Full Building Design and Detailing using STAAD.Pro Connect Series and RCDC

[@anilkumarhm1175]

thank you so much brother no one is explained like this

[@shreesam9417]

You are great brother👍, I wasted money learning staad in Cadd centre, and not learnt as much, that I learnt from your single video. Thank you very much bro, keep growing, well wishes to you..💖

[@ervishalsaxena1332]

I am from mechanical background still watch this as it's really nice way of presentation 👌

[@rajeevvs3015]

Thank You so much for your effort

[@Worksmartnothard797]

Great 👍. Thank you so much brother!

[@vishwanathsingh9843]

you are doing great bro, and Thanks for this amazing info.

[@MainakChoudhury]

Thanks bro

[@m.tamilselvan147]

Very very thank you sir

[@krantikumar268]

Super Sir👌👌. One small Request sir, make a video on manual calculations of a building (G+1)??

[@Codown-j3d]

Thank you so much brother

[@MainakChoudhury]

Always welcome

[@BuildingDesign252]

Thanks bro

[@villadesigns2342]

Great

[@akshaythorat1788]

Sir thanks

[@MMSBUILDERS]

Translation repeat la mode la use LINK SPACE option click then u can apply ok use the method ...

[@MainakChoudhury]

Dissimilar Floors

[@mahendraaandkaanchanpatil1489]

This is idealistic to consider column centre at node beam flush positions master slave etc needs Tobe considered

[@MainakChoudhury]

While Going to perform design we don't know about the column size so its center is taken, later after design is completed we can overlap with the architectural plan and assign column locations properly by double checking

[@RKTechnophiles]

Sir, Kindly extend this video, for RCC slab design and detailing. It will be really helpful. Also please explain why you did not assign plate loading, mesh elements for slab

[@MainakChoudhury]

1. Design: kzbin.info/www/bejne/b6LHgqx3hM2sqLc 2. Detailing: kzbin.info/www/bejne/gnq9oYusjNONhJI

[@आदर्श-ठ3घ]

Hi! Great tutorial! I'd been watching this and have almost watched it completely by now. HOWEVER, I'VE A QUERY- CAN WE FIND THE MEMBERWISE BOQ FOR STEEL STRUCTURES AS WELL- using RCDC? If not RCDC then please suggest me any other software for finding the Memberwise BOQ of the steel structures. Thanks!

[@MainakChoudhury]

RCDC is for RCC only

[@amarsingh-cb9gn]

Sir What about slab reinforcement?

[@RahulPardeshi-zw2tw]

Sir plz upload simple g+2 project stadd+rcdc

[@MainakChoudhury]

Uploaded especially for you, except for the RCDC part.

[@abhaykumarsingh7129]

Instead of suffering to generate column through nodes We can use link option while doing translational repeat

[@MainakChoudhury]

It works differently for dissimilar floors, practically most buildings are dissimilar, so this way is preferred. I know you are telling this because in most tutorials they do this, we can easily do that when the floors are similar. But we have to dig deeper, have you seen any house having similar floors? The answer will be very few, so dissimilar floors means, dissimilar beam arrangements, hence this approach. Also do you expect to have columns at all intersections? There can be intersections due to beams also. In that case you cannot use linked steps. Hope I could clear your query.

[@kalpanabind1471]

U r right when i did link steps,it make column at every intersection

[@pydinaidu9966]

You are already selected min ne max dio of steel bars while in analysis and design part of stadd pro.then why you again choose the size of bars for beams, columns and footings in RCDC

[@MainakChoudhury]

In RCDC we do detailing separately, so we have to assign, basically only the frame analysis results are taken into RCDC, the Design done in Staad does not matter, you can choose to skip it, only perform the analysis part.

[@pydinaidu9966]

Bro I have been trying for installation of RCDC but it shows License does not found..can you help me to install RCDC

[@akshaythorat1788]

How to solve failed column and beam in design, or over stressed

[@MainakChoudhury]

You can do it in Staad by increasing the size, however for RCC design Staad doesn't select failed members automatically, you have to check the design report and compare, which is difficult for big structure, so RCDC is better for solving the failed members.

