F.A.Q Section Q: Do you take aircraft requests? A: I have a list of aircraft I plan to cover, but feel free to add to it with suggestions:) Q: Why do you use imperial measurements for some videos, and metric for others? A: I do this based on country of manufacture. Imperial measurements for Britain and the U.S, metric for the rest of the world, but I include text in my videos that convert it for both. Q: Will you include video footage in your videos, or just photos? A: Video footage is very expensive to licence, if I can find footage in the public domain I will try to use it, but a lot of it is hoarded by licencing studies (British Pathe, Periscope films etc). In the future I may be able to afford clips :) Q: Why do you sometimes feature images/screenshots from flight simulators? A: Sometimes there are not a lot of photos available for certain aircraft, so I substitute this with digital images that are as accurate as possible. Feel free to leave you questions below - I may not be able to answer all of them, but I will keep my eyes open :)
@aszneetish28012 жыл бұрын
I Don't know If you've covered it, but a video on the de Havilland tiger moth would be great
@akmzd69382 жыл бұрын
Speaking of requests and record-breaking, how about a video on the Macchi M.C.72 that, besides being the most beautiful plane ever made, still holds the speed record for piston-engined seaplanes that it set in 1934?
@squeaksquawk42552 жыл бұрын
Once again requesting the Heinkel He162
@tombarton44102 жыл бұрын
Could you cover the Handley Page H.p42/45?
@ME262MKI2 жыл бұрын
Wish you can cover the design and functioning of aircraft carburetors and fuel pumps, specially the ones designed for combat aircraft
@lakrids-pibe2 жыл бұрын
Fairly Long-Range Monoplane
@mastathrash56092 жыл бұрын
It is a pretty long boi, sleek though
@daveyoder92312 жыл бұрын
Boo. Hiss.
@allandavis82012 жыл бұрын
I sincerely hope that your comment was an attempt at humour. But in case it wasn’t, in the late 20s early 30s 5000+ miles was an extremely long way in addition to the first non-stop from the United Kingdom 🇬🇧 to India 🇮🇳 was a superb triumph and achievement. 😀👍🇬🇧🏴🇺🇦
@NICOLAI_VET2 жыл бұрын
BADUM-TSS🤣
@maximiliankoch25932 жыл бұрын
@@allandavis8201 thank you Allan
@MediumRareOpinions2 жыл бұрын
I want to express how much I enjoy this channels in depth coverage of the early period of aviation advancement, an era which I feel isn't given as much attention as it deserves.
@Emdee56322 жыл бұрын
There is always something clumsy or awkward about these interwar designs. They are starting to look like the airplanes of WW2 but at the same time many of them still look as if they are disguised WW1 designs. I guess in the future people will think the same about our present aircraft designs. Please keep making more of these videos, Rex's Hangar!
@papalegba67962 жыл бұрын
Aircraft design has barely changed for 30 years, since CAD was introduced, & will not change at all in future. It is at a technical limit.
@Sacto16542 жыл бұрын
It was only in the 1930's that the monocoque structural design--first developed before World War I--became commonplace in airplane design. The Douglas DC-1 to DC-3 of the 1930's were among the first widely used planes to take advantage of this.
@L0stEngineer2 жыл бұрын
Clumsy? Why sir, they had Moxy! Without carbon glass and turbines, these girls look like they had glad rags on and were out for a jaunt in the sky.
@L0stEngineer2 жыл бұрын
@@papalegba6796 those angry bees electric manned drones want to have a word with you.
@papalegba67962 жыл бұрын
Nope. Only the control systems have changed, aerodynamically there is no improvement possible, the same designs would have been made last century.
@steveneldred89282 жыл бұрын
Rex, I can't begin to express how much I appreciate what you are doing here. When I was a young kid here in Battle Creek Michigan, there were two aircraft setting idle outside a hangar for years; I kind of grew up looking at them. One was a B-25 Mitchell and the other a Beechcraft Model 18 (my favorite airplane ever). I don't know what became of the Beechcraft, but one summer day when I was in my mid 40's I saw the B-25 fly overhead. Someone in Detroit had bought it and flew it away. I've loved vintage aircraft most of my life and have always about knocked down the door to get outside when I hear a radial engine. Now, at 75, I'm thrilled to watch your videos. Your knowledge of the aircraft, the construct of your videos, and even your presentation are phenomenal. Thanks a million!
@charlestonianbuilder3442 жыл бұрын
I love the 20min videos as they are short enough to digest, and long enough to get alot of details too
@pencilpauli94422 жыл бұрын
If this was a "rough cut" I can't say I noticed. Thought it was 1st rate. Made me think that there could plenty of material in inter war record breaking aircraft to keep a KZbin channel going for a good while!
