I like to picture a man with very tiny tweezers just plucking away at a piece of gallium going "one germanium, two germanium"
@ChrisspruАй бұрын
and laughing "ah-ah-ah!" from time to time.
@seanhewitt603Ай бұрын
I'm thinking the molecular weight changes...
@enlightendbelАй бұрын
That's how you trap a Leprechaun.
@UnmannedairАй бұрын
Hate to burst your bubble, but we're talking individual atoms of germanium. What they're doing is they're taking a sample and they're putting it through mass spectroscopy and measuring ratios. They're not actually counting individual atoms.
@KelnxАй бұрын
@@Unmannedair Ahhh...you're one of those people who literally fact-checks jokes.
@StasKubrakАй бұрын
I used to work on BEST as a student, have written trigger program in C++ to detect certain neutrino events. Nice to hear that old place still is relevant for modern science 😊
@douglasstrother6584Ай бұрын
I bet they are *still* running your code.
@MrWaalkmanАй бұрын
@@douglasstrother6584 If it works, don't fix it.
@przemekkobel4874Ай бұрын
@@douglasstrother6584 Maybe they all run it, and the reason for this new physics is some C++ compiler issue.
@salty_cucumberАй бұрын
@@douglasstrother6584if it works don't touch it unless you should
@LoLaSnАй бұрын
@@douglasstrother6584 Don't fix it if it ain't broke
@NikkiTrudelleАй бұрын
If there were ever a Nobel prize for science communication it should go to Anton for sure
@talananiyiyaya8912Ай бұрын
No it wouldn't...
@IgnacioGoukАй бұрын
The Nobel Prize is a meme...
@h.c5750Ай бұрын
Unfortunately the nobel prize has been given to soms truly horrible people so its not really the accolade it once was
@Songbird645Ай бұрын
@@h.c5750 Who are you refering to?
@greg_one_izmАй бұрын
@@talananiyiyaya8912 OP didn't say "would" they said "should"
@ericclubb3761Ай бұрын
This is one of my favorite science channels. Your one of the only channels I know about, who talk abou new discoveries, that aren't complete bs clickbait and you actually use real pictures. You, John Micheal Godier, Vsauce, and PBS Spacetime are my favorite science channels.
@kaminachos5129Ай бұрын
Isaac Arthur is awesome too
@DJRonnieGАй бұрын
I found it hard to watch Avi Loeb after the third time on JMG's Event Horizon. After looking into Loebs work, I realized he basically has no actual evidence to support his assertions.
@lorenzoblum868Ай бұрын
Periodic video
@m4rvinmartianАй бұрын
Vsauce is a shill
@Duane_DayАй бұрын
Avi Loeb might always be seen as a crackpot for as long as no undeniable proof comes in. maybe 250 or 500 years from now, someone might dig up the archives and say, 'Remember how they mocked that Loeb guy? Turns out he was right.' Ijust like with Giordano Bruno, who was ridiculed and even executed for his ideas about the universe, later to be proven correct about many things.
@dgermain001Ай бұрын
I love how precise the whole physic thing is so that small discrepancies in niche experiment can spark wild new discoveries.
@JohnDoe-qz1qlАй бұрын
The thing is that the discrepancies aren't small.
@NthnLikeCodeineАй бұрын
@@JohnDoe-qz1ql yeah that’s what he’s saying genius 😭
@noether9447Ай бұрын
@@NthnLikeCodeinehe literally did say small tho genius
@aladdin8623Ай бұрын
So much for the absolute truths in scientific theories 😅
@bjornfeuerbacher5514Ай бұрын
@@aladdin8623 No one ever said that there is "absolute thruth in scientific theories", what are you talking about?
@wotireckonАй бұрын
Hope you don't mind I sent a right-handed thumbsup.
@pierluigidipietro8097Ай бұрын
That was good 😂
@pnf197Ай бұрын
i'll counter that with a neutral thumbs up (ie, nothing)
@hudnixАй бұрын
Wait, you're on to another anomaly! KZbin only has right-handed thumbs! Where are the left-handed thumbs?
@patrickdonahue4533Ай бұрын
In some cultures that is a swear word 😂
@colebengston3963Ай бұрын
Unexplained physics involving Gallium? Never clicked on a video faster!
@user-xj5xp6qz5gАй бұрын
@ProbablyYoMamaАй бұрын
Looked up the Hutchinson effect?
