FreeSync vs G-Sync - Can You See The Difference?

► Head to www.backblaze.com/ufd to get a 15-day full featured no-risk free trial today!
► AMD Wallpaper: bit.ly/30yflME
► Intel/Nvidia Wallpaper: bit.ly/2LX5s7Z
Big thanks to:
► Wootware: www.wootware.co.za/
► iFixIt: ifixit.com/UFDTech
► Displate: displate.com/ufdtechofficial
Use coupon code "UFD" for 15% off
Total Cost: $5500
Parts list for build:
Case: Phanteks Enthoo Elite - amzn.to/2VhLR73
AMD System
CPU: Ryzen 7 2700X - amzn.to/2Lu6Iz8
CPU Cooler: Fractal Design Celsius S36 - amzn.to/2DMDo0H
Motherboard: ASUS ROG Crosshair VII Hero - amzn.to/2Y6b15j
RAM: G.Skill Trident Z RGB 32GB (4x8GB) 3200MHz - amzn.to/2VcRL9i
SSD: Mushkin Pilot 2TB NVME - amzn.to/2V94ee2
GPU: Reference AMD Radeon VII - amzn.to/2H0tOJD
PSU: Thermaltake Toughpower Grand RGB 850W - amzn.to/2Jbz3HT
Intel/Nvidia System:
CPU: Intel Core i9-9900K - amzn.to/2Wu1nsE
CPU Cooler: Either Cryorig C7 CU or DeepCool Captain 240PRO RGB - amzn.to/2WfZrnH
amzn.to/2LhLVyV
Motherboard: ASUS ROG Z390-i - amzn.to/2VNSldi
RAM: G.Skill Trident Z Royal Silver 16GB (2x8GB) 3200MHz - amzn.to/2GXJ8qd
SSD: Mushkin Pilot 2TB NVME - amzn.to/2V94ee2
GPU: Founder's Edition Nvidia RTX 2080 Ti - amzn.to/2VcT1ZV
PSU: Super Flower 1000W 80+ Gold - bit.ly/2PIaqnz
► Support Us On Patreon: www.patreon.com/UFDTech
►For the intro/outro music by Kalyptra: goo.gl/KyLzTB
►Twitter - ufdisciple
►Facebook - ufdtech
►Instagram - ufd_tech
►Twitch - www.twitch.com/ufdisciple
Thanks to Reece Hill for filming the video!
Thanks to Catlin Stevenson for editing the video!

[@UFDTech]

► Head to www.backblaze.com/ufd to get a 15-day full featured no-risk free trial today! ► AMD Wallpaper: bit.ly/30yflME ► Intel/Nvidia Wallpaper: bit.ly/2LX5s7Z

[@youngbyronofficial]

UFD Tech yo homie

[@gijoeljamesmaldonado]

where are the links to the displays?

[@wing0zero]

If your in the market for a Freesync monitor look out for Freesync 2. Most Freesync monitors failed the Nvidia check for the simple fact it didn't come enabled out of the box and you have to manually turn it on which is just stupid.

[@houssemayadi6992]

do i have to buy and download Wallpaper Engine before being able to use these wallpapes ?

[@roblignell]

@@houssemayadi6992 yes

[@MarkoHR]

*compares 2 different monitors* Oh that's different

[@richardsamanthajones5476]

Vsync dosent give free sync Doubt they make 2 of same monitor that do free syn and vsync Thus the difference in monitors . Thought the same at first but ....ya

[@blkbyrd]

@@richardsamanthajones5476 a bunch of companies make G Sync and Freesync versions of the same monitor...

[@ZeroTTK]

Richard\Samantha Jones Mine has both

[@JasonWBlades]

Great idea. How about monitors with the same panel though?

[@Nianfur]

Ghosting is the panel, not the adaptive refresh technology. Maybe next time, get the same panel? Damned sure Acer have equivalent models. The Freesync version will be cheaper btw.

[@spintesttech]

Bro ghosting comes from the monitor not the Graphic cards, so you should change the monitors

[@hkoizumi3134]

Spooky monitors

[@spintesttech]

@@hkoizumi3134 well i really think they should change the monitors and do the comparison with the same framerate also, that's fare.

