FREE WORD ORDER in OA FU | Bird Speech

Follow up!
00:17 - Word Order Universals
00:29 - Case Marking
01:32 - Irish Pronunciation
03:35 - English Topic First?
04:29 - Carolina Chickadees
-----
LINKS:
WORD ORDER UNIVERSALS: www.amazon.com...
IRISH INITIAL MUTATIONS: en.wikipedia.o...
EMBASSYTOWN: www.amazon.com...
CORRECTIONS: docs.google.co...
WORLD ANVIL: www.worldanvil...
-----
ARTIFEXIAN ON THE INTERWEB:
PATREON: / artifexian
TWITTER: / artifexian
PODCAST: / @artifexianpodcast
REDDIT: / artifexian
-----
SPECIAL THANKS PATRONS:
Terrablae
Spencer Brownlee
Alexander Roper
Andrew P Chehayl
John Hooyer
World Anvil
Ripta Pasay
Usedwashbucket
JJ Albrecht
Juan yepez
P'undrak
Slorany
Ben McFarlane
George Weilenmann
IHateSigningUpForThings
A3ulez
Sean M
Yoshin8or
Reno Lam
-----
MUSIC:
Udo Grunewald
-----
Thanks for watching everyone. It means a lot. :)

[@Keys879]

Actually the birds are talking to each other. Groups of birds will adopt specific calls and sounds familiar to their troupe. It stands to reason this is one of the most basic forms of communication and demonstrates how deeply rooted language is into animal brains. Way cool.

[@bishop1412]

AAAECCCCDhDD "Yo, there's a bad guy down there, look out! I'm in a holding pattern way up, cos there's a snack down there that imma try and nab once the baddie leaves."

[@xhesil8848]

We went from word order to bird order! I'll see myself out.

[@blackwood9782]

nice XD

[@d1g1beastpr1me7]

The bird order is the word order

[@xhesil8848]

The 69 likes is a nice touch.

[@d1g1beastpr1me7]

@@xhesil8848 Enjoy it while it lasts

[@Carmenifold]

woaaahhhh the chickadee stuff is like. allllmost a kind of simple proto-language. that's wild

[@r3dak73d-6]

Whats really interesting is that the birds seem to be able to pick up on sequences they’ve never heard before and understand what it means, and there are even different “dialects” to them. There was an article I skimmed where two species lived close to each other; one species was able to understand and respond to the call of another with the same meaning, and understand and react to it, but entirely without using this specific sound themselves.

[@Carmenifold]

@@r3dak73d-6 incredible

[@alapikomamalolonui6424]

@@Carmenifold When reality seems "incredible" (as in "a wonderment"), that just means we can be very happy that nature can still surprise us! Rejoice in being happy and surprised! :) It seems that a set of species who've been vocally communicating with each other for around several hundred million years might have developed some "primitive" understanding of basic logic! Perhaps the birds will "take possession" of the planet at some point in the future? Aloha nui 'oe! :) 🤙

[@samkimber6747]

Neuter nominative and neuter accusative are the same in Classical Greek and Latin, as well. PIE does in some reconstructions too.

[@kostas9592]

In modern Greek too, nominative and accusative for the neuter gender are the same, as well as the vocative.

[@Copyright_Infringement]

>"PIE does in some reconstructions too." >"some" Wait, are there any reconstructions that have a separate neuter case? All of the ones I know of, even the split-ergative ones, reconstruct the neuter as beïng the same as both subject and object

[@kitdubhran2968]

I’ve been learning welsh (and Irish once upon a time) and now I can’t pronounce “in Portland” where I used to live. It’s always im Bortland. Damn lenition. It makes so much more sense.

[@renerpho]

The nominative and accusative being the same for neuter nouns is a leftover from Proto-Indo-European. For both nominative and accusative, PIE has same endings: Singular: thematic neuter -Ø, athematic neuter -o-m Dual: thematic neuter -ih₁, athematic neuter -o-y(h₁) Plural: thematic neuter -h₂, athematic neuter -e-h₂ Hence why the nominative and accusative neuter are the same in so distantly related languages like German, Russian, Latin (and almost all of the Romance languages), Greek and Sanskrit. It's one of those giveaway features of Indo-European languages. If you are dealing with an Indo-European language, you can be almost certain that the nominative and accusative neuter are the same. If you are dealing with an unrelated language, chances are the case system is either completely different (as in Bantu languages) or features different nominative and accusative neuter case markings.

[@Dragoniiia]

oh shit. I just checked how it is in Polish and like.... holy shit. nominative and accusative are the samehere as well!

[@smuecke]

I find it quite amusing that someone asked _in English_ if nominative and accusative could have the same form.

[@watson-disambiguation]

The Chickadee Syntax is very fascinating. I wonder what people have studied about birds like corvids and parrots, birds noun to be very intelligent in the respect of having language.

