A designer's wet dream is an engineer's nightmare.
@seagull44323 жыл бұрын
ah yes plus the fact that the vehicle itself wouldnt work to start with
@chaomatic53283 жыл бұрын
so much moving parts
@edenassos3 жыл бұрын
@@seagull4432 Wouldn't work? I'm an engineer and I see nothing as to why it wouldn't work, at the size that's depicted in the video, it would have no issues. Stick to minecraft and let adults decide what will/won't work, little boy. It will work, but it being viable in real life as a product that a military would want is another question.
@protonnumber88673 жыл бұрын
@@edenassos Not sure about its ability to stand on its wheels/tracks, but everything else seems half viable. You'd probably end up with an anemic powerplant and constant reliability issues from the complex hydraulics though. There's also a bunch of weird features, like the dozer blade that looks too small to be useful.
@seagull44323 жыл бұрын
@@edenassos sorry mister engineer, but the list of reason why such a vehicle wouldnt be mass produced and wouldnt be viable is beyond your, and sorry, "engineering skills" it seems. thing is the more moving parts the more it is easy to have problems, a tank less well armored than a abram and 3 times the cost when it is less effective THEN A FUCKING ABRAM IN THE FIRST PLACE wouldnt be great in any way. and thats just the cost because this thing would probably be powered by electicity giving the fact that the size of the vehicle wouldnt allow for a proper gas engine of any kind with the a correct fuel amount, and thus i can only estimate the cost to be singnificantly higher than a abram which as been produced in mass since the 70's. i wont elaborateon all the other reasons why the vehicle wouldnt work but there ya go, the roots of things! please THINK like a engineer and not a random youtube commentator.
@julescousteau3 жыл бұрын
Too difficult, comlex and vulnerable. Have many "achilles heel"
@233lynx3 жыл бұрын
Well, considering it is not a product of design bureau, but some "academy of art", that is expectable
@davidh.69303 жыл бұрын
has several
@yu-chuantseng53943 жыл бұрын
Can be take down by a single 40mm HEAT grenade from a m203.
@ViceCoin5 ай бұрын
Cheaper more expendable than manned Abrams tanks.
@pedrokdc3 жыл бұрын
> Have a very autonomous and high tech tanquette > Add a feature to sneak around corners > Literally the only thing exposed around the corner is the driver. > GENIUS
@seagull44323 жыл бұрын
You have to sometimes make sacrifices...
@lord_scrubington3 жыл бұрын
@@seagull4432 for what? What does this vehicle do well?
@yesmybagel27513 жыл бұрын
This vehicle is stupid but i think its not for fighting other tanks.
@sheeplord49763 жыл бұрын
@@yesmybagel2751 The track design leads to horrid ground pressure, they little trolley wheels are useless, the pilot’s seat is atrocious, it carries anti-tank missile, and is just the stupidest bloody thing I have seen in a long time. It is useless for anything than a cardboard mock-up to show off at a cosplay convention.
@yesmybagel27513 жыл бұрын
@@sheeplord4976 i guess its only used to fight the trash compactor
@jesokingcryst3 жыл бұрын
This looks really fun, but also needlessly complex. Something straight out of sci-fi computer game or a movie. It's very original.
@infinity52883 жыл бұрын
But very vulnerable and probably not gonna be used, its most vulnerable parts is the tracks, kill the tracks and you stop the vehichle.
@kartofun76723 жыл бұрын
@@infinity5288 or actually the track bearings
@Catboi90003 жыл бұрын
Skynet moment
@gopnikmcblyat31083 жыл бұрын
No sh*t he even used a marine from Halo, the Game with a nearly invincible super soldier that can literally take on an army and win
@taucalm8 ай бұрын
@@infinity5288 were vulnerably when alone, but as a support or people controlling device very usable I think.
@ikanberapi21893 жыл бұрын
Anti Vehicle Rockets be like: "ah another food"
@myearshurtnoone13673 жыл бұрын
unless vehicle has an active protection system on it
@edenassos3 жыл бұрын
Ever heard of Trophy APS?
@myearshurtnoone13673 жыл бұрын
@@edenassos lol we are talking about the same thing
@edenassos3 жыл бұрын
@@myearshurtnoone1367 Yessss, great minds think alike.
