Full Lecture: Why Hegel Matters

[@Andriak2]

Hegel cannot both like and dislike this video. He is simultaneously pleased and displeased by this.

[@taciprince7400]

Notes 6:08 vanishing mediator

[@taciprince7400]

18:10 indivisible remainder

[@stevespears-ss]

5:30 Start

[@mortenhenriklerpold8671]

Thanks. Hegel, Kojeve the night of Hegel, via Bataille, the impossible ex lacan, Thanks, love this.

[@otacon8225]

This makes me think of old Alan Watts. I remember him describing things as the way we understand their boundaries and so a thing without boundaries challenges the way we comprehend the universe.

[@JeronimusJack]

very compact, but i like that. it's makes more and more sense after a while/sleeping over it, my notes though are now all over the place xD i feel like in university again.

[@qanishque]

Love your channel❤❤

[@jackl4349]

I'd love a deeper dive with examples in these concepts.

[@gabrielnicolau4416]

Great Lecture, can you share the articles and books than you talk about in the video?

[@dimosthenistserikis5901]

Good thing I know a bit of German. I was inquiring about the difference between Schillers objective idealism and Kants classical binary between the neumenon and the phenomenon. Could you shed some light please. Thanks! Keep it up!

[@walterramirezt]

Love you guys!

[@jonasschanze5897]

Do a non-biased lecture on E.M. Cioran and efilism please!

[@keshavnandhan1234]

33:40 is nice

[@canreadandsee]

“Unendlich” captures the notion of unending and not the infinite

[@animefurry3508]

Calgary, Alberta, Canada! 🇨🇦

[@benjones1452]

Apologies, this is very difficult. I’ve listened to a good deal of your material and enjoyed in particular ‘the sublime object of ideology’ the meaning of the sublime, which is perhaps the starting point here, but honestly this lecture was opaque. I found it alienating, even uncanny. There is also the challenge, the location of the subtlety of meaning, the part that is obscured or lost on my journey to this lecture, it’s very itchy!

[@11kravitzn]

I kind of agree. It would be helpful to have some examples, otherwise it gets so abstract it's not easy to follow.

[@uncommonsensewithpastormar2913]

Continental philosophy consists of conceptual acrobatics that, hopefully, leads to deeper truths. I am of the mind, however, that these deeper truths can be approached using a simpler, more “common language” approach, but this is hard when the source material is so dense and inscrutable. In any case, you do a good job trying, Julian. By the way, there is one perplexing philosophical problem I wish you would address at some point. It is why intellectuals must endure an endless series of bad hair days.

[@antoineaboudaher1434]

From Lebanon

[@animefurry3508]

If Infinite is in Finite, then is there an Outfinite, and what is it?!

[@Cornasto]

yooo, where can i cop that tshirt from the thumbnail? i need it soo bad?

[@MB-rc8ie]

I like your lectures and I have listened to many of them. But I feel like this one is too convoluted. Not necesarly too difficult, but too convoluted. It would be great if you could listen to this video again yourself after some time and make a more structured version. For example you could make a lecture exmplaining how Platon, Kant, Fichte, Schelling and Hegel are different from each other (in terms of ontology/epistemology) and why they are considered important today. And why are the different concepts of infinity important. Maybe some more examples? Because now for me this seems like just word play. But I would like to understand more, because it seems interesting for some weird reason.

[@pmsaelzer]

Chile!

[@Liisa3139]

About the thumbnail of this lecture...Was Zizek at some point really that muscular and fit? Ps. I found hilarious mini skirts with Zizek prints.

[@AyushmanSaid]

From india❤

[@habibie]

Austria 🇦🇹

[@AlejandroJavierGuerraCarrillo]

México n.n

[@phyothiha6374]

🇲🇲 burma (Myanmar)

[@Vladimir-Struja]

unfinality

[@darkmatter4132]

man why doing this thing over and over again? why defining ambigious notions using more ambigious terms from other language like deutsch... that jsut make them more ambigious and not intelligible why the insistance on defining words that are confusing with even more confusing words? like the truse infinity and false infinity you mentioned 11:08