@bobkorouaАй бұрын
Am I missing something?
@Cheesepuff8Ай бұрын
One time I saw a vid called horse kicks tree and farts on dog then runs away and I clicked on that pretty fast
@oddvertexАй бұрын
Same my man same!
@ImOverEveryoneАй бұрын
This is what happens when I forget I took my meds and I take them twice. Oh wait that's Valium
@BackYardScience2000Ай бұрын
😂
@stalbaumАй бұрын
A winner
@carriefu458Ай бұрын
@jimtroeltsch5998Ай бұрын
Valium is way cooler than Galium
@ProbablyOnLSD6669Ай бұрын
A considerably cooler substance. Edit: someone beat me to it goddamnit
@KippinCollarsАй бұрын
The Gallium Anomaly is the name of my last psychedelic jazz album. Very popular in Japan.
@chaunceyfeatherstone6209Ай бұрын
Hai! Arigato!
@panetierbread3510Ай бұрын
j-fusion album drop when?
@johndawson6057Ай бұрын
Just looked it up on google. Damn bro.
@KippinCollarsАй бұрын
@@johndawson6057 I know right? It changed the genre. It changed Japan. It changed physics.
@kurkulbc370Ай бұрын
Do you know the artists/bands name? For some reason I can't find anything by the album name alone
@JanghanHongАй бұрын
There was always something weird and mythical about room temperature liquid metals.
@louisanthesАй бұрын
I never thought so. There are liquid oceans of nitrogen on the outer planets, and iron rain on exoplanets. States of matter are arbitrary functions of temperature and pressure ...
@JohnnyWednesdayАй бұрын
There's nothing special about "room temperature" - all metals can be a liquid.
@noelstarchildАй бұрын
Who'd have thought, Hg sitting right there next to Au heh? Amazing power of a proton.
@MrMichiel1983Ай бұрын
@@louisanthes That's true for simple states of matter, but complex matter like DNA will not be stable at very high temperatures. So liquid metal can only interact with biological materials if it's room temperature.
@rfbftp123Ай бұрын
@@louisanthesfrom what they believe from the data collected... Give me a photo of iron rain 🤣 obviously its something like that but who knows what weird physics on other planets may make data look like. Scientists can only make conclusions using formulas discovered already..
@MagnumGreenPantherАй бұрын
20-24% less than expected. That tells you that there is a particle flavor that we don’t know about. Instead of a 1/3 it’s 1/4 or a 1/5
@birdnessАй бұрын
Cool ranch flavor I hope
@paulurban2Ай бұрын
All Dressed flavor
@thomasmount3530Ай бұрын
You sir, are thinking like a chemist! Good comment, got me thinking.
@bjornfeuerbacher5514Ай бұрын
"Instead of a 1/3 it’s 1/4 or a 1/5" Why should it be 1/3 ?!?
@MagnumGreenPantherАй бұрын
@@bjornfeuerbacher5514electron, muon, or tau. 1 as in one of the 3 known and expected flavors I was saying 1/3 as a representation of the expected particle ratio. If the fractional detection though is less than expected that implies the number of potential particles is higher than you initially predicted a 4 or a 5
@RKBaxterАй бұрын
You have the gift of presenting information in a format that is easy to understand. Don't retire, there is a lot more I want to learn.
@davidboyle1902Ай бұрын
How an experiment intended to study one phenomenon leads to insights in an entirely different arena is foundational science, and probably why there are so many people who don’t buy into it anymore. It’s simply too complex for lots of people. Easier to believe what your favorite politician has to say on the subject. A fascinating presentation well told. You are the man, Anton. And a wonderful one.
@andrewepp6763Ай бұрын
Crazy that people are able to think up these kinds of experiments. Humans can be pretty smart!!
@user-do6dl5gh1zАй бұрын
But most money still gets stolen by layers and economists and politicians
@filonin2Ай бұрын
@@user-do6dl5gh1z Some people like cucumbers better pickled. We're just mentioning random facts, right? No need to relate to previous posts at all, right?
@zenchessАй бұрын
@@filonin2 Some people like cucumbers, but the fact is Chess was invented in india thousands of years ago
@seanhewitt603Ай бұрын
It's like adventure, looong periods of boredom, followed by short, heart testing periods of excitement...
