I used to draw radar predictions for F111 crews as a target intel guy.
@wp2746 Жыл бұрын
This is so cool😮
@trafficsignal1015 жыл бұрын
Now that brings back some memories. As a back shop avionics tech, I have worked on all those LRU's. There were a few errors in the video though. Mixing up the ARS and TFR mostly. The command bars are for the TFR system. Also the LARA was used over water as it gave a more correct altitude.
@thetreblerebel4 жыл бұрын
This was made by General Dynamics. I believe for training pilots ...
@rossjdaniel5 жыл бұрын
Great aircraft
@allandavis82015 жыл бұрын
I know quite a few people don’t rate the F-111 as a good aircraft, in my opinion they are wrong, for an aircraft that was so advanced for its time it was exceptional, put aside its in service problems and forget everything except the aesthetics and you have a stunning visual aircraft, if battles were won on looks then the USA would win every time, and not just for the F-111, America in my opinion have produced the best looking and effective aircraft for many decades now. Thanks for sharing. 🇬🇧
@packardexelence5 жыл бұрын
AS A NUCK BOMBER THE F-111 WAS SO FEARED BY THE SOVIETS THAT THEY INSISTED THAT THEIR NUMBERS BE COUNTED AS PART OF ANY S.A.L.T. TREATIES!!!!!!!!!!
@thetreblerebel4 жыл бұрын
It was a clear threat to Russian targets in Germany. It was made to do one thing. Fly below radar and bomb
@BornRandy625 жыл бұрын
The Navys AN/SPS 10 surface search radar had many of the same controls. A analog radar that was discontinued since the 55 is digital and works better with AEGIS. it may still be installed on older supply and auxiliary ships
@hughseagraves7036 Жыл бұрын
When I first started watching this I thought wow this is corny. But then I thought wow this is interesting because I used to want to be an Air Force pilot and might have been assigned to an F-111.
@allgood67603 жыл бұрын
Awesome vid.. thanks from NZ 👍🇳🇿
@davenone73123 жыл бұрын
Worked all F-111 models as Avionics at depot McClellan AFB ca for many years. Anyone else there?
@robertstack21443 жыл бұрын
I strain gaged them for cold proof testing.
@davenone73123 жыл бұрын
@@robertstack2144 A couple of back shop guys I knew worked that area. Freezing the wings then bending the heck out of them! It was Loud!
@robertstack21443 жыл бұрын
@@davenone7312 yes very loud when the wing broke. At GDFW we tested the static F-16 in the fixture at room temperature and it broke at 147% of ultimate load. That was loud. They pumped the room with the entire airplane in it down to -40 while pulling 6 gs i think .
@michaelwhaley61232 жыл бұрын
My dads freind dennis cochran used to tell us good stories when we were growing up i miss mclellan afb
@thetreblerebel4 жыл бұрын
For a long time they required 1000 hours fighter jet experience to be able to fly this aircraft. It's intensive and super dangerous. It could fly right into the ground if you weren't careful.
@i-..--..--..-i69852 жыл бұрын
I think a bunch of the losses during its debut deployment in Vietnam were “disappearances” I.e. they probably flew into terrain in the triple canopy jungle limestone karst regions of SE Asia in the dark and probably crappy WX conditions. Easy to get behind the curve in an aircraft that complicated and ridiculously fast at very low altitude. The coffin corner is microscopic at 500 knots and 200 feet altitude.
@jeraldsamuel55982 жыл бұрын
I thought this aircraft had some sort of terrain following radar, so how the heck could it be easily flown into the ground???
@briancooper21122 жыл бұрын
@@jeraldsamuel5598 yes it did. In 1968 F-111 were sent to Vietnam with bad wings and the Terrain Following Radar TFR, was bad. In 1972 wings repaired along with TRF updated as other problems fixed. It was a terrific plane. Very fast
@dkoz8321 Жыл бұрын
Somewhere there is a doding father who gave his one only son a Koenigsegg Jasko for his 17th birthday . To celebrate young man's unrestricted driver's license. Few days later the young man wrapped his Koenigsegg around a tree , with him and his hot girlfriend in it. Not even the carbon fiber safety cabin could save the pair. Lesson is. High performance requires high skill. High skill comes from experience and good judgement.