@jillatherton46602 жыл бұрын
Nicely proportioned with sweet lines, I wonder how a small rubber-band version might perform.
@stevendombrosky28422 жыл бұрын
I was actually thinking about building an R/C version myself. Very cool and great looking plane
@aerotube72912 жыл бұрын
Likely abandoned after a short distance due to declining power output🤣
@daszieher2 жыл бұрын
Build it! 😃
@lukeskywalket28942 жыл бұрын
If you could cover the F7F Tigercat, that'd be pretty cool cause it's an aircraft that really doesn't get talked about much, if at all
@davidmurphy81902 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@jeffbird29832 жыл бұрын
I really like learning about airplanes that I didn't know existed. This was another of you great videos. Thanks for making it.
@FandersonUfo2 жыл бұрын
more high quality content - ty RH
@kirkmooneyham2 жыл бұрын
That is the EXACT sort of aircraft that should not have been scrapped. One of a kind, it should have been warehoused for posterity. I understand the thought process on these things was different at the time, but still, sort of mildly tragic anyway.
@nickthompson96972 жыл бұрын
What a great way to start my day!
@SirWilliamKidney2 жыл бұрын
Congrats on the 100k subs! Also great video as always!
@Bearthedancingman2 жыл бұрын
I would enjoy a history overview of the "range wars". So many interesting aircraft.
@JosephArata2 жыл бұрын
Large aircraft, basically the size of a small WW2 bomber, massive monoplane wing with a fairly inefficient gasoline engine in most cases. Very weird time to be in aviation, for sure. Really efficient air frame designs for the amount of lift they could create based off their current knowledge. But the engines of that time period are just objectively garbage. We didn't really see any decent gasoline engines till the start/midpoint of WW2 when engineers had to start solving real problems.
@sydecarnutz9722 жыл бұрын
Very sad that this one wasn't preserved! Great presentation! Thank you.
@None-zc5vg2 жыл бұрын
They never even tried to save a single 'Halifax' bomber and the solitary post-war preserved British Hampden airframe was scrapped in time.
@papalegba67962 жыл бұрын
The Halifax was a hated deathtrap & deserved to be scrapped. The Hampden was much liked by pilots, but didn't carry enough bombs so was replaced by horrid 4 engine deathtraps. That pilots hated.
@k3D4rsi554maq2 жыл бұрын
Indeed!
@philpique31872 жыл бұрын
Rushed perhaps, but another wonderfully produced and narrated video on a fascinating aircraft which deserves note. Thank you so much for your efforts -well done!
@VictoryAviation2 жыл бұрын
Over the last few years, I've become obsessed with endurance flights. Just a few hours ago I gave an in person presentation about the longest endurance flight (with refueling) that still stands to this day, a mere 63 years later. Thank you so much for this fantastically researched and produced video. You've got another subscriber!
@davidvavra91132 жыл бұрын
Just starting the video, those initial specifications surprised me. A total weight of 16,000 pounds, gasoline weighs about 6 pounds per gallon and it was intended to carry a thousand gallons. So. 6,000 of the 16,000 in total weight as fuel is impressive.
@birlyballop47042 жыл бұрын
An Imperial gallon of gasoline weighs 7.2 lbs, so total fuel was about 7200 lbs, 3 Imp tons, approx 3000 kg.
@ngauruhoezodiac31432 жыл бұрын
It is an English airplane so it would use Imperial gallons (5,65 litre) instead of American gallons (3;78 litre) so 1000 gallons would weigh 3.2 tons.
@dantupper17842 жыл бұрын
Then add in the weight of all the in-wing tanks, lines, valving, fuselage tank, slipstream-driven backup pump- Over 40% of take-off weight. Wow.
@vumba13312 жыл бұрын
1 Imperial gallon is 4.545 litres.
@unclenogbad1509 Жыл бұрын
Great example of a plane that looks ready to do what it was designed for. Thanks for another good vid, cheers.
@Steve-GM0HUU2 жыл бұрын
Full load take off completed just 4 days before record attempt! They didn't mess about in those days. I was intrigued to know more about Flt Lt Major (e.g. how he came to be an experienced navigator). However, a quick search showed nothing.
@paulhaynes80452 жыл бұрын
I so wanted him to be promoted to Major! Almost Catch-22...
@Calligraphybooster2 жыл бұрын
@@paulhaynes8045 and very ‘Flying High’ (Airplane!)
