As Sen. Mitch McConnell, the longest-serving U.S. Senate party leader in history, announces he will step down from his leadership role at the end of this year, revisit FRONTLINE's 2023 examination of his lengthy career, his relationship with Trump, and how his shrewd choices reshaped the Supreme Court and U.S. politics. WATCH: kzbin.info/www/bejne/ramUaXZraruZirs
@michaelferreri12564 жыл бұрын
This “transparency project” is outstanding and I hope they keep going in this direction. This is more like a podcast and the trend gives more depth and detail than the customary ‘sound bites’ do.
@joebullwinkle50994 жыл бұрын
History shows that when legislative bodies become hyper political and winner take all forums, some form of authoritarianism is the end result. Could America become an authoritarian state in the not too far distant future?
@gregsimoes86454 жыл бұрын
I REALLY wish this kept going. I feel like Mr. Daschle was more cavalier with how things were handled re: Bork at the start, but after reflecting on what the Republicans did with Kavanaugh he seemed more chagrined. I really wish we could've heard more depth about that.
@danielgc19704 жыл бұрын
And this interview was longer than the ones with Collins and Graham. They missed questions that should have been asked such as his perspective on Cavanaugh's response to the aligations.
@chanceamania41473 жыл бұрын
The description is wrong, McConnell is from Kentucky, not Arizona
@billbruckner60015 жыл бұрын
Ginsburg will retire very close to the election. Too close to fill the vacancy. Ginsburg retirement in the eyes of the DNC will motivate all democrats and independents to vote. The problem for the DNC, Ginsburg does not retire in a vacuum. It will motivate the right as well. Still, Trump in a walk 2020
@elhombredeoro9554 жыл бұрын
She is not going to retire unless there is a Democratic President.
@billbruckner60014 жыл бұрын
You mean like she did under Obama. I think we both maybe wrong. She loves the law and the bench. We need to pry it from her loving dead hand. Like an NRA. member. I don't mean that with any animus. Just who she is. But the odds are against her until 2024.
@elhombredeoro9554 жыл бұрын
@@billbruckner6001 she was hoping to retire under the first lesbian President.
@JamesThomas-pj2lx4 жыл бұрын
@@elhombredeoro955 I'll take the rapists for $200 alex.
@elhombredeoro9554 жыл бұрын
@@JamesThomas-pj2lx honey I didn't get you and who is Alex?
@NunYa9535 жыл бұрын
Bork should've said something like, "if Ted Kennedy can serve in the Senate after killing a woman I can sure as hell serve on the Supreme Court as a racist". Wouldn't have gotten him nominated but would've been awesome television.
@brocklanders69695 жыл бұрын
@@samueltexeira2734 Lol. Bork wasn't a "racist ideologue" just because you disagreed with him. Kennedy killing May Jo was way beyond "negligence" as was the attempted cover-up -- far worse that anything Bork did. Garland was fitting payback.
@samueltexeira27345 жыл бұрын
Dirk Diggler no he was a racist because he was a racist. You literally just called implied that racism is okay bc of the Mary Jo Kopechne tragedy and now you’re walking it back
@thehomeplatespecial5975 жыл бұрын
@@brocklanders6969 what twisted logic you have.
@etiennescarbinski78904 жыл бұрын
@@samueltexeira2734like everything the shortsighted left does it comes back to benefit the right. The Federalist Society which is a permanent fixture in American society now was worth one Bork.
@markuhlman37674 жыл бұрын
@@samueltexeira2734 it is comparable. A murderer making laws and a racist interpreting amd enforcing laws...what's the diff?
@danielgc19704 жыл бұрын
So they ask him about his reaction to Dr. Ford's testimony but fail to ask for his perspective on the rebuttal. Why? Did they have certain preconditions for the interview? Once again demonstrating bias, probably behind the scenes.
@elamarjordan2 жыл бұрын
because they covered the fact that she was vetted and was found to be truthful. that simple.
@kevinwoolley7960 Жыл бұрын
@@elamarjordanno, there were no corroborating witnesses of any kind, her allegations may have been convincing but they are completely unproven.
@elamarjordan Жыл бұрын
@@kevinwoolley7960 sorry but... i was watching every second of the hearing in real time, and it was despicable. not only was dr. ford truthfully, her testimony brought several additional testimonies similar to this one. simply good journalism. bret, though, takes him with his toe.
@tr36244 жыл бұрын
McConnell (R-AZ)? Am I slow or did he recently move to Kentucky?