@HawksOfHazard3 жыл бұрын
while the model itself is pretty well done, the actual usability of this design is abysmal, theres no reason to cover the missiles like that, missiles arent covered on several platforms, and here all it does is limit the human operators visibility, getting in and out looks like a massive pain in the ass. the wheels are way too small for any meaningful usability, and multi-tracked designs look cool, but are generally inferior to full tracked designs. While I will admit I have also made some "ultimate ground vehicles" they practically dont make sense. Feels more like how many guns we can stick on this thing, rather than is it worth it. Again though, as a model, very nicely done
@ankitminz58723 жыл бұрын
Don't know how it would perform or even come to existence in real world but its awesome for any game.
@Инженерс3 жыл бұрын
Танкетка. Забытое старое. Проходили уже. Очень эффектно! Но неэффективно! Главное: 1.Нет брони. Совсем нет. 12,7 будет пробивать. 2.Запас хода? Под вопросом. 3.Верхние пулеметы как перезаряжать? Малый БК. 4.Городской бой? Слишком крупногабаритный, и хлопотно. Проще беспилотников - роботов. Без личного состава! 5.Один боец это мало! Один механ, другой стрелок должен быть. 6.Обзор вопрос? Можно куча электроники и камеры во все стороны. Но тогда нужен постоянный боевой режим. 7.Конструктивно, слишком много механики, куча траков, Катков. Избыточно. Наличие гидравлики это не есть достоинство. При поломке 1 боец будет ремонтом заниматься? См. пункт выше 5. 8.Высокий центр тяжести. Может опрокинутся. ДА, может встать. Верю. А зачем допускать эту возможность , а потом преодолевать ее? 9. Достоинство - классный музон! 10.Пацаны, тыкните +, пусть буржуи думают что тут чет крутое написано!
@chee.rah.monurB3 жыл бұрын
Everyone gangsta till the tank start playing peekaboo.
@riku37163 жыл бұрын
Including space for a pilot despite remote control etc. increases flexibility and helps if there is lot of jamming etc. but also takes away major advantage of unmanned vehicles in not needing space for a human. Without it the robot could be lower/smaller or just carry more fuel/batteries/ammo on the middle, maybe extra sensors where the pilot's head is.
@tashdelevchaff5923 жыл бұрын
Its a nightmare if u must stay in that thing , trust me...
@infinity52883 жыл бұрын
especially if you're claustrophobic
@DarlingbroughSciFiBuilds9 ай бұрын
I'm looking at it from a design point of view, and I love it!
@Cormano9803 жыл бұрын
RPG god Jamsheed would have a field day with this
@justkeenan7992 жыл бұрын
The way it looks around the corner is frightening. I like it
@jackwincent93643 жыл бұрын
very good. I also agree with this in order to protect the tanks
@industrialdesign29693 жыл бұрын
Bravo!
@EmbeddedWithin3 жыл бұрын
@@industrialdesign2969 Very vulnerable, very claustrophobic, you didn’t think where to put all the ammo, autoloading systems, and etc. I think that this can be something like deployed by tanks for self defense, due to its small size.
@channelunknown6953 жыл бұрын
military: this will go great with everything
@infinity52883 жыл бұрын
This will not go great, it defies the laws of physics!
@электро-лис3 жыл бұрын
И как ему одному отвечать за столько функций? Он будет перегружен, боевая эффективность почти 0. Да и ходовая часть вызавает вопросы. Зачем было делать 3 гусеницы на борт? Да еще и оставлять промежуток, в котором аппарат может сесть на днище? Дорого и неэффективно. Про бронированме даже спрашивать не буду, там много брони не влезет. Хотя огромный лобовой триплекс станет прекрасной мишенью для ослепления боевой единицы.
@электро-лис3 жыл бұрын
И как ему одному отвечать за столько функций? Он будет перегружен, боевая эффективность почти 0. Да и ходовая часть вызавает вопросы. Зачем было делать 3 гусеницы на борт? Да еще и оставлять промежуток, в котором аппарат может сесть на днище? Дорого и неэффективно. Про бронированме даже спрашивать не буду, там много брони не влезет. Хотя огромный лобовой триплекс станет прекрасной мишенью для ослепления боевой единицы.
@HawksOfHazard3 жыл бұрын
@@infinity5288 and logistics!
@stephenpilarca91633 жыл бұрын
this is great if lego built this bad boi tank
@Baton18043 жыл бұрын
There is no need for windows in this concept, the windows only weaken the structure. We need cameras in all directions and a VR glasses for the driver.
@VarenvelDarakus3 жыл бұрын
key components exposed , tall(easier to hit) most likely loud as hell and impractical
@Coecoo3 жыл бұрын
A good half of all the features are impossible to realistically: A) Have the internal machinery for. and B) Have enough engines & hydraulic pumps to operate all the moving parts within the allocated space.