[@water594]

WOOO MAE TREIGLADAU YN WYCH! In slang Welsh Lenition is just done whenever you feel like it or whenever it makes the language flow better, but isn't as hard and fast as in fformal Welsh Also have a look at Crows for "potential species with language", theres not so much research but they seem to have different "words" for different threats/predators and food sources. And their chatter is almost completely undescifered.

[@bishop1412]

good to know that there's no vormal Welsh

[@Nemo_Anom]

Prairie dogs are also known to have "language" just as complex as anything chickadees or crows are doing.

[@Stephen-Fox]

Crows - at least according to In The Company of Crows and Ravens - also have regional dialects, for want of a better way of describing it. And a crow that goes to a different flock with a different dialect will alter its calls to mimick the dominant dialect of that flock, apparently.

[@approximateCognition]

Are you eventually gonna publish Oa as a full language? Just wondering.

[@centoe5537]

洄川鈴番 I know someone is producing a grammar for some of biblaridions languages, so maybe they can do Oa after

[@approximateCognition]

@@centoe5537 I'll be looking for it then!

[@Oddn7751]

He has confirmed that it's not meant to be more than just a showcase of how to apply what he shows in the videos.

[@approximateCognition]

@@Oddn7751 I know, but I'm interested nonetheless.

[@impishDullahan]

Oh damn, I knew about the wackness that is the Carolina chickadee, they already are a heavy indpiration for a non-human conlang of mine, but it seems I must've missed an article in my research. I think black caps also exhibit something similar to the fancy-schmancy construction wherein the reduplication is mutated but don't quote me and my conflated notes.

[@durstein]

What about the meerkat language stuff they found recently? Distinct constructions for others names and predators. Not sure if they discovered syntax but animal language seems to be out there. Cool stuff. Great video as always.

[@Mercure250]

I mean, animals having somewhat complex communication systems is not limited to that species of bird. I remember dolphins having a pretty dope way of communicating too, where individuals actually have a signature sound, used to identify themselves, and then can use different kinds of sounds to deliver some information (though more research has to be done). And the bees, man. The bees. Though it's not through sound, it's still pretty cool. But yeah, those birds are really cool.

[@nicolasglemot6760]

I've read very similar things about Campbell's mona monkeys having relatively complex, structured communication

[@hanngallifrey8314]

I saw bird speech and thought you were going to mention turkish bird language, a language made up of whistles that the people use to communicate long distance in the valleys between mountains. but alas, I was even more surprised!

[@BozheTsaryaKhrani]

I havent watched ur pods yet btut just scrolled through them and i love how they are numbered in base 12

[@centoe5537]

Watching this now I guess

[@Oddn7751]

Tell us about your Discord server!

[@connorredding]

Started learning latin in school this year having no idea about all this and these videos help so much with all the rules and stuff

[@ppenmudera4687]

Side note for Nomintive-Accusative marking: a lot of languages have the tendency to mark the nom and acc (or erg and abs in ergative languages I guess) of neuter/(most) inanimate nouns with the same marking. Besides German (and related languages like Dutch), romance languages do this too, like Latin (bellum (nom) -> bellum (acc)) and ancient Greek (το σωμα (nom) -> το σωμα (acc). This hold true for both singular and plural (and dual in ancient Greek). I think this is because neuter/inanimate nouns aren't considered as important as other classes.

[@windsaw151]

And as a side note: The gender of the example used (Mädchen meaning Girl) is neuter.

[@Mercure250]

It's not that inanimate nouns aren't important, but the distinction between nominative and accusative for them isn't as important. I'm guessing that's because inanimate nouns are less likely to be the subject, or more specifically, to be the subject of a transitive verb (i.e. the agent). And even if they are, the object is likely to be animate, because inanimate things doing something to other inanimate things is generally of little importance to us (or rather, would be of little importance to our ancestors), so we don't (or didn't) really communicate it as often in our day-to-day life. For the record, the examples you gave are all Indo-European, so I'm wondering if it's actually a universal truth that a lot of languages tend to mark both the nominative and the accusative the same way. If they're all from the same family, it doesn't count.

[@__donez__]

I can't wait to hear you talk about the Carolina chickadee on the next podcast

[@Vininn126]

This is the second time you've replied to a comment of mine, and both times they've been about the pronunciation of something. Something something senpai sees me? No that's wrong. Thanks for addressing my question! Please keep up the quality material Edit: That very informative. And yeah, dialects throw me off too

[@fearmor3855]

Ye lenition can sometimes be left out as a fuck up sometimes, it'd be like if you tripped over your tongue and got a sound wrong in English, except slightly more common

[@HoneydewBeach]

I want to be fluent in bird now

[@daniel_rossy_explica]

That bird speech seems very closely related to Pokemon Speech, or is jus me?

