Ghanaian we have to celebrate our only Tsatsu we should not wait until something else happened before we start saying all the good things about him thank you.
@@ManaseSatsi I just want to have the opportunity to hear him speak and watch him physically..I just admire his decorum and dipomacy
@richarddenanyoh882811 сағат бұрын
Tsatu is very poweful minded, The leading Lawyer in Ghana
@patricksenoo159315 сағат бұрын
Mr Blay you go explain tyre 😂😂😂
@brayaw9655Сағат бұрын
😂
@danielarthur310917 сағат бұрын
Mr Tsatsu is beautifully smiling 😃 😊
@slimfbiggyansah429544 минут бұрын
Bcos when someone spewing nonsense and he knows he's you can only laugh.
@kyerereuben914717 сағат бұрын
please if you are hosting Lawyer Tsatsu , host him togther with someone who is also as good as him , please we need that critical thinking education here
@KofiPrince-n9b14 сағат бұрын
I think you lack understanding too. An intention to do something in the future cannot be punished now as per the judgement of the SC. Politics is making all NDC lawyers not accept the fact Mr. Blay is saying. The Supreme Court is the only body which can interpret Laws in Ghana and they did exactly that. If the affected MPs are accepted back, it means what the lawyers speaking for the SC judgement is true
@InsiderOpinion13 сағат бұрын
@@KofiPrince-n9bYour logical reasoning is so low.
@shelterdziko458713 сағат бұрын
So you are saying that they can still represent their party till election, ryt. Even so they can go for meetings and take decision on behalf of the party until election. Is that what you are saying. In case your wife or girlfriend decide to divorce or leave you, you will still allow her to stay in your house and go sleep with her new husband to be or boyfriend. Even so you will allow her to cook for you, right. an@@KofiPrince-n9b
@Offer1013 сағат бұрын
Kofi we are discussing law not morality . It’s what the constitution is saying not what we think should be
@theodoreagadzi955812 сағат бұрын
Kofi Prince, This is common logic OK. Can you answer why people were held accountable for conspiracy? Because conspiracy is also a future action, it does not exist, but when police deduced that your thoughts for the future would breach any law or peace, the police quickly change you to court for conspiracy to cause a crime even though you haven't cause any crime at the time. Your thoughts are futuristic.
@isaacdanquah627914 сағат бұрын
Defending the indefensible can make you look stupid irrespective of your status, age and many others.
@razakamidu550311 сағат бұрын
What is this man Blay saying i don’t understand him at all
@bernardkesse62558 сағат бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂
@DominicZakariaСағат бұрын
Honestly I don't also understand him😂😂😂
@henrytetteon22187 сағат бұрын
Tsatsu Tsikata is the Chief Justice Ghana never Had. he would have transformed the the Judiciary to reflect its mandate and mission. Tastsu you are legend, Colossus and a Great Man. God Bless You!!!!
@AbdoulatifBilal11 сағат бұрын
God bless you honorable legendary legal luminary,we the local and ordinary Ghanaian citizens understood everything,from this simple examples
@EddieEddies-ig5uz3 сағат бұрын
Oh God, please make Tsatsu an immortal. He should never die. His brain is too sharp, critical and important to this country. We need him to live forever. Tsatsu makes sooooooo much sense whenever he is talking law.
@aharon-mawu-wienipaanauel-liza12 сағат бұрын
Who else wants a match up between Tsatsu and Gertrude Torkonu the Chief Justice
@SebastianAstom11 сағат бұрын
i do ooo
@torgbekormla_deka10 сағат бұрын
☝️☝️☝️☝️☝️☝️
@homegardeninguk9 сағат бұрын
😂😂 you guys no watch the election petition ong. She was at the receiving end of most of his lectures
@raphaelbunwere28057 сағат бұрын
She won't come anka wagyimi kraa.😂😂 Getrude is Tsatsu student know that for a fact
@hetty78917 сағат бұрын
👌🏾
@Theravinerabbitry14 сағат бұрын
A person goes through vetting to be accepted by the party before submitting your documents to the EC, at the vetting you're supposed to be a member of that party for a period before allowed to run on the ticket of the party, again if you hold allegiance to any other party, so, when did he denounced his first party to now be on the polling pool of the next parliament ????
@fabianyaodoh497312 сағат бұрын
This is what they're not getting.
