From Tragedy to Triumph | The Record Breaking Fairey Long-Range Monoplane [Aircraft Overview #77]

  Рет қаралды 106,111

Rex's Hangar

Rex's Hangar

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 234
@RexsHangar
@RexsHangar 2 жыл бұрын
F.A.Q Section Q: Do you take aircraft requests? A: I have a list of aircraft I plan to cover, but feel free to add to it with suggestions:) Q: Why do you use imperial measurements for some videos, and metric for others? A: I do this based on country of manufacture. Imperial measurements for Britain and the U.S, metric for the rest of the world, but I include text in my videos that convert it for both. Q: Will you include video footage in your videos, or just photos? A: Video footage is very expensive to licence, if I can find footage in the public domain I will try to use it, but a lot of it is hoarded by licencing studies (British Pathe, Periscope films etc). In the future I may be able to afford clips :) Q: Why do you sometimes feature images/screenshots from flight simulators? A: Sometimes there are not a lot of photos available for certain aircraft, so I substitute this with digital images that are as accurate as possible. Feel free to leave you questions below - I may not be able to answer all of them, but I will keep my eyes open :)
@aszneetish2801
@aszneetish2801 2 жыл бұрын
I Don't know If you've covered it, but a video on the de Havilland tiger moth would be great
@akmzd6938
@akmzd6938 2 жыл бұрын
Speaking of requests and record-breaking, how about a video on the Macchi M.C.72 that, besides being the most beautiful plane ever made, still holds the speed record for piston-engined seaplanes that it set in 1934?
@squeaksquawk4255
@squeaksquawk4255 2 жыл бұрын
Once again requesting the Heinkel He162
@tombarton4410
@tombarton4410 2 жыл бұрын
Could you cover the Handley Page H.p42/45?
@ME262MKI
@ME262MKI 2 жыл бұрын
Wish you can cover the design and functioning of aircraft carburetors and fuel pumps, specially the ones designed for combat aircraft
@lakrids-pibe
@lakrids-pibe 2 жыл бұрын
Fairly Long-Range Monoplane
@mastathrash5609
@mastathrash5609 2 жыл бұрын
It is a pretty long boi, sleek though
@daveyoder9231
@daveyoder9231 2 жыл бұрын
Boo. Hiss.
@allandavis8201
@allandavis8201 2 жыл бұрын
I sincerely hope that your comment was an attempt at humour. But in case it wasn’t, in the late 20s early 30s 5000+ miles was an extremely long way in addition to the first non-stop from the United Kingdom 🇬🇧 to India 🇮🇳 was a superb triumph and achievement. 😀👍🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇺🇦
@NICOLAI_VET
@NICOLAI_VET 2 жыл бұрын
BADUM-TSS🤣
@maximiliankoch2593
@maximiliankoch2593 2 жыл бұрын
@@allandavis8201 thank you Allan
@MediumRareOpinions
@MediumRareOpinions 2 жыл бұрын
I want to express how much I enjoy this channels in depth coverage of the early period of aviation advancement, an era which I feel isn't given as much attention as it deserves.
@Emdee5632
@Emdee5632 2 жыл бұрын
There is always something clumsy or awkward about these interwar designs. They are starting to look like the airplanes of WW2 but at the same time many of them still look as if they are disguised WW1 designs. I guess in the future people will think the same about our present aircraft designs. Please keep making more of these videos, Rex's Hangar!
@papalegba6796
@papalegba6796 2 жыл бұрын
Aircraft design has barely changed for 30 years, since CAD was introduced, & will not change at all in future. It is at a technical limit.
@Sacto1654
@Sacto1654 2 жыл бұрын
It was only in the 1930's that the monocoque structural design--first developed before World War I--became commonplace in airplane design. The Douglas DC-1 to DC-3 of the 1930's were among the first widely used planes to take advantage of this.
@L0stEngineer
@L0stEngineer 2 жыл бұрын
Clumsy? Why sir, they had Moxy! Without carbon glass and turbines, these girls look like they had glad rags on and were out for a jaunt in the sky.