@ProbablyYoMamaАй бұрын
Jim Jeffries has a good analogy/joke for what you're saying
@jimcurtis9052Ай бұрын
Wonderful as always Anton. Thank you. ☺️👍
@speakeroftruth1952Ай бұрын
Left-handed neutrinos are more creative than right-handed neutrinos.
@Bob-of-ZoidАй бұрын
They have been discriminated against long enough!!!😁
@krzysztofkowalski2816Ай бұрын
they also shatter human rights better
@realfist1Ай бұрын
Hi Anton, Karl here from the UK. Hearing you mention right handed neutrinos reminded me of Neil Turok’s amazing lecture about (I believe) his ground breaking theories a few months ago. He pointed out that as these particles were much heavier than left handed neutrinos they were a likely candidate for dark matter. I urge you to watch his 2 hour (!) long talk/lecture on the KZbin ‘Theories of Everything’ channel entitled The Simple Theory That Explains Everything’. Enjoy!!
@cmbaz1140Ай бұрын
There is someone called turok? Dayum...
@deemo8578Ай бұрын
that smile gets me everytime. Always love the vids ty
@chrislong3938Ай бұрын
Heh... every time I hear the word 'Germanium' I think back to a Biggles novel I read as a child! Algy was planting Geraniums around their Quonset hut and Biggles dug them all up saying that he won't have Germaniuns growing at their base! This was the book when he first met Algy in WWI. A fun read for a kid!!! ... and yes! I'm American but grew up in the British WI. I'm probably one of the few Americans who knew what the hell Ian Anderson was talking about where in Thick as a Brick, he asks, "... and where the hell was Biggles, when you needed him last Saturday?"
@tanagra2Ай бұрын
Are you feeling ok today? Get yourself a nice cup of tea and lay down for a bit.
@HettieJansenVanVuurenАй бұрын
Aaaaaaahhhh the flowers!!!! Lovely imagination in comparison to winderful science!!! 🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸
@CharlesStearmanАй бұрын
You must be thinking of the story "The Battle of the Flowers" in which Algy plants some sunflowers which are destroyed by a German bomb, so in retaliation he bombs a patch of geraniums at a German airfield. It is included in the book "Biggles Pioneer Air Fighter" which also contains the story "The Boob" in which Algy makes his first appearance. This was the first Biggles book I ever read back in the 1960s and I still have my original copy.
@chrislong3938Ай бұрын
@@CharlesStearman That must be it! Man, it was so long ago! 1969 or so... I was about 11-12. I just remember the humor! I also remember that whenever Biggles took off, it was a cloudless sky in France! Living in Trinidad, I'd never seen a true cloudless sky and wondered if that was really possible. Then I moved back to California and yes(!) they are true! Now I'm in Colorado and there is always at least a little wisp of a cloud somewhere. Funny, the things that make an impression on a person... Thanks!
@dailynicoАй бұрын
Another Biggles fan 💥😊
@George-rk7tsАй бұрын
There's been talk of sterile neutrons for a long time. This time it might make sense. Stay wonderful, Anton
@WillArtieАй бұрын
yeah I remember listening to a science podcast years ago and they were talking about theoretical sterile neutrinos and their implications if real - almost a decade ago? Wonder when they were first proposed and why...
@bjornfeuerbacher5514Ай бұрын
*neutrinos
@D_037Ай бұрын
It is kinda funny how the Gallium experiment was made in a collaboration between Russia and America and they're looking for, Germanium.
@blijebijАй бұрын
It is :)
@ravenousvisagesАй бұрын
But Germany has no sense of humor?
@blijebijАй бұрын
@@ravenousvisages But we do :D
@xenuburger7924Ай бұрын
At first I read Geraniums and thought Геран-2
@blijebijАй бұрын
@@xenuburger7924 xD
@TheBluemanBennyАй бұрын
Thanks Anton. Awesome work as always!
@kd4pbaАй бұрын
Feels like we are so close to major breakthrough in so many areas all at once.
@numinous2506Ай бұрын
They'll use it to make new weapons to end the threat of war....
@jazzman5598Ай бұрын
Every time you answer 1 question in physics……a million more questions appear. Thanks Anton!
@michaelhutson6758Ай бұрын
The obvious follow up question to ask would be does any nucleus besides Gallium-71 show an anomalously low electron neutrino count? If not, what is so special about the Gallium-71 to Germanium-71 transformation?
