Fuji GFX 100 II vs Hasselblad X2D

[@matthewbushey9455]

Great explainer vid . . . . having professionally used both systems extensively, and now owning one of them, I concur with almost everything you say as both positives and negatives - except for 2 things (with some personal perspective as a fellow professional fashion/beauty shooter): 1.) Fuji Color science: I can relate to you having issues getting the "look" you like out of the GFX 100 II; but what I rarely see discussed - which makes me think most users don't take the time do this - is setting up color profiles/presets in your native software of choice (PS, LR, C1). I use C1Pro, and when I first purchase a new camera body, I shoot test frames in my usual shooting conditions (outdoors/with and without sun/with strobes, studio natural light/with strobe/LED constants), then use those test frames to build very controlled color profiles as presets. It usually takes me 30-45mins per profile to nitpick over and fine-tune. I then use these presets upon import or when tethered, and this get's me 90% of the way to my "look." Prior to doing this, when I would just white balance off a color checker and make adjustments by eye, achieving my "look" in post would become really frustrating if the SOOC color wouldn't match my taste (which, for most any camera, rarely does). Taking the time to create profiled presets around my preferred color science saves a TON of time and headache, and keeps things consistent. Retouch and final color grade come easy after that, and keeps my "look" consistent as well. 2.) Hasselblad Color Science: I also agree, the SOOC DJI (yes, DJI - not Hassy) colors are really nice . . . but not perfect. They're way too magenta, with some cyan-green tint in the shadows, and these files take a fair amount of tweaking . . . especially for skintones in shadow. Again, spending the time to develop one's own color profiles/presets is a game changer (hate that term), or even a life-changer. In a nutshell, after shooting both systems across 5-6 shoots each, I chose the GFX 100 II: less expensive, better eye tracking, vertical grip for extended shooting/vertical comfort, solid lens lineup, weirdly faster tethered support, robust build on location. The DJI/Hassy is awesome, GAS is real (like you mention), and I doubted for a minute whether I made the right choice after sending the DJI/Hassy back . . . but in hindsight, and after many more shoots, I don't miss the overly expensive DJI/Hassy at all. Glad you found something you're finally comfortable with, and hope you take the time to make your own profiles and save yourself a ton of color science frustration in the future. ;-)

[@WILMORENO]

@matthewbushey9455 hey man thanks for not getting emotional at my choice. Lol ive had some wild comments. You know looking back at my pictures I now prefer the fuji for portraits. That 110 lens did more for me than the other portrait length X lenses. Also I really liked the colors from my 110. But the others were a non-starter. Thanks again for your very thoughtful and professional comment

[@WILMORENO]

@matthewbushey9455 also ive gotten the strongest opinions from people who haven't owned either, lol. Thanks again. I really appreciate this comment

[@matthewbushey9455]

@@WILMORENO Yeah, so many ppl ready to throw down over a camera choice! - and like you said, most haven't owned either LOL I also agree, that GF110MM is some sort of magic glass . . . easily also my favorite, too . . . .it joins the Pantheon of "incredible portrait glass that has secret sauce from another planet" (which, for me, also includes Nikon's first 85mm f/1.4 G, the Bronica 150mm F/4 Zenzanon-PG, and Fujinon 250mm f/6.3). I also found that, with the GF110mm, creating a color profile preset around this lens/GFX 100 II combo came quickly. I also second your hindsight revelation that the GFX might not be the best for landscapes; but that's really only if one has had a chance to use and compare both camera image files like you and I. I surely miss hiking with the X2D II, vs the GFX! hahaha Keep doing you man, your vids and relevant experience are great. Maybe it won't be another 5mos until the next one? ;-)

[@davidpalermo4695]

I was looking at Hasselblad and heard about how the colors are so nice SOOC but I chose the GFX100 II because for me it's a way better camera. I don't have problems with color at all in fact the colors are beautiful! The main reasons I chose the GFX system are: 1. I can put the GFX in BW mode meaning I can view on the EVF what the scene will look like in BW. I was surprised Hasselblad doesn't offer that. 2. Eye-tracking. Hasselblad has face tracking but not eye tracking and if any of you shoot portraits in low light or with a shallow DOF this is a huge plus. 3. Tilt-Adapter - if you know what it is and have used one you understand. 4. Film simulations. I didn't think I would like them - I only shoot RAW but I really do like them. It's like having different rolls of film in the camera. I have to admit I dislike the Sepia one though. ;( I use Broncolor strobes and they have "HS" which is different from "HSS" technology. With Broncolor's HS technology no power degradation happens unlike HSS. I think Elinchrom also has "HS" technology.

[@WILMORENO]

Thanks for your comment David. There's definitely a case to be made for the Fuji. That's interesting about Broncolor lights. Now I'm looking at those. Thanks a lot lol $$$

[@davetv8171]

The GF 250 and the prices are what kept me coming back to the gfx. But I guess it depends on what one shoots the most.

[@BrunoChalifour]

Ok, you have a good experience with your GFX100 (and obviously you need to justify your choice to yourself and the rest of the world ;o). I am sincerely glad it works for you... but it may not be enough to make a comparison (for this you need at least two protagonists/experiences). You are comparing your GFX to... nothing else you have used in the same way and declare the GFX a winner... amusing, to say the least.

[@wallisadair5002]

This was useful for me thanks

[@photographiezautrement]

@@davidpalermo4695 hs, even better than HSS is not comparable to synchro-x with central shutter (the first difference is that it needs special strobe heads)

[@VitVids]

I was choosing between GFX 100ii and X2D and picked X2D. Very happy about it, colors are insane. Design, UI, functionality are a great illustration of when less is more.

[@WILMORENO]

well said

[@DT-ym2jj]

Congrats on your channel. Authentic perspective that I connected with, excellent production values. I can tell that you took the time and put in the work to have a solid product from the beginning. Audio quality is excellent (many don’t get this right), logo is solid. Kudo’s. Looking forward to your future video’s.

[@WILMORENO]

thank you very much

[@walterwiniana]

I'm in for your channel bro. And I like this video especially your honest comparison on both cameras. I'm glad you chose the Hasselblad.

[@WILMORENO]

Thanks for watching and commenting

[@photographiezautrement]

Hello @WILMORENO Have you tried the XCD "V" range of lenses? (25, 38, 55 and 90). We are still progressing in rendering quality with these exceptional lenses

[@JuanRhodes]

I have the X2D. There's something special about HNCS. I know that the colors will be right without fuss. It's not a "perfect" camera, but I love it. I have trouble using my other cameras. I was on the fence for a bit as the GFX100II came out right after I bought the X2D, but I don't regret keeping the X2D in the end. It just feels great in hand. I'm amazed that a "crop" medium format camera is only slightly larger than my Lecia Q3, and with the XCD 55V mounted is actually smaller than my Leica SL2 with Summilux 50.

[@WILMORENO]

Absolutely. I had a Q2 around this time last year. Loved it so much but I also love taking portraits. Expensive changes were made. I heavily considered a SL2 before going MF. Thanks for your comment

[@Mike-qo8nm]

Almost at 1000 brother keep rocking. Great content!

[@WILMORENO]

thank you!

[@ChrisThe1]

I haven't tried the hasselblad, but on the fuji I struggled with the colors as well. As far as I can tell it's just practice in editing. After a few months i can get the fuji images to look stunning in no time. The raws are just very flat, in contrast and saturation - they need a lot of work.

[@WILMORENO]

Thanks for your comment and breaking down the crop vs MF vs LF in the comments. I was patiently waiting for someone to do that. I did get some stellar photos/colors from my fuji, no doubt about it. Maybe rent a HB, it's one of those things worth experiencing. Cheers

[@davidpalermo4695]

Bruno was that reply directed to me or someone else? I listed why I chose the GFX over the Hasselblad. I don’t need to use the Hasselblad in order to determine if it will work for my way of working. I think your comment was meant for someone else. 😊

[@petermendelson5839]

I went from the GFX system to the Hassy and never looked back, but there is one area where I am really tempted by the Fuji and that is tilt/shift lenses. The new 30mm and 110mm TS lenses look insane for landscape and architecture. You can adapt certain TS lenses to the Hassy system or try the HTS adapter but they are suboptimal solutions. Otherwise the X2D is my favorite camera of all time, and the new 90v lens is incredible.