@Robert-d9k1k7 сағат бұрын
What i dont understand wit this current NPP group is their own constitution says it all and there dat was why they removed the suhum parliamentary candidate from the WhatsApp group
@futureringer82718 сағат бұрын
An important question to clear this confusion is that, what will happen when an MP who was voted to parliament as an independent candidate decides in 2 months into the 4 year term that he has joined a political party in the current parliament but will not contest any elections in the future? Will the MP remain in parliament for the entire 4 years or vacate his seat?
@paularkoh30084 сағат бұрын
If you read the ruling, it says an independent candidate at any point in time cannot join any political party in the current parliament. I guess your confusion is with Isaac Asiamah. He is not a member of Npp in Parliament. He is doing business with them but not as a member of NPP officially
@abubakariamadu32913 сағат бұрын
hmmmmm
@futureringer82712 сағат бұрын
@ I am making a general discussion not referring to NPP. The same thing applies to both independent and party MPs since the argument is that their decision only applies to future parliament. So what if the said MPs decide not to compete in future elections?
@Charles-zz5bt7 сағат бұрын
Whoever made this arrangements of panels must be arrested immediately 😅😅😅. What's that?? Why put Mr Blay on such a hot seat?
@mikesalvia61665 сағат бұрын
U just spoke my mind…ayikoe ottoo would have been much better
@tualangfrancis11 сағат бұрын
Mr.Blay got it all wrong after thinking that old age is automatic wisdom
@rasfiddo440515 сағат бұрын
Why do you pair Tsatsu with Blay?? TV3 never repeat this NONSENSE AGAIN!!
@kwameasiedu732814 сағат бұрын
Tsatsu is a humble man to debate such character
@SebastianAstom11 сағат бұрын
Hahahaha, i could see you've seen the pairing isn't matching.
@torgbekormla_deka10 сағат бұрын
@@SebastianAstom😂😂😂😂😂...swears 😂😅
@kokuAdiaba9 сағат бұрын
This not matching at all.....is that the kind of leaders that are ruling us including rastamen it soo crazy....wabon rough...
@torsuvictor25008 сағат бұрын
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣koasia
@jacksonmensahk451114 сағат бұрын
how did Freddie Blay get to be a lawyer. Even the English is not englishing😂
@KofiPrince-n9b14 сағат бұрын
Oh stop
@eugeneamankwah78057 сағат бұрын
I’m not sure you speak proper English yourself!
@isaacnyarko18316 сағат бұрын
Hmmmm😂
@MrOueda4 сағат бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 I wonderf ooo😅
@AbdoulatifBilal12 сағат бұрын
What a legal brain, intelligent as he is,even a primary school pupils will understand his teachings,chikata is a brain
@sethcofie73958 сағат бұрын
Why do you want to change his name to Chikata instead of Tsikata
@solomoncoffie953615 сағат бұрын
Putting this chipmunk 🐿️before the Lion clearly shows that “we have the men” is just rhetoric
@manmanny646215 сағат бұрын
Very apt description of criminal blay😂😂😂😂 a chipmunk indeed
@KofiPrince-n9b14 сағат бұрын
The NPP must be commended for showing wisdom while the NDC must be shamed for not taking such actions in the past. Law is not for the talkative but doer. Mr. Blay is just repeating what the SC said which must be abided by the speaker, your Lion cannot do anything about it. He can petition the SC if he is indeed a Lion
@donsagoe12 сағат бұрын
Solo, settings nkotsee o. Even Freddie is a CPP loanee. The npp is bereft of solid intellectuals. The NDC is truly the party of intellectuals.
@epignosisvisual81976 сағат бұрын
@@KofiPrince-n9b You need wisdom. You've showed your ignorance here.
@Ayerkihagan148110 сағат бұрын
23:32- 23:44 in summary 😅. Thank you Mr. Tsatsu
@edwardofori214710 сағат бұрын
This Blay man has just exposed himself 😂😂😂
@AbdoulatifBilal11 сағат бұрын
tsatu is a promax in law
@Bencarson_114 сағат бұрын
TV3 de3 the least said abt them the better! You bring an d politician to face an astute lawyer to debate the Law ???!😂😂😂😂
@rahimshash16318 сағат бұрын
you make my day with this comment 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂, just can't stop laughing....😂😂😂
@kofisolo46128 сағат бұрын
Blay could have stayed home. He embarrassed himself.