@DHTCF4 жыл бұрын
RBG wasn't the only overwhelming confirmation after Bork - Anthony Kennedy was confirmed to the seat for which Bork was nominated, without a single "no" vote, I believe. So it can't be said that Republican nominees were always getting a hard time.
@justinscott45034 жыл бұрын
Yet only Republican nominees face the mob petulant children
@DHTCF4 жыл бұрын
@@justinscott4503 that's whataboutery.
@justinscott45034 жыл бұрын
@@DHTCF no it’s not. Please provide me one SCOTUS nominee from a democratic president that had to endure what Bork, Thomas or Kavanaugh did.
@DHTCF4 жыл бұрын
@Robert Hunt me and my demmy pals? I'm not a demmy, I'm not even an American, just a lawyer who gives a damn about the integrity of legal systems. Kennedy was a squish? By that, I guess you mean, that his views evolved over time. Well, it would be a pretty dreadful confession of ignorance for someone to confess that their views now were exactly the same as 30 years ago, it would mean that person had wasted the last 30 years. Maybe you mean Kennedy was influenced by the arguments he heard, or by the views of his fellow jurists - heaven forbid that a judge might be open minded! Truth is, he was appointed by the same people who appointed Scalia, promoted Rehnquist to Chief Justice, and nominated Bork. But yeah, you're right and the Reagan team that looked for possible appointments was wrong ...🤦♂️
@DHTCF4 жыл бұрын
@Robert Hunt I'm aware of the appointment system for US federal judges, thanks. You don't whine and cry? I'm just contemplating the absence of whining in your comments. No doubt when President Elect Biden starts making appointments, you'll be urging GOP politicians and supporters to abstain from whining about them. Btw, gloating isn't a good look. Especially when discussing judges.
@robertpolityka84642 жыл бұрын
If there was any other Republican nominated by Reagan to the Supreme Court instead of Bork, would Ted Kennedy have been as aggressive in opposition? Was Kennedys opposition more on a personal or a professional basis? Kennedy and Richardson were political rivals and friends from the same state. (Richardson was a former Lieutenant Governor of Massachusetts. I'm thinking Richardson was part of the Rockefeller Republican wing of the GOP.) Cox was an old friend of the Kennedy family and served as Solicitor General. And, of course, Nixon and the Kennedys were "political adversaries".
@animeyahallo3887 Жыл бұрын
professional. ted kennedy voted for scalia which was nominated by reagan after bork
@Joesfosterdogs4 жыл бұрын
Sleepy Joe led the Thomas hearing...he will go down as a loser of three Presidential attempts and the sitting President, Obama does not support his VP...McConnell is the BEST political chess player ever making Bobby Fischer look like a kid at chess camp
@davidwilliams69664 жыл бұрын
How much will biden will Texas by?
@conorkennedy33042 жыл бұрын
I love this guy. Those glasses make me think he's willie fucking Wanka.
@MattyBeeProductions4 жыл бұрын
Mitch McConnell is from Kentucky, not Arizona
@conorkennedy33042 жыл бұрын
correct
@blue_diamond_gem5 жыл бұрын
Of course they blame the Republicans for “starting it”. GTFO 😂
@irgski5 жыл бұрын
God is the great equalizer.
@joncrockettable4 жыл бұрын
Little did we know the "McConnell Rule" was actually just the "McConnell Lie".
@johnjames54592 жыл бұрын
@Soham Bhatnagar Cry harder.
@Nomorehats4 жыл бұрын
Trump using a list of judges as proxy candidates is unethical
@johnjames54592 жыл бұрын
Shut up, loser.
@claudehall78894 жыл бұрын
Who reduced the threshold from 60 to 51 votes? That is a big point to gloss over
@emmajars584 жыл бұрын
Mitch McConnell I believe
@brandonnguyen39553 жыл бұрын
@@emmajars58 nope it was the Democrat Harry Reid; google Harry Reid Mitch McConnell roll call debate; it’s an epic debate on the senate floor where McConnell says he’ll regret it
@afminto3 жыл бұрын
@@brandonnguyen3955 Reid reduced the threshold from 60 to 51 for all nominations except the supreme Court, and McConnell reduced the threshold from 60 to 51 for supreme Court nominations.
@akp1672 жыл бұрын
@@afminto McConnell reduced the threshold from 60 to 51 for SCOTUS in response to Reid's stupidity. McConnell promised Reid he would regret his decision to reduce the threshold for appeals court judges and he was right. We have a 6-3 supermajority to make it clear.
@KobaAM2 жыл бұрын
@@akp167 uh, no. Mitch saying what someone’s going to regret it doesn’t make what he did okay. He’s a piece of shit who who didn’t live up to a precedent he manufactured.