[@Gibbons3457]

I'm currently working on a very basic conlang (hahaha) for a fantasy race I invented. They have an analogous structure to birds in that the can produce two sounds simultaneously. They also happened to do a reverse Hebrew, Yiddish situation, where they had a language which was full of dialects and grammar differences and different words and rules in different countries but to make diplomacy easier they invented a language where all information is "perfectly" recorded so that if you were to write or speak a sentence it could never be Chinese whispers into a completely new meaning due to how specific the language is. But that same language is slow and stilted and literally impossible to use for everyday use. But humans cannot speak either language because it's not possible to make two sounds together, it takes two humans to read out loud in this other races language. But this race can and often do perfectly mimic humans to the point that it's uncanny. It's been a really fun thought exercise so far, mostly because I haven't the time to sit down and build it as an actual conlang.

[@Naokarma]

3:20 in the worlds of CallMeKevin: "There is no Southern Ireland. There's Ireland and then there's *Northern* Ireland."

[@milesrout]

'Southern Irish' probably refers to Munster Irish, not to the Irish of Ireland.

[@Okaiako]

Like how there's no East Virginia, just Virginia and West Virginia.

[@Villhelm-e]

I'm offended by your bad chikadee grammar: starting the video with D?

[@Redbeardblondie]

Concerning the Chickadee song, I am actually planning to start my conlang journey with a bird language, then developing the “Tongue of Fate/Names” from that. Magic in my fantasy world is fundamentally similarly to “The Name of the Wind,” (though the language merely provides Sigils of Entities and Events as subjects for a desired outcome which is described through sympathetic rituals). The Tongues of Men will be based on human utterances, with only a little impact from Birdsong. If you have any knowledge of linguistics courses that could help me grasp the basics, that would be awesome (your stuff is cool, but it flies right over my head)!

[@r3dak73d-6]

Biblaridion(lets hope I spelled that right) has a very good series on creating a conlang. It’s in his style, which means creating a proto-lang and then evolving it, but I found the videos very useful when trying to figure out where to start because learning linguistics isn’t a linear path. I recommend watching through that series first, then going back through and pausing it and looking up what you don’t understand. He also has a series where he’s live-making a conlang, so it may help you with seeing the process. Take it slow and remember that when creating a conlang your overall goal should just be to create something that you’re happy with. If you already know about all of this and are still having trouble, my guess (which could be totally off ofc) is that either you just haven’t practiced enough or you’re missing one of the more fundamental building blocks of knowledge. (dumb analogy: think like trying to do algebra w/out knowing what number comes after 10) If that’s the case it might be good to start with English grammar courses, which will help you to put the more abstract linguist concepts to real world examples you use more frequently. After understanding that stuff is when you can start to really build the more complex features of a language. Hopefully something from this might help a little! good luck!

[@Redbeardblondie]

Dakota B I actually started out in life heavy into grammar classes as a kid (mom was originally a grammar teacher), learned it to understand its use, then totally forgot the lingo and particulars. I also suck real bad at learning other languages for some reason, but I was planning on finally nailing down a course on Spanish. Maybe I should take a grammar course first... Thx for the advice!

[@julianodobler2782]

Hey Artifexian, are you going to continue the earth-like climates series?

[@centoe5537]

Have you linked the bird thing?

[@approximateCognition]

Can't find it either.

[@centoe5537]

洄川鈴番 www.americanscientist.org/article/the-complex-call-of-the-carolina-chickadee

[@Mr.Nichan]

I believe the term "direct case" is used for languages where one case can be either nominative or accusative but contrasts with other cases (as in Irish, although the misleading term "nominative" also unfortunately get's used for this due to familiarity and tradition). (In morphosyntactic alignment terms, a "direct case" can be used for S of an intransitive verb and A or P of a transitive verb, i.e., simple absolutive cases don't count.) That's definitely how I use the term in my conlanging, at least. The complication is that it's often used in languages like Hindustani and Tagalog, where the "direct case" CAN be S, A, or P arguments, but sometimes one of these roles is marked with something else: In Hindustani, nominative, accusative, ergative, and absolutive all line up to the same case most of the time (the direct case), but pronouns in the perfective aspect have an ergative case, meaning that the "direct case" is actually an absolutive on pronouns in perfective clauses. In Tagalog, the "direct case" actually marks a sort of "focused" noun, which can be thought of as the subject of the verb, whose "trigger" (similar to voice) tells what semantic role that noun plays. A "direct" noun can serve as S, A, P, or any of a number of oblique roles. If an A, P or ?S is not "focused", then it is put in the "indirect case". The situation with German cases is called "syncretism" (although that term is also used for a historical process that causes it). That means that the cases are sometimes distinguished and sometimes not (unlike in Irish, where they are never distinguished). German actually only makes this distinction with masculine singular noun phrases. Latin, on the other hand, makes this distinction in most situations, but almost never with neuter nouns. As others have pointed out, the lack of distinction between nominative and accusative with neuter nouns is an inherited Indo-European feature. German, however, later lost this distinction with feminine and plural nouns too, sometime in it's development from Proto-Indo-European. This change that removed the distinction beteen two things is what synchretism means in the historical linguistics sense.