@shoominati232 жыл бұрын
I guess that they must have lacked the materials to build a wing as thin and narrow as is on the U-2 Spyplane (as opposed to the once-passable Band) then they might have been capable of remaining aloft for many more hours with the great lift and fuel economy! I guess the lack of retracting undercarriage is because that would cut into fuel storage space (in the wing) , and probably more likely is that in those early days of Aviation, well managed paved runways were few and far between - with the Farmer's Field being the usual wilderness airfield (and you never knew how rutted and rocky that might be)
@daszieher2 жыл бұрын
Which is why they often found themselves stuck to a hillside. At least perceivably more often than nowadays.
@johnnoble012 жыл бұрын
I remember back in the 80's a bloke called Dave Chinnery designed one of these in the early days of electric model flight. Apparently it was a good performer no doubt due to the high aspect ratio wing and the fairly clean airframe.
@realityquotient76992 жыл бұрын
I'd never heard of this craft. What a beauty she is and a perfect subject for modelling!
@Ken-fw9dh2 жыл бұрын
I modeled it in 2003 as an electric powered free-flight and it was an outstanding flyer, with many great flights both stable and reliable until it came off the worst, flying itself into a brick wall.
@GSimpsonOAM2 жыл бұрын
@@Ken-fw9dh Re-enacting the Tunisian incident?
@Perktube12 жыл бұрын
Could be worth a Docudrama imo. Imagine the scene while in transit. One person flying, the other pouring over charts, or sleeping in the foldable bed. What did they eat, how was it packed, and did they have provision for tea? 😁
@SuperLancevancedance2 жыл бұрын
o7 nice video rex, as usual
@lakrids-pibe2 жыл бұрын
What kind of bathroom facilities would they have on those long range flights? A little bucket with a lid and sawdust? Would they open the door and squad down over the sideboard?
@mpetersen62 жыл бұрын
Bombs away! I read an account one time of an RAF crew man who took the opportunity to relieve himself over a target in Germany once the RAF started flying during the day late in the war. True? I have no idea.
@maryclarafjare2 жыл бұрын
This was fascinating, and the plane really was neat looking. Thanks for another great video!
@jonathan_605032 жыл бұрын
Very interesting. Now I'd love to see some overview videos of the various range/speed/altitude prize races during this era. What country and manufacturers were working on designs for each and whether they did succeed in taking the record. (And then obviously that demands follow-on, more in depth, videos on each design). Where there any that hit their design goals but yet didn't get to claim the record; because another better plane snagged it first?
@ivoryjohnson46622 жыл бұрын
Excellent commentary I look forward to each production
@ianbell56112 жыл бұрын
Thank you. Enjoyable and informative despite it being rushed. Cheers
@migueldelacruz47992 жыл бұрын
Body panels of a Ju-52, landing gears of Fi-156, stretched main wings from a Lockheed Vega, enlarged tail assembly of a D-VII, and the end product looks like a weird interwar Pc-6. I love it!
@tomt3732 жыл бұрын
Just how the hell do you compare this airplane's tail assembly with the comma-shaped rudder and the counter-balanced elevator tail controls of Fokker's D-VII as well as this airplane's body panels being ROUNDED unlike the straight/slab-sided Ju-52's??
@migueldelacruz47992 жыл бұрын
@@tomt373 I must have my ww1 Fokkers confused and the body panels I was talking about was not the shape but by the material it is made of. Heavily corrugated aluminum panels.
@alaingadbois22762 жыл бұрын
@@migueldelacruz4799 The Fairey had a fabric covered fuselage, not corrugated aluminium.
@guaporeturns94722 жыл бұрын
This thing is awesome. Thanks again for great content
@markpatterson49172 жыл бұрын
Nothing rough about this video at all. It was as ever slick and very interesting.
@167curly10 ай бұрын
Thank you for that very interesting talk.
@arno-luyendijk47982 жыл бұрын
Interesting. I have seen this aircraft for the first time in a Biggles comic book, where, of course, the prototype was flewn by Biggles, Algy and Ginger, and later stolen by BIggles big adversary Von Stalhein. The streamlining and relatively big shape in relation to 1 engine already struck me then, this is the first time I saw pictures of its variants and flights. Beautiful aircraft.
@jasonz77882 жыл бұрын
Great work Mr Rex thank you
@garylawson53812 жыл бұрын
Thanks for another great documentary video Rex's Hangar!
@karoltakisobie66382 жыл бұрын
Vickers Wellesley was used for records flight and not just one but few of them. Would love to hear that story.
@papalegba67962 жыл бұрын
Retractable undercarriage helped a lot, as did geodesic airframe.
@stevetournay61032 жыл бұрын
There's an Ed Nash video on the Wellesley...