@itabiritomg3 жыл бұрын
Cool looking but as fragile as a crystal cup. It would be a great remote control toy if made on 1/50 scale
@i_am_jarvistm72203 жыл бұрын
This strikes me as a very underrated design. It's vulnerable, yes, but given the fact that it's roughly the volume of, say, a pickup truck (albeit much heavier than one, hypothetically), I would actually expect as much. Setting aside the vulnerability, however, what I see here is a VERY versatile craft that you could deploy practically ANYWHERE. It's practically the foot soldier of war-based vehicles, which would be perfect for urban warfare, guerilla warfare, STEALTH warfare, maybe not ideal for open fields or anything of that nature though... The limited anti-vehicular capabilities are a bit on the underwhelming side, plus a few hypotheticals in the design seem to blatantly ignore the concept of vehicular mass, but other than that, it's actually brilliant...
@callumpatterson34303 жыл бұрын
yes perfect just what needs a nerf gun attached to it and kids can play for hours on end
@daiviswiliam16873 жыл бұрын
RTX-65 GUNTANK EARLY TYPE "現実版ガンタンク"だ! 2:33, hello there "はい、ひょっこりはん"
@IronladGamerOfficial3 жыл бұрын
3:58 ah yes, nothing like strolling around in a building with a golf cart sized tank
@CharlesHuse3 жыл бұрын
When the Russians watch the Tank Police anime.... But, in all actuality, instead of the fixed package consisting of all the weapons shown, The individual weapons need to be completely removable to provide a mission specific alteration. Want patrol duty, then drop the 40mm and 50cal/12.5mm and the rocket launchers and add a 2nd 7.62mm MG. Want light anti-vehicle mission, go against light mechanized infantry. Ditch the 7.62 MG and go with the 50cal and 40mm. Anti-armor? Plug in the light MG and add more rocket launchers. Civilian missions are also possible with this. Ditch the weaponry and add flame suppression for search and rescue of buildings or downed aircraft. The weapons mounts could be fitted with connections to accept gurneys and pods to transport injured persons to safety and medical assistance. It would be tremendously useful in fighting forest and wild fires over rough terrain. There are many possibilities for equipment such as this, and not all applications would be of a military nature. I say continue to study and develop the concept.
@industrialdesign29693 жыл бұрын
Thank You very much!
@troykipping19613 жыл бұрын
This looks to me just to be an early Halo (the video game) armor, just more complex and less human. If you are going for small anime mec this is a good start but there is too little on the thing. What this "Sokhumi" carries could be carried by under a conservative estimate 4/5 people and more liberally 7/8 people; a relatively small squad which ever estimate you chose. The "Sokhumi" has [in order] an AT missile, which can be carried by one man and can have more ammo than the presumably two shots shown (carried by the squad) and can (depending on the weapon system) be more adaptive/carry more than the loaded ammo types and have other firing modes. Smoke grenades can be carried by unit member and fired from a rifle mounted launcher or from a designated grenade launching small arms system. What ever interested governments would rather just pay the funeral expenses of a few dead service members then pay the day to day cost of one of these units; the only real advantage "Sokhumi" units have over a small similarly equipped squad is the (when manned) risk of only one service member being a risk as opposed to a squad.
@NHC6853 жыл бұрын
Amazing I'm so amaze from this new military invention! Greetings from the Philippines
@jacob017113 жыл бұрын
He's gonna give people heart attack with those hide and seek moments
@cephalonbob153 жыл бұрын
probls the only kills this thing's gonna rack up
@shanechandler10183 жыл бұрын
In a smaller scale , pleased to introduce your new sidewalk peace officer .
@industrialdesign29693 жыл бұрын
Please clarify what you mean.
@shanechandler10183 жыл бұрын
@@industrialdesign2969 soon drones and robots like those at Boston dynamics and even one's like that will patrol the streets all interconnected not to protect the law but to inforce a sense of unease further taking humans away from what makes them human . there connection there peace and above all else there love ,it is happening now and has been happening for a long time .
@industrialdesign29693 жыл бұрын
@@shanechandler1018 Let's hope for positive...
@shanechandler10183 жыл бұрын
@@industrialdesign2969 huh
@markdaniellegarcia13623 жыл бұрын
performance looks good,but what about building efficiency and cost?
@youraveragedog91613 жыл бұрын
looks like something straight out of command and conquer
@brianhenderson-tx9mc2 ай бұрын
I would love to have one of those machines ❤❤❤❤😮😮😮😮💯💯💯💯 for my collections.