@thomasmount3530Ай бұрын
i think thats lookupable but i want to know too
@wayneshirey6999Ай бұрын
I got to hear that adverb again that I've never heard anywhere else: intriguingly. Good video. Thank you.
@tonics7121Ай бұрын
Anton, you are a miracle of good genes and kindness. Super great combo. Thanks for being you.
@fastshutherАй бұрын
I'm always so happy of the advancements we are making, thank you so much Anton for making it possible for others to learn of these advancements, without you news wouldn't be so fast and accurate
@zach11241Ай бұрын
Gallium. It’s a short hand version of how I fail to talk with women: “Gal, I.... ummmm........”
@Xingqiwu387Ай бұрын
Anton is wonderful, as are his explanations and science news elaborations. I'm so happy I found his channel.
@AnotherTowerDevАй бұрын
Anton videos with "new physics" in the title are quite rare
@thomasmount3530Ай бұрын
So are white papers...
@4rrxw794Ай бұрын
I love the casual way Anton conveys the news of a potentially groundbreaking new physics😊
@alden1132Ай бұрын
I'd bet my last Germanium isotope that BEST is a backronym. The BEST bacronym!
@stephenelberfeld8175Ай бұрын
I remembered gallium was an important ingredient for something. As a Gemologist I used to run into articles about synthetic gallium garnets. I'd better look it up.
@henrythegreatamerican8136Ай бұрын
Best thing about these videos is they remind me how stupid I really am. Time for me to go hug an experimental astrophysicist.
@kevinroberts781Ай бұрын
You aren't stupid because of what they claim. We are stupid because we believe them.
@user-xj5xp6qz5gАй бұрын
ugh, thats so lame, man.
@DaPikaGTMАй бұрын
@@kevinroberts781 No, you are just a contrarian fool.
@noob19087Ай бұрын
Not how stupid you are, but how much you still have to learn. How much we all still have to learn.
@bjornfeuerbacher5514Ай бұрын
@@kevinroberts781 Why do you think that people are stupid for believing scientists?
@aardvard116 күн бұрын
Love your work Anton. You are a born teacher. Much love your way from Australia.
@LordDustinDeWyndАй бұрын
Howdy from Temple, Texas, USA!
@pazitorАй бұрын
Fascinating, as always. Thanks, Anton.
@blobrana8515Ай бұрын
Exciting news. Sterile neutrinos were not top of the list for a dark matter candidate - until i heard about this.
@mikewlazlinski4309Ай бұрын
So quick question. Isn't dark matter just a term that describes an undiscovered mass of something. So wouldn't any new particle or whatever they find be what dark matter is in general?
@blobrana8515Ай бұрын
@@mikewlazlinski4309 if it isn't normal baryonic matter then any new particle discovered would be dark matter. Dark matter could composed of many different types of particle.
@southsideronnieАй бұрын
Always fascinating videos! Thank you for sharing Anton!!
Excellent presentation. I think I actually understood it. Thanks
@debrainwasherАй бұрын
A new, non detectable allegedly inert and possibly heavy neutrino is like unobtanium, a tachyon or negative mass with repulsive gravity. If the hypothesized particle does not interact with any matter but only spacetime, I guess, it would not be a terribly bad idea to weigh the gallium in small portions and the mass of the whole gallium content in the detector. If there is a difference, an interaction with the mass can be assumed. Interferometry is also an option.
@spvillanoАй бұрын
I remember back when neutrinos had yet to be detected in nature. Neutrinos were predicted in 1930, it wasn't until 1965 before they were detected in nature. I also remember when the notion of a neutrino detector for supernovae was considered an absurdity, not detection is routine. Now, the puzzle on how to detect a sterile neutrino remains to be solved and an experiment that can detect them created, which could answer a significant number of questions in physics, including why there is so little antimatter in the universe.
@bjornfeuerbacher5514Ай бұрын
Since the neutrinos oscillate into another, this new type of neutrino is _not_ "non detectable" - you can detect it _indirectly_, but using appearance and disappearance experiments over different lenghts. "If the hypothesized particle does not interact with any matter but only spacetime, I guess, it would not be a terribly bad idea to weigh the gallium in small portions and the mass of the whole gallium content in the detector. If there is a difference, an interaction with the mass can be assumed." Sorry, I can't follow your train of thought. Could you please explain that further? "Interferometry is also an option." ??? That's even more unclear.