[@WILMORENO]

It seems no one has regretted that move. I know at least one guy who regrets going from Hassy to GFX. I wanted to hold onto that 110f2 in hopes of adapting it to my X2D. It seems that's just not going to be an option. I gotta admit the X2D is also my favorite camera of all time. Close second was my Hasselblad 503cx. Maybe I'll get a Hasselblad tattoo

[@photographiezautrement]

Did you tried the Hasselblad H TS System ?

[@petermendelson5839]

@@photographiezautrement no, mainly because I didn’t want to invest in that system with a new lens and adapter, plus it’s quite large based on mathphotographer’s YT video on using it on the X system. But thanks for reminding me - I may take another look at it. I could also pick up a Canon TS-E and adapt it but previously I did that and wasn’t thrilled with the results on the 17 and 24mm.

[@photographiezautrement]

@@petermendelson5839 It is clear that between a Canon TS lens and a Hasselblad H lens, it is night and day! I never thought of adapting the TS system myself on an X2D, but as you were talking about it, I thought it would be good to point it out to you There may be an adaptation system on an MF camera (Linhoff technical camera for example). But there it is even more cumbersome I think. And at an astronomical price!

[@MirrorSlaps]

You can actually get a faster flash sync speed with the GFX! Although you have to use Fuji's H to GF adapter and either Hasselblad or Fujinon H mount lenses which allow you to use the leaf shutter. I think the latest HCD lenses with the orange square allow for 1/2000th flash synce speed with that adapter.

[@WILMORENO]

Good to know, those orange lenses cost a pretty penny too

[@photographiezautrement]

The "orange" H lenses only synchronize at 1/1000 with the mechanical shutter. 1/800 if mounted on the GF adapter. 1/2000 is done only with the electronic shutter

[@SjakBrak]

Thanks for the great comparison! For me, it was a very useful point of view. Question, have you been able to assess the new firmware of the X2D, especially for autofocus?

[@WILMORENO]

Thank you for your comment. Im currently using the 35-75 and have no real issues w.autofocus. The only bummer about the live view is that you can't use the self timer. So, no selfies unless you want to be holding your phone/ipad in the picture. I had trouble with the 80 1.9 af in the past. I need to get my hands on a portrait lens soon so I can have a solid stance. Thanks again!

[@dickytunes]

I’m so torn. I’ve got a GFX50s, so very much ready for an upgrade after 6 years. The blad is gorgeous and I love the colours but the GFX 100II on paper is far more capable and I already have the glass for it. I’ve got a loaner from Fuji next week and I expect it will seal the deal. If only Hasselblad offered the same service. At the end of the day. What a choice to have to make? Both are phenomenal.

[@WILMORENO]

Look at the time right now. If it's an even number (6:12 here), get the hasselblad. Odd number, you're getting a gfx100ii. Problem solved 🫡

[@dickytunes]

Not helpful! It was 0013 when I started to read your comment and 0014 when I finished. I'm screwed!@@WILMORENO

[@dickytunes]

Update. Fuji loaned me a GFX100 II. I hated it.

[@WILMORENO]

@@dickytunes ha, thx for the update --anything in particular? also, are you going to make the jump to an X2D? I'm liking mine more and more as the days go by

[@JonAdams-v8p]

Looking at a used Hassy great video bro keep it up!

[@malcolmmacgregor6222]

Completely agree about image quality of X2D vs GFX100. I have both cameras and the X2D is noticeably better. And, as you mention, no messing about with colour simulation. The X2D is a joy to use. Simple menu, gorgeous LCD screen. It is like using Large Format again. Thanks

[@WILMORENO]

Thanks for your comment. I tried really hard to like the fuji more. It simply falls short. The gfx is a great camera, but the X2D is even better

[@malcolmmacgregor6222]

No trouble - not often you see a comparison between the X2D and F+GFX 100@@WILMORENO

[@achdigitalphotography711]

Wil if you could post the raw files of the same scene taken with the two different cameras would be great. Thanks

[@WILMORENO]

At 08:18 that picture of the dock and then model is the same location. I dont have the gfx anymore 🤷

[@NorCal-yeti]

Loved your purchasing neurosis! I definitely agree with you on knowing is you like a lens after just a couple of pictures.

[@WILMORENO]

Ha thanks man, it's been a journey

[@jdpst20]

Have you used the Hasselblad XCD 135mm 2.8? I think it rivals if not surpassed the GF110. Also, having a 1.7TC it makes it a duel purpose lens. I’m glad I found this video.. I was considering selling my X2D AND R5C to get ONLY the GFX100ii. But I really don’t think I’d be happy. Yes it’s still 100mp but I just LOVE the images I get out of the Hasselblad. I BARELY do anything to them in Phocus 2 on my iPad. They are just THAT good. I’ve owned Fuji’s in the past and had to use specific capture one for Fuji and yes images were ok but a bit off. Yea I could sell both systems and get the GFX and probably pocket a few 1000$ but every time I shoot the X2D I forget about anything else.

[@achdigitalphotography711]

So I’m a GFX user for 5 years, I know the color thing going on and it affects me, but for the rest I’m quite happy with it. My question to you is what software are you using to process these two systems? I use camera raw, some people use Capture One which nails the color better than CR. But Hasselblad has Pocus which is great for colors but doesn’t work for anything else so you have to go through two different software to get things done.

[@WILMORENO]

I've been using light room classic for approx 10 years now. I just stick with that. Phocus isn't my favorite, I should probably spend more time using it. The FUJI portraits came out much nicer with the passport color checker sensor calibration. I went back and applied that color space and was pleasantly surprised. The landscapes were still consistently below standard. I feel like I need to go back to the grand canyon with the X2D and redo everything. I just got back from Maui this week, putting the video together now. The X2D is such a better camera for fine art photography. Still need to do some proper portrait tests. Just waiting on the weather to get nicer here. Thank you for watching and commenting.

[@yogi4fitness]

That's the thing about Hasselblads that even tho the process of taking pics is simpler the post is more complex. Also the newer XCD lenses are essentially full frame lenses adapted to MF sensor. Horrible vignetting that sacrifices corner dynamic range. GF glass is big and ugly but it's a league above the new XCD glass so when someone talks about better IQ from the Hasselblad I SMH. And then you ask them what is this X factor they talk about, they struggle to explain it. Talk about the Halo effect.

[@Mocha_122]

I've been considering between the gfx 100sii and the x2d. I haven't held tried the x2d yet but I just tried the gfx100sii in store and it didn't feel right.

[@WILMORENO]

Everyone that's held my x2d has commented on how nice it feels in the hand. I still dont miss my fuji at all

[@stevelink3]

Hello Will. Thank you for this EXCELLENT comparison of the X2D and the Fuji GFX 100 II. As a Nikon Z System landscape, product and macro photographer, I have been quite satisfied with the image sharpness and detail I obtain from the Nikon Z System (Z7, Z8 and several lenses). However, as I do on occasion produce very large prints *30"x40" and up), I've always had an interest in medium format. So, in your opinion, do you feel that the X2D with, say, the Hasselblad 120/3.5 XCD Macro lens would give me a very substantial improvement in image quality (particularly image sharpness and detail rendition) in the large prints, over either the Fuji or my Nikon Z System? (Also, as I don’t shoot video, that’s another reason the X2D appeals to me, as well as the NCS of the Hasselblad files, since I’m somewhat colorblind, and it sounds like color-correcting the Fuji files would be a nightmare for me in particular!) Thank you sir!

[@WILMORENO]

Thank you very much for commenting and subscribing. I had a d610 and 90mm macro lens a while back. Though I wouldn't call the jump substantial, it was noticeable. With large prints, you'll definitely benefit if the viewer wants to get close I had that 120 for a bit, likes to hunt but fanstastic production quality. If you're considering upgrading, the x2d would be a solid gamble. I think you'll be pleasantly surprised Also, b&h + adorama have excellent return policies :)

[@helloianzakharov]

I am thinking to get latest GFX with 45-100 (as you said boring lens). And I think you are probably right. But to get it and understand it I need to go through all the way and probably set myself to Hasselblad. Can you please tell did you try to play Fuji colors with Capture One or it was a Lightroom? I have heard many times Capture One brings Fuji colors to life. Thanks for video

[@WILMORENO]

Hey thanks for your question. I didnt use capture one. Ill say that after calibrating the sensor with the passport color checker. The calibrated sensor profile yielded much better results in LR. But my grand canyon stuff was still way below standards, even with the sensor calibration. Just got back from Hawaii with the x2d. Its insane how much better of a perfomer the x2d is when it comes to image quality. These images are my favorites after 30 years of photography. Working on that video now.

