Fundamental Mereology | w/Dr. Ross Inman - PPP ep. 138

In this episode of the Parker's Pensées Podcast, I'm joined by Dr. Ross Inman to discuss his book Substance and the Fundamentality of the Familiar. We talk about what is must fundamental, metaphysically speaking. It's awesome!
Grab his book here to support the podcast: amzn.to/3v7EopN
If you like this podcast, then support it on Patreon for $1, $3, or $5 a month. Any amount helps, and for $5 you get a Parker's Pensées sticker and instant access to all the episode as I record them instead of waiting for their release date. Check it out here:
Patreon: / parkers_pensees
If you want to give a one-time gift, you can give at my Paypal:
paypal.me/Park...
Check out my merchandise at my Teespring store: teespring.com/...
Check out my blog posts: parkersettecas...
Check out my Parker's Pensées KZbin Channel:
/ @parkerspensees
Check out my other KZbin channel on my frogs and turtles: / parkersettecase
Check me out on Twitter: / trendsettercase
Instagram: / parkers_pensees

[@ParkersPensees]

Putting these episodes together takes a lot of research and a ton of time. If you enjoy my high effort philosophy and theology podcast episodes, consider supporting me on Patreon: www.patreon.com/parkers_pensees

[@claytonweaver2684]

Super interesting. The one and the many is the most interesting part of philosophy to me. It seems like you can't get any more fundamental than that.

[@esauponce9759]

I was just thinking about this! I’m gonna save it for later. 👌🏼

[@israeltrujillo-sba6747]

I discovered your channel recently 💯 great job man

[@ParkersPensees]

Awesome!! Thank you. Tell you friends!

[@bds8715]

amazing topic!! thank you!

[@robb7855]

I haven't watched it yet. But my answer to this question is person. Can't wait to watch and learn.

[@aisthpaoitht]

I think the answer lies in the being of self. Have you found any other material discussing this?

[@claytonweaver2684]

It would be sweet to hear arguments from someone who thinks that the one and many make a transcendental argument for the Trinity like Van Til did

[@daman7387]

4:55 He's asking him what he is *fundamentally* lol -- fitting

[@Beogradskiklub]

Bible of mereology

[@havenbastion]

Change itself, ie Aether, is the universal substrate of material reality and all physical processes can be understood in relation to it. There are three dimensions of change; space, time, and scale.

[@havenbastion]

"Expert in theology" is a contradiction in terms as theology is attempting to explain the impossible in terms of the improbable and can only be rigorous or meaningful in historical terms.

[@ParkersPensees]

Oh alright, thanks

[@martyfromnebraska1045]

Why are you all like this

[@havenbastion]

@@martyfromnebraska1045 Letting people believe nonsense is not doing them any favours, nor the people affected by their actions based on false beliefs.

[@martyfromnebraska1045]

@@havenbastion I agree, which is why I usually make arguments instead of smug assertions.

[@colenorville6676]

How do you back up your assertion that theology deals with impossibilities? I would think you have to have a grasp of universal truths to make such grandiose assertions, but I struggle to see how you could have universals without God