@debrainwasherАй бұрын
@@bjornfeuerbacher5514 Anton came up with the idea, this new type of neutrinos might be the long sought WIMP-particle. We know, dark matter does not interact with ordinary matter, but it bends spacetime. According to Relativity, a spactime-curvature is the cause of gravity. Provided, the conjecture is valid and the number of missing neutrinos is substantial, any oscillation of a neutrino into a WIMP should be detectable by presence of an additional spacetime-curvature in the vicinity of the detector. And there are two known means to detect a local spacetime-curvature: i) a balance, ii) Laser interferometry. E.g. LIGO uses this principle to measure tiny amounts of spacetime-contractions, caused by incoming gravitational waves from distant celestial objects. Since there is a strong interaction of known neutrinos with Ga, fewer neutrinos can flip into the alleged WIMP-state. This should create a locally negative (concave) spacetime-curvature.
@soundsoflife9549Ай бұрын
You would not be able to differentiate such an infinitesimal change in mass like this.
@debrainwasherАй бұрын
@@soundsoflife9549 Do not underestimate interferometry. E.g. LIGO has a sensitivity of h < 10E-23. If (I stress if) these sterile neutrinos are really as good at bending spacetime as these were able to create 27% of the apparent mass of the universe, a detection should be possible. It is only a matter of a proper design of a suitable experiment and collecting the funding.
@blijebijАй бұрын
Yes Gallium hits at a folding out of new physics insight of a unique perspective! Great video&great presentation, wonderful als always! Thank you!
@MyraSeavyАй бұрын
CooL stuff! 😎
@GoneDeeАй бұрын
ty for your time and your content, have a wonderful day
@Jokers_Yugioh666Ай бұрын
Cool find!
@joehagenmusicАй бұрын
Hey Anton! I love your videos SOOOO much I've been a huge fan for years! as an audio engineer and an advocate for accessibility, I'd love to suggest that you EQ up the upper frequencies (2khz and higher by 3-4db) and compress the voice audio as it is a bit muffled and quiet when compared to other channels on KZbin. If you don't know how to do this, then there are AI tools that can do it for you now, or u can learn how to do it online in just a few minutes. I know how busy you are, and I don't want to add more work for you, but like I said, it's an accessibility thing that can quickly and effectively make a positive difference for your viewers:) appreciate you so much my man! Thank u as always for making so many incredible videos!
@jurgenkranenburg1309Ай бұрын
how can sterile neutrinos explain dark matter if they keep oscillating into different neutrinos that have different mass? what am I missing?
@JosePineda-cy6omАй бұрын
If neutrinos spend about 20% of the time as massive sterile neutrinos, you could take the average amount of neutrinos in the galaxy and at any time ~20% of them are sterile neutrinos, adding total mass. It doesn't matter what state an individual neutrino is at, but the cumulative effects of all of them, altogether.
@bigfishoutofwater313518 күн бұрын
You're missing the same thing everyone else is: the dark matter 😉
@blend3rman796Ай бұрын
Hey Anton, just a small piece of feedback: your voice is a bit quiet on phone speakers. It is also a bit muddled and could use some post-production. Just my 2 sensors (ears)! 😅
@YellowKing1986Ай бұрын
Lots of bots lately folks. Curious times.
@droog8400Ай бұрын
If by curious you mean shithouse, then yes I wholeheartedly agree
@caejones2792Ай бұрын
My understanding of particle physics is in that novice valley where I _think_ I know what a sterile neutrino is supposed to be, but I have no idea how it could be possible. I assume from the description that the sterility refers to it losing its Weak field in exchange for significant mass? How does that work? And even if, would it really be enough mass to account for dark matter? It sounds interesting, but it also sounds ... confusing, to someone whose knowledge on QM comes primarily from Hyperphysics and KZbin.
@mellertid6 күн бұрын
As far as I understand, the idea to solve the gallium anomaly is *light* sterile neutrinos that could *not* account for (all) dark matter. But will still make a mess in cosmology.
@JohannesSkolaudeАй бұрын
Holy ****p you have an AI infection in your comment section. Some AI is Cat fishing you Bro.
@RyanMacWeeАй бұрын
Yer an ai
@samuelgarrod8327Ай бұрын
Holy what?
@jonaseckert6926Ай бұрын
That's in every commentsection atm tbh
@emuhillАй бұрын
@@samuelgarrod8327 Know any 5 letter words that in in p? Admittably I can't think of any such word.