@L0stEngineer
@L0stEngineer 2 жыл бұрын
@@papalegba6796 those angry bees electric manned drones want to have a word with you.
@papalegba6796
@papalegba6796 2 жыл бұрын
Nope. Only the control systems have changed, aerodynamically there is no improvement possible, the same designs would have been made last century.
@steveneldred8928
@steveneldred8928 2 жыл бұрын
Rex, I can't begin to express how much I appreciate what you are doing here. When I was a young kid here in Battle Creek Michigan, there were two aircraft setting idle outside a hangar for years; I kind of grew up looking at them. One was a B-25 Mitchell and the other a Beechcraft Model 18 (my favorite airplane ever). I don't know what became of the Beechcraft, but one summer day when I was in my mid 40's I saw the B-25 fly overhead. Someone in Detroit had bought it and flew it away. I've loved vintage aircraft most of my life and have always about knocked down the door to get outside when I hear a radial engine. Now, at 75, I'm thrilled to watch your videos. Your knowledge of the aircraft, the construct of your videos, and even your presentation are phenomenal. Thanks a million!
@charlestonianbuilder344
@charlestonianbuilder344 2 жыл бұрын
I love the 20min videos as they are short enough to digest, and long enough to get alot of details too
@pencilpauli9442
@pencilpauli9442 2 жыл бұрын
If this was a "rough cut" I can't say I noticed. Thought it was 1st rate. Made me think that there could plenty of material in inter war record breaking aircraft to keep a KZbin channel going for a good while!
@jillatherton4660
@jillatherton4660 2 жыл бұрын
Nicely proportioned with sweet lines, I wonder how a small rubber-band version might perform.
@stevendombrosky2842
@stevendombrosky2842 2 жыл бұрын
I was actually thinking about building an R/C version myself. Very cool and great looking plane
@aerotube7291
@aerotube7291 2 жыл бұрын
Likely abandoned after a short distance due to declining power output🤣
@daszieher
@daszieher 2 жыл бұрын
Build it! 😃
@lukeskywalket2894
@lukeskywalket2894 2 жыл бұрын
If you could cover the F7F Tigercat, that'd be pretty cool cause it's an aircraft that really doesn't get talked about much, if at all
@davidmurphy8190
@davidmurphy8190 2 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@jeffbird2983
@jeffbird2983 2 жыл бұрын
I really like learning about airplanes that I didn't know existed. This was another of you great videos. Thanks for making it.
@FandersonUfo
@FandersonUfo 2 жыл бұрын
more high quality content - ty RH
@kirkmooneyham
@kirkmooneyham 2 жыл бұрын
That is the EXACT sort of aircraft that should not have been scrapped. One of a kind, it should have been warehoused for posterity. I understand the thought process on these things was different at the time, but still, sort of mildly tragic anyway.
@nickthompson9697
@nickthompson9697 2 жыл бұрын
What a great way to start my day!
@SirWilliamKidney
@SirWilliamKidney 2 жыл бұрын
Congrats on the 100k subs! Also great video as always!
@Bearthedancingman
@Bearthedancingman 2 жыл бұрын
I would enjoy a history overview of the "range wars". So many interesting aircraft.
@JosephArata
@JosephArata 2 жыл бұрын
Large aircraft, basically the size of a small WW2 bomber, massive monoplane wing with a fairly inefficient gasoline engine in most cases. Very weird time to be in aviation, for sure. Really efficient air frame designs for the amount of lift they could create based off their current knowledge. But the engines of that time period are just objectively garbage. We didn't really see any decent gasoline engines till the start/midpoint of WW2 when engineers had to start solving real problems.
@sydecarnutz972
@sydecarnutz972 2 жыл бұрын
Very sad that this one wasn't preserved! Great presentation! Thank you.
@None-zc5vg
@None-zc5vg 2 жыл бұрын
They never even tried to save a single 'Halifax' bomber and the solitary post-war preserved British Hampden airframe was scrapped in time.
@papalegba6796
@papalegba6796 2 жыл бұрын
The Halifax was a hated deathtrap & deserved to be scrapped. The Hampden was much liked by pilots, but didn't carry enough bombs so was replaced by horrid 4 engine deathtraps. That pilots hated.
