/weight. Someone is lying here. For a maximum engine power of 29,500 lbf and a mass of 48,000 lb, you cannot get anything other than a thrust/weight of 0.61, which means that the engine is too heavy and the rate of climb cannot be 62,000 ft/min but 27,604 ft/min. There is also mention of an engine upgrade to the regular F 16 that allows a rate of climb of 62,000 ft/min, but then the F 16XL would have a rate of climb of only 34,229 ft/min.
@bigblue69174 ай бұрын
You should take a look at the scimitar wing of the Handley Page Victor if you want an interestingly shaped wing
@cdyjv1184 ай бұрын
The XL was cool but didn't have the range/payload/BFM/radar/higher G-limit as the Mudhen. The Strike was the right choice
@sohrabroozbahani47005 ай бұрын
Strike Eagle is a beast of a strike craft, Viper is also a monster dogfighter in its own right, XL would have lost the rate fighting capability of the original Viper and then again fall short of a powerhouse like the Strike Eagle... XL faced the same problem Tiger shark faced in its own time, being a good design nobody really actually needed cause more familiar and accessible options were already present... For example since F35 is available for export many countries just go on and buy it, when they can't or denied, like Turkey for example then making one becomes an option, or the counterparts that Russia and China claim they have to offer as stand in versions, or F22 is not for export so Korea makes their own, but when they can buy they buy F15K, perhaps the best Strike Eagle out there... we will later see about the EX or SE...
@josemarianelsoncortez6725Ай бұрын
(July 3, 1982).FIRST MAIDEN FLIGHT THE F16 ARROW CRANKED WING
@Zitoune19544 ай бұрын
I think the french Mirage series were more famous compared to the Saab Bracken lol, these delta wing aurcraft were exported all over the world
@danieljennerman75495 ай бұрын
Both of the F-16XLs are at Edwards AFB's Flight Test Museum's on base air part.
@Tek-eo3li5 ай бұрын
The AF really should have made all later F-16 blocks to be based on the XL.
@hilarybrown22715 ай бұрын
I love your videos also can you talk about orion nuclear pulse rocket not the space battleship the manned and cargo versions please
@TheJonititan3 ай бұрын
For an improvement on this idea see the F-36 Kingsnake designed by the Hushkit blog.
@Freesavh17765 ай бұрын
Honestly people, how do you think McDonald's got the "Super Size Me' idea. 😂😂😂 You gotta admit it, the F-16 XL is a great looking aircraft. Plus the F-16 has always been 1 of my favorite aircraft of all time. It turned out to be an outstanding platform that many countries realized & are still using.
@AEFisch5 ай бұрын
One of the failures to be built was a fly-off against the original F16 where it's air-air abilities showed it to be compromised. Plus the newest F16 added leading edge and additional integral fuel to its wings "borrowing" some of the XL advantages. Just look at a brand new F16, it's obvious
@Pokedee1125 ай бұрын
Lazerpig come and save us
@jst1man4 ай бұрын
The air force hardly ever justifies it's choice. It's stupid because there are always better options. Like the Yf22 and the yf23. The yf23 was the better choice, but the looks of the yf22 won. Trivia: the YF 22 has bellyflopped on the ground twice once before it went into production.
@FM-lj6xq5 ай бұрын
I was hoping it came with a side of fries and a drink.
@richdurbin61465 ай бұрын
I’d have thought new F-16 orders from the mid 80s forward it would’ve made sense to make those XLs.
@janusz41565 ай бұрын
The star of Ace Combat series. 50 years of F-16 in 2024.
@William_17914 ай бұрын
This thing would have sold like hotcakes with the export market
@BlitzvogelMobius3 ай бұрын
Ah the version of the F-16 that should've been built instead of the F-16C. Too many advantages over the Charlie despite the loss in maneuvering in certain flight regimes.
@fw14215 ай бұрын
The XL was a great plane,the Pentagon should have bought them.
@Poggle5664 ай бұрын
I remember this from N-Gen Racing.
@rocketpunchgo15 ай бұрын
One of my all-time favorite X-planes.
@tranquilreverie2035 ай бұрын
I'm curious as to why General Dynamics never sold this jet to foreign customers