@Dr.Fr-grant36915 сағат бұрын
Mr blay why did you come on this show … next time don’t accept such invitation with Professor Tsatsu 😂😂😂
@KofiPrince-n9b14 сағат бұрын
What is Tsatsu saying which holds, nothing. He rather shouldn't have come
@mohAppiAH8 сағат бұрын
@@KofiPrince-n9b😂 you're paind
@yawcharles60487 сағат бұрын
Tsikata is the law clarity is top notch.
@thomassankara285715 сағат бұрын
Chairman Wontumi would have been better😂😂 Upon NPP's we have the men, I've never seen any of their best yet oo.
@jonathanopoku633647 минут бұрын
😂😂😂😂
@YoosahBiimi41 минут бұрын
@@thomassankara2857 where are the men ..I think there is an inherent problem in NPP and it will be exposed only when they go to opposition..because logically I know many aged thinkers and learned folks who could represent their party politically other than the present leadership they have...I think there is some problem somewhere... in 2012 and 2016 they had a tougher squad..Where are their men? May b some had been sidelined...politics is a big game...
@eliaofosu49397 сағат бұрын
Mr. Blay, since you keep on jumping from one party to another that is how your mind works. Jumping from one opinion to the other.
@bkallsportshighlights2 сағат бұрын
You pair a good lawyer with a good lawyer...
@kingmoneysburg11184 сағат бұрын
HIS CALMNESS alone is everything to me. He really deserves to be honoured the Chief Justice 2025 AND BEYOND. Lawyer Tsatsu, We hail you with Pride.
@benjaminksarpong22087 сағат бұрын
This is how NDC is blessed because looking at our elderly people like Tsatsu, the Graeat NDC is favoured..but yaanom and their lies are from their great grandparents...God have Mercy on them😅😅😅
@josephdarko540716 сағат бұрын
Npp do understands that what they are doing is wrong but they are using patapaa to defend wrongly. There's no interpretation in this matter it's clear for even jss students to understand.
@KofiPrince-n9b14 сағат бұрын
Really? Is the SC wrong? Don't write from emotions, Law is not about emotional but intelligence
@mohAppiAH8 сағат бұрын
@KofiPrince-n9b are they not humans as supreme court????😂
@kofisolo46128 сағат бұрын
@@KofiPrince-n9bThe SC shouldn't have allowed herself to be used by NPP MPs.
@Offer1013 сағат бұрын
Beatrice you did well today
@adompikaben5448Сағат бұрын
Students who fail exams suffers the most during the examination and you will always struggle if you decide to deffend wrong doings. Tsatsu is very relaxed because he is saying fact and truth.
@papakowarthur425610 сағат бұрын
But they declared their intention based on the fact that they are members of a certain party 😂😂😂 what a country
@sheillaemefa55187 сағат бұрын
How on this earth will you put these two together? TSATSU is the law . See how uncle BLAY dey sweat
@LawrenceNyarko9 сағат бұрын
And Miss Adu too is good I like her mind
@princeayivi540510 сағат бұрын
Tv3 please why do you pair my Daddy Blay with Tsikata why to make him look sorry or disgrace am
@Troymcmarshall11 сағат бұрын
Just look at how Blay is struggling to make sense. I used to think it was politics, but NPP has shown it's a party of very incompetent people. They appear extremely stupid.
@cudjoeamedoda81383 сағат бұрын
Mr Blay talks a lot but never explained anything tangible
@user-hc5gh7wv7u17 сағат бұрын
Blaylock is talking foolishness
@KofiPrince-n9b14 сағат бұрын
Not true
@benedictdzreke14037 сағат бұрын
Do you interpret facts? As a lay man, this is a common sense. God bless Ghana and make it great. Amen
@TheLaughLoungeAfricaСағат бұрын
See how Blay finding it difficult to put his sentence together truth will kill you
@aharon-mawu-wienipaanauel-liza12 сағат бұрын
I totally don’t understand anything Blay said
@jakpanana393811 сағат бұрын
Blay is either confused or simply refusing to understand.
@MrOueda4 сағат бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@DominicZakariaСағат бұрын
Likewise me😂😂
@MrOueda44 минут бұрын
@@DominicZakaria wasted Blay 😂😂😂😂😂😂
@jakpanana393811 сағат бұрын
And Freddie Blay fumbled throughout appearing to not even understand what Tsatsu Tsikata was saying. The constitution did not mention filing of papers to contest future elections anywhere but like the mischievous Torkonoo supreme court that is what he sought to cling unto. The Supreme court says if you abandon your party or independent status . The evidence is that all of them did exactly that right now , not in the future.