[@Tallnerdyguy]

Yep, poor comparison....

[@spintesttech]

@@Tallnerdyguy well i wouldn't say poor bur not fair for sure, and definitely they can do better.

[@a6893_]

Well they were checking for screen tearing not visual quality.

[@Xikiruen]

Freesync now refreshes the panel twice when the frames drops under 50 (in this case) so if the graphics card delivers 40 the panel will run at 80 so no screen tearing even at low fps

[@blumac9801]

raul darat I was wondering why that kept happening while I was playing X-Plane 11

[@Tallnerdyguy]

Only if it has ULFC (I think thats what it's called) and only a few monitors currently

[@kawii9793]

LFC is a thing but LFC-Flickering is, too. Because of the brightnessflicker this causes on my MSI Optix 271CQR i can't use Freee/G-Sync

[@suhas-qw4nu]

Dude that's LFC Not all Freesync monitors have LFC all Freesync 2.0 monitors have LFC But most Freesync 2.0 monitors are just as expensive Gsync counterparts

[@Alirezarz62]

Yeah i have a msi mag27cq which is 1440p 144hz freesync and i dont see any tearing at below 40! (i believe the range is 45 - 144hz) and no tearing even at more than 200fps! (like overwatch which I'm getting 300 fps) and I'm using a gtx 1080

[@rztrzt]

This comparison is so flawed...

[@suadmemo2412]

They are young and still learning^^

[@topbanana4013]

then tell us why 5 words does not mean shit

[@METALLIFY16]

How is it flawed? Theyre comparing the two technologies in the way that a consumer would decide.

[@petek5021]

@@METALLIFY16 they're also comparing two different monitors. One being $100 more expensive than the other.

[@mr.darknight416]

@@petek5021 yh bc it has a dedicated G sync hardware, that is why its 100$ more

[@Buffinator1988]

Provided the monitors are decent. There's NO discernable difference between gsync and free sync when configured correctly. Decent free sync monitors have LFC. And blur is caused by pixel response time not as some artifact of sync technology so entirely panel dependent.

[@DerrickRG]

Lol, WRONG.

[@greybuckleton]

@@DerrickRG no he is right. Ghosting is a screen latency issue. Gaming monitors should have low response times. Good monitors usually have the overdrive feature to help control this. None of this has anything to do with adaptive sync.

[@greybuckleton]

@@joer8854 Yeah exactly, they even say that at the end of the video. This was pretty much a monitor comparison not an adaptive sync one.

[@salemgiath8150]

Robinson Joe Yea but just because they don’t have the budget they chose to make it so scuffed.. If you don’t have the budget for a comparison video, don’t make one.

[@salemgiath8150]

Xavier Gomez It’s not shaming. It’s criticizing them for an extremely unprofessional work. “Oh we have 2 monitors in our office? Wait.. one is gsync and other FreeSync? Ok let’s compare technologies based on what we just happen to have here”

[@dragopac5065]

I think it would have been better if you used 2 exact same quality monitor. Half of the comments during the video was around ghosting more apparent on the freesync monitor. This is why we need to check response time, hz and input lag when looking to buy a new monitor.... Sorry for my bad english!!

[@kevinsecundino930]

What monitor do u recommend for me that has 144hz and g sync

[@AS-gb5wz]

What? Freesync also have feature for eliminating tearing below the freesync window called the Low Framerate Compensation.

[@UFDTech]

Only on FreeSync 2 setups, which again indicates to the different type of quality you can get from monitor to monitor.

[@Devilman666]

@ufd tech The freesync 2 standard mandates lfc's inclusion but that doesn't mean that there aren't monitors with freesync Gen 1 that had lfc its just the manufacturer didn't HAVE to include lfc as a feature but plenty of them threw it in there.

[@Thelango99]

@@UFDTech No, my freesync monitor has LFC and it is only freesync 1. The lfc function itself is done in software on the GPU.

[@Thelango99]

LFC has been a thing since 2017.