@k3D4rsi554maq
@k3D4rsi554maq 2 жыл бұрын
Indeed!
@philpique3187
@philpique3187 2 жыл бұрын
Rushed perhaps, but another wonderfully produced and narrated video on a fascinating aircraft which deserves note. Thank you so much for your efforts -well done!
@VictoryAviation
@VictoryAviation 2 жыл бұрын
Over the last few years, I've become obsessed with endurance flights. Just a few hours ago I gave an in person presentation about the longest endurance flight (with refueling) that still stands to this day, a mere 63 years later. Thank you so much for this fantastically researched and produced video. You've got another subscriber!
@davidvavra9113
@davidvavra9113 2 жыл бұрын
Just starting the video, those initial specifications surprised me. A total weight of 16,000 pounds, gasoline weighs about 6 pounds per gallon and it was intended to carry a thousand gallons. So. 6,000 of the 16,000 in total weight as fuel is impressive.
@birlyballop4704
@birlyballop4704 2 жыл бұрын
An Imperial gallon of gasoline weighs 7.2 lbs, so total fuel was about 7200 lbs, 3 Imp tons, approx 3000 kg.
@ngauruhoezodiac3143
@ngauruhoezodiac3143 2 жыл бұрын
It is an English airplane so it would use Imperial gallons (5,65 litre) instead of American gallons (3;78 litre) so 1000 gallons would weigh 3.2 tons.
@dantupper1784
@dantupper1784 2 жыл бұрын
Then add in the weight of all the in-wing tanks, lines, valving, fuselage tank, slipstream-driven backup pump- Over 40% of take-off weight. Wow.
@vumba1331
@vumba1331 2 жыл бұрын
1 Imperial gallon is 4.545 litres.
@unclenogbad1509
@unclenogbad1509 Жыл бұрын
Great example of a plane that looks ready to do what it was designed for. Thanks for another good vid, cheers.
@Steve-GM0HUU
@Steve-GM0HUU 2 жыл бұрын
Full load take off completed just 4 days before record attempt! They didn't mess about in those days. I was intrigued to know more about Flt Lt Major (e.g. how he came to be an experienced navigator). However, a quick search showed nothing.
@paulhaynes8045
@paulhaynes8045 2 жыл бұрын
I so wanted him to be promoted to Major! Almost Catch-22...
@Calligraphybooster
@Calligraphybooster 2 жыл бұрын
@@paulhaynes8045 and very ‘Flying High’ (Airplane!)
@shoominati23
@shoominati23 2 жыл бұрын
I guess that they must have lacked the materials to build a wing as thin and narrow as is on the U-2 Spyplane (as opposed to the once-passable Band) then they might have been capable of remaining aloft for many more hours with the great lift and fuel economy! I guess the lack of retracting undercarriage is because that would cut into fuel storage space (in the wing) , and probably more likely is that in those early days of Aviation, well managed paved runways were few and far between - with the Farmer's Field being the usual wilderness airfield (and you never knew how rutted and rocky that might be)
@daszieher
@daszieher 2 жыл бұрын
Which is why they often found themselves stuck to a hillside. At least perceivably more often than nowadays.
@johnnoble01
@johnnoble01 2 жыл бұрын
I remember back in the 80's a bloke called Dave Chinnery designed one of these in the early days of electric model flight. Apparently it was a good performer no doubt due to the high aspect ratio wing and the fairly clean airframe.
@realityquotient7699
@realityquotient7699 2 жыл бұрын
I'd never heard of this craft. What a beauty she is and a perfect subject for modelling!
@Ken-fw9dh
@Ken-fw9dh 2 жыл бұрын
I modeled it in 2003 as an electric powered free-flight and it was an outstanding flyer, with many great flights both stable and reliable until it came off the worst, flying itself into a brick wall.
@GSimpsonOAM
@GSimpsonOAM 2 жыл бұрын
@@Ken-fw9dh Re-enacting the Tunisian incident?