[@jorickslopez4679]

What version of staad is this

[@MainakChoudhury]

Staad Pro Connect Edition V22

[@saarojrawal3331]

Can we use x and y coordinate and z as elevation insted of 'y'. You have taken y as zero in plane .

[@MainakChoudhury]

That's the default settings in Staad, though you can change it

[@pydinaidu9966]

Does we get the BBS reports of all components in stadd pro

[@MainakChoudhury]

In RCDC, yes

[@fareedpathan6450]

when i import file from staad that is show a error "unable to read analysis data"

[@MainakChoudhury]

Sometimes error like this occurs, it can occur due to many reasons, eg: for beam ,if you are giving a level where there is no beam. My suggestion is to start from a small model with 4 columns, once you have some experience, you can attempt anything

[@shafeeqkhan5794]

I noticed in column design higher story have more reinforcement than lower story column why this is confusing plz explain if you have solution

[@MainakChoudhury]

It happens no worries about that, the structure is complex and many loads come combined through other members, so this can happen.

[@shafeeqkhan5794]

@@MainakChoudhury bhai kuch solution ho aap k pass to bata do

[@pydinaidu9966]

Where can we get RCDC software,i did not see RCDC in stadd pro Bentley v8 software

[@MainakChoudhury]

If you are using Staad connect edition, you should be able to use it.

[@amanborasi2183]

Make it in hindi, in english we alredy have so manny good forign tutorials

[@MainakChoudhury]

Thats true, but the language of the channel is English if I have more resources then I will make a new channel in Hindi. Also foreign tutorials are not focused on IS codes, so there is a need.

[@abdullahiahmedmohamed3925]

​@@MainakChoudhurywe actually need an English version sir thank you

[@aljanbarrato1615]

Good day, what is the problem if the rcdc is unable to read the data analysis? Thank you

[@MainakChoudhury]

There could be 2 scenerios 1. Staad file has some errors, check the analysis of the Staad file 2. Version difference between Staad and RCDC

[@anjanae7384]

after analysis you may have access from staad pro connect software.

[@mathabuilders2569]

Sir..Can we use staad select series and RCDC

[@MainakChoudhury]

Yes

[@rahulfaraiya874]

59:42 When i do the Beam Design it show beam is missing?

[@MainakChoudhury]

Select only one level, if you select multiple then it will show missing

[@rahulfaraiya874]

@@MainakChoudhury thanks,it is working

[@niteshkumar-kf6eo]

When i try to import staad file into tekla one notification popup it says "check that it is not a manufacturing model" What is the solution for this problem

[@MainakChoudhury]

Best solution is do not import, just make the model directly in Tekla structure. I know the advertising can be done in a presentable way, but in opinion there will always be some compatibility issues.

[@er.chetanlaxmanpatilcreati3923]

Sir give me downloading link of the software

[@MainakChoudhury]

It's not allowed in KZbin platform, you can search in get in to my pc website (no spaces),

[@mahendraaandkaanchanpatil1489]

Please using building option again 🙏

[@MainakChoudhury]

Didn't get your point, can you elaborate please

[@mahendraaandkaanchanpatil1489]

@@MainakChoudhury Sir there is building planner option to generate rcc buildings layouts of slabs and it automatically generates 3d model with precision column beam offsets Only problem is you need to apply seismic loads in staad before analyzing

[@MainakChoudhury]

@@mahendraaandkaanchanpatil1489 ok, got you you are talking about Staad building planner software. Till now I use Staad, RCDC and AutoCAD or Tekla+ AutoCAD to present those things in my final drawings. But since you suggested I will try using that too. Edit 1: I have tried using the building planner option but it doesn't work since I do not have autocad 2007

[@mdminhaj77]

seismic parameters not getting loaded :(

[@MainakChoudhury]

Which version are you using

[@pawzone4134]

randomly doing things without any explanation or detailed steps, he is just using the software it is no course disappointed

[@MainakChoudhury]

Sorry

[@niinuetey9878]

modelling in staad is not the best in the system at all. likewise its detailing where you cant have all the information for a beam at once. cantilever slab is also a problem

[@MainakChoudhury]

Every commercial software has its advantages and disadvantages, you have to pick the one which works best for you