Thank you for your attention today. You can find my “Complete Guide to Žižek” ebook here: www.patreon.com/julianphilosophy
@isaacgrant37844 ай бұрын
Your videos stand out from the rest.
@zoeasimaki69214 ай бұрын
💯💯💯💯
@whowereweagain2 ай бұрын
What u say at the end... This is why I like guattari's observation that all fantasies are group fantasies, also his machinic unconscious discovery, that is perfect for nooetic quantum woo woo theory, very prescient. In anti-oedipus they say that capitalism society couldn't handle even one living desire so instead of oedipedializing desire and forcing it to traverse the void of castration we should recognize that it produces the real and push it past the limit, or something I don't know, I dont care, to say anything too smart or even for grammar, thanks again this is really helping me out for understanding anti-oedipus and some mysterious secret stuff
@joseestrada3953 ай бұрын
Please continue to make content, this is very good quality material
@surelygettingthere2 ай бұрын
This probably gave me the new vocabulary to expand on my past attempts in explaining what it is exactly that is happening to me. Such luck to find this lecture. Thank you!
@satyasyasatyasya57464 ай бұрын
"Any mental analysis of the self without a material analysis of the world in which one lives, is nothing but solipsistic wankery"
@ir0n25414 ай бұрын
"Wankery"... i'm going try to use this word today at some point.
@satyasyasatyasya57464 ай бұрын
@@ir0n2541 haha you're welcome :D
@EMC2Scotia4 ай бұрын
Is this video in some ways saying this is impossible?
@havadatequila4 ай бұрын
True, but you can't do much about material conditions. Adaptation occurs in the individual.
@satyasyasatyasya57464 ай бұрын
@@havadatequila one cannot adapt to fire
@raw_dah4 ай бұрын
Your lectures are very very helpful. Words can not encapsulte my feelings gratefulness for your work. Thank you.
@scriptea4 ай бұрын
This is a fantastic series. Love the concept of subjective destitution. Recently wrote "There is a nonbeing of the I that thinks," which mirrors the "I think where I am not" statement of 21:22. Gonna use it as a lens to go through (again) Derrida's Margins of Philosophy.
@nightoftheworld4 ай бұрын
30:01 *Zizek’s materialism* “If we were to collectively reframe, as it were, our fantasmatic frame then reality itself would change. Hence, we are not the passive agents of a cruel reality and we have to flee into fantasy-it is that we are the active agents of fantasy and therein we can change reality.”
@TheBlapo4 ай бұрын
Thank you for this video and for your work. Greetings from Slovenia
@carlosdelclos4 ай бұрын
That was really good, man. Thanks!
@CaptainBaat4 ай бұрын
Amazing lecture, thank you for all of this
@kolmol90974 ай бұрын
Did psychoanalysis take Michel Foucault's criticisms seriously? Does psychoanalysis deny the influence of the environment, surroundings, and society? Is a person's personality affected by experiences after childhood? Such as adolescence and youth
@maryreilly51024 ай бұрын
When are you going to interview zizek Julian?? its due!!!
@nabeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaal4 ай бұрын
It’s like the Talmud interviewing the Torah. Simcha!
@maryreilly51024 ай бұрын
@@nabeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaal regular people interview him all the time in youtube!
@romerobjuancarlos4 ай бұрын
Cheers! Has there been a change in the way audio is recorded? It sounds so much better. I'd been struggling a little bit for like a month or so. Thank you so much for what you do, Julian! Big hug.
@DrSolimanMD4 ай бұрын
Good afternoon Jolian. Engaging as always. The Zizekian definition of the goal of psychoanalysis is intriguing as it combines theories across time. Per Freud's theories, the goal of psychoanalysis is to "bring unconscious material in mind into conscious awareness." I believe the attachment theories emerged later, around Lacan's time. I would love to know your perspective regarding connecting the being and becoming concepts to the perspective shared in this lecture? I can "small" a connection but I can't place my fingers on it if you know what I mean.
@Kingofcrocs14 ай бұрын
Attachment theories is partly what Lacan in some ways went against in his theories
@sina88833 ай бұрын
Sheesh- The mental acrobatics you have to go through to obtain a sense of inner peace in the modern world….🙄
@whowereweagain2 ай бұрын
I read deleuze and guattari and they tell me I should be proud not to understand the psychoanalysis they are talking about in antioedipus, but here I am so I know and I thank you for the content to help me see what they were responding to. should the point not be to produce a happy and joyous subject? This destitution stuff sounds bad.
@whowereweagain2 ай бұрын
(post)structuralists have a lot to say about simulation and stuff and I have experimented with that very intensely, so I definitely know what they are talking about, besides their nonsensical semiology.Idk I think the Peirceian takes on iconicity and symbols and anti-nominalism is probs better for understanding that. Like Frederick Sterjnfelt talks about in diagrammotology. also, I like a thousand plateaus, that's a good book.
@candycane1064 ай бұрын
👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾 I wonder what you’d say about the movie I Saw the TV Glow
@haopowei4 ай бұрын
Sorry , I just want to clarify. Are ultimate fantasy and fundamental fantasy the same thing?
@muditha-Asanga-Hewage4 ай бұрын
Why did you tell that ticklish subject is more important than sublime object of idealogy?
@TheWay-u1n4 ай бұрын
You want to place the fantasy of hope at the center of your frame.. Fishing.. fisherman gather in liminal spaces discussing the frames and baits
@TheWay-u1n4 ай бұрын
Children free of parental guidance escape the frame.. Lucifer unbound as the antichrist
@satyasyasatyasya57464 ай бұрын
i really hope you outgrow the edgelord stuff someday :)
@TheWay-u1n4 ай бұрын
@@satyasyasatyasya5746 I am what everyone else wants to be.. On point
@satyasyasatyasya57464 ай бұрын
@@TheWay-u1n oh its like a real life anime villain :P
@erdwaenor4 ай бұрын
*FAZEDORES DE BAÚS* Seguramente, não fez todas as Pérolas originais. Ainda assim, confeccionou um Baú para então as Amostrar. _Epistemic Gnomes_
@zatoichiMiyamoto4 ай бұрын
I thought about another movie, "Being John Malkovich"
@michaelyoon93554 ай бұрын
Achieve the ego ideal.
@tovialbores-falk30912 ай бұрын
What is the evidence for any of this?
@chrisrichardson89884 ай бұрын
All these Western jargony philosophies are watered down Buddhism.