@splendensregan52703 жыл бұрын
that's good for RC toy
@odthegreatest3 жыл бұрын
I wonder where you are going to put all the actuators and hydraulics that are required to power the systems shown and I don't even mention the space necessary for the engine, space for the fuel/fuel cells required. Last but nıt least, ammunition? Edit: I wrote this comment mid-way into the video and didn't even see the wheels... Wheels for a crawler machine. I believe there will be propellers on Version 2. Nice animation, cheers.
@thorfinnroar86723 жыл бұрын
legit looks like something out of command and conquer
@Evgeny_3723 жыл бұрын
Выглядит потрясающе!
@ГригорийСушков-э5и3 жыл бұрын
Ага. Только вес такой что никуда не годится. Или если не вес, то броня картонная.
@industrialdesign29693 жыл бұрын
Спасибо!
@homemurso14842 жыл бұрын
In my opinion, armoured vehicles will become more and more automated or remotely operated. Compact, faster, highly maneuverable and flexible tactical vehicles, capable of fast, coordinated, precise and decisive attacks, will probably be the most efficient and rational way to go.
@crispyboi40623 жыл бұрын
its quality but like the Panther the frontal armour its angled right to a flat plate which means a shell could bounce right into the center of the vehicle that and HEAT-FS would have huge fun with this
@meongman34853 жыл бұрын
Awesome Mini tank...its machine to bring peace not a war ..
@ieattuna3 жыл бұрын
how do you power it? how fast is it how important is it
@GabrielMoura-gt9jb3 жыл бұрын
The ammo for the 12,7mm is kinda exposed but its still easy to shoot it off
@ohayoch.3 жыл бұрын
i mean its a good tank or APC concept but in reality those tracks would be the main target by infantry and the main components are too exposed to the outside environment and mostly its way too complex like imagine trying to repair that thing.
@Renaissance-fw1ox3 жыл бұрын
Looks like a fancy coffin to me. There’s no substantial armor The tracks don’t look like that can go over anything that isn’t paved If it’s electric the battery getting it will be game over You need a PhD to pilot the damn thing There’s nowhere to store ammo or reload it easily Looks cramped as hell An IED Hell even a toe popper would blow the crap out of it And finally I can’t see a single job that will do well, not anti-aircraft not antitank not anti-personnel unless they’re in a middle of a field you can’t clear building with it and I bet the moment it hits mud or sand it will cease to function.
@futuredesigner79204 жыл бұрын
Excellent
@industrialdesign29693 жыл бұрын
Thank You Very Much!
@onder59683 жыл бұрын
Valla pes ağzım açık kaldı. Bunu kim tasarladı ise helal olsun.
@industrialdesign29693 жыл бұрын
Thank You very much!
@mahi98goodguy3 жыл бұрын
Looking forward to use it.... In call of duty😁😁
@jagdishjena90583 жыл бұрын
Superb
@industrialdesign29693 жыл бұрын
Thank You!
@luigilaput85023 жыл бұрын
Innovative and creative idea
@tylerduff1003 жыл бұрын
So many moving parts so many points if potential failure.
@silversnake43953 жыл бұрын
every gangsta till the tank be looking around walls
@evicol21173 жыл бұрын
I don't know it's purpose, and I know less of how the materials hold up or how much engine you can fit into that little thing alongside ammo for two machine guns. But what I can give you an opinion on is that one or two well placed large caliber shots can mess up those fancy hydraulic piston cabin real quick. Even if I'm wrong, this can fail in more places. Stop trying to do everything at once and have multiple variants for different purposes in a squad. You know, like humans do.
@hmmmintresting37703 жыл бұрын
I mean they could have just taped a gun onto a roomba but they just have to show off don't they.
@Xani-Mator3 жыл бұрын
The question is It can dodge or escaped from the Missile or tank?
@infinity52883 жыл бұрын
Can it dodge or escape from a missile or tank*
@jeffrey_young5633 жыл бұрын
Titanfall is the best example of the future warfare
@ImieNazwiskoOK3 жыл бұрын
How can that thing be stable? Also Because of complexity it would probably break a lot and be hard to repair.
@jackwincent93643 жыл бұрын
For the sake of the future, I think we should create too many tanks like this
@LordSignur3 жыл бұрын
jack of all trade = master of none
@Necrodermis3 жыл бұрын
the peek a boo tank
@INWMI3 жыл бұрын
looks cool, but too many moving parts equals to many posible failures in combat, i also would take out the pilot and use a remote control, you have already hunter killer plataforms with atgm and cannons in smaller version
@DonVigaDeFierro3 жыл бұрын
Looks really good, but there is a reason vehicles with threads in tandem aren't used... I don't remember that reason, though...