@felixkommey25058 сағат бұрын
Do these people know what we call cause and effect? Can an offender transfer the consequences of his action when he becomes a saint?
@raphaelbunwere28057 сағат бұрын
Blay is just speaking ordinary English no luminary lingua is in his submission please next time dont pair Tsatsu with Blay unless you want to disgrace someone
@sportsnewsghanablackstarsq93118 сағат бұрын
A simple question that can resolve the present controversy in Parliament in respect of the four vacation of parliamentary seats. Question: *When should a Member of Parliament vacate his seat. Is it during his present term in office or during his probable future term in office, should he win the future election?* Article 97 clause 1, paragraphs g and h of the constitution of Ghana. 1) A member of Parliament shall vacate his seat in parliament - (g) if he leaves the party of which he was a member at the time of his election to Parliament to join another party or seeks to remain in Parliament as an independent member; or (h) if he was elected a member of Parliament as an independent candidate and joins a political party. If it is argued that the member of parliament must not vacate his present seat but rather vacate a future seat if he probably wins a future election, then it would imply that, immediately he is declared a member of parliament in future, he must immediately vacate his seat, so that another election is organised for him to probably win again. This view would amount to causing other parliamentary candidates (including the political party candidates to contest the same elections twice) and to what end? If this view is upheld, it would also imply that a member of parliament who becomes the Speaker of Parliament, must not vacate his present seat in parliament but rather vacate a probable future seat in parliament. It would also imply that upon dissolution of parliament, members should vacate their probable future parliamentary seats. *Second follow-up question* In the context of this discussion, at which point, can it be conclusive that a member of parliament has either left his political party or joined a political party (if he was initially independent) ? *Answer to question two* The time of leaving the political party or joining one (if he was independent) occurs before the end of the present term of parliament. The time of filing for candidacy with the Electoral Commission is therefore reasonably conclusive as the time that he has left his political party or joined a political party (if he was independent). *Think about this carefully; How can someone who is presently the parliamentary candidate of a political party say that he is not presently a member of that political party.* The very moment an independent Member of Parliament becomes the parliamentary candidate of a political party for an upcoming election, at that very moment, it is confirmed that he is a Member of that political party because only Members of a political party can represent a political party in an Election. Similarly, the very moment an MP of a political party becomes Independent, he is automatically in direct opposition to the official choice of candidate of the political party, and it can therefore not be said that he is still a Member of the political party. Such a person has by his present action, presently left the political party. *Final question* Should a political party be the only one to report that a person is no longer a member of the party? *Answer* In this context, any citizen can point out or report a wrongdoing *Summary* Article 97 is clear that the parliamentary seat to be vacated is the present seat and not a future probable seat. The time of filing for candidacy with the Electoral Commission contrary to his "present status in parliament" is therefore the reasonable conclusive evidence that a member of parliament has either left his party, or joined a party (if he was independent); *and must therefore vacate his seat with immediate effect*,.
@VifahEtseyRichard6 сағат бұрын
I salute , the law.
@soydear777710 сағат бұрын
So what is Freddie Blay saying? His mouth is full but very unclear and incoherent
@hetty78913 сағат бұрын
So my question is NPP going to FORCE those 4 MPs who vacate their seats to still be MPs in parliament??? nothing make sense in Ghana 🤦🏾♀️🤦🏾♀️
@homegardeninguk9 сағат бұрын
It has never been about them filing, the key point is them changing alliegence . Even if they had not filed for the next election, they should have vacated their seats
@affiebenezer293015 сағат бұрын
How then did the NPP got the majority? Because the independent MP could not have changed his party.
@nathanielwright-j2u2 сағат бұрын
Please read the constitution
@Haile-x3t16 сағат бұрын
Mr. Blay you shouldn't have accepted the invitation to come on the program or you forgot that Mr. Tsatsu is there? Henceforth, they NOT bring someone like Mr. Blay to face the legal legend.
@KofiPrince-n9b14 сағат бұрын
What is it that Mr Tsatsu said that will change the SC ruling or deny the affected MPs their seat back? Such an argument will be deemed good
@dannytoddy331011 сағат бұрын
Lawyer Blay is confusing and over struggling to make sense of himself😮
@kingmoneysburg11184 сағат бұрын
Mr TSIKATA is the Law of the Land, his explanation is final. Blay pls stop contradicting your self with words that is confusing you personally . THE LAW HAS SPOKEN PERIOD
@obiri200011 сағат бұрын
Some of the old folks are devoid of logic. Blau has totally disgraced himself
@SimonPeterDagadu13 сағат бұрын
Mr. Blay, what are you saying?