[@__donez__]

I was told that it's universal that for Indo-European languages with noun case and a m-f-n noun class system, the neuter nominative and accusative forms are always identical. At least that's what my Latin lesson told me. That's interesting that your German example (0:29) supports this claim!

[@kaioocarvalho]

From what I know ot works in Russian too.

[@InezAllen]

ooo so I've been... sort of... learning Manx Gaelic and apparently they sort of have lenition like the other Celtic languages but as the language died and is being revived lenition has either disappeared or become the same in all environments depending on the speaker. I think. it's one of those

[@TheAnalyticalEngine]

It's argued that prairie dogs have complex communication to describe not just the presence of predators, but also things like their colour, shape, speed etc. Check out the Wikipedia entry for prairie dogs, and go to the sub-section "anti-predator calls" - there's a link to a paper by Constantine Slobodchikoff on the subject. There's also some stuff about it here on youtube, and elsewhere

[@withercraft9895]

May you make a video with pronunciation of all IPA? It's really hard to work just without that(thanks from Russia).

[@Myzelfa]

With regard to cuid/chuid, speakers make small errors like that all the time and it's smoothed over by context.

[@korkad_]

birds speaking a language is actually explored in the speculative evolution of Serina if youve ever checked out that projekt

[@Mr.Nichan]

Isn't it true that nominative and accusative are always the same case in Irish, even though it contrasts with 3 other cases (genitive, vocative, and prepositional)?

[@scptime1188]

Hey, do you know how you mentioned 4 fingered creatures in your counting sytem video? Are you ever gonna do a colab on your channel with someone to make it a thing? I really want to see the biology and evolution of your fictional creatures.

[@jan_Masewin]

Imagine a whistling language that requires perfect pitch... >:)

[@angeredgoose7552]

El silbo

[@ShadowoftheDude]

I should have mentioned this on the original video but I'll put it here (as I think this is what the second commenter was asking about): There is actually a morphosyntactic alignment wherein A & P share a case and S is unmarked. This is called Transitive Alignment or a Double-Oblique System. It's not just theoretical, it has been attested, however it is important to note that like Ergative-Absolutive alignment it is marginal with another alignment being treated as default. In the languages we've found it in this alignment is only used in the past tense, for example. I know, wikipedia isn't a source, but this is where I learned of it: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morphosyntactic_alignment #7 under "Types of Alignment."

[@messenger3478]

The bird speach reminds me that Tolkien had a bird speak its own language in the Hobbit.

[@modeschar]

7:03 - This sounds like Ithorians in Star Wars. They have two mouths and speak in stereo.

[@lebleu8843]

Worldbuilding strategic resources?

[@vexredder7106]

Would a isolating language need Nominativ akkusativ or dativ

[@qwertyTRiG]

ISL (and other European and European-derived sign languages, such as Auslan and ASL) are heavily topic-comment.

[@janmatula1534]

i think the ch in mädchen is actually pronounced more like the ch in bach.

[@lunkel8108]

There are front vowels around it, so it's a [ç]. "Bach" has a [x]. There probably is some dialect out there where you would pronounce "Mädchen" with a [x] but it certainly isn't the case in standard german.

[@jegkompletson1698]

You look like Captain Haddock

[@WatermelonEnthusiast9]

The birds are talking to each other, all animals talk to each other. Humans arent the only animals that talk to each other. Its possible, no, probable that there speech is just as complex as any human language.

[@eldattackkrossa9886]

cool

[@pipolwes000]

I didn't know German used the neuter gender for children and was confused when you said that the word for "girl" used the article "das". TIL

[@TheHunterOfYharnam]

how to build a map for a moon that contains life :D

[@lythd]

I’m early for once yay

[@rozimondquartz8310]

DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD

[@rozimondquartz8310]

D!

[@MrRyanroberson1]

pretty early, huh.

[@seilaessecanalnvaitervideo6414]

i the 667th to leave a like

[@Zachi_190]

Ę

[@xX_wiLLiam_Xx]

di di di di di di di

[@mezzofloat]

no good comments

[@centoe5537]

Skull Wizard It's been like 12 seconds, what do you expect?

[@Oddn7751]

@@centoe5537 We expect good comments!

[@approximateCognition]

Sorry?

[@oz_jones]

You're not helping matters, chief.