[@Devilman666]

Lfc is not a gpu software feature. It's a feature of the monitor. Some support it, some don't. Ufc tech is wrong that it has to be freesync 2 to have lfc but otherwise they're correct.

[@salemgiath8150]

Dude no offense, I love your videos and all. But if you don’t have the budget for a proper comparison video, don’t make one. This video was so scuffed and should’ve never been uploaded..

[@jordanmackay6746]

Cheap Korean budget Freesync monitor vs Dell G-sync monitor and your surprised there is ghosting? Come on your better than this.

[@samuelkdu]

what did you expect people choose freesync cause its found in cheap korean budget monitors if you havent noticed most amd fan boys are poor

[@sickbailey21]

@@samuelkdu what? If you are comparing two technologies, apples to apples, you compare two monitors with the same base panels. its not rocket science bro. You don't compare a $200 and $500 monitor like that.

[@salemgiath8150]

Samuel Du FreeSync is also included in high end top quality monitors. Are you drunk?

[@Kathdath]

Samuel Du I went Freesync path because it was supported by consoles and TVs.

[@jordanmackay6746]

@@samuelkdu or we have save money from buying an amd graphics card to put more money into the display

[@zergtoss1]

Man one thing about these tests is even same model monitors can vary lol

[@sickbailey21]

would have been a good start to use the same base monitor or at least panels for this comparison. These freesync vs gsync videos they keep doing are all over the place

[@pedjakrcedinac3485]

You wouldn't have screen tearing below 50 fps on free-sync, because you have LFC. Also, capping FPS at 142 is probably not low enough for free-sync as frames will spike above 144. Not sure if you are using in-game frame-cap or riva-tuner, but either way neither is accurate

[@crimson1718]

How can fps reach 144 if it's CAPPED at 142? 🤣

[@beanos2287]

@@crimson1718 The frame rate can actually spike above the framerate cap, which is why it's generally recommended that you cap your fps a few frames below your monitor's refresh rate.

[@RedPill780]

@@beanos2287If your "cap" can be broken, it's not a cap. 🤣

[@beanos2287]

@@RedPill780 well, it's called a framerate cap, but it isn't always stable.

[@northwood201005]

I use the Free-sync version of the 21:9 Predator X34 (bought it a few years back thinking AMD would put out a card to compete with Nvidia in the upper range; not knowing Nvidia would open up G-sync before that happened.......) to save about $340 over the G-sync version at the time. Even though this panel isn't "certified" it has made a world of difference and the range is really good (40-75fps at 3440x1440).

[@atchmon902]

I went with the same monitor but with gsync. I thought it also wasnt certified, and just "compatible" Just bought a new 7900 xtx and am being reminded how bad screen tearing is.

[@polidoumhd9592]

2 different panels... ofc he will say the brightness is higher or something else bc of the different monitors

[@Jacob-jz2rm]

5:00 for when they start playing

[@syko846]

MVP

[@TechWithSean]

🙏🙏🙏

[@AlexLionson]

It's a panel refresh rate difference and not adaptive sync implementation. But yes, if the price difference is small in this case you can for for g-sync one because it has better panel.

[@RuthlessFares]

I've actually found freesync to work better than the g-sync one i bought, both on the same system with nvidia gpu. That's comparing explicitly tearing and sync properties, not quality of panels. 34gk950f , freaking amazing monitor: 3440x1440, 144hz, "HDR", freesync. Make sure it's the freesync version, up to 144hz vs 120hz on the gsync model. Also, freesync works amazing with nvidia gpus. The freesync blew the water out of the PG348q g-sync

[@mks2184]

My question my sound stupid since i am not an expert but if you use nvidia's gsync on a freesync panel does it work equaly-better-worse than an AMDgpu+Freesync monitor ? I am asking this because amd gpu+ freesync monitor is hardware related and nvidiagpu+freesync is software ?

[@RuthlessFares]

@@mks2184 well typically it depends on the panel in most cases. Though the approved panels by nvidia should absolutely function just as good or close enough. It can in many cases work "equally" as good. Ironically for me though, my 34gk950f freesync display worked better with the g-sync software than the pg348q g-sync display. As long as you check reviews or comments about a display and if it works well with the nvidia g-sync software, it usually wont matter to be honest. If there is a difference, its usually highly negligible. Do make sure to check the free-sync range vs g-sync range on the hardware model relative to your GPU strength and fps you play at, where this is typically the only difference that will matter.