@judeartsnpaints3 жыл бұрын
nice
@ViceCoin5 ай бұрын
Needs ekectrified razor wire protection.
@СергейЕрмоленко-ц3б3 жыл бұрын
С ним даже воевать не придётся сам по дороге развалится.
@industrialdesign29693 жыл бұрын
Это концепт. Концепты не разваливаются... :)
@андрейфомин-т5н3 жыл бұрын
@@industrialdesign2969 На данный момент времени, слишком технически сложный и ещё долго будет проигрывать узкоспециализированным видам техники. По сути это вариант экзоскелета.
@СергейИванов-ф8л5в3 жыл бұрын
красиво конечно но не реализуемо .с тем количеством гидроприводов некуда девать помпу и масленый бак а ещё куда то нужно втиснуть генератор и блок электроники с гироскопами автор модели об этом забыл ( ну и гидроприводы не самая быстрая вещь сама по себе , что делает эту малютку мишенью ) не можно отказаться от кабины пилота и втиснуть всё перечисленное туда , но это не исправит положение ( попытка сделать конструкцию "универсальной" не всегда себя оправдывает ).
@industrialdesign29693 жыл бұрын
Спасибо за уделенное внимание! Целью проекта было концептуальное видение архитектоники боевого робота...
@igorgetz79033 жыл бұрын
@@industrialdesign2969 по мне это бред наивно всё.
@Krieg_Sherren5 жыл бұрын
Looks like it's for anti - Air perposes.
@industrialdesign29693 жыл бұрын
Including! :)
@Freedom-yz7dn3 жыл бұрын
It may look cool, but there are a lot of design flaws and mistakes here. Why 6 tracks instead of just 2? Just because you can 3D model a tank doesn't mean you can design a good one. Fortunately, most people aren't terribly obsessed with reality and go with what looks nice, going off various popular media franchises.
@TheCrowncard3 жыл бұрын
"PRESS Q AND E TO LEAN LEAFT AND RIGHT"
@notveryartificial44863 жыл бұрын
Looks kinda overcomplicated - too many systems may go wrong, also kinda difficult to reliably motorize that many moving parts
@luizcarlosrodrigues61722 жыл бұрын
quando a munição acabar vira um alvo muito facil.
@酒田陽仁3 жыл бұрын
"The Rook, an armored critical incident vehicle 2013" KZbin LOOK!! This is REAL.
@i_am_jarvistm72203 жыл бұрын
... The fact that I actually have a fictional tank design (VERY science fictional, as in utilizing many small-ish RTGs for engine power (each wheel of the track is powered by an encased pair of them to accommodate for the expected low output) and plasma-based weaponry (takes up the entirety of the turret to supply two cannons) that's ALSO called "The Rook" has me slightly uncomfortable...
@酒田陽仁3 жыл бұрын
@@i_am_jarvistm7220 How many kilometers is the equipment?
@i_am_jarvistm72203 жыл бұрын
@@酒田陽仁 Do- ... Do you not know what RTGs are? Wait, right, I should probably assume not since- Right... RTGs (or Radioisotopic Thermoelectric Generators) are not necessarily limited by distance, but by lifetime, because they're essentially a PASSIVE variant to nuclear energy compared to the ACTIVE reactors you may well be aware of. They're also safer and MUCH more compact as well, you could practically make them whatever size you want, hypothetically, or at least to my knowledge. Anyways, the lifespan and shielding required in the encasing depends on the fuel source. With the source I looked up when researching this providing examples, the most ideal one that stood out to me was Plutonium (low shield + 88-year half life), though there are safer options as well as MUCH more powerful ones (though these would require a lot more shielding), but essentially this is the safest "middle ground." I'm not familiar with their usage in real life, but the concept certainly seems viable in this case.
@tiwersan3 жыл бұрын
прямо как в анимэ
@miles23782 жыл бұрын
Wasent this the thing butcerd in oo gundam because they would not run away?
@shovrik3 жыл бұрын
Такую хрень легко с пистолета уничтожить перебил целиндры жидкости и она больше не сможет так выглядывает за стены
@DESIBOY-fe7nm4 жыл бұрын
Impressive.
@industrialdesign29693 жыл бұрын
Thank You Very Much!