@dkoz8321 Жыл бұрын
@@i-..--..--..-i6985Aircraft Crew priorities during combat. As trained by USAF, RAF, French Air Force, and major NATO Allies. 1. Fly the aircraft 2. Navigate the aircraft. 3. Manage expendable resources (fuel, crew fatigue) and communications. 4. Defend the aircraft. 5. Offensively fight the aircraft . I.E. the mission objective . Always be evaluating WIN priorities. What's Important Now. Note that shooting missiles , dropping bombs, going guns , comes last.
@Anonymous798963 жыл бұрын
My Great Grampa Worked on that plane.
@starfleethastanks2 ай бұрын
Heatblur pls! We're begging you!
@tyroniousyrownshoolacez23473 жыл бұрын
Viet Minh hiding in tunnel with Ak and 12oz cold rice : "again, really?". F111$400billion bust: "got em cap! thank you sir may I have another "
@dkoz8321 Жыл бұрын
ASAR to F111 ground target radar. Hold my high speed digital circuitry.
@kylesenior5 жыл бұрын
Lol, that music. What time did the brass accept the new generation as music as here to stay?
@mickyday20082 жыл бұрын
Top bomber
@dkoz83213 жыл бұрын
Strike! The real Air Force. Everything else is a suppourt mission! InFlight Refuel . Suppourt mission HICAP . Suppourt mission Escort. Suppourt Mission Offensive Counter Air. Support mission Defensive Counter Air. Support mission. SEAD. Suppourt mission JTAC/TACP- Suppourt mission
@KirkHermary Жыл бұрын
Chair Force 👆🏻
@dkoz8321 Жыл бұрын
@@KirkHermary In a certain 5 sided ringed office building with its own ZIP and APO code, in overpriced Arlington, Va, . Yes it is . The more inner the ring , the more chair force is there. Then again not every zoomie can be Roger Ramjet. There is a need for Major Ayehowl, Colonel Sanders, and Gen. Brassbottom to enable and fund the supply chain, USO show, timely pay, orders, and forests of paperwork.
@Kurio713 жыл бұрын
Shouldn't the plane be called A-111? It's not a fighter at all
@davenone73123 жыл бұрын
The F model was. The FB not so much. Took SRAM out of the FB's called it a G and gave it to the Aussie's!
@Kurio713 жыл бұрын
@@davenone7312 We called them the C Model. Longer wings
@davenone73123 жыл бұрын
The G model we gave them was in addition to the C model they already had.
@brucewelty76843 жыл бұрын
Same problem with the F-117
@pauljensen5699 Жыл бұрын
Hello War Thunder players!
@yan24to5 жыл бұрын
Ln and Uh
@bruce7sv5 жыл бұрын
No wonder they need to guys seems like a pretty shit system
@bradepperson49213 жыл бұрын
What are you comparing that platform to? That was early 1960's technology, pretty shit hot if you ask me and I maintained those systems for 20 years on FB, A, F and E model aircraft. No other attack aircraft could do what the F111 could do as fast and as low in any weather with the bomb load it could carry. Spelling errors and ignorance don't lend credibility to you argument.
@davenone73123 жыл бұрын
@@bradepperson4921 And the 111's were a workhorse during the Gulf war!! Too bad we found the wingbox's cracked, thats what did them in.
@ek87103 жыл бұрын
@@davenone7312 what are the wing boxes and why did they crack?
@davenone73123 жыл бұрын
@@ek8710 That was the area where the wing attaches to the fuselage. They cracked due to heavy stresses put on them. The cost was way too high to replace them throughout the fleet. We stopped depot modifications right in the middle of production. In came flat bed trucks and started hauling them off. It was a sad day for the McClellan AFB F-111 workers for sure.