[@RuthlessFares]

The only reasonable situation that would apply to your case, about an amd gpu performing better with a freesync display than the nvidia software, would be if you're buying a monitor/panel that is off-brand, unknown, or known to not function too well with nvidia software. Otherwise, if it's reviewed or commentators say it works well, it's honestly probably not gonna matter. Go with freesync if the panel you want is of that variation. I personally have had a better experience with freesync on nvidia than their supposedly superior g-sync modules. It works well. If you're deciding this based on GPU, just get the GPU that you really want and get a panel that's known to work well with both gpus.

[@RuthlessFares]

It's not that deep bro ;)

[@mks2184]

@@RuthlessFares Thanks for your answer mate, much appreciated

[@jkd7799Yann]

you forgot enhanced sync, it does also help against screen tearing

[@louis.bodota]

It helps with latency when you push more frames than the frequency of the panel. FreeSync is the one that helps against screen tearing. FreeSync 2 allows you to enable both Enhanced Sync and FreeSync.

[@jkd7799Yann]

@@louis.bodota i have freesync one with LFC and both enhanced sync and freesync are enabled in the driver...

[@louis.bodota]

@@jkd7799Yann Yeah, my bad. FreeSync 1 works with Enhanced Sync as well.

[@gerarddeboer8599]

This comparison makes absolutely no sense... you should have bought two of the same monitors but one specifically made for g-sync and the other for FreeSync. MSI, for example, has many sets of those... very flawed comparison. By the way, ghosting doesn't have to do with sync technology, but with the screens' ability to refresh its pixels lmao

[@relevance4890]

I have had that Dell monitor for 3+ years and its is PERFECT. I play R6 Siege competitively and this monitor was my first jump from 1080p to 1440p and from 60Hz to 144Hz and it was an incredible difference. Also the Dell monitor offers 4 USB 3.0 ports and 2 of them are quick charge ready. Such an amazing value for 400. If you are reading this and the monitor is 599.99 USD just wait as it goes on sale for 380 USD.

[@Luredreier]

3:07 No it is *NOT* "better". Freesync and G-sync each have different advantages and disadvantages *other* then just cost, I'm talking features here. What you can say is that certain *implementations* of G-sync is better then certain *implementations* of freesync. But G-sync is really just ahead when Nvidia has released a new G-sync module lately. They don't always do so though. And when it's been a while since last time the other scaler manufacturers catch up in freesync features and even passes the G-sync module in a lot of ways. Advantages are often things like slightly lower latency (except when Nvidia has recently played catch up), more connectivity (except when Nvidia has recently played catch up) and so one and so forth. As for the monitors that objectively give you a worse experience then G-sync those are so cheap that they're not *competing* with G-sync at all but with the monitors with *no* adaptive sync at all. And a *bad* freesync implementation is still superior to no adaptive sync even if it might not be on par with a good freesync or g-sync implementation. Anyway, remember that there are multiple scaler manufacturers that provides freesync support in their modules, and some of them are on par with G-sync already and others haven't quite figured out this whole adaptive sync thing yet and are miles behind G-sync, and some are occasionally ahead of G-sync (although Nvidia has done a good job of never allowing them to stay ahead for long). 3:46 That has *nothing* to do with what is "better" or not. What you're describing is the qualification standard. That is what Freesync 2 offers if you care about that kind of stuff. As well as LFC support for Freesync 1 monitors. It's as simple as going to AMDs website and looking up "LFC" in the list of compatible monitors. Monitors *without* LFC are not competing with G-sync monitors at all, they're all either competing with no-adaptive sync monitors (and are therefore way, way cheaper and *intentionally* using a worse and therefore cheaper implementation of freesync) or they're resolutions and aspect ratios that G-sync don't offer. Either way the scaler manufacturers are trying to find ways to differentiate themselves and to be competitive with Nvidias scaler. This isn't some kind of one sided this is *always* better then the alternatives issue. Realtek scalers have *some* advantages and some *disadvantages* vs Nvidias G-sync depending on the particular products you're comparing. MStar scalers has certain *other* advantages then either of the other two and also disadvantages. Same with Novatek scalers. This is engineering we're talking about here. And engineering *always* involves trade offs. And here each of them (Nvidia, Realtek, Novatek and MStar) brings different things to the table for the monitor manufacturers to take into consideration and in many cases you'll get a *better* experience with the Freesync alternatives as a end user. Yet you claim that Freesync is somehow inferior because AMD *deliberately* gave people the choice to buy cheaper implementations that does not fulfill any standards like LFC support or Freesync 2? Like seriously? We're computer enthusiast here. Anyone who don't know what LFC support is or Freesync 2 is probably don't know what adaptive sync is to start with making this point moth or are just bad at researching computer parts and buy prebuilt. Or they're Nvidia shills who don't *care* about researching AMD stuff. As for recommendations to newbies building computers just tell them to buy Freesync 2 or Freesync 1 with LFC support and *not* without if they're sensitive to tearing. Or tell them to buy freesync and save them some money without having to argue with them about why this "freesync" thing is actually worth spending money on vs a monitor without any kind of adaptive sync at all since they quite frankly probably don't even know what tearing *is* at that point...