@davidmurphy81902 жыл бұрын
This aircraft was used as the mythical plane used in the 1933 book “Lost Horizon”. Check it out.
@paulhaynes80452 жыл бұрын
Nice to see something a little different - very interesting.
@slartibartfast26492 жыл бұрын
A video on the Bristol Type 138 would go very nicely after this.
@SatumangoTheGreat2 жыл бұрын
The Bristol type 138! I had a model kit of that one, but I could not Google that plane because I had forgotten the name of the manufacturer and what it was called. Thank you!
@tonyraheja14 ай бұрын
Very interesting... Thanks
@nikiandre69982 жыл бұрын
Love airplanes, and love you vodeos. Different interesting models all the time! Exiting!
@cmdredstrakerofshado11592 жыл бұрын
😉your comment at 00:52 of reusing the photos Fairey Long Range Monoplane flash me back to my misspent youth watching Monty Python reruns on Saturday nights on PBS at 12:00 am, "Slide No.1 The Larch" 🤣🤣😉. This another Great video on a forgotten airplane I did not know about till today watch this video👍👍
@brentsummers73779 ай бұрын
An impressive looking aircraft. 57 hours to fly from England to South Africa compared to around 2 weeks by a passenger ship in those days.
@tomperkins56572 жыл бұрын
Excellent, as usual!
@MarkkuKoljonenwTinja2 жыл бұрын
Thanks! :)
@waywardscythe33582 жыл бұрын
CFIT. The weather could also have confused the pilots especially if they were in the clouds. This still happens frequently, unfortunately.
@radomircita94202 жыл бұрын
I would be very interested in video about Czechoslovak prewar fighter biplane Avia B-534 and possibly assesing its chances against German Luftwaffe in 1938
@Parocha2 жыл бұрын
I've always found that fighter to be quite beautiful... Almost looks sleek enough that a monoplane version would have been possible with little modification
@emjackson22892 жыл бұрын
And then they got to fly with the Luftwaffe . . . .
@terryboehler5752 Жыл бұрын
Good job
@douglasjohnson43822 жыл бұрын
Beautiful craft.
@wideyxyz22712 жыл бұрын
Excellent Rex.... A local company for local people (league of gentlemen reference) Based just up the road from me.
@fredeagle39122 жыл бұрын
Next, please do the Bristol high altitude record aeroplane. Good program, subscribed.
@BadByte2 жыл бұрын
Don’t worry about release days look at KZbinr Ahoy, quality trumps quantity ie. a quality video is worth waiting for
@freeman81282 жыл бұрын
Setting records was something of a diversion from the practical need for the Empire to establish a regular air postal service.
@drstevenrey Жыл бұрын
Are these just my wonky eyes or does this thing look quite good. I like the cockpit in the leading edge of the wing. Low, sleek and it does look fast (for the day).
@shoominati232 жыл бұрын
The looks like one of those Savoia Marchetti floatplanes for the Schneider Trophy. I believe there is one of the Catamaran type preserved in South America
@daszieher2 жыл бұрын
Good to see that you now have so many Wing Commander Tier Patrons that you can no longer read out their names. 😉
@kyle8572 жыл бұрын
Damn... Damn boy... Damn boy! Look at that wing.
@mochabear882 жыл бұрын
Nice video, will you share the results of this planes successor?
@Justwantahover Жыл бұрын
How big was the rubber band?
@flyeurodiesel2 жыл бұрын
dont forget ruth nichols. 83hrs in diesel powered stin son in 1931. engine was giberson radial.
@naughtiusmaximus8302 жыл бұрын
The plane that flew from Moscow to Vancouver is cool. It’s at the Pearson air museum in Vancouver.
@Allan_aka_RocKITEman2 жыл бұрын
@RexsHangar >>> Great video...👍
@reynaldoandannieangnged64342 жыл бұрын
Upon seeing the thumbnail, it reminded me of the antonov an-25. At least for the wings and slim fuselage
@cornevanrooyen4717 Жыл бұрын
Hi .would you consider selling the blueprints of the planes ?
@alexbaxter95122 жыл бұрын
What a pretty aircraft.
@Acidese2 жыл бұрын
You should do a video about the Aviotehas PN-3 "Isamaa Päästja"
@BunkerFox2 жыл бұрын
What a pretty plane
@ProjectFlashlight6122 жыл бұрын
See also the Me 261.
@duneydan79932 жыл бұрын
If one day you're passing by Belgium, you should come visite the Royal Military Museum in Brussels! It has one of the biggest aircraft collection in europe! The sad part is that it's an old museum with a lot of will to modernise but without enough funding. That means old buildings, a lot (a lot, a lot, maybe too much) of pieces but often with little information, a bit dusty... Damn, I actually managed to make me a bit sad writing this.