@ekowhoward553014 сағат бұрын
They should have matched Attorney General with Tsatsu or Tsatsu with young lawyer Kweku Paintsil
@patricksenoo159315 сағат бұрын
This is mismatch..Mr Tsatsu is a best teacher
@KofiPrince-n9b13 сағат бұрын
Really? Are his statements going to change the ruling? If not then he isn't a good teacher
@KofiPrince-n9b13 сағат бұрын
Really? Are his statements going to change the ruling? If not then he isn't a good teacher
@prudentago857230 минут бұрын
@KofiPrince-n9b you are not making any sense with any of your comments
@aharon-mawu-wienipaanauel-liza12 сағат бұрын
An unfair match. Even some judges were his students, Blay included
@edwinniilanteyvanderpuye19656 сағат бұрын
Freddie Blay, Please respectfully the Speaker dwelt on the Notice of Poll. Which is a factual document indicating that the 4 persons have filed at the EC.
@JonahGobah15 сағат бұрын
I see many people commenting about the pairing of these two gentlemen. I think people are scared for Mr. Blay.
@dennisbrown793015 сағат бұрын
😂😂😂wei You must be an idiot to think that way
@KofiPrince-n9b13 сағат бұрын
Nooo, he is just repeating what the SC said which Mr Tsatsu will abide by even with his lengthy comments
@niiayitey961817 минут бұрын
Ei Ei Ei Tsatsu should me made the chief justice forever. We have to study tsatsu at the law school
@ernestsakah669616 сағат бұрын
Wrong environment for Tsatsu, From the host to the co-panelist.
@KofiPrince-n9b14 сағат бұрын
He is not being honest that is why the environment is wrong for him
@MCPaul-if4gs15 сағат бұрын
How on earth do you upgrade this Blay by inviting him in the presence of Tsatsu Tsikata The host should do better next time.
@KofiPrince-n9b13 сағат бұрын
Tsatsu couldn't help the NDC in their election petition, what are you saying
@theodoreagadzi955811 сағат бұрын
@@KofiPrince-n9b Go and tell the Supreme Court judges also to allow Jean Mensah to be cross examined by Mr. Tsatsu as the normal proceedings of the court and see whether NDC will win the case or not. As at now, we don't know the result for the 2020 presidential election.
@albinasalata91139 сағат бұрын
Mr Tsikata asked Tsatsu a question, u have done well madam
@answeredcallformotivationa5188 сағат бұрын
You also heard it
@razakamidu550311 сағат бұрын
Npp where are the man
@ORBPOSSE10 сағат бұрын
A bit hard to watch Freddy Blay trying to explain the law 😳🫢
@PhilipOtu-ow5uj15 сағат бұрын
Mr Blay was making a bogus argument, before anything else Asiamah was sacked from the party because of his decision to go independent, subsequently he was readmitted into the party which qualified him to contest in the party’s primaries, while filling his nomination forms to contest in the primaries he needed party members in the constituency to endorse his candidature and not just anyone dwelling in the constituency. By going through that process means he’s no longer an independent elected mp but a card bearing member of the NPP. This is a bad precedent being set and this will haunt the political parties going forward.
@KofiPrince-n9b14 сағат бұрын
It will not hurt them. The NPP is an intelligent party. They are also a serious party . Future intention cannot be interpreted as an action now. The SC gave precedents
@PhilipOtu-ow5uj13 сағат бұрын
@ so they thought when they took those actions not long ago in 2020, not long after that they wanted to axe Adwoa Safo from parliament because she wasn’t helping their course which motion is still pending in parliament. That attempt foiled because it wasn’t an NPP speaker in the seat. Posterity isn’t far and their so called intelligence as they claim to will be folly in no distance future.
@Manna-BSG4 сағат бұрын
The funny thing is the npp have candidates contesting against their so called vacant members 😂
@anthonyebenezer287711 сағат бұрын
Mr Blay what are you trying to say?
@joseikwame8 сағат бұрын
Whenever I hear this conversation, i always see one person confusing himself.
@ISAACMENSAH-o5b15 сағат бұрын
Lawyer Blay is confusing me here
@thomassankara285715 сағат бұрын
Not only you. He's confused himself.