@doopedoog5 жыл бұрын
Yeah good luck with that! :)
@industrialdesign29693 жыл бұрын
Thanks! :)
@emiliocartes53273 жыл бұрын
Maravilloso
@industrialdesign29693 жыл бұрын
Gracias!
@zeusmarkula4580 Жыл бұрын
🙌license and registration ..ce vou plait😈
@mohdnaser13373 жыл бұрын
❤❤👍
@zetoboogaloo88023 жыл бұрын
Looks to complicated and easy to destroy. I mean good luck but that would never be considered in the military.
@industrialdesign29693 жыл бұрын
Yes, this is a creative concept!
@thisguyderrick67823 жыл бұрын
Might be a lil to expensive
@markvortix54553 жыл бұрын
There's too much stuff on it It will make it much more difficult to control And very heavy
@splac38413 жыл бұрын
therefore unreliable
@bluehunter99103 жыл бұрын
bruh i know this shit is old but its so stupid that the Type 61 and Magella from mobile suit gundam made more sense
@sauraroy13463 жыл бұрын
another imagination.........
@akimbo45083 жыл бұрын
Need so many money for one of this bot/drone
@centraoctiles3 жыл бұрын
But, *I thought it was a lego tank design*
@ViceCoin5 ай бұрын
Tanks will control robots.
@vishal5063 жыл бұрын
Lets think it through, you know your enemy bought 100 of these, u only need to buy 1 or watch this video to study its vulnerability. These are just concept videos.
@alexshu16093 жыл бұрын
Гладко было на бумаге ))))
@fukushimaisrevelation28173 жыл бұрын
Tachikoma
@georgeargolo63103 жыл бұрын
SOKHUMI MILITARY ROBOT CONCEPT of GOOD 😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ of USA 🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲.
@TheBerlioZzz3 жыл бұрын
и работает эта супер-пупер технологичная хреновина до первого прилета РПГ
@АлександрКакушкин-л9ж3 жыл бұрын
Скорее всего до РПГ она не доедет. Судя по компоновке, в ней двигатель не предусмотрен.
@Tommisterio223 жыл бұрын
this is a really good concept
@Aryan-km6xq3 жыл бұрын
Hail hydra!!!!
@kennyli21764 жыл бұрын
Not enough space for ammo
@industrialdesign29693 жыл бұрын
Everything is provided conceptually...
@DUYnguyen-rp5nr3 жыл бұрын
how does those 4 small wheel lift all that weight
@industrialdesign29693 жыл бұрын
Hydraulic escape wheels.
@razvaluha51483 жыл бұрын
Где спрятан ядерный реактор,чтобы всё это работало?
@industrialdesign29693 жыл бұрын
В литиевых акумулляторах, которые легко меняются :)
@AsimosTriouss3 жыл бұрын
2:35 Your in a R6S Ranked match
@Felevr3 жыл бұрын
inpractical
@joseseabra93074 жыл бұрын
VOUS CROYEZ QUE VOUS ÊTES LES PLUS FORTS DU MONDE AVEC TOUTE VEUX TECHNOLOGIES VOUS ÊTES DANS L'ERREUR LEURS QUE ALLAH AURA DÉCIDÉ TOUTE VEUX TECHNOLOGIES NE FONCTIONNERONT PLUS VOUS SEREZ ALORS OBLIGÉS DE VOUS BATTRE CORP ACORP _ LA ET LA VÉRITÉ 🤲🇩🇿
@industrialdesign29693 жыл бұрын
Que Dieu bénisse tout le monde, frère!
@joseseabra93073 жыл бұрын
OUI NOUS SOMMES DANS LE TEMPS ESCHATOLOGIQUE BIENTÔT LA FIN _ LA ET LA VÉRITÉ 🤲🇩🇿
@industrialdesign29693 жыл бұрын
@@joseseabra9307 Que Dieu nous aide tous!
@mokka11153 жыл бұрын
Quel est le fuck?
@электро-лис3 жыл бұрын
И как ему одному отвечать за столько функций? Он будет перегружен, боевая эффективность почти 0. Да и ходовая часть вызавает вопросы. Зачем было делать 3 гусеницы на борт? Да еще и оставлять промежуток, в котором аппарат может сесть на днище? Дорого и неэффективно. Про бронированме даже спрашивать не буду, там много брони не влезет. Хотя огромный лобовой триплекс станет прекрасной мишенью для ослепления боевой единицы. Да и подвески нету, значит танк будет тряский как первые mk1 и последующие танки этой серии.