GENIUS ROULETTE SYSTEM JUST GOT 1,000 TIMES BETTER!🔥🔥

[@rodhandler]

Hope the ads are paying you well every video is trash

[@moochiekk]

I played roulette on local site for 40 days and it's almost never choppy, however, by following the color this will work on that site. I've seen 10 to 15 streaks of the same color way too often here.

[@emoe40]

Is it me or is it crazy to come to the table with 2000 just to play a one to one bet and end up betting 600 dollars on one color to recover 30 bucks. This is a true knucklehead system

[@etacarinae5558]

Agreed......These high negitive progression's and martingale methods will always bust you and even worst always betting against streaks. These people never learn.🙄

[@broomsticknick6202]

This system cheats! I've used it for over a year now. It's online A.I. controls it, use a system that covers most of the table leaving 4-6 number uncovered and it will eventually sometimes right away constantly hit those uncovered numbers 78 to 9 times in a row depleting you with all your fake money! It has done this time and time again to me when it is impossible for those numbers to keep constantly hitting over and over and over again the odds are like hitting the f****** lottery

[@ZoltanVizsi]

Rulett is a game like that or u just have to bet flat and big.

[@roberttassone7676]

Or triplegale just to win one unit! Madness!

[@kentuckwhite6701]

Exactly. This is why I will rarely, if ever, play 1:1 bets for more than 1 to 3 spins. But the people who play them, are the reason why casinos stay in business.

[@robertomarquez9217]

I consistently tell you that it makes no sense to switch colors after a win. Only switch after a loss. Try to ride the color streaks! As much as you do this, it seems like you would have caught him by now

[@michaelhaverstock7125]

If you monitor any wheel for 1 million spins, you will see there are exactly as many chops as there are repeats. There is no advantage to try and ride the streaks.

[@user-tp6kb9sm5h]

Going with the present trend I always hit both chops and streaks. And hit a higher percent of my bets than just staying on one.

[@cassandrathatsme4382]

There is zero difference. As a matter of fact, there is a tiny advantage to playing the opposite color as no color will hit forever. The more hits any even paying bet gets, the more likely the opposite will happen. The real issue is how to have even money bets pay over time, as streaks, both good and bad, can happen.

[@robertd3053]

Exactly!

[@robertd3053]

@@michaelhaverstock7125 Exactly!

[@funkychunky5470]

Never in 1000 years anyone would use this strategy in roulette

[@phillipbradley5074]

To say that the second is "1000 times better" is ludicrous! They are both fool's errands. The second system benefited from several very choppy intervals where the first system had streak after streak. I'm not going to run the numbers but It's a pretty safe bet that the second system would have destroyed the bankroll with the numbers from the first. Continually chasing a recovery with larger and larger bets without a stop-loss reset is absolute insanity. There has never been and never will be a foolproof way to beat the casino.

[@MaxPower-jc9os]

You've got to stop using this simulator because of the learning algorithm. I'd really like to see these strategies trialled in a neutral setting

[@patrickmurray8451]

Exactly

[@johnblyth9787]

Not sure what you mean by neutral setting. But why don't you do it

[@l6479]

The Roulette channel to test your system

[@gotyigapv]

Bullshit. Every day!

[@clydeb7713]

Which of these systems owns the distinction of the most insane way to kiss your money goodbye?

[@robertott2631]

These systems are great., I can’t wait to try them

[@clydeb7713]

@robertott2631 I will take your action. I will even spin a live 🛞 wheel for you Roulette can not be beat long term.

[@cgladden7652]

Every SYSTEM is the Best ever with this guy. Flies thru each bet in 10 seconds or less Real casino bets every 5 minutes Better channels out there Roulette jackpot out there

[@moochiekk]

He doesn't just cater to brick and mortar casino players, there are online casinos that spin even more frequently than this. Also, the titles of the videos are just to take advantage of the algorithm, blame Google for that. He does show often how lot of these 'best' systems fail miserably.

[@avantgardedoboj4810]

1 .P R-System had no chance,because Roulette Royal dont want it.

[@slikdarelic]

followin the color after it hits twice is a more improved strategy for this.. maybe try it that way..

[@bobgiebelhouse3212]

How many times will we tortured with the 1st system? Betting on the chop will bust your bankroll, betting on follow the winner would make more sense, even if every spin is a new one and the ball has no memory. Just look on the numbers of your local casino, if they show them on their website. There are way more color streaks than the choppy colors.