@Perktube1
@Perktube1 2 жыл бұрын
Could be worth a Docudrama imo. Imagine the scene while in transit. One person flying, the other pouring over charts, or sleeping in the foldable bed. What did they eat, how was it packed, and did they have provision for tea? 😁
@SuperLancevancedance
@SuperLancevancedance 2 жыл бұрын
o7 nice video rex, as usual
@lakrids-pibe
@lakrids-pibe 2 жыл бұрын
What kind of bathroom facilities would they have on those long range flights? A little bucket with a lid and sawdust? Would they open the door and squad down over the sideboard?
@mpetersen6
@mpetersen6 2 жыл бұрын
Bombs away! I read an account one time of an RAF crew man who took the opportunity to relieve himself over a target in Germany once the RAF started flying during the day late in the war. True? I have no idea.
@maryclarafjare
@maryclarafjare 2 жыл бұрын
This was fascinating, and the plane really was neat looking. Thanks for another great video!
@jonathan_60503
@jonathan_60503 2 жыл бұрын
Very interesting. Now I'd love to see some overview videos of the various range/speed/altitude prize races during this era. What country and manufacturers were working on designs for each and whether they did succeed in taking the record. (And then obviously that demands follow-on, more in depth, videos on each design). Where there any that hit their design goals but yet didn't get to claim the record; because another better plane snagged it first?
@ivoryjohnson4662
@ivoryjohnson4662 2 жыл бұрын
Excellent commentary I look forward to each production
@ianbell5611
@ianbell5611 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you. Enjoyable and informative despite it being rushed. Cheers
@migueldelacruz4799
@migueldelacruz4799 2 жыл бұрын
Body panels of a Ju-52, landing gears of Fi-156, stretched main wings from a Lockheed Vega, enlarged tail assembly of a D-VII, and the end product looks like a weird interwar Pc-6. I love it!
@tomt373
@tomt373 2 жыл бұрын
Just how the hell do you compare this airplane's tail assembly with the comma-shaped rudder and the counter-balanced elevator tail controls of Fokker's D-VII as well as this airplane's body panels being ROUNDED unlike the straight/slab-sided Ju-52's??
@migueldelacruz4799
@migueldelacruz4799 2 жыл бұрын
@@tomt373 I must have my ww1 Fokkers confused and the body panels I was talking about was not the shape but by the material it is made of. Heavily corrugated aluminum panels.
@alaingadbois2276
@alaingadbois2276 2 жыл бұрын
@@migueldelacruz4799 The Fairey had a fabric covered fuselage, not corrugated aluminium.
@guaporeturns9472
@guaporeturns9472 2 жыл бұрын
This thing is awesome. Thanks again for great content
@markpatterson4917
@markpatterson4917 2 жыл бұрын
Nothing rough about this video at all. It was as ever slick and very interesting.
@167curly
@167curly 10 ай бұрын
Thank you for that very interesting talk.
@arno-luyendijk4798
@arno-luyendijk4798 2 жыл бұрын
Interesting. I have seen this aircraft for the first time in a Biggles comic book, where, of course, the prototype was flewn by Biggles, Algy and Ginger, and later stolen by BIggles big adversary Von Stalhein. The streamlining and relatively big shape in relation to 1 engine already struck me then, this is the first time I saw pictures of its variants and flights. Beautiful aircraft.
@jasonz7788
@jasonz7788 2 жыл бұрын
Great work Mr Rex thank you
@garylawson5381
@garylawson5381 2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for another great documentary video Rex's Hangar!
@karoltakisobie6638
@karoltakisobie6638 2 жыл бұрын
Vickers Wellesley was used for records flight and not just one but few of them. Would love to hear that story.
@papalegba6796
@papalegba6796 2 жыл бұрын
Retractable undercarriage helped a lot, as did geodesic airframe.
@stevetournay6103
@stevetournay6103 2 жыл бұрын
There's an Ed Nash video on the Wellesley...
@davidmurphy8190
@davidmurphy8190 2 жыл бұрын
This aircraft was used as the mythical plane used in the 1933 book “Lost Horizon”. Check it out.
@paulhaynes8045
@paulhaynes8045 2 жыл бұрын
Nice to see something a little different - very interesting.