@KofiPrince-n9b14 сағат бұрын
I think you want to say the SC has confused you. But you will still have to obey the ruling. He is just repeating the ruling which Tsatsu will abide by as a Ghanaian
@Dr.Fr-grant36915 сағат бұрын
Is the lady confused? Why would she say mr Tsikata ask tsatsu 😂 how
@isaacnyarko18316 сағат бұрын
Speak Twi Please Mr Blay please 🙏
@Simpletricks2lyf4 сағат бұрын
He speaks Nzema
@josephdarko540716 сағат бұрын
If its affected npp, they will use all dubious means to defend and be coating articles upon articles.
@qaazaba766110 сағат бұрын
Mr. Status is super, could you see how Mr. Blay's explanation was going?
@dreambaba700515 сағат бұрын
3News you've really disappointed us for not giving good pairing. Would have been better with a seasoned lawyer and Mr Tsatsu on the show.
@wilberforceagbenyegah563214 сағат бұрын
All of the sensible ones are running away, Only Blay wants to play the devil's advocate. There are some of them who are ready to throw their integrities to the dogs. There was one Tabitha on Metro TV yesterday flopping and shouting.😂🤣🤣
@KofiPrince-n9b14 сағат бұрын
Am really amazed by your comment. Are you the only stranger in Jerusalem? What different thing is Mr. Blay saying that the SC didn't? Tsatsu is rather fighting a lost battle
@raphaelbunwere28057 сағат бұрын
He cannot answer it just beating around the bush.
@foodforall_Dr.B12 сағат бұрын
To settle all these, we have to establish/define when something needs Supreme Court interpretation and make sure that interpretation is not applied retrospectively. Therefore, if you have any interest in seeking interpretation, it must be done before the law is applied. Once a law is applied, all interpretation will be applied in future incidences.
@kofisolo46128 сағат бұрын
What is Blay talking about? Trying hard to understand him.
@ElijahOpoku511 сағат бұрын
Tsastu Tsikata and who?
@jackgenfiordiesel855913 сағат бұрын
NPP is a John party
@lesliequarshie31648 сағат бұрын
Afenyo Markin sought the Supreme Court to misinterprete the constitution not to interpret it.
@JPerry-m2g7 сағат бұрын
This Blay guy is all over the place. Honestly, NPP party is a bunch of very dishonest people
@slimfbiggyansah429548 минут бұрын
It's not an interesting question, according to the constitution, that MP should have even vacated his seat before the notice poll bcos he joined the NPP n contested for their primaries and won before the NPP presented him as a candidate. In fact they should have been held in contempt of parliament if they attended any parliamentary proceedings during the space of that time. So Belays argument falls on its face
@EmmanuelOsei-pp9vg14 сағат бұрын
We are wasting our taxpayer's money on people like Freddie Blay. Look at the people leading us? Tsatsu shouldn't accept this kind of invitation to meet with Freddie Blay type
@derickjd52748 сағат бұрын
He's his friend lol.
@MrOueda4 сағат бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂😂 there is no man in Npp ooo😂😂 waste of time
@answeredcallformotivationa5188 сағат бұрын
Anyone who talks too much miss it That blay man is talking repeatedly without knowing he's talking to a professional lawyer
@NiimoiAllotey-ns1sw12 сағат бұрын
When one is given the chance to make a case, you do not intercept. That's discipline. Blay is just the opposite.
@Braellah15 сағат бұрын
What Fredie blay qualifications 😂😂😂😂😂😂
@Simpletricks2lyf4 сағат бұрын
He is a lawyer, Tsatsu was his lecturer at Ug
@MrOueda4 сағат бұрын
😅😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@christianzowada9957 сағат бұрын
Is the interpretation of the law not to clear and block loopholes of the law. If questions and suggestions are being put forward about this interpretation then i think we need to revisit the issue
@mathiaskovor854316 сағат бұрын
What at all is Blay saying, make reasonable comment not unreasonableness.
@KofiPrince-n9b14 сағат бұрын
Really? What different thing is he saying that the SC didn't?
@MrOueda4 сағат бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@SebastianAstom11 сағат бұрын
Mr. Blay is not making any point to the main issue and the questions asked to him.
@MaxAD145 сағат бұрын
Tsatsu is the law and the law is Tsatsu. Torkonu should come and learn the law.
@Robert-d9k1k7 сағат бұрын
Wrong pairing 😂😂😂😂
@abrahamappiah71054 сағат бұрын
Uncle Blay ur law is dead
@mustaphamensah107715 сағат бұрын
It’s poor pairing of guests. It is an insult to put Blay on a panel to argue law with Tsatsu