[@topbanana4013]

AMD fan go back to bed

[@Luredreier]

@@topbanana4013 This has little to nothing to do with being a fan of anything. The video is simply misleading as it's mixing up differences in implementations and differences in the actual quality of the technology and because it mixes up the technology itself with the certification standards involved.

[@topbanana4013]

@@Luredreier I did so much research on this before spending allot of cash everywhere I go they all say g sync is superior I only here different from comments made by the AMD fan club though but true

[@jazzahazza422]

@@Luredreier damn write my essay for me

[@gt362gamer]

@@topbanana4013 How so?

[@TheNiteNinja19]

Dell makes really nice monitors, not using Dell for both tests is kinda unfair. I never heard of the brand on the right. Nice attempt though, but you can't go wrong with either Freesync or G-sync. Just get what matches your card.

[@easyebs5841]

Andrew Hunt sad part is is that price is a big commitment to graphic card brand once you get that monitor . We need a free sync/ g sync monitor that works with both gpus

[@TheNiteNinja19]

@@easyebs5841 With Nvidia finally coming to their senses, any Freesync monitor will also work with Gsync. But only over DisplayPort

[@georgeindestructible]

I have no idea why but i can see the monitors being so smooth(especially the left) even from this 60 FPS source. The motion looks so....not blurry it makes you wanna cry..

[@PierrePutter]

You should do a side by side like this comparing free sync monitor with a AMD card and a free sync monitor with a nvidia card.(offcourse using the adaptive sync feature in the nvidia control panel)

[@Tallnerdyguy]

It would be a much better test....

[@justspaztik]

You forgot about LFC on FreeSync with AMD. The monitor can go below the freesync range, because then it just doubles frames up. Say you drop to 40fps, it will change the monitor to 80hz and show each frame twice. Also, did you cap the frame rate as to make sure you're not going over the max refresh?

[@echuckiwi419]

Thank you for using Steelseries gear, they don't get enough love

[@CitizenTechTalk]

You should have used two of the same brand and model monitors (not literally obviously). One with G-sync and one with Free sync (proper compatible one). That way quality of panel as you said would then offer a more comparable experience yeah?

[@huzaifavawda8383]

That TN Panel on the Dell is Leagues ahead of the VA panel on the Mecer!!! LGs VA panels will tell a different story

[@JocaGod]

newer nvidia cards also prevent tearing above the monitor refresh rate it's called Fast sync edit: G sync and free sync prevents stuttering on the range of the monitor, tearing is only when the fps is higher than monitor hz

[@Top-Lip]

Gsync is better than Freesync for PvP, it's not so much a visual feedback difference necessarily, rather one of input delay reduction, but this comparison uses different monitors so it's not the best way to test this out. It would be better to do this type of testing on a monitor that supports both Freesync and Gsync.