@ChelimYrnehАй бұрын
♥ ( also impressed with the graphics behind Anton ; WHO does these amzing graphics ? Unsung heroes . . .
@dantreviso4753Ай бұрын
Frikin' bots are everywhere.👾
@WhiskerBiscuit1Ай бұрын
Beep boop boop boop beep?
@bernhardlesche3283Ай бұрын
Neutrinos are ordinary Dirac-particles and therefore they have also a righthanded component. In the sun they are created purely lefthanded. But the massterm in Dirac's equation couples the left and the right components and therefore the particle will not stay lefthanded. With a nonzero mass neutrinos can have a magnetic moment and in the presence of a magnetic field and oscillating electromagnetic fields a spin-flip is possible.
@aquanano1Ай бұрын
This is like in Genesis: Adam was created first, but somehow a part of Adam became Eve. Or maybe I have eaten too much watermelon...
@bernhardlesche3283Ай бұрын
Think of the amplitue of the electron-electron-neutrino field as an element of the direct sum of the following tensor products: the lefthanded spinor cpace L times a two-dimensional flavor cpace l, on wich the weak interaction acts as SU2, and a righthanded spinor space R times a flavor space r, on which the weak interaction does just nothing. So psi is an element of Lxl + Rxr. The gamas in Dirac's equation map L into R and R into L. So the result of the application of the derivative operator in Dirac's equation is an element in Rxl+Lxr. Therefore the mass, that is the Higgs, has to be a mapping that maps l into r and r into l. @@aquanano1
@Natsukashii-RecordsАй бұрын
Edit: Why are bots arguing under my comment? 😭 Man, Anton is the type of guy that seems to really struggle putting himself out there but his love for sharing scientific things with others is so big that it trumps any introverted need he has. Wish I was him. :(
@esecallumАй бұрын
Vote Trump for President
@jastrapper190Ай бұрын
You would think with as “smart” as we have become… we would B smart enough to understand what the 25th amendment was and why it’s needed.
@jss1328Ай бұрын
@esecallum All you do is denounce science and spam politics. Pathetic.
@n1k0n_Ай бұрын
Jesus Christ...Can we not bring politics into everything?
@jastrapper190Ай бұрын
@@n1k0n_ when your friends are blown into tiny pieces trying to carry out the orders of an c0rrupt sea Nile turd…. And then that same man “forgets” the sacrifice… excuse me if I think we’re discussing and investing time into ridiculous things.
@WiddleWeeWee16 күн бұрын
Absolutely a breakthrough. It’s what I call the grape seeds that gave us apples. A long time ago a theory popped up on origins of matter and it’s diversity and it had to be that it was not made that way but destined to be. Like a seed used to pull pure quartz or silicon . Amazing news and it potential to reveal another assumption/theory that dark matter isn’t a one size fits all but it’s as unique and the midway point for unexplainable inconsistency in the imbalance with certain particles ratio within the known universe as well as the purpose of reservoir of materials perhaps yet not introduced in our timeline yet .
@m4rvinmartianАй бұрын
*"The Science is Settled"* *"New Physics"*
@christopherbrice5473Ай бұрын
The king is dead.
@VainerCactus0Ай бұрын
If someone says the science is settled, you need to follow the money, not the science.
@bleack8701Ай бұрын
Long live the new king @@christopherbrice5473
@bjornfeuerbacher5514Ай бұрын
@@VainerCactus0 So if someone says "the science is settled on the question if the Earth is flat", you think we have to follow the money? Seriously?
@bjornfeuerbacher5514Ай бұрын
Err, no physicist ever said that the science is settled about neutrino physics.
@pyr3x8492 күн бұрын
I absolutely love Gallium! It's one of the coolest metals to play with!
@relativity651118 күн бұрын
Anton's delivery is outstanding
@FrancisFjordCupolaАй бұрын
Put the sample in the mass-spectrometer, Gordon!
@singinginthedark2786Ай бұрын
seems like a simple explanation to me, that is if you are wording things correctly, if a neutrino is in a constant state of superposition, then it is a electron, a proton and nothing, all at once, so the missing numbers are from the neutrinos that pass while they are nothing. if it can exist in superposition then it can exist in a state of inactivity. think about it, it can be a electron which is negatively charged and a proton that in positively charged, then it can exist with a neutral charge as well as no charge at all. that is what superposition mean in the end, just like in the double slit experiments, it is all based on the act of perceiving the neutrino and the observer measuring it. by measuring it you are changing its state
@soundsoflife9549Ай бұрын
Has the gallium got some properties that can make neutrinos prefer a particular state?