[@helloianzakharov]

@@WILMORENO thank you for reply. I set myself to GFX100II because of eye tracking. It works really fine. Not so good as R5 of cause, but decent. For landscapes I think I would go for Hasselblad too because of colors

[@jeffscott2246]

We need an update! Is the X2D still working out for you??

[@WILMORENO]

Hey! thanks for checking in. Absolutely, the camera is magic. Im about 90% done w.the new video. I need to figure out a more efficient way to make yt videos.

[@medeschurch]

6:50 well thats super subjective the film simulations are what bring to your jpeg some amazing film looks. its that simple if u want that nostalgic look u use those.

[@RyRch]

Great honest vibe on this video. 🫡

[@irenedp4947]

I’ve just seen some a hasselblad files but would prefer it any day to the Fuji. I sold a GFX 100 system about a year and a half ago just because of the color.

[@WILMORENO]

It's close, but also so far. Thank you for your comment :)

[@Mattrossphoto]

I actually like my fuj colors more than the hassleblad. I think it’s be cause capture one is awesome and Phocus is absolutely terrible. I also found I have no problem stopping down with strobes outside, and if want bokeh I’ll just get rid of the strobe and work natural light. Bokeh isn’t really worth the need for filters, overrated to me. If I want 250 I’ll just use my a7rv I always have on me. Think the hassy does look slightly better, might be the glass. My best friend has the x2d and the I have the 100s. We both have the 120 macros, I have the 80 and 35-70. He has the 55 hassy lens. We both shoot tethered and together a lot. Pretty damn close. Both make the a7rv look cheap, and I’d you want horrible color compare the Sony to either one of those. But having the fuj has helped me get the Sony colors closer to where I want. Not too much of a difference between the hassy and Fuji, and the focus of the hassy isn’t that bad with the touch compared to the eye focus on the 100s. Just seems to be a choice between if you want to pay a fortune for hassleblad glass or not . Sorry for the rant, been a big change the last few months 😂 I bought the ‘broke ibis’ 100s off eBay for $2200 and like I figured the ibis wasn’t broke the seller just was using adapted glass. Picked up the 120 macro for 1500, was literally brand new too. Like never used. So I’m keeping up with my friends x2d rig right off the bat for 3700 😂😂 I say screw hassy and the new Fuji and stick with the 100s 👍👍 And love these vids. Its tricky navigating the MF world not many of us

[@WILMORENO]

Maybe you guys could do a video together? Different lighting situations; same targets/settings/focal lengths. I'd love to see that. Someone not being paid but just reporting the results with no bias. I shoot these YT videos on a sony ZVE10. I took a few sample photos with it...Not a fan lol. I had the xcd 80 for a little while but it spent more time focus hunting than anything else. Maybe I got a bad copy. Sounds like you scored with that fuji, well done.

[@Mattrossphoto]

@@WILMORENO that’s actually a killer idea! We could get a nice comparison. And one thing is important is that it really took me about a month with the gfx before I learned how to use it confidently. Learning curve is a huge thing, Sonys are laughably easy so it strange having to learn a camera😂

[@BrunoChalifour]

"no problem stopping down with strobes outside"... "I'll just get rid of the strobes"... yes that is a way to solve problems, just throw them away ;o)

[@Mattrossphoto]

@@BrunoChalifour I wouldn’t call it a problem. I have the Sony rig and 3 ad1200s that have no problem doing hss. I’ll just take or leave bokeh it isn’t important to me, the model is

[@photographiezautrement]

Hi Matt, HSS is not comparable to the "X-sync + central shutter" solution. I have been using a Profoto Pro B2 generator, 1200 ws for 15 years and have taken thousands of outdoor shots. I can shoot for example at 1/800, f/5.6 and 1200 ws in Ibiza or Saint-Tropez, sun at its zenith in June. Totally impossible with HSS: there is no 1200 ws HSS generator, and with a 500 ws HSS flash for example, you will lose 1 EV each time you divide the exposure time by 2. Which brings the 500 ws to an equivalent of 125 usable ws. We are missing more than 3 EV of energy on the flash, or 8 times more energy. HSS is more of a gadget than a real professional tool. It's not for nothing that Hasselblad still makes central shutter lenses... Moreover, they are optically far superior to the Fuji GFX, especially the very latest XCD "V" range which are really impressive lenses, very close to the Hasselblad "H" I didn't understand the link between bokeh and central shutter.

[@ChrisBoultonPhotography]

It would be great to try the X2D especially with the firmware update but there is nowhere in the UK that will do a rental/trial ... £8k on spec is a gamble

[@WILMORENO]

With big risks come big rewards

[@WILMORENO]

man I just checked your ig. you do fantastic work. thats some seriously great art. cheers

[@ChrisBoultonPhotography]

Hey thanks fella, means a lot!🙏 Going to try and get my hands on the X2D!

[@Jazodog]

I wonder will you get a new Hasselblad 90mm? Heard it is great for portraits. Wonder how it is compared to Fuji portrait lens.

[@WILMORENO]

I'm not really itching for one. My 35-75mm is almost the same focal length. I do have my eye on that 135 2.8

[@drwatsonismine]

If you decide to sell the X2D I would be interested in it. Can’t find one used lately… Thanks for the video I really appreciate your channel and have been following for a while..

[@WILMORENO]

There's 2 available at the moment on fredmiranda.com - Also, keep an eye on b&h and adorama. Used ones pop up frequently, but they disappear just as fast. I'll put you first in line if I decide to move on. Thanks for the support 🙏

[@JohnMacLeanPhotography]

Just subbed. Best wishes with your new channel! Looking forward to seeing more X2D content. I owned new Blads back in the 90s, 501C kit (80mm C lens), 180mm CF lens, & 903SWC with a couple of viewfinders. I’m salivating for the X2D, but I would like new XCD V versions of the 21mm and 135mm. Cheers

[@WILMORENO]

Very nice. I had a 503cx for a while with the 80 and 120. Other than the X2D, that was my favorite camera. I feel like owning a Hasselblad is really treating yourself. FWIW I really like the xcd lenses. But, I'm hoping they make a fast telephoto lens soon. Thank you for the support

[@bobbykingma4109]

I own the X2D and I also own the XCD 35-75. There are not that many videos of the X2D and the XCD 35-75 together. Would be nice to see a video about this combination. I also bought the Profoto A10 and it creates new opportunities with the X2D. I used Sony for about 12 years and moved on to Hasselblad at the end of December 2023. I am in a test face, similar to what you are right now. It is a great camera to get used too.

[@WILMORENO]

I'm hoping that zoom is the only lens I'll need...wondering if they'll release a new one. Also, im pretty sure Hasselblad said the 35-75 is the best lens they ever made. Thanks for the subscription. I will definitely report my experience with this combo

[@bobbykingma4109]

@@WILMORENO , I also have no plans to buy more lenses. Maybe the 21mm. I will do some testing with the bracketing soon. I think it will create even better photos.

[@PeeGeeTips]

I have the 35-75 and the 21, both extremely sharp, I’ve never used better lenses, opted for an old Pentax 150-300 for the long range as there’s no native tele zooms, it’s incredibly light for its size and sharp, but a little crispy sharp than tack sharp of the X lenses, but it was 200€ from eBay and a no brainer purchase and produces beautiful images even with no vignetting . I’d love the 55v but would find it hard to justify when the 35-75 is so damn good, did pick up a Mamiya 80mm 1.9 which is like butter but tough to manually focus so shallow, that’s what you’d call a careful to use lens!

[@WILMORENO]

@PeeGeeTips ive got a soft spot for pentax. Kinda want to try some of those out on the X2d. Also that tt artisan 90mm 1.25 could be fun.

[@WILMORENO]

@PeeGeeTips just looked the pentax up, they got a brand new one on b&h right now $1700 off msrp...

[@silverclifflightshow]

I had the Fuji as well. I was lucky to send it back because it was still under the 30 day return policy. I sent it back because I couldn’t get any of the tilt shift lens until sometime in 2024. So I went with the X2D got all the lens I need even got a canon tilt shift to work with. Although I failed that Azle Blad has a long way to go the auto focus is terrible and low light condition. You think the focus is on because you get the green square, but when you review the file nothing is in focus. Also touchscreen does not work in the cold. Other than that love everything about the camera.

[@WILMORENO]

It's an easy camera to fall in love with.

[@wilsonsantos384]

Well I got already Both Tilt shifts, two months after released.