[@Hectorscarclub13]

I own that exact dell monitor which is known to have ghosting problems, turning overdrive to medium helps or turning the nvidia settings to ULTRA LOW MOTION! but that means turning sync off!

[@HomeworkRadio]

"Friends"

[@Pepperdei]

no one commented on this, big F

[@bensurendra7652]

i would suggest to change title to G-sync vs FreeSync.. to sync with your actual video left and right sides. appreciate it. nice video. !!

[@DerBarde2012]

Good Video to gather information - thanks!

[@gabry_delle]

G sync is better but much expensive.

[@hamzabinamin123]

You guys should have gotten the free sync version of dell for the comparison. It’s called the S2716DGF.

[@zenoen]

The point of this video was Free sync tech vs Adaptive Sync tech and what we got was There basically the same just one is cheaper and the other makes sure you have a decent display with a minimum standard and a small Hardware piece...... We already knew this. Nivida just wanted extra money and were greedy. Pick the display to match your future Graphics card and be done with it. Or get a TV with adaptive sync for your display and then you have to get an AMD card anyway because Nivida will not support HDMI Adaptive Sync.

[@noah5183]

My freesync monitor is gsync compatible.

[@Nianfur]

Terrible comparison. Re-do it with identical panels with Freesync and G-sync. Maybe get a couple of Acer monitors.

[@carringbushpet]

THe other major factor in choosing between free-sync and G-sync is that Nvidia cards 10 series and up have free-sync support. so if you're still rocking an extremely beefy and relevant 900 series card like my beautiful 980 Ti Hybrid then it's only G-Sync for us. In this regard I am happy that the choice is somewhat made for me :)

[@alexalden5249]

G sync vs g sync compatible?

[@themedleb]

Yeah, instead he should write something like "G-Sync monitors that are Freesync compatible".

[@YouNoub1]

Should've had a 3rd party setting up the pc without telling which is which so that there is no bias/placebo effect

[@turker9658]

Who is the better

[@melvinhans1844]

Haven’t watched, (my guess) Might make a small difference if you are on a true g sync monitor with the module vs just a g sync capable monitor (adaptive/freesync monitor). But I doubt you can tell the difference, I just switched from an 570 to a 1070 and my monitor doesn’t “officially” support adaptive sync but it works fine. Both freesync and adaptive sync worked well for me. I only had issues when I used a different resolution second monitor and it would bug out occasionally.

[@ryovcp]

I don't understand this video. You are using 2 different monitors wich have different panels. The freesync monitor looks way cheaper...

[@dimintordevil7186]

dude , if you get ghosting , then the monitor actually can not process 144hz because of grey to grey (thingy ). you should try locking your frames a little bit lower . in most cases , monitors advertised as 144hz can only display something like 120hz . so if you lock your fps even lower , like 110 or maybe 100 or 90 , you might not get ghosting . Besides , does the ghosting appear only when you turn on freesync at 133 fps or not ? you need to test more . this video does not provide enough info

[@KindOldRaven]

LFC can be enabled on many Freesync monitors using CRU.

[@krasi4a]

Can be desabled with CRU?

[@Frostblitz20]

I want that AMD background

[@I3ordo]

so g-sync works on free-sync but quality of the panel matters as well. You wont get tearing vysnc off or dropped frames with vsync on but you might get annoyed about the blurry ghosting because of the an inferior panel.

[@KaitlynFedrick]

G-Sync vs Freesync comparison: > Uses different monitors > Uses different performing GPUs > Isn't aware that Freesync support lower framrate compensation now > Blames shitty panels on Freesync. FFS dude this isn't hard. An actually fair comparison and doing some research shouldn't be a problem

[@amsunaakage]

Curious about the type of camera used in recording this video, and type of lens as well, it would be great if you would make us a video about your gearset. Love your content, keep up the good work. Edit: With some tweaking, your video quality could be a lot better. (i.e isolating background, blurring ,etc.)