@DocSanders20 күн бұрын
I completely concur on the whole issue of “new psychics,” since over the last 40 years I have had to look at these anomalies as, in effect, painting yourself into a corner. Or, the mathematical equivalent to a “you can’t get there from here” problem. Bottom line is that there is so much we still don’t know and, perhaps, will never know if we quit asking “WHY?” StayWonderful.
@reppich128 күн бұрын
SAGE was a critical clue in the to my 90s work in Cosmology. This same experiment needs to be run with Mercury. What we will find is that solar cores are 'cold' and Time-Curvature is higher than assumed. Dark Matter is a broad category. Something you get from entangled pairs existing in radically different curvatures. Thus they are mass unable to interact with it's surroundings, because one is in a near locked state relative to our observations.
@Chesterton7Ай бұрын
Fascinating summary, vaguely understood. Thanks.
@christophasАй бұрын
I really liked how you explained this topic. You managed really well to lead ones train of thoughts. You dropped the word "sterile" explaining the BEST experiment but it didn't rang a bell yet. But shortly before you mentioned sterile neutrinos, I sat here thinking "wtf - it's sterile neutrinos" and my eyes grew bigger. I was really happy when you confirmed my "insight". Great teaching! :)
@ciprianpopa1503Ай бұрын
You dragged us through mud with this explanation.
@christian_1701Ай бұрын
You guys know exactly what this discovery means! 🙏🏻
@paolabolognese3530Ай бұрын
Amazing! Very good informative video! 😊
@jcinthemountainsАй бұрын
Thanks Anton! Have a great day!
@StuffandThings_Ай бұрын
I really wonder if somehow the liquid phase of the metal is causing it to interact in unexpected ways, as absurd as that seems. For a liquid metal, you would have mobile ion cores in a mobile sea of electrons. For all we know, this causes neutrinos to act in unexpected ways. It would be pretty easy to rule out too, just freeze the gallium in a setup of the experiment (wouldn't have to be _that_ much colder to freeze it due to its moderate freezing temp) and see what happens. Would be a rather more mundane solution as opposed to unknown particles but still kinda interesting if neutrinos act weirdly with liquid metals.
@JosePineda-cy6omАй бұрын
Given the distances between nuclei, theoretically state shouldn't matter... but then, it's such an easy and cheap set up that i can't think of a reason NOT to do this experiment, if only to compare results
@pjaworek6793Ай бұрын
Wow thanks for excellent explanation! This missing neutrino problem creeps me out for some reason.
@zacattacx5637Ай бұрын
Man, your hair looks great
@szpiegzkrainydeszczowcow8476Ай бұрын
Great content as always Anton! Thank you!
@Khashayarissi-ob4yjАй бұрын
With luck and more power to you. hoping for more videos.
@charleshulsey3103Ай бұрын
That smile at the end 😂 Keep doing that, it's great 😁
@jnhrtmn10 күн бұрын
The Strong force kept them from having to theorize a reason why electric charge changes when crammed into a nucleus. Inventing fixes works in a crowd.
@matthewsheeranАй бұрын
It's funny: if 4 oscillating neutrino types 25% of the time in each state and the missing difference is -20-24% which is kinda suspicious or indicative IMO at least to a Baysian!
@daviddelaney363Ай бұрын
Nice video discussion. Anomalies are where to focus for sure.
@lukemckee9772Ай бұрын
Glad to see your still making videos, used to watch religiously great channel mate
@nhorvath74Ай бұрын
In order for conservation of energy to hold, shouldn't neutrinos that change flavors with different masses also change their velocities as they do so?
@skytron22Ай бұрын
No way we’re getting new physics before GTA VI
@aquanano1Ай бұрын
We do not even need new physics, but rather more hair and bigger ...icks, if we have GTA VI.
@riyaansheikh7470Ай бұрын
These physics better be in GTA 6
@JohnAlbertRigaliАй бұрын
I’m so looking forward to the debates over the next proposal(s) to modify the Standard Model of particle physics.
@falconadv1481Ай бұрын
Love this channel, thanks man!