[@Jim-q2i]

Thank You! Hasselblad X2D is exactly what checks "all" my boxes. My 5D mark IV is good. No great at so much. But...

[@neildickie6278]

Well congrats on having the guts to make a clear statement on the comparative image quality of these two cameras. That is much appreciated, and in line with a favorite pro photographer of mine, Gavin Newcastle aka Fototripper.

[@WILMORENO]

Hah thanks, I still do not miss the Fuji one bit.

[@andyeighttre]

This dude deserves an army of subs! Great content!!

[@WILMORENO]

thank you very much

[@petrolabkilla]

Man, I was about to pull the trigger on the hasselblad…. And then I realized you can’t use capture one… WTF!! What do you use? This is killing my whole plan

[@WILMORENO]

@petrolabkilla I've been using Lightroom for the past 10 years. Stuck in my ways now. I've never even tried to capture one before. I know its been an issue for many. The fuji isnt bad. At least w.fuji you'll have generally better focus. Fwiw i still pick up my x2d just to hold it. Love this camera

[@SteveVest-k5k]

I agree with most of your comments. Did I miss it? Did you talk about the expense of the Hasselblad lenses?

[@WILMORENO]

Nah, I didn't go into that. They're def more affordable, especially used. I got my 32-64 for $900 and it was good as new. I personally believe the xcd are better optics. They also have leaf shutter so they're going to be pricey. Thanks for watching.

[@SteveVest-k5k]

I would think that they would be for the price. When I checked into the xcd and a lens, it would cost about 14K. @@WILMORENO

[@WILMORENO]

@@SteveVest-k5k well I've seen X2D's going for approx 6500 used. Also I got my 35-75 for $2850 instead of the msrp $5175 -- but if you like having new stuff, it's certainly expensive

[@BrunoChalifour]

​@@SteveVest-k5k What lens? Definitely not the 45 mm f 4! [used they are under $900]

[@johnpeterson7264]

I’m wondering if some of those off colors are coming from that Godox lighting ?

[@WILMORENO]

It may have contributed. I shot some portraits a coupled days ago with the x2d and that godox. I still prefer the hasselblad images

[@cr_phot0s]

Great review. I absolutely love the 110mm on my 50S II :)

[@WILMORENO]

Thanks for watching, they certainly hit a grand slam with that lens.

[@daltonljj]

Had the same issue in terms of colours. As a non professional trying to get the colours right is my worst skill as a photographer. Got the gfx 100s but sold it within the week. There is this slight yellowish green tint. And it get worst with some non native lens. Edit the colours was a headache for me given my editing skill level. That’s not to say it can’t be done as I’ve seen really good edits to correct the colours to look really life like. Later bought the X2D. SOOC the colours are perfect. Sadly with its then firmware it was not super usable given I have a super active toddler. Sold it and went back to Leica SL2. Colours were great but not to the level of hasselblad. Much more usable but leaving the medium format system left a void in me craving for that amazing detail you get when you look at the raw files. The moment the new FW was out I decided to return. This time it was so much usable. The only other thing I wish was that capture one would support hasselblad files but that’s likely never gonna happen so LR it is.

[@WILMORENO]

I'm glad others are seeing this too. I often got good colors in the Fuji, but kept running into instances where it failed, miserably. Unacceptable in that price range imo. And yeah that void for incredible IQ is haunting.

[@HelloStudio-x9c]

I feel the same way about Fuji gfx100II. Colors are terrible. Particularly over saturated reds and magentas in the skin tones. Even when I color correct for a neutral white balance the colors just look off. Not natural or rich. They feel thin and synthetic. Does anyone have a good capture one icc and film sim combo they like for color?

[@WILMORENO]

Thank you for commenting this. I've had so many people tell me there's nothing wrong with fuji colors. I definitely saw too much trouble to want to fix all the time.

[@HelloStudio-x9c]

Anyone else out there feel this way and has anyone found a solution they like? I feel like I process the Raffles in adobe raw. They tend to look a bit more natural, but I have to use Capture one for work.

[@loudandclearmedia]

Great video Will. As a fellow small channel creator, I get the struggle for the first 1000...it took me a while to hit. Having said that, you definitely have all the right stuff to fast-track yourself. Image looks great, sound on-point, edited in a way that doesn't waste time between relevant points, beautiful women...I think you'll make it, despite this subject being VERY esoteric..lol. But hey, that's why I'm here (looking to buy a medium format system this year), so who knows. Subscribed bud, peace! 🍻

[@WILMORENO]

Appreciate it, I guess this is a pretty niche topic. Thanks for your comment & subscribing

[@D.Trider]

390th subscriber! Keep Going!

[@WILMORENO]

thank you for subscribing

[@mcsey2k1]

Thanks for the video. It is hard to find an X2D and GFX 100 II comparison video from people who have used both for a while. Matt Granger (who I love) did one, but he didn't really give his preference and why. Me I was in the GFX 100 camp for many years, and the colors are nice, but when I got my hands on a used X2D Lightweight Portrait Kit from BH last summer, I never looked back. What did it for me was primarily the colors, the feel of the camera (quality), the simplicity of the menu system, and that gorgeous 3.6-inch screen. The GFX100xx has much better AF, but I primarily shoot static subjects. The only downside of the Hassy X system is the lens cost, but there is an argument to be made if they are worth it; in most cases, I'd say yes. My 4 favorite lenses are the 45P, 38V, 80 1.9, and the 35-75. I am not going to lie; I was itching to try the GX 100 II just out of curiosity, but when I looked at my old files from the GFX100S and my X2D, the X2D just looked a bit richer, which I was able to achieve with very little post. Seeing your quick summary for the GFX 100 II and why you sold it, I would have done the same and sourced another X2D, which is getting harder to find on the used market. They are both terrific cameras; you can't go wrong with either one. Overall, I think GFX100 II is the better camera, but for my style of shooting, the X2D with the 38V, 45P, and 80 1.9 is a hard combination to beat for static and not-so-fast-moving subjects. Your video confirmed my thoughts and saved me a lot of money. Great video, and I just became a subscriber!

[@WILMORENO]

Thanks for your comment and subscribing. If you could only have one lens on your x2d which would you choose? I really liked the new 38. I had the 80 1.9 a few months ago. I noticed some heavy chromatic aberrations and then the focusing seemed uncooperative in backlit situations. As a portrait shooter, It was still my favorite overall. When I saw the gfx100ii announcement, I just jumped right in. There was a 50/50 chance it would be the right move. Oh well lol $$$

[@mcsey2k1]

As of right now, my favorite lens is the 38v followed by the 35-75 lens. Yes, that lens is very heavy but the output I believe is unmatched by any other zoom. Ok know that is a very bold statement and not factual, because I have not tried all the zooms in the world😊😊

[@stevetqp9152]

Regarding the 35-75 Hassy zoom, has anyone done a test comparison of equivalent Hassy Primes , to see if it really does come very close in terms of image sharpness and detail rendition? Thanks!

[@WILMORENO]

@stevetqp9152 check out andrew goodcamera xcd lens guide here on youtube. From my research online and forums, everyone seems to say it outperforms some of the primes. Also, Hasselblad stated its the best lens theyve ever made.

[@stevelink3]

@@WILMORENO Thanks for the reply, Will! I shall check out Andrew's lens guide.

[@blazeboy777]

aaaan you should try V lenses. When I bought my h2d (ordered it), you trashed it and I got scared :) But I am glad that you are back as when I tested it, I felt in love with it. But I only use 38mm and 55mm and when I click 10.000 shots, I am buying 90v :) (I have to give some limits to my GAS) :P

[@WILMORENO]

in my other x2d video I used the 28, 38 and 55. I prefer the older xcd lenses. But the 38 was my favorite of the V's. It's certainly good to be back!

[@REMRODFILMS]

110 is the best lens created

[@WILMORENO]

That's fair

[@sols9449]

would be nice ion you could show us what you mean I'm saying the fuji 110 photos you showed were insane I'm a pro photographer and I know what looks good can you show us the Hassleblad portraits and skin tones to compare. I never shot with either of these. but I had raw files from the original hassleblad x1d and compared to the 50r and 100s I didn't like it. you have experience with both would love top see what you mean side to side.

