Game Theory: Sequential Move Games

[@Hercules003]

The best sinple example on this topic. Thank you for posting.

[@JMRG2992]

It's impressive none of the videos of extended games form actually do the matrix of payoffs :/ it's so confusing to do them.

[@ujjwalsharma7283]

Thank you, Sir!

[@EconomicsinManyLessons]

You are welcome!

[@andreanicole7035]

I can't hear your audio

[@rafaelnava6741]

Thank you for the amazing video

[@ecitb3005]

Very helpful. Thank you

[@evlivin4god666]

Thank you thank you soooo muchhh😅 finally understand

[@brendanreeves9645]

But what if player 2 irreversibly 'locks in' his right choice somehow. Assume he writes his move down on a piece of paper, shows it to player 1, and submits his move in advance, thereby locking in 'right.' Now the game actually would be changed for Player 1 no? So perhaps player 2 has some leverage to win after all.

[@finneserrr]

that’s not rational for one

[@brendanreeves9645]

@@finneserrrhow so? If player two hypothetically ‘locks’ their move as right in advance irreversibly and player one knows this. At that point, P1 can play left and both get 0, or play right and win 5 while P2 wins 10, which he should do assuming he’s maximizing personal gain. How is this not a logical strategy for P2? Reminds me of nuclear deterrent strategy.

[@katherinejohns9974]

I understand the theory of SPNE (I knew it would come to 10,5 ) but I am stuck on the notation. Would the SPNE be represented as (Left, (Left, Right)) meaning player 1 plays left and player 2 plays left unless player 1 plays right then player 2 plays right? PLS HELP

[@finneserrr]

do yk now??

[@danishmaqbool8742]

Sir, plz can u share some pdf note on this topic, that is your utmost kindness.

[@asganawayaway]

Nice example about "cheap talk". Easy to grasp.

[@kimdean4508]

Hi do you by chance offer tutoring?

[@mukailarafiu2718]

Thanks a lot!

[@jakevendrotti1496]

Can't hear you

[@stuarttjl]

you need to speak louder

[@ExplorerSouvik]

Laora audio