@joseywales6168Ай бұрын
SpaceEngine callout in the description???? LETS GOOOOO I love space engine
@ghlscitel6714Ай бұрын
Neutrino-oscillations were discussed already in the late 19-7ties and experimentally confirmed in the 19-8ties.
@jim.franklinАй бұрын
Nice reporting Anton, thanks for another interesting, and intrigueing delve into the many physical mysteries we still have yet to solve. I love the fact that three seperate experiements came up with the same percentage anomaly, as statistically that is just not possible if the effects were anything but real effects. The lack of right handed neutrinoes has long been a mystery that has led many to suggest we are missing a number of fundamental particles from the "family tree", but I would raise a serious caution about linking any right handed particles to dark matter, we know dark matter appears to clump together, but there is no evidence suggesting any process that would cause any flavour of neutrino to behave in this way - we do not even know, for sure, what the mass is of neutrinoes! The problem lies with how neutrinos may acquire mass. Non zero neutrino mass is not possible without the existence of new fundamental fields, beyond those that are part of the Standard Model, we know virtually nothing about any of the particles that may be associated with them. They could be bosons , they could be fermions, they could be light or heavy, positively or negatively charged or they may be neutral -having no charge, they may experimentally accessible by methods we have yet to devise or they may be hopelessly out of reach with our current technology and understanding - they may be the key to understanding the full breadth of the standard model that we are currently missing, or they could be a rabbit hole that leads us nowhere helpful in resolving the standard model issues we clearly have. This is the neutrino mass puzzle. At its heart is the particle’s uniquely elusive nature, which is both the source of the problem and the main challenge in resolving it - so how this would impact the Gallium anomoly is a mystery and how it would impact the dark matter connundrum an even larger headache.
@horseracingfreetips7859 күн бұрын
The other 20% were cats, when they opened the chamber to count the Germanium atoms the cats vanished as per Heisenberg. Its a statistical anomaly from so few experiments. If they do the experiments a few thousand times the probability is that the cats will be there if they look 50% of the time.
@TheMysticPeteАй бұрын
Always insightful
@breakeverychain7Ай бұрын
Platinum is weird too. It is a pain killer. Yesterday my ring starting ringing very high pitch it was weird. Then a while later these ppl came to the house to steal something from the hard but they saw I was home… I’ve had a number of experiences from this metal.
@soundsoflife9549Ай бұрын
Gallium is very good at playing dodge-ball. That's why it can liquefy at such a low temperature!
@secretvoiceunlockedАй бұрын
O dont usually like your videos but this is a great one. Gallium we can learn much
@Null-ku1py23 күн бұрын
thank you for sharing ❤
@scoobysnax9787Ай бұрын
Wow, I have a piece of Gallium, never knew it was this amazing neutrino attractor. Although it is an amazing rock in my collection anyway, I value it even more now after this brilliant video. Thanks Anton, you are fantastic, I learn something everyday.
@aquanano1Ай бұрын
Now you know that you have some Germanium isotope, too...
@robertethanbowmanАй бұрын
The first place to look would be to confirm that Gallium converts to the exact degree to Germanium from solar neutrinos as much as the MODEL (not hard fact) says it does.
@dogprowilhelm7630Ай бұрын
We are talking about neutrinos as left handed spin and not antineutrinos as right handed spin? Gallium is a superconducting too, why not repeat the same experiments at hyper low temperatures for more sensitivity. Great subject, Anton ❤
@bjornfeuerbacher5514Ай бұрын
Huh? The experiment works by counting the Germanium atoms which are created when the neutrinos "hit" the Gallium nuclei. That Gallium is a superconductor at low temperature has precisely nothing to do with that.
@76StarshipАй бұрын
I hereby nominate Anton for the Nobel Price in KZbin Physics.
@bloodyorphanАй бұрын
Love your work Anton, power too you M8!
@RuneRelicАй бұрын
If its a wave, and its a collective synchronisation, assuming a 2D planar representation in 3D space might be the problem. ie 3D Tetrahedral (4 flavours) rather than 2D triangulated (3 flavours) resonance. Especially if they are all simple variable expressions (modes), of a single entity. Perhaps the harmonics are not all resonant with the other waves that manifest as reality, in our domain of existance (Constructive vs Destructive Superposition). Basically, entities are built from and coalesce via mutual resonance, but not all of the constituent harmonics (identity) are resonant (compound constructive & destructive interference).