[@WILMORENO]

Man I lost a small fortune changing systems. Maybe one day ill have another fuji in hand. But right now all my funds are going to hb accessories. That 110 lens really is nice, im learning I can just get the same compression by backing up and cropping in . Thank you for the compliment and for watching my video. Im going to hawaii tomorrow, will make an x2d update with the content I get there

[@gameshoes]

Hope your "new" X2D works out for you. If you ever have to get things serviced though, Hasselblad might drive you mad. I sent in my 35-75 about a week before your X2D video went up and... well, here we are 3 months later and all I have is: "We'll provide you with an update once we have a response (from their factor in Japan)". And not to mention that this is the second time I've sent in the lens and the first time took nine months without the issue being resolved. Hilariously enough I was able to self-diagnose the problem thanks to my X2D purchase. The lens was always doing a double exposure which would have been impossible to see on a steady workbench and too difficult to discern that particular cause with 50 megapickles. So, yeah, it's over there in Japan again and I'm still waiting... It's a system that puts out results, but I sure do hope that you have a long-term backup. As a hobbyist, I can sit for a while.

[@WILMORENO]

Hate to hear that. That's another common theme; Hasselblads sub-par customer service. They sent it back the first time and it was still defective? Could you do me a favor and give an update when you hear back from them? The 35-75 is my only lens so, that's not good news. Do you know how many clicks were on the shutter? I read somewhere they're rated to last 500,000 actuations. Hobbyist as well, no current backup...I'd probably just buy that 28, or the 45p if I needed to send my zoom off.

[@gameshoes]

@@WILMORENO I bought my 35-75 used so if yours is fine, you'll probably have no issue. I think I just had bad luck with my used purchase. I can't ding Hasselblad for that. But the amount of time it's taking is pretty poor. In the meantime, I ended up buying a 65mm to fill in the focal length gap.

[@gameshoes]

And I wouldn't necessarily call their customer service "poor" all the way through. At least their CSRs respond well. But the slowness of the service certainly does taint the experience.

[@WILMORENO]

@@gameshoes i loved the 65, oddly front heavy. Thanks for your comments btw

[@bobby350z]

Can you some of the bad colors from Fuji and the nice ones from the Hasselblad? A side by side if possible. Thanks. BTW - What software you use to process Hasselblad shots?

[@WILMORENO]

thank you for your comment sorry I don't plan on getting my hands on another gfx100ii anytime soon. There is that dock scene in the video though 08:14 you can also go to flickr and just look at galleries x2d and gfcx100ii, or any fuji MF camera. there's a noticeable difference in colors overall.

[@bobby350z]

@@WILMORENO - Well I own GFX now for 5+ yrs starting with GFX50s and now GFx100s. Maybe Hasselblad colors are a bit better but from what I know that only shows up when using Phocus, not Lr or C1.

[@WILMORENO]

I was using LR for my GFX and X2D. I saw a difference that led me back to X2D. Still got some of my best portraits ever on the GFX. Really going to miss that 110. Looking forward to giving my X2D a proper workout. Thanks for watching @@bobby350z

[@mahdimanesh4221]

I can relate! Just what I did was even more crazy: going to a Fuji APSC system 😅 I really miss the X2D and would say probably the zoom is a good start for getting (back) into the system. I had the 45p and the 80/1.9 - both very good too but I hoped to see the new lenses be available quicker. Enjoy your shoots! 😊

[@oliscurra]

I liked your last two videos man. Subscribed. Looking forward for more. You mentioned that when you went into the GFX system, you found your lenses pretty quickly which you liked. What are your lenses for the Hasselblad now that you're back?

[@WILMORENO]

Hey Oliver, thanks for your support. It's a little to early to say right now but I've been using the 35-75 only. It hasn't failed me in any department yet. It's a really, really nice lens. But I did like the 38 and 65 and 80 the best from my last run. I think the 128 would be nice, just not sure if I can justify the purchase at the moment. Thanks again

[@mikelyon5595]

Thanks for sharing your experience!

[@WILMORENO]

Thank you for watching

[@photographiezautrement]

These two cameras are not comparable. Hasselblad is much better for colors, the lenses are of much better quality to say the least, the lenses are all central shutter which allows flash sync up to 1/4000th for XCD lenses. The X2D allows to use Hasselblad H lenses with central shutter and flash sync up to 1/800th (which is their normal exposure time). The Fuji only shutters up to 1/125th and has a focal plane shutter, while the X2D (like other Hasselblad cameras) does not have an integrated shutter. Not to mention the very nice "tiltable" screen allowing the viewfinder at chest height and the integrated storage of 1 TB and the quality of the finish of the body and lenses, and the superb integrated software (which all camera manufacturers should take inspiration from). There is certainly a price difference but it is totally justified and we are not playing in the same league ;)

[@WILMORENO]

@photographiezautrement did you even watch this lol 😆 only like 3 lenses have the 4000 shutter but thanks for the comment.

[@photographiezautrement]

​@@WILMORENO Sorry, actually I wanted to reply to @davidpalermo4695

[@photographiezautrement]

@@WILMORENO Ho sorry, this message was initially for David @davidpalermo4695 Talking about the shutter speed synchro flash, I've been using Hasselblad H every day for years (H5D-60), and therefore flash sync at 1/800. At this point I would say that the 1/4000 vs 1/800th is "a detail". What I meant by talking about the flash is that the 1/125 in x-sync of the Fuji is so limited that it is almost unusable outdoor (as we saw in your video). Even with a sync limited "only" to 1/800th of a second, you can shoot in full summer sunlight and have 1200 ws usable (with for example a Profoto Pro b2, Pro b3 or Pro b4 generator). In Ibiza in June, 1200 Ws and the 1/800th -100 iso gives me an aperture of ƒ/4. Impossible to do without a central shutter. The problem with the ND filter is that it compensates for ambient light (that's ok) but also for flash light. It is therefore not comparable to a central shutter which does not affect the flash (a Profoto ProB2 delivers a flash of 1/12000th of a sec, much faster than the shutter). Another difference: the XD2 delivers files in 16-bit Native, which is not the case with the Fuji. All this to say that these two cameras are not comparable. Their only common point is that they are MF cameras with a small MF sensor.

[@WILMORENO]

@photographiezautrement ah that makes sense. I was like why are you telling me this haha. Thanks again man. Its a shame they discontinued the H series. Even bigger sensor is always attractive. But the x2d is way easier to carry around. Cheers! 🍻

[@photographiezautrement]

@@WILMORENO In fact, I was worried about the evolution of the Hasselblad range. I didn't know what to take in case my H5D broke down. Of course, the "small" CMOS sensor is not completely comparable to a 43x56 mm CCD like the Dalsa that equips my H5D, especially in terms of colors and rendering (especially for the rendering of the skin in beauty photos). The X2D is not quite at the same level yet. But with these new lenses and the update of the body I am now reassured, because I have a credible alternative to the H. I found Hasselblad as I knew it and that is obviously excellent news. And then I still have solutions: there is a second-hand market for H bodies and H lenses. The H was far too expensive for that to be viable. I'm not surprised they stopped it. As for lenses, the brand new XCDs that have just come out have finished reassuring me for the future. Here again, I find the "Hasselblad spirit" So I think I'll take an X2D with the 25 mm and the 38 mm for outdoors (fashion, street portraits, photographing Paris for fun), then my H lenses for the rest (80mm, 50mm, 120mm macro and 210 mm). For the studio (I mainly do cosmetic beauty and fashion) it will mainly be the H which is still "ahead" in pure quality. But the X2D is quite credible and will ensure the future in case of a problem with my H5D. And it will be better for my shoulders and my back! (the H5D-60 + 50 mm equivalent to 35 mm in 24x36 weighs 2.8 kg!)

[@NickDelDuca]

What software were you editing the Fuji files with?

[@WILMORENO]

@NickDelDuca lightroom only. Maybe if I used other programs the fuji would be okay. Hadselblad works perfect though so im still happy

[@NickDelDuca]

@@WILMORENO Oh yeah man that's 100% your problem, Adobe and Fuji have never played well together. Fuji partners with Capture One and all of the film sims are inside capture one as well as Capture One's Pro Standard profile that they manually create for each camera which IMO is some of the best color you can get out of any camera especially on the GFX files. Adobe is cheap and refuses to work with brands so they keep things proprietary. No one even the camera manufacturers know what happens under the hood of Adobe's raw processing. Adobe just guesses at their profiles which ends up being a complete mess. Not to mention Adobe's raw processing is extremely outdated. It would be too much work to overhaul it since it's integrated into so many things so they haven't fundamentally changed it for years. Unfortunately there's still some bad blood between Capture One and Hasselblad because Capture One used to be owned by Phase One which was one of Hasselblad's main competitors. That's okay with me though because Hasselblad is about done. DJI has driven them into the ground. It's not the same company it was before the acquisition. Most of the pros that were shooting with the H6 have left and their customer service and support is now horrible. I was always thinking my end game would be Hasselblad but DJI ruined that which is super sad. Fuji is a much better company that actually stands behind their products.