@slartibartfast2649
@slartibartfast2649 2 жыл бұрын
A video on the Bristol Type 138 would go very nicely after this.
@SatumangoTheGreat
@SatumangoTheGreat 2 жыл бұрын
The Bristol type 138! I had a model kit of that one, but I could not Google that plane because I had forgotten the name of the manufacturer and what it was called. Thank you!
@tonyraheja1
@tonyraheja1 4 ай бұрын
Very interesting... Thanks
@nikiandre6998
@nikiandre6998 2 жыл бұрын
Love airplanes, and love you vodeos. Different interesting models all the time! Exiting!
@cmdredstrakerofshado1159
@cmdredstrakerofshado1159 2 жыл бұрын
😉your comment at 00:52 of reusing the photos Fairey Long Range Monoplane flash me back to my misspent youth watching Monty Python reruns on Saturday nights on PBS at 12:00 am, "Slide No.1 The Larch" 🤣🤣😉. This another Great video on a forgotten airplane I did not know about till today watch this video👍👍
@brentsummers7377
@brentsummers7377 9 ай бұрын
An impressive looking aircraft. 57 hours to fly from England to South Africa compared to around 2 weeks by a passenger ship in those days.
@tomperkins5657
@tomperkins5657 2 жыл бұрын
Excellent, as usual!
@MarkkuKoljonenwTinja
@MarkkuKoljonenwTinja 2 жыл бұрын
Thanks! :)
@waywardscythe3358
@waywardscythe3358 2 жыл бұрын
CFIT. The weather could also have confused the pilots especially if they were in the clouds. This still happens frequently, unfortunately.
@radomircita9420
@radomircita9420 2 жыл бұрын
I would be very interested in video about Czechoslovak prewar fighter biplane Avia B-534 and possibly assesing its chances against German Luftwaffe in 1938
@Parocha
@Parocha 2 жыл бұрын
I've always found that fighter to be quite beautiful... Almost looks sleek enough that a monoplane version would have been possible with little modification
@emjackson2289
@emjackson2289 2 жыл бұрын
And then they got to fly with the Luftwaffe . . . .
@terryboehler5752
@terryboehler5752 Жыл бұрын
Good job
@douglasjohnson4382
@douglasjohnson4382 2 жыл бұрын
Beautiful craft.
@wideyxyz2271
@wideyxyz2271 2 жыл бұрын
Excellent Rex.... A local company for local people (league of gentlemen reference) Based just up the road from me.
@fredeagle3912
@fredeagle3912 2 жыл бұрын
Next, please do the Bristol high altitude record aeroplane. Good program, subscribed.
@BadByte
@BadByte 2 жыл бұрын
Don’t worry about release days look at KZbinr Ahoy, quality trumps quantity ie. a quality video is worth waiting for
@freeman8128
@freeman8128 2 жыл бұрын
Setting records was something of a diversion from the practical need for the Empire to establish a regular air postal service.
@drstevenrey
@drstevenrey Жыл бұрын
Are these just my wonky eyes or does this thing look quite good. I like the cockpit in the leading edge of the wing. Low, sleek and it does look fast (for the day).
@shoominati23
@shoominati23 2 жыл бұрын
The looks like one of those Savoia Marchetti floatplanes for the Schneider Trophy. I believe there is one of the Catamaran type preserved in South America
@daszieher
@daszieher 2 жыл бұрын
Good to see that you now have so many Wing Commander Tier Patrons that you can no longer read out their names. 😉
@kyle857
@kyle857 2 жыл бұрын
Damn... Damn boy... Damn boy! Look at that wing.
@mochabear88
@mochabear88 2 жыл бұрын
Nice video, will you share the results of this planes successor?
@Justwantahover
@Justwantahover Жыл бұрын
How big was the rubber band?
@flyeurodiesel
@flyeurodiesel 2 жыл бұрын
dont forget ruth nichols. 83hrs in diesel powered stin son in 1931. engine was giberson radial.
@naughtiusmaximus830
@naughtiusmaximus830 2 жыл бұрын
The plane that flew from Moscow to Vancouver is cool. It’s at the Pearson air museum in Vancouver.
