GD&T Position Tolerance Lesson 2 - NO MATH

[@gar50172]

Thank you for such a thoughtful explanation and new way for me to look at gd&t so I appreciate your efforts. I’m a learn it on your guy so all the help out there is truly appreciated

[@MultiScramjet]

Figures are worth a thousand words, Thank you!

[@holdenrey4506]

you probably dont care but if you are stoned like me atm you can stream all the latest series on instaflixxer. Have been streaming with my brother for the last weeks :)

[@coltongenesis1517]

@Holden Rey Yea, been using instaflixxer for months myself :)

[@zaz4667]

SWEET. Just found lesson 2. LOVE the simplicity you convey and visuals you create!

[@mk123ify]

sir, you have done an awesome job...I really admire the effort u put in.. It helped me a lot in understanding the concept

[@oldschool1436]

Man! You are a great teacher!

[@Dariusz_Zemczak]

I even started to draw my own circles to understand, Thank You!

[@shengfuxu3578]

excellent work, really need to understand this to realise the rationale of gd&t

[@jenniferw4685]

Clear and straightforward. Thank you!

[@sanseng000]

Simply amazing 👍 Can't wait to watch the next one

[@jagroopsingh3297]

Intuitive....Well Done.....Bring More Of these....We need More Understanding

[@mostirreverent]

the angle then needs a part thickness requirement, since the hole would need to be larger it the angle extended for a longer distance at the miss aligned angle.

[@edwinguerrero3262]

Great explanation, keep up the work!

[@edwinguerrero3262]

Quint Crispin It’s great because I’m entirely new to this and this type of information is needed for engineering internships! Good luck on future videos

[@CuriousEngineer955]

Wow! It's just crazy explanation.

[@onurcanerdogu7421]

At 8:40 Top left corner of the right blue rectangular violates the boundry, doesnt it?

[@carbon273]

I wonder, does the varying orientation that you mention in this video correlate at all to the perpendicularity tolerance? If so, how would one correlate this tolerance to the position tolerance? Trigonometry?

[@lohithk.h4097]

Excellent.

[@thevegg3275]

I guess my question is how is it that a manufacturer can't hit a basic dimension precisely on a part every time but using GD&T they can stay precisely within these zones. Maybe they won't even be able to stay within a zone and GD&T would then fail. Is it because it is easier to hit a larger target? If so, why not just make the basic dimension larger? As in the dart metaphor, if you're trying to assure being inside a virtual zone then your dart still has to be inside the bullseye. The same amount of skill throwing is required.

[@praveens1516]

@QuintCrispin please answer this...

[@iKnoMuzik]

I’m a beginner but it’s all based on the size of your tolerance. Higher tolerance means higher cost. If you are working with low precision manufacture and you give them a high precision assembly to make, they will probably fail. But that’s not GD&T’s fault, it’s already baked in that they can’t execute high tolerances. So when you got a manufacturer, they will be able to tell you whether or not they can manufacture a product within the tolerances you designed. If they can, then GD&T will work at a higher rate then traditional because it tells you more about design intent