[@WILMORENO]

@@NickDelDuca damn that all makes sense. also fuji at least replied to my posts when I tagged them on ig lol. I'm pretty sure hasselblad hates me. But, I love this camera and hopefully it'll be supported for a very long time. I really don't want to change systems again

[@NickDelDuca]

@@WILMORENO Who knows, A lot of people speculate that DJI just bought Hasselblad for some of their lens patents they wanted to use for their inspire drones and don't really care about continuing making cameras. They really screwed over H6D-50C owners because they refuse to do a new run of the 50C backs and they have a high failure rate. So lots of photographers have expensive bricks now. I've also heard wild rumors that DJI is planning on using the Hasselblad brand to enter the full frame market and compete with Sony but with as much as they have been neglecting support of current products I don't see that being the case. Hopefully you don't have any issues with your X2D, I've heard repairs have a 6+ month turnaround and people get their cameras back still broken.

[@WILMORENO]

@NickDelDuca im not much into drones but i heard theyre getting heavily regulated. Like some areas law enforcement can override a persons drone signal. Im definitely not a fan of how all the new v lenses are still out of stock. But im pretty much set for now. Thanks for the information

[@GurmeetSingh-fr8uo]

Which has best AF?

[@WILMORENO]

GFX is the winner there, lol it's not even close. Hopefully HB keeps updating firmware.

[@GurmeetSingh-fr8uo]

@@WILMORENOdo you recommend x2d and 90mm v lens

[@WILMORENO]

@@GurmeetSingh-fr8uo man I've been wanting to try one. They're never in stock. I just got the 80mm again and I'll probably just keep this. 1.9 is too fun

[@nishantkanwar3038]

I am the 300th subscriber ❤️❤️❤️

[@WILMORENO]

nice, thanks for subscribing

[@petera1033]

hahaha very funny - the first video I watched of yours was the X2D exit ....long time fuji shooter with original GFX100 - I'm totally switched to X2D - FOR the COLOUR. atb Pete

[@WILMORENO]

We've seen the light ✨️

[@Fenn3k]

8:20 I was searching for this Dog, where is this Dog he‘s talking about. Watched it a couple of times until I realized… 😅 lol

[@WILMORENO]

Thanks for the multiple views. Sometimes I mumble, been trying to work on that

[@julioestebanperezescudero6246]

As far as I know Hasselblad is having a very slow and costly service. Firmware updates also suffer a slow release. While Fuji is a better option in all fields, except in flash synchro. But still you can buy a Hasselblad H lens and use the central shutter speed in those lenses via an adapter only losing autofocus in the process.

[@WILMORENO]

I think the old H lenses only sync to about 800 instead of 2000/4000 like newer ones. There are some "orange dot" h lenses with faster sync but they cost as much as the new lenses. The fuji is a fine camera, and continuous autofocus is so nice to have on a medium format camera. I just wanted to share my experience. Wasn't expecting 30k views that's for sure thanks for your comment

[@julioestebanperezescudero6246]

@ Yes normal H Hasselblad lenses go up to 1/800 sec. For me it is good enough compared with the 1/125 sec maximum native on the GFXII 100. Sorry I forgot to thanks you for a great review.

[@gozoomdaddy]

Keyword is film simulation... Think about let that sink in !!! :)

[@WILMORENO]

The only film simulation I'd want would be the almighty Kodachrome :)

[@BrunoChalifour]

"Film simulation"? Really? What for??? To replicate all the shortcomings of film, and there were many. I am sure I do not want to go back there (including Kodachrome blocked-out shadows). As for the Fuji "simulations", yes, they may be fun to use and they are just that, "simulations". Again, for what purpose except the fun of it... up to a point? I'd rather get colors as close as the one I saw and that triggered my wanting to photograph that scene/subject. We can always simulate anything from that, the opposite is very hard if not impossible to achieve (getting precise colors back from a "simulated" image). So for me, the choice is easy: no need for any simulation (except BW maybe).

[@porter6311]

Just a consideration for Hasselblad vs fuji. Hasselblad leaf shutters are second to none if you are dependent on making studio work with flashlights no doubt about that, But…. The quality and sharpness of there modern lenses are not better or worse than other brand lenses. And then the elephant in the room…. Non of the Hasselblad cameras or there lenses have an IP rating, meaning they are not water resistant, so good luck if you are a landscape photographer or take the camera out into damp or dusty areas. And Ok color science, it's a matter of opinion, but in my opinion you can make a fuji image look like cannon, Nikon or Hasselblad with a minimum of effort by building presets in your editing software, but by all means if Hasselblad colors are the only thing that works then choose hasselblad, but please remember that their lenses are about twice the price and the selection is very limited. Also the autofocus on Hasselblad is slow like he…. I loved Hasselblad in my film days but now 2024 they are ways behind and in my opinion color science is more a marketing gimmick than a real difference, color is more about feelings and opinion than an exact science.

[@WILMORENO]

Thanks for this educated take. I just moved on from the hasselblad system.. It's really nice but not so practical for my needs. I didnt even think about the weather sealing. Also theres almost no availability on new lenses. Still love the camera but had to move on!

[@WILMORENO]

Also I gotta disagree on the autofocus, it might not be ligbtnjng but its crazy accurate. I just moved to a zf with their fancy new af And my x2d was so much better for portraits. Along with much better ibis. Id just frame my model and let them move around. All my images had sharp eyes This nikon shows the focus box on their eye but a much lower hit rate

[@WILMORENO]

Oh also, i always shot strobes for like 11 years. With my x2d I probably used strobes 1% of the time. And now I miss the leaf shutter

[@porter6311]

Is not to be educational but more a reminder to os all, that as a creative photographer we should focus on the use case for the camera gear it’s after all a just a simple, but expensive, medium to express and capture our vision and intent in a picture, to make it appealing for our customers If your a pro, and if your an amateur then it’s to satisfy yourself. And no amount of sensor color magic, brand name or technology can make a bad vision, execution and composition look good. It’s the person behind the camera that create the picture not the 100 fps, the 102 Mpix or an autofocus that are optimized and have different settings for a train, animals and bikes etc.. It’s motivation, hard work and more work + experience that result in grate pictures and yes sometimes luck, So Fuji or Hasselblad or cannon Nikon or an IPhone it dose not matter. it’s the person and there knowledge + vision that will produce grate pictures not the brand / price / hype of gear in the closet or in the backpack that gives the result.

[@brocktonbensch1356]

Wouldn’t be surprised if you come back around to Fuji.

[@WILMORENO]

@brocktonbensch1356 ended up going to zf with sdapted m glass. Still prefer x2d over fuji, but I get why people like the gfx

[@Kliffot]

The Hassy colors are great for caucasian skin tones, the Fuji ones maybe better for Asian I think. That said you can render amazing glowing skintones when you know how to edit the Fuji raws.

[@WILMORENO]

Got some good portraits on the fuji for sure. Also spent a lot of extra time fiddling with color. Thanks for your comment

[@achdigitalphotography711]

Thank you for your reply Wil.

[@NetvoTV]

Hey man, my name is Johnny and I'm a freelance logo designer, would you be interested to have a logo redesign or other freelance work at the moment? I really need extra work right now because I really need to get a hard drive as soon as possible to back things up, I hope you can offer me some opportunities to help out!

[@WILMORENO]

I made this logo about 15 years ago in college. I own the copyright, put it on a ton of my equipment, and even had a watch made with it. Can't imagine changing it now. Thanks for the offer.

[@NetvoTV]

I see, that's really nice, but do you have any other needs right now because I will be really going to be benefited to have more works right now

[@robertowen-jones443]

Nice comparison. I’ve been using the GFX100 since its release five years ago. 32-64 is my walk around lens (even over the 45), and the 110 is an entire reason to shoot GFX. I wish there were GF adapters for the hassy

[@WILMORENO]

I'm still chasing that 110 high. Glad to hear we have similar thoughts. Thank you for watching and commenting!

