FZI Technique Application in Reservoir Evaluation

[@pedromunoz5276]

Excellent !! Thanks a lot for sharing :)

[@hodaadel6080]

Great thanks, but please where is the second part of this lesson?

[@dhanurRDA]

جزاك الله خيرا، بارك الله فيك

[@zeidamara_Geoscience]

Could you please share with us the next part which you mentioned for completing that with Petrel , your explanation is meaningful

[@mohammadkeshtkar9655]

Thanks for your helpful video, as always, Looking forward to more useful videos from you brother👏

[@geoscienceskills4839]

Thank you

[@salamaziz6123]

@@geoscienceskills4839 could you please shear the second part of this video with us ? thanks a lot for your useful video

[@razo786]

Thanks for the presentation, but my question is how to deal with the problem of different order of magnitude with the same porosity for example in group 4, where we have 100 md vs. 1000 md range. Will this mask those 1D subunits, and I think what will be interesting how to deal with non cored wells?

[@geoscienceskills4839]

since it is Carbonate Reservoir, then it is highly expected to find different order of magnitude. FZI is applicable in such kind of reservoirs especially if Fractures are involved. so I think changing the dispatch of data and reduce the magnitude is controlled by type of representation equation selected (Linear, Power, Logarithmic,...etc). regarding distribution in non-core wells what we need is a representative rock unit for each FZI. Having FZI only is the first part of RT process ,, second is to answer why Por-K core data show this behavior. once rock units have been identified then we can use calculator to distribute FZI to non-cored wells.

[@jeromeeusebius]

Great video. Can you share the excel file used for the analysis. Thanks.

[@danielhassani5368]

Thanks a lot that was quite helpful for my thesis

[@koksalan75]

Thanks for the video. Here I have couple questions: 1. How did you define the limits of each FZI? Can we define each fzi from 0 to 0.5, 0.5 to 1, 1 to 1.5 etc as well? 2. Why do we have different por-perm values in each fzi, meaning we have high pot-perm and low pot-perm values. what is causing this? 3. Some samples (values) in group 2 for example are better than group 3 samples, meaning they have better por-perm values than some of group 3 samples. Why is that?

[@Nhau1902]

CAN YOU DO AN EXAMPLE ABOUT HIGHLY COMPLEX RESERVOIR SUCH AS CARBONATES WITH DOBLE TRIPLE POROSITY HOW THE PERMEABILITY BEHABES ? CAN YOU SHARE THE EXCEL, PLEASE?? OR WHERE CAN WE FIND THIS K AND POROSITY DATTA?? REGARDS FROM MEXICO!!! THANKS!!

[@geoscienceskills4839]

To my knowledge... I have been through 2Phi-2k system reservoir. The double porosity-permeability is associated with presence of Fractures. I think the triple system where u will have different Kx, Ky, Kz in three dimensions is truly interesting subject and I will be happy if u can share case studies if u have 🙂

[@alialmuntaser4476]

Thanks for this valuable video. I have just a question can we apply the same technique for multiple wells to capture the lateral vartion and por./perm. in carbonate rock.

[@geoscienceskills4839]

Yes u can... As We have more petrophysical data from wells... The better and more rubost results we get that reflect lateral and vertical of reservoir properties

[@mohammedmohammed-ox7jn]

Thanks for this Video and your effort, could you please explain how to Predict FZI in uncored wells.

[@geoscienceskills4839]

Actually this method enables you to predict FZI in uncored wells. You just need to quality control when you are done with FZI propagation in the model.

[@isabellarios4451]

@@geoscienceskills4839 which is the name of the video explaining how to propagate FZI in the model? Thanks in advance

[@davidalfons507]

@@geoscienceskills4839 Hi Sir. Would you like to demonstrate rock typing with combine log and core data in petrel? I just confuse to apply it with Petrel software. Thanks in advance sir. 🙏

[@rempitizm]

Thank you very much for this interesting video. Really appreciate if you could provide the Excel file in Google Drive for example. Thank you again for your video here.

[@atifismail391]

Thanks a lot for video. I want to add some thing, since the porosity is in %. So use Phiz =Phi/100-Phi and in the calculation of RQI, you need to convert into Dec; RQI = 0.0314*(K(md)/Phi(Dec)). kindly correct me if I am wrong. Regards,

[@تعرفمعنا-ض9ث]

thank you very much

[@marsifying]

thank you

[@charaichavo3056]

Very Good

[@luc7478]

But Why we hear that Rock typing is associated with ML/DL

[@AhmedSayedMohamed]

لو تم شرحه بالعربي كان يبقي ممتاز كما باقي الفيديوهات السابقة

[@DunkinTunic]

059 Johnathon Brook

[@geoscienceskills4839]

؟؟؟