[@richardsamanthajones5476]

As always informative and entertaining Thank you @🇨🇦

[@nilschristianhalvorsen5386]

Wouldn't Freesync 2 be more relevant these days?😅

[@tylerpenn545]

Low framerate Compensation works on freesync too. So if you drop below the range you won’t get tearing.

[@zergtoss1]

But you forgot to include your control... a 250hz 1080p without using either :-)

[@mcnacho6096]

if you set up your nvidia setting rigjt up, then you dont need a g sync Monitor 16x fxaa on gamma on tripple off mfaa on shadercache on lod clamp trilineare off v sync for 3d games no problems with that on a 60 hz ips stable 60 fps without fragments

[@formtek1]

You guys should test these in lower and more unstable fps, not only in 143 fps rate. That's where you would notice difference.

[@Trugoy1000]

I'm confused (nothing new btw), but are we comparing freesync vs gysnc or are we comparing those 2 monitors?? You blur the line between these two extremes to the point of invalidating your conclusions.

[@greybuckleton]

You should have adjusted the monitors overdrive feature to reduce the ghosting. Did you actually make the monitors have similar settings?

[@giovannip.1433]

There's a $500 graphics card difference and the freesync monitor is not as expensive- or good - as the gsync monitor. If money is no object then Intel, Nvidia and Gsync is the way to go for 'pro gamers. For people who have to feed their kids, want to go on a holiday, paying a mortgage then Saving $1000+ Going AMD is a clear option.

[@Arvi_The_Clown]

Are there these two wallpapers maybe in 4k ?

[@Chemy.]

So basically not really a problem which one you get

[@julianbilderbeek583]

Ryzen FTW, Noti squad btw!!

[@markdavenportjr5129]

yep I also went with Ryzen because of the intel bugs intel just keeps on getting lol!

[@Snowbikebro2]

yeah my 144 hz freesync monitor don't ghost like that.

[@jkd7799Yann]

same

[@quietspcs9336]

That was a great Video, exactly what I was looking for 👌👌👌

[@Mrlultime]

The comparison is flawed, but the information is correct. Watch the full video.

[@cornspring5842]

And almost pro esport gamers never turn on gsync or freesynce in their high refresh rate monitor !?

[@ryan-we1ml]

g-sync is good on all monitor because every monitor with G-sync is expensive as heck,but freesync monitors cover all price points.

[@levitrap5192]

I'm not sure this is true, but I heard that nvidia made it where even if the monitor is a free sync monitor, g sync will still be enabled for it. Could someone please verify this?

[@ethandunne7869]

Nope

[@ALT3PFL3G3R]

i am not mad that the 650€ (germany) card lost to a 1000€ (also germany) card, and yes i know its about the pannel, but price difference in the monitor is still 100 €. so budget high performance is AMD and BALLz 2 the WALLz is Nvida + INTEL. i like both because i love gaming , 1440p gsyc HP Omen with a 6600k and a 1070 GTX and 32gig of ram. but it was more bang at the time (2 years) ago, right now i would wait 4 navi and Ryzen 3000 .

[@doozeschanyt9554]

4:52 active at all TAAAAYYYMMMES lol why he say it like that haha

[@wesleyvonk8611]

ghosting looks worse on the freesync monitor cause the higher frame rate make it look less noticeable cause it gets updated faster to disappear.

[@theoneyoudontsee8315]

well if the panel ghosts there is a problem with that and you cant test!

[@megamind8359]

I like amd but gysync for 100 dollar + you are secure that will work at any range so after one or two years when the big games lauch i dont have to dip down the graphics to match the fps with the monitor refresh rate

[@bluereino]

Should’ve done a blind test so they don’t know which ones which.

[@yonatangoldin]

hi, I don't have wallpaper engine and i want to download the amd wallpaper and idk how, can someone help me pls?

[@dgraves14]

that's the same Dell Gsync monitor that I'm using right now. Idk, at least my Dell S2716DG isn't all that great. I'm constantly having problems with the gsync being broken. And many times it seems like Gsync isn't even working. I still get choppy frames from time to time.

[@capitaocristalicio2811]

Question of the month: Its beneficial for csgo a freesync 75hz monitor when i have 300-400fps ingame?