[@_CharlieHarper]

... well, I think, that there are more differencies in between these two : 1/ COLORS ... Hasselblad dominates here. It saves you a lot of time afterwards. And time is money. 2/ STOPS ... you will immediately notice that when shooting from hand. With X2D you can shoot with 1 second s.s. and the shot will still be sharp like a razor. More light means better (sharper and more detailed) images. 3/ DETAILS ... GFX has less details per pixel, especially in the dark areas of the image, my own experience. The Fujifilm has faster focusing, it shoots video and generally is an industry standard. But for stills, the X2D is the No.1 choice without any doubt. What a grand shame they don't have 32-64 mm lens 😞

[@WILMORENO]

Agreed. Also for me shooting is the fun part, post processing is less exciting. Not a fan of adding steps in that department. You know, I wanted video on the x2d but I only took a few video clips on the my gfx during that whole time. I'm hoping my 35-75 will be satisfactory. 28mm equivalent on the wide end might do the trick. As a portrait guy; 75 > 64 :)

[@juanstevens873]

Hmm. I never totally understand when people complain about colors. That's because they never seem to test, in my eyes, correctly. They'll say I'm processing in Lightroom or Capture One. And I ask them if they know those programs are made by Fuji or Hassey. I tell them to compare using Phocus or Fuji X app to get the REAL colors. Especially if you're only shooting RAW. Shrugs. What do I know. In this video he didn't even say how he's processing the images. But it's how he sees it so.....

[@WILMORENO]

never say never :)

[@BrunoChalifour]

"They"? Who? The issue here is that for images straight out of the camera, JPG for JPG, without any interference in post-production (so the program does not matter much), the ones taken with the X2D look better than the ones taken with the Fuji, meaning closer to the real colors and without any slight yellowish/greenish cast. Nothing else is said or seen, whomever "they" can be ;o)

[@DreamReleases]

Oh, but the "program" or processor does indeed matter. LR has it's own color processing algorithm as does C1 and FOCUS @@BrunoChalifour

[@BrunoChalifour]

@@DreamReleases Yes but if you run both files (GFX100 and X2D) through them then you can still see the differences in the results.

[@trondhelgehie6771]

100% Agree!

[@wilsonsantos384]

I am Fuji all the way, in the end all the images are edited. If people think the color is better, go ahead and pay more. 😅

[@annenominous7220]

get the new Leica SLIII you will not miss the Hassy, all I can say.

[@WILMORENO]

I had a q2 and m11. Don't miss them at all. maybe the q2 sometimes. The sl gets a lot of love... If I went back to leica, it'd be an s3.

[@bernios3446]

It is honestly a bit silly how people are making absolut claims about Hasselblad being better. Fuji is sought after by many pros for their colors and the "malleability" of the 16bit files. Which proves.... well: Nothing. "Good color" is highly subjective and I say that after shooting in many different formats since more than 20y. Saying tha the Fuji cannot make good images is almost funny. I just downloaded a number of Raw samples from both cameras underneath a Matt Granger video on YT, there are differences, but once you dial down the magenta (for those who do not like it) in the Fuji files, skin tones are scaringly similar to the Hasselblad files. Surprise, it is the same sensor. I vastly prefer (I said "prefer") Fuji colors, and often find the Hasselblad files or too cool/ a too greenish pie/ too something else. Never as pleasing as Fuji's - Been a Fuji guy since my first Fuji DSLR in the early 2000s. I suggest you just go on enjoying your Hasselblads and get over the fact that color is a matter of preference. One thing that the X2D clearly has over the Fuji: it is a more beautiful camera. But you have to pay that quite a bit.

[@WILMORENO]

@bernios3446 Who said fuji can not make good images? Did you just make that up to win a statement against...yourself? I liked my gfx fine. I've been using many formats for over 30 years now. All brands. I also have a background running flexographic printing presses. In flexo, color output is measured by a spectrodensitometer. Color accuracy is paramount. It's the difference in getting paid or throwing away products. You could say im partial to a certain standard for color. Not everyone will choose your favorite camera brand. You need to accept that. "I suggest you get over the fact that color is a matter of preference" That sounds like advice for yourself... I'm not interested in anyone else's preferences. If im spending over $10,000 ill choose whichever I find better. This video wasn't sponsored. There's enough youtubers out there reading spec sheets and shilling. Im sharing my opinions for the people out there who want to hear them. Unless you've owned and shot both systems extensively, your opinion on the matter doesn't hold any water. Downloading someone elses files isn't the same as the research I put in. But thanks for the comment. It helps views I am glad you at least noticed the magenta issue. I'm currently having a lot of fun with the nikon zf and vintage glass. Nikons colors aren't as good as hasselblads imo. But I'm still enjoying the system a ton

[@bernios3446]

@@WILMORENO Actually I misheard twice the passage about sync speed followed by "it can make good images" - which I heard as "can't make good images" + the comments who about the presumably bad Fuji colors. Only after your comment I went back to that passage and now heard "can make". (I am not english native speaker). Fair enough. I also processed the same raw files (with the Magenta cast) in Capture One which converts the gfx files much nicer, quite clos to the Hasselblad files and without that cast.

[@WILMORENO]

@bernios3446 all good man. Much respect for the clarification here. Sorry if I came on a little strong. Yeah capture one seems to be the way to go with gfx. I always just use lightroom so that's where I want my camera to perform. Cheers

[@matthewtoothbrush]

One reason why pros don’t use this camera and likely never will is because Hasselblad won’t take their head out of their a$$ and open up the file system to capture one. Tethering them becomes a nightmare and phocus is terrible. Otherwise I’d buy the camera and I’m sure thousands of others would too

[@WILMORENO]

@matthewtoothbrush lol fair point. Ive heard a few people mention this

[@yogi4fitness]

Where did my comments go?

[@WILMORENO]

@@yogi4fitness what comments

[@Mortenthorpe-DK]

Hasselblad has fallen into the marketing hype ditch! They are super expensive, and super slow for most uses outside of controlled studio, and offer very very little to an already tiny audience - medium format is demanded (need to have), by about 1 percent of people who demand (not want) full frame over apsc… in medium format, the only, not negatable feature of the hasselblad, is the fact that they use leaf shutter instead of traditional shutter…

[@rencohatenboer9684]

Hasselblad lenses are manufactured by Fuji so I think it's not a coating problem for the colors, but the software. Landscape looks very realistic on my Fuji GFX 100 II, but skintones are better on the Hasselblad without tuning. Maybe they use the DJI technology. I heard from a lot of camerashops that there are a lot of problems with the Hasselblad camera's. It's not the real Hasselblad anymore. Also the service was not good. So I keep my old 501 CM and the Fuji 100II

[@WILMORENO]

I had 5 total x2d bodies, 2 were perfect. I think they've fixed a lot of issues now. I'd like to take some credit for the quality control, by calling out everything I didn't like. Also I think Hasselblad won't be sending me any units for review because I was a little too honest. RIP my wallet. It's kind of hard to tell right now, it seems hasselblad is listening and trying to fix issues. I just wish their lenses were in stock more often. It's like Rolex. you can buy your favorite model from a reseller, with a hefty markup. No thanks. I used lightroom for both m gfx and x2d. Way way happier with the x2d files. Fuji camera is fine but if you're a perfectionist like me, the x2d creates less headache. in my opinion. the 500 series cameras are great, I'm saving up for xcd lenses, otherwise i'd be shooting film too. thanks for your comment

[@DreamReleases]

Most likely you're using LR for processing the Fujifilm and you're using Hasselblad's very own post processing engine FOCUS for your Hassy. Of course you would see a difference. Hassy's very own native post processing software vs a third party app. It's not the camera's original jpeg files but the post processing default interpretation of those camera files. The camera manufacturer has no control over how LR or C1 is interpreting those jpeg files. RAW is simply a dump from the sensor, however the post processor will use the camera's WB setting if you have it set to do so. Since much of your work is landscape, you may be pleased with your results. Skin tones may be an entirely different issue.

[@WILMORENO]

I calibrated fujis sensor with two professional white balancing tools. Datacolor spyderchecker and calibrite passport colorchecker. I used lightroom for all raw conversions and then photoshop for fine detailing. In my experience, the fuji took more white balancing in post processing than any of my other cameras. Canon, nikon, leica & hasselblad.

[@julioestebanperezescudero6246]

Besides the color Hasselblad has, their lenses are to clinical and the out of focus areas in general are not great. Lens prices are of concern as well. Unless you absolutley need flash synchro at hight speeds in my opinion Fuji camera and lenses as the 55 f1.7 and the 110 f 2 are on another level, the photos are delicious!