@Allan_aka_RocKITEman
@Allan_aka_RocKITEman 2 жыл бұрын
@RexsHangar >>> Great video...👍
@reynaldoandannieangnged6434
@reynaldoandannieangnged6434 2 жыл бұрын
Upon seeing the thumbnail, it reminded me of the antonov an-25. At least for the wings and slim fuselage
@cornevanrooyen4717
@cornevanrooyen4717 Жыл бұрын
Hi .would you consider selling the blueprints of the planes ?
@alexbaxter9512
@alexbaxter9512 2 жыл бұрын
What a pretty aircraft.
@Acidese
@Acidese 2 жыл бұрын
You should do a video about the Aviotehas PN-3 "Isamaa Päästja"
@BunkerFox
@BunkerFox 2 жыл бұрын
What a pretty plane
@ProjectFlashlight612
@ProjectFlashlight612 2 жыл бұрын
See also the Me 261.
@duneydan7993
@duneydan7993 2 жыл бұрын
If one day you're passing by Belgium, you should come visite the Royal Military Museum in Brussels! It has one of the biggest aircraft collection in europe! The sad part is that it's an old museum with a lot of will to modernise but without enough funding. That means old buildings, a lot (a lot, a lot, maybe too much) of pieces but often with little information, a bit dusty... Damn, I actually managed to make me a bit sad writing this.
@stejer211
@stejer211 2 жыл бұрын
I guess you should explain what the connection between Fairey and Belgium is, because most people won't know ;)
@RemusKingOfRome
@RemusKingOfRome 2 жыл бұрын
Ah! the Proto Fairy Battle .. to the joy of all luftwaffe fighter pilots :D
@trooperdgb9722
@trooperdgb9722 5 ай бұрын
Sure, other than the fixed landing gear, the cabin instead of canopy covered cockpit, high wing instead of Low wing... absolutely the same as a Battle. LOL
@MarcWeertsMusic
@MarcWeertsMusic 2 жыл бұрын
Really enjoyed it, totally not a rough video. Have you looked at da vinci resolve as an alternative editor? Very powerful and there's even a free version that just lacks some of the high end fx.
@johnnunn8688
@johnnunn8688 2 жыл бұрын
Very interesting,thank you. It would however have been nice to say which aircraft broke the records, while the Fairey was preparing to break the record, if that makes sense.
@forthwithtx5852
@forthwithtx5852 2 жыл бұрын
Nice lines, in my opinion.
@drstevenrey
@drstevenrey 9 ай бұрын
The fin could be nicer than that, but it still looks good to me.
@DavidBrown-cp2vm
@DavidBrown-cp2vm 2 жыл бұрын
Who needs fiction when real life & it's history is so much more interesting. Yet again, a great video expertly conjured from the mists of aviation antiquity. I think that rubber/plastic pants with strong elastic openings were not well developed then and that fact alone would have counted me out from flying a single engined aircraft to India non-stop. If one of the RAF crew was seen as "not quite right" he was probably better suited to the job than most of us !!
@spartan5157
@spartan5157 2 жыл бұрын
What aircraft is at 0:45?
@Chuckles..
@Chuckles.. 2 жыл бұрын
Very cool looking plane, shame she was scrapped.
@pavelavietor1
@pavelavietor1 2 жыл бұрын
hello i like it 👌 saludos
@RonJohn63
@RonJohn63 2 жыл бұрын
Back up early, back up often.
@K1W1fly
@K1W1fly 2 жыл бұрын
A classic Art Deco aeroplane....
@uingaeoc3905
@uingaeoc3905 2 жыл бұрын
Now what about the Bristol Altitude record 138?
@donlawrence1428
@donlawrence1428 2 жыл бұрын
man, those brits are insidiously persistent!
@fcv1_
@fcv1_ 2 жыл бұрын
I wonder how most of record-setting planes have looked, if this plain(and modern)-looking design of fairey LR is unique while it's Italian competitor - bleriot-zepata isn't.