[@henrycoversguitar]

Those wallpapers are rad.

[@lashyndragon]

Would be nice to see some lower end graphics cards using G-sync's native sub-50hz support vs freesync's LFC (frame doubling) Unless g-sync doubles frames too, I'm not sure

[@timotejglonec4146]

bro you have been hacked time 0:09 left monitor im not kidding

[@ChineyTNT]

can soome one tell me how to get these wall paper i clicked the link but im unsure what i do next.. do i need to pay

[@emiliolucero9294]

you do, you have to buy wallpaper engine on steam, but the wallpapers themselves are free

[@BennyJoyTV]

I thought with g sync you don’t have to cap the FPS

[@Devilman666]

With v sync on you don't. I know, it's weird.

[@lashyndragon]

Uncapped + fast sync ftw

[@BennyJoyTV]

Diablosis v sync is capping it. I own a g sync monitor. And right when I got it I searched this up and they said you don’t need v sync on. Cause for a while I was playing with v sync and g sync on. With v sync off I saw no difference.

[@sqorchhcbriot3542]

Next time please use the same monitor like the Alienware monitor free sync vs the g sync version I’m 100% sure it will make a difference and be more. Accurate

[@adfggffffffddffd]

So they perform exactly the same and G-sync is just a rip off that Nvidia came up with. Not surprisingly either since the bang for buck for their cards is also not as good as AMD cards. Nvidia only wins with their high end cards like the 2080 ti and the Titan, however those are horrible in terms of price performance but you'll find that the price to performance ratio basically always goes down the higher up in performance you get with ANYTHING. Look at cars for example. You can get a hatch back for $15k but to get a car that goes twice as fast you're going to have to pay at least 3x as much. If you want a car that goes 3x as fast you're going to have to pay 10x as much (at least).

[@hewitttt]

Even if the panels arent the ones you wanted the tests were cool and the PC you built is LEGENDARY. Wootware needs to start carrying alienware monitors :)

[@muhammadal-hiyari5239]

the 60 fps is great keep it up

[@HD7970]

im about to get internet soon and im excited because it will be the fastest internet that ive had buuuuut theres a catch 100 dollars a month

[@xxminecraftlegendarxx6804]

Big oof over the price

[@daniellundin8543]

Thx for the video. Q: Does Freesync have a dedicated hardware chip like Gsync has with Gsync Ultimate?

[@ArquelCudia_xAMTCx]

Is those 2 monitors connected to 1 computer while playing at the same time!?!?!?

[@GrimAbstract]

No there’s two PCs. One on top other on bottom

[@liyonjin8653]

Same tech with a different badge and naming scheme, so do you like the colour red or green?

[@fthis1234567]

even i can instantly tell the gsync is one is better in motion/smoothness...

[@a.ffirmative]

But is there a Ryzen and Nvidia wallpapaer tho

[@jamesshaw3151]

Where can i get backrounds like that for a desktop?

[@sorenvitarelli]

Your conclusion was gsync can be worth it because you spend the $100 more and get a better panel. What if I spent that extra $100 on a freesync panel? Am I getting a better panel than the Gsync monitor then? I think it would be a cool follow up.

[@sorenvitarelli]

​@IVAN NEGA What? one of them is a Gsync monitor the other is a Freesync monitor. Neither of the monitors exhibited tearing. The Gsync monitor had a higher quality panel than the Freesync monitor and exhibited less ghosting. Ghosting has nothing to do with Gsync or Freesync, it is caused by pixel response time.

[@sebastianschafer9532]

Name of the desk?

[@Yurie13]

TL;DR - both Gsync and FreeSync are kinda same.. just mind the quality of the monitor.. some FreeSync monitor sucks.. specially at ghosting.. PS: i hate when monitor starts ghosting.. it annoys my eyes.. (my eyes can detect fast movements.. so ghosting really annoys me..)

[@jesalbov]

what keyboard do you use? what about the mouse pad? :) ty

[@louis.bodota]

That Sponsor actually sounds good. Anyone want a $6 a month unlimited storage? Heck yeah.

[@dereklee8713]

Video begins in 2:31