[@dieterromanwicht6]

If you lost .. no problem because you have a 2000$ bankroll. what a bold claim.

[@Goldfinger315]

The casino recovers your money for them

[@joeyurkovich3272]

The 2nd system modification is slightly more aggressive. I think it would have lost with the 1st system's numbers. As with any system, if you get a "bad" string of numbers, you will lose. The real question: Are you taking "FULL" advantage of a "good" string of numbers?

[@tqsuited]

I would consider just sitting out spins entirely until it chops back, maybe after 2 consecutive losses you sit out.. so rather than betting like 60 in the next recovery (6 losses in a row) you're only betting 20. The 2nd system modification helps with this, but may as well reduce the recovery bets as small as possible before they balloon out. Still hard to avoid getting wiped out if you keep losing each recovery bet.. can still lose 4-5 in a row, as a traditional martingale could also do but quicker.

[@philiphebbard]

Snag is, if playing with roulette chips you have to bet every spin - at least in the BC Lower Mainland casinos. It would work, playing outside bets, with 'cash' chips.

[@ahbalone]

So you're betting on the chop even if it's not happening. And then loading up to recover back to even in one roll. I'm not sure what the definition of genius is in this case

[@I86282]

17:15. You said 3 losses twice.! The 2nd 3rd loss was the 4th loss.! Oh. You start counting after the initial loss of 25. I see. 🍻

[@Dave_Verbeek]

Yeah you lost the bankroll a couple times now on the progressive recovery system. Its just a delayed martingale and you are bound to lose your bankroll at some point. Terrible system

[@timothyfuqua7272]

I tried this the other way where u play same color and you recover when you get 3 in a row and I lost my bankroll.

[@Aspie66]

Aggressive bankroll destroyer strikes again. Time to sack this one RM

[@andreasapelqvist9247]

Interesting mod. Its time to let the og die. Its not the first time it has lost the bankroll

[@michaelhaverstock7125]

This is nothing more than a martingale with a whole bunch of small bets put in between. As a matter of fact it’s worse than straight martingailing because now when you go to martingale, it’s at a higher bet than it would be if you didn’t stick in the smaller bets. Just martingale right out of the box and you stand a higher chance of not losing your bankroll. With a straight martingale at a $10 bet and $2000 bankroll, you have 7.5 chances. With sticking in the smaller losses in between your martingale chance, you now have less than 7, and possibly less than 6 chances to “recover”. It’s like putting lipstick on a pig.

[@michaelhaverstock7125]

Every “recover” is nothing more than a martingale. Except the progression is even worse than a straight up martingale with all the other $10 bets tacked onto it.

[@brandonfletcher8975]

Exactly what I was thinking, well said, it's still 100% a martingale just spread out a bit with 10$ loses in between to dig the hole deeper. How does he not realize this???

[@eschaasberg]

I don't agree to that. When you lose 7 times in a row with this one, you lost 7x$5=$35 so to recover you need only that. Losing 7 times with Martingale is $5,10,20,40,80,160,320 so your bet will be $320 to recover.

[@michaelhaverstock7125]

Your “recover” is the martingale. Except that it’s a super martingale. Because you aren’t just martingailing the initial bet you are now doubling the initial bet plus all the $10 bets in between. If you loose 5 “recover” bets in a row you are done. At least with the standard martingale you have 7 losses in a row to “recover”. It’s a super martingale, with a whole bunch of small $10 bets thrown in the middle to disguise it into being something else. It’s a wolf in sheep’s clothing. Surely you can take a second and think about it, and see it for what it is.

The best thing to do in this original PR strategy is to switch to follow the color after 3 losses on bet opposites and visa versa…By staying on one side your bankroll is doomed.

[@michaelhaverstock7125]

Yes if we only knew exactly when it was going to chop…..oh wait….we don’t….so it makes no difference if you bet the chop or the streak, or bet red red black or rrbb, or any progression.

[@robertott2631]

I think these two systems are spectacular., can’t wait to try them.!!

[@guardianking9209]

These types are so stupid why keep betting $10 and count the loss? Just wait for the switch and betting up. Less loss and the outcome is way better

[@choongfongchoo2595]

Why make thing so difficult

[@skyisthelimit-ez9oe]

He is not playing with real money

[@superproud100]

A thousand better💩💩💩