@stejer2112 жыл бұрын
I guess you should explain what the connection between Fairey and Belgium is, because most people won't know ;)
@RemusKingOfRome2 жыл бұрын
Ah! the Proto Fairy Battle .. to the joy of all luftwaffe fighter pilots :D
@trooperdgb97225 ай бұрын
Sure, other than the fixed landing gear, the cabin instead of canopy covered cockpit, high wing instead of Low wing... absolutely the same as a Battle. LOL
@MarcWeertsMusic2 жыл бұрын
Really enjoyed it, totally not a rough video. Have you looked at da vinci resolve as an alternative editor? Very powerful and there's even a free version that just lacks some of the high end fx.
@johnnunn86882 жыл бұрын
Very interesting,thank you. It would however have been nice to say which aircraft broke the records, while the Fairey was preparing to break the record, if that makes sense.
@forthwithtx58522 жыл бұрын
Nice lines, in my opinion.
@drstevenrey9 ай бұрын
The fin could be nicer than that, but it still looks good to me.
@DavidBrown-cp2vm2 жыл бұрын
Who needs fiction when real life & it's history is so much more interesting. Yet again, a great video expertly conjured from the mists of aviation antiquity. I think that rubber/plastic pants with strong elastic openings were not well developed then and that fact alone would have counted me out from flying a single engined aircraft to India non-stop. If one of the RAF crew was seen as "not quite right" he was probably better suited to the job than most of us !!
@spartan51572 жыл бұрын
What aircraft is at 0:45?
@Chuckles..2 жыл бұрын
Very cool looking plane, shame she was scrapped.
@pavelavietor12 жыл бұрын
hello i like it 👌 saludos
@RonJohn632 жыл бұрын
Back up early, back up often.
@K1W1fly2 жыл бұрын
A classic Art Deco aeroplane....
@uingaeoc39052 жыл бұрын
Now what about the Bristol Altitude record 138?
@donlawrence14282 жыл бұрын
man, those brits are insidiously persistent!
@fcv1_2 жыл бұрын
I wonder how most of record-setting planes have looked, if this plain(and modern)-looking design of fairey LR is unique while it's Italian competitor - bleriot-zepata isn't.
@puebespuebes85894 ай бұрын
What did pre war designer have with weird tail rudder
@HootOwl5132 жыл бұрын
I imagine Fl Lt Major's distress was from the fact that he wasn't promoted to Major.
@CaptainBanjo-fw4fq Жыл бұрын
Wow, for a 1920s design, this looks a lot like the fairey planes of WW2.
@JosephArata2 жыл бұрын
"Used 15 gallons of oil." Geezus, and I thought modern Gasoline engines were still inefficient junk compared to diesel engines, that's just downright terrible.
@throttleblipsntwistedgrips19927 ай бұрын
I used to own a 1980 Volare wagon with a slant 6 that had almost half a million miles on it, there was absolutely nothing left of the rings inside the engine and I used to joke with my friends that I got better MPGs out of my gas tank and than the oil pan😂
@jeremysolano3982 жыл бұрын
Fly LtJenkins upon assignment... : "My name is Leroy sir." Flt Lt Jenkins upon landing " LEEEEEEROY JENKINS!"
@TheLmiksche2 жыл бұрын
You talk Miles, yet the map was in KM, which one is it then? Thanks
@ronjon7942 Жыл бұрын
That's for our modern day benefit. England used Imperial, although it (and the US) defined a mile in units of 5280 English feet, carried through to this day. England officially metricated in 1965 although Imperial is in wide usage; often there's talk of reverting to Imperial. It gets tiring saying, and listening to, both metric and Imperial (and US customary units) in every video, and by now most should be able to do the conversion anyway.
@donjones47192 жыл бұрын
0:34 It looks like giant insects are carrying those planes.
@fogelmclovin68152 жыл бұрын
So it never delivered any post?
@Bernard-fo2qo8 ай бұрын
Looks like Lindberghs Spirit of St Louis but larger.
@G7VFY2 жыл бұрын
You could imagine a modern version with solar panels on the wings and two, alternate engines, one being electric.
@xdas112 жыл бұрын
It's always the awesome looking once that gets scrapped.....
@CaptainBanjo-fw4fq Жыл бұрын
5:38 He missed his opportunity to become a meme by joining the RAF instead of the Army or Marines 😢
@Rintaro882 жыл бұрын
posted 17 seconds ago, what luck!
@calvingreene902 жыл бұрын
You would have thought the RAF could have found a use for it ferrying parts and people around the UK home islands.