[@WILMORENO]

Im looking at the old zeiss 110 f2 to fill that gap. Unfortunately, they go for about $3k. The 55 and 110 are both killer lenses. Looking forward to really testing out my 35-75. Hasselblad even states its their best lens. So that's comforting. Thanks for watching and commenting

[@julioestebanperezescudero6246]

In absolute terms maybe the Hasselblad glass could be sharper and contrasty, but in real life there more important things.

[@WILMORENO]

@@julioestebanperezescudero6246 but photography is my escape from real life!

[@julioestebanperezescudero6246]

@@WILMORENO I had the Hasselblad 110 f2 I was a nice lens but not great, the out of focus areas were much better with the 150 f2.8 and the image more rounded and organic. Finally I sold the 110 and kept the 150 . The Hasselblad 150 f2.8 has no central shutter, it is for the F camera series, also a much cheaper alternative.

[@moamaralsafadi4710]

Aber wo ist der Vergleich? Das ist ein Video für dein Gesicht!

[@WILMORENO]

@@moamaralsafadi4710 Es ist alles hier, in einfachem Englisch. Danke für den Ausblick

[@photoman5943]

show those Hawaii pics

[@WILMORENO]

Working on it now! I got some goood stuff, can't wait to share it.

[@Mortenthorpe-DK]

You think that the build quality of the GFX100S feels cheap??? LOL - you will never give any mirrorless a second glance then, because also having a gfx 100s- it’s extremely well built, compared to most any other camera- maybe a slight second to the gfx 50R

[@WILMORENO]

Google gfx 100s tripod mount failure. I didn't think my leica q or m11 was built poorly. You're 0-2 on this subject. Enjoy your fuji.

[@Mortenthorpe-DK]

@@WILMORENO just did google it, at your request- and if you call this proof… well…! It’s one review of the camera at the base issue you propose to prove that the entire camera is built poorly- ONE!!! All of the rest are not documented, or reference that one - and in any case - i always outfit any reasonably expensive camera with SmallRig L brackets … so there you are! It’s of course not ok if that one report of an issue turns out to be valid - but…ONE???

[@WILMORENO]

@Mortenthorpe-DK I got my first camera in 1992. Took film photography class in high school. Later, I sold cameras while in college. I've been handling them for a very long time... For what it's worth, I think the canon Rs are also poorly built. The new z9 feels nice. Also, I'm a competitive armwrestler with a 208 lb. grip strength on a hand dynamometer. It's really nice to grip onto my camera and not hear plastic creaking. Hasselblads are very rare in the wild. Have you held one before? Seems everyone who's handle both agree that the fuji isn't near the same quality.

[@Mortenthorpe-DK]

@@WILMORENO at the price of a hasselblad, also considering its limited niche use - autofocus speed and such, compared to a gfx… i would be disappointed if hasselblad did not deliver a bit more than fuji… would you say that this is fair? And yes, i have held that camera- it’s a nice build, but the pricing is outrageous

[@WILMORENO]

I mean the x2d is almost the same price as the 100ii @@Mortenthorpe-DK - you're probably better off with a regular ff mirrorless camera if performance is the concern. I gotta say the Hasselblad is more inspiring to have in my hand. That's worth a lot to me.

[@GKhanKutar]

You just said Fuji colours are not good enough compared to Hasselblad. The image quality is not good enough as Hassy? LOL . GFX100 II has better dynamic range compared to Hassy. Color are much more cinematic. If you don't know how to you use, do not put it on the camera!

[@WILMORENO]

Imagine not knowing that colors are different than dynamic range... You can pick whichever you like, most who have tried both agree with me. I'm willing to bet you haven't owned an x2d for a year to come to your...dynamic range = colors argument I know how to use both, clearly. Let's see your work. Either way thanks for the view

[@WILMORENO]

I think I mightve found you,. If you're istanbul you've got some nice pics. Doesn't change the fact that hasselblad gives better and more consistent colors. yeah you can fix stuff in post. some people prefer not to do the extra leg work and your last sentence makes no sense.

[@GKhanKutar]

@@WILMORENO i was born in Istanbul. Yes it is me. Thank you for your compliments. If you shoot fashion and landscape , you have to play with the colors for every mood. My last sentence addresses this. And you said image quality is not good as Hasselblad and I addressed to that. Fuji dynamic range is better. i know “a bit “ about cameras and photography:) Fujifilm colors are top. Film simulations gives you great starting point. They are very cinematic. Hasselblad is beautiful camera and good colors too but it is way far away from Fuji technology. I will like to buy one day if they make it faster and add joystick

[@WILMORENO]

@@GKhanKutar Haselblad need more lenses too. I agree fuji has more bells and whistles. I got much better photos, (for my taste) with the Hasselblad though. But this video has made me want to stop making more lol. I personally dislike film simulations, I never used any of them. We're clearly different tastes, and that's fine. You do take great photos. Honestly I don't find many photographers impressive but you do great work. Cheers. I was almost in istanbul this week.

[@GKhanKutar]

@@WILMORENO you need to do more videos. I love watching camera videos on KZbin! Don’t forget to eat havuc dilim baklava and kokorec if you go to Istanbul. Cheers!

[@davida5296]

its the SAME sensor.. any difference can be corrected if you shoot raw

[@WILMORENO]

You have no idea what you're talking about. Respectfully

[@davida5296]

@@WILMORENO ok buddy. It's the same Sony sensor on both. be well

[@WILMORENO]

@davida5296 you too buckeroo

[@davida5296]

@@WILMORENO if you want any more information, it's available on the web. It's the same sensor and the readout times are better on the Fuji. Now with the gfxs ii it's not even a close comparison with the x2d. The one thing the Hass does have over the Fuji system is the leaf lenses so conceivably, if you needed to synch and really high speeds, you could. I can point you to some good learning material if you need

[@WILMORENO]

@@davida5296 sounds like you should make you own video

[@sovu9399]

Technically it is not even close to Fuji, so, would i choose it just because it has a bit better colour science? nah. And i'm pretty sure, Fuji will fix those colours with the upcoming firmwares.

[@WILMORENO]

Thanks for your comment. Enjoy the Fuji!

[@sovu9399]

@@WILMORENO thank you for this comparison. I'm dreaming about Fuji so far)

[@DennisBater]

it is just you....

[@WILMORENO]

@@DennisBater the comments say otherwise 🤠

[@andregant9980]

Quick correction; these cameras are not medium format. It’s a cropped sensor the industry refers to this sensor size as large format. Big difference. As far as colors are concerned, that’s a toss up from shooter to shooter.

[@photophilsteingard8374]

The color science is amazing probably the best camera you can buy

[@davidpalermo4695]

That’s right. Color is subjective for sure. Cropped sensor, medium format, large format… I don’t care what people call it. It’s very high resolution native 4:3 aspect ratio! That’s what I care about.

[@ChrisThe1]

medium format is anything larger than 35mm film, which this is. While it's not equivalent to film medium format (120) it's still digital medium format, or medium format for short. Considering modern medium format digital cameras such as the ones in the video outperform 120 film in terms of image quality I don't see why one wouldn't simply call it that.

[@andregant9980]

@@ChrisThe1 Respectfully, that logic doesn't make sense. Based on your logic, APS-C is anything larger than micro-fourth thirds. That means 35mm, medium format, etc., are basically micro four-thirds... just larger. We know that's not the case. Based on the misnaming of the cropped medium format sensor size, we should call APS-C 35mm because "it's just a cropped version of 35mm" lol. Anyway... to avoid market confusion, the industry has established monikers for sensor sizes. Medium format is established based on its' size. Fuji initially branded the cropped medium format as "Large Format." It was all over their website landing pages for the GFX line of cameras. Then, they realized "Large Format" moniker was problematic. They didn't want to call it "cropped medium" because the word "cropped" detracts from the concept of having an advantage over 35mm. We all know it's clearly bigger even tho it's cropped. However, the point is that marketing teams are sensitive to word selection for obvious reasons, such as millions of dollars being at stake. Anyway, I'd love to start a campaign to ask the community to come up with a catchy name for the cropped medium format sensor size. How about "Super Medium, Format." LOL

[@davidpalermo4695]

@@ChrisThe1 I agree. With film is medium format 6x7? 6x9? 6x645, 6x6? I think people just like to say FujiFilm's medium format is "cropped" medium format just to get a reaction.