@puebespuebes8589
@puebespuebes8589 4 ай бұрын
What did pre war designer have with weird tail rudder
@HootOwl513
@HootOwl513 2 жыл бұрын
I imagine Fl Lt Major's distress was from the fact that he wasn't promoted to Major.
@CaptainBanjo-fw4fq
@CaptainBanjo-fw4fq Жыл бұрын
Wow, for a 1920s design, this looks a lot like the fairey planes of WW2.
@JosephArata
@JosephArata 2 жыл бұрын
"Used 15 gallons of oil." Geezus, and I thought modern Gasoline engines were still inefficient junk compared to diesel engines, that's just downright terrible.
@throttleblipsntwistedgrips1992
@throttleblipsntwistedgrips1992 7 ай бұрын
I used to own a 1980 Volare wagon with a slant 6 that had almost half a million miles on it, there was absolutely nothing left of the rings inside the engine and I used to joke with my friends that I got better MPGs out of my gas tank and than the oil pan😂
@jeremysolano398
@jeremysolano398 2 жыл бұрын
Fly LtJenkins upon assignment... : "My name is Leroy sir." Flt Lt Jenkins upon landing " LEEEEEEROY JENKINS!"
@TheLmiksche
@TheLmiksche 2 жыл бұрын
You talk Miles, yet the map was in KM, which one is it then? Thanks
@ronjon7942
@ronjon7942 Жыл бұрын
That's for our modern day benefit. England used Imperial, although it (and the US) defined a mile in units of 5280 English feet, carried through to this day. England officially metricated in 1965 although Imperial is in wide usage; often there's talk of reverting to Imperial. It gets tiring saying, and listening to, both metric and Imperial (and US customary units) in every video, and by now most should be able to do the conversion anyway.
@donjones4719
@donjones4719 2 жыл бұрын
0:34 It looks like giant insects are carrying those planes.
@fogelmclovin6815
@fogelmclovin6815 2 жыл бұрын
So it never delivered any post?
@Bernard-fo2qo
@Bernard-fo2qo 8 ай бұрын
Looks like Lindberghs Spirit of St Louis but larger.
@G7VFY
@G7VFY 2 жыл бұрын
You could imagine a modern version with solar panels on the wings and two, alternate engines, one being electric.
@xdas11
@xdas11 2 жыл бұрын
It's always the awesome looking once that gets scrapped.....
@CaptainBanjo-fw4fq
@CaptainBanjo-fw4fq Жыл бұрын
5:38 He missed his opportunity to become a meme by joining the RAF instead of the Army or Marines 😢
@Rintaro88
@Rintaro88 2 жыл бұрын
posted 17 seconds ago, what luck!
@calvingreene90
@calvingreene90 2 жыл бұрын
You would have thought the RAF could have found a use for it ferrying parts and people around the UK home islands.
Boeing's First "Super Bomber" | Boeing XB-15
20:40
Rex's Hangar
Рет қаралды 98 М.
Don’t Choose The Wrong Box 😱
00:41
Topper Guild
Рет қаралды 62 МЛН
99.9% IMPOSSIBLE
00:24
STORROR
Рет қаралды 31 МЛН
黑天使被操控了#short #angel #clown
00:40
Super Beauty team
Рет қаралды 61 МЛН
BAYGUYSTAN | 1 СЕРИЯ | bayGUYS
36:55
bayGUYS
Рет қаралды 1,9 МЛН
The Complex Napier Sabre 24 Cylinder Aero Engine Explained Simply
19:22
Is THIS Really The Future of Jet Engines?!
22:39
Mentour Now!
Рет қаралды 893 М.
Corsair and Hellcat Vs. Bf 109 and Fw 190
1:31:03
Greg's Airplanes and Automobiles
Рет қаралды 928 М.
TU-126 MOSS: The USSR's First AWACS Had A Shocking Problem
10:36
Not A Pound For Air To Ground
Рет қаралды 223 М.
Early Supermarine Aircraft | The Weird Ancestors Of The Spitfire
45:00
Britain's Most Mass-Produced Bomber | Vickers Wellington (Part 1)
53:05
Don’t Choose The Wrong Box 😱
00:41
Topper Guild
Рет қаралды 62 МЛН